- Accounting, Organizations and Society, 97, Article 101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101296 Samiolo, R., & Mehrpouya, A. (2021). Between stakehold‐ ers and third parties: Regulatory rankings and the organization of competition. Research in the Sociol‐ ogy of Organizations, 74, 77–100.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Andersson, S., & Heywood, P. M. (2009). The politics of perception: Use and abuse of Transparency Interna‐ tional’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767.
- Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2021). A neverending story: Tracing the OECD’s evolving narratives within a global devel‐ opment complex. Globalisation, Societies and Educa‐ tion, 19(2), 183–197.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bandola‐Gill, J., Grek, S., & Ronzani, M. (2021). Beyond winners and losers: Ranking visualizations as align‐ ment devices in global public policy. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 74, 27–52.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bandola‐Gill, J., Grek, S., & Tichenor, M. (2023). The rise of the reflexive expert? Epistemic, care‐ful and instru‐ mental reflexivity in global public policy. Global Social Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/14680181221145382 Bartl, W., Papilloud, C., & Terracher‐Lipinski, A. (2019). Governing by numbers—Key indicators and the poli‐ tics of expectations: An introduction. Historical Social Research, 44(2), 7–43.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Beaumont, P., & Towns, A. E. (2021). The rankings game: Politics and Governance, 2023, Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 189–199 A relational approach to country performance indica‐ tors. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1467–1494.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bowers, A., & Prato, M. (2019). The role of third‐party rankings in status dynamics: How does the stability of rankings induce status changes? Organization Sci‐ ence, 30(6), 1146–1164.
- Brankovic, J. (2021). “Measure of shame”: Media career of the global slavery index. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 74, 103–125.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brighenti, A. M. (2018). The social life of measures: Conceptualizing measure‐value environments. The‐ ory, Culture & Society, 35(1), 23–44.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Broome, A., Homolar, A., & Kranke, M. (2018). Bad sci‐ ence: International organizations and the indirect power of global benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 514–539.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and action in organizations. Wiley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chong, P., & Bourgoin, A. (2020). Communicating credi‐ bility by expert service workers: The credibility tactics of fiction critics and management consultants. Valu‐ ation Studies, 7(1), 65–100.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cobham, A. (2013, July 22). Corrupting perceptions: Why Transparency International’s flagship corruption index falls short. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy. com/2013/07/22/corrupting‐perceptions Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (2012). Indica‐ tors as a technology of global governance. Law & Soci‐ ety Review, 46(1), 71–104.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- De Paola, J., & Pirttilä‐Backman, A. M. (2023). Are we bad winners? Public understandings of the United Nations’ world happiness report among Finnish dig‐ ital media and their readers. Public Understanding of Science, 32(1), 20–39.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Espeland, W., & Stevens, M. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 401–436.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fehl, C., & Freistein, K. (2020). Organising global stratifi‐ cation: How international organisations (re)produce inequalities in international society. Global Society, 34(3), 285–303.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fourcade, M. (2016). Ordinalization: Lewis A. Coser memorial award for theoretical agenda setting 2014. Sociological Theory, 34(3), 175–195.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hamann, J., & Ringel, L. (2023). On the symbiotic rela‐ tionship between university rankings and their crit‐ ics. Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734‐022‐00990‐x Hansen, H., & Flyverbom, M. (2015). The politics of trans‐ parency and the calibration of knowledge in the digi‐ tal age. Organization, 22(6), 872–889.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Harness, D., Ganesh, S., & Stohl, C. (2022). Visibility agents: Organizing transparency in the digital era.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hough, D. (2016, January 27). Here’s this year’s (flawed) corruption perception index. Those flaws are useful.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kalthoff, H. (2005). Practices of calculation: Economic representations and risk management. Theory, Cul‐ ture & Society, 22(2), 69–97.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kelley, J. (2017). Scorecard diplomacy: Grading states to influence their reputation and behavior. Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kelley, J., & Simmons, B. (2015). Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international rela‐ tions. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 55–70.
Kelley, J., & Simmons, B. (2019). Introduction: The power of global performance indicators. International Orga‐ nization, 73(3), 491–510.
- Landahl, J. (2020). The PISA calendar: Temporal gov‐ ernance and international large‐scale assessments. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(6), 625–639.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lokot, T., & Wijermars, M. (2023). The politics of inter‐ net freedom rankings. Internet Policy Review, 12(2), 1–35. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/ politics‐of‐internet‐freedom‐rankings Mehrpouya, A., & Samiolo, R. (2016). Performance mea‐ surement in global governance: Ranking and the poli‐ tics of variability. Accounting, Organizations and Soci‐ ety, 55, 12–31.
- Mende, J., & Müller, T. (2023). Publics in global poli‐ tics: A framing paper. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 91–97.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mennicken, A., & Espeland, W. (2019). What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 223–245.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Merry, S. E. (2016). The seductions of quantification: Measuring human rights, gender violence, and sex trafficking. University of Chicago Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nelken, D. (2015). Conclusion: Contesting global indi‐ cators. In S. E. Merry, K. E. David, & B. Kings‐bury Politics and Governance, 2023, Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 189–199 (Eds.), The quiet power of indicators: Measuring gov‐ ernance, corruption and the rule of law (pp. 317–338). Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221137816 Honig, D., & Weaver, C. (2019). A race to the top? The aid transparency index and the social power of global performance indicators. International Organization, 73(3), 579–610.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- org/images/CPI2021_Report_EN‐web.pdf Transparency International. [@anticorruption]. (2022b). 5 Fun facts about corruption: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Corrup‐ tion is no fun. At all. Do not tolerate it [Tweet].
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pollock, N., & D’Adderio, L. (2012). Give me a two‐by‐ two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality. Account‐ ing, Organizations and Society, 37(8), 565–586.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objec‐ tivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Power, M., Scheytt, T., Soin, K., & Sahlin, K. (2009). Repu‐ tational risk as a logic of organizing in late modernity. Organization Studies, 30(2/3), 301–324.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ringel, L. (2021). Challenging valuations: How rank‐ ings navigate contestation. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 50(5), 289–305.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ringel, L., Brankovic, J., & Werron, T. (2020). The orga‐ nizational engine of rankings: Connecting “new” and “old” institutionalism. Politics & Governance, 8(2), 36–47.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ringel, L., Espeland, W., Sauder, M., & Werron, T. (2021). Worlds of rankings. Research in the Sociology of Orga‐ nizations, 74, 1–23.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ronzani, M., & Gatzweiler, M. K. (2022). The lure of the visual: Multimodality, simplification, and perfor‐ mance measurement visualizations in a megaproject.
- Seabrooke, L., & Wigan, D. (2015). How activists use benchmarks: Reformist and revolutionary bench‐ marks for global economic justice. Review of Interna‐ tional Studies, 41(5), 887–904.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost. com/news/monkey‐cage/wp/2016/01/27/how‐ do‐you‐measure‐corruption‐transparency‐ international‐does‐its‐best‐and‐thats‐useful Hunter, B., & Shaffer, J. (2022). Human capital, risk and the World Bank’s reintermediation in global develop‐ ment. Third World Quarterly, 43(1), 35–54.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Towns, A. E., & Rumelili, B. (2017). Taking the pressure: Unpacking the relation between norms, social hierar‐ chies, and social pressures on states. European Jour‐ nal of International Relations, 23, 756–779.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Transparency International. (2012). Corruption percep‐ tions index 2012: An updated methodology. https:// www.transparency.org/files/content/pressrelease/ 2012_CPIUpdatedMethodology_EMBARGO_EN.pdf Transparency International. (2020). Corruption per‐ ceptions index 2020: Frequently asked questions. https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2020_ CPI_FAQs_ENv2.pdf Transparency International. (2022a). Corruption percep‐ tions index 2021. https://images.transparencycdn.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Twitter. https://twitter.com/anticorruption/status/ 1564526563684761602?s=20 Waibel, D., Peetz, T., & Meier, F. (2021). Valuation con‐ stellations. Valuation Studies, 8(1), 33–66.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wang, H., & Rosenau, J. N. (2001). Transparency Inter‐ national and corruption as an issue of global gover‐ nance. Global Governance, 7(1), 25–49.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Werron, T. (2014). On public forms of competition. Cul‐ tural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14(1), 62–76.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zapp, M. (2022). International organisations and the pro‐ liferation of scientised global reporting, 1947–2019. Global Society, 36(4), 455–474.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zerndt, E. (2020). Historicizing the comparative survey of freedom: Tracing the social trajectory of an influen‐ tial indicator. Science in Context, 33(2), 121–144. About the Author Leopold Ringel is a lecturer at the Faculty of Sociology at Bielefeld University. With a focus on the rela‐ tionship between fields, discourses, and practices of valuation, he has studied themes such as orga‐ nizational transparency or metrics. His work has been published in Ephemera, Organization Studies, Politics and Governance, and Research in the Sociology of Organizations.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now