This document has not been cited yet.

1. Aue, L., & Börgel, F. (2023). From “bangtan boys” to “international relations professor”: Mapping self‐ identifications in the UN’s Twitter public. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 120–133.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (2010). Who Politics and Governance, 2023, Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 91–97 governs the globe? In D. D. Avant, M. Finnemore, & S. K. Sell (Eds.), Who governs the globe? (pp. 1–31). Cambridge University Press.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Bajenova, T. (2023). European think tanks as a channel of EU public diplomacy towards transnational publics. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 200–212.

4. Baum, M. A., & Potter, P. B. K. (2019). Media, public opin‐ ion, and foreign policy in the age of social media. The Journal of Politics, 81(2), 747–756.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Ecker‐Ehrhardt, M. (2023). Public legitimation by “going personal”? The ambiguous role of international orga‐ nization officials on social media. Politics and Gover‐ nance, 11(3), 213–225.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Eriksen, S. S., & Sending, O. J. (2013). There is no global public: The idea of the public and the legitimation of governance. International Theory, 5(2), 213–237.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contri‐ bution to the critique of actually existing democracy.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Fraser, N. (2007). Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post‐Westphalian world. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 7–30.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Habermas, J. (1992). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Blackwell.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Herborth, B. (2023). Subaltern counterpublics in global politics. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 98–108.

11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971913000183 Flyverbom, M. (2019). The digital prism: Transparency and managed visibilities in a datafied world. Cam‐ bridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Huber, V., & Osterhammel, J. (2020). Introduction: Global publics. In V. Huber & J. Osterhammel (Eds.), Global publics: Their power and their limits, 1870–1990 (pp. 1–60). Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Kelley, J. G., & Simmons, B. A. (2019). Introduction: The power of global performance indicators. Interna‐ tional Organization, 73(3), 491–510.

14. Kelley, J. G., & Simmons, B. A. (2021). Governance by other means: Rankings as regulatory systems. Inter‐ national Theory, 13(1), 169–178. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1752971920000457 Koppell, J. G. S. (2010). Administration without borders.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Liebetrau, T., & Monsees, L. (2023). Assembling publics: Microsoft, cybersecurity, and public‐private rela‐ tions. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 157–167.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Müller, T. (2021). Third‐party actors, transparency and global military affairs. In M. Albert & T. Werron (Eds.), What in the world? Understanding global social change (pp. 227–241). Bristol University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Müller, T. (2023). Satellites and the changing politics of transparency in world politics. Politics and Gover‐ nance, 11(3), 178–188.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). Perspective—The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20(6), 1034–1052. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0472 Mansbridge, J. J. (1990). The rise and fall of self‐interest in the explanation of political life. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self‐interest (pp. 3–22). Chicago Univer‐ sity Press.

19. McCarthy, D. R., & Fluck, M. (2017). The concept of trans‐ parency in international relations: Towards a criti‐ cal approach. European Journal of International Rela‐ tions, 23(2), 416–440.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. McLarren, K. (2023). Christian churches and the Ukraine war: Introducing religious publics in global politics. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 134–144.

21. Mende, J. (2023a). Business authority in global gov‐ ernance: Companies beyond public and private roles. Journal of International Political Theory, 19(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088222111 Mende, J. (2023b). Public interests and the legitimation of global governance actors. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 109–119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Mitzen, J. (2005). Reading Habermas in anarchy: Multilat‐ eral diplomacy and global public spheres. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 401–417.

23. Nash, K. (Ed.). (2014). Transnationalizing the public sphere. Polity.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Politics and Governance, 2023, Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 91–97 Tallberg, J., & Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legit‐ imation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. The Review of International Orga‐ nizations, 14(4), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11558‐018‐9330‐7 Vinken, M. (2023). Shaping global public spheres through international law: An investigation into international climate change law. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 145–156.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 46–55. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‐6210.2010.02245.x Leftwich, A. (2004). What is politics? Polity.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Ringel, L. (2023). The Janus face of valuation: Global per‐ formance indicators as powerful and criticized public measures. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 189–199.

27. Ruggie, J. G. (2004). Reconstituting the global pub‐ lic domain—Issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations, 10(4), 499–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047847 Schlag, G. (2023). European Union’s regulating of social media: A discourse analysis of the Digital Services Act. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 168–177.

28. Schneiker, A. (2021). Die Rolle sozialer Medien in den Internationalen Beziehungen [The role of social media in international relations]. Zeitschrift für Inter‐ nationale Beziehungen, 28(2), 100–108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Seeliger, M., & Sevignani, S. (Eds.). (2021). Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? [A new structural transformation of the public?] Nomos.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Sending, O. J. (2016). The transformation of international publicness. In W. Hofmeister & J. Melissen (Eds.), Rethinking international institutions: Diplomacy and impact on emerging world order (pp. 79–88). Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Steffek, J. (2015). The output legitimacy of international organizations and the global public interest. Interna‐ tional Theory, 7(2), 263–293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Stone, D. (2020). Making global policy. Cambridge Uni‐ versity Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Volkmer, I. (2014). The global public sphere: Public com‐ munication in the age of reflective interdependence. Polity Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Wenzlhuemer, R. (2013). Connecting the nineteenth‐ century world: The telegraph and globalization. Cam‐ bridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Author‐ ity, legitimacy and contestation. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Zegart, A. B. (2022). Spies, lies, and algorithms: The his‐ tory and future of American intelligence. Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. After Post‐Truth: Revisiting the Lippmann–Dewey Debate. (2025). Herborth, Benjamin ; Reis, Filipe Dos ; Nhr, Andreas Aagaard.
   In: Politics and Governance.
   RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9735.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The perils of ranking mining countries and regions: a critical look at the annual survey of the Fraser Institute. (2024). Söderholm, Patrik ; Soderholm, Patrik ; Ericsson, Magnus ; Hellman, Frida.
   In: Mineral Economics.
   RePEc:spr:minecn:v:37:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s13563-023-00405-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Evaluating countries’ performances by means of rank trajectories: functional measures of magnitude and evolution. (2024). Fortuna, Francesca ; Naccarato, Alessia ; Terzi, Silvia.
   In: Computational Statistics.
   RePEc:spr:compst:v:39:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-022-01278-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Indicator accountability or policy shrinking? Multistakeholder partnerships in reviews of the sustainable development goals. (2024). Bexell, Magdalena.
   In: Global Policy.
   RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:276-287.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. International rankings and public opinion: Compliance, dismissal, or backlash?. (2023). Yair, Omer ; Efrat, Asif.
   In: The Review of International Organizations.
   RePEc:spr:revint:v:18:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11558-022-09484-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper. (2023). Muller, Thomas ; Mende, Janne.
   In: Politics and Governance.
   RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:91-97.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The Janus Face of Valuation: Global Performance Indicators as Powerful and Criticized Public Measures. (2023). Ringel, Leopold.
   In: Politics and Governance.
   RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:189-199.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper. (2023). Mende, Janne ; Mller, Thomas.
   In: Politics and Governance.
   RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:3:p:91-97.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The Janus Face of Valuation: Global Performance Indicators as Powerful and Criticized Public Measures. (2023). Ringel, Leopold.
   In: Politics and Governance.
   RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:3:p:189-199.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Introducing the Berggruen Governance Index I: Conceptual and methodological framework. (2023). Lang, Markus ; Anheier, Helmut K ; Knudsen, Edward L.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:s4:p:5-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Advancing governance indicator systems: Lessons learned from the 2022 symposium. (2023). List, Regina A ; Anheier, Helmut K ; Knudsen, Edward L.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:s4:p:136-146.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Statistical entrepreneurs: the political work of infrastructuring the SDG indicators. (2022). Bandola-Gill, Justyna.
    In: Policy and Society.
    RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:41:y:2022:i:4:p:498-512..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Getting the “basics”? The World Bank’s narrative construction of poverty reduction in China. (2022). Varga, Mihai.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:120:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722002496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Cyber Sovereignty: How China is Changing the Rules of Internet Freedom. (2022). Hulvey, Rachel A.
    In: Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:globco:qt7sg3716k.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The Development of Neoliberal Measures of Competitiveness. (2021). Plehwe, Dieter.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:235910.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. The effectiveness of soft law in international environmental regimes: participation and compliance in the Hyogo Framework for Action. (2021). , Maximilian.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:21:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-020-09490-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Compliance without coercion: Effects of reporting on international labor rights. (2021). Sommerer, Thomas ; Tallberg, Jonas ; Koliev, Faradj.
    In: Journal of Peace Research.
    RePEc:sae:joupea:v:58:y:2021:i:3:p:494-509.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The financial consequences of rating international institutions: competition, collaboration, and the politics of assessment. (2021). Lall, Ranjit.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:107032.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. The Arctic Environmental Responsibility Index: A method to rank heterogenous extractive industry companies for governance purposes. (2021). Tsani, Stella ; Vakulchuk, Roman ; Juraev, Javlon ; Overland, Indra ; Stammler, Florian ; Wilson, Emma C ; Podgaiskii, Eduard ; Dale, Brigt ; Bourmistrov, Anatoli ; Irlbacherfox, Stephanie.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:1623-1643.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. How Does the World Bank Influence the Development Policy Priorities of Low-Income and Lower-Middle Income Countries ?. (2020). Harutyunyan, Ani ; Knack, Stephen ; Dilorenzo, Matthew ; Parks, Bradley Christopher.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Do expert surveys underrate lower-income countries?. (2020). Urbatsch, R.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:49:y:2020:i:8:s0048733320301360.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Social Science and the Analysis of Environmental Policy. (2020). Starobin, Shana M ; Coglianese, Cary.
    In: Review of Policy Research.
    RePEc:bla:revpol:v:37:y:2020:i:5:p:578-604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. The effectiveness of soft law in international environmental regimes: participation and compliance in the Hyogo Framework for Action. (). , Maximilian.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s10784-020-09490-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-05 08:35:42 || Missing content? Let us know