create a website

Driving factors behind precision livestock farming tools adoption: The case of the pedometer on dairy farms. (2024). Lusk, Jayson ; Selvaggi, R ; Pappalardo, G ; Zarba, C.
In: Agricultural Systems.
RePEc:eee:agisys:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0308521x24002403.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 47

References cited by this document

Cocites: 37

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abeni, F. ; Petrera, F. ; Galli, A. A survey of Italian dairy farmers’ propensity for precision livestock farming tools. 2019 Animals. 9 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Akzar, R. ; Umberger, W. ; Peralta, A. Understanding heterogeneity in technology adoption among indonesian smallholder dairy farmers. 2023 Agribusiness. 39 347-370

  3. Aubert, A.B. ; Schroeder, A. ; Grimaudo, J. IT as enabler of sustainable farming: an empirical analysis of farmers’ adoption decision of precision agriculture technology. 2012 Decis. Support. Syst.. 54 510-520
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Berckmans, D. General introduction to precision livestock farming. 2017 Anim. Front.. 7 6-11
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bliemer, M. ; Collins, A. On determining priors for the generation of efficient stated choice experimental designs. 2016 Journal of choice modelling. 21 10-14

  6. Borchers, M.R. ; Bewley, J.M. An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, prepurchase considerations, and usefulness. 2015 J. Dairy Sci.. 98 4198-4205
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Brooks, K. ; Lusk, J.L. Stated and revealed preferences for organic and cloned Milk: combining choice experiment and scanner data. 2010 Amer. J of Ag. Econ.. 92 1229-1241

  8. Castle, M.H. ; Lubben, B.D. ; Luck, J.D. Factors influencing the adoption of precision agriculture technologies by Nebraska producers. Presentations, working papers, and gray literature. 2016 Agric. Econ.. 49 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Chang, J.B. ; Lusk, J.L. ; Norwood, F.B. How closely do hypothetical surveys and laboratory experiments predict field behavior?. 2009 Am. J. Agric. Econ.. 91 518-534
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Das, V.J. ; Sharma, S. ; Kaushik, A. Views of Irish farmers on smart farming technologies: an observational study. 2019 AgriEngineering. 1 164-187
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. de Koning, C.J.A.M. Automatic milking - common practice on dairy farms. 2010 En : The First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management, Toronto, Canada. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Dela Rue, B.T. ; Eastwood, C.R. Individualised feeding of concentrate supplement in pasture-based dairy systems: practices and perceptions of New Zealand dairy farmers and their advisors. 2017 Anim. Prod. Sci.. 57 1543-1549
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Dhraief, M.Z. ; Bedhiaf, S. ; Dhehibi, B. ; Oueslati-Zlaoui, M. ; Jebali, O. ; Ben-Youssef, S. Factors affecting innovative technologies adoption by livestock holders in arid area of Tunisia. 2019 New Medit. 18 3-18
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Eastwood, C.R. ; Chapman, D.F. ; Paine, M.S. Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia. 2012 Agr. Syst.. 108 10-18

  15. Ferguson, J.D. ; Azzaro, G. ; Gambina, M. ; Licitra, G. Prevalence of mastitis pathogens in Ragusa, Sicily, from 2000 to 2006. 2007 J. Dairy Sci.. 90 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Galon, N. The use of pedometry for estrus detection in dairy cows in Israel. 2010 J. Reprod. Dev.. 56 S48-S52
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Gargiulo, J.L. ; Eastwood, C.R. ; Garcia, S.C. ; Lyons, N.A. Dairy farmers with larger herd sizes adopt more precision dairy technologies. 2018 J. Dairy Sci.. 101 5466-5473
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Hensher, D. ; Louviere, L. ; Swait, J. Combining sources of preference data. 1998 J. Econ.. 89 197-221

  19. Hostiou, N. ; Fagon, J. ; Chauvat, S. ; Turlot, A. ; Kling-Eveillard, F. ; Boivin, X. ; Allain, C. Impact of precision livestock farming on work and human-animal interactions on dairy farms. A review. 2017 Biotechnology, Agronomy and Society and Environment. 21 268-275
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Jelinski, M.D. ; Kelton, D.F. ; Luby, C. ; Waldner, C. Factors associated with the adoption of technologies by the Canadian dairy industry. 2020 Canadian Veterinary Journal. 61 1065-1072
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Krampe, C. ; Serratosa, J. ; Niemi, J.K. ; Ingenbleek, P.T.M. Consumer perceptions of precision livestock farming - a qualitative study in three European countries. 2021 Animals. 11 1221-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Langer, G. ; Schaper, C. ; Sonntag, W.I. A conceptual approach towards surveying German dairy farmers’ acceptance of digitization in dairy production. 2022 Berichte uber Landwirtschaft. 100 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Louviere, J.J. ; Hensher, D.A. ; Swait, J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. 2000 Cambridge University Press:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Lusk, J.L. ; Schroeder, T.C. Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks. 2004 Am. J. Agric. Econ.. 86 467-482

  25. Maatje, K. ; Loeffler, S.H. ; Engel, B. Predicting optimal time of insemination in cows that show visual signs of estrus by estimating onset of estrus with pedometers. 1997 J. Dairy Sci.. 80 1098-1105
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Maroto-Molina, F. ; Navarro-García, J. ; Príncipe-Aguirre, K. ; Gómez-Maqueda, I. ; Guerrero-Ginel, J.E. ; Garrido-Varo, A. ; Pérez-Marín, D.C. A low-cost IOT-based system to monitor the location of a whole herd. 2019 Sensors (Switzerland). 19 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Mazrier, H. ; Tal, S. ; Aizinbud, E. ; Bargai, U. A field investigation of the use of the pedometer for the early detection of lameness in cattle. 2006 Can. Vet. J.. 47 883-886
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. McDonald, R. ; Heanue, K. ; Pierce, K. ; Horan, B. Factors influencing new entrant dairy farmer's decision-making process around technology adoption. 2016 Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 22 163-177
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Morrone, S. ; Dimauro, C. ; Gambella, F. ; Cappai, M.G. Industry 4.0 and precision livestock farming (PLF): an up to date overview across animal productions. 2022 Sensors. 22 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Munz, J. ; Schuele, H. Influencing the success of precision farming technology adoption—a model-based investigation of economic success factors in small-scale agriculture. 2022 Agriculture (Switzerland). 12 -

  31. Naspetti, S. ; Mandolesi, S. ; Buysse, J. ; Latvala, T. ; Nicholas, P. ; Padel, S. ; Van Loo, E.J. ; Zanoli, R. Determinants of the acceptance of sustainable production strategies among dairy farmers: development and testing of a modified technology acceptance model. 2017 Sustainability. 9 1805-

  32. Nebel, R.L. ; Dransfield, M.G. ; Jobst, S.M. Automated electronic systems for the detection of oestrus and timing of AI in cattle. 2000 Anim. Reprod. Sci.. 60 713-723
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Palma-Molina, P. ; Hennessy, T. ; O’Connor, A.H. ; Onakuse, S. ; O’Leary, N. ; Moran, B. ; Shalloo, L. Factors associated with intensity of technology adoption and with the adoption of 4 clusters of precision livestock farming technologies in Irish pasture-based dairy systems. 2023 J. Dairy Sci.. 106 2498-2509
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Pathak, H.S. ; Brown, P. ; Best, T. A systematic literature review of the factors affecting the precision agriculture adoption process. 2019 Precis. Agric.. 20 1292-1316
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Pugliese, M. ; Biondi, V. ; Passantino, A. ; Licitra, F. ; Alibrandi, A. ; Zanghi, A. ; Conte, F. ; Marino, G. Welfare assessment in intensive and semi-intensive dairy cattle management system in Sicily. 2021 Anim. Sci. J.. 92 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. 2003 Simon and Schuster: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Rutten, C.J. ; Steeneveld, W. ; Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M. ; Hogeveen, H. Delaying investments in sensor technology: the rationality of dairy farmers’ investment decisions illustrated within the framework of real options theory. 2018 J. Dairy Sci.. 101 7650-7660
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Rutten, C.J. ; Velthuis, A.G.J. ; Steeneveld, W. ; Hogeveen, H. Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. 2013 J. Dairy Sci.. 96 1928-1952
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Ruzzante, S. ; Labarta, R. ; Bilton, A. Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. 2021 World Dev.. 146 -

  40. Selvaggi, R. ; Zanchini, R. ; Zarbà, C. ; Pecorino, B. ; Pappalardo, G. Simultaneous Evaluation of Dairy farmers’ Behaviour and Intention to Adopt Technological Devices. 2024 Aestimum:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Shepley, E. ; Berthelot, M. ; Vasseur, E. Validation of the ability of a 3D pedometer to accurately determine the number of steps taken by dairy cows when housed in tie-stalls. 2017 Agriculture. 7 53-

  42. Silvi, R. ; Pereira, L.G.R. ; Paiva, C.A.V. ; Tomich, T.R. ; Teixeira, V.A. ; Sacramento, J.P. ; Ferreira, R.E.P. ; Coelho, S.G. ; Machado, F.S. ; Campos, M.M. ; Dórea, J.R.R. Adoption of precision technologies by Brazilian dairy farms: the Farmer’s perception. 2021 Animals. 11 3488-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Stone, A.E. Symposium review: the most important factors affecting adoption of precision dairy monitoring technologies. 2020 J. Dairy Sci.. 103 5740-5745
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Svennersten-Sjaunja, K.M. ; Pettersson, G. Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe. 2008 J. Anim. Sci.. 86 37-46
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Vecchio, Y. ; Agnusdei, G.P. ; Miglietta, P.P. ; Capitanio, F. Adoption of precision farming tools: the case of Italian farmers. 2020 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17 -

  46. Walker, J.L. ; Wang, Y. ; Thorhauge, M. ; Ben-Akiva, M. D-efficient or deficient? A robustness analysis of stated choice experimental designs. 2018 Theor. Decis.. 84 215-238

  47. Yatribi, T. Factors affecting precision agriculture adoption: a systematic literature review. 2020 Economics. 8 103-121
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Social acceptance of new floating offshore wind power: Do attitudes towards existing offshore industries matter?. (2024). Navrud, Stale ; Alfnes, Frode ; Nytte, Sharon.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:230:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124009236.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. An assessment of the current use of hybrid choice models in environmental economics, and considerations for future applications. (2024). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Liebe, Ulf ; Artabe, Alaitz ; Mariel, Petr.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:53:y:2024:i:c:s1755534524000526.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Driving factors behind precision livestock farming tools adoption: The case of the pedometer on dairy farms. (2024). Lusk, Jayson ; Selvaggi, R ; Pappalardo, G ; Zarba, C.
    In: Agricultural Systems.
    RePEc:eee:agisys:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0308521x24002403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Business model development for installation of rubber floor mats to support productivity in dairy farming. (2024). Srithep, Yottha ; Pattiya, Adisak ; Luangsakdapich, Rujira ; Sawangloke, Weerasak ; Chanthes, Suteera.
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal.
    RePEc:ags:areint:355968.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Consumer preferences for craft beer: The interplay of localness and advertising language. (2024). Drichoutis, Andreas ; Cerjak, Marija ; Bazzani, Claudia.
    In: 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea22:343728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Keeping an eye on cost: What can eye tracking tell us about attention to cost information in discrete choice experiments?. (2023). Genie, Mesfin G ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:32:y:2023:i:5:p:1101-1119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Effects of Institutional Setting on Value Estimates of Stated Preference Surveys in Developing Economies: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Conserving Biodiversity in The Cape Floristic Region. (2023). Manhique, Henrique ; Watzold, Frank.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:118750.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Social Impact Scoping Using Statistical Methods: The Case of a Novel Design of Abandoned Farmland Policy. (2023). Irie, Noriko ; Kawahara, Naoko.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2929-:d:1059421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Willingness to pay for COVID-19 mitigation measures in public transport and paratransit in low-income countries. (2023). Batool, Zahara ; Mukwaya, Paul Isolo ; Islam, Mohaimanul ; Rahman, Farzana ; Uzondu, Chinebuli ; Bwambale, Andrew ; Wadud, Zia.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:167:y:2023:i:c:s0965856422003123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Climate change adaptation preferences of winemakers from the Rioja wine appellation. (2023). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Mariel, Petr ; Chovan, Milan ; Corsi, Armando Maria ; Vega-Bayo, Ainhoa.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:48:y:2023:i:c:s1755534523000350.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers Preferences and Biodiversity Levels. (2023). Venus, Terese E ; Mennig, Philipp ; Wiesmeier, Miriam ; Sauer, Johannes ; Canessa, Carolin.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:213:y:2023:i:c:s0921800923002173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Managing the energy trilemma of reliability, affordability and renewables: Assessing consumer demands with discrete choice experiments. (2023). Tocock, Mark ; Rose, John M ; Tinch, Dugald ; MacDonald, Darla Hatton.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:67:y:2023:i:2:p:155-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Farmers’ preferences over alternative AECS designs. Do the ecological conditions influence the willingness to accept result-based contracts?. (2023). Venus, Terese ; Mennig, Philipp ; Wiesmeier, Miriam ; Sauer, Johannes ; Canessa, Carolin.
    In: 97th Annual Conference, March 27-29, 2023, Warwick University, Coventry, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aesc23:334508.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Do shippers’ characteristics influence port choice criteria? Capturing heterogeneity by using latent class models. (2022). Feo-Valero, Maria ; Martinez-Moya, Julian.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:116:y:2022:i:c:p:96-105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Shippers vs. freight forwarders: Do they differ in their port choice decisions? Evidence from the Spanish ceramic tile industry. (2022). Feo-Valero, Maria ; Martinez-Moya, Julian.
    In: Research in Transportation Economics.
    RePEc:eee:retrec:v:95:y:2022:i:c:s073988592200018x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Are consumers willing to pay for in‐vitro meat? An investigation of naming effects. (2022). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Bazzani, Claudia ; Asioli, Daniele.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:73:y:2022:i:2:p:356-375.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Consumers Choice Behavior for Cisgenic Food: Exploring the Role of Time Preferences. (2021). Banterle, Alessandro ; de Marchi, Elisa ; Cavaliere, Alessia.
    In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
    RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:43:y:2021:i:2:p:866-891.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The Willingness to Pay for Residential PV Plants in Italy: A Discrete Choice Experiment. (2021). Bragolusi, Paolo ; Dalpaos, Chiara.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10544-:d:641269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Preferences for curtailable electricity contracts: Can curtailment benefit consumers and the electricity system?. (2021). Bertsch, Valentin ; Harold, Jason ; Fell, Harrison.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0140988321003418.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Quantifying Loss of Benefits from Poor Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Projects: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Farmers in Kenya. (2021). Markova-Nenova, Nonka ; Nthambi, Mary ; Watzold, Frank.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:179:y:2021:i:c:s0921800919319330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Why do We Know So Much and Yet So Little? A Scoping Review of Willingness to Pay for Human Excreta Derived Material in Agriculture. (2020). Gwara, Simon ; Wale, Edilegnaw ; Buckley, Chris ; Odindo, Alfred.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6490-:d:397690.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Shippers’ willingness to delegate modal control in freight transportation. (2020). Khakdaman, Masoud ; Tavasszy, Lorant A ; Rezaei, Jafar.
    In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.
    RePEc:eee:transe:v:141:y:2020:i:c:s1366554520306785.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Analysing travel mode and airline choice using latent class modelling: A case study in Western Australia. (2020). Norman, Richard ; Kelobonye, Keone ; Xia, Jianhong ; Zhou, Heng ; Nikolova, Gabi ; Hughes, Brett ; Falkmer, Torbjorn.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:137:y:2020:i:c:p:187-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Design of Digital Agricultural Extension Tools: Perspectives from Extension Agents in Nigeria. (2020). Chamberlin, Jordan ; Oyinbo, Oyakhilomen ; Maertens, Miet.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:71:y:2020:i:3:p:798-815.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Consumer preferences for end-use specific curtailable electricity contracts on household appliances during peak load hours. (2019). Bertsch, Valentin ; Harold, Jason ; Fell, Harrison.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:esr:wpaper:wp632.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Threshold incorporating freight choice modeling for hinterland leg transportation chain of export containers. (2019). Zhang, Rong ; Zhu, Lichao.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:130:y:2019:i:c:p:858-872.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Information theoretic-based sampling of observations. (2019). Bliemer, Michiel ; van Cranenburgh, Sander.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:31:y:2019:i:c:p:181-197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. New software tools for creating stated choice experimental designs efficient for regret minimisation and utility maximisation decision rules. (2019). Collins, Andrew ; van Cranenburgh, Sander.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:31:y:2019:i:c:p:104-123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Managing groundwater in a mining region: an opportunity to compare best-worst and referendum data. (2019). Johnston, Robert ; Bark, Rosalind H ; Rose, John M ; Pritchard, Jodie ; MacDonald, Darla Hatton.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:333854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Quantifying benefit losses from poor governance of climate change adaptation projects: A discrete choice experiment with farmers in Kenya. (2018). Markova-Nenova, Nonka ; Nthambi, Mary ; Watzold, Frank.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:94678.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. D-efficient or deficient? A robustness analysis of stated choice experimental designs. (2018). Wang, Yanqiao ; Ben-Akiva, Moshe ; Thorhauge, Mikkel ; Walker, Joan L.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:84:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11238-017-9647-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Public Preferences for the Design of a Farmland Retirement Project: Using Choice Experiments in Urban and Rural Areas of Wuwei, China. (2018). Yin, Zhaowei ; Cai, YU ; Zhao, Minjuan ; Yao, Liuyang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1579-:d:146482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Hypothetical bias and decision-rule effect in modelling discrete directional choices. (2018). Haghani, Milad ; Sarvi, Majid.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:116:y:2018:i:c:p:361-388.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Consumers’ Valuation for Lab Produced Meat: An Investigation of Naming Effects. (2018). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Bazzani, Claudia ; Asioli, Daniele.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:274066.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Detecting dominance in stated choice data and accounting for dominance-based scale differences in logit models. (2017). Rose, John ; Chorus, Caspar ; Bliemer, Michiel.
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:83-104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Divergence in stakeholders preferences: Evidence from a choice experiment on forest landscapes preferences in Sweden. (2017). Nordén, Anna ; Coria, Jessica ; Lehsten, Veiko ; Lagergren, Fredrik ; Norden, Anna ; Jonsson, Anna Maria.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:132:y:2017:i:c:p:179-195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Consumers’ Valuation for Craft Beer: Does the Localness of Inputs Matter?. (2017). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Bazzani, Claudia ; Atallah, Shady ; Ha, Kim.
    In: 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:aaea17:258330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-27 00:31:49 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.