create a website

An assessment of the current use of hybrid choice models in environmental economics, and considerations for future applications. (2024). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Liebe, Ulf ; Artabe, Alaitz ; Mariel, Petr.
In: Journal of choice modelling.
RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:53:y:2024:i:c:s1755534524000526.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 91

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Enhancing waste segregation through non-financial interventions: insights from a randomized controlled trial in a campus setting. (2025). Agrawal, Ankush ; Debnath, Sisir ; Badgujar, Pratik ; Widyatmika, Made Adi ; Bolia, Nomesh Bhojkumar.
    In: Environment Systems and Decisions.
    RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-025-10021-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adamowicz, W. ; Swait, J. ; Boxall, P. ; Louviere, J. ; Williams, M. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. 1997 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 32 65-84

  2. Aldrich, G.A. ; Grimsrud, K.M. ; Thacher, J.A. ; Kotchen, M.J. Relating environmental attitudes and contingent values: how robust are methods for identifying preference heterogeneity?. 2007 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 37 757-775

  3. Amaris, G. ; Hess, S. ; Gironás, J. ; de Dios Ortúzar, J. Using hybrid choice models to capture the impact of attitudes on residential greywater reuse preferences. 2021 Resour. Conserv. Recycl.. 164 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Arrow, K. ; Solow, R. ; Portney, P. ; Leamer, E. ; Radner, R. ; Shuman, H. Report of NOAA Panel on contingent valuation. 1993 Fed. Regist.. 58 4601-4614
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bahamonde-Birke, F.J. ; Kunert, U. ; Link, H. ; Ortúzar, J. de D. About attitudes and perceptions: finding the proper way to consider latent variables in discrete choice models. 2017 Transportation. 44 475-493

  6. Bai, A. ; Czibere, I. ; Kovách, I. ; Megyesi, B. ; Balogh, P. The monetary value of convenience and environmental features in residential heat energy consumption, in particular its social determinants. 2023 Energy Strategy Rev.. 50 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bartczak, A. ; Budziński, W. ; Gołębiowska, B. Impact of beliefs about negative effects of wind turbines on preference heterogeneity regarding renewable energy development in Poland. 2021 Resour. Conserv. Recycl.. 169 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bartczak, A. ; Budziński, W. ; Jusypenko, B. ; Boros, P. The impact of health status and experienced disutility on air quality valuation. 2024 Ecol. Econ.. 217 -

  9. Bartczak, A. ; Mariel, P. ; Chilton, S. ; Meyerhoff, J. The impact of latent risk preferences on valuing the preservation of threatened lynx populations in Poland. 2016 Australian Journal of. 8 21-

  10. Ben-Akiva, M. ; McFadden, D. ; Train, K. Hybrid choice models: progress and challenges. 2002 Market. Lett.. 13 163-175

  11. Bishop, R.C. ; Heberlein, T.A. Measuring values of extramarket goods: are indirect measures biased?. 1979 Am. J. Agric. Econ.. 61 926-930

  12. Bliemer, M.C. ; Collins, A.T. On determining priors for the generation of efficient stated choice experimental designs. 2016 J. Choice Model.. 21 10-14

  13. Bollen, K.A. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. 2002 Annu. Rev. Psychol.. 53 605-634
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Borriello, A. ; Burke, P.F. ; Rose, J.M. If one goes up, another must come down: a latent class hybrid choice modelling approach for understanding electricity mix preferences among renewables and non-renewables. 2021 Energy Pol.. 159 -

  15. Borriello, A. ; Rose, J.M. Global versus localised attitudinal responses in discrete choice. 2019 Transportation. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Boxall, P.C. ; Adamowicz, W.L. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. 2002 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 23 421-446

  17. Boyce, C. ; Czajkowski, M. ; Hanley, N. Personality and economic choices. 2019 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 94 82-100
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Budziński, W. ; Czajkowski, M. Endogeneity and measurement bias of the indicator variables in hybrid choice models: a Monte Carlo investigation. 2022 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 83 605-629

  19. Campbell, D. ; Sandorf, E.D. The use of latent variable models in policy: a road fraught with peril? Bio-based and. 2020 Appl. Econ.. 9 305-324

  20. Cantillo, T. ; Notaro, S. ; Bonini, N. ; Hadjichristidis, C. Assessing Italian household preferences for waste sorting systems: the role of environmental awareness, socioeconomic characteristics, and local contexts. 2023 Waste Manag.. 163 22-33
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Chang, S. ; Benjamin, E. ; Sauer, J. The role of rice farmers' attitude and trust in government in decision-making for participating in a climate-related agri-environmental scheme. 2023 J. Environ. Plann. Manag.. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Choi, A.S. How do attitudes and perceptions affect environmental preferences?. 2021 En : Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Chorus, C.G. ; Kroesen, M. On the (im-)possibility of deriving transport policy implications from hybrid choice models. 2014 Transport Pol.. 36 217-222

  24. Czajkowski, M. ; Hanley, N. ; Nyborg, K. Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviours: the case of household recycling. 2017 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 66 647-670
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Daly, A. ; Hess, S. ; Patruni, B. ; Potoglou, D. ; Rohr, C. Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour. 2012 Transportation. 39 267-297

  26. Daly, A. ; Hess, S. ; Train, K. Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models. 2012 Transportation. 39 19-31

  27. Daziano, R.A. ; Bolduc, D. Covariance, identification, and finite-sample performance of the MSL and Bayes estimators of a logit model with latent attributes. 2013 Transportation. 40 647-670

  28. de Bekker-Grob, E.W. ; Donkers, B. ; Jonker, M.F. ; Stolk, E.A. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. 2015 Patient. 8 373-384

  29. De Salvo, M. ; Grilli, G. ; Notaro, S. ; Signorello, G. Do risk perception and safety of sites influence rock climbing destination choices?. 2022 J. Outdoor Recreat. Tourism. 37 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Dekker, T. ; Hess, S. ; Arentze, T. ; Chorus, C. Incorporating needs-satisfaction in a discrete choice model of leisure activities. 2014 J. Transport Geogr.. 38 66-74

  31. Dekker, T. ; Hess, S. ; Brouwer, R. ; Hofkes, M. Decision uncertainty in multi-attribute stated preference studies. 2016 Resour. Energy Econ.. 43 57-73

  32. Dugstad, A. ; Brouwer, R. ; Grimsrud, K. ; Kipperberg, G. ; Lindhjem, H. ; Navrud, S. Nature is ours! – Psychological ownership and preferences for wind energy. 2024 Energy Econ.. 129 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Dunlap, R.E. ; Liere, K.D.V. The ‘new environmental paradigm’. 2008 J. Environ. Educ.. 40 19-28
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Faccioli, M. ; Czajkowski, M. ; Glenk, K. ; Martin-Ortega, J. Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services. 2020 Ecol. Econ.. 174 -

  35. Fockaert, L. ; Mathijs, E. ; Vranken, L. Citizen support for agri-environmental measures motivated by environmental consciousness. 2023 Landsc. Urban Plann.. 232 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Franceschinis, C. ; Liebe, U. ; Thiene, M. ; Meyerhoff, J. ; Field, D. ; McBratney, A. The effect of social and personal norms on stated preferences for multiple soil functions: evidence from Australia and Italy. 2022 Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ.. 66 335-362

  37. Gibson, F.L. ; Burton, M. Salt or sludge? Exploring preferences for potable water sources. 2014 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 57 453-476

  38. Gosling, S.D. ; Rentfrow, P.J. ; Swann, W.B. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. 2003 J. Res. Pers.. 37 504-528
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Grilli, G. ; Notaro, S. Exploring the influence of an extended theory of planned behaviour on preferences and willingness to pay for participatory natural resources management. 2019 J. Environ. Manag.. 232 902-909
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Grilli, G. ; Notaro, S. ; Campbell, D. Including value orientations in choice models to estimate benefits of wildlife management policies. 2018 Ecol. Econ.. 151 70-81

  41. Groothuis, P.A. ; Mohr, T.M. ; Whitehead, J.C. ; Cockerill, K. ; Anderson, W.P. ; Gu, C. Measuring the direct and indirect effect of scientific information on valuing storm water management programs with a hybrid choice model. 2021 Water Resour. Res.. 57 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Hess, S. ; Beharry-Borg, N. Accounting for latent attitudes in willingness-to-pay studies: the case of coastal water quality improvements in Tobago. 2012 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 52 109-131

  43. Hoyos, D. ; Mariel, P. ; Hess, S. Incorporating environmental attitudes in discrete choice models: an exploration of the utility of the awareness of consequences scale. 2015 Sci. Total Environ.. 505 1100-1111
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Kassahun, H.T. ; Swait, J. ; Jacobsen, J.B. Distortions in willingness-to-pay for public goods induced by endemic distrust in institutions. 2021 J. Choice Model.. 39 -

  45. Kløjgaard, M.E. ; Hess, S. Understanding the formation and influence of attitudes in patients' treatment choices for lower back pain: testing the benefits of a hybrid choice model approach. 2014 Soc. Sci. Med.. 114 138-150

  46. Kotchen, M.J. ; Reiling, S.D. Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. 2000 Ecol. Econ.. 32 93-107

  47. Lahoz, L.T. ; Pereira, F.C. ; Sfeir, G. ; Arkoudi, I. ; Monteiro, M.M. ; Azevedo, C.L. Attitudes and latent class choice models using machine learning. 2023 J. Choice Model.. 49 -

  48. Lehmann, N. ; Sloot, D. ; Ardone, A. ; Fichtner, W. Willingness to pay for regional electricity generation – a question of green values and regional product beliefs?. 2022 Energy Econ.. 110 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Liebe, U. ; Hundeshagen, C. ; Beyer, H. ; von Cramon-Taubadel, S. Context effects and the temporal stability of stated preferences. 2016 Soc. Sci. Res.. 60 135-147
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Liebe, U. ; Mariel, P. ; Beyer, H. ; Meyerhoff, J. Uncovering the nexus between attitudes, preferences, and behavior in sociological applications of stated choice experiments. 2021 Socio. Methods Res.. 50 310-347

  51. Liebe, U. ; Preisendörfer, P. ; Meyerhoff, J. To pay or not to pay: competing theories to explain individuals' willingness to pay for public environmental goods. 2010 Environ. Behav.. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Lindberg, K. ; Veisten, K. ; Halse, A.H. Analyzing the deeper motivations for nature-based tourism facility demand: a hybrid choice model of preferences for a reindeer visitor center. 2019 Scand. J. Hospit. Tourism. 19 157-174
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Long, Y. ; Zheng, D. ; Wei, Y. ; Cai, Z. ; Ye, Y. ; Mao, B. ; Ao, Ch Impact of risk perception on intrapersonal heterogeneity in decision-making processes by air pollution context: a latent variable and latent class regret-utility approach. 2023 J. Clean. Prod.. 428 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Manfredo, M.J. Who Cares about Wildlife?: Social Science Concepts for Exploring Human-Wildlife Relationships and Conservation Issues. 2008 Springer-Verlag:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Mao, B. ; Ao, C. ; Cheng, Y. ; Jiang, N. ; Xu, L. Exploring the role of public risk perceptions on preferences for air quality improvement policies: an integrated choice and latent variable approach. 2020 J. Clean. Prod.. 269 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Mariel, P. ; Demel, S. ; Longo, A. Modelling welfare estimates in discrete choice experiments for seaweed-based renewable energy. 2021 PLoS One. 16 -

  57. Mariel, P. ; Hoyos, D. ; Meyerhoff, J. ; Czajkowski, M. ; Dekker, T. ; Glenk, K. ; Jacobsen, J.B. ; Liebe, U. ; Olsen, S.B. ; Sagebiel, J. ; Thiene, M. Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments , Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis. 2021 Springer:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Mariel, P. ; Meyerhoff, J. Hybrid discrete choice models: gained insights versus increasing effort. 2016 Sci. Total Environ.. 568 433-443
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Mariel, P. ; Meyerhoff, J. ; Hess, S. Heterogeneous preferences toward landscape externalities of wind turbines – combining choices and attitudes in a hybrid model. 2015 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.. 41 647-657
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. McFadden, D. The choice theory approach to market research. 1986 Market. Sci.. 5 275-297

  61. Meginnis, K. ; Domanski, A. ; Toledo-Gallegos, V.M. Is it up to business, governments, or individuals to tackle the marine plastic problem? A hybrid mixed logit approach. 2022 Mar. Pollut. Bull.. 174 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Meldrum, J.R. Comparing different attitude statements in latent class models of stated preferences for managing an invasive forest pathogen. 2015 Ecol. Econ.. 120 13-22

  63. Meyerhoff, J. Stated willingness to pay as hypothetical behaviour: can attitudes tell us more?. 2006 J. Environ. Plann. Manag.. 49 209-226

  64. Morey, E. ; Thacher, J. ; Breffle, W. Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: a latent-class model. 2006 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 34 91-115

  65. Morey, E. ; Thiene, M. ; De Salvo, M. ; Signorello, G. Using attitudinal data to identify latent classes that vary in their preference for landscape preservation. 2008 Ecol. Econ.. 68 536-546

  66. Morikawa, T. ; Ben-Akiva, M. ; McFadden, D. Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data. 2002 Adv. Econom.. 16 29-55
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Motz, A. Consumer acceptance of the energy transition in Switzerland: the role of attitudes explained through a hybrid discrete choice model. 2021 Energy Pol.. 151 -

  68. Owusu-Sekyere, E. ; Mahlathi, Y. ; Jordaan, H. Understanding South African consumers' preferences and market potential for products with low water and carbon footprints. 2019 Agrekon. 58 354-368

  69. Pakalniete, K. ; Aigars, J. ; Czajkowski, M. ; Strake, S. ; Zawojska, E. ; Hanley, N. Understanding the distribution of economic benefits from improving coastal and marine ecosystems. 2017 Sci. Total Environ.. 584–585 29-40
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Raveau, S. ; Yáñez, M.F. ; Ortúzar, J.D. Practical and empirical identifiability of hybrid discrete choice models. 2012 Transport. Res. Part B. 46 1374-1383

  71. Rose, J. ; Borriello, A. ; Pellegrini, A. Formative versus reflective attitude measures: extending the hybrid choice model. 2023 J. Choice Model.. -

  72. Rose, J.M. ; Bliemer, M.C.J. Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments. 2013 Transportation. 40 1021-1041

  73. Ryan, A.M. ; Spash, C.L. The Awareness of Consequences Scale: an exploration, empirical analysis, and reinterpretation. 2012 J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.. 42 2505-2540
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Salak, B. ; Lindberg, K. ; Kienast, F. ; Hunziker, M. How landscape-technology fit affects public evaluations of renewable energy infrastructure scenarios. A hybrid choice model. 2021 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.. 143 -

  75. Schacter, D.L. ; Gilbert, D.T. ; Wegner, D.M. Psychology. 2011 Worth Publishers:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Shmueli, G. To explain or to predict?. 2010 Stat. Sci.. 25 289-310
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Stemmer, K. ; Aas, Ø. ; Veisten, K. ; Lindberg, K. Assessing recreation specialization to guide nature-based tourism development: a hybrid choice model of birder destination preferences. 2022 J. Outdoor Recreat. Tourism. 39 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Strazzera, E. ; Atzori, R. ; Meleddu, D. ; Statzu, V. Assessment of renaturation measures for improvements in ecosystem services and flood risk mitigation. 2021 J. Environ. Manag.. 292 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Strazzera, E. ; Meleddu, D. ; Atzori, R. A hybrid choice modelling approach to estimate the trade-off between perceived environmental risks and economic benefits. 2022 Ecol. Econ.. 196 -

  80. Swait, J. ; Franceschinis, C. ; Thiene, M. Antecedent volition and spatial effects: can multiple goal pursuit mitigate distance decay?. 2019 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 75 243-270
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Taye, F.A. ; Vedel, S.E. ; Jacobsen, J.B. Accounting for environmental attitude to explain variations in willingness to pay for forest ecosystem services using the new environmental paradigm. 2018 J. Environ. Econo. Policy. 7 420-440

  82. Tocock, M. ; Borriello, A. ; Tinch, D. ; Rose, J. ; MacDonald, D. How environmental beliefs influence the acceptance of reallocating government budgets to improving coastal water quality: a hybrid choice model. 2023 Australas. J. Environ. Manag.. 30 348-366
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Tourangeau, R. ; Rips, L.J. ; Rasinski, K. The Psychology of Survey Response. 2000 Cambridge University Press: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Train, K.E. ; McFadden, D.L. ; Goett, A.A. Consumer attitudes and voluntary rate schedules for public utilities. 1987 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 69 383-391

  85. Valasiuk, S. ; Czajkowski, M. ; Giergiczny, M. ; Żylicz, T. ; Veisten, K. ; Landa, I. ; Harkjerr, A. ; Angelstam, P. Attitudinal drivers of home bias in public preferences for transboundary nature protected areas. 2023 Ecol. Econ.. 208 -

  86. Vega-Bayo, A. ; Mariel, P. ; Meyerhoff, J. ; Corsi, A.M. ; Chovan, M. Climate change adaptation preferences of winemakers from the Rioja wine appellation. 2023 J. Choice Model.. 48 -

  87. Vij, A. ; Walker, J.L. How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful. 2016 Transp. Res. Part B Methodol.. 90 192-217

  88. Wei, Y. ; Mao, B. ; Xu, L. ; Ao, C. Accounting for the importance of psychological distance in assessing public preferences for air quality improvement policies: an application of the integrated choice and latent variable model. 2023 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser.. 30 47455-47469
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Welling, M. ; Zawojska, E. ; Sagebiel, J. Information, consequentiality and credibility in stated preference surveys: a choice experiment on climate adaptation. 2022 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 82 257-283

  90. Wu, S. ; Harris, T.J. ; McAuley, K.B. The use of simplified or misspecified models : linear case. 2008 Can. J. Chem. Eng.. 85 386-398
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Zawojska, E. ; Bartczak, A. ; Czajkowski, M. Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences. 2019 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 93 63-84

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes. (2014). Dissanayake, Sahan ; Ando, Amy ; Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:ii:1:p:237-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A Spatial Microsimulation Approach to Estimating the Total Number and Economic Value of Site Visits in Travel Cost Modelling. (2011). Cullinan, John.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:50:y:2011:i:1:p:27-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Do Respondents’ Perceptions of the Status Quo Matter in Non-Market Valuation with Choice Experiments? An Application to New Zealand Freshwater Streams. (2011). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Mkwara, Lena ; Marsh, Dan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:3:y:2011:i:9:p:1593-1615:d:14112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. School Milk Consumption in Germany - What are Important Product Attributes for Children and Parents?. (2011). Weber, Sascha A. ; Salamon, Petra ; Christoph, Inken B. ; Peter, Guenter ; Weible, Daniela ; Rothe, Andrea.
    In: 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
    RePEc:ags:eaae11:114294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Definition and Choice of Environmental Commodities for Nonmarket Valuation. (2009). Boyd, James ; Krupnick, Alan.
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-09-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Defining environmental attributes as external costs in choice experiments: A discussion. (2009). Riera Font, Antoni ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M..
    In: CRE Working Papers (Documents de treball del CRE).
    RePEc:pdm:wpaper:2009/1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. A Choice Modelling Survey of Community Attitudes to Improvements in Environmental Quality in NSW Catchments. (2009). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Mazur, Kasia .
    In: Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports.
    RePEc:een:eenhrr:0913.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. A Choice Modelling Survey of Community Attitudes to Improvements in Environmental Quality in NSW Catchments. (2009). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Mazur, Kasia .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:eerhrr:94813.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Enriching Stakeholder participation through Environmental Valuation; Eliciting Preferences for a National Park Designation in Northern Ireland. (2009). Longo, Alberto ; Rowan, Emma .
    In: 83rd Annual Conference, March 30 - April 1, 2009, Dublin, Ireland.
    RePEc:ags:aesc09:51071.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Contingent behavior and odor nuisances. The case of Le Cortine selection and composting plant in the Province of Siena. (2008). Ferrini, Silvia ; Bimonte, Salvatore ; Baccheschi, Alice.
    In: Department of Economics University of Siena.
    RePEc:usi:wpaper:542.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Comparing Willingness-to-Pay and Subjective Well-Being in the Context of Non-Market Goods. (2008). Metcalfe, Robert ; Dolan, Paul.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0890.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Fire and Recreational Values in Fire-Prone Forests: Exploring an Intertemporal Amenity Function Using Pooled RP-SP Data. (2008). Englin, Jeffrey ; Boxall, Peter.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:36703.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: Risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention. (2007). Gerdes, Geoffrey ; Cameron, Trudy ; Burghart, Daniel.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:35:y:2007:i:1:p:77-105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Up the Proverbial Creek without a Paddle: Accounting for Variable Participant Skill Levels in Recreational Demand Modelling. (2007). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:36:y:2007:i:4:p:413-426.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Van Houtven, George L. ; Gelso, Brett R..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Investigation of Stated and Revealed Preferences for an Elk Hunting Raffle. (2006). Grimsrud, Kristine ; Berrens, Robert ; Champ, Patricia A. ; Little, Joseph M..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:4:p:623-640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Up the proverbial creek without a paddle: Accounting for variable participant skill levels in recreational demand modelling.. (2006). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Garvey, Eoghan .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tea:wpaper:0604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Combining revealed and stated preference methods to assess the private value of agrobiodiversity in Hungarian home gardens:. (2006). Smale, Melinda ; KONTOLEON, ANDREAS ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: EPTD discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:eptddp:156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A Choice-Based Conjoint Experiment with Genetically Engineered Cotton in the Mississippi Delta. (2006). Hudson, Darren ; Banerjee, Swagata Ban ; Martin, Steven W..
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saeaso:35389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The Role of Water Quality Perceptions in Modeling Lake Recreation Demand. (2005). Kling, Catherine ; Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik ; Downing, John.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12474.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Aggregation Bias in Recreation Site Choice Models: Resolving the Resolution Problem. (2004). Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Haener, M. K. ; Kuhnke, D. H..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:80:y:2004:i:4:p561-574.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael ; Provencher, Bill.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. A HIERARCHICAL BAYES APPROACH TO MODELING CHOICE DATA: A STUDY OF WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAMS. (2004). Kramer, Randall ; Eisen-Hecht, Jonathan I. ; Huber, Joel.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20253.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A CHOICE EXPERIMENT MODEL FOR BEEF ATTRIBUTES: WHAT CONSUMER PREFERENCES TELL US. (2004). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach. (2002). Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:23:y:2002:i:4:p:421-446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The Impact of Choice Inconsistencies in Stated Choice Studies. (2002). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:23:y:2002:i:4:p:403-420.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Modelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland. (2002). Wright, Robert ; Koop, Gary ; Hanley, Nick.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:449-466.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Valuing the Benefits of Coastal Water Quality Improvements using Contingent and Real Behaviour. (2002). Hanley, Nick ; Alvarez-Farizo, Begona.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gla:glaewp:2002_9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. CANADIAN WHEAT EXPORT PROSPECTS IN THE ASIAN NOODLE MARKET: ANALYZING JAPAN AND KOREAN MILLING INDUSTRIES. (2002). Kim, R. B. ; Veeman, M. M. ; Unterschultz, J. R..
    In: Project Report Series.
    RePEc:ags:ualbpr:24055.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. ASSESSING IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ON ABORIGINAL PEOPLE: AN ECONOMIC EXAMINATION OF SUBSISTENCE RESOURCE USE AND VALUE. (2002). Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Haener, Michel ; Marois, Juanita ; Dosman, Donna.
    In: Project Report Series.
    RePEc:ags:ualbpr:24034.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Valuing Bundled Attributes: A Latent Characteristics Approach. (2001). Shonkwiler, J ; Pendleton, Linwood H..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:77:y:2001:i:1:p:118-129.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Inconsistent choices in Stated Choice data;Use of the logit scaling approach to handle resulting variance increases. (2001). Salensminde, Kjartan .
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:28:y:2001:i:3:p:269-296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. ABSOLUTE VERSUS RELATIVE RISK PERCEPTIONS: AN APPLICATION TO ECONOMIC VALUES OF SEAFOOD SAFETY. (2001). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20731.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. DEMAND FOR BEEF FROM CATTLE ADMINISTERED GROWTH HORMONES OR FED GENETICALLY MODIFIED CORN: A COMPARISON OF CONSUMERS IN FRANCE, GERMANY, THE UNITED KINGDOM, AND THE UNITED STATES. (2001). Roosen, Jutta ; Lusk, Jayson ; Fox, John.
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20684.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. “Absolute versus Relative Risk Perception: An Application to Seafood Safety,”. (2000). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:0010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple‐format, stated‐preference approach. (2000). Desvousges, William H. ; JOHNSON, REED F. ; Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. JAPANESE MILLERS PREFERENCES FOR WHEAT AND FLOUR: A STATED PREFERENCE ANALYSIS. (2000). Kim, Renee B. ; Veeman, Michele ; Unterschultz, James.
    In: 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    RePEc:ags:waeava:36403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. THE EFFECT OF THE NUMBER OF CHOICE SETS ON RESPONSES IN A STATED CHOICE SURVEY. (2000). Shortle, James ; Heberling, Matthew ; Fisher, Ann.
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. CONSUMER VALUATION OF BEEF RIBEYE STEAK ATTRIBUTES. (2000). Lusk, Jayson ; Fox, John.
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21793.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Measuring Recreation Benefits of Quality Improvements with Revealed and Stated Behavior Data. (1999). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9902.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment. (1998). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:11:y:1998:i:3:p:413-428.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. ASSESSING OPT-OUT FORMATS FOR DISCRETE-CHOICE STATED PREFERENCES: RESULTS FROM A SALTWATER ANGLING SURVEY. (1998). JOHNSON, REED F. ; Ruby, Melissa C. ; Mathews, Kristy E..
    In: 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT.
    RePEc:ags:aaea98:20807.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-29 23:26:19 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.