create a website

The Relevance of Attitudinal Factors for the Acceptance of Energy Policy Measures: A Micro-econometric Analysis. (2019). Ziegler, Andreas.
In: Ecological Economics.
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:157:y:2019:i:c:p:129-140.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 31

Citations received by this document

Cites: 63

References cited by this document

Cocites: 24

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The relationship between FinTech and energy markets in China. (2025). Huang, Yunying ; Yang, Cunyi ; Albitar, Khaldoon ; Zhou, QI.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525002197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The relevance of non-state climate protection activities as motivation for individual climate protection: Results from a framed field experiment. (2025). Luigs, Theresa ; Gleue, Marvin ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0928765524000496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Determinants of pollutant emissions in the Spanish agri-food sector: The role of international trade. (2025). Galdeano-Gmez, Emilio ; Garca-Granero, Eva M ; Sorroche-Del, Yolanda ; Piedra-Muoz, Laura.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:71:y:2025:i:3:id:353-2024-agricecon.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Self-interest and support of climate-related transport policy measures: An empirical analysis for citizens in Germany and Sweden. (2024). Straubinger, Anna ; Habla, Wolfgang ; Ziegler, Andreas ; Lofgren, SA ; Kokash, Kumai.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:300007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. How Do We Move towards a Greener and Socially Equitable Future? Identifying the Trade-Offs of Accepted CO 2 Pricing Revenues in Germany. (2024). Wilkowska, Wiktoria ; Frank, Mona ; Ziefle, Martina ; Kluge, Johanna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3378-:d:1377698.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How to promote the trading in Chinas green electricity market? Based on environmental perceptions, renewable portfolio standard and subsidies. (2024). Shi, Yanmin ; Wang, Xinru ; Yang, Shuhan ; Long, Ruyin ; Wu, Meifen ; Chen, Hong.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:222:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123016993.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The relevance of proximity and work-related experience for the individual support for the expansion of power plants: An empirical analysis of wind, coal, and nuclear energy. (2024). Luigs, Theresa ; Kanberger, Elke D ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Ecological-behavioral economics: Impact of information on energy-renovation decision through third-party investing. (2024). Flambard, Véronique ; Fateh, BELAID ; Belaid, Fateh.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:221:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924000934.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Attitudinal Factors Associated with the Use of Bicycles and Electric Scooters. (2023). Franco-Castao, Sebastian ; Rodriguez-Correa, Paula Andrea ; Barandiaran-Gamarra, Jose Manuel ; Bermudez-Hernandez, Jonathan ; Valencia-Arias, Alejandro.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8191-:d:1149618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Determinants of individual sustainable investment behavior - A framed field experiment. (2023). Wetzel, Heike ; Gutsche, Gunnar ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:209:y:2023:i:c:p:491-508.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. On the preferences for an environmentally friendly and fair energy transition: A stated choice experiment for Germany. (2023). Kanberger, Elke D ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:182:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. On the relationship between corporate CO2 offsetting and pro-environmental activities in small- and medium-sized firms in Germany. (2023). Gutsche, Gunnar ; Engler, Daniel ; Ziegler, Andreas ; Simixhiu, Amantia.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:118:y:2023:i:c:s0140988322006168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Whats in it for me? Self-interest and preferences for distribution of costs and benefits of energy efficiency policies. (2023). Schleich, Joachim ; Fanghella, Valeria ; Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte ; Faure, Corinne.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:204:y:2023:i:pa:s0921800922003202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Household acceptability of energy efficiency policies in the European Union: Policy characteristics trade-offs and the role of trust in government and environmental identity. (2022). TU, Gengyang ; Schleich, Joachim ; Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte ; Whitmarsh, Lorraine ; Faure, Corinne ; Whittle, Colin.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:192:y:2022:i:c:s0921800921003268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. On the relevance of values, norms, and economic preferences for electricity consumption. (2022). Groh, Elke D ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:192:y:2022:i:c:s0921800921003232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Whats in it for me? Self-interest and preferences for distribution of costs and benefits of energy efficiency policies. (2021). Schleich, Joachim ; Fanghella, Valeria ; Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte ; Faure, Corinne.
    In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
    RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s092021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Individual Sustainable Investment in Japan. (2021). Arimura, Toshi ; Nakai, Miwa ; Gutsche, Gunnar.
    In: RIEEM Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:was:dpaper:2006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Corporate CO2 offsetting in small- and medium-sized firms in Germany. (2021). Gutsche, Gunnar ; Engler, Daniel ; Ziegler, Andreas ; Simixhiu, Amantia.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. On the relevance of values, norms, and economic preferences for electricity consumption. (2021). Groh, Elke D ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. If one goes up, another must come down: A latent class hybrid choice modelling approach for understanding electricity mix preferences among renewables and non-renewables. (2021). Burke, Paul F ; Rose, John M ; Borriello, Antonio.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:159:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521004778.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Who supports which low-carbon transport policies? Characterizing heterogeneity among Canadian citizens. (2021). Long, Zoe ; Kitt, Shelby ; Axsen, Jonn.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:155:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521001713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Farm households perception of weather change and flood adaptations in northern Pakistan. (2021). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Aftab, Ashar ; Ahmed, Ajaz.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:182:y:2021:i:c:s0921800919309590.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Revisiting the determinants of individual sustainable investment—The case of Japan. (2021). Arimura, Toshi ; Nakai, Miwa ; Gutsche, Gunnar.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
    RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:30:y:2021:i:c:s2214635021000411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. How relevant are economic preferences and personality traits for individual sustainable investment behavior? A framed field experiment. (2020). Wetzel, Heike ; Gutsche, Gunnar ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc20:224542.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Determinants of individual sustainable investment behavior - A framed field experiment. (2020). Wetzel, Heike ; Gutsche, Gunnar ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202033.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Acceptance of climate-oriented policy measures in times of the COVID-19 crisis. (2020). Gutsche, Gunnar ; Groh, Elke D ; Engler, Daniel ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202029.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Who wants to get involved? Determinants of citizens€™ willingness to participate in German renewable energy cooperatives. (2020). Wetzel, Heike ; Gutsche, Gunnar ; Fischer, Beate.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Behavioral attitudes towards energy saving: Empirical evidence from France. (2020). Fateh, BELAID ; Belaid, Fateh ; Joumni, Haitham.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03052065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Public support for supply-focused transport policies: Vehicle emissions, low-carbon fuels, and ZEV sales standards in Canada and California. (2020). Long, Zoe ; Kitt, Shelby ; Axsen, Jonn.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:141:y:2020:i:c:p:98-115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Behavioral attitudes towards energy saving: Empirical evidence from France. (2020). Fateh, BELAID ; Joumni, Haitham ; Belaid, Fateh.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:140:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520301609.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. What shapes the support of renewable energy expansion? Public attitudes between policy goals and risk, time, and social preferences. (2020). Groh, Elke D ; Mollendorff, Charlotte V.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519307578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Ščasný, M. ; Zvěřinová, I. ; Czajkowski, M. ; Kyselá, E. ; Zagórska, K. Public acceptability of climate change mitigation policies: a discrete choice experiment. 2017 Clim. Pol.. S111-S130

  2. Andor, M. ; Frondel, M. ; Rinne, S. Wie unbeliebt ist Kohle und wie beliebt sind die Erneuerbaren?. 2016 En : Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Attari, S.Z. ; Schoen, M. ; Davidson, C.I. ; DeKay, M.L. ; de Druin, W.B. ; Dawes, R. ; Small, M.J. Preferences for change: do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption. 2009 Ecol. Econ.. 68 1701-1710

  4. Börsch-Supan, A. ; Hajivassiliou, V.A. Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models. 1993 J. Econ.. 58 347-368

  5. BDEW (Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V.), Der BDEW-Energiemonitor 2015: Das Meinungsbild der Bevölkerung. 2015 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. BDEW (Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V.), Der BDEW-Energiemonitor 2018: Das Meinungsbild der Bevölkerung. 2018 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Borgers, A. ; Derwall, J. ; Koedijk, K. ; ter Host, J. Do social factors influence investment behaviour and performance? Evidence from mutual fund holdings. 2015 J. Bank. Financ.. 60 112-126

  8. Bornstein, N. ; Lanz, B. Voting on the environment: Price or ideology? Evidence from Swiss referendums. 2008 Ecol. Econ.. 67 430-440

  9. Bristow, A.L. ; Wardman, M. ; Zanni, A.M. ; Chintakayala, P.K. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 1824-1837

  10. Carlsson, F. ; Kataria, M. ; Krupnik, A. ; Lampi, E. ; Löfgren, Å. ; Qin, P. ; Chung, S. ; Sterner, T. Paying for mitigation: a multiple country study. 2012 Land Econ.. 88 326-340

  11. Carlsson, F. ; Kataria, M. ; Krupnik, A. ; Lampi, E. ; Löfgren, Å. ; Qin, P. ; Sterner, T. A fair share: burden-sharing preferences in the United States and China. 2013 Resour. Energy Econ.. 35 1-17

  12. Carlsson, F. ; Kataria, M. ; Lampi, E. ; Löfgren, Å. ; Sterner, T. Is fairness blind? The effect of framing on preferences for effort-sharing rules. 2011 Ecol. Econ.. 70 1529-1535

  13. Carratini, S. ; Baranzini, A. ; Thalmann, P. ; Varone, F. ; Vöhringer, F. Green taxes in a post-Paris world: are millions of nays inevitable?. 2017 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 68 97-128

  14. Contu, D. ; Strazzera, E. ; Mourato, S. Modeling individual preferences for energy sources: the case of IV generation nuclear energy in Italy. 2016 Ecol. Econ.. 127 37-58

  15. Costa, D.L. ; Kahn, M.E. Do liberal home owners consume less electricity? A test of the voluntary restraint hypothesis. 2013 Econ. Lett.. 119 210-212

  16. Cui, J. ; Jo, H. ; Velasquez, M.G. The influence of Christian religiosity on managerial decisions concerning the environment. 2015 J. Bus. Ethics. 132 203-231

  17. Dastrup, S.R. ; Zivin, J.G. ; Costa, D.L. ; Kahn, M.E. Understanding the solar home price premium: electricity generation and “green” social status. 2012 Eur. Econ. Rev.. 56 961-973

  18. Delmas, M.A. ; Lessem, N. Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information. 2014 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 67 353-370

  19. Dietz, S. ; Atkinson, G. The equity-efficiency trade-off in environmental policy: evidence from stated preferences. 2010 Land Econ.. 86 423-443

  20. Drews, S. ; van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. 2016 Clim. Pol.. 16 855-876

  21. Dunlap, R.E. ; Van Liere, K.D. ; Mertig, A.G. ; Jones, R.E. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. 2000 J. Soc. Issues. 56 425-442
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Sixth “Energy Transition” Monitoring Report "The Energy of the Future". 2018 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Frondel, M. ; Sommer, S. ; Vance, C. The burden of Germany's energy transition: an empirical analysis of distributional effects. 2015 Econ. Anal. Policy. 45 89-99

  24. Gampfer, R. Do individuals care about fairness in burden sharing for climate change mitigation? Evidence from a lab experiment. 2014 Clim. Chang.. 124 65-77

  25. Gawel, E. ; Korte, K. ; Tews, K. Distributional challenges of sustainability policies - the case of the German energy transition. 2015 Sustainability. 7 16599-16615

  26. Gevrek, Z.E. ; Uyduranoglu, A. Public preferences for carbon tax attributes. 2015 Ecol. Econ.. 118 186-197

  27. Geweke, J. ; Keane, M. ; Runkle, D. Alternative computational approaches to inference in the multinomial model. 1994 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 76 609-632

  28. Guagnano, G.A. ; Stern, P.C. ; Dietz, T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: a natural experiment with curbside recycling. 1995 Environ. Behav.. 27 699-718
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Gutsche, G. Individual and regional Christian religion and the consideration of sustainable criteria in consumption and investment decisions: an exploratory econometric analysis. 2018 J. Bus. Ethics. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hammar, H. ; Jagers, S.C. Can trust in politicians explain individuals' support for climate policy? The case of CO2 tax. 2006 Clim. Pol.. 5 613-625
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Hilary, G. ; Hui, K.W. Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America?. 2009 J. Financ. Econ.. 93 455-473

  32. Hood, M. ; Nofsinger, J.R. ; Varma, A. Conservation, discrimination, and salvation: investors' social concerns in the stock market. 2014 J. Financ. Serv. Res.. 45 5-37

  33. Jagers, S.C. ; Löfgren, A. ; Stripple, J. Attitudes to personal allowances: political trust, fairness and ideology. 2010 Clim. Pol.. 10 410-431

  34. Kahn, M.E. Demographic change and the demand for environmental regulation. 2002 J. Policy Anal. Manage.. 21 45-62

  35. Kahn, M.E. Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. 2007 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 54 129-145

  36. Kahn, M.E. ; Matsusaka, J.G. Demand for environmental goods: evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. 1997 J. Law Econ.. 40 137-173

  37. Kallbekken, S. ; Sælen, H. Public acceptance for environmental taxes: self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. 2011 Energy Policy. 39 2966-2973

  38. Keane, M. A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data. 1994 Econometrica. 62 95-116

  39. Kotchen, M.J. ; Moore, M.R. Private provision of environmental public goods: household participation in green-electricity programs. 2007 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 53 1-16

  40. Kotchen, M.J. ; Reiling, S.D. Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. 2000 Ecol. Econ.. 32 93-107

  41. Kumar, A. Who gambles in the stock market?. 2009 J. Financ.. 64 1889-1933

  42. Kumar, A. ; Page, J.K. Deviations from norms and informed trading. 2014 J. Financ. Quant. Anal.. 49 1005-1037

  43. Kumar, A. ; Page, J.K. ; Spalt, O.G. Religious beliefs, gambling attitudes, and financial market outcomes. 2011 J. Financ. Econ.. 102 671-708

  44. Lange, A. ; Schwirplies, C. ; Ziegler, A. On the interrelation between the consumption of impure public goods and direct donations: theory and empirical evidence. 2017 Resour. Energy Econ.. 47 72-88

  45. Lee, T.M. ; Markowitz, E.M. ; Howe, P.D. ; Ko, C.-Y. ; Leiserowitz, A.A. Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. 2015 Nat. Clim. Chang.. 5 1014-1020

  46. Martin, W.C. ; Bateman, C.R. Consumer religious commitment's influence on ecocentric attitudes and behavior. 2014 J. Bus. Res.. 67 5-11

  47. Moulton, B.R. An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. 1990 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 72 334-338

  48. Renneboog, L. ; Spaenjers, C. Religion, economic attitudes, and household finance. 2012 Oxf. Econ. Pap.. 64 103-127

  49. Rhodes, E. ; Axsen, J. ; Jaccard, M. Exploring citizen support for different types of climate policy. 2017 Ecol. Econ.. 137 56-69

  50. Roodman, D. Estimating fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. 2011 Stata J.. 11 159-206

  51. Saelen, H. ; Kallbekken, S. A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway. 2011 Ecol. Econ.. 70 2181-2190

  52. Schwirplies, C. ; Ziegler, A. Offset carbon emissions or pay a price premium for avoiding them? A cross-country analysis of motives for climate protection. 2016 Appl. Econ.. 48 746-758

  53. Shin, J. ; Woo, J. ; Huh, S.-Y. ; Lee, J. ; Jeong, G. Analyzing public preferences and increasing acceptability for the Renewable Portfolio Standard in Korea. 2014 Energy Econ.. 42 17-26

  54. Shu, T. ; Sulaeman, J. ; Yeung, P.E. Local religious beliefs and mutual fund risk-taking bahaviors. 2012 Manag. Sci.. 58 1779-1796

  55. Statistisches Bundesamt and Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Datenreport 2013: Ein Sozialbericht für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 2013 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Stern, P.C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. 2000 J. Soc. Issues. 56 407-424
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Strunz, S. The German energy transition as a regime shift. 2014 Ecol. Econ.. 100 150-158

  58. Thalmann, P. The public acceptance of green taxes: 2 million voters express their opinion. 2004 Public Choice. 119 179-217

  59. Unsworth, K.L. ; Fielding, K.S. It's political: how the salience of one's political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. 2014 Glob. Environ. Chang.. 27 131-137
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Whitmarsh, L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. 2008 J. Risk Res.. 11 351-374

  61. Whitmarsh, L. Skepticism and uncertainty about global climate change: dimensions, determinants and change over time. 2011 Glob. Environ. Chang.. 21 690-700
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Wu, X. ; Cutter, B. Who votes for public environmental goods in California? Evidence from a spatial analysis of voting for environmental ballot measures. 2011 Ecol. Econ.. 70 554-563

  63. Ziegler, A. Political orientation, environmental values, and climate change beliefs and attitudes: an empirical cross country analysis. 2017 Energy Econ.. 63 144-153

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. International Climate Justice: What the People Think. (2025). Mjean, Aurlie ; Kervinio, Yann ; Meilland, Auriane.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:88:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-024-00931-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Cost vector effects in forced-choice discrete choice experiments: Assessing the acceptability of future glyphosate policies. (2025). Martinet, Vincent ; David, Maa ; Mermet-Bijon, Vincent ; Dit, Romain Crastes.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:55:y:2025:i:c:s1755534525000132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for EV charging: Implications for incentives to promote off-peak charging and renewables integration. (2025). Steren, Aviv ; Zemah-Shamir, Shiri ; Teschner, Na'Ama ; Parag, Yael.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:392:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925007111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. International Climate Justice: What the People Think. (2024). Mjean, Aurlie ; Kervinio, Yann ; Meilland, Auriane.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04825108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. How to finance green investments? The role of public debt. (2024). Collewet, Marion ; Digiuseppe, Matthew ; Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw ; Vrijburg, Hendrik.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523004846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Renewable gases in the heating market: Identifying consumer preferences through a Discrete Choice Experiment. (2024). Kurz, Peter ; Herbes, Carsten ; Rilling, Benedikt.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523004421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Is carbon footprint reduction always preferred over offsetting? An analysis of tourists preferences in the Mallorca region. (2024). Bujosa Bestard, Angel ; Femenias, Lloren B ; Font, Antoni Riera.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:1371-1381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. How to Prevent Yellow Vests? Evaluating Preferences for a Carbon Tax with a Discrete Choice Experiment. (2023). Sokolowski, Jakub ; Lewandowski, Piotr ; Frankowski, Jan ; Sokoowski, Jakub.
    In: IBS Working Papers.
    RePEc:ibt:wpaper:wp032023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Green Deal and Carbon Neutrality Assessment of Czechia. (2023). Ščasný, Milan ; Rečka, Lukáš ; Maca, Vojtch ; Reka, Luka.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2152-:d:1077604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Give citizens a task: An innovative tool to compose policy bundles that reach the climate goal. (2023). Peer, Stefanie ; Hossinger, Reinhard ; Juschten, Maria.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:173:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423001143.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. On the preferences for an environmentally friendly and fair energy transition: A stated choice experiment for Germany. (2023). Kanberger, Elke D ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:182:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Whats in it for me? Self-interest and preferences for distribution of costs and benefits of energy efficiency policies. (2023). Schleich, Joachim ; Fanghella, Valeria ; Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte ; Faure, Corinne.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:204:y:2023:i:pa:s0921800922003202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Whats in it for me? Self-interest and preferences for distribution of costs and benefits of energy efficiency policies. (2021). Schleich, Joachim ; Fanghella, Valeria ; Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte ; Faure, Corinne.
    In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
    RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s092021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Lancsar, Emily ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:41:y:2021:i:c:s1755534521000427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Bridging the ideological gap? How fairness perceptions mediate the effect of revenue recycling on public support for carbon taxes in the United States, Canada and Germany. (2021). Jagers, Sverker C ; Matti, Simon ; Martinsson, Johan ; Lachapelle, Erick.
    In: Review of Policy Research.
    RePEc:bla:revpol:v:38:y:2021:i:5:p:529-554.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2102.02945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation. (2020). TSINASLANIDIS, PRODROMOS ; Guijarro, Francisco.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2386-:d:339602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Interpreting correlated random parameters in choice experiments. (2020). Mariel, Petr ; Artabe, Alaitz.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:103:y:2020:i:c:s0095069620300863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Nudging Acceptability for Wood Ash Recycling in Forests: A Choice Experiment. (2020). Abildtrup, Jens ; Ouvrard, Benjamin ; Stenger, Anne.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:177:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919310444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Planning on a wider scale – Swedish forest owners preferences for landscape policy attributes. (2019). Ekvall, Hans ; Bostedt, Goran ; Zabel, Astrid.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:104:y:2019:i:c:p:170-181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The Relevance of Attitudinal Factors for the Acceptance of Energy Policy Measures: A Micro-econometric Analysis. (2019). Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:157:y:2019:i:c:p:129-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Social Valuation of Genebank Activities: Assessing Public Demand for Genetic Resource Conservation in the Czech Republic. (2018). Ščasný, Milan ; Tyack, Nicholas.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3997-:d:179837.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Policy- v. individual heterogeneity in the benefits of climate change mitigation: Evidence from a stated-preference survey. (2018). Ščasný, Milan ; Bigano, Andrea ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:121:y:2018:i:c:p:565-575.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. On self-interested preferences for burden sharing rules: An econometric analysis for the costs of energy policy measures. (2018). Groh, Elke D ; Ziegler, Andreas.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:74:y:2018:i:c:p:417-426.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-25 18:55:24 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.