This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abramo, G. ; D'Angelo, C.A. ; Caprasecca, A The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity. 2009 Scientometrics. 81 137-156

2. Abramo, G. ; D'Angelo, C.A. ; Di Costa, F. Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?. 2011 Scientometrics. 88 915-928

3. Abramo, G. ; D'Angelo, C.A. ; Soldatenkova, A. How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: Evidence from Italy. 2017 Scientometrics. 110 867-877

4. Agrawal, A. ; McHale, J. ; Oettl, A. How stars matter: Recruiting and peer effects in evolutionary biology. 2017 Research Policy. 46 853-867

5. Aguinis, H. ; O'Boyle, E Star performers in twenty-first century organizations. 2014 Personnel Psychology. 67 313-350
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Allison, P.D. Fixed effects regression models. 2000 Sage:
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Allison, P.D. Inequality and scientific productivity. 1980 Social Studies of Science. 10 163-179
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Allison, P.D. ; Stewart, J.A. Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. 1974 American Sociological Review. 39 596-606
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Antonowicz, D. ; Kulczycki, E. ; Budzanowska, A. Breaking the deadlock of mistrust? A participative model of the structural reforms in higher education in Poland. 2020 Higher Education Quarterly. 74 391-409
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Carrasco, R. ; Ruiz-Castillo, J. The evolution of the scientific productivity of highly productive economists. 2014 Economic Inquiry. 52 1-16

11. Cole, J.R. ; Cole, S. Social stratification in science. 1973 University of Chicago Press:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Cortés, L.M. ; Mora-Valencia, A. ; Perote, J. The productivity of top researchers: A semi-nonparametric approach. 2016 Scientometrics. 109 891-915

13. Crane, D. Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. 1965 American Sociological Review. 30 699-714
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. David, P.A. (1994). Positive feedbacks and research productivity in science: Reopening another black box. In O. Granstrand (Ed.), Economics of technology (pp. 65–89). Elsevier.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Donina, D. ; Pokorska, A. ; Antonowicz, D. ; Jaworska, M. A cultural perspective of higher education governance reform in Poland: Divergent interpretations by rectors across distinct categories of universities. 2022 Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 44 596-612
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Dotson, D.S. Mega-authorship implications: How many scientists can fit into one cell?. 2024 Accountability in Research. 1-24
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Fernández-Val, I. ; Weidner, M. Individual and time effects in nonlinear panel models with large N, T. 2016 Journal of Econometrics. 192 291-312

18. Fox, M.F. ; Mohapatra, S. Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. 2007 Journal of Higher Education. 78 542-571

19. Fox, M.F. ; Nikivincze, I. Being highly prolific in academic science: Characteristics of individuals and their departments. 2021 Higher Education. 81 1237-1255
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Gomez-Mejia, L.R. ; Balkin, D.B. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. 1992 Academy of Management Journal. 35 921-955
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Halevi, G. ; Moed, H.F. ; Bar-Ilan, J. Researchers’ mobility, productivity and impact: Case of top producing authors in seven disciplines. 2015 Publishing Research Quarterly. 32 22-37
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Hermanowicz, J. (2012). The sociology of academic careers: Problems and prospects. In J.C. Smart & M.B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research 27 (pp. 207–248). Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Hinz, J., A. Stammann, and J. Wanner (2020). State dependence and unobserved heterogeneity in the extensive margin of trade. ArXiv e-prints.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Ioannidis, J.P. ; Klavans, R. ; Boyack, K.W. Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. 2018 Nature. 561 167-169

25. Ioannidis, J.P.A. ; Boyack, K.W. ; Klavans, R. Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce. 2014 PLOSOne. -

26. Kelchtermans, S. ; Veugelers, R. Top research productivity and its persistence: Gender as a double-edged sword. 2013 Review of Economics and Statistics. 95 273-285

27. Kiewra, K.A. ; Creswell, J.W. Conversations with three highly productive educational psychologists: Richard Anderson, Richard Mayer, and Michael Pressley. 2000 Educational Psychology Review. 12 135-161
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Kwiek, M. Academic top earners. Research productivity, prestige generation and salary patterns in European universities. 2018 Science and Public Policy. 45 1-13

29. Kwiek, M. High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers?. 2018 Scientometrics. 115 415-462

30. Kwiek, M. The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics across 11 European systems. 2016 Higher Education. 71 379-397
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Kwiek, M. ; Roszka, W. Academic vs. biological age in research on academic careers: A large-scale study with implications for scientifically developing systems. 2022 Scientometrics. 127 3543-3575

32. Kwiek, M. ; Roszka, W. Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration. 2021 Journal of Informetrics. 15 1-38

33. Kwiek, M. ; Roszka, W. Once highly productive, forever highly productive? Full professors’ research productivity from a longitudinal perspective. 2024 Higher Education. 87 519-549
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Kwiek, M. ; Szymula, L. Young male and female scientists: A quantitative exploratory study of the changing demographics of the global scientific workforce. 2023 Quantitative Science Studies. 4 902-937
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Kwiek, M., & Szymula, L. (2024b). Quantifying Lifetime Productivity Changes: A Longitudinal Study of 320,000 Late-Career Scientists. Preprint available from SocArXiv. doi:10.31235/osf.io/y2a5e.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Kyvik, S. Productivity differences fields of learning, and Lotka's law. 1989 Scientometrics. 15 205-214
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Larivière, V. ; Gingras, Y. The Impact Factor's Matthew Effect. A natural experiment in bibliometrics. 2010 Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61 424-427

38. Leisyte, L. ; Dee, J.D. Understanding academic work in changing institutional environment. 2012 Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. 27 123-206
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Mayrath, M.C. Attributions of productive authors in educational psychology journals. 2008 Educational Psychology Review. 20 41-56
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Nygaard, L.P. ; Aksnes, D.W. ; Piro, F.N. Identifying gender disparities in research performance: The importance of comparing apples with apples. 2022 Higher Education. 84 1127-1142
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. O'Boyle, E. ; Aguinis, H. The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. 2012 Personnel Psychology. 65 79-119
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

42. Parker, J.N. ; Lortie, C. ; Allesina, S. Characterizing a scientific elite: The social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. 2010 Scientometrics. 85 129-143

43. Piro, F.N. ; Rørstad, K. ; Aksnes, D.W. How do prolific professors influence the citation impact of their university departments?. 2016 Scientometrics. 107 941-961
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Rosen, S. The economics of superstars. 1981 The American Economic Review. 71 846-858
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Ruiz-Castillo, J. ; Costas, R. The skewness of scientific productivity. 2014 Journal of Informetrics. 8 917-934

46. Seglen, P.O. The skewness of science. 1992 Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43 628-638

47. Serenko, A. ; Cox, R.A.K. ; Bontis, N. ; Booker, L.D. The superstar phenomenon in the knowledge management and intellectual capital academic discipline. 2011 Journal of Informetrics. 5 333-345

48. Sidiropoulos, A. ; Gogoglou, A. ; Katsaros, D. ; Manolopoulos, Y. Gazing at the skyline for star scientists. 2016 Journal of Informetrics. 10 789-813

49. Stammann, A. (2018). Fast and feasible estimation of generalized linear models with high dimensional k-way fixed effects. ArXiv e-prints.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Stephan, P. How economics shapes science. 2012 Harvard University Press:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Tang, L. ; Horta, H. Supporting academic women's careers: Male and female academics’ perspectives at a Chinese research university. 2023 Minerva. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Turner, L. ; Mairesse, J. Individual productivity differences in public research: How important are non-individual determinants? An econometric study of French physicists’ publications and citations (1986–1997). 2005 CNRS:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Weingart, P. Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?. 2004 En : Moed, H.F. ; Glänzel, W. ; Schmoch, U. Handbook on quantitative science and technology research. Kluwer Academic Publishers:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Xie, Y. ‘Undemocracy’: Inequalities in science. 2014 Science (New York, N.Y.). 344 809-810
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate and compare research productivity of Italian academic statisticians. (2024). Negri, Ilia ; Mezzetti, Maura.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05154-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Evaluation of a Scientific Productivity Model among World Highly Cited Authors: a Study Based on Experts’ Opinions. (2024). Keshvari, Mariam ; Osare, Farideh.
   In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
   RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01613-1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Top research performance in Poland over three decades: A multidimensional micro-data approach. (2024). Roszka, Wojciech ; Kwiek, Marek.
   In: Journal of Informetrics.
   RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:4:s175115772400107x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The effects of parental’s cultural and economic capital and parental support on being an elite scientists. (2023). Karadag, Engin ; Ciftci, Koza S ; Ergin-Kocaturk, Hatice.
   In: PLOS ONE.
   RePEc:plo:pone00:0287967.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Topic choice, gendered language, and the under-funding of female scholars in mission-oriented research. (2023). Mancuso, Raffaele ; Rossi-Lamastra, Cristina ; Franzoni, Chiara.
   In: Research Policy.
   RePEc:eee:respol:v:52:y:2023:i:6:s0048733323000422.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The three cultures in American science: publication productivity in physics, history and economics. (2022). Rotem, Nir ; Goldstein, Keith ; Yair, Gad ; Olejniczak, Anthony J.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04396-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Gender disparities in Russian academia: a bibliometric analysis. (2022). Pilkina, Marina ; Lovakov, Andrey.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04383-w.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. First-author gender differentials in business journal publishing: top journals versus the rest. (2022). Patil, Vivek H ; Joanis, Steven T.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04235-z.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Streamlining for excellence discriminates against women: A study of research productivity of 2.7 mln scientists in 45 countries. (2022). Walentek, Dawid ; Sankowski, Piotr ; Letki, Natalia ; Biay, Grzegorz.
   In: OSF Preprints.
   RePEc:osf:osfxxx:yr8me_v1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Streamlining for excellence discriminates against women: A study of research productivity of 2.7 mln scientists in 45 countries. (2022). Sankowski, Piotr ; Letki, Natalia ; Biay, Grzegorz ; Walentek, Dawid.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:yr8me.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Is there a differentiated gender effect of collaboration with supercited authors? Evidence from early-career economists. (2021). Terrazas-Santamaría, Diana ; Ramírez-Álvarez, Aurora Alejandra ; Dorantes-Gilardi, Rodrigo ; Terrazas-Santamaria, Diana ; Ramirez-Alvarez, Aurora A.
    In: Serie documentos de trabajo del Centro de Estudios Económicos.
    RePEc:emx:ceedoc:2021-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway. (2021). Abramo, Giovanni ; Aksnes, Dag W ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:2:s1751157721000158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. (2021). MADDI, ABDELGHANI ; Gingras, Yves.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:35:y:2021:i:5:p:1381-1404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Gender disparities in the field of economics. (2020). Song, Yinglu ; Yang, Sai ; Liu, Junwan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03627-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa. (2020). Cowley, Summer ; Kachynska, Nadiia ; Martinez, Magdalena ; Sabzalieva, Emma.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0240903.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy. (2019). Abramo, Giovanni ; Costa, Flavia ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:120:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03136-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Gender diversity in the management field: Does it matter for research outcomes?. (2019). Nielsen, Mathias Wullum ; Borjeson, Love.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:7:p:1617-1632.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. (2018). Mayer, Sabrina J.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2933-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. The hierarchical status of international academic awards in social sciences. (2018). Liu, Nian Cai ; Jiang, Fan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2928-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. The trench warfare of gender discrimination: evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy. (2018). Meschitti, Viviana ; Marini, Giulio.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2696-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers?. (2018). Kwiek, Marek.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2644-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. The law of limited excellence: publication productivity of Israel Prize laureates in the life and exact sciences. (2017). Gueta, Nofar ; Davidovitch, Nitza ; Yair, Gad.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2465-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Gender, web presence and scientific productivity in nanoscience and nanotechnology. (2014). Khoshian, Nahid ; Sotudeh, Hajar.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:99:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1234-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists. (2014). Kumar, S ; Garg, K C.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1107-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Gender differences in science: the case of scientific productivity in Nano Science & Technology during 2005–2007. (2014). Khoshian, Nahid ; Sotudeh, Hajar.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1031-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Gender bias and explanation models for the phenomenon of women’s discriminations in research careers. (2013). Kretschmer, Theo.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:97:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1023-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Research evaluation. Part II: gender effects of evaluation: are men more productive and more cited than women?. (2012). Johannes, Stegmann ; Alexander, Pudovkin ; Hildrun, Kretschmer .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:93:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0658-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 04:19:32 || Missing content? Let us know