1. Stochastic choice and imperfect judgments of line lengths: What is hiding in the noise?. (2025). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean.
   In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
   RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s0167487024000953.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The random thickness of indifference. (2024). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:122165.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Stochastic choice and imperfect judgments of line lengths: What is hiding in the noise?. (2023). Smith, John ; Sean, Duffy.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:116382.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The gradual nature of economic errors. (2022). Garagnani, Michele ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
   In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
   RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:200:y:2022:i:c:p:55-66.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Achtziger, A. ; Alós-Ferrer, C. ; Ritschel, A. Cognitive load in economic decisions. 2020 University of Zurich:

2. Agranov, M. ; Ortoleva, P. Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. 2017 Journal of Political Economy. 125 40-68

3. Aguiar, V.H. ; Boccardi, M.J. ; Dean, M. Satisficing and stochastic choice. 2016 Journal of Economic Theory. 166 445-482

4. Ahumada, A. ; Ulku, L. Luce rule with limited consideration. 2018 Mathematical Social Sciences. 93 52-56

5. Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. 1974 IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 19 716-723
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Allen, R.J. ; Baddeley, A.D. ; Hitch, G.J. Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?. 2006 Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 135 298-313
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Allred, S. ; Crawford, L.E. ; Duffy, S. ; Smith, J. Working memory and spatial judgments: Cognitive load increases the central tendency bias. 2016 Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 23 1825-1831
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Allred, S. ; Duffy, S. ; Smith, J. Cognitive load and strategic sophistication. 2016 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 125 162-178

9. Alós-Ferrer, C. ; Fehr, E. ; Netzer, N. Time will tell: Recovering preferences when choices are noisy. 2021 Journal of Political Economy. -

10. Alós-Ferrer, C. ; Garagnani, M. Choice consistency and strength of preference. 2021 Economics Letters. 198 109672-

11. Alós-Ferrer, C. ; Garagnani, M. Strength of preference and decision making under risk. 2020 University of Zurich:

12. Alós-Ferrer, C. ; Granić, D..G. ; Kern, J. ; Wagner, A.K. Preference reversals: Time and again. 2016 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 52 65-97
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Apesteguia, J. ; Ballester, M.A. Monotone stochastic choice models: The case of risk and time preferences. 2018 Journal of Political Economy. 126 74-106

14. Apesteguia, J. ; Ballester, M.A. ; Lu, J. Single-crossing random utility models. 2017 Econometrica. 85 661-674

15. Argenziano, R. ; Gilboa, I. Psychophysical foundations of the cobb–douglas utility function. 2017 Economics Letters. 157 21-23
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Armel, K.C. ; Beaumel, A. ; Rangel, A. Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. 2008 Judgment and Decision Making. 3 396-403

17. Armel, K.C. ; Rangel, A. The impact of computation time and experience on decision values. 2008 American Economic Review. 98 163-168

18. Ballinger, T.P. ; Wilcox, N.T. Decisions, error and heterogeneity. 1997 Economic Journal. 107 1090-1105

19. Becker, G.M. ; DeGroot, M.H. ; Marschak, J. Stochastic models of choice behavior. 1963 Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 8 41-55
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Benjamin, D.J. ; Brown, S.A. ; Shapiro, J.M. Who is ‘behavioral’? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. 2013 Journal of the European Economic Association. 11 1231-1255

21. Bhat, C.R. A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. 1995 Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 29 471-483

22. Bhui, R. A statistical test for the optimality of deliberative time allocation. 2019 Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 26 855-867
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Bhui, R. Testing optimal timing in value-linked decision making. 2019 Computational Brain and Behavior. 2 85-94
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Birnbaum, M.H. Testing mixture models of transitive preference: Comment on Regenwetter, Dana, and Davis-Stober. 2011 Psychological Review. 118 675-683
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Birnbaum, M.H. ; Schmidt, U. An experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty. 2008 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 37 77-91

26. Birnbaum, M.H. ; Schmidt, U. Testing transitivity in choice under risk. 2010 Theory and Decision. 69 599-614

27. Blavatskyy, P.R. Probabilistic risk aversion with an arbitrary outcome set. 2011 Economics Letters. 112 34-37

28. Blavatskyy, P.R. Stochastic utility theorem. 2008 Journal of Mathematical Economics. 44 1049-1056

29. Bradley, R.A. ; Terry, M.E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. 1952 Biometrika. 39 324-345
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Buckert, M. ; Oechssler, J. ; Schwieren, C. Imitation under stress. 2017 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 139 252-266

31. Butler, D. ; Loomes, G. Decision difficulty and imprecise preferences. 1988 Acta Psychologica. 68 183-196
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Butler, D.J. Do non-expected utility choice patterns spring from hazy preferences? An experimental study of choice ‘errors’. 2000 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 41 277-297

33. Butler, D.J. ; Loomes, G.C. Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon. 2007 American Economic Review. 97 277-297

34. Caplin, A. Choice sets as percepts. 2012 En : Dolan, R. ; Sharot, T. Neuroscience of preference and choice: Cognitive and neural mechanisms. Academic Press: Waltham MA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Caplin, A. Measuring and modeling attention. 2016 Annual Review of Economics. 8 379-403

36. Caplin, A. ; Csaba, D. ; Leahy, J. ; Nov, O. Rational inattention, competitive supply, and psychometrics. 2020 Quarterly Journal of Economics. 135 1681-1724
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Caplin, A. ; Dean, M. Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition. 2015 American Economic Review. 105 2183-2203

38. Caplin, A. ; Dean, M. ; Leahy, J. Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice. 2019 Review of Economic Studies. 86 1061-1094

39. Caplin, A. ; Dean, M. ; Martin, D. Search and satisficing. 2011 American Economic Review. 101 2899-2922

40. Caplin, A. ; Martin, D. A testable theory of imperfect perception. 2015 Economic Journal. 125 184-202

41. Cappelletti, D. ; Güth, W. ; Ploner, M. Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints. 2011 Journal of Economic Psychology. 32 940-950

42. Carpenter, J. ; Graham, M. ; Wolf, J. Cognitive ability and strategic sophistication. 2013 Games and Economic Behavior. 80 115-130

43. Carrasco, M. ; McElree, B. Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing. 2001 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 5363-5367
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Carrasco, M. ; Williams, P.E. ; Yeshurun, Y. Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: Support for signal enhancement. 2002 Journal of Vision. 2 467-479
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Cattaneo, M.D. ; Ma, X. ; Masatlioglu, Y. ; Suleymanov, E. A random attention model. 2020 Journal of Political Economy. 128 2796-2836

46. Cattell, J.M. The time of perception as a measure of differences in intensity. 1902 Philosophische Studien. 19 63-68
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Cerreia-Vioglio, S. ; Dillenberger, D. ; Ortoleva, P. ; Riella, G. Deliberately stochastic. 2019 American Economic Review. 109 2425-2445

48. Charness, G. ; Gneezy, U. ; Halladay, B. Experimental methods: Pay one or pay all. 2016 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 131 141-150

49. Chen, F. ; Fischbacher, U. Response time and click position: Cheap indicators of preferences. 2016 Journal of the Economic Science Association. 2 109-126

50. Cocchi, L. ; Toepel, U. ; De Lucia, M. ; Martuzzi, R. ; Wood, S.J. ; Carter, O. ; Murray, M.M. Working memory load improves early stages of independent visual processing. 2011 Neuropsychologia. 49 92-102
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Conte, A. ; Hey, J.D. Rehabilitating the random utility model. A comment on Apesteguia and Ballester (2018). 2019 Univerity of York:

52. Conte, A. ; Hey, J.D. ; Moffatt, P.G. Mixture models of choice under risk. 2011 Journal of Econometrics. 162 79-88

53. Cox, J.C. ; Sadiraj, V. ; Schmidt, U. Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk. 2015 Experimental Economics. 18 215-250

54. Cubitt, R.P. ; Navarro-Martinez, D. ; Starmer, C. On preference imprecision. 2015 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 50 1-34

55. Dashiell, J.F. Affective value-distances as a determinant of esthetic judgment-times. 1937 American Journal of Psychology. 50 57-67
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Dean, M. ; Neligh, N. Experimental tests of rational inattention. 2019 Columbia University:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Debreu, G. Stochastic choice and cardinal utility. 1958 Econometrica. 26 440-444
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Deck, C. ; Jahedi, S. The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments. 2015 European Economic Review. 78 97-119

59. Deck, C. ; Jahedi, S. ; Sheremeta, R. On the consistency of cognitive load. 2021 European Economic Review. 134 103695-

60. Dewan, A. ; Neligh, N. Estimating information cost functions in models of rational inattention. 2020 Journal of Economic Theory. 187 105011-

61. Drichoutis, A.C. ; Nayga, R. Economic rationality under cognitive load. 2020 Economic Journal. 130 2382-2409

62. Duffy, S. ; Naddeo, J.J. ; Owens, D. ; Smith, J. Cognitive load and mixed strategies: On brains and minimax. 2021 Rutgers University-Camden:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

63. Duffy, S. ; Smith, J. An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?. 2020 Rutgers University-Camden:

64. Duffy, S. ; Smith, J. Cognitive load in the multi-player prisoner’s dilemma game: Are there brains in games?. 2014 Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 51 47-56

65. Dutilh, G. ; Rieskamp, J. Comparing perceptual and preferential decision making. 2016 Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 23 723-737
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

66. Echenique, F. ; Saito, K. ; Tserenjigmid, G. The perception-adjusted Luce model. 2018 Mathematical Social Sciences. 93 67-76

67. Falmagne, J.C. A representation theorem for finite random scale systems. 1978 Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 18 52-72
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der psychophysik. (Elements of psychophysics, translated 1966. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
69. Franco-Watkins, A.M. ; Rickard, T.C. ; Pashler, H. Taxing executive processes does not necessarily increase impulsive decision making. 2010 Experimental Psychology. 57 193-201
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

70. Fudenberg, D. ; Iijima, R. ; Strzalecki, T. Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility. 2015 Econometrica. 83 2371-2409

71. Fudenberg, D. ; Strack, P. ; Strzalecki, T. Speed, accuracy, and the optimal timing of choices. 2018 American Economic Review. 108 3651-3684

72. Gabaix, X. ; Laibson, D. ; Moloche, G. ; Weinberg, S. Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. 2006 American Economic Review. 96 1043-1068

73. Geng, S. Decision time, consideration time, and status quo bias. 2016 Economic Inquiry. 54 433-449

74. Gilbert, D.T. ; Pelham, B.W. ; Krull, D.S. On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. 1988 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54 733-740
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

75. Gul, F. ; Natenzon, P. ; Pesendorfer, W. Random choice as behavioral optimization. 2014 Econometrica. 82 1873-1912

76. Gul, F. ; Pesendorfer, W. Random expected utility. 2006 Econometrica. 74 121-146

77. Hauge, K.E. ; Brekke, K.A. ; Johansson, L.O. ; Johansson-Stenman, O. ; Svedsäter, H. Keeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive load. 2016 Experimental Economics. 19 562-576

78. Henmon, V.A.C. The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy. 1911 Psychological Review. 18 186-201
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

79. Hey, J.D. Experimental investigations of errors in decision making under risk. 1995 European Economic Review. 39 633-640

80. Horan, S. ; Manzini, P. ; Mariotti, M. When is coarseness not a curse? Comparative statics of the coarse random utility model. 2019 University of Sussex:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
81. Kellogg, W.N. The time of judgment in psychometric measures. 1931 American Journal of Psychology. 43 65-86
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

82. Khaw, M.W. ; Li, Z. ; Woodford, M. Cognitive imprecision and small-stakes risk aversion. 2021 Review of Economic Studies. -

83. Koida, N. Anticipated stochastic choice. 2018 Economic Theory. 65 545-574

84. Kovach, M. ; Tserenjigmid, G. The focal Luce model. 2021 American Economic Journal: Microeconomics. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
85. Krajbich, I. ; Armel, C. ; Rangel, A. Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. 2010 Nature Neuroscience. 13 1292-1298
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
86. Krajbich, I. ; Rangel, A. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions. 2011 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 13852-13857
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

87. Lee, L. ; Amir, O. ; Ariely, D. In search of homo economicus: Cognitive noise and the role of emotion in preference consistency. 2009 Journal of Consumer Research. 36 173-187

88. Lévy-Garboua, L. ; Maafi, H. ; Masclet, D. ; Terracol, A. Risk aversion and framing effects. 2012 Experimental Economics. 15 128-144

89. Liu, T. ; Abrams, J. ; Carrasco, M. Voluntary attention enhances contrast appearance. 2009 Psychological Science. 20 354-362
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

90. Lleras, J.S. ; Masatlioglu, Y. ; Nakajima, D. ; Ozbay, E.Y. When more is less: Limited consideration. 2017 Journal of Economic Theory. 170 70-85

91. Loomes, G. ; Pogrebna, G. Measuring individual risk attitudes when preferences are imprecise. 2014 Economic Journal. 124 569-593

92. Loomes, G. ; Starmer, C. ; Sugden, R. Preference reversal: Information-processing effect or rational non-transitive choice?. 1989 Economic Journal. 99 140-151

93. Loomes, G. ; Sugden, R. Incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories. 1995 European Economic Review. 39 641-648

94. Loomis, J. ; Peterson, G. ; Champ, P. ; Brown, T. ; Lucero, B. Paired comparison estimates of willingness to accept versus contingent valuation estimates of willingness to pay. 1998 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 35 501-515

95. Lu, J. Random choice and private information. 2016 Econometrica. 84 1983-2027

96. Luce, R.D. Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. 1959 Wiley: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

97. Luce, R.D. Measurement analogies: Comparisons of behavioral and physical measures. 2005 Psychometrika. 70 227-251

98. Luce, R.D. On the possible psychophysical laws. 1959 Psychological Review. 66 81-95
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
99. Luce, R.D. Thurstone and sensory scaling: Then and now. 1994 Psychological Review. 101 271-277
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

100. Machina, M.J. Stochastic choice functions generated from deterministic preferences over lotteries. 1985 Economic Journal. 95 575-594

101. Manzini, P. ; Mariotti, M. Stochastic choice and consideration sets. 2014 Econometrica. 82 1153-1176

102. Mas-Colell, A. ; Whinston, M.D. ; Green, J.R. Microeconomic Theory. 1995 Oxford University Press: New York

103. Masatlioglu, Y. ; Nakajima, D. ; Ozbay, E.Y. Revealed attention. 2012 American Economic Review. 102 2183-2205

104. Matějka, F. ; McKay, A. Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. 2015 American Economic Review. 105 272-298

105. McFadden, D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. 1974 En : Zarembka, P. Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press: New York
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
106. McFadden, D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. 1981 En : Manski, C. ; McFadden, D. Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

107. McFadden, D. Economic choices. 2001 American Economic Review. 91 351-378

108. McFadden, D. Quantal choice analaysis: A survey. 1976 Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. 5 363-390

109. Milinski, M. ; Wedekind, C. Working memory constrains human cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. 1998 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95 13755-13758
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

110. Moffatt, P.G. Stochastic choice and the allocation of cognitive effort. 2005 Experimental Economics. 8 369-388

111. Morey, C.C. ; Bieler, M. Visual short-term memory always requires general attention. 2013 Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 20 163-170
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
112. Morey, C.C. ; Cowan, N. When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory. 2004 Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 11 296-301
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

113. Mosteller, F. ; Nogee, P. An experimental measurement of utility. 1951 Journal of Political Economy. 59 371-404

114. Münsterberg, H. Studies from the Harvard Psychological Laboratory: (i). 1894 Psychological Review. 1 34-60
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

115. Natenzon, P. Random choice and learning. 2019 Journal of Political Economy. 127 419-457

116. Navarro-Martinez, D. ; Loomes, G. ; Isoni, A. ; Butler, D. ; Alaoui, L. Boundedly rational expected utility theory. 2018 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 57 199-223

117. Olschewski, S. ; Newell, B. ; Scheibehenne, B. How basic cognition influences experience-based economic valuation. 2019 University of Basel:
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
118. Olschewski, S. ; Rieskamp, J. ; Scheibehenne, B. Taxing cognitive capacities reduces choice consistency rather than preference: A model-based test. 2018 Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 147 462-484
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
119. Oud, B. ; Krajbich, I. ; Miller, K. ; Cheong, J.H. ; Botvinick, M. ; Fehr, E. Irrational time allocation in decision-making. 2016 Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 283 20151439-
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
120. Payne, J.W. ; Bettman, J.R. ; Johnson, E.J. The Adaptive decision maker. 1993 Cambridge University Press:
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
121. Payne, J.W. ; Braunstein, M.L. ; Carroll, J.S. Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research. 1978 Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 22 17-44
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
122. Pirrone, A. ; Wen, W. ; Li, S. Single-trial dynamics explain magnitude sensitive decision making. 2018 BMC Neuroscience. 19 54-
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
123. Pleskac, T.J. ; Yu, S. ; Hopwood, C. ; Liu, T. Mechanisms of deliberation during preferential choice: Perspectives from computational modeling and individual differences. 2019 Decision. 6 77-107
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
124. Psychology Software Tools (2012). Inc. [e-prime 2. 0]. Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
125. Regenwetter, M. ; Dana, J. ; Davis-Stober, C.P. Transitivity of preferences. 2011 Psychological Review. 118 42-56
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
126. Regenwetter, M. ; Dana, J. ; Davis-Stober, C.P. ; Guo, Y. Parsimonious testing of transitive or intransitive preferences: Reply to Birnbaum. 2011 Psychological Review. 118 684-688
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
127. Regenwetter, M. ; Davis-Stober, C.P. Behavioral variability of choices versus structural inconsistency of preferences. 2012 Psychological Review. 119 408-416
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

128. Reutskaja, E. ; Nagel, R. ; Camerer, C.F. ; Rangel, A. Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. 2011 American Economic Review. 101 900-926

129. Rieskamp, J. The probabilistic nature of preferential choice. 2008 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 34 1446-1465
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

130. Roch, S.G. ; Lane, J.A.S. ; Samuelson, C.D. ; Allison, S.T. ; Dent, J.L. Cognitive load and the equality heuristic: A two-stage model of resource overconsumption in small groups. 2000 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 83 185-212

131. Rubinstein, A. ; Salant, Y. A model of choice from lists. 2006 Theoretical Economics. 1 3-17

132. Sanjurjo, A. Search with multiple attributes: Theory and empirics. 2017 Games and Economic Behavior. 104 535-562

133. Sanjurjo, A. Search, memory, and choice error: An experiment. 2015 PloS ONE. 10 e0126508-

134. Schulz, J.F. ; Fischbacher, U. ; Thöni, C. ; Utikal, V. Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load. 2014 Journal of Economic Psychology. 41 77-87

135. Schwarz, G.E. Estimating the dimension of a model. 1978 Annals of Statistics. 6 461-464
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

136. Smith, V.L. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. 1976 American Economic Review. 66 274-279

137. Sopher, B. ; Gigliotti, G. Intransitive cycles: Rational choice or random error? An answer based on estimation of error rates with experimental data. 1993 Theory and Decision. 35 311-336
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

138. Sopher, B. ; Narramore, J.M. Stochastic choice and consistency in decision making under risk: An experimental study. 2000 Theory and Decision. 48 323-350

139. Summerfield, C. ; Tsetsos, K. Building bridges between perceptual and economic decision-making: neural and computational mechanisms. 2012 Frontiers in Neuroscience. 6 70-
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
140. Swann, W.B. ; Hixon, G. ; Stein-Seroussi, A. ; Gilbert, D.T. The fleeting gleam of praise: Cognitive processes underlying behavioral reactions to self-relevant feedback. 1990 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59 17-26
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
141. Thurstone, L.L. A law of comparative judgment. 1927 Psychological Review. 34 273-286
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
142. Thurstone, L.L. Psychophysical analysis. 1927 American Journal of Psychology. 38 368-389
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
143. Tsetsos, K. ; Chater, N. ; Usher, M. Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal. 2012 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 9659-9664
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
144. Tsetsos, K. ; Moran, R. ; Moreland, J. ; Chater, N. ; Usher, M. ; Summerfield, C. Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making. 2016 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113 3102-3107
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
145. Tversky, A. Intransitivity of preferences. 1969 Psychological Review. 76 31-48
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

146. Tyson, C.J. Cognitive constraints, contraction consistency, and the satisficing criterion. 2008 Journal of Economic Theory. 138 51-70

147. Volkmann, J. The relation of the time of judgment to the certainty of judgment. 1934 Psychological Bulletin. 31 672-673
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
148. Weber, E. De tactu. 1834 Academic Press: New York
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

149. Weibull, J.W. ; Mattsson, L.G. ; Voorneveld, M. Better may be worse: Some monotonicity results and paradoxes in discrete choice under uncertainty. 2007 Theory and Decision. 63 121-151

150. Wilcox, N.T. Stochastically more risk averse:’ A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk. 2011 Journal of Econometrics. 162 89-104

151. Woodford, M. Stochastic choice: An optimizing neuroeconomic model. 2014 American Economic Review. 104 495-500

152. Yellott, J.I. The relationship between Luce’s choice axiom, thurstone’s theory of comparative judgment, and the double exponential distribution. 1977 Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 15 109-144
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

153. Yeshurun, Y. ; Carrasco, M. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. 1998 Nature. 396 72-75

154. Zeigenfuse, M.D. ; Pleskac, T.J. ; Liu, T. Rapid decisions from experience. 2014 Cognition. 131 181-194
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
155. Zokaei, N. ; Heider, M. ; Husain, M. Attention is required for maintenance of feature binding in visual working memory. 2014 Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 67 1191-1213
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

1. Turning worries into cognitive performance: Results from an online experiment during Covid. (2023). Raiber, Eva ; Demont, Timothée ; Saenz, Daniela Horta.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03953178.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Delaying and motivating decisions in the (Bully) dictator game. (2023). Boncinelli, Leonardo ; Bilancini, Ennio ; Guarnieri, Pietro ; Spadoni, Lorenzo.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323001325.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Turning worries into performance: Results from an online experiment during COVID. (2023). Raiber, Eva ; Demont, Timothée ; Saenz, Daniela Horta.
   In: French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2023.
   RePEc:boc:fsug23:08.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Turning worries into cognitive performance: Results from an online experiment during Covid. (2023). Raiber, Eva ; Demont, Timothée ; Saenz, Daniela Horta.
   In: AMSE Working Papers.
   RePEc:aim:wpaimx:2302.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Multiple Switching and Data Quality in the Multiple Price List. (2021). Zhang, Y. Jane ; Zuo, Sharon Xuejing ; Yu, Chi Wai.
   In: The Review of Economics and Statistics.
   RePEc:tpr:restat:v:103:y:2021:i:1:p:136-150.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Delaying and Motivating Decisions in the (Bully) Dictator Game. (2021). Boncinelli, Leonardo ; Bilancini, Ennio ; Guarnieri, Pietro ; Spadoni, Lorenzo.
   In: Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:pie:dsedps:2021/277.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?. (2021). Smith, John ; Gussman, Steven ; Duffy, Sean.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:93:y:2021:i:c:s2214804321000483.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Multiple behavioral rules in Cournot oligopolies. (2021). Ritschel, Alexander ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
   In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
   RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:183:y:2021:i:c:p:250-267.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Imposing choice on the uninformed: the case of dynamic currency conversion. (2020). Ewerhart, Christian ; Li, Sheng.
   In: ECON - Working Papers.
   RePEc:zur:econwp:345.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Multiple behavioral rules in Cournot oligopolies. (2020). Ritschel, Alexander ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:331.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Strength of preference and decisions under risk. (2020). Garagnani, Michele ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy. (2020). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Randomization and Ambiguity Aversion. (2020). Ke, Shaowei ; Zhang, QI.
    In: Econometrica.
    RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:88:y:2020:i:3:p:1159-1195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience. (2020). Gottlieb, Daniel ; Ortoleva, Pietro ; Dejarnette, Patrick ; Dillenberger, David.
    In: Econometrica.
    RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:619-656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?. (2020). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:99417.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Reconsidering Risk Aversion. (2020). Kimball, Miles ; Benjamin, Daniel ; Fontana, Mark Alan.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems. (2020). Foucart, Renaud ; Bouacida, Elias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lan:wpaper:301646245.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Why do people prefer randomisation? An experimental investigation. (2020). Permana, Yudistira.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:88:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-019-09719-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Dual choice axiom and probabilistic choice. (2020). Blavatskyy, Pavlo R.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:61:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-020-09332-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. A Behavioral Characterization of the Drift Diffusion Model and Its Multialternative Extension for Choice Under Time Pressure. (2020). Marinacci, Massimo ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Pirazzini, Marco ; Maccheroni, Fabio ; Baldassi, Carlo.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:11:p:5075-5093.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers). (2020). Sobbrio, Francesco ; Germano, Fabrizio.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:187:y:2020:i:c:s0047272720300529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Preferences for power. (2020). Pikulina, Elena S ; Tergiman, Chloe.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:185:y:2020:i:c:s0047272720300372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Randomization under ambiguity: Efficiency and incentive compatibility. (2020). Liu, Zhiwei ; Song, Xinxi ; Yannelis, Nicholas C.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:90:y:2020:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games. (2020). Shogren, Jason ; Malézieux, Antoine ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Luchini, S ; Malezieux, A.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:124:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120300015.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Cognitive abilities and risk taking: the role of preferences. (2020). Lohse, Johannes ; Drouvelis, Michalis.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bir:birmec:20-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Black-Box Strategies and Equilibrium for Games with Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Players. (2020). Anantharam, Venkat ; Phade, Soham R.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2004.09592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Revealed statistical consumer theory. (2019). Dziewulski, Pawel ; Allen, Roy ; Rehbeck, John.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sus:susewp:1119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?. (2019). Smith, John ; Gussman, Steven ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:93126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Paying for Kidneys? A Randomized Survey and Choice Experiment. (2019). Macis, Mario ; Lacetera, Nicola ; Elias, Julio.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25581.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Why choice lists increase risk taking. (2019). Mayraz, Guy ; Freeman, David.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-018-9586-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. “Dice”-sion–Making Under Uncertainty: When Can a Random Decision Reduce Risk?. (2019). Wiesemann, Wolfram ; Delage, Erick ; Kuhn, Daniel.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:7:p:3282-3301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice. (2019). Webb, Ryan.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:1:p:230-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Eliciting Choice Correspondences A General Method and an Experimental Implementation. (2019). Bouacida, Elias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01998001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Eliciting Choice Correspondences A General Method and an Experimental Implementation. (2019). Bouacida, Elias.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-01998001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Revealed preferences under uncertainty: Incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization. (2019). Riedl, Arno ; Cettolin, Elena.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:547-585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Choice-theoretic foundations of the divisive normalization model. (2019). Glimcher, Paul ; Steverson, Kai ; Brandenburger, Adam.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:164:y:2019:i:c:p:148-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Paying for Kidneys? A Randomized Survey and Choice Experiment. (2019). Macis, Mario ; Lacetera, Nicola ; Elias, Julio.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:201910.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Flipping a coin: Evidence from university applications. (2018). Weizsäcker, Georg ; Kübler, Dorothea ; Dwenger, Nadja ; Weizsacker, Georg ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:209666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Smokers’ Rational Lexicographic Preferences for Cigarette Package Warnings: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Eye Tracking. (2018). Triunfo, Patricia ; Gerstenbluth, Mariana ; Harris, Jeffrey E.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ude:wpaper:0218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. The Economic Relevancy of Risk Preferences Elicited Online and With Low Stakes. (2018). Johnson, David ; Gibson, John.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:87231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience. (2018). Ortoleva, Pietro ; Gottlieb, Daniel ; Dejarnette, Patrick ; Dillenberger, David.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:18-021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Flipping a coin: Evidence from university applications. (2018). Weizsäcker, Georg ; Kübler, Dorothea ; Dwenger, Nadja ; Weizsacker, Georg ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:167:y:2018:i:c:p:240-250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Fechner’s strong utility model for choice among n>2 alternatives: Risky lotteries, Savage acts, and intertemporal payoffs. (2018). Blavatskyy, Pavlo.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:75-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models. (2018). Clithero, John A.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:61-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Random intertemporal choice. (2018). Lu, Jay ; Saito, Kota.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:177:y:2018:i:c:p:780-815.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences when Choices Are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Nick, Netzer ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Time will tell - Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1811.02497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Opinion Dynamics via Search Engines (and other Algorithmic Gatekeepers). (2018). Sobbrio, Francesco ; Germano, Fabrizio.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1810.06973.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. No Time to Think: Food Decision-Making under Time Pressure. (2018). Palma, Marco ; Huseynov, Samir ; Krajbich, Ian.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:274135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

51. On the Roots of the Intrinsic Value of Decision Rights: Evidence from France and Japan. (2017). Tarroux, Benoît ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki ; Ferreira, João.
    In: Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen).
    RePEc:tut:cremwp:2017-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

52. Aligning Democracy: A Comment on Bruno S. Frey’s “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future”. (2017). Kendall, Ryan.
    In: Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics.
    RePEc:spr:homoec:v:34:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s41412-017-0053-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

53. Indifference or indecisiveness: a strict discrimination. (2017). Ong, Qiyan ; Qiu, Jianying.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:81790.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

54. Indifference or indecisiveness: a strict discrimination. (2017). Ong, Qiyan ; Qiu, Jianying.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:81440.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

55. Deliberately Stochastic. (2017). Riella, Gil ; Ortoleva, Pietro ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Dillenberger, David.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:17-013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

56. On the Roots of the Intrinsic Value of Decision Rights: Evidence from France and Japan. (2017). Tarroux, Benoît ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki ; Ferreira, João.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2017-29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

57. Goal-based models for discrete choice analysis. (2017). Swait, Joffre.
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:72-88.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

58. Breaking Bad: When Being Disadvantaged Incentivizes (Seemingly) Risky Behavior. (). Gibson, John.
    In: Eastern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:pal:easeco:v::y::i::d:10.1057_s41302-020-00172-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

59. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Report date: 2025-09-22 23:37:27 || Missing content? Let us know