1. The Role of Italian Local Agencies for Water Management in the Mitigation of and Adaptation to Climate Change: Stated Preference Methods for Future Sustainable Strategies. (2025). Zucaro, Raffaella ; Henke, Roberto ; Rossi, Eleonora Sofia ; Cacchiarelli, Luca ; Galeotti, Sofia.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3360-:d:1631432.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Environmental Concerns of Agri-Food Product Consumers: Key Factors. (2024). Valdelomar-Muoz, Sergio ; Murgado-Armenteros, Eva Maria.
   In: Agriculture.
   RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1197-:d:1439461.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Abeliotis, K.; Koniari, C.; Sardianou, E. The profile of the green consumer in Greece. Int. J. Cons. Stud. 2010, 34, 153–160. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Alcon, F.; Marín-Miñano, C.; Zabala, J.A.; de-Miguel, M.D.; Martínez-Paz, J.M. Valuing diversification benefits through intercropping in Mediterranean agroecosystems: A choice experiment approach. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 171, 106593. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Alemu, G.T.; Tsunekawa, A.; Haregeweyn, N.; Nigussle, Z.; Tsubo, M.; Elias, A.; Ayalew, Z.; Berihun, D.; Adgo, E.; Meshesha, D.T.; et al. Smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for sustainable land management practices in the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 5640–5665. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Altieri, M.A.; Nicholls, C.I. Agroecology and the Search for a Truly Sustainable Agriculture; Basic Textbooks for Environmental Training; United Nations Environment Programme Environmental Training Network for Latin America and the Caribbean: Mexico City, Mexico, 2005.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Aprile, M.C.; Punzo, G. How environmental sustainability labels affect food choices: Assessing consumer preferences in southern Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 332, 130046. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Arnoldussen, F.; Koetse, M.J.; de Bruyn, S.M.; Kuik, O. What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14299. [CrossRef]

7. Bani, L.; Massimino, D.; Orioli, V.; Bottoni, L.; Massa, R. Assessment of population trends of common breeding birds in Lombardia, Northern Italy, 1992–2007. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2009, 21, 27–44. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Bateman, I.J.; Carson, R.T.; Day, B.; Hanemann, M.; Hanley, N.; Hett, T.; Jones-Lee, M.; Loomes, G.; Mourato, S.; Özdemiroglu, E.; et al. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2002.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Blasi, E.; Ruini, L.; Monotti, C. Technologies and new business models to increase sustainability in agro-food value chain: Promote quality and reduce environmental footprint in durum wheat cultivation processes. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Tech 2017, 28, 52–55.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Borrello, M.; Cecchini, L.; Vecchio, R.; Caracciolo, F.; Cembalo, L.; Torquati, B. Agricultural landscape certification as a marketdriven tool to reward the provisioning of cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2022, 193, 107286. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Boxall, P.C.; Adamowicz, W.L.; Swait, J.; Williams, M.; Louviere, J. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecol. Econ. 1996, 18, 243–253. [CrossRef]

12. Bravi, M.; D’Urso, A.; Gallo, R.; Piazza, L. Sustainable innovation management in the food industry. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2021, 87, 379–384. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Cacchiarelli, L.; Lass, D.; Sorrentino, A. CAP Reform and Price Transmission in the Italian Pasta Chain. Agribus 2016, 32, 482–497. [CrossRef]

14. Cacchiarelli, L.; Sorrentino, A. Market power in food supply chain: Evidence from Italian pasta chain. Br. Food J. 2018, 120, 2129–2141. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Carillo, F.; Caracciolo, F.; Cembalo, L. Do durum wheat producers benefit of vertical coordination? Agric. Food Econ. 2017, 5, 19. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Carson, R.T. Contingent valuation: A user’s guide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1413–1418. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Cecchini, L.; Torquati, B.; Chiorri, M. Sustainable agri-food products: A review of consumer preference studies through experimental economics. Agric. Econ. 2018, 64, 554–565. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Chkanikova, O.; Lehner, M. Private eco-brands and green market development: Towards new forms of sustainability governance in the food retailing. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 74–84. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Choi, A.S.; Fielding, K.S. Environmental attitudes as WTP predictors: A case study involving endangered species. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 89, 24–32. [CrossRef]

20. Ciliberti, S.; Stanco, M.; Frascarelli, A.; Marotta, G.; Martino, G.; Nazzaro, C. Sustainability Strategies and Contractual Arrangements in the Italian Pasta Supply Chain: An Analysis under the Neo Institutional Economics Lens. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8542. [CrossRef]

21. Cohen, M.C.; Jacquillat, A.; Song, H. Price discrimination and inventory allocation Bertrand competition. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2022, 25, 148–167. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Cooper, P.; Poe, G.L.; Bateman, I.J. The structure of motivation for contingent values: A case study of lake water quality improvement. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 50, 69–82. [CrossRef]

23. Cruz, S.M.; Manata, B. Measurement of environmental concern: A review and analysis. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 363. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Cummings, R.G.; Taylor, L.O. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. Am. Econ. Rev. 1999, 89, 649–665. [CrossRef]

25. Danner, H.; Hagerer, G.; Pan, Y.; Groh, G. The news media and its audience: Agenda setting on organic food in the United States and Germany. J.Clean.Prod. 2022, 354, 131503. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. De Bauw, M.; Franssens, S.; Vranken, L. Trading off environmental attributes in food consumption choices. Food Policy 2022, 112, 102338. [CrossRef] Agriculture 2023, 13, 585 18 of 18

27. De Valck, J.; Rolfe, J.; Rajapaksa, D.; Star, M. Consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for improved environmental standards: Insights from cane sugar in the Great Barrier Reef region. Aust. J. Agric. Econ. 2022, 66, 505–531. [CrossRef]

28. Defrancesco, E.; Perito, M.A.; Bozzolan, I.; Cei, L.; Stefani, G. Testing Consumers’ Preferences for Environmental Attributes of Pasta. Insights from an ABR Approach. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1701. [CrossRef]

29. Di Vita, G.; Caracciolo, F.; Brun, F.; D’Amico, M. Picking out a wine: Consumer motivation behind different quality wines choice. Wine Econ. Policy 2019, 8, 16–27. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Diverfarming Consortium. Farm Level Economic Benefits, Costs and Improved Sustainability of Diversified Cropping Systems. Deliverable D8.3. Diverfarming Project and Consortium. 2020. Available online: https://www.diverfarming.eu (accessed on 31 January 2023).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Diverfarming Consortium. Report on Value Chain Level Economic Gains, Reduced Risks and Improved Sustainability. Deliverable D8.4. Diverfarming Project and Consortium. 2022. Available online: https://www.diverfarming.eu (accessed on 31 January 2023).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. European Commission. Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Document Proposals for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing Rules on Support for Strategic Plans to be Drawn up by Member States under the Common Agricultural Policy. 2018. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX: 52018SC0301&rid=2. (accessed on 1 March 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. European Commission. The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 Final. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/ default/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf. (accessed on 1 March 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Fava, L.; Orrù, M.A.; Scardala, S.; Alonzo, E.; Fardella, M.; Strumia, C.; Martinelli, A.; Finocchiaro, S.; Previtera, M.; Franchi, A.; et al. Pesticides and their metabolites in selected Italian groundwater and surface water used for drinking. Ann. Dell’istituto Super. Sanità 2010, 46, 309–316. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Forleo, M.B.; Romagnoli, L.; Palmieri, N. Are Italian consumers of canned tuna fish sensitive to environmentally sustainable product attributes? Br. Food J. 2023, 125, 608–625. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Fouilleux, E. Sustainable Voluntary Standards: Towards Privatized Regulation in the Food and Farm Sector? In Development, the Environment, and Food: Towards Agricultural Change? Jacquet, P., Pachauri, R., Tubiana, L., Eds.; A Planet for Life Series; TERI Press: New Dehli, India, 2012; pp. 215–225.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Frascarelli, A.; Ciliberti, S.; de Oliveira, G.M.; Chiodini, G.; Martino, G. Production contracts and food quality: A transaction cost analysis for the Italian durum wheat sector. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2921. [CrossRef]

38. Glenk, K.; Colombo, S. How Sure Can You Be? A Framework for Considering Delivery Uncertainty in Benefit Assessments Based on Stated Preference Methods. J. Agric. Econ. 2011, 62, 25–46. [CrossRef]

39. Govindan, K. Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 195, 419–431. [CrossRef]

40. Grunert, K.G.; Hieke, S.; Wills, J. Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy 2014, 44, 177–189. [CrossRef]

41. Haghani, M.; Bliemer, M.C.; Rose, J.M.; Oppewal, H.; Lancsar, E. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods. J. Choice Model. 2021, 41, 100322. [CrossRef]

42. ISMEA; Rete Rurale Nazionale(RRN). La Competitività Della Filiera del Frumento Duro. Dicembre 2018. Available online: https://www.ismea.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/10675 (accessed on 2 August 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. ISMEA. La Catena Del Valore Della Pasta e Del Pane. Piano di Settore Cerealicolo, Ottobre 2019. Available online: https://www. ismeamercati.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/3113 (accessed on 2 August 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. ISTAT. Indagine Sulle Spese Delle Famiglie: Microdati ad Uso Pubblico. 2018. Available online: https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/ 180356 (accessed on 1 March 2019).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Jørgensen, S.; Pedersen, L.J.T.; Skard, S. How going green builds trusting beliefs. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 297–311. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Kemp, K.; Insch, A.; Holdsworth, D.K.; Knight, J.G. Food miles: Do UK consumers actually care? Food Policy 2010, 35, 504–513. [CrossRef]

47. Khan, R.J.; Jain, D.C. An Empirical Analysis of Price Discrimination Mechanisms and Retailer Profitability. J. Mark. 2005, 42, 516–524. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Latvala, T.; Regina, K.; Lehtonen, H. Evaluating Non-Market Values of Agroecological and Socio-Cultural Benefits of Diversified Cropping Systems. Environ. Manag. 2021, 67, 988–999. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Lemken, D.; Knigge, M.; Meyerding, S.; Spiller, A. The Value of Environmental and Health Claims on New Legume Products: A Non-Hypothetical Online Auction. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1340. [CrossRef]

50. Louviere, J.J.; Hensher, D. Design and Analysis of Simulated Choice or Allocation Experiments in Travel Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Record: Washington, DC, USA, 1982; pp. 11–17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Ma, X.; Liu, Z.; Meng, T.; Florkowski, W.J.; Mu, Y. Impact of Food Sustainability Labels on the Price of Rice in Online Sales. Food 2022, 11, 3781. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Maloney, M.P.; Ward, M.P.; Braucht, G.N. A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. Am. Psychol. 1975, 30, 787–790. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

53. Martin-Gorriz, B.; Zabala, J.A.; Sánchez-Navarro, V.; Gallego-Elvira, B.; Martínez-García, V.; Alcon, F.; Maestre-Valero, J.F. Intercropping Practices in Mediterranean Mandarin Orchards from an Environmental and Economic Perspective. Agriculture 2022, 12, 574. [CrossRef]

54. McDonald, J.F.; Moffitt, R.A. The uses of Tobit analysis. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1980, 62, 318–321. [CrossRef]

55. Messéan, A.; Viguier, L.; Paresys, L.; Aubertot, J.; Canali, S.; Iannetta, P.; Justes, E.; Karley, A.; Keillor, B.; Kemper, L.; et al. Enabling crop diversification to support transitions toward more sustainable European agrifood systems. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2021, 8, 474–480. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Mitchell, R.C.; Carson, R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, 1st ed.; Resources for the Future; RFF Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

57. Murphy, J.J.; Allen, P.G.; Stevens, T.H.; Weatherhead, D. A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2005, 30, 313–325. [CrossRef]

58. Nash, H.A. The European Commission’s sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 496–498. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
59. Netuveli, G.; Watts, P. Pro-environmental behaviours and attitudes are associated with health, wellbeing and life satisfaction in multiple occupancy households in the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Popul. Environ. 2020, 41, 347–371. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Osawe, O.W.; Grilli, G.; Curtis, J. Examining food preferences in the face of environmental pressures. J. Agric. Res. 2023, 11, 100476. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Palmieri, N.; Stefanoni, W.; Latterini, F.; Pari, L. An Italian explorative study of willingness to pay for a new functional pasta featuring opuntia ficus indica. Agriculture 2021, 11, 701. [CrossRef]

62. Pancino, B.; Blasi, E.; Rappoldt, A.; Pascucci, S.; Ruini, L.; Ronchi, C. Partnering for sustainability in agri-food supply chains: The case of Barilla Sustainable Farming in the Po Valley. Agric. Food Econ. 2019, 7, 13. [CrossRef]

63. Panico, T.; Del Giudice, T.; Caracciolo, F. Quality dimensions and consumer preferences: A choice experiment in the Italian extra-virgin olive oil market. Agric. Econ. Rev. 2014, 15, 100–112. [CrossRef]

64. Perego, A.; Basile, A.; Bonfante, A.; De Mascellis, R.; Terribile, F.; Brenna, S.; Acutis, M. Nitrate leaching under maize cropping systems in Po Valley (Italy). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 147, 57–65. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
65. Perni, A.; Barreiro-Hurlé, J.; Martínez-Paz, J.M. When policy implementation failures affect public preferences for environmental goods: Implications for economic analysis in the European water policy. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 169, 106523. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
66. Pretty, J.; Bharucha, Z.P. Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1571–1596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Agriculture 2023, 13, 585 17 of 18
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. Prothero, A.; McDonagh, P.; Dobscha, S. Is Green the New Black? Reflections on a Green Commodity Discourse. J. Macromark. 2010, 30, 147–159. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Raimondo, M.; Caracciolo, F.; Cembalo, L.; Chinnici, G.; Pappalardo, G.; D’Amico, M. Moving towards circular bioeconomy: Managing olive cake supply chain through contracts. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 28, 180–191. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

69. Recchia, L.; Cappelli, A.; Cini, E.; Garbati Pegna, F.; Boncinelli, P. Environmental Sustainability of Pasta Production Chains: An Integrated Approach for Comparing Local and Global Chains. Resources 2019, 8, 56. [CrossRef]

70. Richartz, C.; Abdulai, A. The role of information in consumer preferences for sustainable certified palm oil products in Germany. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271198. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

71. Rosa-Schleich, J.; Loos, J.; Mußhoff, O.; Tscharntke, T. Ecological-economic trade-offs of Diversified Farming Systems—A review. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 160, 251–263. [CrossRef]

72. Rossi, C.; Rivetti, F. Young consumers’ purchase behaviour of sustainably-labelled food products. What is the role of scepticism? Food Qual. Prefer. 2023, 105, 104772. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
73. Schäufele, I.; Hamm, U. Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 147, 379–394. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
74. Sellers-Rubio, R.; Nicolau-Gonzalbez, J.L. Estimating the willingness to pay for a sustainable wine using a Heckit model. J. Wine Econ. 2016, 5, 96–104. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

75. Seo, S.; Ahn, H.-K.; Jeong, J.; Moon, J. Consumers’ attitude toward sustainable food products: Ingredients vs. packaging. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1073. [CrossRef]

76. Sogari, G.; Li, J.; Lefebvre, M.; Menozzi, D.; Pellegrini, N.; Cirelli, M.; Gómez, M.I.; Mora, C. The Influence of Health Messages in Nudging Consumption of Whole Grain Pasta. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2993. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

77. Staples, A.J.; Reeling, C.J.; Widmar, N.J.O.; Lusk, J.L. Consumer willingness to pay for sustainability attributes in beer: A choice experiment using eco-labels. Agribusiness 2020, 36, 591–612. [CrossRef]

78. Tait, P.; Saunders, C.; Guenther, M.; Rutherford, P.; Miller, S. Exploring the impacts of food label format on consumer willingness to pay for environmental sustainability: A choice experiment approach in the United Kingdom and Japan. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 1787–1796.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
79. Tellarini, V.; Caporali, F. An input/output methodology to evaluate farms as sustainable agroecosystems: An application of indicators to farms in central Italy. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000, 77, 111–123. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
80. Tobin, J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent-variables. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 1958, 26, 24–36. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

81. Van Loo, E.J.; Caputo, V.; Nayga Jr, R.M.; Seo, H.S.; Zhang, B.; Verbeke, W. Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 118, 215–225. [CrossRef]

82. Vanhonacker, F.; Van Loo, E.J.; Gellynck, X.; Verbeke, W. Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices. Appetite 2013, 62, 7–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
83. Vermeir, I.; Verbeke, W. Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude-behavioral intention” gap. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2006, 19, 169–194. [CrossRef] Agriculture 2023, 13, 585 16 of 18
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
84. Vermunt, J.; Magidson, J. Latent Class Cluster Analysis. In Applied Latent Class Analysis; Hagenaars, J., McCutcheon, A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2022; pp. 89–106. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
85. Wang, Y.; Chung, T.; Lai, P. Go Sustainability—Willingness to Pay for Eco–Agricultural Innovation: Understanding Chinese Traditional Cultural Values and Label Trust Using a VAB Hierarchy Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 751. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
86. Weituschat, C.S.; Pascucci, S.; Materia VCTamas, P.; de Jong, R.; Trienekens, J. Goal frames and sustainability transitions: How cognitive lock-ins can impede crop diversification. Sustain. Sci. 2022, 17, 2203–2219. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
87. Zabala, J.A.; Albaladejo-García, J.A.; Navarro, N.; Martínez-Paz, J.M.; Alcon, F. Integration of preference heterogeneity into sustainable nature conservation: From practice to policy. J. Nat. Conserv. 2022, 65, 126095. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Best Business Models for the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Sector: Patterns for Innovation. (2024). Schroedel, Sebastian.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3787-:d:1386879.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Evaluating the Creative Economy Applying the Contingent Valuation Method: A Case Study on the Greek Cultural Heritage Festival. (2023). Boufounou, Paraskevi ; Mergos, George ; Koumoutsea, Aikaterini.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16441-:d:1291369.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. The Value of Crop Diversification: Understanding the Factors Influencing Consumers’ WTP for Pasta from Sustainable Agriculture. (2023). Zabala, Jose A. ; Caracciolo, Francesco ; Blasi, Emanuele ; Rossi, Eleonora Sofia.
   In: Agriculture.
   RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:585-:d:1082652.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Generational effect and territorial distributive justice, the two main drivers for willingness to pay for renewable energies. (2022). Bourdin, Sébastien ; Bonnet, Jean ; Faulques, Martin ; Juge, Marine ; Pigeon, Jonas ; Richard, Charlotte.
   In: Energy Policy.
   RePEc:eee:enepol:v:168:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522003196.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Using Choice Experiments to Investigate the Policy Relevance of Heterogeneity in Farmer Agri-Environmental Contract Preferences. (2012). Vedel, Suzanne ; Broch, Stine .
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:51:y:2012:i:4:p:561-581.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The price of policy risk — Empirical insights from choice experiments with European photovoltaic project developers. (2012). Lthi, Sonja ; Wstenhagen, Rolf.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:1001-1011.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Do Respondents’ Perceptions of the Status Quo Matter in Non-Market Valuation with Choice Experiments? An Application to New Zealand Freshwater Streams. (2011). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Mkwara, Lena ; Marsh, Dan.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:3:y:2011:i:9:p:1593-1615:d:14112.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. How can Behavioral Economics Inform Non-Market Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2010). List, John ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ala:wpaper:2010-08.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Solid Waste Disposal: A Choice Experiment Experience in Malaysia. (2009). Pek, Chuen-Khee ; Othman, Jamal.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:23126.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Defining environmental attributes as external costs in choice experiments: A discussion. (2009). Riera Font, Antoni ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M..
    In: CRE Working Papers (Documents de treball del CRE).
    RePEc:pdm:wpaper:2009/1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Preferences for domestic water services in the Middle Olifants sub-basin of South Africa. (2009). Tsegai, Daniel ; Kloos, Julia.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:ubzefd:49970.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Incentive Compatibility in an Attribute-Based Referendum Model. (2008). Lupi, Frank ; Racevskis, Laila .
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6477.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Health and Environmental Benefits of Reduced Pesticide Use in Uganda: An Experimental Economics Analysis. (2008). Taylor, Daniel ; Bonabana-Wabbi, Jackline.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6441.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Modeling Yeah- and Nay-Saying to Alternatives in Conjoint Experiments. (2008). Hu, Wuyang.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Optimizing Farmland Preservation Choices Across Communities and Jurisdictional Scales: To What Extent are Amenity Values and Selection Criteria Transferable?. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica G..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Systematic Variation in Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Land Preservation and Implications for Benefit Transfer: A Meta-Analysis. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica B..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. The trade off between time and money: Is there a difference between real and hypothetical choices?. (2007). Isacsson, Gunnar.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:vtiwps:2007_003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Reliability Of Stated Preferences For Cholera And Typhoid Vaccines With Time To Think In Hue, Vietnam. (2007). Cook, Joseph.
    In: EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper.
    RePEc:eep:tpaper:sp200701s1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Valuing the Economic Benefits of Preserving Cultural Heritage: The My Son Sanctuary World Heritage Site in Vietnam. (2007). TRAN, TUAN.
    In: EEPSEA Research Report.
    RePEc:eep:report:rr2007072.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Consumer Attitudes, Willingness to Pay and Revealed Preferences for Different Egg Production Attributes: Analysis of Canadian Egg Consumers. (2007). Goddard, Ellen ; Boxall, Peter ; Emunu, John Paul ; Boyd, Curtis ; Asselin, Andre ; Neall, Amanda .
    In: Project Report Series.
    RePEc:ags:ualbpr:52087.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Investigating distance effects on environmental values: a choice modelling approach. (2007). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:118326.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Valuing Environmental Factors in Cost-Benefit Analysis Using Data Envelopment Analysis. (2006). Kuosmanen, Timo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Analysis of Vocational and Residential Preferences of Rural Population: Application of an Experimental Technique to Rural Slovenia. (2006). Zanni, Alberto ; Davidova, Sophia ; Bailey, Alastair.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae06:25534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Multifunctional Policy Measures: Farmers Choice. (2006). Arovuori, Kyosti ; Kola, Jukka.
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21400.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. SPLIT-SAMPLE TESTS OF DONT KNOW AND INDIFFERENT RESPONSES IN AN ATTRIBUTE BASED CHOICE MODEL. (2006). Lupi, Frank ; Hoehn, John ; Kaplowitz, Michael D. ; Fenichel, Eli P..
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21070.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Experimental Designs for Environmental Valuation with Choice-Experiments: A Monte-Carlo Investigation. (2005). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Ferrini, Silvia.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:05/08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Are Agricultural Measures for Groundwater Protection Beneficial When Compared to Purification of Polluted Groundwater?. (2005). Lundhede, Thomas ; Hasler, Berit.
    In: 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    RePEc:ags:eaae05:24587.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The Structure of Rural Landscape in Monetary Evaluation Studies: Main Analytical Approaches in Literature. (2005). Pulina, Pietro ; Madau, Fabio ; Idda, Lorenzo ; Benedetto, Graziella ; Orru, Elia.
    In: 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    RePEc:ags:eaae05:24549.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Factors Influencing Lease Revenue and Non-industrial Landowners Willingness to allow Hunting Access. (2005). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Grado, Stephen C. ; Munn, Ian A. ; Loden, Emily K. ; Jones, Daryl W..
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19326.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. The Valuation of the IJmeer Nature Reserve using Conjoint Analysis. (2004). Baarsma, Barbara.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0404006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. A comparison of stated preference methods for estimating monetary values. (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:3:p:291-296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, Håkan ; Olsson, Bjorn .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Why Value Estimates Generated Using Choice Modelling Exceed Contingent Valuation: Further Experimental Evidence. (2004). Taylor, Laura ; Boyle, Kevin ; Morrison, Mark.
    In: 2004 Conference (48th), February 11-13, 2004, Melbourne, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare04:58370.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
    In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
    RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Using stated preference methods to evaluate the impact of water on health: the case of metropolitan Cairo. (2003). Abou-Ali, Hala.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Economics of Wildlife Tourism. (2003). Wilson, Clevo ; Tisdell, Clem.
    In: Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:uqseee:48969.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Valuation of Tourisms Natural Resources. (2003). Tisdell, Clem.
    In: Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:uqseee:48962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling. (2002). Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:23:y:2002:i:2:p:167-186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Modelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland. (2002). Wright, Robert ; Koop, Gary ; Hanley, Nick.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:449-466.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Social Benefits of Multifunctional Agriculture in Finland. (2002). Yrjola, Tapani ; Kola, Jukka.
    In: 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain.
    RePEc:ags:eaae02:24812.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

51. Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management. (2000). Stevens, T. H. ; Belkner, R. ; Kittredge, D. ; Dennis, D. ; Willis, C..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:32:y:2000:i:1:p:63-74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

52. Valuing the Recreational Benefits From the Creation of Nature Reserves in Irish Forests. (1999). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Chilton, Susan M. ; Buongiorno, Joseph ; Hutchinson, George W..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:1999.11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

53. Bargaining to preserve a unique ecosystem: the role of anticipatory investments to establish stronger bargaining positions. (1999). Stranlund, John.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:31:y:1999:i:3:p:425-437.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

54. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Report date: 2025-09-22 21:16:36 || Missing content? Let us know