1. Moving beyond the contingent valuation versus choice experiment debate – Presentation effects in stated preference. (2018). Zawojska, Ewa ; Lloyd-Smith, Patrick ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:war:wpaper:2018-14.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao. (2006). Wang, Zhishi ; Ran, Shenghong ; Jin, Jianjun.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:57:y:2006:i:3:p:430-441.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere and M. Williams (1994), Combining stated and revealed preference methods for valuing environmental amenities, Journal of environmental Economics and Management, 26: 271-296.

2. Bateman, I., R. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, S. Mourato, E. Özdemiroglu, D. Pearce, R. Sugden and J. Swanson (2002), Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual, E. Eglar, Cheltenham, UK, 458 pp.

3. Ben-Akiva, M. and S. Lerman (1985), Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 390 pp.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Blamey, R., J. Bennett and M. Morrison (1999), Yea-saying in contingent valuation surveys, Land Economics, 75 (1): 126-141.

5. Boxall, P., W. Adamowicz, J. Swait, M. Williams and J. Louviere (1996), A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation, Ecological Economics, 18: 243-253.

6. Carlsson, F. and P. Martinsson (2003), Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics, Health Economics, 12: 281-294.

7. Carson, R., T. Groves and M. Machina (1999), Incentive and informational properties of preference questions, Plenary Address, 9th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE), Oslo, Norway, June.

8. Corso, P., J. Hammitt and J. Graham (2001), Valuing mortality-risk reduction: using visual aids to improve the validity of contingent valuation, The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23 (2): 165-184.

9. Greene W.H. (2000), Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, London.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Hanely, N., D. Macmillan, R. E. Wright, C. Bullock, I. Simpson, D. Parsisson and B. Crabtree (1998), Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49 (1): 1-15.

11. Hanemann, M. (1984), Discrete/continuous models of consumers demand, Econometrica, 52: 541-562.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Hanemann, M. (1999), Welfare analysis with discrete choice models, In Herriges, J. and C. Kling (Editors), Valuing recreation and the environment: Revealed preference methods in theory and practice, New Horizons in Environmental Economics, Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar, pp. 33-64, Hanemann, M. and B. Kanninen (1999), The statistical analysis of discrete response CV data, In Bateman, I. And K. Willies (Editors), Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries, Oxford University Press.

13. Hanemann, M., J. Loomis and B. Kanninen (1991), Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73 (4): 1255-1263.

14. Hoehn and Krieger (1998), Measuring Willingness to Pay for Urban Infrastructure Improvements, Staff Paper 98-10, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Kriström, B. (1997), Spike models in contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79: 1013-1023.

16. Lauria, D.T., D. Whittington, K.A. Choe, C. Turingan and V. Abiad (1999), Household demand for improved sanitation services: a case study of Calamba, the Philippines, In Bateman, I. And K. Willies (Editors), Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries, Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. LIMDEP 7.0. (2000), Econometric Software, Inc. Bellport, NY.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Loomis, J.B. and P.H. duVair (1993), Evaluating the effect of alternative risk communication devices on willingness to pay: results from a dichotomous choice contingent valuation experiment, Land Economics, 69: 287-298.

19. Louviere, J. (1988), Analyzing decision making: metric conjoint analysis, Sage University Papers, series no. 67, Newbury Park, CA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Louviere, J., D. Hensher and J. Swait (2000), Stated Choice Methods, Cambridge University Press.

21. Maddala G. (1993), Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, Econometric Society Monographs, 3. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. McFadden, D. (1974), Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, In Zarembka P. (Editor), Frontier in econometrics, Academic Press, New York, NY, 105-142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Press, J. and T. Söderqvist (1998), On estimating the benefits of groundwater protection: a contingent valuation study in Milan, In Swanson, T. and M. Vighi (Editors), Regulating chemical accumulation in the environment, Cambridge University Press, 121-182.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Reiser, B. and M. Shechter (1999), Incorporating zero values in the economic valuation of environmental program benefits, Environmetrics, 10: 87-101.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics. (2014). Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:i:4:p:717-745.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The impact of policy elements on the financing costs of RE investment: The case of wind power in Germany. (2011). Giebel, Olaf ; Breitschopf, Barbara.
   In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
   RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s112011.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny ; Stithou, Mavra.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ags:semrui:148928.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
   In: Agricultural Economics Review.
   RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
   In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
   RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models. (2008). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:umn:wpaper:0803.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Natural disturbances and natural hazards in mountain forests: a framework for the economic valuation. (2008). Notaro, Sandra ; Paletto, Alessandro.
   In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:trn:utwpde:0808.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
   In: IFPRI discussion papers.
   RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Van Houtven, George L. ; Gelso, Brett R..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
    RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:25:y:2006:i:4:p:855-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. DOES THE CONSUMERS VARIETY-SEEKING BEHAVIOR CONDITION THE WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL FURTHER?. (2006). Nicolau, Juan.
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. (2005). Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Bech, Mickael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:10:p:1079-1083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. (2005). Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A RANDOM PARAMETER LOGIT APPROACH TO THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAYS AND LENGTH OF STAY. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, Håkan ; Olsson, Bjorn .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael ; Provencher, Bill.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Effects of distance on non-use values. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple‐format, stated‐preference approach. (2000). Desvousges, William H. ; JOHNSON, REED F. ; Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Combining averting behavior and contingent valuation data: an application to drinking water treatment. (2000). Nunes, Luis ; Ducla-Soares, Maria M. ; ROSADO, MARCIA A. ; Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A., .
    In: Nova SBE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models. (2000). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heteregeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. (2000). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:263-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. What do doctors want? developing incentives for doctors to serve in Indonesias rural and remote areas. (1998). Widiyarti, ; Ismail, Nusye ; Chomitz, Kenneth M. ; Setiadi, Gunawan ; Azwar, Azrul.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Air Quality in Hamilton-Wentworth: A Choice Experiment. (1997). .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1997-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. (1996). Englin, Jeffrey ; Cameron, Trudy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-06 16:53:59 || Missing content? Let us know