1. The energetic and economic analysis of demand-driven biogas plant investment possibility in dairy farm. (2023). Rozakis, Stelios ; Mazurkiewicz, Jakub ; Dach, Jacek ; Nagele, Hans-Joachim ; Janczak, Damian ; Kowalczyk-Juko, Alina ; Czekaa, Wojciech ; Qiao, Wei ; Pochwatka, Patrycja.
   In: Energy.
   RePEc:eee:energy:v:283:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223025598.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Can Biogas Plants Become a Significant Part of the New Polish Energy Deal? Business Opportunities for Poland’s Biogas Industry. (2022). Mamica, Ukasz ; Wrobel-Rotter, Renata ; Mazur-Bubak, Monika.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1614-:d:738544.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Bioeconomy for Resilient Post-COVID Economies. (2022). Rozakis, Stelios ; Juvani, Luka ; Kovacs, Barna.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2958-:d:796294.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Is the Production of Agricultural Biogas Environmentally Friendly? Does the Structure of Consumption of First- and Second-Generation Raw Materials in Latvia and Poland Matter?. (2022). Filipiak, Tadeusz ; Wicki, Ludwik ; Naglis-Liepa, Kaspars ; Parzonko, Andrzej ; Wicka, Aleksandra.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5623-:d:879079.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Agostini A.; Battini F.; Padella M.; Giuntoli J.; Baxter D.; Marelli L.; Amaducci S. Economics of GHG emissions mitigation via biogas production from Sorghum, maize and dairy farm manure digestion in the Po valley. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 89, 58-66.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Al Seadi T.; Rutz D.; Prassl H.; Köttner M.; Finsterwalder T.; Volk S.; Janssen R. Biogas Handbook—University of Southern Denmark Esbjerg; Syddansk Universitet: Esbjerg, Denmark, 2008; ISBN 978-87-992962-0-0.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Appel F.; Ostermeyer-Wiethaup A.; Balmann A. Effects of the German Renewable Energy Act on structural change in agriculture—The case of biogas. Util. Policy 2016, 41, 172-182.

4. ARMA Database for the Agency for Restructuring and Modernisation of Agriculture (ARMA); Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation—State Research Institute (IUNG-PIB): Puławy, Poland, 2016.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. ASAE D384.2 MAR2005 Manure Production and Characteristics; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2005.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Bahrs E.; Angenendt E. Status quo and perspectives of biogas production for energy and material utilization. GCB Bioenergy 2019, 11, 9-20.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Banja M.; Jégard M.; Motola V.; Sikkema R. Support for biogas in the EU electricity sector—A comparative analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 128, 105313.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Bartoli A.; Ben Fradj N.; Gałczyńska M.; Jȩdrejek A.; Rozakis S.; Shu K. Spatial Economic Modeling of the Waste-driven Agricultural Biogas in Lubelskie Region, Poland. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2020, 24, 545-559.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Bartoli A.; Cavicchioli D.; Kremmydas D.; Rozakis S.; Olper A. The impact of different energy policy options on feedstock price and land demand for maize silage: The case of biogas in Lombardy. Energy Policy 2016, 96, 351-363.

10. Blumenstein B.; Siegmeier T.; Möller D. Economics of anaerobic digestion in organic agriculture: Between system constraints and policy regulations. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 86, 105-119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Britz W.; Ciaian P.; Gocht A.; Kanellopoulos A.; Kremmydas D.; Müller M.; Petsakos A.; Reidsma P. A design for a generic and modular bio-economic farm model. Agric. Syst. 2021, 191, 103133.

12. Bruins M.E.; Sanders J.P.M. Small-scale processing of biomass for biorefinery. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2012, 6, 135-145.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Bujoczek G.; Oleszkiewicz J.; Sparling R.; Cenkowski S. High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 2000, 76, 51-60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Chodkowska-Miszczuk J. Institutional Support for Biogas Enterprises—The Local Perspective. Quaest. Geogr. 2019, 38, 137-147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Chodkowska-Miszczuk J.; Kulla M.; Novotný L. The role of energy policy in agricultural biogas energy production in Visegrad countries. Bull. Geogr. 2017, 35, 19-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Delzeit R. Modelling Regional Maize Markets for Biogas Production in Germany: The Impact of Different Policy Options on Environment and Transport Emissions. Ph.D. Thesis; Universität zu Bonn: Bonn, Germany, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Delzeit R.; Britz W.; Holm-Müller K. Modelling regional input markets with numerous processing plants: The case of green maize for biogas production in Germany. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 32, 74-84.

18. Delzeit R.; Britz W.; Holm-Müller K. Modelling regional maize market and transport distances for biogas production in Germany. Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V; Landwirtschaftsverlag: Leipzig, Germany, 2010.

19. Dolfsma W.; Mamica Ł. Industrial Policy—An Institutional Economic Framework for Assessment. J. Econ. Issues 2020, 54, 349-355.

20. EBA Statistical Report 2018 Annual Statistical Report of the European Biogas Association Abriged Version; EBA: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Griffiths S.; Furszyfer Del Rio D.; Sovacool B. Policy mixes to achieve sustainable mobility after the COVID-19 crisis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110919.

22. Imeni S.M.; Puy N.; Ovejero J.; Busquets A.M.; Bartroli J.; Pelaz L.; Ponsá S.; Colón J. Techno-Economic Assessment of Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cattle Manure and Wheat Straw (Raw and Pre-treated) at Small to Medium Dairy Cattle Farms. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2019, 11, 4035-4051.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Jacobsen B.; Laugesen F.; Dubgaard A. The economics of biogas in Denmark: A farm and socioeconomic perspective. Int. J. Agric. Manag. 2014, 3, 1-10.

24. Janas M.; Zawadzka A. Assessment of environmental impact of agricultural biogas plants. Acta Innov. 2018, 27, 24-31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Janeiro L.; Resch G. 2020 Renewable Energy Target Realisation Forecast for Poland; Ecofys: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Jędrejek A.; Jarosz Z. Potencjał biomasy rolniczej na cele energetyczne w województwie lubelskim. Rocz. Nauk. Stowarzyszenia Ekon. Rol. I Agrobiz. 2016, 18, 61-65.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

27. Jena P.R.; Majhi R.; Kalli R.; Managi S.; Majhi B. Impact of COVID-19 on GDP of major economies: Application of the artificial neural network forecaster. Econ. Anal. Policy 2021, 69, 324-339. EUR-Lex—52020PC0408—EN—EUR-Lex. Krajowy Plan Odbudowy—Ministerstwo Rozwoju, Pracy i Technologii—Portal Gov.pl.

28. Koryś K.A.; Latawiec A.E.; Grotkiewicz K.; Kuboń M. The review of biomass potential for agricultural biogas production in Poland. Sustainability 2019, 11. Statistics Poland/Regional Statistics/Classification of Territorial Units/Classification of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS)/The NUTS Classification in Poland.

29. Krzystek L.; Wajszczuk K.; Pazera A.; Matyka M.; Slezak R.; Ledakowicz S. The Influence of Plant Cultivation Conditions on Biogas Production: Energy Efficiency. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2019, 11, 513-523.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Kuglarz K.; Bury M.; Kasprzycka A.; Lalak-Kańczugowska J. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the production of biogas from sweet sorghum and maize biomass. Environ. Technol. 2019, 41, 2833-2843.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Loizou E.; Jurga P.; Rozakis S.; Faber A. Assessing the potentials of bioeconomy sectors in Poland employing input-output modeling. Sustainability 2019, 11.

32. Mutani G.; Santantonio S.; Brunetta G.; Caldarice O.; Demichela M. An energy community for territorial resilience: Measurement of the risk of an energy supply blackout. Energy Build. 2021, 240, 110906.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Oniszk-Popławska A.; Matyka M.; Ryńska E.D. Evaluation of a long-term potential for the development of agricultural biogas plants: A case study for the Lubelskie Province, Poland. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 36, 329-349.

34. Ostermeyer A.; Schoenau F. Effects of biogas production on inter- and in-farm competition. Proceedings of the Agrarian Perspectives: The 100th Anniversary of Czech Agri-Economic Research: Innovation and Competitiveness of the Eu Agrarian Sector, Prague, Czech Republic, 18–19 September 2021, .

35. Piwowar A.; Dzikuć M.; Adamczyk J. Agricultural biogas plants in Poland—Selected technological, market and environmental aspects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 69-74.

36. Pöschl M.; Ward S.; Owende P. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 3305-3321.

37. Prazak R. Prospects for Sorghum cultivation in Poland. Acta Agrobot. 2016, 69, 1661.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Raven R.P.J.M.; Gregersen K.H. Biogas plants in Denmark: Successes and setbacks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 116-132.

39. Rozakis S.; Borek R. Evaluation of agricultural reactivation on abandoned lands in Poland. AgBioForum 2018, 21, 135-152.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. Rozakis S.; Sourie J.-C.; Vanderpooten D. Integrated micro-economic modelling and multi-criteria methodology to support public decision-making: The case of liquid bio-fuels in France. Biomass Bioenergy 2001, 20, 385-398.

41. Rzeznik W.; Mielcarek P. Agricultural biogas plants in Poland. Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, Latvia, 23–25 May 2018, ; pp. 1760-1765.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

42. Sefeedpari P.; Pudełko R.; Jędrejek A.; Kozak M.; Borzęcka M. To What Extent Is Manure Produced, Distributed, and Potentially Available for Bioenergy? A Step toward Stimulating Circular Bio-Economy in Poland. Energies 2020, 13.

43. Shu K.; Rozakis S.; Kozak M.; Fradj N.B. ZT Simulation of sorghum introduction and its impacts on land use change—A case study on Lubelski region of Eastern Poland. GCB Bioenergy 2019, 12, 252-274.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Shu K.; Schneider U.A.; Scheffran J. Bioenergy and food supply: A spatial-agent dynamic model of agricultural land use for Jiangsu Province in China. Energies 2015, 8, 13284-13307.

45. Simon S.; Wiegmann K. Modelling sustainable bioenergy potentials from agriculture for Germany and Eastern European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33, 603-609.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Sliz-Szkliniarz B.; Vogt J. A GIS-based approach for evaluating the potential of biogas production from livestock manure and crops at a regional scale: A case study for the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 752-763.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Sorda G.; Sunak Y.; Madlener R. An agent-based spatial simulation to evaluate the promotion of electricity from agricultural biogas plants in Germany. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 89, 43-60.

48. Sourie J.C.; Rozakis S. Bio-fuel production system in France: An Economic Analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2001, 20, 483-489.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Sulewski P.; Majewski E.; Wąs A. Supporting Sustainable Agriculture: The Potential to Reduce GHG Emissions—The Case of Agricultural Biogas Production in Poland. Rocz. Ochr. Sr. 2018, 20, 662-680.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Szabó G.; Fazekas I.; Szabó S.; Szabó G.; Buday T.; Paládi M.; Kisari K.; Kerényi A. The carbon footprint of a biogas power plant. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2014, 13, 2867-2874.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Tamburini E.; Gaglio M.; Castaldelli G.; Fano E.A. Biogas from agri-food and agricultural waste can appreciate agro-ecosystem services: The case study of Emilia Romagna region. Sustainability 2020, 12.

52. Van Der Horst D.; Martinat S.; Navratil J.; Dvorak P.; Chmielova P. What can the location of biogas plants tell us about agricultural change? A case study from the Czech Republic. Deturope 2018, 10, 33-52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Van Foreest F. Perspectives for Biogas in Europe; Oxford Institute for Energy Studies: Oxford, UK, 2012; ISBN 978-1-907555-63-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Zubrzycka M.; Wojdalski J.; Tucki K.; Zubrzycki M. Prospects for the Development of the Agricultural Biogas Sector in Poland. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. 2017, 16, 227-237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. The impact of energy justice on local economic outcomes: Evidence from the bioenergy village program in Germany. (2025). Yu, Xiaohua ; Maruejols, Lucie ; Hoeschle, Lisa.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:145:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325002567.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Surrogate modelling of a detailed farm‐level model using deep learning. (2024). Heckelei, Thomas ; Gall, Juergen ; Wang, Jifeng ; Storm, Hugo ; Appel, Franziska ; Schafer, David ; Shang, Linmei.
   In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
   RePEc:zbw:espost:282906.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Surrogate modelling of a detailed farm‐level model using deep learning. (2024). Heckelei, Thomas ; Shang, Linmei ; Gall, Juergen ; Wang, Jifeng ; Storm, Hugo ; Appel, Franziska ; Schafer, David.
   In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:bla:jageco:v:75:y:2024:i:1:p:235-260.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Biogas Energy Resources in Pakistan Status, Potential, and Barriers. (2023). Hayat, Tasawer ; Shah, Noor Samad ; Wakeel, Muhammad ; Iqbal, Jibran ; Rasool, Atta ; Ul, Zia.
   In: Utilities Policy.
   RePEc:eee:juipol:v:84:y:2023:i:c:s0957178723001558.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Increasing Biowaste and Manure in Biogas Feedstock Composition in Luxembourg: Insights from an Agent-Based Model. (2022). Porcel, Marta ; Myridinas, Maria ; Marvuglia, Antonino ; Bayram, Alper.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:264-:d:1013419.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Its Microbial Consortia: A Historical Review and Future Perspectives. (2022). Wang, Shuijing ; Song, Liyan ; Zhang, Jin ; Xu, Chenming.
   In: IJERPH.
   RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9519-:d:879059.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Economic Conditions of Using Biodegradable Waste for Biogas Production, Using the Example of Poland and Germany. (2022). Roycka, Monika ; Stasiak, Jacek ; Choma-Pierzecka, Ewa ; Sobo, Dariusz ; Sobczak, Anna ; Kokiel, Andrzej.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5239-:d:866510.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Nexus between renewable energy, foreign direct investment, and agro-productivity: The mediating role of carbon emission. (2022). Qamruzzaman, MD.
   In: Renewable Energy.
   RePEc:eee:renene:v:184:y:2022:i:c:p:526-540.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Farm growth and land concentration. (2022). Ritter, Matthias ; Odening, Martin ; Musshoff, Oliver ; Plogmann, Jana.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:115:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000631.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. German Farmers’ Perspectives on Price Drivers in Agricultural Land Rental Markets—A Combination of a Systematic Literature Review and Survey Results. (2021). Musshoff, Oliver ; Michels, Marius ; von Hobe, Cord-Friedrich.
    In: Land.
    RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:180-:d:496899.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Identifying the Necessities of Regional-Based Analysis to Study Germany’s Biogas Production Development under Energy Transition. (2021). Liu, Yang ; Yang, Xueqing ; Wang, Mei ; Thran, Daniela ; Bezama, Alberto.
    In: Land.
    RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:135-:d:490653.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Policy Impact on Regional Biogas Using a Modular Modeling Tool. (2021). Rozakis, Stelios ; Bartoli, Andrea ; Mamica, Ukasz ; Pudelko, Rafa ; Pochwatka, Patrycja ; Shu, Kesheng ; Dach, Jacek ; Jdrejek, Anna ; Kowalczyk-Juko, Alina.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3738-:d:579871.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Renewable energy generation from livestock waste for a sustainable circular economy in Bangladesh. (2021). TAGHIZADEH-HESARY, Farhad ; Sarker, Tapan ; Alam, Mohammad Shafiul ; Islam, Km Nazmul ; Atri, Anashuwa Chowdhury.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:139:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120309795.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Biogas production from small-scale anaerobic digestion plants on European farms. (2021). O'Connor, S ; Pillai, S C ; Bartlett, J ; Ehimen, E ; Tormey, D ; Black, A.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:139:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120308649.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Understanding stakeholder preferences for future biogas development in Germany. (2021). Venus, Thomas ; Sauer, Johannes ; Strauss, Felix.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721004270.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Spatio-temporal analysis of the effects of biogas production on agricultural lands. (2021). Fricke, Thomas ; Astor, Thomas ; Grass, Rudiger ; Wachendorf, Michael ; Kyere, Isaac.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720325783.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction. (2021). Heckelei, Thomas ; Rasch, Sebastian ; Gerullis, Maria K ; Shang, Linmei ; Borner, Jan.
    In: Agricultural Systems.
    RePEc:eee:agisys:v:190:y:2021:i:c:s0308521x21000275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Erfolgsfaktoren und Zukunftsaussichten für eine wirtschaftliche Biogasproduktion in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse. (2021). Mohrmann, Soren ; Schaper, Christian ; Steins, Aaron.
    In: 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021.
    RePEc:ags:gewi21:317072.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Assessing New Biotechnologies by Combining TEA and TM-LCA for an Efficient Use of Biomass Resources. (2020). Olsen, Stig Irving ; Birkved, Morten ; Voogt, Julien ; Sohn, Joshua ; Vega, Giovanna Croxatto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3676-:d:353237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. More Sustainable Bioenergy by Making Use of Regional Alternative Biomass?. (2020). Klenke, Thomas ; Tsydenova, Nina ; Grecksch, Kevin ; Wulf, Kalle ; Pehlken, Alexandra.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7849-:d:417735.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Modelling Future Agricultural Mechanisation of Major Crops in China: An Assessment of Energy Demand, Land Use and Emissions. (2020). Giarola, Sara ; Tuleu, Marin ; Kerdan, Ivan Garcia ; Skinner, Ellis ; Hawkes, Adam.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6636-:d:462966.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Farm growth and land concentration. (2020). Ritter, Matthias ; Odening, Martin ; Musshoff, Oliver ; Plogmann, Jana.
    In: 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri.
    RePEc:ags:aaea20:304514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Can land market regulations fulfill their promises?. (2019). Appel, Franziska ; Heinrich, Florian ; Balmann, Alfons.
    In: FORLand Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:forlwp:122019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Can land market regulations fulfill their promises?. (2019). Appel, Franziska ; Heinrich, Florian ; Balmann, Alfons.
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:208388.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Energy Crops in Regional Biogas Systems: An Integrative Spatial LCA to Assess the Influence of Crop Mix and Location on Cultivation GHG Emissions. (2019). Okeeffe, Sinead ; Thran, Daniela.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:237-:d:302479.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes. (2019). Duttmann, Rainer ; Szilassi, Peter ; Csikos, Nandor ; Kuhwald, Michael ; Schwanebeck, Malte.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2500-:d:226832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The Influence of Wind Energy and Biogas on Farmland Prices. (2019). Ritter, Matthias ; Odening, Martin ; Myrna, Olena.
    In: Land.
    RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:19-:d:197864.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision. (2019). Kreidenweis, Ulrich ; Theuerl, Susanne ; Grundmann, Philipp ; Landwehr, Niels ; Heiermann, Monika ; Herrmann, Christiane ; Prochnow, Annette.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:396-:d:201161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Promoting agricultural biogas and biomethane production: Lessons from cross-country studies. (2019). Zhu, Tong ; Curtis, John ; Clancy, Matthew.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:114:y:2019:i:c:37.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Estimating the revenue potential of flexible biogas plants in the power sector. (2019). Desideri, Umberto ; Lauven, Lars-Peter ; Geldermann, Jutta.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:128:y:2019:i:c:p:402-410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. FarmAgriPoliS: An agricultural business management game for behavioral experiments, teaching, and gaming. (2018). Rommel, Jens ; Balmann, Alfons ; Appel, Franziska ; Dong, Changxing.
    In: IAMO Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:iamodp:173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Factors affecting purchasing process of digestate: evidence from an economic experiment on Sicilian farmers’ willingness to pay. (2018). Bracco, Salvatore ; Selvaggi, Roberta ; Pappalardo, Gioacchino ; Chinnici, Gaetano ; Pecorino, Biagio.
    In: Agricultural and Food Economics.
    RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:6:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-018-0111-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Factors influencing prices for heat from biogas plants. (2018). Halbherr, Verena ; Braun, Lorenz ; Herbes, Carsten.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:221:y:2018:i:c:p:308-318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. A review of Agent Based Modeling for agricultural policy evaluation. (2018). Rozakis, Stelios ; Athanasiadis, Ioannis N ; Kremmydas, Dimitris.
    In: Agricultural Systems.
    RePEc:eee:agisys:v:164:y:2018:i:c:p:95-106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. FarmAgriPoliS: An agricultural business management game for behavioral experiments, teaching, and gaming. (2018). Rommel, Jens ; Balmann, Alfons ; Appel, Franziska ; Dong, Changxing.
    In: IAMO Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:iamodp:271455.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Predator or prey? - Effects of fast-growing farms on their neighborhood. (2018). Balmann, Alfons ; Appel, F.
    In: 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae18:277358.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Do investors ruin Germany s peasant agriculture?. (2018). Heinrich, F ; Appel, F.
    In: 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae18:277171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. ADAPTION DES AGRARSTRUKTURMODELLS AGRIPOLIS ZUR MODELLIERUNG AUßERLANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHER INVESTOREN IN DER BIOGASPRODUKTION. (2018). Appel, Franziska ; Heinrich, Florian.
    In: 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018.
    RePEc:ags:gewi18:275895.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. A review of global strategies promoting the conversion of food waste to bioenergy via anaerobic digestion. (2017). Wen, Zongguo ; Gottfried, Oliver ; Schmidt, Franziska ; Fei, Fan ; de Clercq, Djavan.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:204-221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Biogas digestate management: Evaluating the attitudes and perceptions of German gardeners towards digestate-based soil amendments. (2017). Nelles, Michael ; Dahlin, Johannes ; Herbes, Carsten.
    In: Resources, Conservation & Recycling.
    RePEc:eee:recore:v:118:y:2017:i:c:p:27-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. The Effect of Biogas Production on Farmland Rental Prices: Empirical Evidences from Northern Italy. (2016). Cavicchioli, Daniele ; Gelati, Marco ; Demartini, Eugenio ; Gaviglio, Anna.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:11:p:965-:d:83221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 08:28:28 || Missing content? Let us know