1. Wood-based textile innovations in the Finnish media: A critical discourse analysis. (2025). Nyh, Annukka ; Wallius, Venla.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000711.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Exploring potential diffusion pathways of biorefinery innovations—An agent‐based simulation approach for facilitating shared value creation. (2024). Stern, Tobias ; Plakolb, Simon ; Krassnitzer, Paul Erich ; Wenger, Julia ; Jager, Georg ; Nayha, Annukka.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:5:p:4652-4693.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Assessing Bioeconomy Development Opportunities in the Latvian Policy Planning Framework. (2023). Rozakis, Stelios ; Laktuka, Krista ; Blumberga, Dagnija.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1634-:d:1035645.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers. (2020). Quitzow, Rainer ; Ladu, Luana ; Gottinger, Alexandra.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8990-:d:436916.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature. (2020). O'Donoghue, Cathal ; Stout, Jane C ; Odonoghue, Cathal ; Neill, Andrew M.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8033-:d:421315.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europestrengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment: Updated Bioeconomy Strategy; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Akhtar-Schuster M.; Thomas R.J.; Stringer L.C.; Chasek P.; Seely M. Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation: Institutional, financial, legal and science-policy challenges and solutions. Land Degrad. Dev. 2011, 22, 299-312.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Altheide D. Process of Qualitative Document Analysis In Qualititive Media Analysis; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1996.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Assessing the Contribution of Bioeconomy to Countries’ Economy. 2018.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Biber-Freudenberger L.; Basukala A.; Bruckner M.; Börner J. Sustainability performance of national bio-economies. Sustainability 2018, 10. Dietz T.; Börner J.; Förster J.; von Braun J. Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies.

6. Birch K. Emergent imaginaries and fragmented policy frameworks in the canadian bio-economy. Sustainability 2016, 8.

7. Birner R. Bioeconomy concepts. Bioeconomy; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2018.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Bosman R.; Rotmans J. Transition Governance towards a Bioeconomy: A comparison of finland and the netherlands. Sustainability 2016, 8.

9. Bowen G.A. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual. Res. J. 2009, 9, 27-40.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Bugge M.; Hansen T.; Klitkou A. What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability 2016, 8.

11. Bullock C.; Morrison R. A National Biodiversity Review for Ireland; University College Dublin: Dublin, Ireland, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Cejudo G.M.; Michel C.L. Addressing fragmented government action: coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sci. 2017, 50, 745-767.

13. Climate Policy Integration, Coherence and Governance. 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Devaney L.; Henchion M. Consensus, caveats and conditions: International learnings for bioeconomy development. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 1400-1411.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Devaney L.; Henchion M. Who is a Delphi ‘expert’? Reflections on a bioeconomy expert selection procedure from Ireland. Futures 2018, 99, 45-55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Devaney L.A.; Henchion M. If opportunity doesn’t knock, build a door: Reflecting on a bioeconomy policy agenda for Ireland. Econ. Soc. Rev. 2017, 48, 207.

17. Elo S.; Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 2015, 62, 107-115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. England M.I.; Dougill A.J.; Stringer L.C.; Vincent K.E.; Pardoe J.; Kalaba F.K.; Mkwambisi D.D.; Namaganda E.; Afionis S. Climate change adaptation and cross-sectoral policy coherence in southern Africa. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2018, 18, 2059-2071.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. European Commission D.-G.f.R.a.I.E. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Gauttier P. Horizontal coherence and the external competences of the European Union. Eur. Law J. 2004, 10, 23-41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Geerlings H.; Stead D. The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research. Transp. Policy 2003, 10, 187-196.

22. Gouais A.L.; Wach E. A qualitative analysis of rural water sector policy documents. Water Altern. 2013, 6, 439-461.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Harahap F.; Silveira S.; Khatiwada D. Land allocation to meet sectoral goals in Indonesia—An analysis of policy coherence. Land Use Policy 2017, 61, 451-465.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Hausknost D.; Schriefl E.; Lauk C.; Kalt G. A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices. Sustainability 2017, 9.

25. Huttunen S.; Kivimaa P.; Virkamäki V. The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2014, 12, 14-30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Imbert E.; Ladu L.; Morone P.; Quitzow R. Comparing policy strategies for a transition to a bioeconomy in Europe: The case of Italy and Germany. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2017, 33, 70-81.

27. Kleinschmit D.; Arts B.; Giurca A.; Mustalahti I.; Sergent A.; Pülzl H. Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses. Int. For. Rev. 2017, 19, 2017-2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Laibach N.; Börner J.; Bröring S. Exploring the future of the bioeconomy: An expert-based scoping study examining key enabling technology fields with potential to foster the transition toward a bio-based economy. Technol. Soc. 2019, 58, 101118.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Lainez M.; González J.M.; Aguilar A.; Vela C. Spanish strategy on bioeconomy: Towards a knowledge based sustainable innovation. New Biotechnol. 2018, 40, 87-95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Lehtonen O.; Okkonen L. Regional socio-economic impacts of decentralised bioeconomy: A case of Suutela wooden village, Finland. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2013, 15, 245-256.

31. Lindstad B.H.; Pistorius T.; Ferranti F.; Dominguez G.; Gorriz-Mifsud E.; Kurttila M.; Leban V.; Navarro P.; Peters D.M.; Pezdevsek Malovrh S. Forest-based bioenergy policies in five European countries: An explorative study of interactions with national and EU policies. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 80, 102-113.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Martins F.; Felgueiras C.; Smitkova M.; Caetano N. Analysis of Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption and Environmental Impacts in European Countries. Energies 2019, 12.

33. May P.; Sapotichne J.; Workman S. Policy Coherence and Policy Domains. Policy Stud. J. 2006, 34, 381-403.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Meyer R. Bioeconomy strategies: Contexts, visions, Guiding implementation principles and resulting debates. Sustainability 2017, 9.

35. National Policy Statement on the Bioeconomy. 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Nilsson M.; Zamparutti T.; Petersen J.E.; Nykvist B.; Rudberg P.; McGuinn J.; Stockholms u.; Stockholm Environment I.; Stockholm Resilience C. Understanding Policy Coherence: Analytical Framework and Examples of Sector–Environment Policy Interactions in the EU. Environ. Policy Gov. 2012, 22, 395-423.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Priefer C.; Jörissen J.; Frör O. Pathways to shape the bioeconomy. Resource 2017, 6. Gawel E.; Pannicke N.; Hagemann N. A Path Transition towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Ramcilovic-Suominen S.; Pülzl H. Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework?. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 4170-4180.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Review of the EU bioeconomy strategy and its action plan. Expert group report - Study; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Rowley J. Using case studies in research. Manag. Res. News 2002, 25, 16-27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Shahab S.; Clinch J.P.; O’Neill E. An analysis of the factors influencing transaction costs in transferable development rights programmes. Ecological Econ. 2019, 156, 409-419.

42. Siitonen L. Theorising politics behind policy coherence for development (PCD). Eur. J. Dev. Res. 2016, 28, 1-12.

43. Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 2001, 7, 1-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Stern T.; Ploll U.; Spies R.; Schwarzbauer P.; Hesser F.; Ranacher L. Understanding perceptions of the bioeconomy in Austria—An explorative case study. Sustainability 2018, 10.

45. Suresh D. Case Study: Research Method for Social Sciences. 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. The World Factbook. 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Thomas R.; Bertolini L. Beyond the case study dilemma in urban planning: Using a meta-matrix to distil critical success factors in transit-oriented development. Urban Policy Res. 2014, 32, 219-237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Wesley J. Observing the Political World: Quantitative and Qualititative Approaches and Explorations: A Navigator’s Guide to Research. Explorations: A Navigator’s Guide to Quantitative Research in Canadian Political Science; Nelson Canada Publishing: Toronto, Canada, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Ylimartimo A. Case study on bioeconomy campus, central Finland. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefining 2018, 12, 177-186.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Deconstructing substitution narratives: The case of bioeconomy innovations from the forest-based sector. (2023). Befort, Nicolas ; Giurca, Alexandru.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:207:y:2023:i:c:s0921800923000162.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Walking the talk? Innovation policy approaches to unleash the transformative potentials of the Nordic bioeconomy. (2022). Hansen, Teis ; Wicken, Olav ; Bugge, Markus M ; Scordato, Lisa ; Tanner, Anne.
   In: Science and Public Policy.
   RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:324-346..

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science, technology, and innovation actors: A Norwegian case study. (2022). Nogueira, Leticia ; Hermann, Roberto Rivas ; Monteiro, Marko ; Pansera, Mario.
   In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
   RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:183:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522004267.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Supportive Business Environments to Develop Grass Bioeconomy in Europe. (2021). Orozco, Richard ; Grundmann, Philipp ; Adamseged, Muluken Elias ; Mosquera-Losada, Maria Rosa ; Rodriguez, Javier.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12629-:d:679870.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. An Overview of Bioplastic Research on Its Relation to National Policies. (2021). Falguera, Victor ; Garrido, Ricard ; Cabeza, Luisa F.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7848-:d:593854.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Factors for Bioeconomy Development in EU Countries with Different Overall Levels of Economic Development. (2021). Michaowska, Mariola ; Matuszczak, Anna ; Grzyb, Andrzej ; Czyewski, Andrzej.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3182-:d:564907.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Sustainability check for bio-based technologies: A review of process-based and life cycle approaches. (2021). Escobar, Neus ; Laibach, Natalie.
   In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
   RePEc:eee:rensus:v:135:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120305025.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Introducing a multiscalar framework for biocluster research: A meta-analysis. (2020). Hermans, Frans ; Ayrapetyan, David.
   In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
   RePEc:zbw:espost:217259.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Introducing a Multiscalar Framework for Biocluster Research: A Meta-Analysis. (2020). Hermans, Frans ; Ayrapetyan, David.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3890-:d:356058.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor Norway’s Bioeconomy in Transition. (2020). Capasso, Marco ; Klitkou, Antje.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3173-:d:345602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Food and Non-Food Biomass Production, Processing and Use in sub-Saharan Africa: Towards a Regional Bioeconomy. (2020). Denich, Manfred ; Jaenicke, Hannah ; Callo-Concha, Daniel ; Schmitt, Christine B.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2013-:d:329083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Potential Pathways to the German Bioeconomy: A Media Discourse Analysis of Public Perceptions. (2020). Dieken, Sophia ; Venghaus, Sandra.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7987-:d:420275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. (2020). Russo-Garrido, Sara ; Merveille, Nicolas ; Padilla-Rivera, Alejandro.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7912-:d:418777.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Monitoring Bioeconomy Transitions with Economic–Environmental and Innovation Indicators: Addressing Data Gaps in the Short Term. (2020). Wackerbauer, Johann ; Jander, Wiebke ; Wydra, Sven ; Piotrowski, Stephan ; Grundmann, Philipp.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4683-:d:368756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Sustainable Knowledge Management and Its Impact on the Performances of Biotechnology Organizations. (2019). Zbuchea, Alexandra ; Busu, Mihail ; Stan, Sergiu-Octavian ; Pinzaru, Florina ; Bargoanu, Alina.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:359-:d:197049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Policy Coherence and the Transition to a Bioeconomy: The Case of Ireland. (2019). Henchion, Maeve ; Kelleher, Luke ; Oneill, Eoin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7247-:d:298921.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Resources, Collaborators, and Neighbors: The Three-Pronged Challenge in the Implementation of Bioeconomy Regions. (2019). Okeeffe, Sinead ; Thran, Daniela ; Ingrao, Carlo ; Bezama, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7235-:d:298759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The Role of Renewables in a Low-Carbon Society: Evidence from a Multivariate Panel Data Analysis at the EU Level. (2019). Busu, Mihail.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5260-:d:270528.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability. (2019). Hagemann, Nina ; Pannicke, Nadine ; Gawel, Erik.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3005-:d:234896.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Adopting Circular Economy at the European Union Level and Its Impact on Economic Growth. (2019). Busu, Mihail.
    In: Social Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:5:p:159-:d:234154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Exploring the future of the bioeconomy: An expert-based scoping study examining key enabling technology fields with potential to foster the transition toward a bio-based economy. (2019). Bröring, Stefanie ; Broring, Stefanie ; Laibach, Natalie ; Borner, Jan.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:58:y:2019:i:c:s0160791x18302872.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Visions and Expectations for the Norwegian Bioeconomy. (2017). Hansen, Lillian ; Bjorkhaug, Hilde.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:341-:d:91438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Directionality across Diversity: Governing Contending Policy Rationales in the Transition towards the Bioeconomy. (2017). Fevolden, Arne ; Bugge, Markus M ; Scordato, Lisa.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:206-:d:89300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. The political economy of biodiesel in an era of low oil prices. (2017). Naylor, Rosamond L ; Higgins, Matthew M.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:695-705.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-25 09:29:43 || Missing content? Let us know