create a website

Organizations with Impact? A Study on Italian Benefit Corporations Reporting Practices and Reporting Quality. (2020). Mion, Giorgio.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9038-:d:437558.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 149

References cited by this document

Cocites: 30

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Mission statements and financial and sustainability performance: An exploratory study of Benefit Corporations certified as B Corps. (2023). Loza Adaui, Cristian ; de Crescenzo, Veronica ; Mion, Giorgio ; Bonfanti, Angelo.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:157:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322010505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Characterizing the mission statements of benefit corporations: Empirical evidence from Italy. (2021). Loza Adaui, Cristian ; Mion, Giorgio ; Bonfanti, Angelo.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:2160-2172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. About Integrated Reporting; International Integrated Reporting Council: London, UK, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Adams C.A.; Frost G.R. Accessibility and functionality of the corporate web site: Implications for sustainability reporting. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2006, 15, 275-287.

  3. Adler R.W.; Milne M.J. Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Account. Audit. Account. J. 1999, 12, 237-256.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Al-Shaer H.; Zaman M. Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality. J. Contemp. Account. Econ. 2016, 12, 210-222.

  5. Al-Tuwaijri S.A.; Christensen T.E.; Hughes K.E. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Account. Organ. Soc. 2004, 29, 447-471.

  6. Alberti F.G.; Varon Garrido M.A. Can profit and sustainability goals co-exist? New business models for hybrid firms. J. Bus. Strategy 2017, 38, 3-13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Alexius S.; Furusten S. Enabling sustainable transformation: Hybrid organizations in early phases of path generation. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 165, 547-563.

  8. André R. Assessing the Accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility?. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 110, 133-150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. André R. Benefit corporations at a crossroads: As lawyers weigh in, companies weigh their options. Bus. Horiz. 2015, 58, 243-252.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Anton Van Zanten J.; Van Tulder R.; Van Zanten J.A. Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. J. Int. Bus. Policy 2018, 1, 208-233.

  11. Bachoo K.; Tan R.; Wilson M. Firm value and the quality of sustainability reporting in Australia. Aust. Account. Rev. 2013, 23, 67-87.

  12. Bartlett C.A.; Ghoshal S. Changing the role of top management: Beyond strategy to purpose. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1994, 72, 79-88.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Battilana J.; Dorado S. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 2010, 53, 1419-1440.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Battilana J.; Lee M. Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2014, 8, 397-441.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Battilana J.; Lee M.; Walker J.; Dorsey C. In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanf. Soc. Innov. Rev. 2012, 51-55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Baudot L.; Dillard J.; Pencle N. The emergence of benefit corporations: A cautionary tale. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2020, 67–68.

  17. Beattie V.; McInnes B.; Fearnley S. A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Account. Forum 2004, 28, 205-236.

  18. Beck A.C.; Campbell D.; Shrives P.J. Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. Br. Account. Rev. 2010, 42, 207-222.

  19. Beretta S.; Bozzolan S. Quality versus quantity: The case of forward-looking disclosure. J. Account. Audit. Financ. 2008, 23, 333-376.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Bianchini M.; Sertoli C. Una ricerca Assonime sulle società benefit. Dati empirici, prassi statutaria e prospettive. Anal. Giuridica Econ. 2018, 1, 201-220.

  21. Bland J.M.; Altman D.G. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 1997, 314, 572.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Braam G.J.M.; Uit De Weerd L.; Hauck M.; Huijbregts M.A.J. Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: The importance of environmental performance and assurance. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 129, 724-734.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Brammer S.; Pavelin S. Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2008, 17, 120-136.

  24. Branch K.; Hooper D.A.; Thompson J.; Creighton J. Guide to Social Impact Assessment: A Framework for Assessing Social Change; Routledge: London, UK, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Calabrese A.; Costa R.; Ghiron N.L.; Menichini T. Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: A method for making it work in practice. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 6, 439-447.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Carley M.J.; Bustelo E.S. Social Impact Assessment and Monitoring: A Guide to the Literature; Routledge: London, UK, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Cetindamar D. Designed by law: Purpose, accountability, and transparency at benefit corporations. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2018, 5.

  28. Clarkson P.M.; Fang X.; Li Y.; Richardson G. The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative?. J. Account. Public Policy 2013, 32, 410-431.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Clarkson P.M.; Li Y.; Richardson G.D.; Vasvari F.P. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Account. Organ. Soc. 2008, 33, 303-327.

  30. Coda V. Il bene dell’impresa, bussola per comportamenti responsabili. Valori d’Impresa in Azione; Coda V.; Minoja M.; Tessitore A.; Vitale M. EGEA: Milan, Italy, 2012; pp. 75-104.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Coda V. Valori imprenditoriali e successo dell’impresa. Valori Imprenditoriali e Successo Aziendale; Bellante F.; Bertini U.; Butta C.; Coda V.; Cricchio S.; Lipari C.; Miraglia R.A.; Modica M.; Schillaci C.E.; Sorci C. Giuffrè: Milan, Italy, 1986; pp. 3-38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Collins J.L.; Kahn W.N. The hijacking of a new corporate form? Benefit corporations and corporate personhood. Econ. Soc. 2016, 45, 325-349.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Comyns B.; Figge F. Greenhouse gas reporting quality in the oil and gas industry: A longitudinal study using the typology of “search”, “experience” and “credence” information. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2015, 28, 403-433.

  34. Cooney K.; Lynch-Cerullo K. Measuring the social returns of nonprofits and social enterprises: The promise and perils of the SROI. Nonprofit Policy Forum 2014, 5, 367-393.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Cormier D.; Magnan M.; Van Velthoven B. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions?. Eur. Account. Rev. 2005, 14, 3-39.

  36. Corso S. Le società benefit nell’ordinamento italiano: Una nuova “qualifica” tra profit e non profit. Nuove Leggi Civ. Comment. 2016, 39, 995-1031.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Croux C.; Dehon C. Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures. Stat. Methods Appl. 2010, 19, 497-515.

  38. D’Amico E.; Coluccia D.; Fontana S.; Solimene S. Factors Influencing corporate environmental disclosure. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2016, 25, 178-192.

  39. Da Silva Monteiro S.M.; Aibar-Guzmán B. Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2010, 17, 185-204.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Defourny J.; Nyssens M. Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. J. Soc. Entrep. 2010, 1, 32-53.

  41. Defourny J.; Nyssens M. Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. Voluntas 2017, 28, 2469-2497.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Del Baldo M. Acting as a benefit corporation and a B Corp to responsibly pursue private and public benefits. The case of Paradisi Srl (Italy). Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2019, 4, 4.

  43. Delmas M.A.; Burbano V.C. The drivers of greenwashing. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2011, 54, 64-87.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Deskins M.R. Benefit corporation legislation, Version 1.0—A breakthrough in stakeholder rights?. Lewis Clark Law Rev. 2011, 15, 1048-1076.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Diouf D.; Boiral O. The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2017, 30, 643-667.

  46. Ebrahim A.; Rangan V.K. What impact? Aframework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2014, 56, 118-141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Esposito R.T. The social enterprise revolution in corporate law: A primer on emerging corporate entities in Europe and the United States and the case for the benefit corporation. William Mary Bus. Law Rev. 2013, 4, 639-714.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS; Sage: London, UK, 2009; ISBN 978-1-84787-907-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Fifka M.S. Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective—A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2013, 22, 1-35.

  50. Font X.; Guix M.; Bonilla-Priego M.J. Corporate social responsibility in cruising: Using materiality analysis to create shared value. Tour. Manag. 2016, 53, 175-186.

  51. Foundation 101; Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Gamerschlag R.; Möller K.; Verbeeten F. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2011, 5, 233-262.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Garzella S. L’azienda e la Corporate Social Responsibility. Approfondimenti Dottrinali e Riflessioni Gestionali; FrancoAngeli: Milano, Italy, 2018; ISBN 9788891784131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Gazzola P.; Ratti M.; Amelio S. CSR and sustainability report for nonprofit organizations. An Italian best practice. Manag. Dyn. Knowl. Econ. 2017, 5, 355-376.

  55. Gehman J.; Grimes M.G.; Cao K. Why we care about certified B Corporations: From valuing growth to certifying values practices. Acad. Manag. Discov. 2019, 5, 97-101.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Gelmini L.; Bavagnoli F.; Comoli M.; Riva P. Waiting for materiality in the context of integrated reporting: Theoretical challenges and preliminary empirical findings. Sustainability Disclosure: State of the Art and New Directions; Emerlad: Bingley, UK, 2015; pp. 135-163, ISBN 1479351220150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Gray R. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability ... and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Account. Organ. Soc. 2010, 35, 47-62.

  58. Guthrie J.; Petty R.; Yongvanich K.; Ricceri F. Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. J. Intellect. Cap. 2004, 5, 282-293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Hąbek P.; Wolniak R. Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: The case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Qual. Quant. 2016, 50, 399-420.

  60. Hahn R.; Kühnen M. Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 59, 5-21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Haigh N.; Hoffman A.J. The new heretics: Hybrid organizations and the challenges they present to corporate sustainability. Organ. Environ. 2014, 27, 223-241.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Haigh N.; Walker J.; Bacq S.; Kickul J. Hybrid organizations: Origins, strategies, impacts, and implications. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2015, 57, 5-12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Halsey B.J.; Tomkowicz S.M.; Halsey J.C. Benefit corporation concerns for financial service professionals. J. Financ. Serv. Prof. 2013, 74-83.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Helfaya A.; Whittington M.; Alawattage C. Exploring the quality of corporate environmental reporting Surveying preparers’ and users’ perceptions. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2018, 32, 163-193.

  65. Henderson R.; Van den Steen E. Why do firms have “purpose”? The firm’s role as a carrier of identity and reputation. Am. Econ. Rev. 2015, 105, 326-330.

  66. Herremans I.M.; Nazari J.A.; Mahmoudian F. Stakeholder relationships, engagement, and sustainability reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 2016.

  67. Herzig C.; Godemann J. Internet-supported sustainability reporting: Developments in Germany. Manag. Res. Rev. 2010, 33, 1064-1082.

  68. Hiller J.S. The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 118, 287-301.

  69. Hubbard G. Measuring organizational performance: Beyond the triple bottom line. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2009, 18, 177-191.

  70. Kennedy E.D.; Beaton E.; Haigh N. Increasing social impact among social enterprises and traditional firms. Handbook on Hybrid Organisations; Billis D.; Rochester C. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2020; pp. 251-272.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Khan M.; Serafeim G.; Yoon A. Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Account. Rev. 2016, 91, 1697-1724.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Krippendorff K. Reliability in content analysis. Hum. Commun. Res. 2004, 30, 411-433.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. La Disciplina delle Società Benefit; Assonime: Rome, Italy, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. La Situazione del Paese; Istat: Rome, Italy, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Laufer W.S. Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. J. Bus. Ethics 2003, 43, 253-261.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Leitoniene S.; Sapkauskiene A. Quality of corporate social responsibility information. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 213, 334-339.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Lindblom C.K. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Social and Environmental Accounting: Developing the Field; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2010; pp. 51-63, ISBN 1848601697.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Liu X.; Anbumozhi V. Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: An empirical study of Chinese listed companies. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 593-600.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Lyon T.P.; Maxwell J.W. Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. J. Econ. Manag. Strateg. 2011, 20, 3-41.

  80. Mahoney L.S.; Thorne L.; Cecil L.; LaGore W. A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing?. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2013, 24, 350-359.

  81. Manetti G. The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence and critical points. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2011, 18, 110-122.

  82. Matuszak Ł.; Rózańska E. CSR disclosure in Polish-listed companies in the light of directive 2014/95/EU requirements: Empirical evidence. Sustainability 2017, 9.

  83. McLoughlin J.; Kaminski J.; Sodagar B.; Khan S.; Harris R.; Arnaudo G.; Mc Brearty S. A strategic approach to social impact measurement of social enterprises. Soc. Enterp. J. 2009, 5, 154-178.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Meyskens M.; Paul K. The evolution of corporate social reporting practices in Mexico. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 91, 211-227.

  85. Michelon G.; Pilonato S.; Ricceri F. CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2015, 33, 59-78.

  86. Millar R.; Hall K. Social return on investment (SROI) and performance measurement: The opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care. Public Manag. Rev. 2013, 15, 923-941.

  87. Mion G. La cooperazione sociale: Un modello di hybrid organization?. Tra Economicità e Bene Comune. Analisi Critica delle Cooperative Sociali Come Hybrid Organizations; Broglia A.; Corsi C.; Farinon P.; Mion G. RIREA: Rome, Italy, 2017; pp. 49-89.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Mion G.; Loza Adaui C.R. Mandatory nonfinancial disclosure and its consequences on the sustainability reporting quality of Italian and German companies. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  89. Mion G.; Loza Adaui C.R. The effect of mandatory publication of nonfinancial disclosure in Europe on sustainability reporting quality: First insights about Italian and German companies. Non-Financial Disclosure and Integrated Reporting: Practices and Critical Issues; Songini L.; Pistoni A.; Baret P.; Kunc M. Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2020; pp. 55-80, ISBN 9781838679644.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Mion G.; Loza Adaui C.R. Understanding the purpose of benefit corporations: An empirical study on the Italian case. Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2020, 5, 1-15.

  91. Muff K.; Kapalka A.; Dyllick T. The Gap Frame—Translating the SDGs into relevant national grand challenges for strategic business opportunities. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2017, 15, 363-383.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Murray J.H. Choose your own master: Social enterprise, certifications, and benefit corporation statutes. Am. Univ. Bus. Law Rev. 2012, 2, 1-42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Nachar N. The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 2008, 4, 13-20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Nicholls J.; Lawlor E.; Neitzert E.; Goodspeee T. A guide to Social Return on Investment; The SROI Network: Liverpool, UK, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Nigri G.; Del Baldo M.; Agulini A. Governance and accountability models in Italian certified benefit corporations. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 2368-2380.

  96. Nigri G.; Michelini L.; Grieco C. Social impact and online communication in B-Corps. Glob. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 11, 87-104.

  97. Olsen S.; Galimidi B. Catalog of Approaches to Impact Measurement Assessing Social Impact in Private Ventures Version 1.1; Social Venture Technology Group with the support of The Rockefeller Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Palazzo G.; Scherer A.G. Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 66, 71-88.

  99. Palmieri M. L’interesse sociale: Dallo shareholder value alle società benefit. Banca Impresa Soc. 2017, XXXVI, 201-237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Parguel B.; Benoît-Moreau F.; Larceneux F. How sustainability ratings might deter “greenwashing”: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 102, 15-28.

  101. Parker S.C.; Gamble E.N.; Moroz P.W.; Branzei O. The impact of B Lab certification on firm growth. Acad. Manag. Discov. 2019, 5, 57-77.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Porter M.E.; Kramer M.R. The big idea. How to reinvent capitalism—And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011, 89, 1-17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Prado-Lorenzo J.M.; Gallego-Alvarez I.; Garcia-Sanchez I.M. Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: The ownership structure effect. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2009.

  104. Proposed Approaches to Social Impact Measurement in European Commission Legislation and in Practice Relating to EuSEFs and the EaSI; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  105. Puroila J.; Mäkelä H. Matter of opinion Exploring the socio-political nature of materiality disclosures in sustainability reporting. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2019, 32, 1043-1072.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Ramus C.A.; Montiel I. When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing?. Bus. Soc. 2005, 44, 377-414.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  107. Rawhouser H.; Cummings M.; Newbert S.L. Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2019, 43, 82-115.

  108. Reverte C. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. J. Bus. Ethics 2009, 88, 351-366.

  109. Rikhardsson P.; Raj Andersen A.J.; Bang H. Sustainability reporting on the internet. Greener Manag. Int. 2014, 2002, 57-75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  110. Riolfo G. The new Italian benefit corporation. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 2019, 21, 279-317.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  111. Robson R. A new look at benefit corporations: Game theory and game changer. Am. Bus. Law J. 2015, 52, 501-555.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  112. Roca L.C.; Searcy C. An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 20, 103-118.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  113. Roche C. Impact Assessment for Development Agencies: Learning to Value Change; Oxfam: Oxford, UK, 1999.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  114. Rosner B.; Grove D. Use of the Mann-Whitney U-test for clustered data. Stat. Med. 1999, 18, 1387-1400.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  115. Sawilowsky S.; Fahoome G. Kruskal-Wallis test: Basic. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  116. Scheyvens R.; Banks G.; Hughes E. The private sector and the SDGs: The need to move beyond ‘business as usual’. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 24, 371-382.

  117. Sethi S.P.; Martell T.F.; Demir M. An evaluation of the quality of corporate social responsibility reports by some of the world’s largest financial institutions. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 140, 787-805.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  118. Sharma G.; Beveridge A.J.; Haigh N. A configural framework of practice change for B Corporations. J. Bus. Ventur. 2018, 33, 207-224.

  119. Siano A.; Vollero A.; Conte F.; Amabile S. “More than words”: Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 71, 27-37.

  120. Sierra-Garcia L.; Garcia-Benau M.A.; Bollas-Araya H.M. Empirical analysis of non-financial reporting by Spanish companies. Adm. Sci. 2018, 8.

  121. Signori S.; Rusconi G. Ethical thinking in traditional italian economia aziendale and the stakeholder management theory: The search for possible interactions. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 89, 303-318.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  122. Smith N.C.; Rönnegard D. Shareholder primacy, corporate social responsibility, and the role of business schools. J. Bus. Ethics 2016, 134, 463-478.

  123. Smith W.K.; Gonin M.; Besharov M.L. Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Bus. Ethics Q. 2018, 233, 407-442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  124. Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation; The Business Roundtable: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  125. Stecker M.J. Awash in a sea of confusion: Benefit corporations, social enterprise, and the fear of “greenwashing”. J. Econ. Issues 2016, 50, 373-381.

  126. Steenkamp N.; Northcott D. Content analysis in accounting research: The practical challenges. Aust. Account. Rev. 2007, 17, 12-25.

  127. Stubbs W. Examining the interplay of social and market logics in hybrid business models: A case study of Australian B Corps. Sustainable Business Models: Principles, Promise, and Practice; Moriatis L.; Melissen F.; Idowu S.O. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 63-84.

  128. Stubbs W. Strategies, practices, and tensions in managing business model innovation for sustainability: The case of an Australian B Corp. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 1063-1072.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  129. Sutantoputra A.W. Social disclosure rating system for assessing firms’ CSR reports. Corp. Commun. 2009, 14, 34-48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  130. Tavakol M.; Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2011, 2, 53-55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  131. Testi E.; Bellucci M.; Franchi S.; Biggeri M. Italian social enterprises at the crossroads: Their role in the evolution of the welfare state. Voluntas 2017, 28, 2403-2422.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  132. Thomas A. The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas 2004, 15, 243-263.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  133. Torelli R.; Balluchi F.; Furlotti K. The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 470-484.

  134. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  135. Unerman J. Methodological issues—Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2000, 13, 667-681.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  136. Van Staden C.J.; Hooks J. A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. Br. Account. Rev. 2007, 39, 197-210.

  137. Vaughan S.K.; Arsneault S. The Public Benefit of Benefit Corporations; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 54-60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  138. Villela M.; Bulgacov S.; Morgan G. B Corp certification and its impact on organizations over time. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 1, 3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  139. Whitehead J. Prioritizing sustainability indicators: Using materiality analysis to guide sustainability assessment and strategy. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2017, 26, 399-412.

  140. Wilburn K.; Wilburn R. Evaluating CSR accomplishments of founding certified B Corps. J. Glob. Responsib. 2015, 6, 262-280.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  141. Williams A.; Whiteman G.; Parker J.N. Backstage interorganizational collaboration: Corporate endorsement of the sustainable development goals. Acad. Manag. Discov. 2019, 5, 367-395.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  142. Williams F. The business case for purpose. Perspectives on Purpose; Taylor & Francis: Milton, UK, 2019; pp. 9-17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  143. Williams S.M.; Ho Wern Pei C.-A. Corporate social disclosures by listed companies on their web sites: An international comparison. Int. J. Account. 1999, 34, 389-419.

  144. Wilson M. A Critical review of environmental sustainability reporting in the consumer goods industry: Greenwashing or good business?. J. Manag. Sustain. 2013, 3, 1-13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  145. Wirth C. Benefit Corporation Reporting Requirements; Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  146. Wolf J. The economy effect: Conceptual innovation and benefit corporations. New Polit. Sci. 2018, 40, 264-284.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  147. Wolniak R.; Hąbek P. Quality assessment of CSR reports—Factor analysis. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 220, 541-547.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  148. Yosifon D.G. Opting out of shareholder primacy: Is the public benefit corporation trivial?. Del. J. Corp. Law 2017, 41, 461-508.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  149. Zimmerman D.W. Comparative power of student T test and Mann-Whitney U test for unequal sample sizes and variances. J. Exp. Educ. 1987, 55, 171-174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance and the moderation of mixed‐ownership reform: The evidence from Chinese state‐owned enterprises. (2024). Zhang, Shenshen.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:2195-2210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Does the Ownership of Water Utilities Influence Water-Saving Advice Provided to Service Users? An Analysis of the Spanish Water Sector. (2023). Lopez-Ruiz, Samara ; Ibaez-Rueda, Nazaret ; Guardiola, Jorge ; Gonzalez-Gomez, Francisco.
    In: Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA).
    RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03503-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Biodiversity accountability in water utilities: A case study. (2023). Ligorio, Lorenzo ; de Nuccio, Elbano ; Venturelli, Andrea.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s0957178723000073.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Digital Transformation of Value Chains and CSR Performance. (2022). Li, Yuting ; Chen, Xue ; Wang, Xiaolan ; Na, Chaohong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10245-:d:890969.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Cultural organizations, digital Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholder engagement in virtual museums: a multiple case study. How digitization is influencing the attitude toward CSR. (2021). Ricci, Paolo ; Esposito, Paolo.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:953-964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Application of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Principles for Measuring Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan. (2021). Zahra, Sadaf ; Ali, Rao Akmal ; Tufail, Muhammad S ; Saleem, Muhammad A ; Ismail, Hina.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11409-:d:657316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Hoftsedes cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility in online communication: Are they independent constructs?. (2020). Amabile, Sara ; Palazzo, Maria ; Siano, Alfonso ; Vollero, Agostino.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:53-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Communication Strategies for the 2030 Agenda Commitments: A Multivariate Approach. (2020). Amor-Esteban, Victor ; Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria ; Galindo-Alvarez, David.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10554-:d:463532.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Organizations with Impact? A Study on Italian Benefit Corporations Reporting Practices and Reporting Quality. (2020). Mion, Giorgio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9038-:d:437558.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Committed vs opportunistic corporate and social responsibility reporting. (2020). Gonçalves, Tiago ; Gonalves, Tiago ; Costa, Eva ; Gaio, Cristina.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:115:y:2020:i:c:p:417-427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A longitudinal Analysis of its Evolutionary Pattern. (2019). Bani-Khalid, Tareq O.
    In: International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences.
    RePEc:hur:ijaraf:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:17-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Fuzzy reporting as a way for a company to greenwash: perspectives from the Colombian reality. (2017). Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando ; Claasen, Cyrlene.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:85472.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Corporate Governance and Climate Change Reporting in Malaysia. (2017). Omar, Nor Bahiyah ; Amran, Azlan.
    In: International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.
    RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:7:y:2017:i:12:p:222-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Communicating Sustainability: An Operational Model for Evaluating Corporate Websites. (2016). Conte, Francesca ; Amabile, Sara ; Piciocchi, Paolo ; Siano, Alfonso ; Vollero, Agostino.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:950-:d:78521.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Stakeholder Engagement, Corporate Social Responsibility and Integrated Reporting: An Exploratory Study. (2015). Grima, Simon ; Garciabenau, Maria A ; Sierragarcia, Laura ; Zoriogrima, Ana.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:22:y:2015:i:5:p:286-304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Engaging stakeholders through Facebook. The case of Global Compact LEAD participants. (2015). Bosetti, Luisa.
    In: Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences.
    RePEc:sek:ibmpro:3005158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The Impact of Business Strategies on Online Sustainability Disclosures. (2015). Devi, Susela S ; Ooi, Say Keat ; Mydin, Riduan Toani ; Amran, Azlan.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:24:y:2015:i:6:p:551-564.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The Quality of Non-Financial Information on Internet Business Reporting for Malaysian Public Listed Companies (PLCs). (2015). Rahman, Rahida Abdul ; Abd, Mohd Zulkeflee ; Ilias, Azleen.
    In: International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies.
    RePEc:apa:ijbaas:2015:p:165-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. THE ROLE OF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR CSR COMMUNICATION. (2014). Melia, Monia ; Tomaselli, Gianpaolo.
    In: Economy & Business Journal.
    RePEc:isp:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:324-340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A Review of Dutch Corporate Sustainable Development Reports. (2013). Santos, Paulo Dos ; Asif, Muhammad ; Kensah, David ; Searcy, Cory.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:20:y:2013:i:6:p:321-339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Why Do Companies Not Produce Sustainability Reports?. (2013). Stubbs, Wendy ; Milne, Markus ; Higgins, Colin.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:22:y:2013:i:7:p:456-470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis. (2013). Fifka, Matthias S.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:22:y:2013:i:1:p:1-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Factores determinantes del nivel de compromiso medioambiental. (2012). Esteban, Perez Calderon ; Montero, Patricia Milanes ; Ortega Rossel Francisco Javier, .
    In: Contaduría y Administración.
    RePEc:nax:conyad:v:57:y:2012:i:4:p:197-233.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach. (2012). Berg, Nicola ; Jensen, Julia Catharina.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:21:y:2012:i:5:p:299-316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Critical Reflective Organizations: An Empirical Observation of Global Active Citizenship and Green Politics. (2010). Arevalo, Jorge.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:96:y:2010:i:2:p:299-316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context. (2010). Shrives, Philip J ; Campbell, David ; Beck, Cornelia A.
    In: The British Accounting Review.
    RePEc:eee:bracre:v:42:y:2010:i:3:p:207-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet. (2010). Morhardt, Emil J.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:19:y:2010:i:7:p:436-452.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Sustainable tourism in Greek islands: the integration of activity‐based environmental management with a destination environmental scorecard based on the adaptive resource management paradigm. (2010). Spilanis, Ioannis ; Karatzoglou, Benjamin.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:26-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes?. (2009). Laine, Matias.
    In: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
    RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:22:y:2009:i:7:p:1029-1054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Sustainability reporting in Norway – an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio‐political drivers. (2009). Vormedal, Irja ; Ruud, Audun.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:18:y:2009:i:4:p:207-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-02 21:22:18 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.