1. Analysis of the quality of sustainability reports published by Brazilian companies: An analytic hierarchy process‐grey clustering approach. (2024). Zanon, Lucas Gabriel ; de Souza, Jefferson ; Rampasso, Izabela Simon ; de Sousa, Isabela Caroline ; Anholon, Rosley ; Filho, Walter Leal.
   In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
   RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4298-4314.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Sustainability Performance Reporting. (2024). Paulette, Laura ; Pop, Horia ; Odagiu, Antonia ; Rusu, Teodora Maria.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8538-:d:1490033.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Financial and Non-Financial Disclosures for Agriculture: is there any Connection in between GRI 13 and IAS 41?. (2023). Hoinaru, Razvan ; Subic, Jonel ; Buda, Daniel ; Jansen, Adela.
   In: REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT.
   RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:24:y:2023:i:2:p:158-172.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Decent work in non-financial reporting of Russian companies: Assessing the disclosure quality. (2022). Kuklina, Tatyana V ; Arabov, Nurali U ; German, Maria V ; Nekhoda, Evgeniya V ; Bogdanov, Aleksandr L.
   In: Upravlenets.
   RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:34-56.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Abd‐Mutalib, H.; Jamil, C.Z.M.; Wan‐Hussin, W.N. The Availability, Extent and Quality of Sustainability Reporting by Malay‐ sian Listed Firms: Subsequent to Mandatory Disclosure. Asian J. Financ. Account. 2014, 6, 239–260.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Abdillah, A.A.; Husin, N.M. A Longitudinal Examination Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Practices among Top Banks in Malaysia. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 35, 10–16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212‐5671(16)00004‐6.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Adams, C.A.; Frost, G.R. Accessibility and functionality of the corporate web site: Implications for sustainability reporting. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2006, 15, 275–287.

4. Ali, W.; Frynas, J.G.; Mahmood, Z. Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Devel‐ oping Countries: A Literature Review. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2017, 24, 273–294.

5. Alotaibi, K.O.; Hussainey, K. Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non‐financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Discl. Gov. 2016, 13, 364–393.

6. Ane, P. An Assessment of the Quality of Environmental Information Disclosure of Corporation in China. Syst. Eng. Procedia 2012, 5 (Suppl. C), 420–426, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2012.04.064.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Anis, R.; Fraser I.; Hussainey K. A New Measure for Disclosure Quality; working paper; Stirling University: Scotland, UK, 2012.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Aras, G.; Tezcan, N.; Kutlu Furtuna, O. Multidimensional comprehensive corporate sustainability performance evaluation model: Evidence from an emerging market banking sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 600–609, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle‐ pro.2018.01.175.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Archel, P.; Husillos, J.; Spence, C. The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of Corporate Social Responsi‐ bility discourse. Account. Organ. Soc. 2011, 36, 327–343.

10. Beest; Braam, G.; Boelens, S. Quality of Financial Reporting: Measuring Qualitative Characteristics. Available Online: https://re‐ pository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/74896/74896.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Beretta, S.; Bozzolan S. A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. Int. J. Account. 2004, 39, 265–288.

12. Beretta, S.; Bozzolan, S. Quality versus quantity: The case of forward‐looking disclosure. J. Account. Audit. Financ. 2008, 23, 333–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Boiral, O. Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter‐account of A and A+ GRI reports. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2013, 26, 1036–1071.

14. Botosan, C.A. Discussion of a framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. Int. J. Account. 2004, 39, 289–295.

15. Brammer, S.; Pavelin, S. Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2008, 17, 120–136, doi:10.1002/bse.506.

16. Brown, H.S.; de Jong, M.; Lessidrenska, T. The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environ. Politics 2009, 18, 182–200, doi:10.1080/09644010802682551.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Chakroun, R.; Hussainey K. Disclosure quality in Tunisian annual reports. Corp. Ownersh. Control 2014, 11, 58–80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Cho Michelon, G.; Patten, D.M. Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Account. Public Interest 2012, 12, 16–37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Comyns, B. Climate Change Reporting and Multinational Companies: Insights from Institutional Theory and International Business. In Accounting Forum; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Cormier, D.; Magnan M.; Van Velthoven B. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? Eur. Account. Rev. 2005, 14, 3–39.

21. Deegan, C.; Gordon, B. A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Account. Bus. Res. 1996, 26, 187–199.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Diouf, D.; Boiral, O. The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2017, 30, 643–667.

23. Dobers, P.; Halme, M. Corporate social responsibility and developing countries. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2009, 16, 237–249, doi:10.1002/csr.212.

24. Everaert, P.; Bouten, L.; Van Liedekerke, L.; De Moor, L.; Christiaens, J. Voluntary Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility by Belgian Listed Firms: A Content Analysis of Annual Reports; Citeseer: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2007.

25. Fifka, M.S. Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective—A Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2013, 22, 1–35, doi:10.1002/bse.729.

26. Gray, R. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Account. Organ. Soc. 2010, 35, 47–62.

27. Habek, P.; Wolniak, R. Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: The case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Qual. Quant. 2016, 50, 399–420, doi:10.1007/s11135‐014‐0155‐z.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Habek, P.; Wolniak, R. Factors influencing the development of CSR reporting practices: Experts’ versus preparers’ points of view. Eng. Econ. 2015, 26, 560–570.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Hammond, K.; Miles, S. Assessing Quality Assessment of Corporate Social Reporting: UK Perspectives; In Accounting Forum; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004.

30. Ismail, H.; Mahmood Z. CSR Profile of Developing Nations: A Content Analysis of CSR Reports of Listed Companies in Paki‐ stan. Pak. J. Soc. Sci. (PJSS) 2019, 39, 1681–1698.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Langer, M. Comparability of sustainability reports. A comparative content analysis of Austrian sustainability reports. In Sustainability Accounting and Reporting; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 581–602.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Leitoniene, S.; Sapkauskiene, A. Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Information. Procedia‐Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 213, 334– 339, doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.547.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Mahmood, Z.; Kouser, R.; Ali, W.; Ahmad, Z.; Salman, T. Does Corporate Governance Affect Sustainability Disclosure? A Mixed Methods Study. Sustainability 2018, 10, 207.

34. Martin, P.R.; Moser, D.V. Managers’ green investment disclosures and investors’ reaction. J. Account. Econ. 2016, 61, 239–254.

35. Masulis, R.W.; Wang C.; Xie F. Globalizing the boardroom—The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. J. Account. Econ. 2012, 53, 527–554.

36. Michelon, G.; Pilonato, S.; Ricceri, F. CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2015, 33, 59–78, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003.

37. Morhardt, J.E. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2010, 19, 436–

38. Odriozola, M.D.; Baraibar‐Diez, E. Is Corporate Reputation Associated with Quality of CSR Reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2017, 24, 121–132.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Ortas, E.; Gallego‐Alvarez, I.; Etxeberria, I.. Financial Factors Influencing the Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Disclosure: A Quantile Regression Approach. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2015, 22, 362– 380, doi:10.1002/csr.1351. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11409 18 of 19

40. Pizzi, S.; Venturelli, A.; Caputo, F. The “comply‐or‐explain” principle in directive 95/2014/EU. A rhetorical analysis of Italian PIEs. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 2020, 12, 30–50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Prado‐Lorenzo, J.M.; Gallego‐Alvarez, I.; Garcia‐Sanchez, I.M. Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: The ownership structure effect. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2009, 16, 94–107.

42. Raar, J. Environmental initiatives: Towards triple‐bottom line reporting. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2002, 7, 169–183.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. van Staden, C.J.; Hooks, J. A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. Br. Account. Rev. 2007, 39, 197–210.

44. Yuan, J.; Wang, Y.; Hu, W.; Bruno, A. The reliability and validity of a novel Chinese version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire (2011). BMC Neurol. 2020, 20, 127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance and the moderation of mixed‐ownership reform: The evidence from Chinese state‐owned enterprises. (2024). Zhang, Shenshen.
   In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
   RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:2195-2210.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Does the Ownership of Water Utilities Influence Water-Saving Advice Provided to Service Users? An Analysis of the Spanish Water Sector. (2023). Lopez-Ruiz, Samara ; Ibaez-Rueda, Nazaret ; Guardiola, Jorge ; Gonzalez-Gomez, Francisco.
   In: Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA).
   RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03503-2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Biodiversity accountability in water utilities: A case study. (2023). Ligorio, Lorenzo ; de Nuccio, Elbano ; Venturelli, Andrea.
   In: Utilities Policy.
   RePEc:eee:juipol:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s0957178723000073.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Digital Transformation of Value Chains and CSR Performance. (2022). Li, Yuting ; Chen, Xue ; Wang, Xiaolan ; Na, Chaohong.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10245-:d:890969.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Cultural organizations, digital Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholder engagement in virtual museums: a multiple case study. How digitization is influencing the attitude toward CSR. (2021). Ricci, Paolo ; Esposito, Paolo.
   In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
   RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:953-964.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Application of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Principles for Measuring Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan. (2021). Zahra, Sadaf ; Ali, Rao Akmal ; Tufail, Muhammad S ; Saleem, Muhammad A ; Ismail, Hina.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11409-:d:657316.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Hoftsedes cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility in online communication: Are they independent constructs?. (2020). Amabile, Sara ; Palazzo, Maria ; Siano, Alfonso ; Vollero, Agostino.
   In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
   RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:53-64.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Communication Strategies for the 2030 Agenda Commitments: A Multivariate Approach. (2020). Amor-Esteban, Victor ; Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria ; Galindo-Alvarez, David.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10554-:d:463532.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Organizations with Impact? A Study on Italian Benefit Corporations Reporting Practices and Reporting Quality. (2020). Mion, Giorgio.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9038-:d:437558.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Committed vs opportunistic corporate and social responsibility reporting. (2020). Gonçalves, Tiago ; Gonalves, Tiago ; Costa, Eva ; Gaio, Cristina.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:115:y:2020:i:c:p:417-427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A longitudinal Analysis of its Evolutionary Pattern. (2019). Bani-Khalid, Tareq O.
    In: International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences.
    RePEc:hur:ijaraf:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:17-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Fuzzy reporting as a way for a company to greenwash: perspectives from the Colombian reality. (2017). Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando ; Claasen, Cyrlene.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:85472.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Corporate Governance and Climate Change Reporting in Malaysia. (2017). Omar, Nor Bahiyah ; Amran, Azlan.
    In: International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.
    RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:7:y:2017:i:12:p:222-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Communicating Sustainability: An Operational Model for Evaluating Corporate Websites. (2016). Conte, Francesca ; Amabile, Sara ; Piciocchi, Paolo ; Siano, Alfonso ; Vollero, Agostino.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:950-:d:78521.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Stakeholder Engagement, Corporate Social Responsibility and Integrated Reporting: An Exploratory Study. (2015). Grima, Simon ; Garciabenau, Maria A ; Sierragarcia, Laura ; Zoriogrima, Ana.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:22:y:2015:i:5:p:286-304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Engaging stakeholders through Facebook. The case of Global Compact LEAD participants. (2015). Bosetti, Luisa.
    In: Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences.
    RePEc:sek:ibmpro:3005158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. The Impact of Business Strategies on Online Sustainability Disclosures. (2015). Devi, Susela S ; Ooi, Say Keat ; Mydin, Riduan Toani ; Amran, Azlan.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:24:y:2015:i:6:p:551-564.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The Quality of Non-Financial Information on Internet Business Reporting for Malaysian Public Listed Companies (PLCs). (2015). Rahman, Rahida Abdul ; Abd, Mohd Zulkeflee ; Ilias, Azleen.
    In: International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies.
    RePEc:apa:ijbaas:2015:p:165-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. THE ROLE OF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR CSR COMMUNICATION. (2014). Melia, Monia ; Tomaselli, Gianpaolo.
    In: Economy & Business Journal.
    RePEc:isp:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:324-340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. A Review of Dutch Corporate Sustainable Development Reports. (2013). Santos, Paulo Dos ; Asif, Muhammad ; Kensah, David ; Searcy, Cory.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:20:y:2013:i:6:p:321-339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Why Do Companies Not Produce Sustainability Reports?. (2013). Stubbs, Wendy ; Milne, Markus ; Higgins, Colin.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:22:y:2013:i:7:p:456-470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis. (2013). Fifka, Matthias S.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:22:y:2013:i:1:p:1-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Factores determinantes del nivel de compromiso medioambiental. (2012). Esteban, Perez Calderon ; Montero, Patricia Milanes ; Ortega Rossel Francisco Javier, .
    In: Contaduría y Administración.
    RePEc:nax:conyad:v:57:y:2012:i:4:p:197-233.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach. (2012). Berg, Nicola ; Jensen, Julia Catharina.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:21:y:2012:i:5:p:299-316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Critical Reflective Organizations: An Empirical Observation of Global Active Citizenship and Green Politics. (2010). Arevalo, Jorge.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:96:y:2010:i:2:p:299-316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context. (2010). Shrives, Philip J ; Campbell, David ; Beck, Cornelia A.
    In: The British Accounting Review.
    RePEc:eee:bracre:v:42:y:2010:i:3:p:207-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet. (2010). Morhardt, Emil J.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:19:y:2010:i:7:p:436-452.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Sustainable tourism in Greek islands: the integration of activity‐based environmental management with a destination environmental scorecard based on the adaptive resource management paradigm. (2010). Spilanis, Ioannis ; Karatzoglou, Benjamin.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:26-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes?. (2009). Laine, Matias.
    In: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
    RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:22:y:2009:i:7:p:1029-1054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Sustainability reporting in Norway – an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio‐political drivers. (2009). Vormedal, Irja ; Ruud, Audun.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:18:y:2009:i:4:p:207-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-23 04:39:31 || Missing content? Let us know