- Abadi, A. A Study of Innovation Perception within the Construction Industry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2014.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Adams, R.; Bessant, J.; Phelps, R. Innovation management measurement: A review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2006, 8, 21â47. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Amato, F.; Casola, V.; Esposito, M.; Mazzeo, A.; Mazzocca, N. A smart decision support systems based on a fast classifier and a semantic post reasoner. Int. J. Syst. Syst. Eng. 2013, 4, 317â336. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ashour, M. Triangulation as a powerful methodological research technique in technology-based services. Bus. Manag. Stud. Int. J. 2018, 6, 193â208. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Available online: http://www.aecbytes.com/viewpoint/2013/issue_67.html (accessed on 18 November 2013).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bartes, F. Competitive Intelligence. In Management, Economics and Business Development in European Conditions; Brno University of Technology: Brno, Czech Republic, 2009; ISBN 978-80-214-3893-4.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- BCG. Innovation 2007: A BCG Senior Management Survey; The Boston Consulting Group: Boston, MA, USA, 2007.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Birchall, D.; Chanaron, J.; Tovstiga, G.; Hillenbrand, C. Innovation performance measurement: Current practices, issues and management challenges. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2011, 56, 1â20. [CrossRef]
- Boston Consulting Group for the World Economic Forum (2017). Shaping the Future of Construction Inspiring innovators Redefine the Industry. Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_Construction_Inspiring_ Innovators_redefine_the_industry_2017.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2020).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brenner, T.; Broekel, T. Methodological issues in measuring innovation performance of spatial units. Ind. Innov. 2011, 18, 7â37. [CrossRef]
- Breretona, P.; Kitchenhama, B.A.; Budgenb, D.; Turnera, M.; Khalilc, M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 2007, 80, 571â583. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brogi, S.; Menichini, T. Do the ISO 14001 Environmental management systems influence eco-innovation performance? Evidences from the EU context. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 8, 292â303. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Calantone, R.J.; Harmancioglu, N.; Droge, C. Inconclusive innovation âReturnsâ: A meta-analysis of research on innovation in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2010, 27, 1065â1081. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cao, D.P.; Li, H.; Wang, G.B.; Luo, X.C.; Yang, X.C.; Tan, D. Dynamics of project-based collaborative networks for BIM implementation: Analysis based on stochastic actor-oriented models. J. Manag. Eng. 2017, 33, 04016055. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carrillo, M. Measuring and ranking R&D performance at the country level. Econ. Sociol. 2019, 12, 100â114. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carter, N.; Bryant-Lukosius, D.; DiCenso, A.; Blythe, J.; Neville, A.J. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2014, 41, 545â547. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chen, F.; Zhao, T.; Liao, Z. The impact of technology-environmental innovation on CO2 emissions in Chinaâs transportation sector. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 29485â29501. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chen, J.; Damanpour, F.; Reilly, R.R. Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: A meta-analysis. J. Oper. Manag. 2010, 28, 17â33. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chen, T.; Huang, G.Q.; Olanipekun, A.O. Simulating the evolution mechanism of inner innovation in large-scale construction enterprise with an improved NK model. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4221. [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C.C.J.; Huizingh, E.K.R.E. When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2014, 31, 1235â1253. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chobotová, M.; Rylková, Ž. Measurement of innovation performance. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Eng. 2014, 8, 2085â2090.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Collison, C. Knowledge Management; Computer Press: Brno, Czech Republic, 2005.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Conejar, R.J.; Kim, H.K. A medical decision support system (DSS) for ubiquitous healthcare diagnosis system. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 2014, 8, 237â244.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Crossan, M.M.; Apaydin, M. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. J. Manag. Stud. 2010, 47, 1154â1191. [CrossRef]
- Cruz-Cázares, C.; Bayona-Sáez, C.; GarcÃa-Marco, T. You canât manage right what you canât measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Res. Policy 2013, 42, 1239â1250. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- de Jong, M.; Marston, N.; Roth, E.; van Biljon, P. The Eight Essentials of Innovation Performance; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dijk, D.V.; Schodl, M.M. Performance Appraisal and Evaluation. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Wright, J., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 716â721.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dixon-Woods, M.; Agarwal, S.; Jones, D.; Young, B.; Sutton, A. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 2005, 10, 45â53. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dziallas, M.; Blind, K. Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation 2019, 80, 3â29. [CrossRef]
- Edwards, W. How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1977, 7, 326â340. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission. Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/s/pBoz (accessed on 11 August 2021).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fitriani, N.; Suzanti, I.O.; Jauhari, A.; Khozaimi, A. Application monitoring and evaluation using SMART (Simple Multi attribute Rating Technique) Method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1569, 022090. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Garcia-Granero, E.M.; Piedra-Munoz, L.; Galdeano-Gomez, E. Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 191, 304â317. [CrossRef]
- Gates, S. Review of methodology of quantitative reviews using meta-analysis in ecology. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71, 547â557. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gaulta, F. Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 617â622. [CrossRef]
- Ghazinoory, S.; Riahi, P.; Azar, A.; Miremadi, T. Measuring innovation performance of developing regions: Learning and catch-up in provinces of Iran. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2014, 20, 507â533. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gomersall, J.S.; Jadotte, Y.T.; Xue, Y.F.; Lockwood, S.; Riddle, D.; Preda, A. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015, 13, 170â178. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Grigoroudis, E.; Orfanoudaki, E.; Zopounidis, C. Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard. Omega 2012, 40, 104â119. [CrossRef]
Grillitsch, M.; Schubert, T.; Srholec, M. Knowledge base combinations and firm growth. Res. Policy 2019, 48, 234â247. [CrossRef]
- Hamel, G.; Green, B. The Future of Management; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2007.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hartmann, T.; Levitt, R.E. Understanding and managing three-dimensional/four-dimensional model implementations at the project team level. ASCE J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2010, 136, 757â767. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Henttonen, K.; Ojanen, V.; Puumalainen, K. Searching for appropriate performance measures for innovation and development projects. R&D Manag. 2016, 46, 914â927.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hong, J.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Z. The effect of supply chain quality management practices and capabilities on operational and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 212, 227â235. [CrossRef]
Kabanoff, B.; Brown, S. Knowledge structures of prospectors, analyzers and defenders: Content, structure, stability and performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2008, 29, 149â171. [CrossRef]
- Kasie, F.M. Combining simple multiple attribute rating technique and analytical hierarchy process for designing multi-criteria performance measurement framework. Glob. J. Res. Eng. 2013, 13, 15â29.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kim, D.G.; Choi, S.O. Impact of construction it technology convergence innovation on business performance. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3972. [CrossRef]
- Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, O.P. A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2013, 55, 2049â2075. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, O.P.; Budgen, D.; Turner, M.; Bailey, J.; Linkman, S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineeringâA systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2009, 51, 7â15. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kompalla, A.; Buchmuller, M.; Heinemann, B.; Kopia, J. Performance measurement of management system standards using the balanced scorecard. Amfiteatru Econ. 2017, 19, 981â1002.
- Kunz, J.; Fischer, M. Virtual Design and Construction: Themes, Case Studies and Implementation Suggestions; CIFE Working Paper #097; Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2012.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lai, X.D.; Liu, J.X.; Georgiev, G. Low carbon technology integration innovation assessment index review based on rough set theoryâAn evidence from construction industry in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 126, 88â96. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lame, G. Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, 5â8 August 2019. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Le, Y.; Wan, J.Y.; Wang, G.; Bai, J.; Zhang, B. Exploring the missing link between top management team characteristics and megaproject performance. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2020, 27, 1039â1064.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Li, Y.F.; Song, Y.; Wang, J.X.; Li, C.W. Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation performance: Evidence from the Chinese construction industry. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2713. [CrossRef]
- Lo, S.M.; Lam, K.C.; Fang, Z. An Investigation on the building officialsâ perception for the use of performance based fire engineering approach in building design. Fire Technol. 2002, 38, 271â286. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mandujano, M.G.; Mourgues, C.; Alarcon, L.F.; Kunz, J. Modeling virtual design and construction implementation strategies considering lean management impacts. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2017, 32, 930â951. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Manoochehri, G. Measuring innovation: Challenges and best practices. Calif. J. Oper. Manag. 2010, 8, 67â73.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mazur, K.; Inkow, M. Methodological aspects of innovation performance measurement in the IT sector. Management 2017, 21, 14â27. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McKinsey Report 2016. Imagining Constructionâs Digital Future. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/businessfunctions /operations/our-insights/imagining-constructions-digital-future (accessed on 10 May 2021).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mehta, S. National innovation system of India: An empirical analysis. Millenn. Asia 2018, 9, 203â224. [CrossRef]
Meijer, P.C.; Verloop, N.; Beijaard, D. Multi-Method triangulation in a qualitative study on teachersâ practical knowledge: An attempt to increase internal validity. Qual. Quant. 2002, 36, 145â167. [CrossRef]
Moagar-Poladian, S.; Folea, V.; Paunica, M. Competitiveness of EU member states in attracting EU funding for research and innovation. Rom. J. Econ. Forecast. 2017, 20, 150â167.
- Nankervis, A.R.; Compton, R. Performance management: Theory in practice? Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2006, 44, 83â101. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nasrallah, W.; Levitt, R.; Glynn, P. Interaction value analysis: When structured communication benefits organizations. Organ. Sci. 2003, 14, 541â557. [CrossRef]
- National Civic Art Society. Americansâ Preferred Architecture for Federal Buildings. 2020. Available online: https: //static1.squarespace.com/static/59bfe5dbf14aa1b6bbb12cd0/t/5f845dfda65e566a0e0a8d32/1602510358640/Americans%27 -Preferred-Architecture-for-Federal-Buildings-National-Civic-Art-Society-Harris-Poll-Survey.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2021).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- National Endowments for the Arts. 2007 Annual Report. Available online: https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/AR2007.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2021).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nazim, A.S.; Young, H.C.; Ali, N.M. Determining the quality of publications and research for tenure or promotion decisions. Libr. Rev. 1996, 45, 39â53. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Neely, A.; Hii, J. Innovation and Business Performance: A Literature Review; Report for the Judge Institute of Management Studies; University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 1998.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Noktehdan, M.; Shahbazpour, M.; Wilkinson, S. Driving innovative thinking in the New Zealand construction industry. Buildings 2015, 5, 297â309. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 9038 27 of 27
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nwachukwu, C.; Chladkova, H.; Fadeyi, O. Strategy formulation process and innovation performance nexus. Int. J. Qual. Res. 2018, 12, 147â164.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ocnarescu, I.; Bouchard, C. Memorable projects and aesthetic experiences in an industrial R&D lab. Soc. Bus. Rev. 2017, 12, 285â301.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Okoli, C.; Schabram, K. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems Research. Sprouts Work. Pap. Inf. Syst. 2010, 10. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Olson, D.L. Smart. In Decision Aids for Selection Problems; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 34â48.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ozorhon, B. Analysis of construction innovation process at project level. J. Manag. Eng. 2013, 29, 455â463. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Patton, M.Q. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR 1999, 34, 1189â1208.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Piro, F.N. The R&D composition of European countries: Concentrated versus dispersed profiles. Scientometrics 2019, 119, 1095â1119.
Plewa, M. Long-Run dynamics between product life cycle length and innovation performance in Manufacturing. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2017, 21, 1750006. [CrossRef]
- Popadic, I.; Borocki, J.; Radisic, M.; Stefanic, I.; Duspara, L. The challenges while measuring enterprise innovative activitiesâthe case from a developing country. Teh. Vjesn. Tech. Gaz. 2018, 25, 452â459.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Popova, V.; Sharpanskykh, A. Modeling organizational performance indicators. Inf. Syst. 2010, 35, 505â527. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Purssell, E.; McCrae, N. How to Perform a Systematic Literature Review; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; ISBN 978-3-030-49671-5.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Risawandi, R.R. Study of the simple multi-attribute rating technique for decision support. Decis. Mak. 2016, 4, C4.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Risjord, M.W.; Dunbar, S.B.; Moloney, M.F. A new foundation for methodological triangulation. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2002, 34, 269â275. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Roszko-Wójtowicz, E.; BiaÅek, J. A multivariate approach in measuring innovation Performance. J. Econ. Bus. 2016, 34, 443â479. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schwartz, L.; Miller, R.; Plummer, D.; Fusfeld, A.R. Measuring the effectiveness of R&D. Res. Technol. Manag. 2011, 54, 29â36.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Serrano-Bedia, A.M.; López-Fernández, M.C.; GarcÃa-Piqueres, G. Complementarity between innovation knowledge sources: Does the innovation performance measure matter? Bus. Res. Q. 2018, 21, 53â67. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I.; Streimikiene, D.; Balezentis, T.; Skulskis, V. A systematic literature review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for sustainable selection of insulation materials in buildings. Sustainability 2021, 13, 737. [CrossRef]
- Silva, J.J.; Cirani, C.B.S. The capability of organizational innovation: Systematic review of literature and research proposals. Gestão Produção. 2020, 27, e4819. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Subramanian, A.; Nilakanta, S. Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega 1996, 24, 631â647. [CrossRef]
Svandova, E.; Jirásek, M. On measuring countriesâ innovation performance: Organisational level perspective. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2019, 67, 871â881. [CrossRef]
- Taques, F.H.; López, M.G.; Basso, L.F.; Areal, N. Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. J. Innov. Knowl. 2021, 6, 11â26. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Taylor, J.E.; Levitt, R.E. Understanding and Managing Systemic Innovation in Project-Based Industries; Global Projects Center, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2004; Available online: https://gpc.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/taylorlevitt2004_0.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2021).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Taylor, J.M., Jr.; Love, B.N. Simple multi-attribute rating technique for renewable energy deployment decisions (SMART REDD). J. Def. Model. Simul. 2014, 11, 227â232. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The KPI Working Group. KPI Report for the Minister for Construction; Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: London, UK, 2000.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The Next Normal in Construction; McKinsey Report 2020; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~{}/media/McKinsey/Industries/Capital%20Projects%20and%20Infrastructure/Our%20 Insights/The%20next%20normal%20in%20construction/The-next-normal-in-construction.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2021).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tushman, M.; Nadler, D. Organizing for Innovation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1986, 28, 74â92. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 9038 24 of 27
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Walker, R.M.; Chen, J.Y.; Aravind, D. Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings. Eur. Manag. J. 2015, 33, 407â422. [CrossRef]
Wang, Q.; Zhao, L.W.; Chang-Richards, A.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Li, H.J. Understanding the impact of social capital on the innovation performance of construction enterprises: Based on the mediating effect of knowledge transfer. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5099. [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.H.; Miraglia, S. Organizational culture and knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: Theoretical insights from a Chinese construction organization. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 571â585. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Werner, B.M.; Souder, W.E. Measuring R&D performanceâState of the art. Res. Technol. Manag. 1997, 38, 22â39.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Woudhuysen, J.; Abley, I. Why Is Construction So Backward? Wiley Academy: Chichester, UK, 2004.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Xiao, Y.; Watson, M. Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2019, 39, 93â112. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Xue, X.L.; Zhang, R.X.; Wang, L.; Fan, H.Q.; Yang, R.J.; Dai, J. Collaborative in-novation in construction project: A social network perspective. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2018, 22, 417â427. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Yu, A.Y.; Shi, Y.; You, J.X.; Zhu, J. Innovation performance evaluation for high-tech companies using a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2021, 292, 199â212. [CrossRef]
- Zawawi, N.F.M.; Wahab, S.A.; Al-Mamun, A.; Yaacob, A.S.; NKSamy Fazal, S.A. Defining the concept of innovation and firm innovativeness: A critical analysis from resource-based view perspective. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2016, 11, 87â94. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zheng, J.W.; Wu, G.D.; Xie, H.T. Impacts of leadership on project-based organizational innovation performance: The mediator of knowledge sharing and moderator of social capital. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1893. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 9038 25 of 27