create a website

Corporate Social Responsibility and Pro-Environmental Behavior of the Individuals from the Perspective of Protection Motivation Theory. (2021). Siddique, Irfan ; Yang, Guangqin ; Jilani, Ghulam.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13406-:d:694450.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 110

References cited by this document

Cocites: 18

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Stakeholder perceptions of sustainability and possible behaviour in a biosphere reserve. (2023). Botha, Elricke.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:5:p:3843-3856.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Examining the Impact of Issue Salience, Issue Proximity, Situational Motivation, and Communicative Behaviors on Environmental CSR Outcomes. (2022). Bhalla, Nandini.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2763-:d:759462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Afsar, B.; Al-Ghazali, B.; Umrani, W. Retracted: Corporate social responsibility, work meaningfulness, and employee engagement: The joint moderating effects of incremental moral belief and moral identity centrality. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 1264–1278. [CrossRef]

  2. Afsar, B.; Al-Ghazali, B.M.; Rehman, Z.U.; Umrani, W.A. Retracted: The moderating effects of employee corporate social responsibility motive attributions (substantive and symbolic) between corporate social responsibility perceptions and voluntary pro-environmental behavior. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 769–785. [CrossRef]

  3. Afsar, B.; Umrani, W.A. Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 109–125. [CrossRef]

  4. Ahmad, N.; Naveed, R.T.; Scholz, M.; Irfan, M.; Usman, M.; Ahmad, I. CSR communication through social media: A litmus test for banking consumers’ loyalty. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2319. [CrossRef]

  5. Ahmad, N.; Ullah, Z.; Arshad, M.Z.; waqas Kamran, H.; Scholz, M.; Han, H. Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1138–1148. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Ahmad, N.; Ullah, Z.; Mahmood, A.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Vega-Muñoz, A.; Han, H.; Scholz, M. Corporate social responsibility at the micro-level as a “new organizational value” for sustainability: Are females more aligned towards it? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2165. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Akhtar, S.; Khan, K.U.; Atlas, F.; Irfan, M. Stimulating student’s pro-environmental behavior in higher education institutions: An ability–motivation–opportunity perspective. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 1–22. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Al-Ghazali, B.M.; Afsar, B. Retracted: Green human resource management and employees’ green creativity: The roles of green behavioral intention and individual green values. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2021, 28, 536. [CrossRef]

  9. Amelang, M.; Tepe, K.; Vagt, G.; Wendt, W. A note on the development of an ecology scale. Diagnostica 1977, 23, 86–88. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13406 19 of 20
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Anderson, D.J.; Krettenauer, T. Connectedness to Nature and Pro-Environmental Behaviour from Early Adolescence to Adulthood: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Canada. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3655. [CrossRef]

  11. Bakht, R. Emerging Trends and Challenges to Higher Education in Pakistan. Available online: https://www.thenews.com.pk/ print/833031-emerging-trends-and-challenges-to-higher-education-in-pakistan (accessed on 2 August 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Balundė, A.; Perlaviciute, G.; Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I. Sustainability in Youth: Environmental Considerations in Adolescence and Their Relationship to Pro-environmental Behavior. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 2985. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Bhattacharyya, A.; Biswas, K.; Moyeen, A. Determinants of Pro-environmental Behaviours–A Cross Country Study of Would-be Managers. Australas. Account. Bus. Financ. J. 2020, 14, 51–71. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Binsawad, M.H. Corporate social responsibility in higher education: A PLS-SEM neural network approach. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 29125–29131. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Bissing-Olson, M.J.; Iyer, A.; Fielding, K.S.; Zacher, H. Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. J. Organ. Behav. 2013, 34, 156–175. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Bockarjova, M.; Steg, L. Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 28, 276–288. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Bozkurt, S.; Bal, Y. Investigation of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and organizational citizenship behavior: A research. Int. J. Innov. Bus. 2012, 1, 40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Carlini, J.; Grace, D. The corporate social responsibility (CSR) internal branding model: Aligning employees’ CSR awareness, knowledge, and experience to deliver positive employee performance outcomes. J. Mark. Manag. 2021, 37, 732–760. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Castro-González, S.; Vilela, B.B. The influence of emotions on the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and consumer loyalty. ESIC Market. Econ. Bus. J. 2016, 47, 373–396. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Cavaco, S.; Crifo, P. CSR and financial performance: Complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours. Appl. Econ. 2014, 46, 3323–3338. [CrossRef]

  21. Chan, T.J.; Mohd Hasan, N. Corporate social responsibility practices from the employees’ perspective: A case of Malaysian higher education institution. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2018, 8, 131–153. [CrossRef]

  22. Chang, S.-J.; Van Witteloostuijn, A.; Eden, L. From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2010, 41, 178–184. [CrossRef]

  23. Cismaru, M.; Cismaru, R.; Ono, T.; Nelson, K. “Act on climate change”: An application of protection motivation theory. Soc. Mark. Q. 2011, 17, 62–84. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. D’Acunto, D.; Tuan, A.; Dalli, D.; Viglia, G.; Okumus, F. Do consumers care about CSR in their online reviews? An empirical analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 85, 102342. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Dahan, G.S.; Senol, I. Corporate social responsibility in higher education institutions: Istanbul Bilgi University case. Am. Int. J. Cont. Res. 2012, 2, 95–103.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. De Leeuw, A.; Valois, P.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 42, 128–138. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Declaration, H. Human experimentation: Code of ethics of World Medical Association Br. Br. Med. J. 1964, 2, 18. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13406 20 of 20
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. DeVille, N.V.; Tomasso, L.P.; Stoddard, O.P.; Wilt, G.E.; Horton, T.H.; Wolf, K.L.; Brymer, E.; Kahn, P.H.; James, P. Time Spent in Nature Is Associated with Increased Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7498. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Droms Hatch, C.; Stephen, S.-A. Gender effects on perceptions of individual and corporate social responsibility. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. 2015, 17, 63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. EPI. Environmental Health. Available online: https://epi.yale.edu/epi-results/2020/component/hlt (accessed on 19 July 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Faustini, P. The Challenges of Climate Change: Children on the Front Line; UNICEF: Italy, Florence, 2014.

  32. Fernández-Gómez, E.; Martín-Salvador, A.; Luque-Vara, T.; Sánchez-Ojeda, M.A.; Navarro-Prado, S.; Enrique-Mirón, C. Content validation through expert judgement of an instrument on the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits of pregnant women. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1136. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Fu, H.; Ye, B.H.; Law, R. You do well and I do well? The behavioral consequences of corporate social responsibility. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 40, 62–70. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Galvão, A.; Mendes, L.; Marques, C.; Mascarenhas, C. Factors influencing students’ corporate social responsibility orientation in higher education. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 215, 290–304. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Gefen, D.; Straub, D.; Boudreau, M.-C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2000, 4, 7. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Geiger, S.M.; Geiger, M.; Wilhelm, O. Environment-specific vs. general knowledge and their role in pro-environmental behavior. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 718. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Gholamrezai, S.; Aliabadi, V.; Ataei, P. Understanding the pro-environmental behavior among green poultry farmers: Application of behavioral theories. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 16100–16118. [CrossRef]

  39. Gifford, R.; Nilsson, A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. Int. J. Psychol. 2014, 49, 141–157. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Gjersing, L.; Caplehorn, J.R.; Clausen, T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2010, 10, 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Gkorezis, P.; Petridou, E. Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behaviour: Organisational identification as a mediator. Eur. J. Int. Manag. 2017, 11, 1–18. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Gouldner, A.W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1960, 25, 161–178. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Guo, M.; Ahmad, N.; Adnan, M.; Scholz, M.; Naveed, R.T. The relationship of csr and employee creativity in the hotel sector: The mediating role of job autonomy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10032. [CrossRef]

  44. Harman, H.H. Modern Factor Analysis; University of Chicago press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1976.

  45. Horng, J.-S.; Hu, M.-L.M.; Teng, C.-C.C.; Lin, L. Energy saving and carbon reduction behaviors in tourism–a perception study of Asian visitors from a protection motivation theory perspective. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2014, 19, 721–735. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Huang, C.-F.; Lien, H.-C. An empirical analysis of the influences of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance of Taiwan’s construction industry: Using corporate image as a mediator. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2012, 30, 263–275. [CrossRef]

  47. Hur, W.-M.; Moon, T.-W.; Choi, W.-H. The role of job crafting and perceived organizational support in the link between employees’ CSR perceptions and job performance: A moderated mediation model. Curr. Psychol. 2021, 40, 3151–3165. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. IQAir. Air Quality in Pakistan. Available online: https://www.iqair.com/us/pakistan (accessed on 9 May 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Islam, M.; Managi, S. Green growth and pro-environmental behavior: Sustainable resource management using natural capital accounting in India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 145, 126–138. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Islam, T.; Ali, G.; Asad, H. Environmental CSR and pro-environmental behaviors to reduce environmental dilapidation. Manag. Res. Rev. 2019, 42, 332–351. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Ito, K.; Leung, A.K.-y.; Huang, T. Why do cosmopolitan individuals tend to be more pro-environmentally committed? The mediating pathways via knowledge acquisition and emotional affinity toward nature. J. Environ. Psychol. 2020, 68, 101395. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Janmaimool, P. Application of protection motivation theory to investigate sustainable waste management behaviors. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1079. [CrossRef]

  53. Jelinkova, M.; Tetrevova, L.; Vavra, J.; Munzarova, S. The Sharing Economy in the Context of Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility: The Example of the Czech Republic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9886. [CrossRef]

  54. Jung, Y.; Park, K.; Ahn, J. Sustainability in higher education: Perceptions of social responsibility among university students. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 90. [CrossRef]

  55. Kals, E.; Maes, J. Sustainable development and emotions. In Psychology of Sustainable Development; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 97–122.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Kals, E.; Schumacher, D.; Montada, L. Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environ. Behav. 1999, 31, 178–202. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Kerret, D.; Orkibi, H.; Bukchin, S.; Ronen, T. Two for one: Achieving both pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being by implementing environmental-hope-enhancing programs in schools. J. Environ. Educ. 2020, 51, 434–448. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Keshavarz, M.; Karami, E. Farmers’ pro-environmental behavior under drought: Application of protection motivation theory. J. Arid. Environ. 2016, 127, 128–136. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Khan, H.A.; Zahoor, A.; Irum, S. Impacts of corporate social responsibility on employees behavior in telecom sector of Pakistan. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2014, 6, 34–43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Kollmuss, A.; Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 2002, 8, 239–260. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 13406 17 of 20
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Kong, L.; Sial, M.S.; Ahmad, N.; Sehleanu, M.; Li, Z.; Zia-Ud-Din, M.; Badulescu, D. CSR as a potential motivator to shape employees’ view towards nature for a sustainable workplace environment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1499. [CrossRef]

  62. Kothe, E.J.; Ling, M.; North, M.; Klas, A.; Mullan, B.A.; Novoradovskaya, L. Protection motivation theory and pro-environmental behaviour: A systematic mapping review. Aust. J. Psychol. 2019, 71, 411–432. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Krettenauer, T. Pro-environmental behavior and adolescent moral development. J. Res. Adolesc. 2017, 27, 581–593. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Li, D.; Zhao, L.; Ma, S.; Shao, S.; Zhang, L. What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 146, 28–34. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Lyons, E.; Breakwell, G.M. Factors predicting environmental concern and indifference in 13-to 16-year-olds. Environ. Behav. 1994, 26, 223–238. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Müller, M.M.; Kals, E.; Pansa, R. Adolescents’ emotional affinity toward nature: A cross-societal study. J. Dev. Process. 2009, 4, 59–69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Maddux, J.E.; Rogers, R.W. Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1983, 19, 469–479. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Misani, N. The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices. Manag. Res. Rev. 2010, 33, 734–748. [CrossRef]

  69. MOF. Education. Available online: https://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/chapters_19/10-Education.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Molinario, E.; Lorenzi, C.; Bartoccioni, F.; Perucchini, P.; Bobeth, S.; Colléony, A.; Diniz, R.; Eklund, A.; Jaeger, C.; Kibbe, A. From childhood nature experiences to adult pro-environmental behaviors: An explanatory model of sustainable food consumption. Environ. Educ. Res. 2020, 26, 1137–1163. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Mosca, F.; Civera, C. The evolution of CSR: An integrated approach. Symphonya. Emerg. Issues Manag. 2017, 1, 16–35. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Murtaza, S.A.; Mahmood, A.; Saleem, S.; Ahmad, N.; Sharif, M.S.; Molnár, E. Proposing Stewardship Theory as an Alternate to Explain the Relationship between CSR and Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behavior. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8558. [CrossRef]

  73. Nejati, M.; Nejati, M. Assessment of sustainable university factors from the perspective of university students. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 48, 101–107. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Norton, T.A.; Zacher, H.; Ashkanasy, N.M. Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014, 38, 49–54. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Onkila, T. Pride or embarrassment? Employees’ emotions and corporate social responsibility. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2015, 22, 222–236. [CrossRef]

  76. Park, J.; Ha, S. Understanding pro-environmental behavior. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2012, 40, 388–403. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Petrenko, O.V.; Aime, F.; Ridge, J.; Hill, A. Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2016, 37, 262–279. [CrossRef]

  78. Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manag. 1986, 12, 531–544. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Prentice-Dunn, S.; Rogers, R.W. Protection motivation theory and preventive health: Beyond the health belief model. Health Educ. Res. 1986, 1, 153–161. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Rahman, A.A.; Castka, P.; Love, T. Corporate social responsibility in higher education: A study of the institutionalisation of CSR in Malaysian public universities. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 916–928. [CrossRef]

  81. Raza, A.; Farrukh, M.; Iqbal, M.K.; Farhan, M.; Wu, Y. Corporate social responsibility and employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior: The role of organizational pride and employee engagement. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2021, 28, 1104–1116. [CrossRef]

  82. Rees, J.H.; Klug, S.; Bamberg, S. Guilty conscience: Motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Clim. Chang. 2015, 130, 439–452. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Rhou, Y.; Singal, M.; Koh, Y. CSR and financial performance: The role of CSR awareness in the restaurant industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 57, 30–39. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 13406 18 of 20
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Robert, H. Education in Pakistan. Available online: https://wenr.wes.org/2020/02/education-in-pakistan (accessed on 1 August 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Robertson, J.L.; Barling, J. Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 2013, 34, 176–194. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Rogers, R.W. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. J. Psychol. 1975, 91, 93–114. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Rogers, R.W.; Prentice-Dunn, S. Protection motivation theory. In Handbook of Health Behavior Research 1: Personal and Social Determinants; Gochman, D.S., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 113–132.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Rosa, C.D.; Profice, C.C.; Collado, S. Nature experiences and adults’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 1055. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Russell, S.; Griffiths, A. Chapter 4 the role of emotions in driving workplace pro-environmental behaviors. In Emotions, Ethics and Decision-Making; Zerbe, W.J., Härtel, C.E.J., Ashkanasy, N.M., Eds.; Research on Emotion in Organizations; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2008; Volume 4, pp. 83–107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Schultz, P. Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. J. Soc. Issues+ 2000, 56, 391–406. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Seebauer, S.; Fleiß, J.; Schweighart, M. A household is not a person: Consistency of pro-environmental behavior in adult couples and the accuracy of proxy-reports. Environ. Behav. 2017, 49, 603–637. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Shafiei, A.; Maleksaeidi, H. Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 22, e00908. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Shah, S.H.A.; Cheema, S.; Al-Ghazali, B.M.; Ali, M.; Rafiq, N. Perceived corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behaviors: The role of organizational identification and coworker pro-environmental advocacy. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2021, 28, 366–377. [CrossRef]

  94. Shakil, S. Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Pakistan. In Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Sonetti, G.; Brown, M.; Naboni, E. About the triggering of UN sustainable development goals and regenerative sustainability in higher education. Sustainability 2019, 11, 254. [CrossRef]

  96. Suganthi, L. Examining the relationship between corporate social responsibility, performance, employees’ pro-environmental behavior at work with green practices as mediator. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 739–750. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Tezel, E.; Ugural, M.; Giritli, H. Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Influence of cultural differences. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 7, 43. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Tian, Q.; Robertson, J.L. How and when does perceived CSR affect employees’ engagement in voluntary pro-environmental behavior? J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 155, 399–412. [CrossRef]

  99. Turker, D. Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. J. Bus. Ethics 2009, 85, 411–427. [CrossRef]

  100. UNEP. Emissions Gap Report 2021. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2021?utm_term= emissions%20gap&utm_campaign=Search_Global_Climate_Action&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=19 70971754&hsa_cam=15139102696&hsa_grp=128680613505&hsa_ad=558137628912&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-146185346513 2&hsa_kw=emissions%20gap&hsa_mt=p&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=CjwKCAiAm7OMBhAQEiwArvGi3Ca-5perNWFqNqNKMz0apSnSHs36zHMmMdyP900ctlKqOD0C27 -exoCANMQAvD_BwE (accessed on 2 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. United Nations. World Population Prospects 2019. Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/Graphs/Probabilistic/ POP/TOT/586 (accessed on 1 August 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Vázquez, J.L.; Lanero, A.; Licandro, O. Corporate social responsibility and higher education: Uruguay university students’ perceptions1. Econ. Sociol. 2013, 6, 145. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Walder, P.; Kantelhardt, J. The environmental behaviour of farmers–capturing the diversity of perspectives with a Q methodological approach. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 143, 55–63. [CrossRef]

  104. Wang, Y.; Liang, J.; Yang, J.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Wu, J.; Yang, G.; Ren, G.; Feng, Y. Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 237, 15–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  105. Warrick, B.L. Examining Employee Motivation, Environmental Systems, and Corporate Social Responsibility in Proenvironmental Behavior. Ph.D. Thesis, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Wells, V.K.; Manika, D.; Gregory-Smith, D.; Taheri, B.; McCowlen, C. Heritage tourism, CSR and the role of employee environmental behaviour. Tour. Manag. 2015, 48, 399–413. [CrossRef]

  107. Worldometer. Pakistan Population. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/pakistan-population/ (accessed on 2 August 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  108. Xie, H.-B.; Wu, W.-J.; Wang, Y.-F. Life-time reliability based optimization of bridge maintenance strategy considering LCA and LCC. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 176, 36–45. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Zelenski, J.M.; Desrochers, J.E. Can positive and self-transcendent emotions promote pro-environmental behavior? Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2021, 42, 31–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  110. Zheng, S.; Cheng, Y.; Ju, Y. Understanding the intention and behavior of renting houses among the young generation: Evidence from Jinan, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1507. [CrossRef]

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Identifying employee engagement drivers using multilayer perceptron classifier and sensitivity analysis. (2024). Mercad-Mel, Pere ; Molina-Gmez, Jess ; Nez-Snchez, Jos M ; Fernndez-Migulez, Sergio M.
    In: Eurasian Business Review.
    RePEc:spr:eurasi:v:14:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40821-024-00283-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Bridging Generative Leadership and Green Creativity: Unpacking the Role of Psychological Green Climate and Green Commitment in the Hospitality Industry. (2023). Khan, Wajid ; Zaheer, Sania ; Afridi, Sajjad Ahmad ; Shahjehan, Asad ; Gohar, Ali.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231185759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Carrot or Stick? CSR and Firm Financial Performance. (2023). Yasir, Latif ; Ma, Chen.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:188:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05336-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: Is it a matter of perceptions?. (2022). Iandolo, Francesca ; Singh, Sanjay Kumar ; Alhmoudi, Ranya Saeed ; Caputo, Francesco ; Riso, Teresa.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:6:p:2030-2037.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The influence of corporate social responsibilities on sustainable financial performance: Mediating role of shared vision capabilities and moderating role of entrepreneurship. (2022). Luo, Wenbo ; Li, Minxin ; Zhang, Chuan.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1266-1282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Are all CSR Activities in Your SNS Authentic? The Antecedents and Outcomes of Consumer Perceived Authenticity of CSR. (2022). Kim, Yeonggil ; Wang, Chen.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221139453.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Linking Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility with Green Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Shared Vision Capability and the Moderating Role of Resource Slack. (2022). Zhu, Zuping ; Chen, Wan ; Ruan, Rongbin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16943-:d:1006473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. No Place for Pointless Jobs: How Social Responsibility Impacts Job Performance. (2022). Esteves, Teresa ; Gonalves, Sonia P ; Scholten, Marc ; Correia, Manuela Faia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12031-:d:922942.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. (2022). Cao, Xueyun ; Yuan, Baolong.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Drivers of employees proactiveness for sustainability embeddedness: Examining situation‐related antecedents of information exchange. (2022). Todaro, Niccolo Maria ; Gusmerotti, Natalia Marzia ; Testa, Francesco.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:1919-1937.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Framing the evolution of the corporate social responsibility and environmental management journal. (2021). Farrukh, Muhammad ; Wu, Yihua ; Alam, Imtiaz ; Meng, Fanchen ; Raza, Ali.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:4:p:1397-1411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The impact of corporate social responsibility on innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The mediating role of debt terms and human capital. (2021). Santosjaen, Jose Manuel ; Garciaperezdelema, Domingo ; Madridguijarro, Antonia.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:4:p:1200-1215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Corporate social responsibility and employees voluntary pro‐environmental behavior: The role of organizational pride and employee engagement. (2021). Farrukh, Muhammad ; Wu, Yihua ; Iqbal, Muhammad Khalid ; Farhan, Muhammad ; Raza, Ali.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:1104-1116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Being sustainable: The three‐way interactive effects of CSR, green human resource management, and responsible leadership on employee green behavior and task performance. (2021). He, Jie ; Zhang, Hao ; Morrison, Alastair M.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:1043-1054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Green human resource management and employees pro‐environmental behaviours: Examining the underlying mechanism. (2021). Farrukh, Muhammad ; Ansari, Nabeel Younus ; Raza, Ali.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:1:p:229-238.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. CSR as a Potential Motivator to Shape Employees’ View towards Nature for a Sustainable Workplace Environment. (2021). Badulescu, Daniel ; Li, Zhihui ; Ahmad, Naveed ; Sial, Muhammad Safdar ; Sehleanu, Mariana ; Zia-Ud, Malik ; Kong, Linghui.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1499-:d:490838.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Corporate Social Responsibility and Pro-Environmental Behavior of the Individuals from the Perspective of Protection Motivation Theory. (2021). Siddique, Irfan ; Yang, Guangqin ; Jilani, Ghulam.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13406-:d:694450.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Moral Awareness: A Source of Improved Sustainable Performance. (2021). Iqbal, Zafar ; Hoshino, Yasuo ; Hussain, Mujahid ; Hassan, Hamid ; Niazi, Amna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13077-:d:688167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 03:28:07 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.