1. Towards a Concept for a Multifunctional Mobility Hub: Combining Multimodal Services, Urban Logistics, and Energy. (2025). Fahlbusch, Jonas ; Fischer, Felix ; Gegner, Martin ; Grahle, Alexander ; Tasche, Lars.
   In: Logistics.
   RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:92-:d:1699076.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. How deep is your trust? A comparative user requirements’ analysis of automation in medical and mobility technologies. (2024). Hick, Sophia ; Ziefle, Martina ; Biermann, Hannah.
   In: Palgrave Communications.
   RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02575-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. IMPReSS: A comprehensive method to classify MaaS systems. (2024). Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio ; Moura, Filipe ; Vale, David ; Lopes, Andre Soares.
   In: Transport Policy.
   RePEc:eee:trapol:v:155:y:2024:i:c:p:234-241.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Traveling itinerary problem in a scheduled multimodal transportation network for a fixed sequence of cities. (2023). Ali, Rafaqat ; Jiang, Hai ; Buzna, Lubos.
   In: PLOS ONE.
   RePEc:plo:pone00:0287604.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition. (2023). Tammaru, Tiit ; Witlox, Frank ; Sevtsuk, Andres.
   In: Journal of Transport Geography.
   RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:112:y:2023:i:c:s0966692323001588.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Towards a typology of mobility hubs. (2023). Mingardo, Giuliano ; Weustenenk, Anne Gerda.
   In: Journal of Transport Geography.
   RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:106:y:2023:i:c:s096669232200237x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. A Framework to Facilitate Advanced Mixed Methods Studies for Investigating Interventions in Road Space for Cycling. (2022). Loidl, Martin ; Riess, Jannik ; Kratochwil, Florian ; Fussl, Elisabeth ; Werner, Christian ; Resch, Bernd.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:622-:d:1019574.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Driving Forces and Barriers for the Implementation of Mobility Services in Austria—A Practitioner Perspective. (2022). Batiajew, Valerie ; Juschten, Maria ; Schabka, Marc ; Kammerhofer, Aurelia.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11431-:d:912934.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Reflections on Sustainable Urban Mobility, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and Adoption Models. (2022). Periaez-Cristobal, Rafael ; Rey-Moreno, Manuel ; Calvo-Mora, Arturo.
   In: IJERPH.
   RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:274-:d:1013699.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Compromise Multi-Criteria Selection of E-Scooters for the Vehicle Sharing System in Poland. (2022). Ziemba, Pawe ; Gago, Izabela.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5048-:d:860506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Akyelken N.; Banister D.; Givoni M. The sustainability of shared mobility in London: The dilemma for governance. Sustainability 2018, 10.

2. Akyelken N.; Givoni M.; Salo M.; Plepys A.; Judl J.; Anderton K.; Koskela S. The importance of institutions and policy settings for car sharing-evidence from the UK, Israel, Sweden and Finland. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2018, 18, 340-359.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Aono S. Identifying Best Practices for Mobility Hubs; University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2020.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Ballús-Armet I.; Shaheen S.A.; Clonts K.; Weinzimmer D. Peer-to-Peer Carsharing: Exploring Public Perception and Market Characteristics in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2014, 2416, 27-36.

5. Beck M.J.; Hensher D.A. Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on household travel and activities in Australia-The early days under restrictions. Transp. Policy 2020, 96, 76-93.

6. Becker H.; Balac M.; Ciari F.; Axhausen K.W. Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 228-243.

7. Bell D. Intermodal Mobility Hubs and User Needs. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8.

8. Campisi T.; Basbas S.; Skoufas A.; Akgün N.; Ticali D.; Tesoriere G. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Resilience of Sustainable Mobility in Sicily. Sustainability 2020, 12.

9. Cats O.; Susilo Y.O.; Reimal T. The prospects of fare-free public transport: Evidence from Tallinn. Transportation 2017, 44, 1083-1104.

10. Caulfield B.; O’Mahony M.; Brazil W.; Weldon P. Examining usage patterns of a bike-sharing scheme in a medium sized city. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2017, 100, 152-161.

11. Clavel R.; Floriet M. The Increasing Development of Carsharing in France, European Transport Conference, 2009 Association for European Transport (AET), 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Clewlow R.; Mishra G. Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States; Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2017.

13. Coppola P.; Silvestri F. Future mobility and land use scenarios: Impact assessment with an urban case study. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 42, 53-63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Costa P.B.; Morais Neto G.C.; Bertolde A.I. Urban Mobility Indexes: A Brief Review of the Literature. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 25, 3645-3655.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Cottrill C.D. MaaS surveillance: Privacy considerations in mobility as a service. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 50-57.

16. Crescenzi R.; Di Cataldo M.; Rodríguez-Pose A. Government quality and the economic returns of transport infrastructure investment in European regions. J. Reg. Sci. 2016, 56, 555-582.

17. De Vos J. The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020, 5, 100121.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Demaio P. Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. J. Public Transp. 2009, 12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Fischer B. In Uber vs. Taxi Cab Fight, Expense Reports Offer Telling Barometer. 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Forum I.T. Transition to Shared Mobility: How Large Cities Can Deliver Inclusive Transport Services; OECD: Paris, France, 2017.

21. Gallo M.; Marinelli M. Sustainable mobility: A review of possible actions and policies. Sustainability 2020, 12.

22. Giesel F.; Nobis C. The impact of carsharing on car ownership in German cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 19, 215-224.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Gompf K.; Traverso M.; Hetterich J. Towards social life cycle assessment of mobility services: Systematic literature review and the way forward. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020, 25, 1883-1909.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Grignard A.; Alonso L.; Taillandier P.; Gaudou B.; Nguyen-Huu T.; Gruel W.; Larson K. The impact of new mobility modes on a city: A generic approach using abm. International Conference on Complex Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 272-280.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Gu T.; Kim I.; Currie G. To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China. Transp. Res. Part A 2019, 119, 122-147.

26. Gurjar J.; Jain P.; Agarwal P. Comparative Performance Evaluation of Public Transport Services from City Perspective. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 48, 2207-2229.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Hecker M.; Zhou Q.; Wu Z. The Future of Shared Mobility in China. 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Hensher D.A.; Ho C.Q.; Mulley C.; Nelson J.D.; Smith G.; Wong Y.A. Understanding Mobility as a Service (MaaS) Past, Present and Future; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Hietanen S. Mobility as a Service: The New Transport Model. Eurotransport 2014, 12, 2-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Ho C.Q.; Mulley C.; Hensher D.A. Public preferences for mobility as a service: Insights from stated preference surveys. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 70-90.

31. Improving Trade and Transport for Landlocked Developing Countries: A Ten-Year Review; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Jiao J. Shared Mobility. Political Science; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Jittrapirom P.; Caiati V.; Feneri A.-M.; Ebrahimigharehbaghi S.; Alonso González M.J.; Narayan J. Mobility as a Service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Plan. 2017, 2.

34. Kamargianni M.; Li W.; Matyas M.; Schäfer A. A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 3294-3303.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Kamargianni M.; Li W.; Matyas M.; Schäfer A. Towards social life cycle assessment of mobility services: Systematic literature review and the way forward. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 3294-3303.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Karlsson I.; Mukhtar-Landgren D.; Smith G.; Koglin T.; Kronsell A.; Lund E.; Sarasini S.; Sochor J. Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service–A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 283-295.

37. Kilian-Yasin K.; Wöhr M.; Tangour C.; Fournier G. Social acceptance of alternative mobility systems in Tunis. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 19, 135-146.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Koedood J. Future Mobihubs as Social Connector for the Neighbourhood: About Positive Friction, Quantum Mechanics, and your Mother 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Lah O. Sustainable Urban Mobility Pathways: Policies, Institutions, and Coalitions for Low Carbon Transportation in Emerging Countries; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Lamíquiz Daudéna F.J.; Carpio-Pinedoa J.; García-Pastor A. Transport interchange and local urban environment integration. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 160, 215-223.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Le Vine S.; Zolfaghari A.; Polak J. Carsharing: Evolution, Challenges and Opportunities, 22th ACEA Scientific Advisory Group Report. 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Li Y.; Voege T. Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Challenges of implementation and policy required. J. Transp. Technol. 2017, 7, 95-106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. Lopez-Ruiz H.G.; Christidis P.; Demirel H.; Kompil M. Quantifying the Effects of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. Report EUR 2013, 26123.

44. Lubello V.; Bousse Y. Review of New Mobility Services and Technologies and Set-up of Knowledge 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. MaaS Alliance, White Paper: Guidelines & Recommendations to Create the Foundations for a Thriving MaaS Ecosystem. MaaS Alliance, Brussels. 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Machado C.A.S.; de Salles Hue N.P.M.; Berssaneti F.T.; Quintanilha J.A. An overview of shared mobility. Sustainability 2018, 10.

47. Martinez L.M.; Viegas J.M. Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, 13-27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Meena S. Impact of novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on travel pattern: A case study of India. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 13, 2491-2501.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Meline T. Selecting Studies for Systemic Review: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord. Cicsd 2006, 33, 21-27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Mestayer P.; Abidi A.; André M.; Bocher E.; Bougnol J.; Bourges B.; Brécard D.; Broc J.-S.; Bulteau J.; Chiron M. Urban Mobility Plan Environmental Impacts Assessment: A Methodology Including Socio-Economic Consequences-The Eval-PDU Project. Proceedings of the 10th Urban Environment Symposium Urban Futures for a Sustainable World, Gothenburg, Sweden, 9–11 June 2010, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Mobile Metropolises: Urban Transport Matters. An IEG Evaluation of the World Bank Group’s Support for Urban Transport; The World Bank 1818 H Street NW: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Mukhtar-Landgren D.; Karlsson M.; Koglin A.; Wendle B. Institutional Conditions for Integrated Mobility Services (IMS).K2 Working Papers. 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Münzel K.; Boon W.; Frenken K.; Blomme J.; van der Linden D. Explaining carsharing supply across Western European cities. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2020, 14, 243-254.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Niemann C. Villkorat förtroende: Normer och förväntningar I relationen mellan politiker och tjänstemän I regeringskansliet. Stockh. Stud. Politics 2013, 153, 293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

55. Pangbourne K.; Mladenović M.N.; Stead D.; Milakis D. Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 35-49.

56. Pawar D.S.; Yadav A.K.; Akolekar N.; Velaga N.R. Impact of Physical Distancing due to Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) on Daily Travel for Work during Transition to Lockdown. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020, 7, 100203.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Polis, Mobility as a Service: Implications for Urban and Regional Transport. Polis Network, Brussels. 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Rani M.; Vyas O.P. Smart Bike Sharing System to Make the City Even Smarter. Advances in Computer and Computational Sciences; Bhatia S.; Mishra K.; Tiwari S.; Singh V. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
59. Raubal M.; Jonietz D.; Ciari F.; Boulouchos K.; Küng L.; Georges G.; Hirschberg S.; Schenler W.; Cox B.; Kannan R. Towards an Energy Efficient and Climate Compatible Future Swiss Transportation System. Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research—Efficient Technologies and Systems for Mobility; CCER Mobility: Zürich, Switzerland, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

60. Sam E.F.; Abane A.M. Enhancing passenger safety and security in Ghana: Appraising public transport operators’ recent interventions. J. Sci. Technol. Ghana 2017, 37, 101-112.

61. Santos G. Sustainability and shared mobility models. Sustainability 2018, 10.

62. Schipper L. Automobile use, fuel economy and CO2 emissions in industrialized countries: Encouraging trends through 2008?. Transp. Policy 2011, 18, 358-372.

63. Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities Thousand Oaks; Sage Publications: Szouzendoux, CA, USA, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

64. Semanjski I.; Bellens R.; Gautama S.; Witlox F. Integrating big data into a sustainable mobility policy 2.0 planning support system. Sustainability 2016, 8.

65. Shaheen S.; Chan N. Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environ. 2016, 42, 573-588.

66. Shaheen S.; Cohen A. Impacts of Shared Mobility. 2018.

67. Shaheen S.; Martin E.; Hoffman-Stapleton M. Shared mobility and urban form impacts: A case study of peer-to-peer (P2P) carsharing in the US. J. Urban Des. 2019.

68. Shaheen S.; Zhang H.; Martin E.; Guzman S. China’s Hangzhou public bicycle. Transp. Res. Rec. 2011, 2247, 33-41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
69. Shaheen S.A. Introduction shared-use vehicle services for sustainable transportation: Carsharing, bikesharing, and personal vehicle sharing across the globe. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2013, 7, 1-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
70. Shaheen S.A.; Cohen A.P. Carsharing and personal vehicle services: Worldwide market developments and emerging trends. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2013, 7, 5-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

71. Smith G.; Sochor J.; Karlsson I.M. Intermediary MaaS Integrators: A case study on hopes and fears. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 163-177.

72. Snelder M.; Wilmink I.; van der Gun J.; Bergveld H.J.; Hoseini P.; van Arem B. Mobility impacts of automated driving and shared mobility: Explorative model and case study of the province of north Holland. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2019, 19, 291-309.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

73. Storme T.; De Vos J.; De Paepe L.; Witlox F. Limitations to the car-substitution effect of MaaS. Findings from a Belgian pilot study. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 196-205.

74. Streeting M.; Brown S. The Economic Benefits of New Mobility for Australia. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
75. Van Acker V.; Goodwin P.; Witlox F. Key research themes on travel behavior, lifestyle, and sustainable urban mobility. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2016, 10, 25-32.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
76. Van Acker V.; Van Cauwenberge B.; Witlox F. MaxSUMO: A new expert approach for evaluating mobility management projects. Promet Traffic Transp. 2013, 25, 286-294.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
77. Wittstock R.; Teuteberg F. Sustainability Impacts of Mobility as a Service: A Scoping Study for Technology Assessment. Progress in Life Cycle Assessment 2018; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 61-74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

78. Wong Y.Z.; Hensher D.A.; Mulley C. Mobility as a service (MaaS): Charting a future context. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 5-19.

79. Wright S.; Nelson J.D.; Cottrill C.D. MaaS for the suburban market: Incorporating carpooling in the mix. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 206-218.

80. Xu S.J.; Chow J.Y. A longitudinal study of bike infrastructure impact on bikesharing system performance in New York City. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2020, 14, 886-902.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. What hinders car owners€™ participation in private car sharing? Insights from a business perspective. (2025). Li, Mengxia ; Feng, Tao.
   In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
   RePEc:eee:joreco:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924004569.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Understanding collaborative consumption in the technology-driven sharing economy: A cost-benefit analysis perspective. (2024). Sun, KE.
   In: PLOS ONE.
   RePEc:plo:pone00:0309024.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Governance of urban mobility policies and plans in Asian cities. (2024). Regmi, Madan B.
   In: Transport Policy.
   RePEc:eee:trapol:v:149:y:2024:i:c:p:108-121.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Assessing social and spatial access equity in regulatory frameworks for moped-style scooter sharing services. (2023). Bach, Xavier ; Marquet, Oriol ; Miralles-Guasch, Carme.
   In: Transport Policy.
   RePEc:eee:trapol:v:132:y:2023:i:c:p:154-162.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Demographic and generational determinants of Poles’ participation in the sharing economy: Findings from a survey data analysis. (2022). Podgrniak-Krzykacz, Aldona ; Warwas, Izabela ; Wiktorowicz, Justyna.
   In: PLOS ONE.
   RePEc:plo:pone00:0265341.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. A New Mobility Era: Stakeholders’ Insights regarding Urban Air Mobility. (2022). Pagoni, Ioanna ; Koumoutsidi, Annitsa ; Polydoropoulou, Amalia.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3128-:d:766010.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Drivers’ perceptions of the sharing economy for transport services. (2022). Mozahem, Najib Ali ; Hossain, Mokter.
   In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
   RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:179:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522002001.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Casual Carpooling as a Strategy to Implement Mobility-as-a-Service schemes in a Developing Country. (2021). nicolaï, isabelle ; Antonialli, Fabio ; Gandia, Rodrigo ; Patricio, Lucas ; Oliveira, Julia ; Sugano, Joel ; Nicolai, Isabelle.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03687581.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. An Ecosystem Innovation Framework: Assessing Mobility as a Service in Budapest. (2021). Pagoni, Ioanna ; Tsirimpa, Athena ; Roumboutsos, Athena ; Polydoropoulou, Amalia.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3753-:d:525468.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Impact Assessments of New Mobility Services: A Critical Review. (2021). Storme, Tom ; Azadi, Hossein ; Witlox, Frank ; Casier, Corneel.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3074-:d:515067.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Providers and Practices: How Suppliers Shape Car-Sharing Practices. (2021). , Elisabeth.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1764-:d:494720.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Public Policies to Promote Sustainable Transports: Lessons from Valencia. (2021). Mateu, Guillermo ; Sanz, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1141-:d:485387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. The Impact of Carsharing on Transport in the City. Case Study of Tri-City in Poland. (2021). Neumann, Tomasz.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:688-:d:479207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Value co-creation and co-destruction in service ecosystems: The case of the Reach Now app. (2021). Schulz, Thomas ; Zimmermann, Sina ; Bohm, Markus ; Krcmar, Helmut ; Gewald, Heiko.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:170:y:2021:i:c:s0040162521003589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Ridesharing in Adelaide: Segmentation of users. (2021). Mehdizadeh, Milad ; Khalaj, Fahimeh ; Pojani, Dorina ; Allan, Andrew ; Soltani, Ali.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:92:y:2021:i:c:s0966692321000831.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Assessing Trust and Risk Perceptions in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Study. (2021). Song, Xiaoxiao ; Zhang, Tingting ; Gu, Huimin ; Lu, Can.
    In: Journal of Management Studies.
    RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:58:y:2021:i:4:p:1002-1032.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Pricing and capacity allocation strategies: Implications for manufacturers with product sharing. (2020). Nu, YU ; Dai, Bin.
    In: Naval Research Logistics (NRL).
    RePEc:wly:navres:v:67:y:2020:i:3:p:201-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Modelling consumption behaviour changes in a B2C electric vehicle-sharing system: a perceived systemic risk perspective. (2020). Ma, Yuge ; Thornton, Thomas F ; Lan, Jing ; Mangalagiu, Diana ; Zhu, Dajian.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:160:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-019-02439-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Policies for Reducing Car Traffic and Their Problematisation. Lessons from the Mobility Strategies of British, Dutch, German and Swedish Cities. (2020). Rye, Tom ; Hrelja, Robert.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8170-:d:423473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. (2020). Mladenovi, Milo N ; Pangbourne, Kate ; Stead, Dominic ; Milakis, Dimitris.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:131:y:2020:i:c:p:35-49.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Implications of peer-to-peer product sharing when the selling firm joins the sharing market. (2020). Wang, Xuan ; Dong, Ciwei ; To, Chi.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:219:y:2020:i:c:p:138-151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. What drives the governance of ridesharing? A fuzzy-set QCA of local regulations in China. (2019). Li, Yanwei ; Ma, Liang.
    In: Policy Sciences.
    RePEc:kap:policy:v:52:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11077-019-09359-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Peer-to-Peer Product Sharing: Implications for Ownership, Usage, and Social Welfare in the Sharing Economy. (2019). Li, Xiang ; Benjaafar, Saif ; Kong, Guangwen ; Courcoubetis, Costas.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:2:p:477-493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. When Is an Innovative Urban Mobility Business Model Sustainable? A Literature Review and Analysis. (2019). Marx, Roberto ; Ribeiro, Joo Valsecchi ; de Mello, Adriana Marotti.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1761-:d:216599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The Research of Tripartite Collaborative Governance on Disorderly Parking of Shared Bicycles Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Motivation Theories—A Case of Beijing, China. (2019). Wang, DI ; Zhao, Daozhi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5431-:d:272405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Pumping the Brakes on Robot Cars: Current Urban Traveler Willingness to Consider Driverless Vehicles. (2019). Kelley, Scott B ; Decicco, John M ; Lane, Bradley W.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:5042-:d:267458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The impact of free-floating carsharing on car ownership: Early-stage findings from London. (2019). le Vine, Scott ; Polak, John.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:119-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Exploring the Relationships Among Travel Multimodality, Driving Behavior, Use of Ridehailing and Energy Consumption. (2019). Lee, Yongsung ; Circella, Giovanni ; Alemi, Farzad.
    In: Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt31v7z2vf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Impact of Different Stakeholders of Bike-Sharing Industry on Users’ Intention of Civilized Use of Bike-Sharing. (2018). Liu, Yaqian ; Jia, Lin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1437-:d:144741.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Empirical Examination of Users’ Adoption of the Sharing Economy in China Using an Expanded Technology Acceptance Model. (2018). Yang, Yutao ; Liu, Yupeng.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1262-:d:142140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. An Overview of Shared Mobility. (2018). Marie, Nicolas Patrick ; Quintanilha, Jose Alberto ; Berssaneti, Fernando Tobal ; Soares, Claudia A.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4342-:d:184715.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Technology: A Necessary but Not Sufficient Condition for Future Personal Mobility. (2018). Martinez-Diaz, Margarita ; Perez, Ignacio ; Soriguera, Francesc.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4141-:d:182008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Collectively Building a Sustainable Sharing Economy Based on Trust and Regulation. (2018). Hofmann, Eva ; Penz, Elfriede ; Hartl, Barbara.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3754-:d:176478.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Technology and Instrument Constituencies as Agents of Innovation: Sustainability Transitions and the Governance of Urban Transport. (2018). Goyal, Nihit ; Howlett, Michael.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1198-:d:145303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Cognitive aspects of car sharing in Millennials. Active sharers and reluctant users. (2018). Magnani, Giovanna ; Bertolotti, Tommaso ; Zucchella, Antonella.
    In: MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?.
    RePEc:fan:mcmcmc:v:html10.3280/mc2018-001004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Peer-To-Peer (P2P) Carsharing: Understanding Early Markets, Social Dynamics, and Behavioral Impacts. (2018). Shaheen, Susan Phd ; Martin, Elliot Phd ; Bansal, Apaar.
    In: Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings.
    RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt7s8207tb.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Car sharing adoption intention in urban areas: What are the key sociodemographic drivers?. (2017). Stan, Valentina ; Prieto, Marc ; Baltas, George.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:218-227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. To earn is not enough: A means-end analysis to uncover peer-providers participation motives in peer-to-peer carsharing. (2017). Falk, Tomas ; Henkel, Sven ; Wilhelms, Mark-Philipp.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:125:y:2017:i:c:p:38-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-02 21:23:22 || Missing content? Let us know