Akyelken, N.; Banister, D.; Givoni, M. The sustainability of shared mobility in London: The dilemma for governance. Sustainability 2018, 10, 420. [CrossRef]
Al Haddad, C.; Chaniotakis, E.; Straubinger, A.; Plötner, K.; Antoniou, C. Factors affecting the adoption and use of urban air mobility. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 132, 696â712. [CrossRef]
- Al Haddad, C.; Fu, M.; Straubinger, A.; Plötner, K.; Antoniou, C. Choosing Suitable Indicators for the Assessment of urban air mobility: A case study of upper bavaria, germany. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2020, 20, 214â232.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Available online: https://www.level5design.com.au/uploads/1/2/4/6/124618711/workshop_report_-_readiness_for_selfdriving_vehicles_in_australia. pdf (accessed on 2 December 2021).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bickerstaff, K.; Tolley, R.; Walker, G. Transport planning and participation: The rhetoric and realities of public involvement. J. Transp. Geogr. 2002, 10, 61â73. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cascetta, E.; Cartenì, A.; Pagliara, F.; Montanino, M. A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: A decisionmaking model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods. Transp. Policy 2015, 38, 27â39. [CrossRef]
Cohen, A.; Shaheen, S. Urban Air Mobility: Opportunities and Obstacles. In International Encyclopedia of Transportation. UC Berkeley: Transportation Sustainability Research Center. 2021. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0r23p1gm (accessed on 5 October 2021). [CrossRef]
Cohen, A.P.; Shaheen, S.A.; Farrar, E.M. Urban air mobility: History, ecosystem, market potential, and challenges. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 22, 6074â6087. [CrossRef]
- Cokorilo, O. Urban air mobility: Safety challenges. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 45, 21â29. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Desai, K.; Al Haddad, C.; Antoniou, C. Roadmap to early implementation of passenger air mobility: Findings from a delphi study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10612. [CrossRef]
- EASA. Study on the Societal Acceptance of Urban Air Mobility in Europe. 19 May 2021. Available online: https://www.easa. europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/uam-full-report.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2021).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eker, U.; Fountas, G.; Anastasopoulos, P.C. An exploratory empirical analysis of willingness to pay for and use flying cars. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2020, 104, 105993. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2022, 14, 3128 18 of 18
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eker, U.; Fountas, G.; Anastasopoulos, P.C.; Still, S.E. An exploratory investigation of public perceptions towards key benefits and concerns from the future use of flying cars. Travel Behav. Soc. 2020, 19, 54â66. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fadhil, D.N.; Moeckel, R.; Rothfeld, R. GIS-based infrastructure requirement analysis for an electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle-based transportation system. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 41, 101â103. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fu, M.; Rothfeld, R.; Antoniou, C. Exploring preferences for transportation modes in an urban air mobility environment: Munich case study. Transp. Res. Rec. 2019, 2673, 427â442. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Garrow, L.A.; German, B.; Mokhtarian, P.; Glodek, J.A. Survey to model demand for eVTOL urban air trips and competition with autonomous ground vehicles. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, San Diego, CA, USA, 7â11 January 2019; p. 2871.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Garrow, L.A.; German, B.J.; Leonard, C.E. Urban air mobility: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis with autonomous and electric ground transportation for informing future research. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2021, 132, 103377. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gnadt, A.R.; Speth, R.L.; Sabnis, J.S.; Barrett, S.R. Technical and environmental assessment of all-electric 180-passenger commercial aircraft. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2019, 105, 1â30. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Goodrich, K.H.; Theodore, C.R. Description of the NASA urban air mobility maturity level (UML) scale. In Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech Forum, Nashville, TN, USA, 11â15 January 2021; p. 1627.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Goyal, R. Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Market Study; National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search?q=Urban%20Air%20Mobility%20(UAM)%20Market%20Study (accessed on 6 June 2020).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kasliwal, A.; Furbush, N.J.; Gawron, J.H.; McBride, J.R.; Wallington, T.J.; De Kleine, R.D.; Kim, H.C.; Keoleian, G.A. Role of flying cars in sustainable mobility. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1555.
Lee, J.K.; Kim, S.H.; Sim, G.R. Mode choice behavior analysis of air transport on the introduction of remotely piloted passenger aircraft. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2019, 76, 48â55. [CrossRef]
- Lewis-Beck, M.S.; Bryman, A.; Futing Liao, T. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2004. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lohmann, G.; Vianna, C. Air route suspension: The role of stakeholder engagement and aviation and non-aviation factors. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2016, 53, 199â210. [CrossRef]
- Molesworth, B.R.; Koo, T.T. The influence of attitude towards individuals choice for a remotely piloted commercial flight: A latent class logit approach. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 71, 51â62. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Peeta, S.; Paz, A.; DeLaurentis, D. Stated preference analysis of a new very light jet based on-demand air service. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2008, 42, 629â645. [CrossRef]
- Polydoropoulou, A.; Pagoni, I.; Tsirimpa, A. Ready for mobility as a service? Insights from stakeholders and end-users. Travel Behav. Soc. 2020, 21, 295â306. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Price, G.; Helton, G.; Jenkins, K.; Kvicala, M.; Parker, S.; Wolfe, R. Urban Air Mobility Operational Concept (OpsCon) PassengerCarrying Operations; CRâ2020â5001587; National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20205001587/downloads/UAM%20Passenger-carrying%20OpsCon%20-%20v1 4%20GP%20accept.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2020).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pyrialakou, V.D.; Gkritza, K.; Liu, S.S. The use of focus groups to foster stakeholder engagement in intercity passenger rail planning. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2019, 7, 505â517. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rajendran, S.; Pagel, E. Recommendations for emerging air taxi network operations based on online review analysis of helicopter services. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05581. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rajendran, S.; Shulman, J. Study of emerging air taxi network operation using discrete-event systems simulation approach. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2020, 87, 101857. [CrossRef]
- Rath, S.; Chow, J.Y. Air Taxi Skyport Location Problem for Airport Access. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1904.01497.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rawson, R.; Hooper, P.D. The importance of stakeholder participation to sustainable airport master planning in the UK. Environ. Dev. 2013, 2, 36â47. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Reiche, C.; Cohen, A.P.; Fernando, C. An initial assessment of the potential weather barriers of urban air mobility. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 22, 6018â6027. [CrossRef]
Reiche, C.; Goyal, R.; Cohen, A.; Serrao, J.; Kimmel, S.; Fernando, C.; Shaheen, S. Urban Air Mobility Market Study. UC Berkeley: Transportation Sustainability Research Center. 2018. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0fz0x1s2 (accessed on 6 June 2020). [CrossRef] Sustainability 2022, 14, 3128 17 of 18
- Reiche, C.; McGillen, C.; Siegel, J.; Brody, F. Are we ready to weather urban air mobility (UAM). In Proceedings of the Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), Herndon, VA, USA, 9â11 April 2019; pp. 1â7. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rimjha, M.; Hotle, S.; Trani, A.; Hinze, N. Commuter demand estimation and feasibility assessment for urban air mobility in Northern California. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2021, 148, 506â524. [CrossRef]
- Roboam, X. New trends and challenges of electrical networks embedded in âmore electrical aircraftâ. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Gdansk, Poland, 27â30 June 2011; pp. 26â31.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rothfeld, R.; Fu, M.; BalacÌ, M.; Antoniou, C. Potential urban air mobility travel time savings: An Exploratory analysis of Munich, Paris, and San Francisco. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2217. [CrossRef]
- Schmeer, K. Stakeholder analysis guidelines. Policy Toolkit Strength. Health Sect. Reform 2000, 2, 1â43.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Serrao, J.; Nilsson, S.; Kimmel, S. A Legal and Regulatory Assessment for the Potential of Urban Air Mobility (UAM). UC Berkeley: Transportation Sustainability Research Center: United States. 2018. Available online: https://escholarship.org/content/qt49b8b9 w0/qt49b8b9w0.pdf (accessed on 27 April 2020).
Shaheen, S.; Cohen, A.; Farrar, E. The Potential Societal Barriers of Urban Air Mobility; National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 1â115.
- Smith, G.; Sochor, J.; Sarasini, S. Mobility as a service: Comparing developments in Sweden and Finland. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2018, 27, 36â45. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Staricco, L.; Rappazzo, V.; Scudellari, J.; Vitale Brovarone, E. Toward policies to manage the impacts of autonomous vehicles on the city: A visioning exercise. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5222. [CrossRef]
Stephenson, C.; Lohmann, G.; Spasojevic, B. Stakeholder engagement in the development of international air services: A case study on Adelaide Airport. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2018, 71, 45â54. [CrossRef]
- Straubinger, A.; Michelmann, J.; Biehle, T. Business model options for passenger urban air mobility. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 2021, 12, 361â380. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Straubinger, A.; Rothfeld, R.; Shamiyeh, M.; Büchter, K.D.; Kaiser, J.; Plötner, K.O. An overview of current research and developments in urban air mobilityâSetting the scene for UAM introduction. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2020, 87, 101852. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sun, X.; Wandelt, S.; Stumpf, E. Competitiveness of on-demand air taxis regarding door-to-door travel time: A race through Europe. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2018, 119, 1â18. [CrossRef]
- Surucu-Balci, E.; Balci, G.; Yuen, K.F. Social media engagement of stakeholders: A decision tree approach in container shipping. Comput. Ind. 2020, 115, 103152. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Torens, C.; Volkert, A.; Becker, D.; Gerbeth, D.; Schalk, L.; Garcia Crespillo, O.; Zhu, C.; Stelkens-Kobsch, T.; Gehrke, T.; MetzI, C.; et al. HorizonUAM: Safety and security considerations for urban air mobility. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, Online, 2â6 August 2021; p. 3199.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Upham, P.; Raper, D.; Thomas, C.; McLellan, M.; Lever, M.; Lieuwen, A. Environmental capacity and European air transport: Stakeholder opinion and implications for modelling. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2004, 10, 99â205. [CrossRef]
Winter, S.R.; Rice, S.; Lamb, T.L. A prediction model of Consumerâs willingness to fly in autonomous air taxis. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2020, 89, 101926. [CrossRef]