- Aguilera, R.V.; Aragon-Correa, J.A.; Marano, V.; Tashman, P. The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. J. Manag. 2021, 47, 1468–1497.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Andersson, L.M.; Bateman, T.S. Individual Environmental Initiative: Championing Natural Environmental Issues in U.S. Business Organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 2000, 43, 548–570.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Arora, P.; Dharwadkar, R. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2011, 19, 136–152. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Available online: https://www.ceres.org/sites/default/files/reports/2017-04/Power%20Forward%203.0%20-%20April% 202017%20-%20Final.pdf (accessed on 17 May 2022).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ayuso, S.; Rodríguez, M.A.; García-Castro, R.; Ariño, M.A. Maximizing stakeholders’ interests: An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Bus. Soc. 2014, 53, 414–439. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bansal, P. Inducing frame-breaking insights through qualitative research. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2013, 21, 127–130. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bansal, P.; Roth, K. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 2000, 43, 717–736.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bansal, P.; Song, H.-C. Similar But Not the Same: Differentiating Corporate Sustainability from Corporate Responsibility. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2017, 11, 105–149. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bear, S.; Rahman, N.; Post, C. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 97, 207–221. [CrossRef]
Cho, T.S.; Hambrick, D.C. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 2006, 17, 453–469. [CrossRef]
- Conger, J.; Toegel, G. A story of missed opportunities: Qualitative methods for leadership research and practice. In Grounding Leadership Theory and Research: Issues, Perspectives and Methods; Parry, K.W., Meindl, J.R., Eds.; Information Age Publishing: Greenwich, UK, 2002.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cosma, S.; Schwizer, P.; Nobile, L.; Leopizzi, R. Environmental attitude in the board. Who are the “green directors”? Evidences from Italy. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 3360–3375. [CrossRef]
- Cyert, R.M.; March, J.G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm; Englewood Cliffs: Bergen County, NJ, USA, 1963; Volume 2.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Daily, C.M.; Dalton, D.R.; Cannella, A.A. Introduction to special topic forum corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2003, 28, 371–382. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dam, L.; Scholtens, B. Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2012, 20, 233–252. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
De Masi, S.; Słomka-Goł˛ ebiowska, A.; Becagli, C.; Paci, A. Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 1865–1878. [CrossRef]
- De Villiers, C.; Naiker, V.; Van Staden, C.J. The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1636–1663. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Deckop, J.R.; Merriman, K.K.; Gupta, S. The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. J. Manag. 2006, 32, 329–342. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Deloitte. Board Practices Report: Perspectives from the Boardroom. 2014. Available online: http://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/ pages/center-for-corporate-governance/Articles/board-practices-report-perspectives-boardroom-governance.html (accessed on 17 May 2022).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 532–550. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ellinger, A.; Bostrom, R. An examination of managers’ beliefs about their roles as facilitators of learning. Manag. Learn. 2002, 33, 147–179. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Elmagrhi, M.H.; Ntim, C.G.; Elamer, A.A.; Zhang, Q. A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 206–220. [CrossRef]
Fabrizi, M.; Mallin, C.; Michelon, G. The role of CEO’s personal incentives in driving corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2014, 124, 311–326. [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, A.L.; Mazza, C. Boards Under Crisis: Board Action Under Pressure; Palgrave McMillan: London, UK, 2014.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Finkelstein, S.; Hambrick, D.C.; Cannella, A.A. Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fong, E.A. CEO pay fairness as a predictor of stakeholder management. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 404–410. [CrossRef]
- Forbes, D.P.; Milliken, F.J. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1999, 24, 489–505. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Galbreath, J. Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. J. Manag. Organ. 2011, 17, 17–38.
Galbreath, J. Do boards of directors influence corporate sustainable development? An attention-based analysis. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2018, 27, 742–756. [CrossRef]
Gallego-Sosa, C.; Fernández-Torres, Y.; Gutiérrez-Fernández, M. Does gender diversity affect the environmental performance of banks? Sustainability 2020, 12, 10172. [CrossRef]
- Gioia, D.A.; Corley, K.G.; Hamilton, A.L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 2013, 16, 15–31. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2022, 14, 8391 17 of 17
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Glass, C.; Cook, A.; Ingersoll, A.R. Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2016, 25, 495–511. [CrossRef]
- Goulding, C. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers; Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2002.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Guerrero, S.; Lapalme, M.-È.; Herrbach, O.; Séguin, M. Board member monitoring behaviors in credit unions: The role of conscientiousness and identification with shareholders. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2017, 25, 134–144. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hafsi, T.; Turgut, G. Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 112, 463–479. [CrossRef]
- Hahn, T.; Preuss, L.; Pinkse, J.; Figge, F. Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2014, 39, 463–487. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hambrick, D.C. Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 334–343. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hillman, A.J.; Keim, G.D.; Luce, R.A. Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Bus. Soc. 2001, 40, 295–314. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2022, 14, 8391 16 of 17
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Husted, B.W.; Allen, D.B. Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2006, 37, 838–849. [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. In Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. Available online: http://ar5-syr.ipcc.ch/index.php (accessed on 17 May 2022).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jain, T.; Jamali, D. Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2016, 24, 253–273. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jamali, D.; Safieddine, A.M.; Rabbath, M. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2008, 16, 443–459. [CrossRef]
Jizi, M. The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 640–655. [CrossRef]
- Johnson, R.A.; Greening, D.W. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. J. 1999, 42, 564–576.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Joseph, J.; Ocasio, W. Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General electric from 1951 to 2001. Strateg. Manag. J. 2012, 33, 633–660. [CrossRef]
- Kassinis, G.; Vafeas, N. Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strateg. Manag. J. 2002, 23, 399–415. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Khan, K.; Zahid, R.M.A.; Saleem, A.; Sági, J. Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model. Anal. Chin. Firms. Sustain. 2021, 13, 10662. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kiron, D.; Kruschwitz, N.; Rubel, H.; Reeves, M.; Fuisz-Kehrbach, S.-K. Sustainability’s next frontier. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2014, 55, 1–25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Knudsen, J.S.; Geisler, K.; Ege, M. Corporate social responsibility in the board room–when do directors pay attention? Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 2013, 16, 238–246. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kock, C.J.; Santaló, J.; Diestre, L. Corporate governance and the environment: What type of governance creates greener companies? J. Manag. Stud. 2012, 49, 492–514. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lash, J.; Wellington, F. Competitive advantage on a warming planet. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2007, 85, 94–102. [PubMed]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lavin, J.F.; Montecinos-Pearce, A.A. ESG Disclosure in an Emerging Market: An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Board Characteristics and Ownership Structure. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10498. [CrossRef]
Leblanc, R.; Schwartz, M.S. The black box of board process: Gaining access to a difficult subject. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2007, 15, 843–851. [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhao, F.; Jiang, W.; Liu, T.; Shi, S. Gender diversity on boards and firms’ environmental policy. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 306–315. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lopatta, K.; Jaeschke, R.; Canitz, F.; Kaspereit, T. International evidence on the relationship between insider and bank ownership and CSR performance. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2017, 25, 41–57. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lu, J.; Herremans, I.M. Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 1449–1464. [CrossRef]
Mahoney, L.S.; Thorn, L. An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A Canadian investigation. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 69, 149–162. [CrossRef]
Mallin, C.; Michelon, G.; Raggi, D. Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: How does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 114, 29–43. [CrossRef]
Manner, M.H. The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 93, 53–72. [CrossRef]
- Mazutis, D. Leadership and corporate responsibility: A review of the empirical evidence. Ann. Soc. Responsib. 2015, 1, 76–107. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mazutis, D. Much ado about nothing: The glacial pace of CSR implementation in practice. In Business and Society 360; Weber, J., Wasieleski, D., Eds.; Emerald Publishing: West Yorkshire, UK, 2018; pp. 177–243.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mazutis, D.; Eckardt, A. Sleepwalking into catastrophe: Cognitive biases and corporate climate change inertia. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2017, 59, 74–108. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McGuire, J.; Dow, S.; Argheyd, K. CEO incentives and corporate social performance. J. Bus. Ethics 2003, 45, 341–359. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McNulty, T.; Zattoni, A.; Douglas, T. Developing corporate governance research through qualitative methods: A review of previous studies. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2013, 21, 183–198. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Merriman, K.K.; Sen, S. Incenting managers toward the triple bottom line: An agency and social norm perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2012, 51, 851–871. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Muyingo, H. Organizational challenges in the adoption of building applied photovoltaics in the Swedish tenant-owner housing sector. Sustainability 2015, 7, 3637–3664. [CrossRef]
- Nadeem, M.; Bahadar, S.; Gull, A.A.; Iqbal, U. Are women eco-friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 3146–3161.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nielsen, S.; Huse, M. The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2010, 18, 136–148. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nigam, A.; Ocasio, W. Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organ. Sci. 2010, 21, 823–841. [CrossRef]
- O’Reilly, K.; Paper, D.; Marx, S. Demystifying grounded theory for business research. Organ. Res. Methods 2012, 15, 247–262. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ocasio, W. Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 2011, 22, 1286–1296. [CrossRef]
Ocasio, W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997, 18, 187–206. [CrossRef]
Orazalin, N. Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 140–153.
Orazalin, N.; Mahmood, M. Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 3569–3588. [CrossRef]
- Paroutis, S.; Heracleous, L. Discourse revisited: Dimensions and employment of first-order strategy discourse during institutional adoption. Strateg. Manag. J. 2013, 34, 935–956. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pinkse, J.; Gasbarro, F. Managing physical impacts of climate change: An attentional perspective on corporate adaptation. Bus. Soc. 2019, 58, 333–368. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pye, A.; Pettigrew, A. Studying board context, process and dynamics: Some challenges for the future. Br. J. Manag. 2005, 16, S27–S38. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rerup, C. Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 2009, 20, 876–893. [CrossRef]
Sekarlangit, L.D.; Wardhani, R. The effect of the characteristics and activities of the board of directors on sustainable development goal (SDG) disclosures: Empirical evidence from Southeast Asia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8007. [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad. Manag. J. 2000, 43, 681–697.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sharma, S.; Pablo, A.L.; Vredenburg, H. Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: The importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 1999, 35, 87–108. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Shropshire, C.; Hillman, A.J. A longitudinal study of significant change in stakeholder management. Bus. Soc. 2007, 46, 63–87. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Simon, H.A. Administrative Behavior; MacMillan Publishers: Chicago, IL, USA, 1947.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Slawinski, N.; Bansal, P. Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ. Sci. 2015, 26, 531–549. [CrossRef]
- Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research; Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1990.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tingbani, I.; Chithambo, L.; Tauringana, V.; Papanikolaou, N. Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 2194–2210. [CrossRef]
Walls, J.L.; Berrone, P.; Phan, P.H. Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strateg. Manag. J. 2012, 33, 885–913. [CrossRef]
- World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report 2022. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-risks-report-20 22 (accessed on 30 March 2022). Sustainability 2022, 14, 8391 15 of 17
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zhang, J.Q.; Zhu, H.; Ding, H.-B. Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 114, 381–392. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Chen, S.; Xiong, C. Organizational attention to corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of corporate governance. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 2016, 25, 386–399. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now