1. Risk Aversion and Information Aggregation in Asset Markets. (2019). Mantovani, Marco ; Filippin, Antonio ; Marco, Mantovani ; Antonio, Filippin.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:mib:wpaper:404.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Abdellaoui, M., Driouchi, A., & L’Haridon, O. (2011). Risk aversion elicitation: Reconciling tractability and bias minimization. Theory and Decision, 71, 63–80.

2. Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Ruström, E. E. (2006). Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics, 9, 383–405.

3. Anderson, L. R. & Mellor, J. M. (2008). Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference. Journal of Health Economics, 27(5), 1260–1274.

4. Anderson, L. R. & Mellor, J. M. (2009). Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39, 137–160.

5. Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J.-R., & Wengström, E. (2016). Risk aversion relates to cognitive ability: Preference or noise? Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(5), 1129–1154.

6. Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J.-R., & Wengström, E. (2018). Robust inference in risk elicitation tasks. Working Paper.

7. Anzoni, L. & Zeisberger, S. (2016). What is risk? How investors perceive risk in return distributions. Working Paper.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Apesteguia, J. & Ballester, M. A. (2018). Monotone stochastic choice models: The case of risk and time preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 126(1), 74–106.

9. Arrow, K. J. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk bearing (Y. J. Saatio, Ed.). Helsinki: Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Azrieli, Y., Chambers, C. P., & Healy, P. J. (2018). Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis.

11. Barsky, R., Juster, F., Kimball, M., & Shapiro, M. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 537–579.

12. Bauermeister, G.-F., Hermann, D., & Musshoff, O. (2017). Consistency of determined risk attitudes and probability weightings across different elicitation methods. Theory and Decision, online first, 1–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Beauchamp, J., Cesarini, D., & Johannesson, M. (2017). The psychometric and empirical properties of measures of risk preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 54, 203–237.

14. Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226–232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (2005). Risk aversion elicitation: Reconciling tractability and bias minimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 102(11), 4209–4214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural india. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 395–407.

17. Binswanger, H. P. (1981). Attitudes toward risk: Theoretical implications of an experiment in rural india. The Economic Journal, 91(364), 867–890.

18. Bock, O., Baetge, I., & Nicklisch, A. (2014). hroot: Hamburg registration and organization online tool. European Economic Review, 71, 117–120.

19. Bruner, D. M. (2009). Changing the probability versus changing the reward. Experimental Economics, 12(4), 367–385.

20. Bruner, D. M. (2011). Multiple switching behaviour in multiple price lists. Applied Economics Letters, 18(5), 417–420.

21. Camerer, C. F. & Ho, T.-H. (1994). Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(2), 187–196.

22. Carbone, E. & Hey, J. D. (1995). A comparison of the estimates of expected utility and non-expectedutility preference functionals. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 20(1), 111–133.

23. Carlsson, F., Mørkbak, M. R., & Olsen, S. B. (2012). The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments. Journal of Choice Modelling, 5(2), 19–37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 43–51.

25. Charness, G., Offerman, T., T. Garcia, & Villeval, M. (2019). Do measures of risk attitudes in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory? IZA Discussion Paper, No. 12395.

26. Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97.

27. Cohen, M., Jaffray, J.-Y., & Said, T. (1987). Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 1–22.

28. Crosetto, P. & Filippin, A. (2013). The “bomb” risk elicitation task. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 47, 31–65.

29. Crosetto, P. & Filippin, A. (2015). A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods. Experimental Economics, 18(6), 1–29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Crosetto, P. & Filippin, A. (2017). Safe options induce gender differences in risk attitudes. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 10793s.

31. Csermely, T. & Rabas, A. (2016). How to reveal people’s preferences: Comparing time consistency and predictive power of multiple price list risk elicitation methods. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 53(2), 107–136.

32. Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1998). On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experimental Economics, 1, 115–131.

33. Dave, C., Eckel, C. C., Johnson, C. A., & Rojas, C. (2010). Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(3), 219–243.

34. Deck, C., Lee, J., Reyes, J. A., & Rosen, C. C. (2013). A failed attempt to explain within subject variation in risk taking behavior using domain specific risk attitudes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 1–24.

35. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2010). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? American Economic Review, 100(3), 1238–1260.

36. Dohmen, T., Huffman, D., Schupp, J., Falk, A., Sunde, U., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550.

37. Dulleck, U., Fooken, J., & Fell, J. (2015). Within-subject intra- and inter-method consistency of two experimental risk attitude elicitation methods. German Economic Review, 16, 104–121.

38. Eckel, C. C. & Grossman, P. J. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 281–295.

39. Eckel, C. C. & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 1–17.

40. Eliashberg, J. & Hauser, J. R. (1985). A measurement error approach for modeling consumer risk preference. Management Science, 31(1), 1–25.

41. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.

42. Frey, R., Pedroni, A., Mata, R., Rieskamp, J., & Hertwig, R. (2017). Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Science Advances, 3, e1701381.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. Friedman, D., Habib, S., James, D., & Crockett, S. (2018). Varieties of risk elicitation. WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP II 2018-501.

44. Gul, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica, 59(3), 667–686.

45. Harrison, G. W. & Ruström, E. E. (2008). Risk aversion in the laboratory. In J. Cox & G. Harrison (Eds.), Risk aversion in experiments (pp. 41–196). Research in Experimental Economics 12. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. He, T.-S. & Hong, F. (2017). Risk breeds risk aversion. Experimental Economics, 21(4), 815–835.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Hey, J. D. & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62(6), 1291–1326.

48. Hey, J. D., Morone, A., & Schmidt, U. (2009). Noise and bias in eliciting preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39, 213–235.

49. Holt, C. A. & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.

50. Holt, C. A. & Laury, S. K. (2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects: New data without order effects. American Economic Review, 95(3), 902–904.

51. Holzmeister, F. (2017). oTree: Ready-made apps for risk preference elicitation methods. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 16, 33–38.

52. Holzmeister, F., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., Lindern, F., Weitzel, U., & Zeisberger, S. (2018). What drives risk perception? A global survey with financial professionals and lay people. OSF Preprints. doi:10. 31219/osf.io/v6r9n Holzmeister, F. & Pfurtscheller, A. (2016). oTree: The “bomb” risk elicitation task. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 10, 105–108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

53. Isaac, R. M. & James, D. (2000). Just who are you calling risk averse? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(2), 177–187.

54. Jacobson, S. & Petrie, R. (2009). Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 38(2), 143–158.

55. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

56. Lévy-Garboua, L., Maafi, H., Masclet, D., & Terracol, A. (2012). Risk aversion and framing effects. Experimental Economics, 15, 128–144.

57. Loomes, G. & Pogrebna, G. (2014). Measuring individual risk attitudes when preferences are imprecise. The Economic Journal, 124(576), 569–593.

58. Loomes, G., Moffat, P. G., & Sugden, R. (2002). A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24(2), 103–130.

59. Luce, R. D. & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. B. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 249–410). New York: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

60. Lusk, J. & Coble, K. (2005). Risk Perceptions, Risk Preference, and Acceptance of Risky Food. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 393–405.

61. Mata, R., Frey, R., Richter, D., Schupp, J., & Hertwig, R. (2018). Risk reference: A view from psychology. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 155–172.

62. Meraner, M., Musshoff, O., & Finger, R. (2018). Using involvement to reduce inconsistencies in risk preference elicitation. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 73, 22–33.

63. Pedroni, A., Frey, R., Bruhin, A., Dutilh, G., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2017). The risk elicitation puzzle. Nature Human Behavior, 1, 803–809.

64. Reynaud, A. & Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: Results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision, 73(2), 203–221.

65. Ruggeri, M. & Coretti, S. (2015). Do probability and certainty equivalent techniques lead to inconsistent results? Evidence from gambles involving life-years and quality of life. Value in Health, 18, 413– 420.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

66. Sen, A. (1993). Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica, 61(3), 495–521.

67. Slovic, P. (1964). Assessment of risk taking behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 61(3), 220.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Slovic, P. (1972a). Information processing, situation specificity, and the generality of risk-taking behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(1), 128–134.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

69. Slovic, P. (1972b). Psychological study of human judgment: Implications for investment decision making. Journal of Finance, 27(4), 779–799.

70. Smith, A. (1968). The money game. New York: Random House.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

71. Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 332–382.

72. Starmer, C. & Sugden, R. (1991). Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. American Economic Review, 81(4), 971–978.

73. Sugden, R. (1991). Rational choice: A survey of contributions from economics and philosophy. The Economic Journal, 101(407), 751–785.

74. Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. America Economic Review, 100(1), 557–571.

75. Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking and Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

76. Tversky, A. & Thaler, R. (1990). Preference reversals. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 201–211.

77. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95(3), 371–384.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
78. Vosgerau, J. & Peer, E. (2018). Extreme malleability of preferences: Absolute preference sign changes under uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32, 38–46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

79. Wakker, P. P. (2008). Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family. Health Economics, 17, 1329–1344.

80. Wakker, P. P. & Deneffe, D. (1996). Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Science, 42(8), 1131–1150.

81. Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263–290.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
82. Weller, J. A., Dieckmann, N. F., Tusler, M., Mertz, C. K., Burns, W. J., & Peters, E. (2013). Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A Rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 198–212.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
83. Wilcox, N. T. (2008). Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: A critical primer and econometric comparison. In J. Cox & G. Harrison (Eds.), Risk aversion in experiments (pp. 197– 292). Research in Experimental Economics 12. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. The risk elicitation puzzle revisited: Across-methods (in)consistency?. (2019). Stefan, Matthias ; Holzmeister, Felix.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:inn:wpaper:2019-19.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Individual pension risk preference elicitation and collective asset allocation with heterogeneity. (2019). Swinkels, Laurens ; dellaert, benedict.
   In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
   RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:101:y:2019:i:c:p:206-225.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Risk Attitudes and Preferences for Redistribution: New Evidence from the Lab. (2018). TURATI, Gilberto ; Piacenza, Massimiliano ; Maffioletti, Anna ; Assandri, Matteo.
   In: CESifo Economic Studies.
   RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:64:y:2018:i:3:p:489-515..

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Consistency of determined risk attitudes and probability weightings across different elicitation methods. (2018). Musshoff, Oliver ; Bauermeister, Golo-Friedrich ; Hermann, Daniel.
   In: Theory and Decision.
   RePEc:kap:theord:v:84:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-017-9616-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Higher-order risk preferences in social settings. (2018). Heinrich, Timo ; Mayrhofer, Thomas.
   In: Experimental Economics.
   RePEc:kap:expeco:v:21:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-017-9541-4.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Incidental emotions and risk-taking: An experimental analysis. (2018). Russo, Alberto ; Marini, Matteo M. ; Colasante, Annarita.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:jau:wpaper:2018/13.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Using involvement to reduce inconsistencies in risk preference elicitation. (2018). Musshoff, Oliver ; Finger, Robert ; Meraner, Manuela.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:73:y:2018:i:c:p:22-33.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Are foresters really risk-averse? A multi-method analysis and a cross-occupational comparison. (2018). Musshoff, Oliver ; Sauter, Philipp A ; Hermann, Daniel.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:95:y:2018:i:c:p:37-45.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Loan Contract Structure and Adverse Selection: Survey Evidence from Uganda. (2018). Stryjan, Miri ; Madestam, Andreas ; Gulesci, Selim ; Ahlin, Christian.
   In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12742.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Felicidad en la política pública: una revisión de la literatura. (2018). García Molina, Mario ; Chicaiza, Liliana ; Rodriguez, Jhonathan.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economia.
    RePEc:col:000093:016014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Multiple switching behavior in different display formats of multiple price lists. (2017). Musshoff, Oliver ; Bauermeister, Golo-Friedrich.
    In: DARE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:daredp:1706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Incidental emotions and risk-taking: An experimental analysis. (2017). Russo, Alberto ; Colasante, Annarita.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:76992.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Multiple switching behavior in different display formats of multiple price lists. (2017). Musshoff, Oliver ; Bauermeister, Golo-Friedrich.
    In: Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:gadadp:260770.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. (Non-)Insurance Markets, Loss Size Manipulation and Competition - Experimental Evidence. (2016). Soetevent, Adriaan ; Hinloopen, Jeroen.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20160033.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. What can multiple price lists really tell us about risk preferences?. (2016). Lusk, Jayson ; Drichoutis, Andreas.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:53:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11166-016-9248-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. How to reveal people’s preferences: Comparing time consistency and predictive power of multiple price list risk elicitation methods. (2016). Csermely, Tamas ; Rabas, Alexander .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:53:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11166-016-9247-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods. (2016). Filippin, Antonio.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:19:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10683-015-9457-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes. (2016). Filippin, Antonio ; Crosetto, Paolo.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:62:y:2016:i:11:p:3138-3160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes. (2016). Filippin, Antonio ; Crosetto, Paolo.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01356905.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. (Non-)Insurance Markets, Loss Size Manipulation and Competition. (2016). Soetevent, Adriaan ; Hinloopen, Jeroen.
    In: Research Report.
    RePEc:gro:rugsom:16009-eef.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda. (2016). Musshoff, Oliver ; Ihli, Hanna Julia ; Chiputwa, Brian.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:235193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. RISK ATTITUDE AND INCONSISTENCIES - DOES THE CHOICE OF DISPLAY FORMAT AND RISK ELICITATION METHOD INFLUENCE THE OUTCOMES?. (2016). Musshoff, Oliver ; Bauermeister, Golo-Friedrich.
    In: 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016.
    RePEc:ags:gewi16:244764.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Risk attitudes of farmers, foresters and students: An experimental multimethod comparison. (2016). Musshoff, Oliver ; Sauter, Philipp ; Hermann, Daniel.
    In: 2016 Conference (60th), February 2-5, 2016, Canberra, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare16:235515.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Risk Aversion and Inconsistencies - Does the Choice of Risk Elicitation Method and Display Format Influence the Outcomes?. (2016). Musshoff, Oliver ; Bauermeister, Golo .
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:235348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Risk attitudes of foresters, farmers and students: An experimental multimethod comparison. (2015). Musshoff, Oliver ; Sauter, Philipp ; Hermann, Daniel.
    In: DARE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:daredp:1514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Skewness seeking: risk loving, optimism or overweighting of small probabilities?. (2015). Santos-Pinto, Luis ; Mata, José ; Astebro, Thomas.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:78:y:2015:i:2:p:189-208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Measuring Risk Aversion with Lists: A New Bias. (2015). Silvestre, Joaquim ; Antoni Bosch-Domènech, .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:634.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Quantum decision making by social agents. (2015). Yukalov, V. I. ; Sornette, D..
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1202.4918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Eliciting risk attitudes -- how to avoid mean and variance bias in Holt-and-Laury lotteries. (2014). Musshoff, Oliver ; Hirschauer, Norbert ; Gruener, Sven ; Maart-Noelck, Syster C..
    In: Applied Economics Letters.
    RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:21:y:2014:i:1:p:35-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes. (2014). Filippin, Antonio ; Crosetto, Paolo.
    In: Departmental Working Papers.
    RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2014-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Joint measurement of risk aversion, prudence, and temperance. (2014). Wiesen, Daniel ; Ebert, Sebastian.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:48:y:2014:i:3:p:231-252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes. (2014). Filippin, Antonio ; Crosetto, Paolo.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8184.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Shirking, Monitoring, and Risk Aversion. (2014). Jung, SeEun ; Houngbedji, Kenneth.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00965532.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Shirking, Monitoring, and Risk Aversion. (2014). Jung, SeEun ; Houngbedji, Kenneth.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-00965532.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. (2014). Filippin, Antonio ; Crosetto, Paolo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gbl:wpaper:2014-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Risk Attitudes and Shirking on the Quality of Work under Monitoring: Evidence from a Real-Effort Task Experiment. (2014). Jung, SeEun ; Houngbedji, Kenneth.
    In: THEMA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ema:worpap:2014-26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Manipulating decision making of typical agents. (2014). Yukalov, V. I. ; Sornette, D..
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1409.0636.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Measuring the risk attitude of decision-makers: are there differences between groups of methods and persons?. (2014). Musshoff, Oliver ; Maart-Noelck, Syster C.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:262407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Measuring risk aversion with lists: a new bias. (2013). Silvestre, Joaquim ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:75:y:2013:i:4:p:465-496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Matter? Evidence from Rural Uganda. (2013). Musshoff, Oliver ; Ihli, Hanna Julia ; Chiputwa, Brian.
    In: GlobalFood Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:gagfdp:158146.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Patient Preferences and Treatment Thresholds under Diagnostic Risk: An Economic Laboratory Experiment. (2012). Mayrhofer, Thomas ; Krieger, Miriam.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2012 (Goettingen): New Approaches and Challenges for the Labor Market of the 21st Century.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc12:62033.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Patient Preferences and Treatment Thresholds under Diagnostic Risk – An Economic Laboratory Experiment. (2012). Mayrhofer, Thomas ; Krieger, Miriam.
    In: Ruhr Economic Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:rwirep:321.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Measuring risk aversion with lists: A new bias. (2012). Silvestre, Joaquim ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:1318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Patient Preferences and Treatment Thresholds under Diagnostic Risk – An Economic Laboratory Experiment. (2012). Krieger, Miriam.
    In: Ruhr Economic Papers.
    RePEc:rwi:repape:0321.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Measuring risk aversion with lists: A new bias. (2012). Silvestre, Joaquim ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:88.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Measuring risk aversion with lists: A new bias. (2012). Silvestre, Joaquim ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:239.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Measuring risk aversion with lists: A new bias. (2012). Silvestre, Joaquim ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:12-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Measuring risk aversion with lists: A new bias. (2012). Silvestre, Joaquim ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:12-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. ERMITTLUNG DER INDIVIDUELLEN RISIKOEINSTELLUNG: VERGLEICH VERSCHIEDENER METHODEN UND PERSONENGRUPPEN. (2012). Musshoff, Oliver.
    In: 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012.
    RePEc:ags:gewi12:137384.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. The Impact of Price Floors -A Real Options Based Experimental Approach-. (2012). Musshoff, Oliver ; Maart, Syster Christin ; Maack, Moritz .
    In: 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare12:124328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-20 00:11:55 || Missing content? Let us know