Abdellaoui, M., Driouchi, A., & L’Haridon, O. (2011). Risk aversion elicitation: Reconciling tractability and bias minimization. Theory and Decision, 71(1), 63–80.
Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2016). Deciding for others reduces loss aversion. Management Science, 62(1), 29–36.
Bateman, I., & Munro, A. (2005). An experiment on risky choice amongst households. The Economic Journal, 115(March), C176–C189.
Binswanger, H. P. (1981). Attitudes toward risk: Theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. Economic Journal, 91(364), 867–890.
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2010). Risk taking and social comparison: A comment on “Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United Statesâ€. American Economic Review, 100(1), 628–633.
Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., & Stauf, J. (2015). Social responsibility promotes conservative risk behavior. European Economic Review, 74, 109–127.
Bougheas, S., Nieboer, J., & Sefton, M. (2013). Risk-taking in social settings: Group and peer effects. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 92, 273–283.
Bramoullé, Y., & Treich, N. (2009). Can uncertainty alleviate the commons problem? Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(5), 1042–1067.
Brocket, P. L., & Golden, L. L. (1987). A class of utility functions containing all the common utility functions. Management Science, 33(8), 955–964.
- Caballé, J., & Pomansky, A. (1996). Mixed risk aversion. Journal of Economic Theory, 71(2), 485–513.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carroll, C. D., & Kimball, M. S. (2008). Precautionary savings and precautionary wealth. In N. S. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). London: MacMillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), 1579–1601.
Cohen, M., Jaffray, J.-Y., & Said, T. (1987). Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and uncertainty for gains and losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 1–22.
Cooper, D. J., & Rege, M. (2011). Misery loves company: Social regret and social interaction effects in choices under risk and uncertainty. Games and Economic Behavior, 73(1), 91–110.
Cox, J. C., Sadiraj, V., & Schmidt, U. (2015). Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk. Experimental Economics, 18(2), 215–250.
Crainich, D., & Eeckhoudt, L. (2008). On the intensity of downside risk aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36(3), 267–276.
Crainich, D., Eeckhoudt, L., & Trannoy, A. (2013). Even (mixed) risk-lovers are prudent. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1529–1535.
Crawford, V. (1998). A survey of experiments on communication via cheap talk. Journal of Economic Theory, 78(2), 286–298.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
Cubitt, R., Starmer, R., & Sugden, R. (1998). On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experimental Economics, 1(2), 115–131.
Deck, C., & Schlesinger, H. (2010). Exploring higher order risk effects. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1403–1420.
Deck, C., & Schlesinger, H. (2014). Consistency of higher order risk preferences. Econometrica, 82(5), 1913–1943.
Deck, C., & Schlesinger, H. (2016). On the robustness of higher order risk preferences. Working paper.
Ebert, S. (2013). Even (mixed) risk-lovers are prudent: Comment. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1536–1537.
- Ebert, S., & van de Kuilen, G. (2015). Measuring multivariate risk preferences. Working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ebert, S., & Wiesen, D. (2011). Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. Management Science, 57(7), 1334–1349.
Ebert, S., & Wiesen, D. (2014). Joint measurement of risk aversion, prudence, and temperance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48(3), 231–252.
- Eeckhoudt, L. (2002). Risk and medical decision making. Boston: Kluwer.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Eeckhoudt, L., & Schlesinger, H. (2006). Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review, 96(1), 280–289.
- Eijkelenbloom, G., & Vostroknutov, A. (2016). The impact of the degree of responsibility and mutual decision making on choices under risk. Working paper, Maastricht University and University of Trento.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Embrey, M., Hyndman, K. B., & Riedl, A. (2016). Bargaining with a residual claimant: An experimental study. Working paper.
Eriksen, K. W., & Kvaloy, O. (2010). Myopic investment management. Review of Finance, 14(3), 521–542.
Esö, P., & White, L. (2004). Precautionary bidding in auctions. Econometrica, 72(1), 77–92.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.
Felder, S., & Mayrhofer, T. (2014). Risk preferences: Consequences for test and treatment thresholds and optimal cutoffs. Medical Decision Making, 34(1), 33–41.
Felder, S., & Mayrhofer, T. (2017). Medical decision making: A health economic primer (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Fischbacher, U. (2007). Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.
Geyer, J. (2011). The effect of health and employment risks on precautionary savings. Discussion papers of DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
Gioia, F. (2017). Peer effects on risk behaviour: the importance of group identity. Experimental Economics, 20(1), 100–129.
Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 631–645.
Gollier, C., & Pratt, J. W. (1996). Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica, 64(5), 1109–1123.
Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In: K. Kremer & V. Macho (Eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen. Bericht 63. Gesellschaft für wissenschafltiche Datenverarbeitung.
Haering, A., Heinrich, T., & Mayrhofer, T. (2017). Exploring the consistency of higher-order risk preferences. Ruhr Economic Papers No. 688.
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.
Humphrey, S. J., & Renner, E. (2011). The social costs of responsibility. CeDEx discussion paper series.
- Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141–1151.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kimball, M. S. (1990). Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 58(1), 53–73.
- Kimball, M. S. (1992). Precautionary motives for holding assets. In P. Newman, M. Milgate, & J. Falwell (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of money and finance. London: MacMillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kocher, M. G., Pahlke, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2015). An experimental study of precautionary bidding. European Economic Review, 78, 27–38.
Krieger, M., & Mayrhofer, T. (2012). Patient preferences and treatment thresholds under diagnostic risk: An economic laboratory experiment. Ruhr Economic Papers No. 321.
Krieger, M., & Mayrhofer, T. (2017). Prudence and prevention: An economic laboratory experiment. Applied Economics Letters, 24(1), 19–24.
Lahno, A. M., & Serra-Garcia, M. (2015). Peer effects in risk taking: Envy or conformity? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 50, 73–95.
Leland, H. E. (1968). Saving and uncertainty: The precautionary demand for saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(3), 465–473.
- Maier, J., & Rüger, M. (2012). Experimental evidence on higher-order risk preferences with real monetary losses. Working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mayrhofer, T. (2017). Skewed background risks and higher-order risk preferences: Prudent versus temperate behavior. Applied Economics Letters, 24(5), 338–341.
Noussair, C. N., Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2014). Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 81(1), 325–355.
Pahlke, J., Strasser, S., & Vieider, F. M. (2015). Responsibility effects in decision making under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51, 125–146.
Pollmann, M. H., Potters, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2014). Risk taking by agents: The role of ex-ante and ex-post accountability. Economics Letters, 123(3), 387–390.
Sandmo, A. (1970). The effect of uncertainty on saving decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 37(3), 353–360.
Shupp, R. S., & Williams, A. W. (2008). Risk preference differentials of small groups and individuals. The Economic Journal, 118(January), 258–283.
- Stoner, J. A. F. (1961). A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Industrial Management.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sutter, M. (2009). Individual behavior and group membership: Comment. American Economic Review, 99, 2247–2257.
- Tarazona-Gómez, M. (2004). Are individuals prudent? An experimental approach using lottery choices. Working paper, Laboratoire d’Economie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Trautmann, S. T., & Vieider, F. M. (2012). Social influences on risk attitudes: Applications in economics. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sand, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory. Amsterdam: Springer.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.
Vieider, F. M., Villegas-Palacio, C., Martinsson, P., & MejÃa, M. (2016). Risk taking for oneself and others: A structural model approach. Economic Inquiry, 54(2), 879–894.
White, L. (2008). Prudence in bargaining: The effect of uncertainty on bargaining outcomes. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 211–231.
Yechiam, E., Druyan, M., & Ert, E. (2008). Observing others’ behavior and risk taking in decisions from experience. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(7), 493.