- Abdellaoui, M., Li, C., Wakker, P., & Wu, G. (2020). A defense of prospect theory in Bernheim and Sprenger’s experiment. Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Agranov, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2017). Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. Journal of Political Economy, 125(1), 40–68.
- Agranov, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2023). Ranges of preferences and randomization. Review of Economics and Statistics, Forthcoming.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Apesteguia, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2018). Monotone stochastic choice models: The case of risk and time preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 126(1), 74–106.
Arts, S., Ong, Q., & Qiu, J. (2020). Measuring subjective decision confidence. MPRA Paper 106811, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Aydogan, I., & Gao, Y. (2020). Experience and rationality under risk: Re-examining the impact of sampling experience. Experimental Economics, 23(4), 1100–1128.
Butler, D. J., & Loomes, G. C. (2007). Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 97(1), 277–297.
Butler, D., & Loomes, G. (2011). Imprecision as an account of violations of independence and betweenness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80(3), 511–522.
Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-roduction framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7–42.
Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Dillenberger, D., & Ortoleva, P. (2015). Cautious expected utility and the certainty effect. Econometrica, 83(2), 693–728.
Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Dillenberger, D., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2019). Deliberately stochastic. American Economic Review, 109(7), 2425–2445.
Chew, S. H. (1983). A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox. Econometrica, 51(4), 1065–1092.
- Chew, S. H. (1989). Axiomatic utility theories with the betweenness property. Annals of Operations Research, 19(1), 273–298.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chew, S. H., Miao, B., & Zhong, S. (2017). Partial ambiguity. Econometrica, 85(4), 1239–1260.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cohen, M., Jaffray, J.-Y., & Said, T. (1987). Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 1–22.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cubitt, R., Kopsacheilis, O., & Starmer, C. (2022). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the description—experience gap. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 65(2), 105–137.
Cubitt, R., Navarro-Martinez, D., & Starmer, C. (2015). On preference imprecision. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 50, 1–34.
Cubitt, R., van de Kuilen, G., & Mukerji, S. (2020). Discriminating between models of ambiguity attitude: A qualitative test. Journal of the European Economic Association, 18(2), 708–749.
Dekel, E. (1986). An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom. Journal of Economic Theory, 40(2), 304–318.
Dubourg, W. R., Jones-Lee, M. W., & Loomes, G. (1994). Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 115–133.
Dubourg, W. R., Jones-Lee, M. W., & Loomes, G. (1997). Imprecise preferences and survey design in contingent valuation. Economica, 64(256), 681–702.
Eliashberg, J., & Hauser, J. (1985). A measurement error approach for modeling consumer risk preference. Management Science, 31(1), 1–25.
Enke, B., & Graeber, T. (2021). Cognitive uncertainty in intertemporal choice. Working paper, Harvard University.
- Enke, B., & Graeber, T. (2023). Cognitive uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Forthcoming.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fudenberg, D., & Puri, I. (2021). Evaluating and extending theories of choice under risk. Working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fudenberg, D., Iijima, R., & Strzalecki, T. (2015). Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility. Econometrica, 83(6), 2371–2409.
Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2), 141–153.
Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114–125.
Gul, F., & Pesendorfer, W. (2006). Random expected utility. Econometrica, 74(1), 121–146.
Halevy, Y. (2007). Ellsberg revisited: An experimental study. Econometrica, 75(2), 503–536.
- Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534–539.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
Khaw, M. W., Li, Z., & Woodford, M. (2021). Cognitive imprecision and small stakes risk aversion. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(4), 1979–2013.
Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., & Mukerji, S. (2005). A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica, 73(6), 1849–1892.
Loomes, G., & Pogrebna, G. (2017). Do preference reversals disappear when we allow for probabilistic choice? Management Science, 63(1), 166–184.
Machina, M. J. (1985). Stochastic choice functions generated from deterministic preferences over lotteries. Economic Journal, 95(379), 575–94.
Miao, B., & Zhong, S. (2018). Probabilistic social preference: How Machina’s mom randomizes her choice. Economic Theory, 65(1), 1–24.
Mosteller, F., & Nogee, P. (1951). An experimental measurement of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 59(5), 371–404.
Myagkov, M., & Plott, C. R. (1997). Exchange economies and loss exposure: Experiments exploring prospect theory and competitive equilibria in market environments. American Economic Review, 87(5), 801–828.
Ong, Q., & Qiu, J. (2023). Paying for randomization and indecisiveness. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 67, 45–72.
Plott, C. R., & Zeiler, K. (2005). The willingness to pay - willingness to accept gap, the “endowment effect,’’ subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations. American Economic Review, 95(3), 530–545.
Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 323–343.
Rubinstein, A. (2002). Irrational diversification in multiple decision problems. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1369–1378.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
van de Kuilen, G. (2009). Subjective probability weighting and the discovered preference hypothesis. Theory and Decision, 67, 1–22.
van de Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. (2006). Learning in the Allais paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33, 155–164.
- Wulff, D. U., Mergenthaler-Canseco, M., & Hertwig, R. (2018). A meta-analytic review of two modes of learning and the description-experience gap. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 140–176.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zizzo, D. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 13(1), 75–98.