create a website

Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on Publons. (2021). Sivertsen, Gunnar ; Huang, Ying ; Shang, Yuanyuan ; Zhang, Lin.
In: SocArXiv.
RePEc:osf:socarx:4z6w8_v1.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 89

References cited by this document

Cocites: 45

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79(3), 517-539.

  2. Addis, E., & Villa, P. (2003). The Editorial boards of Italian economics journals: women, gender, and social networking. Feminist Economics, 9(1), 75-91.

  3. Adler, E., Hobbs, A., Dhaliwal, G., & Babik, J. M. (2020). Gender Differences in Authorship of Clinical Problem-Solving Articles. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 15(8), 475-478.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Amrein, K., Langmann, A., Fahrleitner-Pammer, A., Pieber, T. R., & Zollner-Schwetz, I. (2011). Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gender medicine, 8(6), 378-387.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Arruda, D., Bezerra, F., Neris, V., Rocha De Toro, P., & Wainera, J. (2009). Brazilian computer science research: Gender and regional distributions. Scientometrics, 79(3), 651-665.

  6. Association of percentile ranking with citation impact and productivity in a large cohort of de novo NIMH-funded R01 grants. Molecular psychiatry, 20(9), 1030-1036.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Baucom, R. S., Geraldes, A. M., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2019). Some perspective on Molecular Ecology perspectives: Are women being left out?. Molecular Ecology, 28(10):2451– 2455.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bendels, M.H., Müller, R., Brueggmann, D., & Groneberg, D. A. (2018). Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PloS ONE, 13(1), e0189136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bianchi, F., & Squazzoni, F. (2015). Is three better than one? simulating the effect of reviewer selection and behavior on the quality and efficiency of peer review. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. (pp.4081–4089).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Black, N., van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Smith, R., & Evans, S. (1998). What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? Jama, 280(3), 231-233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Borja, . (2015). Is there gender bias in the peer-review process in several Elsevier's marine journals? Mar Pollut Bull, 96(1-2), 1-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Bornmann, L., & Williams, R. (2017). Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 788-799.

  13. Bradshaw, C. J., & Courchamp, F. (2018). Gender bias when assessing recommended ecology articles. Rethinking Ecology, 3, 1-12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Buckley, H. L., Sciligo, A. R., Adair, K. L., Case, B. S., & Monks, J. M. (2014). Is there gender bias in reviewer selection and publication success rates for the New Zealand Journal of Ecology? New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 38(2),335-339.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (2007). Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Upping the numbers. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Cameron, E. Z., Gray, M. E., & White, A. M. (2013). Is publication rate an equal opportunity metric? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(1), 7-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Charlin, L., & Zemel, R. (2013). The Toronto paper matching system: an automated paperreviewer assignment system. In International Conference on MachineLearning (ICML) 2013 Workshop on Peer Reviewing and Publishing Models.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Cho, A.H., Johnson, S.A., Schuman, C.E., Adler, J.M., Gonzalez, O., Graves, S.J., et al. (2014) Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management. PeerJ, 2, e542.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Clarivate Analytics. (2018). 2018 global state of peer review. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14322/publons.GSPR2018. Accessed 13 March 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Clark, J., & Horton, R. (2019). What is The Lancet doing about gender and diversity? The Lancet, 393(10171), 508-510.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Cole, J., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and Change in Patterns of Publication Among Men and Women Scientists. In: Steinkamp, MW, Maehr, M. (Eds.): Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Greenwich: JAI Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Débarre, F., Rode, N., & Ugelvig, L. (2018). Gender equity at scientific events. Evolution Letters, 2(3), 148-158.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Demarest, B., Freeman, G., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2014). The reviewer in the mirror: examining gendered and ethnicized notions of reciprocity in peer review. Scientometrics, 101(1), 717-735.

  24. Ebenstein, A. (2014). Patrilocality and missing women. Working Paper, Jerusalem: Hebrew University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Elsevier (2017). Gender in the global research landscape. Amsterdam, Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/resource-library/ty/gender-in-theglobal -research-landscape. Accessed 13 March 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Elsevier. (2020). The Researcher Journey Through a Gender Lens. Retrieved from: https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/resource-library/gender-report-2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Feramisco, J. D., Leitenberger, J. J., Redfern, S. I., Bian, A., Xie, X.-J., & Resneck Jr, J. S. (2009). A gender gap in the dermatology literature? Cross-sectional analysis of manuscript authorship trends in dermatology journals during 3 decades. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 60(1), 63-69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Fox, C. W., & Paine, C. T. (2019). Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution. Ecology and Evolution, 9(6), 35993619.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Fox, C. W., Burns, C. S., & Meyer, J. A. (2016). Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 30(1), 140-153.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Fox, C. W., Burns, C. S., Muncy, A. D., & Meyer, J. A. (2017). Author‐suggested reviewers: Gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 31(1), 270-280.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Fox, C. W., Duffy, M. A., Fairbairn, D. J., & Meyer, J. A. (2019). Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution. Ecology and Evolution, 9(24), 13636-13649.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Fox, C. W., Ritchey, J. P., & Paine, C. T. (2018). Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography. Ecology and Evolution, 8(23), 11492-11507.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Ghiasi, G., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2015). On the compliance of women engineers with a gendered scientific system. PloS ONE, 10(12), e0145931.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Grod, O. N., Budden, A. E., Tregenza, T., Koricheva, J., Leimu, R., Aarssen, L. W., & Lortie, C. J. (2008). Systematic variation in reviewer practice according to country and gender in the field of ecology and evolution. PloS ONE, 3(9), e3202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Helmer, M., Schottdorf, M., Neef, A., & Battaglia, D. (2017). Gender bias in scholarly peer review. Elife, 6, e21718.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS biology, 16(4), e2004956.

  37. Huang, J., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 117(9), 4609-4616.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Jayachandran, S. (2015). The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. Economics, 7(1), 63-88.

  39. Jubb, M. (2016). Peer review: The current landscape and future trends. Learned Publishing, 29, 13–21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Käfer, J., Betancourt, A., Villain, A. S., Fernandez, M., Vignal, C., Marais, G., & Tenaillon, M. I. (2018). Progress and Prospects in Gender Visibility at SMBE Annual Meetings. Genome biology and evolution, 10(3), 901–908.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Kaltman, J.R., Evans, F.J., Danthi, N.S., Wu, C.O., DiMichele, D.M. & Lauer, M.S. (2014) Prior publication productivity, grand percentile rank-ing, and topic-normalized citation impact of NHLBI Cardiovascular R01 Grants. Circulation Research, 115, 617–624.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Karimi, F., Wagner, C., Lemmerich, F., Jadidi, M., & Strohmaier, M. (2016). Inferring gender from names on the web: A comparative evaluation of gender detection methods. In Proceedings of the 25th International conference companion on World Wide Web (pp. 53-54).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. (2013). The Matilda effect in science communication: an experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science communication, 35(5), 603-625.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Knowles, R., Carroll, J., & Dredze, M. (2016). Demographer: Extremely simple name demographics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science (pp.108–113).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Kovanis, M., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P., & Trinquart, L. (2016). The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: Strong imbalance in the collective enterprise. PloS ONE, 11(11), e0166387.

  46. Krawczyk, M., & Smyk, M. (2016). Author‫׳‬ s gender affects rating of academic articles: Evidence from an incentivized, deception-free laboratory experiment. European Economic Review, 90, 326-335.

  47. Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature News, 504(7479), 211-213.

  48. Lerback, J., & Hanson, B. (2017). Journals invite too few women to referee. Nature News, 541(7638), 455-457.

  49. Liu, L., Wang, Y., Sinatra, R., Giles, C. L., Song, C., & Wang, D. (2018). Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. Nature, 559(7714), 396-399.

  50. Liu, W., & Ruths, D. (2013). What’s in a name? using first names as features for gender inference in twitter. In Analyzing Microtext: 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Liu, X., Suel, T., & Memon, N. (2014). A robust model for paper reviewer assignment. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on recommender systems (pp.25–32).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Mauleón, E., Hillán, L., Moreno, L., Gómez, I., & Bordons, M. (2013). Assessing gender balance among journal authors and editorial board members. Scientometrics, 95(1), 87114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Mendoza-Denton, R., C. Patt, A. Fisher, A. Eppig, I. Young, A. Smith, M. A. Richards. (2017). Differences in STEM doctoral publication by ethnicity, gender and academic field at a large public research university. PLoS ONE. 12(4), e0174296.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  56. Mihaljević-Brandt, H., Santamaría, L., & Tullney, M. (2016). The effect of gender in the publication patterns in mathematics. PloS ONE, 11(10), e0165367.

  57. Milojević, S. (2012). How are academic age, productivity and collaboration related to citing behavior of researchers? PloS ONE, 7(11), e49176.

  58. Morton, M. J., & Sonnad, S. S. (2007). Women on professional society and journal editorial boards. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99(7), 764-771.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Murray, D., Siler, K., Larivière, V., Chan, W. M., Collings, A. M., Raymond, J., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2019). Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review. BioRxiv, 400515.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Narasimhan, S. D. (2019). A commitment to gender diversity in peer review. Cell, 179(1), 1-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. O'Connor, E. E., Chen, P., Weston, B., Anderson, R., Zeffiro, T., Ahmed, A., & Zeffiro, T. A. (2018). Gender trends in academic radiology publication in the United States revisited.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Ortega, J. L. (2017). Are peer-review activities related to reviewer bibliometric performance? A scientometric analysis of Publons. Scientometrics, 112(2), 947-962.

  63. Publons. (2018). Report for Publons State of Peer Review 2018 Survey. Retrieved from https://publons.com/community/gspr#open-elq-form-slider-DLGSPR. Accessed 13 March 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. Reingewertz, Y., & Lutmar, C. (2018). Academic in-group bias: An empirical examination of the link between author and journal affiliation. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 74-86.

  65. Ross, E. (2017). Gender bias distorts peer review across fields. Nature News. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.21685. Accessed 13 March 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  66. Rørstad, K., & Aksnes, D. W. (2015). Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position–A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. Journal of Informetrics, 9(2), 317-333.

  67. Santamaría, L., & Mihaljević, H. (2018). Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services. PeerJ Computer Science, 4, e156.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Schmaling, K. B., & Blume, A. W. (2017). Gender differences in providing peer review to two behavioural science journals, 2006–2015. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 221-225.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Shamsi, A. (2020). Gender of Highly Cited Researchers focused on the cross-filed category. Gaceta Sanitaria.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Solans M, Adam P, Vizcaino E, Radó N, Ovseiko P Güell E, et al. (2020). Women’s advancement and leadership in the biomedical research centres of Catalonia II: bringing about change. Barcelona: Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  71. Sotudeh, H., Dehdarirad, T., & Freer, J. (2018). Gender differences in scientific productivity and visibility in core neurosurgery journals: Citations and social media metrics. Research Evaluation, 27(3), 262-269.

  72. Steinberg, J. J., Skae, C., & Sampson, B. (2018). Gender gap, disparity, and inequality in peer review. The Lancet, 391(10140), 2602-2603.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Stoet, G., O’Connor, D. B., Conner, M., & Laws, K. R. (2013). Are women better than men at multi-tasking?. BMC Psychology, 1(1), 1-10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  74. Thurner, S., & Hanel, R. (2011). Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average. The European Physical Journal B, 84(4), 707-711.

  75. Tite, L., & Schroter, S. (2007). Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(1), 9-12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. United Nations Development Program. (2019). Human Development Report 2019. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). UNESCO science report, towards 2030: executive summary. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/unescosciencereport. Accessed 23 March 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  78. van Arensbergen, P., van der Weijden, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity, a persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3), 857-868.

  79. van Den Besselaar, P., & Sandström, U. (2016). Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study. Scientometrics, 106(1), 143-162.

  80. van Den Besselaar, P., & Sandström, U. (2017). Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact. PloS ONE, 12(8), e0183301.

  81. Walker, K. A. (2020). Females are first authors, sole authors, and reviewers of entomology publications significantly less often than males. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 113(3), 193-201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96(2), 529-560.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  83. West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PloS ONE, 8(7), e66212.

  84. Wickware, P. (1997). Along the leaky pipeline. Nature, 390(6656), 202-203.

  85. Willis, M. (2016). Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses. Learned Publishing, 29, 5–7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Wing, D. A., Benner, R. S., Petersen, R., Newcomb, R., & Scott, J. R. (2010). Differences in editorial board reviewer behavior based on gender. Journal of Women's Health, 19(10), 1919-1923.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. World Economic Forum. (2020). The global gender gap report 2020. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Zeina, M., Balston, A., Banerjee, A., & Woolf, K. (2020). Gender and ethnic differences in publication of BMJ letters to the editor: an observational study using machine learning. BMJ open, 10(12), e037269.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  89. Zeng, X. H. T., Duch, J., Sales-Pardo, M., Moreira, J. A., Radicchi, F., Ribeiro, H. V., et al. (2016). Differences in collaboration patterns across discipline, career stage, and gender. PLoS biology, 14(11), e1002573.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Gender of gender studies: examining regional and gender-based disparities in scholarly publications. (2024). Aggarwal, Shruti ; Varghese, Jeevan John ; Prakash, Arjun.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05084-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Why do sociologists on academic periphery willingly support bibliometric indicators?. (2024). Guba, Katerina.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04890-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Gender Pay Gap at the Early Stages of Academic Careers. (2024). Magda, Iga ; Feldy, Marzena ; Bieliski, Jacek ; Knapiska, Anna.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17063.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Analysis of the distribution of authorship by gender in scientific output: A global perspective. (2024). Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P ; Sanchez-Jimenez, Rodrigo ; Guerrero-Castillo, Pablo ; Halevi, Gali ; De-Moya, Felix.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:3:s1751157724000695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. On the lack of women researchers in the Middle East and North Africa. (2023). Lariviere, Vincent ; El-Ouahi, Jamal.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04768-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Gender imbalance in doctoral education: an analysis of the Spanish university system (1977–2021). (2023). Sanchez-Jimenez, Rodrigo ; Suarez-Figueroa, Mari Carmen ; Blazquez-Ochando, Manuel ; Barrasa-Rodriguez, Jesus ; Botezan, Iuliana.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04648-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Are female researchers more efficient? An analysis of gender in a Spanish technological university. (2023). Garca-Lvarez, Jose M ; Marti, Luisa ; Puertas, Rosa.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04844-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Research Productivity of Pakistani Female LIS Authors, 1977 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis. (2023). Khan, Muhammad Ajmal ; Mahmood, Khalid ; Adil, Hafiz Muhammad ; Altaf, Asif ; Iqbal, Abid ; Ahmad, Shakil ; Ur, Shafiq ; Siddique, Nadeem.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231207188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons. (2022). Shang, Yuanyuan ; Huang, Ying ; Zhang, Lin ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04209-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Knowledge Production: Analysing Gender- and Country-Dependent Factors in Research Topics through Term Communities. (2022). Bakshi-Hamm, Parminder.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:45-:d:981648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Gender Differences in Collaboration Patterns in Computer Science. (2022). Yamamoto, Josh ; Frachtenberg, Eitan.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:10-:d:757416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Diversity of success: measuring the scholarly performance diversity of tenured professors in the Israeli academia. (2021). Weinberger, Maor ; Zhitomirsky-Geffet, Maayan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03823-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council. (2021). Ruggieri, Roberta ; Pecoraro, Fabrizio ; Luzi, Daniela.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03802-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on Publons. (2021). Sivertsen, Gunnar ; Huang, Ying ; Shang, Yuanyuan ; Zhang, Lin.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:4z6w8_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on Publons. (2021). Shang, Yuanyuan ; Huang, Ying ; Zhang, Lin ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:4z6w8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Women in innovation processes as a solution to climate change: A systematic literature review and an agenda for future research. (2021). Leloarne-Lemaire, Severine ; Razgallah, Meriam ; Bertrand, Gael ; Kallmuenzer, Andreas ; Maalaoui, Adnane.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:164:y:2021:i:c:s004016252031266x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway. (2021). Abramo, Giovanni ; Aksnes, Dag W ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:2:s1751157721000158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. (2021). MADDI, ABDELGHANI ; Gingras, Yves.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:35:y:2021:i:5:p:1381-1404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Gender disparities in the field of economics. (2020). Song, Yinglu ; Yang, Sai ; Liu, Junwan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03627-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups. (2020). Traag, Vincent Antonio ; Squazzoni, Flaminio ; Akbaritabar, Aliakbar ; Caimo, Alberto.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:124:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03555-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. How do public investments in gender equality initiatives and publication patterns interrelate? The case of Germany. (2020). Buhrer, Susanne ; Frietsch, Rainer.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:79:y:2020:i:c:s0149718919304252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. How do public investments in gender equality initiatives and publication patterns interrelate? The case of Germany. (2020). Buhrer, Susanne ; Frietsch, Rainer.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:79:y:2020:i:c:s0149718919302022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Gender diversity in research teams and citation impact in Economics and Management. (2020). MADDI, ABDELGHANI ; Gingras, Yves.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2011.14823.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Gender discrimination in academic careers in Italy. (2019). Pasqua, Silvia ; Filandri, Marianna.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers.
    RePEc:uto:dipeco:201921.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The collaboration behavior of top scientists. (2019). Abramo, Giovanni ; di Costa, Flavia ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:118:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2970-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Gender and Academic Rank in the UK. (2019). SANTOS, Georgina ; van Phu, Stephanie Dang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3171-:d:237538.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. (2018). Mayer, Sabrina J.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2933-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Are scientific memes inherited differently from gendered authorship?. (2018). Fontainha, Elsa ; Araújo, Tanya ; Araujo, Tanya.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2903-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The trench warfare of gender discrimination: evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy. (2018). Meschitti, Viviana ; Marini, Giulio.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2696-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The conundrum of research productivity: a study on sociologists in Italy. (2018). Casnici, Niccolo ; Squazzoni, Flaminio ; Akbaritabar, Aliakbar.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:114:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2606-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification. (2018). Abramo, Giovanni ; di Costa, Flavia ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:114:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2529-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study. (2018). Soto, Patricia ; Lacueva, Graciela ; Bruce, Chrystal D ; Mellis, Birgit ; Wilson, Anne M ; Jayasekare, Rasitha.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0196338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The research activity of the current faculty of the Greek chemical engineering departments: a bibliometric study in national and international context. (2015). Kazakis, Nikolaos A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1523-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The evolution of female authorship in computing research. (2015). Caceres, Paloma ; Cavero, Jose Maria ; Cuesta, Carlos ; Vela, Belen ; Sierra-Alonso, Almudena .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1520-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Forty years of gender disparities in Russian science: a historical bibliometric analysis. (2015). Lariviere, Vincent ; Bouvier, Rebecca L ; Ni, Chaoqun ; Sugimoto, Cassidy R ; Paul-Hus, Adele ; Pislyakov, Vladimir.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1386-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Gender, beauty and support networks in academia: Evidence from a field experiment. (2015). Smyk, Magdalena ; Krawczyk, Michal.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00697.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance. (2014). Cioni, M ; Barabesi, L ; Pisani, C ; Baccini, A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1395-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The sex and ethnicity or national origins of researchers in astronomy and oncology in four countries, 2006–2007 and 2011–2012. (2014). Webber, Richard ; Roe, Philip ; Lewison, Grant.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:100:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1223-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Gender bias and explanation models for the phenomenon of women’s discriminations in research careers. (2013). Kretschmer, Theo.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:97:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1023-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?. (2012). Arensbergen, Pleun ; Besselaar, Peter ; van der Weijden, Inge.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:93:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0712-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Research productivity in education and psychology in the Philippines and comparison with ASEAN countries. (2012). Vinluan, Lorelei R.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:91:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0496-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Life sciences research in Venezuela. (2012). Requena, Jaime ; Vargas, Domingo ; Caputo, Carlo .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:90:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0548-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Female researchers in Russia: have they become more visible?. (2011). Markusova, Valentina ; Lewison, Grant.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:89:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0435-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. National research assessment exercises: a measure of the distortion of performance rankings when labor input is treated as uniform. (2010). Solazzi, Marco ; Abramo, Giovanni ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0164-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity. (2009). Abramo, Giovanni ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea ; Caprasecca, Alessandro .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:81:y:2009:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-008-2131-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 23:49:09 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.