create a website

Why do sociologists on academic periphery willingly support bibliometric indicators?. (2024). Guba, Katerina.
In: Scientometrics.
RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04890-4.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 68

References cited by this document

Cocites: 45

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79, 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2046-8 .

  2. Akbaritabar, A., Casnici, N., & Squazzoni, F. (2018). The conundrum of research productivity: A study on sociologists in Italy. Scientometrics, 114, 859–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2606-5 .

  3. Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2016). (Un)Conditional surrender? Why do professionals willingly comply with managerialism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2015-0221 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Andersen, L. B., & Pallesen, T. (2008). Not just for the money? How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11, 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887889 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison. Research Policy, 39, 822–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003 .

  6. Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G., & Petrovich, E. (2019). Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis. PLoS ONE, 14(9), e0221212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199031 .

  7. Berman, E. P., & Hirschman, D. (2018). The sociology of quantification: Where are we now? Contemporary Sociology, 47, 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118767649 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Biagioli, M., & Lippman, A. (Eds.) (2020). Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research. MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Biagioli, M., Kenney, M., Martin, B. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2019). Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: A reassessment. Research Policy, 48(2), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.025 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Broz, L., & Stöckelová, T. (2018). The culture of orphaned texts: Academic books in a performance-based evaluation system. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70, 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2018-0063 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Buela-Casal, G., & Zych, I. (2012). What do the scientists think about the impact factor? Scientometrics, 92(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0676-y .

  12. Butler, L. (2003). Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas. Research Evaluation, 12, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154403781776780 .

  13. Chun, H., & Sauder, M. (2022). The logic of quantification: Institutionalizing numerical thinking. Theory and Society, 51, 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09453-1 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Clark, B. R. (1986). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. University of California Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1564–1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21348 .

  16. Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menendez, L. (2021). What should be rewarded? Gender and evaluation criteria for tenure and promotion. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101196.

  17. de Rijcke, S., Wouters, P., Rushforth, A., Franssen, T., & Hammarfelt, B. (2015). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—A literature review. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Espeland, W. N., Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. (2016). Engines of anxiety: Academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. Russell Sage Foundation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Etzioni, A. (1975). Comparative analysis of complex organizations, Revised Edition. Simon and Schuster.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56, 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Foster, J. G., Rzhetsky, A., & Evans, J. A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 875–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415601618 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Gantman, E. R., & Fernández Rodríguez, C. J. (2016). Literature segmentation in management and organization studies: The case of Spanish-speaking countries (2000–10). Research Evaluation, 25, 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv031 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing and Management, 35, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00028-4 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Gläser, J. (2004). Why are the most influential books in Australian sociology not necessarily the most highly cited ones? Journal of Sociology, 40, 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783304046370 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Grančay, M., Vveinhardt, J., & Šumilo, Ē. (2017). Publish or perish: How Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015. Scientometrics, 111, 1813–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2332-z .

  26. Guba, K., & Tsivinskaya, A. (2023). Expert judgments versus publication-based metrics: Do the two methods produce identical results in measuring academic reputation? Journal of Documentation, 79(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2022-0039 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Hallonsten, O. (2022). Introduction to special section: Causes and consequences of the current evaluation regime in (academic) science. Social Science Information, 61(4), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184231151610 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Hammarfelt, B., & Haddow, G. (2018). Conflicting measures and values: How humanities scholars in Australia and Sweden use and react to bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69, 924–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24043 .

  29. Hammarfelt, B., & Rushforth, A. D. (2017). Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation. Research Evaluation, 26, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx018 .

  30. Hammarfelt, B., Nelhans, G., Eklund, P., & Åström, F. (2016). The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities. Research Evaluation, 25, 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv040 .

  31. Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007 .

  32. Hokka, J. (2019). What counts as ‘good sociology’? Conflicting discourses on legitimate sociology in Finland and Sweden. Acta Sociologica, 62, 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699318813422 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Honig, B., & Bedi, A. (2012). The fox in the hen house: A critical examination of plagiarism among members of the Academy of Management. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11, 101–123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0084 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Horowitz, M., Haynor, A., & Kickham, K. (2018). Sociology’s sacred victims and the politics of knowledge: Moral foundations theory and disciplinary controversies. The American Sociologist, 49, 459–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9381-5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Kalfa, S., Wilkinson, A., & Gollan, P. J. (2018). The academic game: Compliance and resistance in universities. Work, Employment and Society, 32, 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017017695043 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Kanchan, T., & Krishan, K. (2019). The Leiden Manifesto and research assessment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0012-2 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Kassian, A., & Melikhova, L. (2019). Russian Science Citation Index on the WoS platform: A critical assessment. Journal of Documentation, 75(5), 1162–1168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2019-0033 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Krzeski, J., Szadkowski, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2022). Creating evaluative homogeneity: Experience of constructing a national journal ranking. Research Evaluation, 31, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac011 .

  39. Kuzʹminov, J. I., & Judkevič, M. M. (2022). Higher education in Russia. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Langfeldt, L., Reymert, I., & Aksnes, D. W. (2021). The role of metrics in peer assessments. Research Evaluation, 30, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa032 .

  42. Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research policy and academic performativity: Compliance, contestation and complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1162–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.833025 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Leydesdorff, L., Wouters, P., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Professional and citizen bibliometrics: Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—A state-of-the-art report. Scientometrics, 109, 2129–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2150-8 .

  44. Long, J. S. (1990). The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces, 68, 1297–1316. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/68.4.1297 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Lovakov, A., Panova, A., & Yudkevich, M. (2022). Global visibility of nationally published research output: The case of the post-Soviet region. Scientometrics, 127, 2643–2659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04326-5 .

  46. Marina, T., & Sterligov, I. (2021). Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level. Scientometrics, 126, 5019–5077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03899-x .

  47. Moskaleva, O., Pislyakov, V., Sterligov, I., & Akoev, M. (2018). Russian Index of Science Citation: Overview and review. Scientometrics, 116(1), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2758-y .

  48. Najman, J. M., & Hewitt, B. (2003). The validity of publication and citation counts for Sociology and other selected disciplines. Journal of Sociology, 39, 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/144078330303900106 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Önder, Ç., & Erdil, S. E. (2017). Opportunities and opportunism: Publication outlet selection under pressure to increase research productivity. Research Evaluation, 26, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx006 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Pajić, D. (2015). Globalization of the social sciences in Eastern Europe: Genuine breakthrough or a slippery slope of the research evaluation practice? Scientometrics, 102, 2131–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1510-5 .

  51. Pardo-Guerra, J. P. (2022). The quantified scholar: How research evaluations transformed the British social sciences. Columbia University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  52. Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R. J. (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x .

  53. Petrovich, E. (2022). Bibliometrics in Press. Representations and uses of bibliometric indicators in the Italian daily newspapers. Scientometrics, 127(5), 2195–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04341-6 .

  54. Pölönen, J., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., Sivertsen, G., & Engels, T. C. (2021). National lists of scholarly publication channels: An overview and recommendations for their construction and maintenance. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(1), 50–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis2021-0004 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Prasad, M. (2021). Pragmatism as problem solving. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 7, 237802312199399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023121993991 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Reymert, I., Jungblut, J., & Borlaug, S. B. (2021). Are evaluative cultures national or global? A cross-national study on evaluative cultures in academic recruitment processes in Europe. Higher Education, 82, 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00659-3 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Scarpa, F., Bianco, V., & Tagliafico, L. A. (2018). The impact of the National Assessment Exercises on self-citation rate and publication venue: An empirical investigation on the engineering academic sector in Italy. Scientometrics, 117(2), 997–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2913-5 .

  58. Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Malighetti, P. (2019). Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. Research Policy, 48(2), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004 .

  59. Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9%3c628:AID-ASI5%3e3.0.CO;2-0 .

  60. Siler, K., & Larivière, V. (2022). Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation. Research Policy, 51, 104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608 .

  61. Söderlind, J., & Geschwind, L. (2020). Disciplinary differences in academics’ perceptions of performance measurement at Nordic universities. Higher Education Governance and Policy, 1(1), 18–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Sokolov, M. (2019). The sources of academic localism and globalism in Russian sociology: The choice of professional ideologies and occupational niches among social scientists. Current Sociology, 67, 818–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118811392 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Sokolov, M. (2021). Can Russian research policy be called neoliberal? A study in the comparative sociology of quantification. Europe-Asia Studies, 73, 989–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1902945 .

  64. Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2019). What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018. Scientometrics, 121, 1635–1684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03243-4 .

  65. Townley, B. (1997). The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18, 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800204 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Turner, J. H. (2019). The more American sociology seeks to become a politically-relevant discipline, the more irrelevant it becomes to solving societal Problems. The American Sociologist, 50, 456–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-09420-5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Waltman, L. (2018). Responsible metrics: One size doesn’t fit all. In STI 2018 conference proceedings, 2018 (pp. 526–531).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Wieczorek, O., Münch, R., & Schubert, D. (2022). All power to the reviewers: British sociology under two-level supervision of the Research Excellence Framework. Social Science Information, 61(4), 481–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184231158210 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Gender of gender studies: examining regional and gender-based disparities in scholarly publications. (2024). Aggarwal, Shruti ; Varghese, Jeevan John ; Prakash, Arjun.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05084-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Why do sociologists on academic periphery willingly support bibliometric indicators?. (2024). Guba, Katerina.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04890-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Gender Pay Gap at the Early Stages of Academic Careers. (2024). Magda, Iga ; Feldy, Marzena ; Bieliski, Jacek ; Knapiska, Anna.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17063.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Analysis of the distribution of authorship by gender in scientific output: A global perspective. (2024). Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P ; Sanchez-Jimenez, Rodrigo ; Guerrero-Castillo, Pablo ; Halevi, Gali ; De-Moya, Felix.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:3:s1751157724000695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. On the lack of women researchers in the Middle East and North Africa. (2023). Lariviere, Vincent ; El-Ouahi, Jamal.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04768-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Gender imbalance in doctoral education: an analysis of the Spanish university system (1977–2021). (2023). Sanchez-Jimenez, Rodrigo ; Suarez-Figueroa, Mari Carmen ; Blazquez-Ochando, Manuel ; Barrasa-Rodriguez, Jesus ; Botezan, Iuliana.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04648-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Are female researchers more efficient? An analysis of gender in a Spanish technological university. (2023). Garca-Lvarez, Jose M ; Marti, Luisa ; Puertas, Rosa.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04844-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Research Productivity of Pakistani Female LIS Authors, 1977 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis. (2023). Khan, Muhammad Ajmal ; Mahmood, Khalid ; Adil, Hafiz Muhammad ; Altaf, Asif ; Iqbal, Abid ; Ahmad, Shakil ; Ur, Shafiq ; Siddique, Nadeem.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231207188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons. (2022). Shang, Yuanyuan ; Huang, Ying ; Zhang, Lin ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04209-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Knowledge Production: Analysing Gender- and Country-Dependent Factors in Research Topics through Term Communities. (2022). Bakshi-Hamm, Parminder.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:45-:d:981648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Gender Differences in Collaboration Patterns in Computer Science. (2022). Yamamoto, Josh ; Frachtenberg, Eitan.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:10-:d:757416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Diversity of success: measuring the scholarly performance diversity of tenured professors in the Israeli academia. (2021). Weinberger, Maor ; Zhitomirsky-Geffet, Maayan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03823-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council. (2021). Ruggieri, Roberta ; Pecoraro, Fabrizio ; Luzi, Daniela.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03802-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on Publons. (2021). Sivertsen, Gunnar ; Huang, Ying ; Shang, Yuanyuan ; Zhang, Lin.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:4z6w8_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on Publons. (2021). Shang, Yuanyuan ; Huang, Ying ; Zhang, Lin ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:4z6w8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Women in innovation processes as a solution to climate change: A systematic literature review and an agenda for future research. (2021). Leloarne-Lemaire, Severine ; Razgallah, Meriam ; Bertrand, Gael ; Kallmuenzer, Andreas ; Maalaoui, Adnane.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:164:y:2021:i:c:s004016252031266x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway. (2021). Abramo, Giovanni ; Aksnes, Dag W ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:2:s1751157721000158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. (2021). MADDI, ABDELGHANI ; Gingras, Yves.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:35:y:2021:i:5:p:1381-1404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Gender disparities in the field of economics. (2020). Song, Yinglu ; Yang, Sai ; Liu, Junwan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03627-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups. (2020). Traag, Vincent Antonio ; Squazzoni, Flaminio ; Akbaritabar, Aliakbar ; Caimo, Alberto.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:124:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03555-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. How do public investments in gender equality initiatives and publication patterns interrelate? The case of Germany. (2020). Buhrer, Susanne ; Frietsch, Rainer.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:79:y:2020:i:c:s0149718919304252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. How do public investments in gender equality initiatives and publication patterns interrelate? The case of Germany. (2020). Buhrer, Susanne ; Frietsch, Rainer.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:79:y:2020:i:c:s0149718919302022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Gender diversity in research teams and citation impact in Economics and Management. (2020). MADDI, ABDELGHANI ; Gingras, Yves.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2011.14823.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Gender discrimination in academic careers in Italy. (2019). Pasqua, Silvia ; Filandri, Marianna.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers.
    RePEc:uto:dipeco:201921.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The collaboration behavior of top scientists. (2019). Abramo, Giovanni ; di Costa, Flavia ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:118:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2970-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Gender and Academic Rank in the UK. (2019). SANTOS, Georgina ; van Phu, Stephanie Dang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3171-:d:237538.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. (2018). Mayer, Sabrina J.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2933-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Are scientific memes inherited differently from gendered authorship?. (2018). Fontainha, Elsa ; Araújo, Tanya ; Araujo, Tanya.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2903-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The trench warfare of gender discrimination: evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy. (2018). Meschitti, Viviana ; Marini, Giulio.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2696-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The conundrum of research productivity: a study on sociologists in Italy. (2018). Casnici, Niccolo ; Squazzoni, Flaminio ; Akbaritabar, Aliakbar.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:114:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2606-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification. (2018). Abramo, Giovanni ; di Costa, Flavia ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:114:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2529-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study. (2018). Soto, Patricia ; Lacueva, Graciela ; Bruce, Chrystal D ; Mellis, Birgit ; Wilson, Anne M ; Jayasekare, Rasitha.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0196338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The research activity of the current faculty of the Greek chemical engineering departments: a bibliometric study in national and international context. (2015). Kazakis, Nikolaos A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1523-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The evolution of female authorship in computing research. (2015). Caceres, Paloma ; Cavero, Jose Maria ; Cuesta, Carlos ; Vela, Belen ; Sierra-Alonso, Almudena .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1520-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Forty years of gender disparities in Russian science: a historical bibliometric analysis. (2015). Lariviere, Vincent ; Bouvier, Rebecca L ; Ni, Chaoqun ; Sugimoto, Cassidy R ; Paul-Hus, Adele ; Pislyakov, Vladimir.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1386-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Gender, beauty and support networks in academia: Evidence from a field experiment. (2015). Smyk, Magdalena ; Krawczyk, Michal.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00697.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance. (2014). Cioni, M ; Barabesi, L ; Pisani, C ; Baccini, A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1395-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The sex and ethnicity or national origins of researchers in astronomy and oncology in four countries, 2006–2007 and 2011–2012. (2014). Webber, Richard ; Roe, Philip ; Lewison, Grant.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:100:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1223-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Gender bias and explanation models for the phenomenon of women’s discriminations in research careers. (2013). Kretschmer, Theo.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:97:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1023-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?. (2012). Arensbergen, Pleun ; Besselaar, Peter ; van der Weijden, Inge.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:93:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0712-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Research productivity in education and psychology in the Philippines and comparison with ASEAN countries. (2012). Vinluan, Lorelei R.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:91:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0496-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Life sciences research in Venezuela. (2012). Requena, Jaime ; Vargas, Domingo ; Caputo, Carlo .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:90:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0548-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Female researchers in Russia: have they become more visible?. (2011). Markusova, Valentina ; Lewison, Grant.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:89:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0435-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. National research assessment exercises: a measure of the distortion of performance rankings when labor input is treated as uniform. (2010). Solazzi, Marco ; Abramo, Giovanni ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0164-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity. (2009). Abramo, Giovanni ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea ; Caprasecca, Alessandro .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:81:y:2009:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-008-2131-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 17:09:42 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.