create a website

Contingent valuation of landowner demand for forest amenities: application in Andalusia, Spain. (2022). Oviedo, Jose ; Campos, Pablo ; Caparrs, Alejandro.
In: European Review of Agricultural Economics.
RePEc:oup:erevae:v:49:y:2022:i:3:p:615-643..

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 53

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Land manager preferences for outcome-based payments for environmental services in oak savannahs. (2024). Colombo, Sergio ; Granado-Diaz, Ruben ; Villanueva, Anastasio J.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924000557.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Influence of the Urban Green Spaces of Seville (Spain) on Housing Prices through the Hedonic Assessment Methodology and Geospatial Analysis. (2022). Amaro-Mellado, Jose-Lazaro ; Leiva-Piedra, Jorge Luis ; Ramirez-Juidias, Emilio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16613-:d:1000667.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alberini, A. (1995). Optimal design for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: singlebound, double-bound and bivariate models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28(3): 287–306.

  2. Alberini, A., Longo, A. and Veronesi, M. (2007). Basic statistical models for stated choice studies. In: B. J. Kanninen (ed.), Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 337.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Bastian, C. T., McLeod, D. M., Germino, M. J., Reiners, W. A. and Blasko, B. J. (2002). Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data. Ecological Economics 40: 337–349.

  4. Bishop, R. and Heberlin, T. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agriculture Economics 61(5): 926–930.

  5. BOE. (2011). Real Decreto 1492/2011, de 24 de octubre, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento de valoraciones de la Ley de Suelo. Boletín Oficial del Estado n 270 de 9 de noviembre de 2003. 116626–116651. ISSN: 0212-033X.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Brown, T. C. and Gregory, R. (1999). Why the WTA-WTP disparity matters. Ecological Economics 28: 323–335.

  7. Cameron, T. A. (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15: 355–379.

  8. Cameron, T. A. (1991). Interval estimates for non-market resource values from referendum contingent valuation surveys. Land Economics 67(4): 413–421. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/erae/article/49/3/615/6261046 by White and Case LLP user on November 640 J. L. Oviedo et al.

  9. Cameron, T. A. and Quiggin, J. (1994). Estimation using contingent valuation data from a “dichotomous choice with follow-up questionnaire”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 218–234.

  10. Campos, P., Caparrós, A., Oviedo, J. L., Ovando, P., Álvarez-Farizo, B., Díaz-Balteiro, L., Carranza, J., Beguería, S., Díaz, M., Herruzo, A. C., Martínez-Peña, F., Soliño, M., Álvarez, A., Martínez-Jáuregui, M., Pasalodos-Tato, M., De Frutos, P., Aldea, J., Almazán, E., Concepción, E. D., Mesa, B., Romero, C., Serrano-Notivoli, R., Fernández, C., Torres-Porras, J. and Montero, G. (2019a). Bridging the gap between national and ecosystem accounting application in Andalusian forests, Spain. Ecological Economics 157: 218–236.

  11. Campos, P., Oviedo, J. L., Álvarez, A., Mesa, B. and Caparrós, A. (2019b). Noncommercial intermediate services role in valuing ecosystem services and environmental incomes: application to cork oak farms in Andalusia, Spain. Ecosystem Services 39: 100996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Campos, P., Oviedo, J. L., Alvarez, A., Ovando, P., Mesa, B. and Caparros, A. (2020). Measuring environmental incomes beyond standard national and ecosystem accounting frameworks: testing and comparing the Agroforestry Accounting System in holm oak dehesa case study in Andalusia-Spain. Land Use Policy 99: 104984.

  13. Campos, P., Oviedo, J. L., Caparrós, A., Huntsinger, L. and Coelho, I. (2009). Contingent valuation of private amenities from Oak Woodlands in Spain, Portugal, and California. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62: 240–252.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Caparrós, A., Campos, P. and Montero, G. (2003). An operative framework for total Hicksian income measurement: application to a multiple-use forest. Environmental and Resource Economics 26(2): 173–198.

  15. Caparrós, A., Oviedo, J. L., Álvarez, A. and Campos, P. (2017). Simulated exchange values and ecosystem accounting: theory and application to free-access recreation. Ecological Economics 139: 140–149.

  16. Carson, R. T. and Groves, T. (2007). Incentive and information properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 37: 181–210.

  17. Cooper, J. C. (1993). Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24(1): 25–40.

  18. Díaz, M., Concepción, E., Oviedo, J. L., Caparrós, A., Alvarez-Farizo, B. and Campos, P. (2020). A comprehensive indicator for threatened biodiversity valuation. Ecological Indicators 108: 105696.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Discussion paper 5.1: defining exchange and welfare values, articulating institutional arrangements and establishing the valuation context for ecosystem accounting. https:// seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/discussion_paper_5.1.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/erae/article/49/3/615/6261046 by White and Case LLP user on November Contingent valuation of landowner demand for forest amenities 641 Hein, L., Bagstad, K. J., Obst, C., Edens, B., Schenau, S., Castillo, G., Soulard, F., Brown, C., Driver, A., Bordt, M., Steurer, A., Harris, R. and Caparrós, A. (2020). Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems. Science 367(6477): 514–515.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Gentner, B. J. and Tanaka, J. A. (2002). Classifying federal public land grazing permittees. Journal of Range Management 55: 2–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Hanemann, M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(3): 332–341.

  23. Hanemann, M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? The American Economic Review 81(3). 635–647.

  24. Hanemann, M., Loomis, J. and Kanninen, B. (1991). Statistical efficiency of doublebounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(4): 1255–1263.

  25. Hanley, N. and Czajkowski, M. (2019). The role of stated preference valuation methods in understanding choices and informing policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 13(2): 248–266.

  26. Hausman, J. (2012). Contingent valuation: from dubious to hopeless. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(4): 43–56.

  27. Herriges, J. A. (1999). Measuring goodness of fit for the double-bounded logit model: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1): 231–234.

  28. Horowitz, J. K. and McConnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 426–447.

  29. Huntsinger, L., Johnson, M., Stafford, M. and Fried, J. (2010). Hardwood rangeland landowners in California from 1985 to 2004: production, ecosystem services, and permanence. Rangeland Ecology and Management 63: 324–334.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R., Tourangeau, R. and Vossler, C. A. (2017). Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(2): 319–405.

  31. Kallio, T. (1999). Non-market benefits and forest owners’ total utility in profitability calculations. In: C. S. Roper and A. Park (eds), The Living Forest: Non-market Benefits of Forestry. London, UK: Forestry Commission, 196–202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Kanninen, B. J. (1993). Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Economics 69: 138–146.

  33. Kim, Y., Kling, C. L. and Zhao, J. (2015). Understanding behavioral explanations of the WTP-WTA divergence through a neoclassical lens: implications for environmental policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 7: 169–187.

  34. Martin, W. E. and Jefferies, G. L. (1966). Relating ranch prices and grazing permit values to ranch productivity. Journal of Farm Economics 48: 233–242.

  35. Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Oviedo, J. L., Huntsinger, L. and Campos, P. (2017). The contribution of amenities to landowner income: the case of Spanish and Californian hardwood rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 70(4): 518–528.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Pattanayak, S. K., Murray, B. C. and Abt, R. C. (2002). How joint is joint forest production? An econometric analysis of timber supply conditional on endogenous amenity values. Forest Science 48(3): 479–491.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Pope, C. A. (1985). Agricultural productive and consumptive use components of rural land values in Texas. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(1): 81–86.

  39. Randall, A. and Stoll, J. R. (1980). Consumer’s surplus in commodity space. American Economic Review 71: 449–457.

  40. Raunikar, R. and Buongiorno, J. (2006). Willingness to pay for forest amenities: the case of non-industrial owners in the south central United States. Ecological Economics 56: 132–143.

  41. Remme, R. P., Edens, B., Schröter, M. and Hein, L. (2015). Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 112: 116–128.

  42. Rowe, E. I., Bartlett, E. T. and Swanson, L. E. (2001). Ranching motivations in 2 Colorado counties. Journal of Range Management 54: 314–321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Samuel, J. and Thomas, T. (1999). The valuation of unpriced forest products by private woodland owners in Wales. In: C. S. Roper and A. Park (eds), The Living Forest: Nonmarket Benefits of Forestry. London: Forestry Commission, 203–212.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Scarpa, R., Buongiorno, J., Hseu, J. and Abt, K. L. (2000). Assessing the non-timber value of forests: a revealed-preference, hedonic model. Journal of Forest Economics 6(2): 83–100. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/erae/article/49/3/615/6261046 by White and Case LLP user on November 642 J. L. Oviedo et al.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Torell, L. A., Rimbey, N. R., Ramírez, O. A. and McCollum, D. W. (2005). Income earning potential versus consumptive amenities in determining ranchland values. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30: 537–560.

  46. Train, K. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  47. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: a referencedependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 1039–1061.

  48. United Nations, European Union, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, World Bank. (2014). System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012–central framework. United Nations, New York, 378. https://seea.un.org/sites/ seea.un.org/files/seea_cf_final_en.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. United Nations. (2019). Technical recommendations in support of the system of environmental-economic accounting 2012–experimental ecosystem accounting. https:// seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/technical_recommendations_in_support_of_the_seea _eea_final_white_cover.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. United Nations. (2021). System of Environmental Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting: final draft. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, 362. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/52nd-session/documents/BG-3f-SEEAEA_Final_draft -E.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Vossler, C. A., Doyon, M. and Rondeau, D. (2012). Truth in consequentiality: theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4: 145–171.

  52. Wasson, J. R., McLeod, D. M., Bastian, C. T. and Rashford, B. S. (2013). The effects of environmental amenities on agricultural land values. Land Economics 89: 466–478.

  53. Willig, R. (1976). Consumer’s surplus without apology. American Economic Review 66: 589–597.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Resident Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services in Hillside Forests. (2022). Chen, Wan-Jiun ; Liaw, Shyue-Cherng ; Jan, Jihn-Fa ; Chung, Chih-Hsin.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6193-:d:819469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Information and visual attention in contingent valuation and choice modeling: field and eye-tracking experiments applied to reforestations in Spain. (2015). Oviedo, Jose ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:4:p:185-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Salt or Sludge? Exploring Preferences for Potable Water Sources. (2014). burton, michael ; Gibson, Fiona.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:57:y:2014:i:3:p:453-476.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Ancillary Benefits of GHG Abatement Policies in Developing Countries: A literature Survey. (2014). Shiqiu, Zhang ; Xie, Xuxuan ; Swanson, Timothy ; Quan, Mu ; Ravetti, Chiara.
    In: IHEID Working Papers.
    RePEc:gii:giihei:ciesrp:cies_rp_26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Valuing Morbidity from Wildfire Smoke Exposure: A Comparison of Revealed and Stated Preference Techniques. (2013). Loomis, John ; Champ, Patricia A. ; Richardson, Leslie.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:89:y:2013:i:1:p:76-100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Uncertainty and framing in a valuation task. (2013). Watson, Verity ; Luchini, Stéphane.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:204-214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Estimation efficiency of RP/SP models considering SP design and error structures. (2013). Yamamoto, Toshiyuki ; Sanko, Nobuhiro.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:6:y:2013:i:c:p:60-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Hypothetical Market Familiarity and the Disconnect Between Stated and Observed Values for Green Energy. (2013). Sims, Charles.
    In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eco:journ2:2013-01-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. BID IMPRECISION AS A SOURCE OF HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION ESTIMATION: ANALYSIS OF A SURVEY OF RESPONDENT’S ATTITUDES FOR THE BATTLE OF LEXINGTON STATE HISTORIC SITE (SHS). (2012). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher ; Pattiz, B..
    In: Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies.
    RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:12:y2012:i:2_2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Rural Households’ Demand for Frankincense Forest Conservation in Tigray: A Continent Valuation Analysis. (2012). Vranken, Liesbet ; Mathijs, Erik ; Tilahun, Mesfin ; Gebrehiwot, Kindeya ; Gebregziabher, Kidanemariam ; Deckers, Jozef A. ; Bauer, Hans ; Muys, Bart.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:kucawp:146520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. A Method for Improving Welfare Estimates from Multiple-Referendum Surveys. (2012). Petrolia, Daniel ; Interis, Matthew ; Kim, Gwanseon.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:134287.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions:Progress and Challenges. (2011). Robinson, Lisa ; Hammitt, James ; Cropper, Maureen.
    In: LERNA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ler:wpaper:24547.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. A framework for estimating willingness-to-pay to avoid endogenous environmental risks. (2011). Konishi, Yoshifumi ; Adachi, Kenji .
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:33:y:2011:i:1:p:130-154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Design of experiments for bivariate binary responses modelled by Copula functions. (2011). Duffull, S. B. ; Denman, N. G. ; McGree, J. M. ; Eccleston, J. A..
    In: Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:4:p:1509-1520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Municipal solid waste management, source-separated waste and stakeholder’s attitude: a Contingent Valuation Study. (2010). Banerjee, Sarmila ; Sarkhel, Prasenjit.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:12:y:2010:i:5:p:611-630.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Contingent Valuation: Past, Present and Future. (2010). Mariel, Petr ; Hoyos, David.
    In: Prague Economic Papers.
    RePEc:prg:jnlpep:v:2010:y:2010:i:4:id:380:p:329-343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. —Pricing Digital Content Product Lines: A Model and Application for the National Academies Press. (2009). Jain, Sanjay ; Kannan, P. K. ; Pope, Barbara Kline.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:620-636.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. If you have the flu symptoms, your asymptomatic spouse may better answer the willingness-to-pay question. Evidence from a double-bounded dichotomous choice model with heterogeneous anchoring.. (2009). Luchini, Stephane ; Schwarzinger, Michael ; Carrat, Fabrice.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:inserm-00636179.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. If you have the flu symptoms, your asymptomatic spouse may better answer the willingness-to-pay question: Evidence from a double-bounded dichotomous choice model with heterogeneous anchoring. (2009). Luchini, Stéphane ; Schwarzinger, Michael ; Carrat, Fabrice.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:873-884.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Estimating Local Welfare Generated by a Professional Sports Team: An Application to the Minnesota Vikings under Threat of Relocation. (2008). Fenn, Aju ; Crooker, John.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umn:wpaper:0805.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Are some lives more valuable? An ethical preferences approach. (2008). Martinsson, Peter ; Johansson-Stenman, Olof.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:27:y:2008:i:3:p:739-752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Do emotions matter? Coherent preferences under anchoring and emotional effects. (2008). Araña, Jorge ; Araa, Jorge E. ; Leon, Carmelo J..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:66:y:2008:i:4:p:700-711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why. (2008). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rose, John.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:118543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Designs Efficiency for Non-market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure It, What to Report and Why. (2007). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rose, John.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:07/21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Transportation and land-use preferences and residents’ neighborhood choices: the sufficiency of compact development in the Atlanta region. (2007). Frank, Lawrence ; Levine, Jonathan.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:34:y:2007:i:2:p:255-274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: A comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food. (2007). Roosen, Jutta ; Goldberg, Isabell .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:34:y:2007:i:2:p:123-144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Cost credibility and the stated preference analysis of public goods. (2007). Flores, Nicholas ; Strong, Aaron.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:29:y:2007:i:3:p:195-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The effect of experience and quantity-based pricing on the valuation of a curbside recycling program. (2007). Grijalva, Therese ; Caplan, Arthur ; Bohara, Alok.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:64:y:2007:i:2:p:433-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Green for green: The perceived value of a quantitative change in the urban tree estate of New Zealand. (2007). Vesely, Eva-Terezia.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:63:y:2007:i:2-3:p:605-615.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Can Rural Communities Comply with the New Arsenic Standard for Drinking Water?. (2007). Easter, K. ; Konishi, Yoshifumi ; Cho, Yongsung.
    In: Staff Papers.
    RePEc:ags:umaesp:7353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Is Willingness to Pay for a Public Good Sensitive to the Elicitation Format?. (2006). Bishop, Richard C. ; Champ, Patricia A..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:2:p:162-173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Contingent Valuation. (2006). Carson, Richard T. ; Hanemann, Michael W..
    In: Handbook of Environmental Economics.
    RePEc:eee:envchp:2-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Bid Design and its Influence on the Stated Willingness to Pay in a Contingent Valuation Study. (2006). Calatrava-Requena, Javier ; Carmona-Torres, Carmen.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae06:25367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Bias and Efficiency of Uniform Bid Design in Contingent Valuation. (2006). Kim, Soo-Il .
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Experimental Designs for Environmental Valuation with Choice-Experiments: A Monte-Carlo Investigation. (2005). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Ferrini, Silvia.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:05/08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Robustness of VSL Values from Contingent Valuation Surveys. (2005). Alberini, Anna.
    In: NCEE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:nev:wpaper:wp200501.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation surveys. (2005). Shaw, Daigee ; Chien, Yu-Lan ; Huang, Cliff J..
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:50:y:2005:i:2:p:362-377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Métodos directos e indirectos en la valoración económica de bienes ambientales, aplicación al valor de uso recreativo del Parque Natural de Somiedo.. (2004). DE LA FUENTE, GARCA L. ; VUELTA, COLINA A..
    In: Estudios de Economia Aplicada.
    RePEc:lrk:eeaart:22_3_18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Robustness of VSL Values from Contingent Valuation Surveys. (2004). Alberini, Anna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2004.135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. (2003). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:4:p:281-294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Are Some Lives More Valuable?. (2003). Martinsson, Peter ; Johansson-Stenman, Olof.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Revealed preference valuation compared to contingent valuation: radon‐induced lung cancer prevention. (2002). Kennedy, Christine A..
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:11:y:2002:i:7:p:585-598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Testing Bid Design Effects in Multiple-Bounded, Contingent-Valuation Questions. (2002). Boyle, Kevin ; Welsh, Michael ; Roach, Brian.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:1:p:121-131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Alternative approaches to obtain optimal bid values in contingent valuation studies and to model protest zeros. Estimating the determinants of individuals willingness to pay for home care services in day case surgery. (2001). Eulàlia Dalmau-Matarrodona, .
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:10:y:2001:i:2:p:101-118.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Dichotomous choice contingent valuation probability distributions. (2000). Kerr, Geoffrey N..
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:117836.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. THE VALUE OF ADDITIONAL CENTRAL FLYWAY WETLANDS: THE CASE OF NEBRASKAS RAINWATER BASIN WETLANDS. (1999). Poor, Joan P..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30877.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Évaluation contingente de l’usage récréatif d’une réserve naturelle humide. (1998). Ibaez, Miguel ; Judez, Lucinio ; Urzainqui, Elvira ; Andres, de Rosario ; Hugalde, Carlos Perez .
    In: Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales.
    RePEc:rae:jouces:v:48:y:1998:p:37-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Évaluation contingente de l’usage récréatif d’une réserve naturelle humide. (1998). Hugalde, Carlos Perez ; de Andres, Rosario ; Ibaez, Miguel ; Judez, Lucinio ; Urzainqui, Elvira .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01200908.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries. (1998). Whittington, Dale.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:26:y:1998:i:1:p:21-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Évaluation contingente de l’usage récréatif d’une réserve naturelle humide. (1998). de Andres, Rosario ; Ibaez, Miguel ; Judez, Lucinio ; Urzainqui, Elvira ; Hugalde, Carlos Perez .
    In: Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR).
    RePEc:ags:inrace:206273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 07:50:22 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.