create a website

Environmental and economic effects of sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme in China: A quasi-experiment. (2019). Wu, Xueping ; Guo, Shihong ; Maqbool, Rashid ; Gao, Ming.
In: Energy & Environment.
RePEc:sae:engenv:v:30:y:2019:i:7:p:1255-1274.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 13

Citations received by this document

Cites: 68

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Assessment on the synergistic effect of pollution and carbon reductions in low-carbon city pilot policy: based on effectiveness and efficiency perspectives. (2025). Xie, Qiang ; Zhou, Yunlei ; Fan, Xianxian.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04421-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Property rights governance and urban environmental pollution. (2025). Zhang, Zicheng ; Peng, Jie ; Chen, Shi.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04754-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Effect of Energy Rights Trading Pilot Policies on Urban Carbon Emissions: Empirical Analysis Based on PSM-DID. (2024). Wan, Kai ; Zhang, Baosheng.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8357-:d:1485992.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Is single or synergistic environmental permit trading system more effective? A study based on Chinese industry. (2024). Yu, Yanni ; Zhang, Weijie ; Liu, Qingjun.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:191:y:2024:i:c:s1364032123010316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Biodesulfurization Processes for the Removal of Sulfur from Diesel Oil: A Perspective Report. (2023). Mamuad, Roselle Y ; Sy, Angelo Earvin.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2738-:d:1098072.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Reduce production or increase efficiency? Hazardous air pollutants regulation, energy use, and the synergistic effect on industrial enterprises carbon emission. (2023). Hou, Xiang ; Xu, Jingxuan ; Wang, Jie.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:126:y:2023:i:c:s014098832300525x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Can the Energy-Consumption Permit Trading Scheme Curb SO 2 Emissions? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China. (2022). Liu, Mengyao ; Jiang, Hongli.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16935-:d:1006312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Can Marketization of Environmental Governance Improve Public Health?—Empirical Analysis Based on the Emission Trading System. (2022). Huang, Yongyan ; Li, Shilong.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15518-:d:981311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China. (2022). Dai, Yaxian ; Tong, Lingyun ; Zheng, Haorong ; Gu, Guangtong.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:163:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522000519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Impact of sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme on pollution emissions intensity: A study based on the synthetic control method. (2022). SHEN, Zhiyang ; Zhu, Zunhong ; Huang, Shasha ; Song, Malin ; Chen, Jiandong.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:161:y:2022:i:c:s0301421521005966.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Harnessing relational values for global value chain sustainability: Reframing the roundtable on sustainable palm oils offset mechanism to support smallholders. (2022). Olmsted, Paige ; Jespersen, Kristjan ; Gallemore, Caleb.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:193:y:2022:i:c:s0921800921003621.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Does clean technology weaken the environmental impact on the financial performance? Insight from global oil and gas companies. (2021). Kontesa, Maria ; Brahmana, Rayenda.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:7:p:3411-3423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Carbon Emissions Trading and Sustainable Development in China: Empirical Analysis Based on the Coupling Coordination Degree Model. (2020). Miao, LU ; Huang, Jingru ; Shen, Jie.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:89-:d:467878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J., Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Am J Pol Sci 2015; 59: 495–510.

  2. Alpay E, Kerkvliet J, Buccola S., Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and U.S. food manufacturing. Am J Agric Econ 2002; 84: 887–901.

  3. Ambec S, Lanoie P., Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview executive overview. Acad Manag Perspect 2008; 22: 45–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Barbera A, McConnell V., The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: direct and indirect effects. J Environ Econ Manage 1990; 18: 50–65.

  5. Barro R., Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 1991; 106: 407–443.

  6. Becker R, Henderson V., Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries. J Polit Econ 2000; 108: 379–421.

  7. Bennear L, Olmstead S., The impacts of the “right to know†: information disclosure and the violation of drinking water standards. J Environ Econ Manage 2008; 56: 117–130.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bergh A, Karlsson M., Government size and growth: accounting for economic freedom and globalization. Public Choice 2010; 142: 195–213.

  9. Berman E, Bui L., Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. Rev Econ Stat 2001; 83: 498–510.

  10. Blackman A, Kildegaard A., Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning. Environ Econ Policy Stud 2010; 12: 115–132.

  11. Blackman A., Alternative pollution control policies in developing countries. Discuss Pap 2009; 4: 234–253.

  12. Chan H, Chupp B, Cropper M, , et al, . The impact of trading on the costs and benefits of the Acid Rain Program. J Environ Econ Manage 2018; 88: 180–209.

  13. Chang Y, Wang N., Environmental regulations and emissions trading in China. Energy Policy 2010; 38: 3356–3364.

  14. Cheng B, Dai H, Wang P, , et al, . Impacts of low-carbon power policy on carbon mitigation in Guangdong Province, China. Energy Policy 2016; 88: 515–527.

  15. Chintrakarn P., Environmental regulation and U.S. states’ technical inefficiency. Econ Lett 2008; 100: 363–365.

  16. Cole M, Elliott R, Shimamoto K., Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manage 2005; 50: 121–143.

  17. Dasgupta S, Huq M, Wheeler D, , et al, . Water pollution abatement by Chinese industry: cost estimates and policy implications. Appl Econ 2001; 33: 547–557.

  18. Dominici F, Greenstone M, Sunstein C., Particulate matter matters. Science 2014; 344: 257–259.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Dong Y, Ishikawa M, Liu X, , et al, . The determinants of citizen complaints on environmental pollution: an empirical study from China. J Clean Prod 2011; 19: 1306–1314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Greenstone M., Estimating regulation-induced substitution: the effect of the clean air act on water and ground pollution. Am Econ Rev 2003; 93: 442–448.

  21. Grossman G, Krueger A., Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 1995; 110: 353–377.

  22. Halkos G, Paizanos E., The effect of government expenditure on the environment: an empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 2013; 91: 48–56.

  23. Horbach J., Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources. Res Policy 2008; 37: 163–173.

  24. Huang J., Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and government spending on environmental protection in China—evidence from spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 2018; 175: 431–441.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Jaffe J, Ranson M, Robert N., Stavin Linking tradable permit systems: a key element of emerging international climate policy architecture. Ecol Law Q 2009; 36: 789–808.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Johnstone N, HaÅ¡Ä iÄ I, Popp D., Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ Res Econ 2010; 45: 133–155.

  27. Klaassen G, Nentjes A, Smith M., Testing the theory of emissions trading: experimental evidence on alternative mechanisms for global carbon trading. Ecol Econ 2005; 53: 47–58.

  28. Koehler D, Spengler J., The toxic release inventory: fact or fiction? A case study of the primary aluminum industry. J Environ Manage 2007; 85: 296–307.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Konar S, Cohen M., Information as regulation: the effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. J Environ Econ Manage 1997; 32: 109–124.

  30. Laplante B, Rilstone P., Environmental inspections and emissions of the pulp and paper industry: the case of Quebec. J Environ Econ Manage 1996; 31: 19–36.

  31. Lee J, Veloso F, Hounshell D., Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: evidence from patenting in the U.S. auto industry. Res Policy 2011; 40: 1240–1252.

  32. Li G, He Q, Shao S, , et al, . Environmental non-governmental organizations and urban environmental governance: evidence from China. J Environ Manage 2018; 206: 1296–1307.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Liu X, Lin B, Zhang Y., Sulfur dioxide emission reduction of power plants in China: current policies and implications. J Clean Prod 2016; 113: 133–143.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Liu Y, Hao Y, Gao Y., The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: evidence from China. Energy Policy 2017; 108: 271–280.

  35. Malik A., Further results on permit markets with market power and cheating. J Environ Econ Manage 2002; 44: 371–390.

  36. Manello A., Productivity growth, environmental regulation and win–win opportunities: the case of chemical industry in Italy and Germany. Eur J Oper Res 2017; 262: 733–743.

  37. Marconi D., Environmental regulation and revealed comparative advantages in Europe: is China a pollution haven? Rev Int Econ 2012; 20: 616–635.

  38. Miao Z, Geng Y, Sheng J., Efficient allocation of CO2 emissions in China: a zero sum gains data envelopment model. J Clean Prod 2016; 112: 4144–4150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Milliman S, Prince R., Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: reply. J Environ Econ Manage 1992; 22: 292–296.

  40. Montgomery W., Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J Econ Theory 1972; 5: 395–418.

  41. Murphy J, Stranlund J., Direct and market effects of enforcing emissions trading programs: an experimental analysis. J Econ Behav Organ 2006; 61: 217–233.

  42. Nasreen S, Anwar S, Ozturk I., Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017; 67: 1105–1122.

  43. Nurudeen A, Usman A., Government expenditure and economic growth in Nigeria, 1970–2008 : a disaggregated analysis. Bus Econ J 2010; 2010: 1–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Philibert C., How could emissions trading benefit developing countries. Energy Policy 2000; 28: 947–956.

  45. Ramanathan R, He Q, Black A, , et al, . Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: a revisit of the Porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 2017; 155: 79–92.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Rochlitz M, Kulpina V, Remington T, , et al, . Performance incentives and economic growth: regional officials in Russia and China. Eurasian Geogr Econ 2015; 56: 421–445.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Sengupta A., Environmental regulation and industry dynamics. Anal Policy Top 2008; 10: 1–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Shadbegian R, Gray W., What determines environmental performance at paper mills? The roles of abatement spending, regulation, and efficiency. Top Econ Anal Policy 2003; 3: 1–18.

  49. Shin S., China’s failure of policy innovation: the case of sulphur dioxide emissions trading. Env Polit 2013; 22: 918–934.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Slaughter M., Trade liberalization and per capita income convergence: a difference-in-differences analysis. J Int Econ 2001; 55: 203–228.

  51. Soukopová J, Struk M., Methodology for the efficiency evaluation of the municipal environmental protection expenditure. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol 2011; 359: 327–340.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Stavins R, Whitehead B., Pollution charges for environmenal protection: a policy link between energy and environment. Annu Rev Energy Environ 1992; 17: 187–210.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Stranlund J, Murphy J, Spraggon J., Price controls and banking in emissions trading: an experimental evaluation. J Environ Econ Manage 2014; 68: 71–86.

  54. Teeter P, Sandberg J., Constraining or enabling green capability development? How policy uncertainty affects organizational responses to flexible environmental regulations. Br J Manage 2017; 28: 649–665.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Tian X, Guo Q, Han C, , et al, . Different extent of environmental information disclosure across Chinese cities: contributing factors and correlation with local pollution. Glob Environ Chang 2016; 39: 244–257.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Tietenberg T., The tradable-permits approach to protecting the commons: lessons for climate change. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 2003; 19: 400–419.

  57. Tu Z, Shen R., Can China’s industrial SO2 emissions trading pilot scheme reduce pollution abatement costs? Sustainability 2014; 6: 7621–7645.

  58. Wang H, Wheeler D., Financial incentives and endogenous enforcement in China’s pollution levy system. J Environ Econ Manage 2005; 49: 174–196.

  59. Wang J, Yang J, Ge C, , et al, . Controlling sulfur dioxide in China: will emissions trading work? Environment 2004; 46: 28–39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Xie R, Yuan Y, Huang J., Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “Green†productivity: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 2017; 132: 104–112.

  61. Yin K, Wang R, An Q, , et al, . Using eco-efficiency as an indicator for sustainable urban development: a case study of Chinese provincial capital cities. Ecol Indic 2014; 36: 665–671.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Zhang B, Zhang H, Liu B, , et al, . Policy interactions and underperforming emissions trading markets in China. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 7077–7084.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Zhang H, Wang S, Hao J, , et al, . Air pollution and control action in Beijing. J Clean Prod 2016; 112: 1519–1527.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Zhang Q, He K, Huo H., Cleaning China’s air. Nature 2012; 484: 161–162.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Zhang Y, Peng Y, Ma C, , et al, . Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 2017; 100: 18–28.

  66. Zhang Y, Wei Y., An overview of current research on EU ETS: evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Appl Energy 2010; 87: 1804–1814.

  67. Zheng S, Kahn M, Sun W, , et al, . Incentives for China’s urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: the role of the central government and public environmentalism. Reg Sci Urban Econ 2014; 47: 61–71.

  68. Zhou J, Mao X, Hu T, , et al, . Implications of the 11th and 12th Five-Year Plans for energy conservation and CO2 and air pollutants reduction: a case study from the city of Urumqi, China. J Clean Prod 2016; 112: 1767–1777.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Assessing the Heterogeneous Impact of Economy-Wide Shocks: A Machine Learning Approach Applied to Colombian Firms. (2024). Serti, Francesco ; Ortiz Gimenez, Victor ; Duenas, Marco ; Riccaboni, Massimo.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2104.04570.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Optimal Experimental Design for Staggered Rollouts. (2023). Imbens, Guido ; Athey, Susan ; Xiong, Ruoxuan ; Bayati, Mohsen.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1911.03764.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The benefits of US statehood: an analysis of the growth effects of joining the USA. (2023). Spruk, Rok ; Maseland, Robbert.
    In: Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History.
    RePEc:afc:cliome:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:49-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Large Dimensional Latent Factor Modeling with Missing Observations and Applications to Causal Inference. (2022). Pelger, Markus ; Xiong, Ruoxuan.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1910.08273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time. (2022). Bradic, Jelena ; Viviano, Davide.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1904.01490.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Containing costs in the Italian local healthcare market. (2021). Riganti, Andrea.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:30:y:2021:i:5:p:1001-1014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Disastrous Discretion: Ambiguous Decision Situations Foster Political Favoritism. (2021). Schneider, Stephan ; Kunze, Sven.
    In: KOF Working papers.
    RePEc:kof:wpskof:21-491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on employment: A synthetic control analysis. (2021). Marinello, Samantha ; Pugach, Oksana ; Powell, Lisa M ; Leider, Julien.
    In: Economics & Human Biology.
    RePEc:eee:ehbiol:v:40:y:2021:i:c:s1570677x20302094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Synthetic Controls with Staggered Adoption. (2021). Rothstein, Jesse ; Ben-Michael, Eli ; Feller, Avi.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1912.03290.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Climate policy, stranded assets, and investors’ expectations. (2020). von Schickfus, Marie-Theres ; Sen, Suphi.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:100:y:2020:i:c:s0095069618307083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. On the Properties of the Synthetic Control Estimator with Many Periods and Many Controls. (2020). Ferman, Bruno.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1906.06665.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Dosis facit effectum: Why the scope of the carbon tax matters - Evidence from the Swedish residential sector. (2019). Runst, Petrik ; Thonipara, Anita.
    In: ifh Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifhwps:192019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Using the Synthetic Control Method to Determine the Effect of Ultrasound Laws on State-Level Abortion Rates. (2019). Gius, Mark.
    In: Atlantic Economic Journal.
    RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:47:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11293-019-09619-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Paid Family Leave and Breastfeeding: Evidence from California. (2019). Ruhm, Christopher ; Pac, Jessica ; Waldfogel, Jane ; Bartel, Ann P.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hka:wpaper:2019-031.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Does the Low-Carbon Pilot Initiative Reduce Carbon Emissions? Evidence from the Application of the Synthetic Control Method in Guangdong Province. (2019). Yu, Xuan ; Shen, Manhong ; Wang, DI ; Imwa, Bernadette Tadala.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3979-:d:250697.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Carbon Pricing and Power Sector Decarbonisation: Evidence from the UK. (2019). Leroutier, Marion.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fae:wpaper:2019.12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Carbon Pricing and Power Sector Decarbonisation: Evidence from the UK. (2019). Leroutier, Marion.
    In: Policy Papers.
    RePEc:fae:ppaper:2019.03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe. (2019). Moretti, Luigi ; coricelli, fabrizio ; Campos, Nauro.
    In: Journal of Monetary Economics.
    RePEc:eee:moneco:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:88-104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Antiquities Act, national monuments, and the regional economy. (2019). Jakus, Paul ; Akhundjanov, Sherzod.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:95:y:2019:i:c:p:102-117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The quality-access tradeoff in decentralizing public services: Evidence from education in the OECD and Spain. (2019). Guerra, Susana Cordeiro ; Lastra-Anadon, Carlos Xabel.
    In: Journal of Comparative Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jcecon:v:47:y:2019:i:2:p:295-316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Using the synthetic control method to determine the effects of concealed carry laws on state-level murder rates. (2019). Gius, Mark.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:57:y:2019:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Do Direct Elections Matter? Quasi-experimental Evidence from Germany. (2019). Roesel, Felix ; Gäbler, Stefanie ; Gabler, Stefanie ; Rosel, Felix.
    In: ifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ifowps:_298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Effects of International Sanctions on Military Spending of Iran: A Synthetic Control Analysis. (2019). Farzanegan, Mohammad Reza.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7937.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme. (2019). Nathan, Max.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. How well can we learn large factor models without assuming strong factors?. (2019). Zhu, Yinchu.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1910.10382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know About. (2019). Imbens, Guido ; Athey, Susan.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1903.10075.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Rethinking Policy Evaluation – Do Simple Neural Nets Bear Comparison with Synthetic Control Method?. (2018). Steinkraus, Arne.
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:177390.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Causal effects of PetroCaribe on sustainable development: a synthetic control analysis. (2018). Tol, Richard ; Kuik, Onno ; Jardon, Acel.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sus:susewp:0918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Does When You Die Depend on Where You Live? Evidence from Hurricane Katrina. (2018). Molitor, David ; Deryugina, Tatyana.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24822.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Méthodologie de l’évaluation d’impact de l’expérimentation Parcours santé des aînés (Paerpa). (2018). Or, Zeynep ; Bricard, Damien ; Penneau, Anne.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:irh:wpaper:dt74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. “Do government formation deadlocks damage economic growth? Evidence from history’s longest period of political deadlock”. (2018). Albalate, Daniel ; Bel, Germa.
    In: IREA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ira:wpaper:201817.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Compulsory voting, habit formation, and political participation. (2018). Bechtel, Michael M ; Schmid, Lukas ; Hangartner, Dominik.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:89714.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The effect of sugar and processed food imports on the prevalence of overweight and obesity in 172 countries. (2018). Teymourian, Yasmin ; Lin, Tracy Kuo ; Tursini, Maitri Shila.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:101053.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Two tales of two U.S. states: Regional fiscal austerity and economic performance. (2018). WANG, HONGBO ; Rickman, Dan.
    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regeco:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:46-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Comparing the Effects of Current Pay and Defined Benefit Pensions on Employee Retention: Working Paper 2018-06. (2018). Karamcheva, Nadia ; Falk, Justin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cbo:wpaper:54056.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Synthetic Control Methods and Big Data. (2018). Kinn, Daniel.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1803.00096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Does California’s LCFS Reduce CO2 Emissions?. (2018). Palma, Marco ; Huseynov, Samir.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:274200.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The fiscal impact of natural disasters. (2017). Koetsier, I.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:use:tkiwps:1717.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. State Medicaid Expansions and Mortality, Revisited: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. (2017). Sommers, Benjamin D.
    In: American Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:tpr:amjhec:v:3:y:2017:i:3:p:392-421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Labor Market Effects of a Refugee Wave: Synthetic Control Method Meets the Mariel Boatlift. (2017). Peri, Giovanni ; Yasenov, Vasil.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The local effects of an innovation: Evidence from the French fish market. (2017). Wolff, François-Charles ; Gobillon, Laurent.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-01431160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The aftermath of 2008 turmoil on Brazilian economy: Tsunami or “Marolinha”?. (2017). Merlin, Giovanni ; Marçal, Emerson ; Cunha, Ronan ; Simes, Oscar Rodrigues ; Maral, Emerson Fernandes.
    In: Textos para discussão.
    RePEc:fgv:eesptd:459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. The effects of minimum wages on firm-financed apprenticeship training. (2017). Schumann, Mathias.
    In: Labour Economics.
    RePEc:eee:labeco:v:47:y:2017:i:c:p:163-181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. The local effects of an innovation: Evidence from the French fish market. (2017). Wolff, François-Charles ; Gobillon, Laurent.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11757.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Volatile Top Income Shares in Switzerland? Reassessing the Evolution Between 1981 and 2010. (2016). Martínez, Isabel ; Foellmi, Reto.
    In: Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:usg:econwp:2016:12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Universities as engines for regional growth? Using the synthetic control method to analyze the effects of research universities. (2016). Jakobsson, Niklas ; Svenson, Mikael ; Podesta, Federico ; Bonander, Carl.
    In: FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers.
    RePEc:fbk:wpaper:2016-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Examination of the synthetic control method for evaluating health policies with multiple treated units. (2016). Kreif, Noemi ; Nikolova, Silviya ; Grieve, Richard ; Sutton, Matt ; Hangartner, Dominik ; Turner, Alex James.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:65074.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Universities as engines for regional growth? Using the synthetic control method to analyze the effects of research universities. (2016). Svensson, Mikael ; Jakobsson, Niklas ; Podesta, Federico ; Bonander, Carl.
    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regeco:v:60:y:2016:i:c:p:198-207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Unintended effects of the Alabama HB 56 immigration law on crime: A preliminary analysis. (2016). Zhang, Yinjunjie (Jacquelyn ; Xu, Zhicheng ; Palma, Marco.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:147:y:2016:i:c:p:68-71.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. When Does Introducing a Value-Added Tax Increase Economic Efficiency? Evidence from the Synthetic Control Method. (2015). Adhikari, Bibek.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tul:wpaper:1524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 06:57:50 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.