create a website

Does Social Welfare Programmes Influence Households Trust in Local Administration and Their Political Participation? Evidence from the MGNREG Scheme in India. (2022). Kumar, Rajender ; Goyal, Ankush.
In: Indian Journal of Human Development.
RePEc:sae:inddev:v:16:y:2022:i:3:p:602-617.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 64

References cited by this document

Cocites: 49

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adato M., (2000). The impact of PROGRESA on community social relationships. International Food Policy Research Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Afridi F., , Iversen V., , & Sharan M. R., (2017). Women political leaders, corruption, and learning: Evidence from a large public program in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 66(1), 1–30.

  3. Araújo V., (2021). Do anti-poverty policies sway voters? Evidence from a meta-analysis of conditional cash transfers. Research & Politics, 8(1), 2053168021991715.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Banerjee A., , Duflo E., , Imbert C., , Mathew S., , & Pande R., (2020). E-governance, accountability, and leakage in public programs: Experimental evidence from a financial management reform in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(4), 39–72.

  5. Bardhan P. K., , Mitra S., , Mookherjee D., , & Nath A., (2018). Resource transfers to local governments: Political manipulation and household responses in West Bengal [Working Papers Series dp-319]. The Institute of Economic Development, Boston University.

  6. Berg E., , Bhattacharyya S., , Rajasekhar D., , & Manjula R., (2018). Can public works increase equilibrium wages? Evidence from India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee. World Development, 103, 239–254. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.027.

  7. Beshi T. D., , & Kaur R., (2020). Public trust in local government: Explaining the role of good governance practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337–350.

  8. Bose N., , & Das S., (2018). Political reservation for women and delivery of public works program. Review of Development Economics, 22(1), 203–219.

  9. Bruch S. K., , Ferree M. M., , & Soss J., (2010). From policy to polity: Democracy, paternalism, and the incorporation of disadvantaged citizens. American Sociological Review, 75(2), 205–226.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Camacho L. A., (2014). The effects of conditional cash transfers on social engagement and trust in institutions: Evidence from Peru’s Juntos programme [Discussion paper 24], German Development Institute.

  11. Chau N. H., , Liu Y., , & Soundararajan V., (2021). Political activism as a determinant of strategic transfers: Evidence from an Indian public works program. European Economic Review, 132, 103631. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103631.

  12. Chen X., , & Shi T., (2001). Media effects on political confidence and trust in the People’s Republic of China in the post-Tiananmen period. East Asia, 19(3), 84–118.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Clark J. R., , & Lee D. R., (2001). The optimal trust in government. Eastern Economic Journal, 27(1), 19–34.

  14. Conover E., , Zárate R. A., , Camacho A., , & Baez J. E., (2020). Cash and ballots: Conditional transfers, political participation, and voting behavior. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 68(2), 541–566.

  15. Cooper C. A., , Knotts H. G., , & Brennan K. M., (2008). The importance of trust in government for public administration: The case of zoning. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 459–468.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Curini L., , Jou W., , & Memoli V., (2012). Satisfaction with democracy and the winner/loser debate: The role of policy preferences and past experience. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 241–261.

  17. Das U., (2015). Can the rural employment guarantee scheme reduce rural out-migration: Evidence from West Bengal, India. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(6), 621–641.

  18. Dasgupta A., , Gawande K., , & Kapur D., (2017). (When) do antipoverty programs reduce violence? India’s rural employment guarantee and Maoist conflict. International Organization, 71(3), 605–632.

  19. De La O A. L., (2013). Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 1–14.

  20. de Milliano M., , Barrington C., , Angeles G., , & Gbedemah C., (2021). Crowding-out or crowding-in? Effects of LEAP 1000 unconditional cash transfer program on household and community support among women in rural Ghana. World Development, 143, 105466.

  21. Deininger K., , & Liu Y., (2019). Heterogeneous welfare impacts of national rural employment guarantee scheme: Evidence from Andhra Pradesh, India. World Development, 117, 98–111. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105466.

  22. Desai R. M., , & Joshi S., (2014). Collective action and community development: Evidence from self-help groups in rural India. The World Bank Economic Review, 28(3), 492–524.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Deshpande R., , Tillin L., , & Kailash K. K., (2019). The BJP’s welfare schemes: Did they make a difference in the 2019 elections?. Studies in Indian Politics, 7(2), 219–233.

  24. Downe J., , Cowell R., , Chen A., , & Morgan K., (2013). The determinants of public trust in English local government: How important is the ethical behaviour of elected councillors?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 597–617.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Dunn C., (2017). The participating poor: The effect of conditional cash transfers on beneficiary political participation [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Esteves T., , Rao K. V., , Sinha B., , Roy S. S., , Rao B., , Jha S. K., , Singh A. B., , Patil V., , Sharma N., , Rao S. A., , Murthy I. K., , Sharma R., , Porsche I., , Basu K., , & Ravindranath N. H., (2013). Agricultural and livelihood vulnerability reduction through the MGNREGA. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(52), 94–103.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Evans D. K., , Holtemeyer B., , & Kosec K., (2019). Cash transfers increase trust in local government. World Development, 114, 138–155. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.020.

  28. Galiani S., , Hajj N., , McEwan P. J., , Ibarrarán P., , & Krishnaswamy N., (2019). Voter response to peak and end transfers: Evidence from a conditional cash transfer experiment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(3), 232–260.

  29. Ghorpade Y., , & Justino P., (2019). Winning or buying hearts and minds? Cash transfers and political attitudes in Pakistan [WIDER working paper 91]. United Nations University.

  30. Gupta B., , & Mukhopadhyay A., (2016). Local funds and political competition: Evidence from the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in India. European Journal of Political Economy, 41, 14–30. 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.10.009.

  31. Han Z., , Lin K., , & Tao P., (2019). Perceived quality of governance and trust in government in rural China: A comparison between villagers and officials. Social Science Quarterly, 100(5), 1726–1743.

  32. Hetherington M. J., (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808.

  33. Imbert C., & Papp J., (2011). Estimating leakages in India’s employment guarantee. In Khera R., (Ed.), The battle for employment guarantee (pp. 269–278). Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Jha R., , Gaiha R., , & Pandey M. K., (2013). Body mass index, participation, duration of work and earnings under the national rural employment guarantee scheme: Evidence from Rajasthan. Journal of Asian Economics, 26, 14–30. 10.1016/j.asieco.2013.03.001.

  35. Julia T., , Sumarto S., , & Moody H., (2014). Assessing the political impacts of a conditional cash transfer: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in Indonesia. The SMERU Research Institute.

  36. Klonner S., , & Oldiges C., (2019). The welfare effects of India’s rural employment guarantee [Working paper 129]. Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Kogan V., (2021). Do welfare benefits pay electoral dividends? Evidence from the national food stamp program rollout. The Journal of Politics, 83(1), 58–70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Kumar D., , Pratap B., , & Aggarwal A., (2021). Public trust in state governments in India: Who are more confident and what makes them confident about the government. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 6(2), 154–174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Kumar N., , Raghunathan K., , Arrieta A., , Jilani A., , Chakrabarti S., , Menon P., , & Quisumbing A. R., (2019). Social networks, mobility, and political participation: The potential for women’s self-help groups to improve access and use of public entitlement schemes in India. World Development, 114, 28–41. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Li Z., , & Wu X., (2018). Social policy and political trust: Evidence from the new rural pension scheme in China. The China Quarterly, 235, 644–668. 10.1017/S0305741018000942.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Manacorda M., , Miguel E., , & Vigorito A., (2011). Government transfers and political support. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 1–28.

  42. Mathur N., (2017). Eating Money: Corruption and its categorical ‘Other’ in the leaky Indian state. Modern Asian Studies, 51(6), 1796–1817.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Mettler S., , & Stonecash J. M., (2008). Government program usage and political voice. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), 273–293.

  44. Miller A. H., , & Listhaug O., (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 357–386.

  45. Mishra J., , & Attri V., (2020). Governance, public service delivery and trust in government. Studies in Indian Politics, 8(2), 186–202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Mukherjee A. K., (2017). Safety net programs in West Bengal: How much effective?. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(12), 2019–2032.

  47. Muralidharan K., , Niehaus P., , & Sukhtankar S., (2017). General equilibrium effects of (improving) public employment programs: Experimental evidence from India [Working paper 23838]. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  48. Niehaus P., , & Sukhtankar S., (2013a). Corruption dynamics: The golden goose effect. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 230–269.

  49. Niehaus P., , & Sukhtankar S., (2013b). The marginal rate of corruption in public programs: Evidence from India. Journal of Public Economics, 104, 52–64. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.05.001.

  50. Nupia O., (2018). The allocation of conditional cash transfer programs: Political motives and voting effects. Journal of Development Perspectives, 2(1–2), 29–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. OECD (2017). Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. OECD Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Pankaj A., , & Tankha R., (2010). Empowerment effects of the NREGS on women workers: A study in four states. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(30), 45–55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Ravi S., , & Engler M., (2015). Workfare as an effective way to fight poverty: The case of India’s NREGS. World Development, 67, 57–71. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.029.

  54. Rios V., , Ivaschenko O., , & Doyle J., (2020). Cash transfers’ effect on government support: The case of Fiji. Disasters, 44(1), 152–178.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Saibal G., (2017). Did MGNREGS improve financial inclusion?. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(12), 106–114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Schober G. S., (2019). Conditional cash transfers, resources, and political participation in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 54(3), 591–607.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Shankar S., , Gaiha R., , & Jha R., (2011). Information, access and targeting: The national rural employment guarantee scheme in India. Oxford Development Studies, 39(01), 69–95.

  58. Singh K., (2020). The extent of financial inclusion through MGNREGS: A district level analysis in West Bengal, India. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(1), 121–139.

  59. Spiteri J., , & Briguglio M., (2018). Does good governance foster trust in government? An empirical analysis. In Grima S., & Marano P., (Eds.), Governance and regulations’ contemporary issues (pp. 121–137). Emerald Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Swartz T. T., , Blackstone A., , Uggen C., , & McLaughlin H., (2009). Welfare and citizenship: The effects of government assistance on young adults’ civic participation. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(4), 633–665.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Varvarigos D., , & Xin G., (2015). Social interactions, the evolution of trust, and economic growth [Working paper 15/05]. Department of Economics, University of Leicester.

  62. Yousaf M., , Ihsan F., , & Ellahi A., (2016). Exploring the impact of good governance on citizens’ trust in Pakistan. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 200–209.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Zimmermann L., (2015). May there be victory: Government election performance and the world’s largest public-works program [Discussion paper 9161]. IZA Institute of Labour Economics.

  64. Zucco Jr C., (2013). When payouts pay off: Conditional cash transfers and voting behavior in Brazil 2002–10. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 810–822.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Foreign Aid and Corruption: Do Women Make the Difference?. (2025). Carillo, Maria Rosaria ; Pennacchio, Luca ; de Siano, Rita ; Chiariello, Valentina.
    In: Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti.
    RePEc:spr:italej:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40797-023-00260-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Women legislators and economic performance. (2024). Baskaran, Thushyanthan ; Uppal, Yogesh ; Bhalotra, Sonia ; Min, Brian.
    In: Journal of Economic Growth.
    RePEc:kap:jecgro:v:29:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10887-023-09236-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Corruption in Bank Lending: The Role of Culturally Endorsed Leadership Prototypes. (2024). Gaganis, Chrysovalantis ; Tasiou, Menelaos ; Pasiouras, Fotios.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:193:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05546-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Importance of Being Local? Administrative Decentralization and Human Development. (2024). Iyer, Lakshmi ; Chaudhary, Latika.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17053.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Electoral competition, electoral uncertainty and corruption: Theory and evidence from India. (2024). Afridi, Farzana ; Solan, Eilon ; Dhillon, Amrita ; Bhattacharya, Sourav.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:227:y:2024:i:c:s0167268124002385.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Female representation in school management and school quality. (2024). Jain, Chandan ; Nandwani, Bharti.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:222:y:2024:i:c:p:84-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Governance response during COVID‐19 and political affirmative action: Evidence from local governments in India. (2023). PANDEY, VIVEK ; Kumar, Deepak ; Rathi, Ankita.
    In: Public Administration & Development.
    RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:43:y:2023:i:2:p:185-195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity, or just tax the rich? Development, efficiency, and the pursuit of equity. (2023). Ghosh, Arghya ; Bose, Gautam.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:swe:wpaper:2023-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Are majority-female-owned firms more susceptible to bribery solicitations?. (2023). Oyekola, Olayinka ; Ogunmokun, Olapeju C ; Omolo, Martha A.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:exe:wpaper:2311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Contemporaneous and lasting effects of electoral gender quotas. (2023). Motghare, Swapnil.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:170:y:2023:i:c:s0305750x23001109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. De Jure versus De Facto transparency: Corruption in local public office in India. (2023). Shenoy, Ajay ; Zimmermann, Laura V ; Jeong, Dahyeon.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:221:y:2023:i:c:s0047272723000373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Fighting violence against women: The role of female political representation. (2023). Galletta, Sergio ; Buonanno, Paolo ; Bochenkova, Alena.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:164:y:2023:i:c:s0304387823000950.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The effect of female representation on political budget cycle and public expenditure: Evidence from Italian municipalities. (2023). Rose, Giuseppe ; Ordine, Patrizia ; Giacobbe, Pasquale.
    In: Economics and Politics.
    RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:97-145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The importance of political selection for bureaucratic effectiveness. (2023). Scot, Thiago ; Khemani, Stuti ; Habyarimana, James.
    In: Economica.
    RePEc:bla:econom:v:90:y:2023:i:359:p:746-779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. What do (future) civil servants think of bribery and corruption? Evidence from India. (2023). Gupta, Saurabh ; Birner, Regina ; Verma, Rajiv.
    In: Development Policy Review.
    RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:3:n:e12673.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity, or just tax the rich? Development, efficiency, and the pursuit of equity. (2022). Ghosh, Arghya ; Bose, Gautam.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:swe:wpaper:2022-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Does Social Welfare Programmes Influence Households Trust in Local Administration and Their Political Participation? Evidence from the MGNREG Scheme in India. (2022). Kumar, Rajender ; Goyal, Ankush.
    In: Indian Journal of Human Development.
    RePEc:sae:inddev:v:16:y:2022:i:3:p:602-617.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The power of employment: Effects of India’s employment guarantee on women empowerment. (2022). Rodriguez, Zachary.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:152:y:2022:i:c:s0305750x21004186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Under pressure: Women’s leadership during the COVID-19 crisis. (2022). Bruce, Raphael ; Remigio, Mario ; Meloni, Luis ; Cavgias, Alexsandros.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:154:y:2022:i:c:s0304387821001243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Women Legislators and Economic Performance. (2021). Bhalotra, Sonia ; Baskaran, Thushyanthan ; Uppal, Yogesh ; Min, Brian.
    In: QAPEC Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:wrk:wqapec:03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Women Legislators and Economic Performance. (2021). Bhalotra, Sonia ; Baskaran, Thushyanthan ; Uppal, Yogesh ; Min, Brian.
    In: The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS).
    RePEc:wrk:warwec:1354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Can information campaigns reduce last mile payment delays in public works programme?: Evidence from a field experiment in India. (2021). Paul, Amartya ; Das, Upasak ; Sharma, Mohit.
    In: WIDER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2021-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Under Pressure: Womens Leadership During the COVID-19 Crisis. (2021). Bruce, Raphael ; Alexsandros, Luis Meloni.
    In: Working Papers, Department of Economics.
    RePEc:spa:wpaper:2021wpecon19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Gender inequality and caste: Field experimental evidence from India. (2021). Zenou, Yves ; Wang, Liang ; Sahoo, Soubhagya ; Pakrashi, Debayan ; Islam, Asad.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2021-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Female policymakers and educational expenditures: cross-country evidence. (2021). Chen, Li-Ju.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:51:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-020-09673-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Gender Inequality and Caste: Field Experimental Evidence from India. (2021). Zenou, Yves ; Wang, Liang ; Sahoo, Soubhagya ; Pakrashi, Debayan ; Islam, Asad.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Modeling Political Corruption in Spain. (2021). Merello, Paloma ; Jodar, Lucas ; de la Poza, Elena.
    In: Mathematics.
    RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:9:p:952-:d:542537.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Across the stolen Ponds: The political geography of social welfare in rural eastern India. (2021). Dey, Subhasish ; Das, Ritanjan ; Neogi, Ranjita.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:146:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x21001595.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Gender inequality and caste: Field experimental evidence from India. (2021). Zenou, Yves ; Wang, Liang ; Sahoo, Soubhagya ; Pakrashi, Debayan ; Islam, Asad.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:190:y:2021:i:c:p:111-124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Gender heterogeneity of bureaucrats in attitude to corruption: Evidence from list experiment. (2021). Tkachenko, Andrey ; Detkova, Polina ; Yakovlev, Andrei.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:189:y:2021:i:c:p:217-233.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Political activism as a determinant of strategic transfers: Evidence from an indian public works program. (2021). Chau, Nancy ; Liu, Yanyan ; Soundararajan, Vidhya.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:132:y:2021:i:c:s0014292120302610.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Electoral Competition, Accountability and Corruption:Theory and Evidence from India. (2021). Bhattacharya, Sourav ; Afridi, Farzana ; Solan, Eilon ; Dhillon, Amrita.
    In: CAGE Online Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cge:wacage:569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Importance of being Earnest: What Explains the Gender Quota Effect in Politics?. (2021). Mahajan, Kanika ; Das, Sabyasachi ; Chaturvedi, Sugat.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ash:wpaper:52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The importance of being earnest: What explains the gender quota effect in politics?. (2021). Mahajan, Kanika ; Das, Sabyasachi ; Chaturvedi, Sugat.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:alo:isipdp:21-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Political Reservation and Female Labor Force Participation in Rural India. (2020). Jin, Songqing ; Deininger, Klaus ; Singh, Sudhir K ; Nagarajan, Hari Krishnan.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:9350.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Women€™s Political Representation and Educational Attainments: A District-level Analysis in India. (2020). singh, karan ; Burchi, Francesco.
    In: Journal of South Asian Development.
    RePEc:sae:soudev:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:7-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Womens political leadership and economic empowerment: Evidence from public works in India. (2020). Singh, Sudhir ; Deininger, Klaus ; Nagarajan, Hari K.
    In: Journal of Comparative Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jcecon:v:48:y:2020:i:2:p:277-291.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Time in Office and the Changing Gender Gap in Dishonesty: Evidence from Local Politics in India. (2020). Maitra, Pushkar ; Chaudhuri, Ananish ; Iversen, Vegard ; Jensenius, Francesca R.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Income Guarantees and Borrowing in Risky Environments: Evidence from Indias Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. (2020). Mukhopadhyay, Abhiroop ; bell, clive.
    In: Economica.
    RePEc:bla:econom:v:87:y:2020:i:347:p:763-812.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Post-clientelistic initiatives in a patronage democracy: The distributive politics of India’s MGNREGA. (2019). Das, Upasak ; Maiorano, Diego.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:117:y:2019:i:c:p:239-252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Female leaders and their response to the social environment. (2019). Maitra, Pushkar ; Jain, Tarun ; Gangadharan, Lata ; Vecci, Joseph.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:164:y:2019:i:c:p:256-272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Electoral Competition and Corruption: Theory and Evidence from India. (2019). Dhillon, Amrita ; Afridi, Farzana ; Solan, Eilon.
    In: CAGE Online Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cge:wacage:423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Presence into Participation and Representation. (2018). .
    In: Journal of South Asian Development.
    RePEc:sae:soudev:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:1-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Political Activism as a Determinant of Clientelistic Transfers: Evidence from an Indian Public Works Program. (2018). Liu, Yanyan ; Chau, Nancy ; Soundararajan, Vidhya.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Women and corruption: What positions must they hold to make a difference?. (2018). Sarangi, Sudipta ; Jha, Chandan.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:151:y:2018:i:c:p:219-233.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Do welfare programs work in weak states? Why? Evidence from a maternity support program in India. (2018). Ghosh, Prabhat ; Kochar, Anjini.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:134:y:2018:i:c:p:191-208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Does Affirmative Action in Politics Hinder Performance? Evidence from India. (2018). Mukhopadhyay, Abhiroop ; Das, Sabyasachi ; Saroy, Rajas.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ash:wpaper:1007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Does Affirmative Action in Politics Hinder Performance? Evidence from India. (2018). Mukhopadhyay, Abhiroop ; Das, Sabyasachi ; Saroy, Rajas.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ash:wpaper:03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Political activism as a determinant of clientelistic transfers: Evidence from an Indian public works program. (2017). Liu, Yanyan ; Chau, Nancy ; Soundararajan, Vidhya.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1700.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-23 05:08:50 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.