1. Dynamic Reference Point-Oriented Consensus Mechanism in Linguistic Distribution Group Decision Making Restricted by Quantum Integration of Information. (2022). Tan, Xiao ; Wu, Tong ; Zhu, Jianjun.
   In: Group Decision and Negotiation.
   RePEc:spr:grdene:v:31:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-022-09775-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Exploring the Ordinal Classifications of Failure Modes in the Reliability Management: An Optimization-Based Consensus Model with Bounded Confidences. (2022). Wang, Xiuli ; Xiao, Jing ; Zhang, Hengjie.
   In: Group Decision and Negotiation.
   RePEc:spr:grdene:v:31:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-021-09756-9.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. How to determine the consensus threshold in group decision making: a method based on efficiency benchmark using benefit and cost insight. (2022). Chao, Xiangrui ; Dong, Yucheng ; Peng, YI ; Kou, Gang.
   In: Annals of Operations Research.
   RePEc:spr:annopr:v:316:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03927-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Akiyama Y, Nolan J, Darrah M et al (2016) A method for measuring consensus within groups: an index of disagreement via conditional probability. Inf Sci 345:116–128.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2008) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 39(1):210–217.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Cadigan J, Schmitt P, Shupp R et al (2011) The holdout problem and urban sprawl: experimental evidence. J Urban Econ 69(1):72–81.

4. Cadigan J, Schmitt P, Swope SK (2009) An experimental study of the holdout problem in a multilateral bargaining game. South Econ J 76(2):444–457.

5. Charnes AW, Cooper W (1959) Chance-constrained programming. Manag Sci 1(6):73–79.

6. Chaudhuri A, Paichayontvijit T, So T (2015) Team versus individual behavior in the minimum effort coordination game. J Econ Psychol 47:85–102.

7. Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision-making. Knowl Based Syst 37(2013):528–540.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Chen SM, Cheng SH, Chiou CH (2016) Fuzzy multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology. Inf Fusion 27:215–227.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Chiclana F, Tapia García JM, Del Moral MJ et al (2013) A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in-group decision making. Inf Sci 221:110–123.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Dong QX, Cooper O (2016) A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus-reaching model for the group AHP decision making. Eur J Oper Res 250(2):521–530.

11. Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016b) Consensus reaching model in the complex and dynamic MAGDM problem. Knowl Based Syst 106(C):206–219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Erdamar B, García-Lapresta JL, Pérez-Román D et al (2014) Measuring consensus in a preference-approval context. Inf Fusion 17:14–21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Fedrizzi M, Fedrizzi M, Pereira RAM (1999) Soft consensus and network dynamics in-group decision-making. Int J Intell Syst 14(1):63–77.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Fu C, Yang SL (2010) The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 206(3):601–608.

15. Gong ZW, Xu XX, Li L et al (2015a) Consensus modeling with nonlinear utility and cost constraints. Knowl Based Syst 88(C):210–222.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Gong ZW, Xu XX, Lu FL et al (2015c) On consensus models with utility preferences and limited budget. Appl Soft Comput 35:840–849.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Herrera-Viedma E, García-Lapresta JL, Kacprzyk J et al (2011) Consensual processes. Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput 213(6):1217–1223.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Khalid A, Beg I (2016) Incomplete interval valued fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 348(5):15–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Khorshid S (2010) Soft consensus model based on coincidence between positive and negative ideal degrees of agreement under a group decision-making fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 37(5):3977–3985.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Liao HH, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ et al (2016) An enhanced consensus reaching process in-group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 329:274–286.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Liu BH, Shen YH, Zhang W et al (2015) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 245(1):209–225.

22. Liu J, Chan FTS, Li Y et al (2012) A new optimal consensus method with minimum cost in fuzzy group decision. Knowl Based Syst 35:357–360.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Liu Y, Liang C, Chiclana F et al (2017) A trust induced recommendation mechanism for reaching consensus in-group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 119(C):221–231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Menezes F, Pitchford R (2004) A model of seller holdout. Econ Theor 24(2):231–253.

25. Meng F, Chen X (2015) A new method for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 73:111–123.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Miceli TJ, Kathleen S (2012) Land assembly and the holdout problem under sequential bargaining. Am Law Econ Rev 14(2):372–390.

27. Miceli TJ, Sirmans CF (2006) The holdout problem, urban sprawl, and eminent domain. Soc Sci Electron Publ 16(3):309–319.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Palomares I, Estrella FJ, Martínez L et al (2014) Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf Fusion 20(15):252–271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Parreiras RO, Ekel PY, Morais DC (2012) Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multicriteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis Negot 21(2):153–183.

30. Qin Z (2017) Random fuzzy mean-absolute deviation models for portfolio optimization problem with htbird uncertainty. Appl Soft Comput 56:597–603.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Sakawa M, Matsui T (2013) Interactive fuzzy random two-level linear programming based on level sets and fractile criterion optimization. Inf Sci 238(7):163–175.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Tao ZF, Liu X, Chen HY et al (2015) Group decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations via cooperative games method. Comput Ind Eng 83:184–192.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Wan SP (2013) 2-Tuple linguistic hybrid arithmetic aggregation operators and application to multi-attribute group decision-making. Knowl Based Syst 45(3):31–40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Wan SP, Wang F, Dong JY (2016a) A novel group decision making method with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations for RFID technology selection. Appl Soft Comput 38(C):405–422.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Wan SP, Wang F, Lin LL et al (2016b) Some new generalized aggregation operators for triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 93(C):286–301.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Wang X, Li Y, Ma Z et al (2017) Robust optimization of structural-acoustic coupled system with random parameters. Aerosp Sci Technol 60:48–57.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Wang ZJ, Li KW (2015) A multi-step goal programming approach for group decision making with incomplete interval additive reciprocal comparison matrices. Eur J Oper Res 242(3):890–900.

38. Wibowo S, Deng H (2013) Consensus-based decision support for multi-criteria group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 66(4):625–633.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) Consensus reaching models of linguistic preference relations based on distance functions. Soft Comput 16(4):577–589.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2016) Managing consistency and consensus in-group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Omega 65(3):28–40.

41. Xia MM, Xu ZS (2013) Group decision making based on intuitionistic multiplicative aggregation operators. Appl Math Model 37(7):5120–5133.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Xu J, Wu Z (2011) A discrete consensus support model for multiple attribute group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 24(8):1196–1202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM (2013) Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Inf Sci 253:56–73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Xu YJ, Rui D, Wang HM (2017a) A dynamically weight adjustment in the consensus reaching process for group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Int J Syst Sci 48(6):1311–1321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Xu YJ, Sun H, Wang HM (2016b) Optimal consensus models for group decision making under linguistic preference relations. Int Trans Oper Res 23(6):1201–1228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Xu ZS (2013) Group decision-making model and approach based on interval preference orderings. Comput Ind Eng 64(3):797–803.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Chen X (2017) The 2-rank consensus reaching model in the multigranular linguistic multiple-attribute group decision-making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 99:1–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Zhang ZM, Wang C, Tian XD (2015) A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 86:77–101.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Fairness and Transparency in One-to-Many Bargaining with Complementarity: An Experimental Study. (2024). Mak, Vincent ; Zwick, Rami.
   In: Games.
   RePEc:gam:jgames:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:22-:d:1421563.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Private-led land assembly and urban consolidation: The relative influence of regulatory zoning mechanisms. (2023). Sun, Qian ; McFarlane, Nick ; Hurley, Joe.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723003708.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Redevelopment values in multi-family properties: Evidence from en bloc sales in Singapore. (2023). Sing, Tien Foo ; Ee, Liu.
   In: Journal of Housing Economics.
   RePEc:eee:jhouse:v:60:y:2023:i:c:s1051137723000190.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Politics and eminent domain: Evidence from the 1879 California constitution. (2023). Kanazawa, Mark.
   In: Explorations in Economic History.
   RePEc:eee:exehis:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s0014498323000402.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Experimental analysis of a land assembly mechanism. (2021). Chaturvedi, Rakesh ; Kanjilal, Kiriti.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:91:y:2021:i:c:s2214804321000203.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. A Multivariate Minimum Cost Consensus Model for Negotiations of Holdout Demolition. (2020). Liu, Yong ; Zhou, Ting ; Forrest, Jeffrey Yi-Lin.
   In: Group Decision and Negotiation.
   RePEc:spr:grdene:v:29:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-020-09683-1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Assembling land for urban revitalization in the presence of linchpin parcels and information asymmetries: An experimental investigation. (2020). Zillante, Arthur ; Seiler, Michael ; Read, Dustin C.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720301861.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Does owners’ purchase price affect rent offered? Experimental evidence. (2020). Hirota, Shinichi ; Suzuki-Loffelholz, Kumi ; Udagawa, Daisuke.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
   RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:25:y:2020:i:c:s221463501830282x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Land-assembly and externalities: How do positive post-development externalities affect land aggregation outcomes?. (2019). Portillo, Javier E.
   In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
   RePEc:eee:regeco:v:77:y:2019:i:c:p:104-124.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Whos holding out? An experimental study of the benefits and burdens of eminent domain. (2018). Winn, Abel ; McCarter, Matthew W.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:105:y:2018:i:c:p:176-185.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Addressing the Collective Action Problem in Multiple-purchaser PES: An Experimental Investigation of Negotiated Payment Contributions. (2018). Smith, Gregory ; Day, Brett.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:144:y:2018:i:c:p:36-58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Land Assembly without Eminent Domain: Laboratory Experiments of Two Tax Mechanisms. (2018). McCarter, Matthew ; Desantis, Mark ; Winn, Abel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ajw:wpaper:07001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. On the Rationale of Coercive Land Acquisitions. (2017). Karamjit, Kaur .
    In: Asian Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:16:n:5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Who’s Holding Out? An Experimental Study of the Benefits and Burdens of Eminent Domain. (2016). Winn, Abel ; McCarter, Matthew W.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0154mkt.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Can buyer “mobility” reduce aggregation failures in land-assembly?. (2016). Kitchens, Carl ; Isaac, R. ; Portillo, Javier E.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:95:y:2016:i:c:p:16-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Fair and efficient division through unanimity bargaining when claims are subjective. (2016). Kerschbamer, Rudolf ; Horn, Kristian ; Gantner, Anita.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:56-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Fairness and efficiency in a subjective claims problem. (2016). Kerschbamer, Rudolf ; Gantner, Anita.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:131:y:2016:i:pa:p:21-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Dealing with eminent domain. (2015). Kitchens, Carl ; Roomets, Alex.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:54:y:2015:i:c:p:22-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Land Aggregation Using Contingent and Guaranteed Payments. (2014). Zillante, Arthur ; Schwarz, Peter M ; Read, Dustin C.
    In: Southern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:wly:soecon:v:80:y:2014:i:3:p:702-727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Thats my final offer! Bargaining behavior with costly delay and credible commitment. (2014). Swope, Kurtis ; Cadigan, John ; Schmitt, Pamela.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:49:y:2014:i:c:p:44-53.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. A Group Utility Maximizer Mechanism for Land Assembly. (2013). Sridhar, Usha ; Mandyam, Sridhar.
    In: The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jrefec:v:47:y:2013:i:3:p:466-488.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Fairness and Efficiency in a Subjective Claims Problem. (2013). Kerschbamer, Rudolf ; Gantner, Anita.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2013-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Institutions and information in multilateral bargaining experiments. (2013). Swope, Kurtis ; Shupp, Robert ; Cadigan, John ; Robert, Shupp ; Schmitt Pamela M., ; John, Cadigan ; Swope Kurtis J., .
    In: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy.
    RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:13:y:2013:i:1:p:485-524:n:9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Bargaining behavior and the tragedy of the anticommons. (2012). Winn, Abel ; Parente, Michael D..
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:84:y:2012:i:2:p:475-490.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The holdout problem and urban sprawl: Experimental evidence. (2011). Swope, Kurtis ; Shupp, Robert ; Schmitt, Pamela ; Cadigan, John.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:69:y:2011:i:1:p:72-81.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Contracts, Behavior, and the Land-Assembly Problem:An Experimental Study. (2010). Swope, Kurtis ; Schmitt, Pamela ; Cadigan, John ; Wielgus, Ryan.
    In: Departmental Working Papers.
    RePEc:usn:usnawp:29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 03:04:12 || Missing content? Let us know