create a website

Citation analysis of Ph.D. theses with data from Scopus and Google Books. (2021). Donner, Paul.
In: Scientometrics.
RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04173-w.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 46

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Patterns of dissertation dissemination: publication-based outcomes of doctoral theses in the social sciences. (2024). Buenstorf, Guido ; Asanov, Igor ; Kadriu, Valon ; Schoch, Pia.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-024-04952-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Female early-career scientists have conducted less interdisciplinary research in the past six decades: evidence from doctoral theses. (2023). Bu, YI ; Yang, Sijie ; Zhang, Ning ; Liu, Meijun.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02392-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Algorithmic identification of Ph.D. thesis-related publications: a proof-of-concept study. (2022). Donner, Paul.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04480-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. Sage Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575 .

  2. Allison, P. D., & Long, J. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095801 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Chuadja, M. (2021). Promotionen an der Charité Berlin von 1998 bis 2015. Qualität, Dauer, Promotionstyp (Ph.D. thesis). Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Consortium for the National Report on Junior Scholars. (2017). 2017 National Report on Junior Scholars. Statistical Data and Research Findings on Doctoral Students and Doctorate Holders in Germany. Overview of Key Results. Retrieved from https://www.buwin.de/dateien/buwin-2017-keyresults.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Diekmann, A., Näf, M., & Schubiger, M. (2012). Die Rezeption (Thyssen-) preisgekrönter Artikel in der “Scientific Community.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 64(3), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-012-0175-4 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Donner, P. (2016). Enhanced self-citation detection by fuzzy author name matching and complementary error estimates. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23399 .

  9. Donner, P. (2020). A validation of coauthorship credit models with empirical data from the contributions of PhD candidates. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00048 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Evans, S. C., Amaro, C. M., Herbert, R., Blossom, J. B., & Roberts, M. C. (2018). “Are you gonna publish that?” Peer-reviewed publication outcomes of doctoral dissertations in psychology. PloS ONE,13(2), e0192219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192219 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. García-Pérez, M. A. (2010). Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2070–2085. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21372 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics, 61(3), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000045117.13348.b1 .

  13. Hay, A. (1985). Some differences in citation between articles based on thesis work and those written by established researchers: Human geography in the UK 1974–1984. Social Science Information Studies, 5(2), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-6236(85)90017-1 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Heinisch, D. P., & Buenstorf, G. (2018). The next generation (plus one): An analysis of doctoral student’s academic fecundity based on a novel approach to advisor identification. Scientometrics,117(1), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2840-5 .

  15. Heinisch, D. P., Koenig, J., & Otto, A. (2020). A supervised machine learning approach to trace doctorate recipient’s employment trajectories. Quantitative Science Studies,1(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Hemlin, S. (1996). Research on research evaluation. Social Epistemology, 10(2), 209–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691729608578815 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Hesli, V. L., & Lee, J. M. (2011). Faculty research productivity: Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others? PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000242 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Hilmer, C. E., & Hilmer, M. J. (2007). On the relationship between the student-advisor match and early career research productivity for agricultural and resource economics Ph.Ds. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(1), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00970.x .

  19. Hinze, S., Butler, L., Donner, P., & McAllister, I. (2019). Different processes, similar results? A comparison of performance assessment in three countries. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators (pp. 465–484). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_18 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Hochschulrektorenkonferenz. (2012). Zur Qualitätssicherung in Promotionsverfahren. Retrieved from https://www.hrk.de/positionen/beschluss/detail/zur-qualitaetssicherung-in-promotionsverfahren/ .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Jaeger, M. (2006). Leistungsbezogene Budgetierung an deutschen Universitäten - Umsetzung und Perspektiven. Wissenschaftsmanagement, 12(3), 32–38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Kim, K., & Karau, S. J. (2009). Working environment and the research productivity of doctoral students in management. Journal of Education for Business, 85(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903258535 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015). An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23170 .

  24. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2019). Can Google Scholar and Mendeley help to assess the scholarly impacts of dissertations? Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.009 .

  25. Larivière, V. (2012). On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge. Scientometrics, 90(2), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0495-6 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Larivière, V., Zuccala, A., & Archambault, É. (2008). The declining scientific impact of theses: Implications for electronic thesis and dissertation repositories and graduate studies. Scientometrics, 74(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0106-3 .

  27. Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2008). From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of early career researchers. Higher Education, 55(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Long, J. S., & McGinnis, R. (1985). The effects of the mentor on the academic career. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017149 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12(2), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7 .

  30. Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination $${R}^{2}$$ R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14(134), 20170213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Nederhof, A., & van Raan, A. (1987). Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics. Scientometrics, 11(5–6), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02279353 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Nederhof, A., & van Raan, A. (1989). A validation study of bibliometric indicators: The comparative performance of cum laude doctorates in chemistry. Scientometrics, 17(5–6), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017463 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Niggemann, F. (2020). Interne LOM und ZLV als Instrumente der Universitätsleitung. Qualität in der Wissenschaft, 14(4), 94–98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Oestmann, J. W., Meyer, M., & Ziemann, E. (2015). Medizinische Promotionen: Höhere wissenschaftliche Effizienz. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 112(42), A–1706/B–1416/C–1388.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Projektgruppe Indikatorenmodell. (2014). Indikatorenmodell für die Berichterstattung zum wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/Publikationen/Downloads-Hochschulen/indikatorenmodell-endbericht.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Rogge, J.-C., & Tesch, J. (2016). Wissenschaftspolitik und wissenschaftliche Karriere. In D. Simon, A. Knie, S. Hornbostel, & K. Zimmermann (Eds.), Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik (2nd ed., pp. 355–374). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05455-7_25 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2018). Prüfungen an Hochschulen 2017. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/Publikationen/Downloads-Hochschulen/pruefungen-hochschulen-2110420177004.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Vollmar, M. (2019). Neue Promovierendenstatistik: Analyse der ersten Erhebung 2017. WISTA - Wirtschaft und Statistik, 1, 68–80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Wespel, J., & Jaeger, M. (2015). Leistungsorientierte Zuweisungsverfahren der Länder: Praktische Umsetzung und Entwicklungen. Hochschulmanagement, 10(3+4), 97–105.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Wissenschaftsrat. (2002). Empfehlungen zur Doktorandenausbildung. Saarbrücken.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Wissenschaftsrat. (2004). Empfehlungen zu forschungs-und lehrförderlichen Strukturen in der Universitätsmedizin. Berlin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Wissenschaftsrat. (2007). Forschungsleistungen deutscher Universitäten und außeruniversitärer Einrichtungen in der Chemie. Köln.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Wissenschaftsrat. (2008). Forschungsleistungen deutscher Universitäten und außeruniversitärer Einrichtungen in der Soziologie. Köln.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Wissenschaftsrat. (2011). Ergebnisse des Forschungsratings Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik. Köln.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Wissenschaftsrat. (2012). Ergebnisse des Forschungsratings Anglistik und Amerikanistik. Köln.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Yoels, W. C. (1974). On the fate of the Ph.D. dissertation: A comparative examination of the physical and social sciences. Sociological Focus, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.1974.10570872 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Gender disparities in Russian academia: a bibliometric analysis. (2022). Pilkina, Marina ; Lovakov, Andrey.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04383-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Research articles promoted in embargo e-mails receive higher citations and altmetrics. (2022). Lemke, Steffen ; Rotgeri, Sophie ; Brede, Max ; Peters, Isabella.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04217-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Review of Organizational Ambidexterity Research. (2022). Kassotaki, Olga.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221082127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Building Knowledge in the Oil Market. (2022). Corzo, Teresa ; Martn-Bujack, Karin ; Figuerola-Ferretti, Isabel ; Paraskevopoulos, Ioannis.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440211068491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A Study of the Relation between Byline Positions of Affiliated/Non-Affiliated Authors and the Scientific Impact of European Universities in Times Higher Education World University Rankings. (2022). Kohus, Zsolt ; Demeter, Marton ; Kun, Laszlo ; Czako, Katalin ; Szigeti, Gyula Peter ; Lukacs, Eszter.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13074-:d:940333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Evenly Is Even Better? Digital Competitiveness and the Quality of Medical Research. (2022). Shin, Whan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11048-:d:906676.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Mapping Scientific Productivity Trends and Hotspots in Remdesivir Research Publications: A Bibliometric Study from 2016 to 2021. (2022). Ginindza, Themba G ; Ogunsakin, Ropo E ; Ebenezer, Oluwakemi ; Shapi, Michael ; Jordaan, Maryam A.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8845-:d:867926.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Policy interactions with research trajectories: The case of cyber-physical convergence in manufacturing and industrials. (2022). Shapira, Philip ; Bordoloi, Tausif ; Mativenga, Paul.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:175:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521007782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Do Negative Replications Affect Citations?. (2022). Reed, W. ; Coupé, Tom ; Coupe, Tom.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:22/16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Do Negative Replications Affect Citations?. (2022). Reed, W. ; Coupé, Tom ; Coupe, Tom.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:22/02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Core functions of Sustainable Human Resource Management. A hybrid literature review with the use of H‐Classics methodology. (2021). Piwowar-Sulej, Katarzyna ; Piwowarsulej, Katarzyna.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:29:y:2021:i:4:p:671-693.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Citations versus expert opinions: citation analysis of featured reviews of the American Mathematical Society. (2021). Smolinsky, Lawrence ; Sage, Daniel S ; Lercher, Aaron J ; Cao, Aaron.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03894-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Quoted speech in linguistics research article titles: patterns of use and effects on citations. (2021). Pearson, William S.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03827-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies. (2021). Schniedermann, Alexander.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04199-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Citation analysis of Ph.D. theses with data from Scopus and Google Books. (2021). Donner, Paul.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04173-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The impact of review articles in management and economics journal rankings and metrics. (2021). Fassin, Yves.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04160-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Are FT50 journals really leading? A comment on Fassin. (2021). Moussa, Salim.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04158-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Predictors of societal and professional impact of orthodontic research. A multivariate, scientometric approach. (2021). Rossi-Fedele, Giampiero ; Doramaci, Esma J.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04163-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Linguistic Diversity Index: A Scientometric Measure to Enhance the Relevance of Small and Minority Group Languages. (2021). Linkov, Vclav ; Oadoherty, Kieran ; Han, Gyuseog ; Choi, Eunsoo.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:21582440211009191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Performance Analysis of Hospitals in Australia and its Peers: A Systematic Review. (2021). Zelenyuk, Valentin ; Wang, Zhichao.
    In: CEPA Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:qld:uqcepa:155.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size. (2021). Isager, Peder Mortvedt ; Lakens, Daniel ; Van, Anna Elisabeth.
    In: MetaArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:metaar:knjea.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Meta-Research: How problematic citing practices distort science. (2021). Horbach, Serge ; Aagaard, Kaare ; Schneider, Jesper W.
    In: MetaArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:metaar:aqyhg.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Ranking Institutions within a Discipline: The Steep Mountain of Academic Excellence. (2021). Sziklai, Balázs.
    In: CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS.
    RePEc:has:discpr:2106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Universities’ Reporting on SDGs: Using THE Impact Rankings to Model and Measure Their Contribution to Sustainability. (2021). Merello, Paloma ; de la Poza, Elena ; Barbera, Antonio ; Celani, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2038-:d:499063.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Living Labs: From Niche to Mainstream Innovation Management. (2021). Leminen, Seppo ; de Vita, Riccardo ; Westerlund, Mika ; Greve, Katharina.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:791-:d:480733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction. (2021). Ekundayo, Temitope Cyrus ; Ojemaye, Mike O ; Semerjian, Lucy ; Okaiyeto, Kunle ; Okoh, Anthony I ; Igwaran, Aboi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11516-:d:659130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. (2021). Pranckut, Raminta.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:12-:d:515799.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. What should be rewarded? Gender and evaluation criteria for tenure and promotion. (2021). Sanz-Menendez, Luis ; Cruz-Castro, Laura.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:3:s1751157721000675.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts. (2021). Bornmann, Lutz ; Tekles, Alexander.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:3:s1751157721000304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The internationality of published higher education scholarship: How do the ‘top’ journals compare?. (2021). Mason, Shannon ; Roni, Saiyidi Mat ; Merga, Margaret K ; Gonzalez, Manuel S.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:2:s1751157721000262.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Ranking institutions within a discipline: The steep mountain of academic excellence. (2021). Sziklai, Balázs.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:2:s1751157721000043.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The inconsistency of h-index: A mathematical analysis. (2021). Brito, Ricardo ; Rodrigueznavarro, Alonso.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:1:s1751157720306234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Do Negative Replications Affect Citations?. (2021). Reed, W. ; Coupé, Tom ; Coupe, Tom.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:21/14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Fifteen Years of a PBRFS in New Zealand: Incentives and Outcomes. (2021). Creedy, John ; Buckle, Robert ; Ball, Ashley.
    In: Australian Economic Review.
    RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:54:y:2021:i:2:p:208-230.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The impact of the Italian Space Agency on scientific knowledge: Evidence from academic publications. (2021). Giunta, Anna ; Vurchio, Davide.
    In: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.
    RePEc:bla:annpce:v:92:y:2021:i:3:p:511-529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. What is meaningful research and how should we measure it?. (2020). Helmer, Sven ; Paschen, Kathrin ; Blumenthal, David B.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03649-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data. (2020). Amara, Nabil ; Rhaiem, Mehdi.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03633-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The impact of research output on economic growth by fields of science: a dynamic panel data analysis, 1980–2016. (2020). Teixeira, Aurora ; Pinto, Tania.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:123:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03419-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. (2020). Szomszor, Martin ; Adams, Jonathan ; Pendlebury, David A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:123:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03417-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Research article titles in written feedback on English as a second language writing. (2020). Pearson, William S.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:123:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03388-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. A long-term bibliometric analysis of journals influencing management accounting and control research. (2020). Berg, Terje ; Balstad, Marit Terese.
    In: Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung.
    RePEc:spr:jmgtco:v:30:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00187-019-00287-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review. (2020). Hug, Sven E ; Aeschbach, Mirjam.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:6:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-0412-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Deciding what to replicate: A formal definition of “replication value” and a decision model for replication study selection.. (2020). Perugini, Marco ; Desoto, Kurt Andrew ; Krueger, Joachim ; Ropovik, Ivan ; Van, Anna Elisabeth ; Bahnik, Tpan ; Giner-Sorolla, Roger ; Maria, Robbie Cornelis ; Isager, Peder Mortvedt ; Brandt, Mark John.
    In: MetaArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:metaar:2gurz.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Trade credit research before and after the global financial crisis of 2008 – A bibliometric overview. (2020). Pattnaik, Debidutta ; Kumar, Satish ; Hassan, M. Kabir ; Paul, Justin.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:54:y:2020:i:c:s0275531920304682.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The pace of artificial intelligence innovations: Speed, talent, and trial-and-error. (2020). Ding, Ying ; Bu, YI ; Tang, Xuli ; Li, Xin ; Song, Min.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:4:s1751157720301991.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio. (2020). de Moura, Rafael Vignoli ; de Carvalho, Helio Gomes ; Gomes, Gustavo Dambiski ; da Veiga, Claudimar Pereira ; Sokulski, Carla Cristiane ; de Francisco, Antonio Carlos ; da Silva, Wesley Vieira.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:3:s1751157719303682.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Quantification 2.0? Bibliometric Infrastructures in Academic Evaluation. (2020). Kruger, Anne K.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:58-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Peer review versus bibliometrics: Which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?. (2019). Abramo, Giovanni ; Reale, Emanuela ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:121:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03184-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. (Un)professionalisation or (Re)professionalisation of the Academic in the Brave New World?. (2019). Serpa, Sandro ; Sa, Maria Jose ; Ferreira, Carlos Miguel.
    In: Postmodern Openings.
    RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:10:y:2019:i:2:p:84-113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. The distinction machine: Physics journals from the perspective of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic. (2019). Katchanov, Yurij ; Markova, Yulia V ; Shmatko, Natalia A.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:13:y:2019:i:4:s1751157719303657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-06 03:43:20 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.