- Acock, A.C. A gentle introduction to Stata. 2018 Stata Press: College Station, TX, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Adams, J. ; Loach, T. ; Szomszor, M. Interdisciplinary research: Methodologies for identification and assessment. Do we know what we are measuring?. 2016 Digital Science: London, UK
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ahlgren, P. ; Colliander, C. ; Sjögårde, P. Exploring the relation between referencing practices and citation impact: A large‐scale study based on Web of Science data. 2018 Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69 728-743
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ahlgren, P. ; Waltman, L. The correlation between citation-based and expert-based assessments of publication channels: SNIP and SJR vs. Norwegian quality assessments. 2014 Journal of Informetrics. 8 985-996
Aksnes, D.W. ; Langfeldt, L. ; Wouters, P. Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. 2019 SAGE Open. 9 -
- Angeles, G. ; Cronin, C. ; Guilkey, D.K. ; Lance, P.M. ; Sullivan, B.A. Guide to longitudinal program impact evaluation. 2014 Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Anon, PRL showcases milestone papers. 2008 APS News. 17 1/6-
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Austin, P.C. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. 2011 Multivariate Behavioral Research. 46 399-424
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Azoulay, P. Small research teams ‘disrupt’ science more radically than large ones. 2019 Nature. 566 330-332
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Baccini, A. ; De Nicolao, G. Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise. 2016 Scientometrics. 108 1651-1671
Beaver, D.B. Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?. 2004 Scientometrics. 60 399-408
- Bornmann, L. Bibliometric indicators. 2019 En : Atkinson, P. ; Delamont, S. ; Cernat, A. ; Sakshaug, J.W. ; Williams, R. SAGE research methods foundations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bornmann, L. ; Daniel, H.-D. Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: An investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2009 Research Evaluation. 18 262-272
- Bornmann, L. ; Devarakonda, S. ; Tekles, A. ; Chacko, G. Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers. 2020 Quantitative Science Studies. 1 1242-1259
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bornmann, L. ; Devarakonda, S. ; Tekles, A. ; Chacko, G. Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: Meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019). 2020 Scientometrics. 123 1149-1155
- Bornmann, L. ; Tekles, A. Disruption index depends on length of citation window. 2019 El profesional de la información. 28 e280207-
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bornmann, L. ; Tekles, A. ; Zhang, H.H. ; Ye, F.Y. Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data. 2019 Journal of Informetrics. 13 -
Breusch, T.S. ; Pagan, A.R. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. 1979 Econometrica. 47 1287-1294
- Bu, Y. ; Waltman, L. ; Huang, Y. A multi-dimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications. 2021 Quantitative Science Studies. -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Caliendo, M. ; Kopeinig, S. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. 2008 Journal of Economic Surveys. 22 31-72
- Casadevall, A. ; Fang, F.C. Revolutionary science. 2016 mBio. 7 e00158-
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chen, C. Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. 2004 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101 5303-5310
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chunli, W. ; Zhenyue, Z. ; Dongbo, S. ; Jiang, L. Nobel-Prize-winning papers are significantly more highly-cited but not more disruptive than non-Prize-winning counterparts. 2020 En : iConference 2020 Proceedings. :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Colin Cameron, A. ; Miller, D.L. A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. 2015 The Journal of Human Resources. 50 317-372
- Cook, R.D. ; Weisberg, S. Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. 1983 Biometrika. 70 1-10
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dagostino, R.B. ; Belanger, A. ; Dagostino, R.B. A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. 1990 The American Statistician. 44 316-321
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dattalo, P. Determining sample size: Balancing power, precision, and practicality. 2008 Oxford University Press: USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Didegah, F. ; Thelwall, M. Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology. 2013 Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64 1055-1064
Falagas, M.E. ; Zarkali, A. ; Karageorgopoulos, D.E. ; Bardakas, V. ; Mavros, M.N. The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. 2013 PloS One. 8 -
- Ferretti, F. ; Pereira, Â.G. ; Vértesy, D. ; Hardeman, S. Research excellence indicators: Time to reimagine the ‘making of’?. 2018 Science & Public Policy. 45 731-741
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fok, D. ; Franses, P.H. Modeling the diffusion of scientific publications. 2007 Journal of Econometrics. 139 376-390
- Fortunato, S. ; Bergstrom, C.T. ; Börner, K. ; Evans, J.A. ; Helbing, D. ; Milojević, S. ; Barabási, A.-L. Science of science. 2018 Science. 359 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Foster, J.G. ; Rzhetsky, A. ; Evans, J.A. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. 2015 American Sociological Review. 80 875-908
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Funk, R.J. ; Owen-Smith, J. A dynamic network measure of technological change. 2017 Management Science. 63 791-817
- Gillmor, C.S. Citation characteristics of JATP literature. 1975 Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics. 37 1401-1404
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gingras, Y. ; Khelfaoui, M. Assessing the effect of the United States’ "citation advantage" on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database. 2018 Scientometrics. 114 517-532
Haddawy, P. ; Hassan, S.-U. ; Asghar, A. ; Amin, S. A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality. 2016 Journal of Informetrics. 10 162-173
- Hemlin, S. ; Allwood, C.M. ; Martin, B. ; Mumford, M.D. Introduction: Why is leadership important for creativity in science, technology, and innovation. 2013 En : Hemlin, S. ; Allwood, C.M. ; Martin, B. ; Mumford, M.D. Creativity and leadership in science, technology, and innovation. Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Iacus, S.M. ; King, G. ; Porro, G. Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. 2012 Political Analysis. 20 1-24
- Iribarren-Maestro, I. ; Lascurain-Sanchez, M.L. ; Sanz-Casado, E. Are multi-authorship and visibility related? Study of ten research areas at Carlos III university of Madrid. 2007 En : . Spanish Research Council (CSIC): Madrid, Spain
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jann, B. Why propensity scores should be used for matching. 2017 :
- Jappe, A. ; Pithan, D. ; Heinze, T. Does bibliometric research confer legitimacy to research assessment practice? A sociological study of reputational control, 1972-2016. 2018 PloS One. 13 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kuhn, T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 1962 University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lawani, S.M. Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. 1986 Scientometrics. 9 13-25
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lee, Y.-N. ; Walsh, J.P. ; Wang, J. Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact. 2015 Research Policy. 44 684-697
Leydesdorff, L. ; Wagner, C.S. ; Bornmann, L. The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations. 2014 Journal of Informetrics. 8 606-617
Leydesdorff, L. ; Wouters, P. ; Bornmann, L. Professional and citizen bibliometrics: Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators - A state-of-the-art report. 2016 Scientometrics. 109 2129-2150
- Liao, Y. ; Shen, Z.S. ; Yang, L.Y. Identification of milestone papers in physics via reference publication year spectroscopy. 2019 En : . :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Long, J.S. ; Freese, J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. 2014 Stata Press, Stata Corporation: College Station, TX, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lundberg, J. Lifting the crown - citation z-score. 2007 Journal of Informetrics. 1 145-154
Mariani, M.S. ; Medo, M. ; Zhang, Y.C. Identification of milestone papers through time-balanced network centrality. 2016 Journal of Informetrics. 10 1207-1223
- Merton, R.K. Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. 1957 American Sociological Review. 22 635-659
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Merton, R.K. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. 1973 University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mitchell, M.N. Interpreting and visualizing regression models using Stata. 2012 Stata Corporation: College Station, TX, USA
- Moed, H.F. Applied evaluative informetrics. 2017 Springer: Heidelberg, Germany
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mutz, R. Do we really need BIBLIO-metrics to evaluate individual researchers?. 2016 Infozine. -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Onodera, N. Properties of an index of citation durability of an article. 2016 Journal of Informetrics. 10 981-1004
- Onodera, N. ; Yoshikane, F. Factors affecting citation rates of research articles. 2014 Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66 739-764
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research, ; Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research, ; Development Organizations, ; Laboratory Assessments Board, ; Division on Engineering, ; Physical Sciences, ; National Research Council, Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations. 2012 The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Peters, H.P.F. ; van Raan, A.F.J. On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. 1994 Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45 39-49
- Puccio, G.J. ; Mance, M. ; Zacko-Smith, J. Creative leadership. Its meaning and value for science, technology, and innovation. 2013 En : Hemlin, S. ; Allwood, C.M. ; Martin, B. ; Mumford, M.D. Creativity and leadership in science, technology, and innovation. Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rowlands, I. What are we measuring? Refocusing on some fundamentals in the age of desktop bibliometrics. 2018 FEMS Microbiology Letters. 365 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ruscio, J. ; Seaman, F. ; D’Oriano, C. ; Stremlo, E. ; Mahalchik, K. Measuring scholarly impact using modern citation-based indices. 2012 Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 10 123-146
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schilling, M.A. ; Green, E. Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences. 2011 Research Policy. 40 1321-1331
- Schneider, J.W. ; Costas, R. Identifying potential “breakthrough” publications using refined citation analyses: Three related explorative approaches. 2016 Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68 709-723
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Seglen, P.O. The skewness of science. 1992 Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43 628-638
- Shadish, W.R. ; Cook, T.D. ; Campbell, D.T. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. 2002 Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sheskin, D. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. 2007 Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Shibayama, S. ; Wang, J. Measuring originality in science. 2019 Scientometrics. -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stanek, K.Z. How long should an astronomical paper be to increase its impact?. 2008 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- StataCorp, Stata statistical software: Release 15. 2017 Stata Corporation: College Station, TX, USA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tahamtan, I. ; Bornmann, L. Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature. 2018 Journal of Informetrics. 12 203-216
Tahamtan, I. ; Bornmann, L. Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?. 2018 Journal of Informetrics. 12 906-930
Tahamtan, I. ; Safipour Afshar, A. ; Ahamdzadeh, K. Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. 2016 Scientometrics. 107 1195-1225
- Thelwall, M. Web indicators for research evaluation: A practical guide. 2017 Morgan & Claypool: London, UK
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Thor, A. ; Bornmann, L. ; Haunschild, R. ; Leydesdorff, L. Which are the influential publications in the Web of Science subject categories over a long period of time? CRExplorer software used for big-data analyses in bibliometrics. 2021 Journal of Information Science. -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tregenza, T. Gender bias in the refereeing process?. 2002 Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 17 349-350
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Uzzi, B. ; Mukherjee, S. ; Stringer, M. ; Jones, B. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. 2013 Science. 342 468-472
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Valderas, J.M. Why do team-authored papers get cited more?. 2007 Science. 317 1496-
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- van Raan, A.F.J. Measuring science: Basic principles and application of advanced bibliometrics. 2019 En : Glänzel, W. ; Moed, H.F. ; Schmoch, U. ; Thelwall, M. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Vieira, E.S. ; Gomes, J.A.N.F. The bibliometric indicators as predictors of the final decision of the peer review. 2016 Research Evaluation. 25 170-183
Wagner, C.S. ; Whetsell, T.A. ; Mukherjee, S. International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination. 2019 Research Policy. 48 1260-1270
- Wainer, J. ; Eckmann, M. ; Rocha, A. Peer-selected “best papers” - are they really that “good”?. 2015 PloS One. 10 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wang, J. ; Lee, Y.-N. ; Walsh, J.P. Funding model and creativity in science: Competitive versus block funding and status contingency effects. 2018 Research Policy. 47 1070-1083
- Webster, G.D. ; Jonason, P.K. ; Schember, T.O. Hot topics and popular papers in evolutionary psychology: Analyses of title words and citation counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979-2008. 2009 Evolutionary Psychology. 7 348-362
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wesel, M. ; Wyatt, S. ; Haaf, J. What a difference a colon makes: How superficial factors influence subsequent citation. 2014 Scientometrics. 98 1601-1615
- Wilsdon, J. ; Allen, L. ; Belfiore, E. ; Campbell, P. ; Curry, S. ; Hill, S. ; Johnson, B. The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. 2015 Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE): Bristol, UK
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Winnink, J.J. ; Tijssen, R.J.W. ; van Raan, A.F.J. Breakout discoveries in science: What do they have in common?. 2016 En : Ràfols, I. ; Molas-Gallart, J. ; Castro-Martínez, E. ; Woolley, R. Proceedings of the 21. International Conference on Science and Technology Indicator. :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wray, K.B. Kuhn’s influence on the social sciences. 2017 En : McIntyre, L. ; Rosenberg, A. The Routledge companion to philosophy of social science. Routledge: London, UK
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wu, L. ; Wang, D. ; Evans, J.A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. 2019 Nature. 566 378-382
- Yu, T. ; Yu, G. Features of scientific papers and the relationships with their citation impact. 2014 Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 19 37-50
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ziman, J. "Postacademic science": Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. 1996 Science Studies. 9 67-80
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ziman, J. Real science. What it is, and what it means. 2000 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ziman, J.M. The problem of problem choice. 1987 Minerva. 25 92-106
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now