create a website

Efficiency of the Experimental Prediction Market: Public Information, Belief Evolution, and Personality Traits. (2021). Yang, Chih-Hwa ; Chie, Bin-Tzong.
In: Advances in Management and Applied Economics.
RePEc:spt:admaec:v:11:y:2021:i:4:f:11_4_3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 43

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. [1] Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utilities and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46, 1497–1512.

  2. [10] Deck, C., Lin, S. and Porter, D. (2013). Affecting policy by manipulating prediction markets: experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 85, 48–62.

  3. [11] Dreber, A., von Essen, E. and Ranehill, E. (2011). Outrunning the gender gap—boys and girls compete equally. Experimental Economics, 14, 567–582.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. [12] Ehmke, M. D. T. (2006). Dissertation abstract: The influence of culture on economic behavior with applications to food and the environment. Experimental Economics, 9, 167–168.

  5. [13] Figlewski, S. (1978). Market ‘efficiency’ in a market with heterogeneous information. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 581–597.

  6. [14] Figlewski, S. (1979). Subjective information and market efficiency in a betting market. The Journal of Political Economy, 87, 75–88.

  7. [15] Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178.

  8. [16] Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., Neumann, G. and Wright, J. (1992). Anatomy of an experimental political stock market. The American Economic Review, 82, 1142–1161.

  9. [17] Forsythe, R., Rietz, T. and Ross, T. (1999). Wishes, expectations and actions: a survey on price formation in election stock markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39, 83–110 Chie and Yang

  10. [18] Gjerstad, S. (2005). Risk aversion, beliefs, and prediction market equilibrium. Unpublished Manuscript, Economic Science Laboratory, University of Arizona.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. [19] Gresik, T. A. and Satterthwaite, M. A. (1989). The rate at which a simple market converges to efficiency as the number of traders increases: an asymptotic result for optimal trading mechanisms. Journal of Economic Theory, 48, 304–332.

  12. [2] Abdellaoui, M., Vossmann, F. and Weber, M. (2005). Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Science, 51, 1384–1399.

  13. [20] Griffith, R. M. (1949). Odds adjustments by American horse-race bettors. The American Journal of Psychology, 62, 290–294.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. [21] Hahn, R. W. and Tetlock, P. C. (2006). Information markets: a new way of making decisions, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.

  15. [22] Hanson, R. D. (2006). Designing real terrorism futures. Public Choice, 128, 257–274.

  16. [24] Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. [25] Hazen, T. L. (1987). Volatility and market inefficiency: a commentary on the effects of options, futures, and risk arbitrage on the stock market. Washington and Lee Law Review, 44, 789–805.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. [26] Isaacs, R. (1953). Optimal horse race bets. American Mathematical Monthly, 60, 310–315.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. [27] Knetsch, J., Tang, F. F. and Thaler, R. (2001). The endowment effect and repeated market trials: is the Vickrey auction demand revealing? Experimental Economics, 4, 257–269.

  20. [28] Loomes, G., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (2003). Do anomalies disappear in repeated markets? Economic Journal, 113, C153–C166.

  21. [29] Maloney, M. T. and Mulherin, J. H. (2003). The complexity of price discovery in an efficient market: the stock market reaction to the Challenger crash. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 453–479.

  22. [3] Ali, M. M. (1977). Probability and utility estimates for racetrack bettors. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 803–15.

  23. [30] Oechssler, J. (2012). Finitely repeated games with social preferences. Experimental Economics, doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9336-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. [31] Oliven, K. and Rietz, T. A. (2004). Suckers are born but markets are made: individual rationality, arbitrage, and market efficiency on an electronic futures market. Management Science, 50, 336–351.

  25. [32] Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R. and Van De Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171–188.

  26. [33] Ottaviani, M. and Sørensen, P. N. (2007). Outcome manipulation in corporate prediction markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 554– 563. Efficiency of the Experimental Prediction Market: Public Information,… 59

  27. [35] Roll, R. (1984). Orange juice and weather. American Economic Review, 74, 861–880.

  28. [36] Rosenberg, B., Reid, K. and Lanstein, R. (1985). Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management, 11, 9–16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. [37] Snowberg, E., Wolfers, J. and Zitzewitz, E. (2007). Partisan impacts on the economy: evidence from prediction markets and close elections. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 807–829.

  30. [38] Stott, H. P. (2006). Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 101–130.

  31. [39] Tufano, F. (2010). Are ‘true’ preferences revealed in repeated markets? an experimental demonstration of context-dependent valuations. Experimental Economics, 13, 1–13.

  32. [4] Ballinger, T. P., Hudson, E., Karkoviata, L. and Wilcox, N. T. (2011). Saving behavior and cognitive abilities. Experimental Economics, 14, 349–374.

  33. [40] Tversky, A. and Fox, C. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102, 269–283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. [41] Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.

  35. [42] Visser, M. S. and Roelofs, M. R. (2011). Heterogeneous preferences for altruism: gender and personality, social status, giving and taking. Experimental Economics, 14, 490–506.

  36. [43] Weitzman, M. (1965). Utility analysis and group behavior: an empirical study. Journal of Political Economy, 73, 18–26.

  37. [44] Wolfers, J. and Zitzewitz, E. (2004). Prediction markets. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 107–126.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. [45] Wu, G. and Gonzalez, R. (1996). Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Science, 42, 1676–1690.

  39. [5] Berg, J., Nelson, F. and Rietz, T. (2008). Prediction market accuracy in the long run. International Journal of Forecasting, 24, 285–300.

  40. [6] Camerer, C. F. and Ho, T. H. (1994). Nonlinear weighting of probabilities and violations of the betweenness axiom. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 167196.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. [7] Christiansen, J. D. (2007). Prediction markets: practical experiments in small markets and behaviours observed. The Journal of Prediction Markets, 1, 17– 41.

  42. [8] Costa, P. T. and McCrae Jr., R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. [9] Croson, R. and Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448–474.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Efficiency of the Experimental Prediction Market: Public Information, Belief Evolution, and Personality Traits. (2021). Yang, Chih-Hwa ; Chie, Bin-Tzong.
    In: Advances in Management and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:spt:admaec:v:11:y:2021:i:4:f:11_4_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Certainty Preference, Random Choice, and Loss Aversion: A Comment on Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. (2016). Vieider, Ferdinand.
    In: Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2016-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Heterogeneity in risk attitudes across domains: A bivariate random preference approach. (2015). Moffatt, Peter ; conte, anna ; Riddel, Mary.
    In: Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS).
    RePEc:uea:wcbess:15-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Civil Liability, Knight’s Uncertainty and Non-Dictatorial Regulator. (2015). Mondello, Gerard.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2015-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Ambiguous Beliefs on Damages and Civil Liability Theories. (2013). Mondello, Gerard.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00929948.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?. (2011). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Vieider, Ferdinand ; Lefebvre, Mathieu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:4:p:615-641.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Solving the St. Petersburg Paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting. (2011). pfiffelmann, marie.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:3:p:325-341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization. (2011). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:1:p:63-80.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Investment in antiviral drugs: a real options approach. (2010). Attema, Arthur ; Feenstra, Talitha L. ; Lugner, Anna K..
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:10:p:1240-1254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Safety and the Allocation of Costs in Large Accidents. (2010). LANGLAIS, Eric.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:25710.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation. (2010). Vetschera, Rudolf ; Wakolbinger, Lea ; Schwand, Christopher.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:69:y:2010:i:3:p:395-416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Individual fairness in Harsanyi’s utilitarianism: operationalizing all-inclusive utility. (2010). Trautmann, Stefan.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:4:p:405-415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. On probabilities and loss aversion. (2010). Zank, Horst.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:3:p:243-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory. (2010). Baucells, Manel ; Villasis, Antonio .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:193-211.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Endowment effects? “Even” with half a million on the table!. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:173-192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:159-171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Separating curvature and elevation: A parametric probability weighting function. (2010). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:41:y:2010:i:1:p:39-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses. (2010). Resende, Jose Lara ; Wu, George.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:40:y:2010:i:2:p:109-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. An Empirical Analysis of Choices Between Gambles of Children and Adults in China. (2010). Zhang, Jie ; Paya, Ivan ; Peel, David.
    In: Journal of Gambling Business and Economics.
    RePEc:buc:jgbeco:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:1-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Coordination after gains and losses: Is prospect theory’s value function predictive for games?. (2010). Krause, Kai Oliver ; Schade, Christian ; Schroeder, Andreas.
    In: Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:huscpw:59524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Distinguishing trust from risk: an anatomy of the investment game. (2009). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel ; Houser, Daniel.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:450.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Preference for Skew in Lotteries: Evidence from the Laboratory. (2009). Santos-Pinto, Luis ; Mata, José ; Astebro, Thomas.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:17165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Previous outcomes and reference dependence: A meta study of repeated investment tasks with and without restricted feedback. (2009). Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:16096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Is brain activity observable that leads to an evaluation of a probability of 0.5 that is different from 0.5 in binary lottery choices?. (2009). Munte, Thomas ; Morgenstern, Ralf ; Heldmann, Marcus ; Vogt, Bodo.
    In: FEMM Working Papers.
    RePEc:mag:wpaper:09003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The influence of fear in decisions: Experimental evidence. (2009). Chichilnisky, Graciela ; CHANEL, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:3:p:271-298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Probability weighting and the ‘level’ and ‘spacing’ of outcomes: An experimental study over losses. (2009). ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:1:p:45-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Attitudes toward Uncertainty among the Poor: Evidence from Rural Ethiopia. (2009). Trautmann, Stefan ; Martinsson, Peter ; Akay, Alpaslan ; Medhin, Haileselassie.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The shape of the utility function under risk in the loss domain and the ruinous losses hypothesis: some experimental results. (2009). ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Eliciting beliefs. (2008). Melkonyan, Tigran ; Chambers, Robert.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:65:y:2008:i:4:p:271-284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A Betting Market: Description and a Theoretical Explanation of Bets in Pelota Matches. (2008). Llorente, Loreto ; Aizpurua, Josemari.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:64:y:2008:i:2:p:421-446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. (2008). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Bleichrodt, Han ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:245-266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Are the Treasures of Game Theory Ambiguous?. (2008). Kelsey, David ; Eichberger, Jürgen.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Relationship Between Risk Attitudes and Heuristics in Search Tasks: A Laboratory Experiment. (2007). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenec:1377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Insights into Trader Behavior: Risk Aversion and Probability Weighting. (2007). Pennings, Joost ; Mattos, Fabio ; Garcia, Philip ; Pennings, Joost M. E., .
    In: 2007 Conference, April 16-17, 2007, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:nccsci:37569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Loss Aversion? Not with Half-a-Million on the Table!. (2006). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Averting risk in the face of large losses: Bernoulli vs. Tversky and Kahneman. (2006). Silvestre, Joaquim ; bosch-domènech, antoni ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:932.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk. (2006). Cillo, Alessandra ; Delquie, Philippe .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:33:y:2006:i:3:p:197-215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. De laversion à lambiguïté aux attitudes face à lambiguïté. Les apports dune perspective psychologique en économie. (2006). Cabantous, Laure ; Hilton, Denis.
    In: Revue économique.
    RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_572_0259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. What Drives Strategic Behavior? A Framework to Explain and Predict SMEs Transition to Sustainable Production Systems. (2006). Pennings, Joost ; Garcia, Philip ; Pennings, Joost M. E., ; Kalogeras, Nikos.
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes. (2005). Schunk, Daniel.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:05078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Relationship Between Risk Attitudes and Heuristics in Search Tasks: A Laboratory Experiment. (2005). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:05077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Consumer Choices Under Small Probabilities: Overweighting or Underweighting?. (2005). Chen, Rong ; Jia, Jianmin.
    In: Marketing Letters.
    RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:5-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Loss Averse Behavior. (2005). Brooks, Peter ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:31:y:2005:i:3:p:301-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. What is Loss Aversion?. (2005). Schmidt, Ulrich ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:30:y:2005:i:2:p:157-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Testing Prospect Theories Using Probability Tradeoff Consistency. (2005). Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Zhang, Jiao ; Wu, George.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:30:y:2005:i:2:p:107-131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Choices under ambiguity with familiar and unfamiliar outcomes. (2004). Fontini, Fulvio ; Chateauneuf, Alain ; Basili, Marcello.
    In: Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques.
    RePEc:mse:wpsorb:b04115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Framing and stakes: A survey study of decisions under uncertainty. (2004). Baucells, Manel ; Rata, Cristina .
    In: IESE Research Papers.
    RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty. (2003). Weber, Martin ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Vossman, Frank.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Testing Theories of Choice Under Risk: Estimation of Individual Functionals. (2002). Blondel, Serge.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:24:y:2002:i:3:p:251-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Choice under Uncertainty with the Best and Worst in Mind: Neo-additive Capacities. (2002). Grant, Simon ; Eichberger, Jürgen ; Chateauneuf, Alain.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ecl:riceco:2002-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-22 14:53:26 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.