Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46, 1497–1512.
- Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Measuring loss aversion: A parameter-free approach. Management Science, 53, 1659–1674.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Abdellaoui, M., Vossmann, F., & Weber, M. (2005). Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Science, 51, 1384–1399.
Baillon, A., l’Haridon, O., & Placido, L. (forthcoming). Ambiguity Models and the Machina Paradox. American Economic Review. Basili, M., Chateauneuf, A., & Fontini, F. (2005). Choices under ambiguity with familiar and unfamiliar outcomes. Theory and Decision, 58, 195–207.
Ballinger, T. P., & Wilcox, N. T. (1997). Decisions, error and heterogeneity. Economic Journal, 106, 1090–1105.
- Becker, S. W., & Brownson, F. O. (1964). What price ambiguity? Or the role of ambiguity in decision-making. Journal of Political Economy, 72, 62–73.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187–217.
Birnbaum, M. H., & McIntosh, W. R. (1996). Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 91–110.
Blavatskyy, P. (2007). Stochastic expected utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34, 259–286.
Camerer, C. F., & Ho, T.-H. (1994). Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 167–196.
Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital–labor–production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3, 7–42.
Camerer, C. F., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 325–370.
- Choquet, G. (1954). Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 5, 131–295.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chow, C. C., & Sarin, R. K. (2001). Comparative ignorance and the Ellsberg paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 129–139.
- Cohen, M., Jaffray, J.-Y., & Said, T. (1985). Individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty: An experimental study. Theory and Decision, 18, 203–228.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K., Nagode, J. C., Rustichini, A., Smith, K., & Pardo, J. V. (2003). The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 3536–3541.
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Decision making under ambiguity. Journal of Business, 59, S225–S250.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.
Etchart-Vincent, N. (2004). Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3, 217–235.
Fischer, G. W., Carmon, Z., Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (1999). Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect. Management Science, 45, 1057–1075.
- Fox, C. R., & See, K. E. (2003). Belief and preference in decision under uncertainty. In D. Hardman & L. Macchi (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making (pp. 273–314). New York: Wiley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603.
Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1998). A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Science, 44, 879–895.
Fox, C. R., & Weber, M. (2002). Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance and decision context. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 476–498.
- Frisch, D., & Baron, J. (1988). Ambiguity and rationality. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1, 149–157.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gilboa, I. (1987). Expected utility with purely subjective nonadditive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 65–88.
- Goldstein, W. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 94, 236–254.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 129–166.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Harless, D. W., & Camerer, C. F. (1994). The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica, 62, 1251–1290.
Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 5–28.
- Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 383–403.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hey, J. D. (1995). Experimental investigations of errors in decision-making under risk. European Economic Review, 39, 633–640.
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1990). Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Science, 36, 780–803.
- Kahn, B. E., & Sarin, R. K. (1988). Modelling ambiguity in decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 265–272.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
- Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kilka, M., & Weber, M. (2001). What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Science, 47, 1712–1726.
Lattimore, P. K., Baker, J. K., & Witte, A. D. (1992). The influence of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17, 377–400.
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1998). Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice. Economica, 65, 581–598.
- Macchi, L., Osherson, D., & Krantz, D. M. (1999). A note on superadditive probability judgment. Psychological Review, 106, 210–214.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Machina, M. J. (2009). Risk, ambiguity, and the rank-dependence axioms. American Economic Review, 99, 385–392.
- Maxwell, A. E. (1970). Comparing the classification of subjects by two independent judges. British Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 651–655.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66, 497–527.
Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323–343.
- Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Gibbs, S. E. B., Khanna, K., Nielsen, L., Carstensen, L. L., & Knutson, B. (2007). Anticipation of monetary gain but not loss in healthy older adults. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 787–791.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57, 571–587.
- See, K. E. (2009). Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: Reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 104–118.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stott, H. (2006). Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 101–130.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stuart, A. (1955). A test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions in a two-way classification. Biometrika, 42, 412–416.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Taylor, K. A. (1995). Testing credit and blame attributions as explanation for choices under ambiguity. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 64, 128–137.
Thaler, R., & Johnson, E. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36, 643–660.
Trautmann, S. T., Vieider, F. M., & Wakker, P. P. (2008). Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 225–243.
- Tversky, A., & Fox, C. R. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102, 269–283.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
- Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probabilities. Psychological Review, 101, 547–567.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tversky, A., & Wakker, P. (1995). Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica, 63, 1255–1280.
- Wakker, P. P. (1990). Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical. Theory and Decision, 29, 119–132.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wakker, P. P. (2004). On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psychological Review, 111, 236–241.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wilcox, N. T. (2008). Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: A critical primer and econometric comparison. In J. C. Cox & G. W. Harrison (Eds.), Risk aversion in experiments; research in experimental economics (Vol. 12, pp. 197–292). Bingley: Emerald.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1996). Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Science, 42, 1676–1690.
Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1999). Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management Science, 45, 74–85.
- Wu, G., & Markle, A. B. (2008). An empirical test of gain–loss separability in prospect theory. Management Science, 54, 1322–1335.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now