1. Investigating the Effect of Nudges on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Corn Oil. (2022). Hashemzadeh, Houman ; Mohammadi, Hosein ; Boccia, Flavio ; Karbasi, Alireza ; Firoozzare, Ali.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12705-:d:934671.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Ballotpedia. 2013. “Washington Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Engineered Food Measure, Initiative 522.” https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Mandatory_Labeling_of_Genetically_Engineered_Food_Measure,_Initiative_522_(2013).
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Blamey, Russell K., Mick S. Common, and John C. Quiggin. 1995. Respondents to Contingent Valuation Surveys: Consumers or Citizens? Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39(3): 263–288 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00554.x.

3. Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan. 1994. Information and Opinion Change on Ballot Propositions. Political Behavior 16(4): 411–435 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498825.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Bredahl, Lone, Klaus G. Grunert, and Lynn J. Frewer. 1998. Consumer Attitudes and Decision‐Making with Regard to Genetically Engineered Food Products–A Review of the Literature and a Presentation of Models for Future Research. Journal of Consumer Policy 21(3): 251–277 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006940724167.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Brooks, Kathleen R., and Jayson L. Lusk. 2012. Public and Private Preferences for Animal Cloning Policies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 37(3): 485–501. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.142359.

6. Colson, Gregory, and Wallace E. Huffman. 2011. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Foods with Product‐Enhancing Nutritional Attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(2): 358–363 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq103.

7. Costa‐Font, Montserrat, Jose M. Gil, and W. Bruce Traill. 2008. Consumer Acceptance, Valuation of and Attitudes towards Genetically Modified Food: Review and Implications for Food Policy. Food Policy 33(2): 99–111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002.

8. Dannenberg, Astrid. 2009. The Dispersion and Development of Consumer Preferences for Genetically Modified Food—a Meta‐Analysis. Ecological Economics 68(8/9): 2182–2192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.008.

9. Elway Poll. 2013. “I‐522: Support for Food Labeling Initiative Swings Negative 41 Points Since September.” October 21, 2013. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/808500-elway-poll.html.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Frewer, Lynn J., Chaya Howard, and Richard Shepherd. 1998. The Influence of Initial Attitudes on Responses to Communication about Genetic Engineering in Food Production. Agriculture and Human Values 15(1): 15–30 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007465730039.

11. Frewer, Lynn J., Joachim Scholderer, and Lone Bredahl. 2003. Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust. Risk Analysis 23(6): 1117–1133 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00385.x.

12. Hamilton, Stephen F., David L. Sunding, and David Zilberman. 2003. Public Goods and the Value of Product Quality Regulations: The Case of Food Safety. Journal of Public Economics 87(3): 799–817 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00103-7.

13. Hanemann, W. Michael. 1983. Marginal Welfare Measures for Discrete Choice Models. Economics Letters 13(2–3): 129–136 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(83)90074-5.

14. Hu, Wuyang, Michele M. Veeman, and Wiktor L. Adamowicz. 2005. Labelling Genetically Modified Food: Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Value of Information. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d'agroeconomie 53(1): 83–102 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.04004.x.

15. Huffman, Wallace E., and Abebayehu Tegene. 2002. Public Acceptance of and Benefits from Agricultural Biotechnology: a Key Role for Verifiable Information. In Market Development for Genetically Modified Foods, ed. V. Santaniello, Robert E. Evenson, and David Zilberman, 179–190. Wallingford: CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995731.0179.

16. Huffman, Wallace E., Matthew Rousu, Jason F. Shogren, and Abebayehu Tegene. 2007. The Effects of Prior Beliefs and Learning on consumers' Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63(1): 193–206 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.019.

17. Izrael, David, D. C. Hoaglin, and M. P. Battaglia. 2000. “A SAS macro for balancing a weighted sample.” Paper presented at the SAS Users Group International conference 25, Indianapolis, IN, April 9–12, 2000. http://www.academia.edu/download/40624159/sasbalancingweighted.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Kimenju, Simon Chege, and Hugo De Groote. 2008. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Food in Kenya. Agricultural Economics 38(1): 35–46 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00279.x.

19. Lancaster, Kelvin J. 1966. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. The Journal of Political Economy 74(2): 132–157 https://doi.org/10.1086/259131.

20. Liaukonyte, Jura, Nadia A. Streletskaya, and Harry M. Kaiser. 2015. The Long‐Term Impact of Positive and Negative Information on Food Demand. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d'agroeconomie 63(4): 539–562 https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12074.

21. Lupia, Arthur. 1994. The Effect of Information on Voting Behavior and Electoral Outcomes: An Experimental Study of Direct Legislation. Public Choice 78(1): 65–86 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053366.

22. Lusk, Jayson L., and Stephan Marette. 2010. Welfare Effects of Food Labels and Bans with Alternative Willingness to Pay Measures. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 32(2): 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppp013.

23. Lusk, Jayson L., Brandon R. McFadden, and Norbert Wilson. 2018. Do Consumers Care how a Genetically Engineered Food Was Created or Who Created it? Food Policy 78: 81–90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.007.

24. Lusk, Jayson L., Lisa O. House, Carlotta Valli, Sara R. Jaeger, Moore Melissa, J. Morrow, and W. Bruce Traill. 2004. Effect of Information about Benefits of Biotechnology on Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: Evidence from Experimental Auctions in the United States, England, and France. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31(2): 179–204 https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/31.2.179.

25. Lusk, Jayson L., Mustafa Jamal, Lauren Kurlander, Maud Roucan, and Lesley Taulman. 2005. A Meta‐Analysis of Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(1): 28–44. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.30782.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Matsumoto, Shigeru. 2006. Consumers' Valuation of GMO Segregation Programs in Japan. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 38(1): 201–211 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800022161.

27. Muller, Julie M. 2015. Naturally Misleading: FDA's Unwillingness to Define Natural and the Quest for GMO Transparency through State Mandatory Labeling Initiatives. Suffolk University Law Review 48(2): 511–536.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Noussair, Charles, Stephane Robin, and Bernard Ruffieux. 2004. Do Consumers Really Refuse to Buy Genetically Modified Food? The Economic Journal 114(492): 102–120 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.00179.x.

29. Nyborg, Karine. 2000. Homo Economicus and Homo Politicus: Interpretation and Aggregation of Environmental Values. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 42(3): 305–322 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00091-3.

30. Rousu, Matthew, Wallace E. Huffman, Jason F. Shogren, and Abebayehu Tegene. 2004. Estimating the Public Value of Conflicting Information: The Case of Genetically Modified Foods. Land Economics 80(1): 125–135 https://doi.org/10.2307/3147148.

31. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2016. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. An experiment on the vote-buy gap with application to cage-free eggs. (2019). Tonsor, Glynn ; Norwood, Bailey ; Lusk, Jayson ; Paul, Andrew S.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:79:y:2019:i:c:p:102-109.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The value of travel time, noise pollution, recreation and biodiversity: A social choice valuation perspective. (2019). Dekker, Thijs ; van Cranenburgh, Sander ; Mouter, Niek ; Cabral, Manuel Ojeda.
   In: Research in Transportation Economics.
   RePEc:eee:retrec:v:76:y:2019:i:c:s0739885919300721.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Do individuals have different preferences as consumer and citizen? The trade-off between travel time and safety. (2017). van Cranenburgh, Sander ; Mouter, Niek ; van Wee, Bert.
   In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
   RePEc:eee:transa:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:333-349.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Assessing the Determinants of Renewable Electricity Acceptance Integrating Meta-Analysis Regression and a Local Comprehensive Survey. (2015). Polinori, Paolo ; Bigerna, Simona.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:9:p:11909-11932:d:54869.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages?. (2015). Börger, Tobias ; Hadjimichael, Maria ; Atkins, Jonathan P ; Burdon, Daryl ; Hattam, Caroline ; Bohnke-Henrichs, Anne ; Delaney, Alyne ; Borger, Tobias ; Garrard, Samantha ; Austen, Melanie C.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:120:y:2015:i:c:p:126-138.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Consumer and citizen roles and motives in the valuation of agricultural genetic resources in Finland. (2015). Ahtiainen, Heini ; Pouta, Eija ; Tienhaara, Annika.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:114:y:2015:i:c:p:1-10.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Consumer vs. citizen willingness to pay for restaurant food safety. (2014). Alfnes, Frode ; Alphonce, Roselyne ; Sharma, Amit.
   In: Food Policy.
   RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:49:y:2014:i:p1:p:160-166.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Willingness to pay of committed citizens: A field experiment. (2014). Luchini, Stéphane ; CHANEL, Olivier ; Aprahamian, Frédéric ; Joule, Robert-Vincent.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:105:y:2014:i:c:p:31-39.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. An Empirical Study of the Determinants of Green Party Voting. (2014). Schumacher, Ingmar.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:105:y:2014:i:c:p:306-318.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Adjusting for Cultural Differences in International Benefit Transfer. (2013). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Norton, Daniel.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:56:y:2013:i:4:p:499-519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Reconsidering the political economy of farm animal welfare: An anatomy of market failure. (2013). Harvey, David ; Hubbard, Carmen.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:38:y:2013:i:c:p:105-114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Terrorist threats, information disclosures, and consumer sovereignty. (2013). Smith, V. ; Klaiber, Henry ; Mansfield, Carol.
    In: Information Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:25:y:2013:i:4:p:225-234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distributional Preferences. (2012). Bennett, Jeff ; Scarborough, Helen.
    In: Books.
    RePEc:elg:eebook:14376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Can altruism stabilise international climate agreements?. (2012). Weikard, Hans-Peter ; van Ierland, Ekko ; van der Pol, Thomas.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:81:y:2012:i:c:p:112-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Public and Private Preferences for Animal Cloning Policies. (2012). Lusk, Jayson ; Brooks, Kathleen.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:142359.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Choice Experiment Framing and Incentive Compatibility: observations from public focus groups. (2010). Rogers, Abbie ; Cleland, Jonelle .
    In: Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports.
    RePEc:een:eenhrr:1076.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Forest stakeholders value preferences in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. (2010). Kant, Shashi ; Kijazi, Martin Herbert .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:5:p:357-369.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Willingness to pay, attitudes and fundamental values -- On the cognitive context of public preferences for diversity in agricultural landscapes. (2010). Sauer, Uta ; Fischer, Anke.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2010:i:1:p:1-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. The citizen versus consumer distinction: An exploration of individuals preferences in Contingent Valuation studies. (2010). O'Donoghue, Cathal ; Hynes, Stephen ; Howley, Peter.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:7:p:1524-1531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Choice Experiment Framing and Incentive Compatibility: observations from public focus groups. (2010). Rogers, Abbie ; Cleland, Jonelle .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:eerhrr:107575.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The citizen versus consumer hypothesis: Do welfare estimates differ?. (2009). O'Donoghue, Cathal ; Hynes, Stephen ; Howley, Peter ; Odonoghue, Cathal.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tea:wpaper:0911.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Reconsidering Heterogeneity and Aggregation Issues in Environmental Valuation: A Multi-attribute Approach. (2008). Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:40:y:2008:i:4:p:551-570.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Willingness to Pay of Committed Citizens: A Field Experiment. (2008). CHANEL, Olivier ; Aprahamian, Frédéric ; Luchini, Stephane ; Joule, Robert-Vincent.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00289451.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Preferences for multiple use forest management in Ireland: Citizen and consumer perpectives. (2007). Hynes, Stephen ; van Rensburg, Tom M. ; Mill, Greig Andrew ; Dooley, Conor .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:60:y:2007:i:3:p:642-653.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A Box-Cox Double-Hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizens perspective. (2006). Martinez-Espineira, Roberto.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:58:y:2006:i:1:p:192-208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. A Test for the Presence of Genuine or Pure Altruistic Motives in Non-Market Valuation: A Case Study Using Choice Modeling. (2005). Suh, J. & Harrison, S., .
    In: Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:qld:uq2004:338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Dynamic Processes in the Contingent Valuation of an Endangered Mammal Species. (2005). Wilson, Clevo ; Nantha, Hemanath Swarna .
    In: Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:uqseee:55064.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Consumer versus citizen preferences in contingent valuation: evidence on the role of question framing. (2005). Ovaskainen, Ville ; Kniivila, Matleena.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:118585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Australasian environmental economics: contributions, conflicts and ‘cop-outs’. (2005). Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:118501.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A Box-Cox double-hurdle model of wildlife valuation: the citizen’s perspective.. (2004). Martinez-Espineira, Roberto.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0410003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Willingness to pay for Agricultural Environmental Safety. (2004). Nijkamp, Peter ; Travisi, Chiara M..
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20040070.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Environmental Safety: Evidence from a Survey of Milan, Italy, Residents. (2004). Travisi, Chiara ; Nijkamp, Peter.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2004.100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Are Italians Willing to Pay for Agricultural Environmental Safety? A Stated Choice Approach. (2004). Travisi, Chiara ; Nijkamp, Peter.
    In: 84th Seminar, February 8-11, 2004, Zeist, The Netherlands.
    RePEc:ags:eaae84:24988.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. On the relation between preference and choice. (2003). Sagoff, Mark.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:31:y:2003:i:6:p:587-598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Costs and benefits of forest conservation: regional and local comparisons in Eastern Finland. (2002). Ovaskainen, Ville ; Saastamoinen, Olli ; Kniivila, Matleena.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:8:y:2002:i:2:p:131-150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Preferences and multiple use forest management. (2002). van Rensburg, Tom M. ; Common, Mick ; Lovett, Jon ; Mill, Greig A..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:43:y:2002:i:2-3:p:231-244.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Homo Economicus and Homo Politicus: interpretation and aggregation of environmental values. (2000). Nyborg, Karine.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:42:y:2000:i:3:p:305-322.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Economics for sustainable rural systems. (2000). Midmore, Peter ; Whittaker, Julie.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:35:y:2000:i:2:p:173-189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. I struggled with this money business: respondents perspectives on contingent valuation. (2000). Clark, Judy ; Burgess, Jacquelin ; Harrison, Carolyn M..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:33:y:2000:i:1:p:45-62.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. FACTORS INFLUENCING SUPPORT FOR RURAL LAND USE CONTROL: A CASE STUDY. (1999). Woirhaye, Jody ; McLeod, Donald M. ; Menkhaus, Dale J..
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:31497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Choice modelling: assessing the environmental values of water supply options. (1999). Blamey, Russell ; Chapman, Ross ; Gordon, Jenny.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:117163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Valuing Indigenous Biodiversity. (1999). Alexander, Robert R. ; Krausse, Michael .
    In: 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand.
    RePEc:ags:aare99:123828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Decisiveness, attitude expression and symbolic responses in contingent valuation surveys. (1998). Blamey, Russell K..
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:34:y:1998:i:4:p:577-601.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Resource Economists Should Do More Cost Analysis and Less Benefit Analysis. (1998). McKenney, Daniel.
    In: Working Papers in Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:anu:wpieep:9801.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Testing the validity of responses to contingent valuation questioning. (1998). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Blamey, Russell ; Morrison, Mark.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:117226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. SUPPORT FOR RURAL LAND USE CONTROLS: PREFERENCES IN SUBLETTE COUNTY, WYOMING. (1998). Woirhaye, Jody ; McLeod, Donald M. ; Menkhaus, Dale J..
    In: 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT.
    RePEc:ags:aaea98:20822.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Do existence values for cost benefit analysis exist?. (1997). Blamey, R. ; Common, M. ; Reid, I..
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:9:y:1997:i:2:p:225-238.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The environment and the ethics of discounting: An empirical analysis. (1997). Lumley, Sarah .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:20:y:1997:i:1:p:71-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. The citizen versus consumer hypothesis: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. (1997). mcconnell, kenneth ; Curtis, John.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:118070.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. RESPONDENTS TO CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS: CONSUMERS OR CITIZENS (BLAMEY, COMMON AND QUIGGIN, AJAE 39:3) - A COMMENT. (1996). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Rolfe, John.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:ags:ajaeau:22393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 12:38:24 || Missing content? Let us know