This document has not been cited yet.

1. Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J.J., Williams, M. (1994). Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Mehtods for Valuing Environmental Amenities, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26:271-292.

2. Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louviere, J.J., Williams, M. (1996). Perceptions versus Objective Measurement of Environmental Valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32: 65-84.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Armstrong P., Garrido, R., OrtUzar (2001). Confidence intervals to bound the value of time. Transportation Research, PartE 37(2-3): 143-161.

4. Baker, G. (1999). Consumer preferences for food safety attributes in fresh apples: market segments, consumer characteristics and marketing opportunities. Journal ofAgricultural and Resource Economics, 24(1): 80-97.

5. Baker, G.A.C., Crosbie, P.J. (1993). Measuring food safety preferences: identifying consumers segments. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18: 277-287.

6. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, SR. (1986). Discrete Choice Analisi: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Blamey, R.K., Common, MS., Quiggin, J. (1995). Respondents to Contingent Valuation Surveys: Consumers or Citizens?, Australian Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 39(3) :263-288.

8. Brethour, C. A., Weersink, A. (2001). An Economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction. Agricultural Economics, 25: 2 19-226.

9. Bunch, D.S., Louviere, J.J., Anderson, D. (1993). A Comparison of Experimental Design Strategies for Multinomial Logit Models: The Case of Generic Attributes. Working Paper.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Buzby J.C., Ready R.C., Skees, J.R. (1995). Contingent Valuation in Food Policy Analysis: A Case Study of a Pesticide Residue Risk Reduction, Journal ofAgricultural and Applied Economics, 27(2): 6 13-625.

11. Cuyno, L. C. M., Norton, G. W., Rola A. (2001). Economic analysis of environmental benefits of integrated pest management: a Philippine case study. Agricultural Economics, 25: 227-23 3.

12. Diamond, PA., Hausman, J.A. (1994). Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than Non Number?, Journal of Economics Perspectives, 8(4): 45-64.

13. Eom, Y. 5. (1994). Pesticide Residue Risk and food Safety Valuation: A Random Utility Approach. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 76: 760-771.

14. Foster V., Mourato, 5. (2000). Valuing the Multiple Impacts of Pesticides Use in the UK: A Contingent Ranking Approach. Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 51: 1-21.

15. Fu T-T, Liu J-T, Hammitt, J.K. (1999). Consumer willingness to pay for low-pesticide fresh produce in Taiwan, Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 50(2): 220-233. Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., Rabin, J. (1 998b). Predicting Consumer Risk Aversion to Synthetic Pesticide Residues: A Logistic Analysis. New Brunswick, Department of Agricultural Economics, The State University of New Jersey, Rutgers.

16. Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., Rabin, J.. (1998a). Consumer response and perceptions of integrated pest managenet produce. New Brunswick, Department of Agricultural Economics, The State University of New Jersey, Rutgers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Hammitt, J. K. (1990). Risk Perceptions and Food Choice: An Exploraty Analysis of Organic-Versus Conventional - Produce Buyers, Risk Analysis, 10: 367-374.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Hensher, D. A., Jonhnson, L. W. (1981). Applied Discrete Choice Modelling. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Higley, L. G., Wintersteen, W.K. (1992). A novel approach to environmental risk assessment of pesticides as a basis for incorporating environmental costs into economic injury level. American Entomologist, 38: 34-39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Lancaster, K. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory, Journal of Political Economy, 74: 132-157.

21. Lazari, AG., Anderson, D.A. (1994). Design of Discrete Choice Set Experiments for Estimating Both Attribute and Availability Cross Effects, Journal ofMarketing Research, 31: 375-383.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Louvier, J.J., Hensher, D.A. (1982). On the Design and Analysis od Simulated Choice or Alocation Experiments in Travel Choice Modelling, Transportation Research Record, 890:11-17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Louvier, J.J., Woodworth, G. (1983). Design and Analysis of Simulated Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 20: 350-367. `7 Louviere J. J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.D. (2000). Stated choice methods; analysis and applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

24. Maler, KG. (1974). Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. McFadden, D. (1986). The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research, Marketing Science, 5: 275-297.

26. McFadden, D. (1994). Contingent Valuation and Social Choice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76: 689-708.

27. McFadden, D. Train, K., Tye, W.B. (1977). An Application of Diangostinc Tests for the Independence from Irrelevant Alternatives Property of the Multinomial Logit Model, Transportation Research Record, 637: 39-45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Misra, 5K., Huang, CL., Ott, S.L. (1991). Consumer Willingness to Pay for Pesticide-Free Fresh Produce, Western Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 16: 218-227.

29. Mitchell, R. and Carson, R. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Morrison, M.D., Bennett, J.W. (1997). Water Use Trade-offs in the Macquarie and Gwydir Valleys. Choice Modelling Research Report No.2, School of Economics and Management, University College, The University of New South Wales.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E., Foster, V. (2000). Evaluating health and environmental impacts of pesticide use: implications for the design of ecolabels and taxes, Environmental Science & Technology, 34(8), 1456-1461.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Mullen J.D., Norton G.W., Reaves, D.W. (1997). Economic Analysis of Environmental benefits of Integrated Pest Management, Journal ofAgricultural and Applied Economics, 29(2): 243-253.

33. Opaluch, J.J., Swallow, 5K., Weaver, T., Wessells, W. Wichelns, D. (1993). Evaluating Impacts from Noxious Facilities: Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24: 41-59.

34. Pimentel, D., Acquay, H., Biltonen, M., Rice, P., Silve, M., Nelson, J., Lipner, V., Giordano, S., Horowitz, A., Damore, M. (1992). Environmental and human costs of pesticide use. Bioscience 42: 750-760.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Pimentel, D., Greiner, A. (1997). Environmental and socio-economic costs of pesticide use. In Pimentel, D. (eds), Techniques for reducing pesticide use: economics and environmental benefIts. Chinchester: John Wiley and Sons, 5 1-78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Press J., S., SOderqvist, T. (1998). On estimating the benefits of groundwater protection: a contingent valuation study in Milan. In Swanson T., Vighi M. (Eds), Regulating Chemical Accumulation in the Environment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Ravenswaay van , E.O., Hoehn, J.P. (1991a). Contingent Valuation and Food Safety: the case of pesticides residues. Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Staff Paper N. 91-13. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Rizzi, L. I., OrtUzar, J. D. (2003). Stated preferences in the valuation of interurban road safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention 25(1): 9-22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Schou, J. S., Hasler, B., Kaltoft, P. (2002). Valuing biodiversity effects of pesticide use. What does perception of uncertainty mean for survey design?, Conference Proceedings. Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Resource Economics, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. Stevens, T. H., Echevarria, J., Glass, R. J., Hager, T. and More, T. A. (1991). Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?, Land Economics, 67(4), 390-400.

1. Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics. (2014). Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:i:4:p:717-745.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The impact of policy elements on the financing costs of RE investment: The case of wind power in Germany. (2011). Giebel, Olaf ; Breitschopf, Barbara.
   In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
   RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s112011.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny ; Stithou, Mavra.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ags:semrui:148928.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
   In: Agricultural Economics Review.
   RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
   In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
   RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models. (2008). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:umn:wpaper:0803.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Natural disturbances and natural hazards in mountain forests: a framework for the economic valuation. (2008). Notaro, Sandra ; Paletto, Alessandro.
   In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:trn:utwpde:0808.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
   In: IFPRI discussion papers.
   RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Van Houtven, George L. ; Gelso, Brett R..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
    RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:25:y:2006:i:4:p:855-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. DOES THE CONSUMERS VARIETY-SEEKING BEHAVIOR CONDITION THE WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL FURTHER?. (2006). Nicolau, Juan.
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. (2005). Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Bech, Mickael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:10:p:1079-1083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. (2005). Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A RANDOM PARAMETER LOGIT APPROACH TO THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAYS AND LENGTH OF STAY. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, Håkan ; Olsson, Bjorn .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael ; Provencher, Bill.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Effects of distance on non-use values. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple‐format, stated‐preference approach. (2000). Desvousges, William H. ; JOHNSON, REED F. ; Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Combining averting behavior and contingent valuation data: an application to drinking water treatment. (2000). Nunes, Luis ; Ducla-Soares, Maria M. ; ROSADO, MARCIA A. ; Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A., .
    In: Nova SBE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models. (2000). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heteregeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. (2000). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:263-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. What do doctors want? developing incentives for doctors to serve in Indonesias rural and remote areas. (1998). Widiyarti, ; Ismail, Nusye ; Chomitz, Kenneth M. ; Setiadi, Gunawan ; Azwar, Azrul.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Air Quality in Hamilton-Wentworth: A Choice Experiment. (1997). .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1997-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. (1996). Englin, Jeffrey ; Cameron, Trudy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 15:21:38 || Missing content? Let us know