Arbatskaya, M. N., & Baye, M. R. (2004). Are prices ‘sticky’ online? Market structure effects and asymmetric responses to cost shocks in online mortgage markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(10), 1443–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.11.001.
Ayllon, S., & Radicic, D. (2019). Product innovation, process innovation and export propensity: Persistence, complementarities and feedback effects in Spanish firms. Applied Economics, 51(33), 3650–3664. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1584376.
Benchekroun, H., & Martinherran, G. (2016). The impact of foresight in a transboundary pollution game. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(1), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.11.014.
Benchekroun, H., Martinherran, G., & Taboubi, S. (2009). Could myopic pricing be a strategic choice in marketing channels? A game theoretic analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33(9), 1699–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2009.03.005.
Blinder, A. S. (1991). Why are prices sticky? Preliminary results from an interview study. The American Economic Review, 81(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3646.
Cellini, R., & Lambertini, L. (2007). A differential oligopoly game with differentiated goods and sticky prices. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 1131–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.013.
Cellini, R., & Lambertini, L. (2009). Dynamic R&D with spillovers: Competition vs cooperation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33(3), 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2008.08.006.
Chenavaz, R. (2012). Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(3), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.009.
Chintagunta, P. K., & Rao, V. R. (1996). Pricing strategies in a dynamic duopoly: A differential game model. Management Science, 42(11), 1501–1514. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1501.
Fershtman, C., & Kamien, M. I. (1987). Dynamic duopolistic competition with sticky prices. Econometrica, 55(5), 1151–1164. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911265.
Futagami, K., Matsumura, T., & Takao, K. (2017). Mixed duopoly: differential game approach. Discussion Papers in Economics and Business.
Gil‐Moltó, M. J., Poyago‐Theotoky, J., & Zikos, V. (2011). R&D subsidies, spillovers, and privatization in mixed markets. Southern Economic Journal, 78(1), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-78.1.233.
Gil‐Moltó, M. J., Poyago‐Theotoky, J., Rodrigues‐Neto, J. A., & Zikos, V. (2020). Mixed oligopoly, cost‐reducing research and development, and privatisation. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(6), 1094–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.071.
Kamien, M. I., & Tauman, Y. (1986). Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 101.
- Kamien, M. I., Oren, S. S., & Tauman, Y. (1992). Optimal licensing of cost‐reducing innovation. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 21(5), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(92)90036-7.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 562–583.
Lambertini, L., & Mantovani, A. (2009). Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: A dynamic approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(4), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.12.005.
Lambertini, L., & Orsini, R. (2015). Quality improvement and process innovation in monopoly: A dynamic analysis. Operations Research Letters, 43(4), 370–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2015.04.009.
Lambertini, L., & Palestini, A. (2018). Voluntary export restraints in a trade model with sticky price: Linear and nonlinear feedback solutions. Dynamic Games and Applications, 8(3), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-018-0251-0.
Lambertini, L., Orsini, R., & Palestini, A. (2017). On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.030.
- Lee, Y., Chen, H., & Kung, S. (2008). Sticky prices, adjustment costs, and cost‐reducing uncertainty in the presence of R&D joint ventures. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 19(4), 691–716.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Li, S. (2018). Dynamic control of a multiproduct monopolist firm's product and process innovation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(5), 714–733. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0260-1.
Li, S., & Ni, J. (2016). A dynamic analysis of investment in process and product innovation with learning‐by‐doing. Economics Letters, 145, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.05.031.
Lin, P. (2004). Process and product R&D by a multiproduct monopolist. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpf065.
- Liu, G., Sethi, S. P., & Zhang, J. (2016). Myopic vs. far‐sighted behaviours in a revenue‐sharing supply chain with reference quality effects. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1334–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1068962.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Liu, G., Zhang, J., & Tang, W. (2015). Strategic transfer pricing in a marketing–operations interface with quality level and advertising dependent goodwill. Omega, 56, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.004.
Lu, F., Tang, W., Liu, G., & Zhang, J. (2019). Cooperative advertising: A way escaping from the prisoner's dilemma in a supply chain with sticky price. Omega, 86, 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.003.
Martinherran, G., Taboubi, S., & Zaccour, G. (2012). Dual role of price and myopia in a marketing channel. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(2), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.12.015.
Ni, J., & Li, S. (2019). When better quality or higher goodwill can result in lower product price: A dynamic analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1452535.
- Nie, P. Y., & Yang, Y. (2020). Cost‐reduction innovation under mixed economy. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41, 1195–1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3165.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pan, X., & Li, S. (2016). Dynamic optimal control of process–product innovation with learning by doing. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.007.
Piga, C. A. (2000). Competition in a duopoly with sticky price and advertising. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00030-7.
Popescu, I., & Wu, Y. (2007). Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Operations Research, 55(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0393.
Poyago‐Theotoky, J., & Teerasuwannajak, K. T. (2020). Endogenous research and development spillovers and asymmetric firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41, 1282–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3174.
Saha, S. (2007). Consumer preferences and product and process R&D. The Rand Journal of Economics, 38(1), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2007.tb00054.x.
Sandal, L. K., & Steinshamn, S. I. (2004). Dynamic Cournot‐competitive harvesting of a common pool resource. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(9), 1781–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.003.
- Simaan, M. A., & Takayama, T. (1978). Game theory applied to dynamic duopoly problems with production constraints. Automatica, 14(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(78)90022-5.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Taboubi, S., & Zaccour, G. (2002). Impact of retailer's myopia on channel's strategies. Adv. Comput. Manag. Sci., 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1047-5_11.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Utterback, J. M. (1975). Dynamics model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7.
- Wang, Y., Wang, X., Chang, S., & Kang, Y. (2019). Product innovation and process innovation in a dynamic Stackelberg game. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 51, 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.042.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zhong, G., & Zhou, C. (2020). Product and process innovation: The implication of making comparisons between uniform pricing monopolist and second‐degree price discriminating monopolist. Applied Economics, 52, 4557–4572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1737642.