- Share via
Even before America became a country, Americans already had a habit of freaking out about even minor violations of abstract principles.
“In other countries, the people … judge of an ill principle in government only by an actual grievance,” observed Edmund Burke, the great British statesman and philosopher, in 1775. But in America, “they anticipate the evil, and judge of the pressure of the grievance by the badness of the principle. They augur misgovernment at a distance; and snuff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze.”
America’s obsession with slippery slopes used to frustrate me. I support gun rights but bans on machine guns or bump stocks do not overly trouble me. I’m a passionate defender of parental rights, but child abuse is intolerable. I think political speech is inviolate, but obscenity laws are fine by me.
The response to such nuance was often, “If the government can do this, what’s to stop it from doing [insert something much, much worse].”
My answer was usually “us” — i.e. Americans. Voters, politicians, intellectuals, et al. can make distinctions based on context, reason and culture that still respect a principle. The trick, however, requires respecting the principle, even when inconvenient.
In the last month, the president has sent troops — now armed — into the District of Columbia ostensibly to combat an ill-defined crime “emergency.” Because of D.C.’s special constitutional status, he has the authority to do so. But he’s already talking about taking the show on the road to Chicago, Baltimore and New York, all cities that just happen to be run by Democrats.
The D.C. gambit — following an earlier scheme in L.A. — is partly intended to force Democrats to talk about crime (which they are very bad at). But it also seems intended to normalize using the army on American soil, at the whim of the president, an idea that is directly contrary to the law and the constitutional order.
The Trump administration has acquired a 10% stake of Intel and wants more such “deals.” It raided the home of a prominent critic, John Bolton, without much explanation. Annoyed by commentary from former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, the president threatened to re-open a criminal investigation in which Christie was already cleared of wrongdoing. Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics for releasing data he did not like, and fired the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency allegedly for a preliminary finding that contradicted his claims of military success (this on the heels of earlier Pentagon purges).
Trump successfully ordered a pliant Texas Republican governor and Legislature — elected officials who do not answer to the federal government — to redraw state maps to produce more Republican-friendly districts. He has declared he will lead an effort to dictate how elections are conducted — a function he has no legal or constitutional authority over — on the grounds that the states are merely “agents” of the federal government.
Since taking office, Trump has lawlessly defied Congress’s explicit instruction to force the sale or termination of the Chinese spyware social media app, TikTok. Last week, the White House opened a TikTok account.
Democrats have raised alarms about this hardly exhaustive list. They are obviously correct about the GOP’s staggering hypocrisy. If a Democratic president did any of these things, Republican outrage would be biblical.
But the issue is bigger than that.
For my entire adult life, when conservatives raised concerns about the government intruding on constitutional rules and norms, Democrats (and the media) almost invariably responded with contemptuous eye-rolling and mockery. This is one of the reasons the new right no longer cares much about those rules and norms. They’ve convinced themselves that the left only cares about such things when they constrain Republicans.
Contempt breeds more contempt. “Norms for thee, unrestrained power for me” is a surefire way to destroy all norms.
I’m not saying that what Trump is doing isn’t worse than what Democrats did — or wanted to do but failed at. But in our politics, the ratchet effect always leads to ever greater violations, in part because each side wildly exaggerates the other’s transgressions.
Point out that Trump is weaponizing the justice system or profiting off government, the reply is “they did it first.” There’s some truth there. But when Democrats did such things, Republicans shrieked that it was wrong. Now one team’s wrongness is justification for even more wrongness.
Partisanship is not new. But partisans used to respect the rules as a way to ensure they were followed when their team was out of power. That’s what has been lost: the idea that the rules should apply to your team, too.
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
Americans have historically possessed an exceptional sensitivity to government overreach, anticipating tyranny even in minor violations of constitutional principles rather than waiting for actual harm to manifest. This foundational characteristic distinguishes American political culture from other nations where citizens typically respond only to concrete grievances.
The current administration has deployed armed military forces within Washington D.C. under the pretext of addressing a vaguely defined crime emergency, while simultaneously discussing expansion of such operations to Democratic-controlled cities like Chicago, Baltimore, and New York. This represents a dangerous normalization of military deployment on American soil at presidential discretion.
A pattern of authoritarian behavior has emerged through various government actions: acquiring stakes in private companies like Intel, conducting unexplained raids on political critics like John Bolton, threatening to reopen cleared criminal investigations against former officials like Chris Christie, and firing agency heads who produce unfavorable data or findings.
Constitutional boundaries are being systematically violated through federal interference in state functions, including successfully pressuring Texas officials to redraw electoral maps and declaring federal authority over election procedures despite lacking legal or constitutional grounds to do so.
Republican hypocrisy has reached staggering levels, as the party that once championed constitutional constraints now tolerates behavior they would have condemned if performed by Democratic leaders. This abandonment of principle stems partly from years of Democratic dismissal of conservative concerns about government overreach.
The breakdown of shared respect for constitutional norms creates a destructive “ratchet effect” where each side justifies increasingly severe violations by pointing to the other’s transgressions, ultimately eroding the foundational principle that rules should apply equally regardless of partisan control.
Different views on the topic
Conservative voices argue that the left poses the primary threat to American liberty through systematic campaigns of cultural intimidation and fear, suggesting that concerns about current Republican actions pale in comparison to broader liberal assaults on freedom[1].
Historical precedent demonstrates that both major parties have engaged in procedural hypocrisy regarding congressional mechanisms, with Democratic leadership having previously used reconciliation procedures more extensively than Republicans while later condemning similar tactics when employed by the opposing party[2].
More From the Los Angeles Times
Podcasts
LA is legally required to have detailed fire evacuation plans, but doesn’t. LA Times reporter Noah Haggerty joins Kate Cagle to discuss his investigation into the city’s dangerous lack of preparation.
The six-part podcast Pandora’s Box: The Fall of L.A.’s Sheriff explores how an FBI investigation into inmate abuse and a high-level cover-up triggered the downfall of once-popular lawman Lee Baca.
L.A. is known for its smog. Air quality is better, but the fight for clean air isn’t over. Sammy Roth & Patt Morrison discuss the city’s smog history & the path to a clean future.
