11.challenging issues of spatio temporal data mining

Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1719 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2863 (Online)
Vol 3, No.4, 2012

Challenging Issues of Spatio-Temporal Data Mining
A.N.M. Bazlur Rashid1* Md. Anwar Hossain2
1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Comilla University, Comilla, Bangladesh
2. Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Pabna Science and Technology
University, Pabna, Bangladesh
* E-mail of the corresponding author: bazlur.cse@cou.ac.bd

Abstract

The spatio-temporal database (STDB) has received considerable attention during the past few years, due to
the emergence of numerous applications (e.g., flight control systems, weather forecast, mobile computing,
etc.) that demand efficient management of moving objects. These applications record objects’ geographical
locations (sometimes also shapes) at various timestamps and support queries that explore their historical
and future (predictive) behaviors. The STDB significantly extends the traditional spatial database, which
deals with only stationary data and hence is inapplicable to moving objects, whose dynamic behavior
requires re-investigation of numerous topics including data modeling, indexes, and the related query
algorithms. In many application areas, huge amounts of data are generated, explicitly or implicitly
containing spatial or spatiotemporal information. However, the ability to analyze these data remains
inadequate, and the need for adapted data mining tools becomes a major challenge. In this paper, we have
presented the challenging issues of spatio-temporal data mining.
Keywords: database, data mining, spatial, temporal, spatio-temporal

1. Introduction

Classical data mining techniques often perform poorly when applied to spatial and spatio-temporal data sets
because of the many reasons. First, these dataset are embedded in continuous space, whereas classical
datasets (e.g. transactions) are often discrete. Second, patterns are often local where as classical data mining
techniques often focus on global patterns. Finally, one of the common assumptions in classical statistical
analysis is that data samples are independently generated. When it comes to the analysis of spatial and
spatio-temporal data, however, the assumption about the independence of samples is generally false
because such data tends to be highly self correlated. For example, people with similar characteristics,
occupation and background tend to cluster together in the same neighborhoods. In spatial statistics this
tendency is called autocorrelation. Ignoring autocorrelation when analyzing data with spatial and spatio-
temporal characteristics may produce hypotheses or models that are inaccurate or inconsistent with the data
set.
In application areas such as robotics, computer vision, mobile computing, and traffic analysis, huge
amounts of data are generated and stored in databases, explicitly or implicitly containing spatial or
spatiotemporal information. For instance, the proliferation of location-aware devices gives rise to vast
amounts of frequently updated telecommunication and traffic data, and satellites generate terabytes of
image data daily. These huge collections of spatiotemporal data often hide possibly interesting information
and valuable knowledge. It is obvious that a manual analysis of these data is impossible, and data mining
might provide useful tools and technology in this setting. Spatiotemporal data mining is an emerging
research area that is dedicated to the development of novel algorithms and computational techniques for the
successful analysis of large spatiotemporal databases and the disclosure of interesting knowledge in

55

Vol 3, No.4, 2012

spatiotemporal data. However, the ability to analyze these data remains inadequate and the need for adapted
data mining tools becomes a major challenge.

Spatio-Temporal Databases (STDB) explores recent trends in flexible querying and reasoning about time-
and space-related information in databases. It shows how flexible querying enhances standard querying
expressiveness in many different ways, with the aim of facilitating extraction of relevant data and
information. Flexible spatial and temporal reasoning denotes qualitative reasoning about dynamic changes
in the spatial domain, characterized by imprecision or uncertainty (or both).
Spatio-temporal databases need to support a wide variety of continuous spatio-temporal queries. For
example, a continuous spatio-temporal range query may have various forms depending on the mutability of
objects and queries. In addition, a range query may ask about the past, present, or the future. A naive way to
process continuous spatio-temporal queries is to abstract the continuous queries into a series of snapshot
queries. Snapshot queries are issued to the server (e.g., a location-aware server) every T seconds. The naive
approach incurs redundant processing where there may be only a slight change in the query answer between
any two consecutive evaluations [1, 2, 3].
The reminder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents an architecture of data mining.
Section 3 and 4 briefly illustrate the spatial and temporal data mining respectively. Section 5 describes the
spatio-temporal data mining. A conclusion is given in Section 6.

2. An Architecture of Data Mining
Data mining, the extraction of hidden predictive information from large databases, is a powerful new
technology with great potential to help companies focus on the most important information in their data
warehouses. Data mining tools predict future trends and behaviors, allowing businesses to make proactive,
knowledge-driven decisions. The automated, prospective analyses offered by data mining move beyond the
analyses of past events provided by retrospective tools typical of decision support systems. Data mining
tools can answer business questions that traditionally were too time consuming to resolve. They scour
databases for hidden patterns, finding predictive information that experts may miss because it lies outside
their expectations.
To best apply these advanced techniques, they must be fully integrated with a data warehouse as well as
flexible interactive business analysis tools. Many data mining tools currently operate outside of the
warehouse, requiring extra steps for extracting, importing, and analyzing the data. Furthermore, when new
insights require operational implementation, integration with the warehouse simplifies the application of
results from data mining. The resulting analytic data warehouse can be applied to improve business
processes throughout the organization, in areas such as promotional campaign management, fraud
detection, new product rollout, and so on. Figure 1 illustrates an architecture for advanced analysis in a
large data warehouse.
The ideal starting point is a data warehouse containing a combination of internal data tracking all customer
contact coupled with external market data about competitor activity. Background information on potential
customers also provides an excellent basis for prospecting. This warehouse can be implemented in a variety
of relational database systems: Sybase, Oracle, Redbrick, and so on and should be optimized for flexible
and fast data access.
An OLAP (On-Line Analytical Processing) server enables a more sophisticated end-user business model to
be applied when navigating the data warehouse. The multidimensional structures allow the user to analyze
the data as they want to view their business – summarizing by product line, region, and other key
perspectives of their business. The Data Mining Server must be integrated with the data warehouse and the
OLAP server to embed ROI-focused business analysis directly into this infrastructure. An advanced,
process-centric metadata template defines the data mining objectives for specific business issues like
campaign management, prospecting, and promotion optimization. Integration with the data warehouse
enables operational decisions to be directly implemented and tracked. As the warehouse grows with new

56

Vol 3, No.4, 2012

decisions and results, the organization can continually mine the best practices and apply them to future
decisions.

This design represents a fundamental shift from conventional decision support systems. Rather than simply
delivering data to the end user through query and reporting software, the Advanced Analysis Server applies
users’ business models directly to the warehouse and returns a proactive analysis of the most relevant
information. These results enhance the metadata in the OLAP Server by providing a dynamic metadata
layer that represents a distilled view of the data. Reporting, visualization, and other analysis tools can then
be applied to plan future actions and confirm the impact of those plans.

3. Spatial Database
Spatial data mining is the process of discovering interesting and previously unknown, but potentially useful
patterns from large spatial datasets. Extracting interesting and useful patterns from spatial datasets is more
difficult than extracting the corresponding patterns from traditional numeric and categorical data due to the
complexity of spatial data types, spatial relationships, and spatial autocorrelation.
A spatial database contains objects which are characterized by a spatial location and/or extension as well as
by several non-spatial attributes. Figure 2 illustrates a spatial database on Bavaria as an example. Depicted
is the relation Communities containing polygons which represent communities in a geographic information
system. This spatial database on Bavaria - referred to as the BAVARIA database. The database contains the
ATKIS 500 data and the Bavarian part of the statistical data obtained by the German census of 1987, i.e.
2043 Bavarian communities with one spatial attribute (polygon) and 52 non-spatial attributes (such as
average rent or rate of unemployment). Also included (in a separate table of the database) are spatial objects
representing natural objects like mountains or rivers and infrastructure such as highways or railroads. The
total number of spatial objects in the database then amounts to 6924.
The discovery process for spatial data is more complex than for relational data. This applies to both the
efficiency of algorithms as well to the complexity of possible patterns that can be found in a spatial
database. The reason is that, in contrast to mining in relational databases, spatial data mining algorithms
have to consider the neighbours of objects in order to extract useful knowledge. This is necessary because
the attributes of the neighbours of some object of interest may have a significant influence on the object
itself.

4. Temporal Database
Temporal data stored in a temporal database is different from the data stored in non-temporal database in
that a time period attached to the data expresses when it was valid or stored in the database. Conventional
databases consider the data stored in it to be valid at time instant now, they do not keep track of past or
future database states. By attaching a time period to the data, it becomes possible to store different database
states.
A first step towards a temporal database thus is to timestamp the data. This allows the distinction of
different database states. One approach is that a temporal database may timestamp entities with time
periods. Another approach is the timestamping of the property values of the entities. In the relational data
model, tuples are timestamped, where as in object-oriented data models, objects and/or attribute values may
be timestamped. What time period do we store in these timestamps? There are mainly two different notions
of time which are relevant for temporal databases. One is called the valid time, the other one is the
transaction time. Valid time denotes the time period during which a fact is true with respect to the real
world. Transaction time is the time period during which a fact is stored in the database. Note that these two
time periods do not have to be the same for a single fact. Imagine that we come up with a temporal database
storing data about the 18th century. The valid time of these facts is somewhere between 1700 and 1799,
where as the transaction time starts when we insert the facts into the database, for example, January 21,

57

Vol 3, No.4, 2012

1998.
Assume we would like to store data about our employees with respect to the real world. Then, the result
appears as like in Table 1.
The above valid-time table stores the history of the employees with respect to the real world. The attributes
ValidTimeStart and ValidTimeEnd actually represent a time interval which is closed at its lower and open at
its upper bound. Thus, we see that during the time period [1985 - 1990), employee John was working in the
research department, having a salary of 11000. Then he changed to the sales department, still earning
11000. In 1993, he got a salary raise to 12000. The upper bound INF denotes that the tuple is valid until
further notice. Note that it is now possible to store information about past states. We see that Paul was
employed from 1988 until 1995. In the corresponding non-temporal table, this information was (physically)
deleted when Paul left the company.

4.1 Different Forms of Temporal Databases
The two different notions of time - valid time and transaction time - allow the distinction of different forms
of temporal databases. A historical database stores data with respect to valid time, a rollback database stores
data with respect to transaction time. A bitemporal database stores data with respect to both valid time and
transaction time.
Commercial DBMS are said to store only a single state of the real world, usually the most recent state.
Such databases usually are called snapshot databases. A snapshot database in the context of valid time and
transaction time is depicted in Figure 3.
On the other hand, a bitemporal DBMS such as TimeDB stores the history of data with respect to both valid
time and transaction time. Note that the history of when data was stored in the database (transaction time) is
limited to past and present database states, since it is managed by the system directly which does not know
anything about future states.
A table in the bitemporal relational DBMS TimeDB may either be a snapshot table (storing only current
data), a valid-time table (storing when the data is valid wrt. the real world), a transaction-time table (storing
when the data was recorded in the database) or a bitemporal table (storing both valid time and transaction
time). An extended version of SQL allows specifying which kind of table is needed when the table is
created. Existing tables may also be altered (schema versioning). Additionally, it supports temporal queries,
temporal modification statements and temporal constraints.
The states stored in a bitemporal database are sketched in Figure 4. Of course, a temporal DBMS such as
TimeDB does not store each database state separately as depicted in Fig. 4. It stores valid time and/or
transaction time for each tuple, as described above.

5. Spatio-Temporal Database
Depending on the temporal aspects of data, a STDB aims at either historical or predictive retrieval.
Specifically, given a set of objects o1, o2, . . . , oN (where N is termed the cardinality), a historical STDB
stores, for each object oi (1 ≤ i ≤ N), its extent oi.E(t) at all the timestamps t in the history. Following the
convention of spatial databases, each extent oi.E(t) can be a polygon describing the object’s actual shape at
time t (e.g., the contour of a moving typhoon). Specially, if the shape is not important (e.g., cars, flights,
etc.), oi.E(t) degenerates to a point describing the location of oi at time t. In practice, the extents of the same
object at the successive timestamps can be compressed using various methods (e.g., if the object remains
stationary at several continuous timestamps, its extent is stored only once during this period). A predictive
STDB, on the other hand, stores, for each (usually point) object oi, its most recent updated location
oi.L(tupd) (where tupd is the time of the object’s last update), and the motion function describing its current
movement. The most popular motion function is the linear function [4, 5], because it (i) can approximate
any trajectory, and (ii) requires the fewest number of parameters. Specifically, in addition to oi.L(tupd), the
system only needs to record the object’s velocity oi.vel, such that the object’s location at any future time t >

58

Vol 3, No.4, 2012

tupd can be calculated as oi.L(t) = oi.L(tupd) + oi.vel.(t - tupd). Using such modeling, an object needs to issue an
update to the database only if the parameters of its motion function (e.g., oi.vel for linear movement)
change.

Since the spatial database can be regarded as a special type of STDB where all the objects have zero
velocities, all the spatial query types naturally find their counterparts in STDB, except that they are
augmented with additional temporal predicates. Specifically, a window query (WQ) specifies a query region
qR and time interval qT (consisting of continuous timestamps), and finds all the objects whose extents (or
locations for point data) intersect qR during qT. Particularly, the selectivity of a WQ equals the number of
retrieved objects divided by the dataset cardinality, and its accurate estimation [6, 7] is imperative to query
optimization. A k nearest neighbor (kNN) query specifies a query point qP and time interval qT , and finds
the k objects whose distances to qP during qT are the smallest. These problems become even more complex
if query regions/points (in WQ/kNN) are also moving. While the above queries involve only one dataset,
the within-distance join (WDJ), given two datasets S1, S2 reports all the object pairs (o1, o2) in the cartesian
product S1×S2, such that the distance between o1, o2 during a query time interval qT is smaller than certain
threshold d. The selectivity of a join is the number of retrieved pairs divided by the size of S1×S2. Similarly,
the k closest pair (kCP) query retrieves the k object pairs (o1, o2) such that the distance of o1,o2 during qT is
the smallest, among all the pairs in S1×S2. Note that the above queries can be defined in both historical and
predictive STDB.
In addition to queries inherited from conventional spatial databases, the dynamic nature of STDB also leads
to several novel query types. For historical databases, the navigational WQ has been introduced which
specifies two query regions qR1, qR2 and timestamps qT1, qT2 and retrieves all the objects that intersect qR1 at
qT1, and also intersect qR2 at qT2 (e.g., find all the vehicles that appeared in Harvard at 5pm yesterday and
then appeared in MIT 10 minutes later). In predictive STDB, [8] points out that the results of traditional
queries (i.e., WQ, kNN, WDJ, kCP) are usually inadequate because they may change (sometimes almost
immediately) due to the movements of objects and/or queries (e.g., a user’s nearest gas station may change
as s/he drives on the highway).
Motivated by this, [8] proposes the time-parameterized (TP) query, which applies to any traditional query,
and returns, in additional to the result R, also (i) an expiry time T of R, and (ii) the change C of the result
after T. An example of TPNN is to report (i) the nearest station s, (ii) when s will cease to be the nearest
(given the user’s moving direction and speed), and (iii) the new nearest station after the expiry of s. The
concept of TP is extended to the continuous query in [9], which is another general concept applicable to all
traditional queries and aims at continuously tracking the result changes until certain conditions are satisfied.
A continuous WQ, for instance, may “return the aircrafts within 10 miles from flight UA183 now and
continuously update this information until its arrival”. In TP and continuous processing, the moving
direction of the query can be clearly specified, which is not true in some applications (e.g., a tourist
wandering around casually). The concept useful in such scenarios is the location-based (LB) query [10],
which applies to WQ and kNN and finds the query result as well as its validity region such that, as long as
the query is in this region, its result will remain the same. For example, a LB NN may return the nearest
restaurant of a tourist, as well as a validity region in which the restaurant will remain the nearest.
Numerous access methods have been proposed for efficient spatio-temporal query processing. A
straightforward approach to index historical STDB is to create a spatial index (the most common ones
include the R-tree) at each timestamp in history, managing objects’ extents at that timestamp. This is the
idea behind the so-called partially persistent structures which in order to reduce the space consumption
allows the R-trees at consecutive timestamps to share common nodes if the objects in these nodes do not
incur extent changes. The first partially persistent structure, the historical R-tree (HR-tree), however, still
involves considerable data redundancy, which led to the development of the multi-version R-tree (MVR-
tree) and its subsequent versions. Besides the partially persistent methodology, historical STDB can also be
indexed using a 3D R-tree by treating time just as an extra dimension (in addition to the two spatial
dimensions). Specifically, each record in the 3D R-tree represents a 3D box, whose spatial projection

59

Vol 3, No.4, 2012

corresponds to the extent of a stationary object, and whose temporal projection denotes the time interval
during which the object is stationary. Similar ideas are used in the trajectory bundle tree (TB-tree), a
structure optimized for navigational WQ queries. In practical STDB, it adapts the Quadtree (a spatial index)
for indexing the movements of 1D object, while the time-parameterized R-tree (TPR-tree) and its improved
versions support objects of arbitrary dimensionality. Finally, indexing moving objects has also been studied
in theory [11] which develops numerous interesting structures with provable worst-case performance
bounds. These bounds, however, usually involve large hidden constants, rendering these “theoretical”
solutions to be outperformed by the “practical” solutions introduced earlier.
Due to the time component, spatiotemporal databases need to manage large amounts of data accumulated
over long period of time. A user asks queries over this data and the straightforward solution to find the
answer is to read all objects in the database and return the objects that belong to the answer. However this
approach is inefficient due to the size of the database. A better solution is to construct indexes over the data
and answer a query by reading only a small part of the database. In general, an index is a way to organize a
dataset in disk pages in order to answer efficiently a specific type of queries, by reading only a small
number of disk pages [12-14].

6. Conclusion
Spatio-temporal data mining is becoming now very important field of research as it focuses the data for not
only static view point but also on time and space. Thus it is useful to locate future statistics based on time
and space but querying, indexing and many other relevant issues of spatio-temporal data are not easy till
days. Spatiotemporal data support is considered to be an important research direction, since many
applications need to manipulate data that change over time. STDBMS, in particular, should (i) offer
appropriate data types and query languages for time-evolving spatial objects, (ii) provide efficient indexing
techniques and access methods for spatiotemporal query processing and (iii) exploit cost models for query
optimization purposes. So the research on spatio-temporal data mining is still going on.

References
Geetha, R., Sumathi, N. & Sathiabama, D. S. (2008), “A Survey of Spatial, Temporal and Spatio-Temporal
Data Mining”, Journal of Computer Applications 1(4), 31-33.
Roddick, J. F., Egenhofer, M., J., Hoel, E., Papadias, D. & Salberg, B. (2004), “Spatial, Temporal and
Spatio-Temporal Databases – Hot Issues and Direction for PhD Research”, ACM SIGMOD Record, 33(2),
126-131.
Hadzilacos, T., Manolopoulos, Y., Roddick, J. F. & Theodoridis, Y. (2003), “Advances in Spatial and
Temporal Databases”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2750, 306-324.
Forlizzi, L., Guting, R., Nardelli, R. & Schneider, M. (2000), “A Data Model and Data Structures for
Moving Objects Databases”, ACM SIGMOD Record 29(2), 319-330.
Gutting, R., Bohlen, M., Erwig, M., Jensen, C., Lorentzos, N., Schneider, M. & Vazirgiannis, M. (2000), “A
Foundation for Representing and Querying Moving Objects”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems
(TODS) 25(1), 1–42.
Choi, Y. & Chung, C. (2002), “Selectivity Estimation for Spatio-Temporal Queries to Moving Objects”,
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 440-451.
Hadjieleftheriou, M., Kollios, G. & Tsotras, V. (2003), “Performance Evaluation of Spatio-Temporal
Selectivity Techniques”, 15th International Conference on Science and Statistical Database Management,
202-211.
Tao, Y., Sun, J. & Papadias, D. (2003), “Selectivity Estimation for Predictive Spatio-Temporal Queries”,
19th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’03), 417-428.

60

Vol 3, No.4, 2012

Tao, Y., Mamoulis, N. & Papadias, D. (2003), “Validity Information Retrieval for Spatio-Temporal
Queries”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2750, 159-178.
Papadias, D., Kalnis, P., Zhang, J. & Tao, Y. (2001), “Efficient OLAP Operations in Spatial Data
Warehouses”, Proceedings of Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases (SSTD), 443-459.

Tao, Y. & Papadias, D. (2002), “Time-Parameterized Queries in Spatio-Temporal Databases”, Proceedings
of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 334-345.
Hadjieleftheriou, M., Kollios, G., Tsotras, V. & Gunopulos, D. (2002), “Efficient Indexing of
Spatiotemporal Objects”, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Extending Database
Technology: Advances in Database Technology (EDBT), 251-268.
Kollios, G., Gunopulos, D., Tsotras, V., Delis, A. & Hadjieleftheriou, M. (2001), “Indexing Animated
Objects using Spatiotemporal Access Methods”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
13(5), 758-777.
Saltenis, S., Jensen, C., Leutenegger, S. & Lopez, M. (2000), “Indexing the Positions of Continuously
Moving Objects”, ACM SIGMOD Record 29(2), 331-342.

A.N.M. Bazlur Rashid born in 1984 at Rangpur, Bangladesh. He received his B.Sc. Engg. degree in
Computer Science and Engineering from Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Rajshahi,
Bangladesh in 2005 and M.Sc. Engg. degree in Information and Communication Technology from
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh in 2010. He has several years
of professional experience in the field of database having Oracle professional certification in database
administration. Currently, he has been serving as a Lecturer in the Department of Computer Science and
Engineering of Comilla University, Comilla, Bangladesh. His major field of study includes query
processing, query optimization, materialized view, database and information system, data warehousing and
data mining. E-mail: bazlur.rashid@yahoo.com

Md. Anwar Hossain was born in 26th November 1983 in the district of Pabna, Bangladesh. He has got his
B.Sc (Honours) and M.Sc degree in Information and Communication Engineering from the University of
Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh in 2007 and 2009 respectively. He has several years of experience in the
field of programming and IT sector. Currently, he has been working as a Lecturer in the department of
Information and Communication Engineering at Pabna Science and Technology University, Pabna,
Bangladesh. His major field of study is radio resource management for wireless networks, network coding
and game theory in wireless communication, cognitive radio networks, wireless sensor network, mobile ad
hoc network. E-mail: manwar_ice@yahoo.com

61

Vol 3, No.4, 2012

Appendix

Figure 1. Integrated Data Mining Architecture

Figure 2. Spatial and Non-Spatial Attributes of Communities
Table 1. Employees record with valid start and end time
EmpID Name Department Salary ValidTimeStart ValidTimeEnd
10 John Research 11000 1985 1990
10 John Sales 11000 1990 1993
10 John Sales 12000 1993 INF
11 Paul Research 10000 1988 1995
12 George Research 10500 1991 INF
13 Ringo Sales 15500 1988 INF

62

Vol 3, No.4, 2012

Figure 3. Snapshot Database in the Context of Valid Time and Transaction Time

Figure 4. The States Stored in a Bitemporal Database

63

International Journals Call for Paper
The IISTE, a U.S. publisher, is currently hosting the academic journals listed below. The peer review process of the following journals
usually takes LESS THAN 14 business days and IISTE usually publishes a qualified article within 30 days. Authors should
send their full paper to the following email address. More information can be found in the IISTE website : www.iiste.org

Business, Economics, Finance and Management PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
European Journal of Business and Management EJBM@iiste.org
Research Journal of Finance and Accounting RJFA@iiste.org
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development JESD@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management IKM@iiste.org
Developing Country Studies DCS@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters IEL@iiste.org

Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Chemistry PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Natural Sciences Research JNSR@iiste.org
Chemistry and Materials Research CMR@iiste.org
Mathematical Theory and Modeling MTM@iiste.org
Advances in Physics Theories and Applications APTA@iiste.org
Chemical and Process Engineering Research CPER@iiste.org

Engineering, Technology and Systems PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems CEIS@iiste.org
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering ISDE@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy JETP@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management IKM@iiste.org
Control Theory and Informatics CTI@iiste.org
Journal of Information Engineering and Applications JIEA@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters IEL@iiste.org
Network and Complex Systems NCS@iiste.org

Environment, Civil, Materials Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Environment and Earth Science JEES@iiste.org
Civil and Environmental Research CER@iiste.org
Civil and Environmental Research CER@iiste.org

Life Science, Food and Medical Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare JBAH@iiste.org
Food Science and Quality Management FSQM@iiste.org
Chemistry and Materials Research CMR@iiste.org

Education, and other Social Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Education and Practice JEP@iiste.org
Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization JLPG@iiste.org Global knowledge sharing:
New Media and Mass Communication NMMC@iiste.org EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy JETP@iiste.org Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP
Historical Research Letter HRL@iiste.org Open Archives Harvester, Bielefeld
Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Public Policy and Administration Research PPAR@iiste.org Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate,
International Affairs and Global Strategy IAGS@iiste.org OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library ,
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences RHSS@iiste.org NewJour, Google Scholar.

Developing Country Studies DCS@iiste.org IISTE is member of CrossRef. All journals
Arts and Design Studies ADS@iiste.org have high IC Impact Factor Values (ICV).

11.challenging issues of spatio temporal data mining

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to 11.challenging issues of spatio temporal data mining (20)

More from Alexander Decker (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

11.challenging issues of spatio temporal data mining