IRD Balancing Technical Paper 1 
World’s Leading Supplier of Soft Bearing 
Balancing Machines & Instruments 
Balance Quality Requirements 
of Rigid Rotors 
The Practical Application of ISO 1940/1
Balance Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors 
The Practical Application of ISO 1940/1 
ABSTRACT 
International Standard ISO 1940/1 is a widely-accepted 
reference for selecting rigid rotor 
balance quality. This paper is presented as a 
tutorial and user's reference of the standard and 
its practical applications. 
A simplified method is shown for determining 
permissible residual unbalance for various rotor 
classifications. Emphasis is given to allocating 
permissible residual unbalance to appropriate 
correction planes for rotor configurations, such 
as unsymmetrical, narrow and overhung rotors. 
Finally, a comparison of various balance quality 
grades is made with MIL-STD-167-1 and API 
balance limits. 
INTRODUCTION 
The International Standards Organization, ISO, 
published Standard 1940/1 "Balance Quality 
Requirements of Rigid Rotors," which has been 
adopted by the American National Standards 
Institute, ANSI, as S2.19-1975, "Balance Quality 
Requirements of Rotating Rigid Bodies." It has 
also been adopted by BRITISH Standards as BS 
6861: Part 1 and by GERMAN Standards as VDI 
2060. 
ISO 1940/1 requires an understanding of 
balancing and its terminology if the standard is 
to be understood and used properly. The 
reader is directed to the paper's "Balance 
Terminology" section for a summary of terms 
used in this paper. 
USING THE STANDARD 
The use of the standard involves the following 
steps: 
1. Select a balance quality grade "G number" 
from Table 1 based on rotor type. 
2. Use the Figure 1 (A or B) graph to determine 
the permissible residual specific unbalance 
value, eper for the rotor's maximum operating 
speed and the selected "G number." Then 
multiply eper by rotor weight to obtain the 
permissible residual unbalance, Uper. 
3. Allocate Uper to the balancing correction 
planes based on rotor configuration. 
Performing step 1 simply requires the user to 
find the rotor type that most nearly describes 
the one to be balanced. 
Step 2 is more involved as it requires using the 
graph in Figure 1 to find the permissible specific 
unbalance, followed by multiplying by rotor 
weight and then a constant to convert Uper to 
proper units (gram-millimeters or ounce-inches). 
This step can be simplified by using some 
simple equations to calculate Uper directly. 
Step 3, allocating Uper, is often not performed 
because it is not easily understood. 
Therefore, the following pages provide a 
simplified method for step 2 and describe the 
procedures for step 3. 
1
Table 1 Balance quality grades for various groups of representative rigid rotors 
(From ISO 1940/1) 
2 
Balance 
Quality 
Grade 
Product of the 
Relationship 
(eper x v) (1) (2) 
mm/s 
Rotor Types - General Examples 
G 4 000 
G 1 600 
G 630 
G 250 
G 100 
G 40 
G 16 
G 6.3 
G 2.5 
G 1 
G 0.4 
4 000 
1 600 
630 
250 
100 
40 
16 
6.3 
2.5 
1 
0.4 
Crankshaft/drives(3) of rigidly mounted slow marine diesel engines with uneven number of cylinders(4) 
Crankshaft/drives of rigidly mounted large two-cycle engines 
Crankshaft/drives of rigidly mounted large four-cycle engines 
Crankshaft/drives of elastically mounted marine diesel engines 
Crankshaft/drives of rigidly mounted fast four-cylinder diesel engines(4) 
Crankshaft/drives of fast diesel engines with six or more cylinders(4) 
Complete engines (gasoline or diesel) for cars, trucks and locomotives(5) 
Car wheels, wheel rims, wheel sets, drive shafts 
Crankshaft/drives of elastically mounted fast four-cycle engines with six or more cylinders(4) 
Crankshaft/drives of engines of cars, trucks and locomotives 
Drive shafts (propeller shafts, cardan shafts) with special requirements 
Parts of crushing machines 
Parts of agricultural machinery 
Individual components of engines (gasoline or diesel) for cars, trucks and locomotives 
Crankshaft/drives of engines with six or more cylinders under special requirements 
Parts of process plant machines 
Marine main turbine gears (merchant service) 
Centrifuge drums 
Paper machinery rolls; print rolls 
Fans 
Assembled aircraft gas turbine rotors 
Flywheels 
Pump impellers 
Machine-tool and general machinery parts 
Medium and large electric armatures (of electric motors having at least 80 mm shaft height) without 
special requirements 
Small electric armatures, often mass produced, in vibration insensitive applications and/or with 
vibration-isolating mountings 
Individual components of engines under special requirements 
Gas and steam turbines, including marine main turbines (merchant service) 
Rigid turbo-generator rotors 
Computer memory drums and discs 
Turbo-compressors 
Machine-tool drives 
Medium and large electric armatures with special requirements 
Small electric armatures not qualifying for one or both of the conditions specified for small electric 
armatures of balance quality grade G 6.3 
Turbine-driven pumps 
Tape recorder and phonograph (gramophone) drives 
Grinding-machine drives 
Small electric armatures with special requirements 
Spindles, discs and armatures of precision grinders 
Gyroscopes 
1) v = 2¹n/60 Å n/10, if n is measured in revolutions per minute and v in radians per second. 
2) For allocating the permissible residual unbalance to correction planes, refer to "AIIocation of Uper to correction planes." 
3) A crankshaft/drive is an assembly which includes a crankshaft, flywheel, clutch, pulley, vibration damper, rotating portion of connecting rod, etc. 
4) For the purposes of this part of ISO 1940/1, slow diesel engines are those with a piston velocity of less than 9 m/s; fast diesel engines are those 
with a piston velocity of greater than 9 m/s. 
5) In complete engines, the rotor mass comprises the sum of all masses belonging to the crankshaft/drive described in note 3 above.
Figure 1-A Maximum permissible residual unbalance, eper 
(Imperial values adapted from ISO 1940/1) 
3 
PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL UNBALANCE eper in lb-in/lb of rotor weight 
or 
CENTER OF GRAVITY DISPLACEMENT, eper in inches 
MAXIMUM SERVICE SPEED IN RPM
Figure 1-B Maximum permissible residual unbalance, eper 
(From ISO 1940/1) 
4 
PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL UNBALANCE, eper in g-mm/kg of rotor weight 
OR 
CENTER OF GRAVITY DISPLACEMENT, eper in μm 
MAXIMUM SERVICE SPEED IN RPM
BALANCE QUALITY GRADES 
Table 1 shows the balance quality grades for a 
variety of rotor types. The "G" number is the 
product of specific unbalance and the angular 
velocity of the rotor at maximum operating speed 
and is a constant for rotors of the same type. 
G = e x v = constant 
This is based on the fact that geometrically similar 
rotors running at the same speed will have similar 
stresses in the rotor and its bearings. 
Balance quality grades are separated by a factor 
of 2.5. However, G numbers of intermediate value 
may be used to satisfy special requirements. For 
example, a standard pump impeller has a 
suggested balance quality grade of G 6.3. Special 
conditions may require a better balance quality of 
G 4.0 to satisfy installation in an area with low 
structure-borne noise limits. 
DETERMINING PERMISSIBLE 
RESIDUAL UNBALANCE - Uper 
Uper = eper x m 
(m = rotor mass) 
Permissible residual unbalance is a function of G 
number, rotor weight and maximum service speed 
of rotation. Instead of using the graph to look up 
the "specific unbalance" value for a given G 
number and service RPM and then multiplying by 
rotor weight (taking care to use proper units), Uper 
can be calculated by using one of the following 
formulae: 
Uper (oz-in) = 6.015 x G x W/N (W in Ib) 
Uper (g-in) = 170.5 x G x W/N (W in Ib) 
Uper (g-mm) = 9549 x G x W/N (W in kg) 
G = Balance quality grade from Table 1 
W = Rotor weight 
N = Maximum service RPM 
A slide rule that calculates Uper is also available 
from some balancing machine manufacturers. 
ALLOCATION OF Uper 
TO CORRECTION PLANES 
Uper is the total permissible residual unbalance 
and must be allocated to the balancing correction 
planes used based on rotor dimensions and 
configuration. 
For rotors balanced in a single correction plane, 
all of the Uper applies to that correction plane. 
For rotors balanced in two correction planes, Uper 
must be allocated to each correction plane based 
on rotor configuration and dimensions. 
SYMMETRICAL ROTORS 
Rules for symmetrical rotors. (See Figure 2.) 
1. Correction planes are between bearings. 
2. Distance "b" is greater than 1/3 "d." 
3. Correction planes are equidistant from the 
center of gravity. 
Uper left = Uper right = Uper/2 
When correction planes are NOT equidistant from 
the center of gravity, then - 
Uper left = Uper (hR/b) 
Uper right = Uper (hL/b) 
The Uper left or Uper right should not be less than 
30% or more than 70% Uper. If they are, then 
use rules for narrow rotors. 
5 
Figure 2 Symmetrical rotors
ROTORS WITH OUTBOARD 
CORRECTION PLANES 
Rules for rotors with correction planes outside the 
bearings. This is often referred to as a "dumb-bell" 
rotor configuration. (See Figure 3) 
Both correction planes are outboard of the 
bearings. 
b > d 
Adjust Uper by ratio of d/b. (Reduces Uper) 
Uper = Uper (d/b) Uper = Adjusted value 
When correction planes are not equidistant from 
the center of gravity, calculate Uper left and right 
as follows: 
Uper left = Uper (hR/b) Uper right = Uper (hL/b) 
OVERHUNG AND NARROW ROTORS 
Rules for overhung and narrow rotors. 
(See Figures 4 and 5). 
1. Distance between correction planes is less than 
1/3 the distance between bearings. b < 0.33 d. 
2. Assumes equal permissible dynamic bearing 
loads. 
3. Couple corrections are made 180° apart in their 
respective planes. 
4. The plane for static corrections may be a third 
plane or either of the planes used for couple 
corrections. 
5. Allocate Uper as static and couple residual 
unbalance as follows: 
Uper static = Uper/2 x d/2c 
Uper couple = Uper/2 x 3d/4b 
Permissible unbalance allocations for overhung 
and narrow rotors require that two plane 
unbalance corrections be divided into static and 
couple unbalance equivalents. This can be done 
graphically by plotting the two plane balance 
solution vectors UL and UR as shown in Figure 6. 
Connect vectors UL and UR as shown. The vector 
from the origin to the mid-point of vector CL-CR is 
one-half the rotor's static unbalance. Vectors CL 
and CR are the couple unbalance. 
6 
Figure 3 Rotor with outboard planes 
Figure 4 Overhung rotors 
Figure 5 Narrow rotors 
Figure 6 Static-couple graphical derivation
Figure 7 Comparision of API, ISO & MIL-STD-167-1 balance tolerances 
COMPARING API, ISO & MIL-STD-167-1 
BALANCE TOLERANCES 
Uper = Permissible residual unbalance FOR EACH CORRECTION PLANE in ounce inches. (oz-in) 
W = Rotor Weight In Pounds. W = 1000 lbs. for all examples shown. 
N = Maximum Continuous Operating RPM. 
G = ISO Balance Quality Grade Number, i.e. 6.3, 2.5, 1.0 etc. 
Fc < 10% Journal Static Load Uper = 56.347 x (Journal Static Load W/2) 
ISO Uper = G x 6.015 x W/2 
MIL-STD-167 ISO G 6.3 ISO G 2.5 ISO G 1.0 API FC = 10%W/2 
MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS OPERATING RPM 
7 
1 in = 25.4 mm 
1 mm = .0394 in 
1 lb = 454 g 
1 kg = 2.2 lb 
1 mil = 25.4 μm 
1 μm = .0394 mil 
1 oz = 28.35 g 
1 g = .0353 oz 
1 oz in = 720 g mm 
1 g mm = .00139 oz in 
Useful Conversions 
N2 
N 
MIL-STD-167-1 Uper = 0.177 W (0 to 150 RPM) 
= 4000 W / N2 (150 to 1000 RPM) 
= 4 W / N (Above 1000 RPM) 
W = Total Rotor Weight 
API Uper = 4 W / N (W = Journal static Load) 
Fc = 1.77 (RPM/1000)2 (oz-in) [Centrifugal Force] 
150 
500 
1000 
2000 
3000 
4000 
5000 
6000 
7000 
177 
16 
42 
1.33 
1.0 
.8 
.67 
.57 
777 
14 
21 
28 
35 
43 
49 
126.0 
38.0 
19.0 
9.5 
6.3 
4.7 
3.8 
3.2 
2.7 
5 
17 
34 
67 
100 
133 
168 
201 
234 
50.0 
15.0 
7.5 
3.8 
2.5 
1.9 
1.5 
1.3 
1.1 
2.0 
6.6 
13.3 
26.6 
39.8 
53.8 
66.4 
79.7 
92.8 
20.0 
6.0 
3.0 
1.5 
1.0 
.8 
.6 
.5 
.4 
0.8 
2.7 
5.3 
10.6 
15.9 
21.2 
26.6 
31.9 
37.3 
13.3 
4.0 
2.0 
1.0 
0.6 
0.5 
0.4 
0.3 
0.3 
0.5 
1.8 
3.5 
7.1 
9.6 
14.2 
17.7 
19.1 
26.0 
1252.0 
113.0 
28.0 
7.0 
3.1 
1.8 
1.1 
0.8 
0.6 
50 
50 
50 
50 
50 
50 
50 
50 
50 
N 
Uper 
oz-in 
Centr. 
Force 
Uper 
oz-in 
Centr. 
Force 
Uper 
oz-in 
Centr. 
Force 
Uper 
oz-in 
Centr. 
Force 
Uper 
oz-in 
Centr. 
Force 
Uper 
oz-in 
Centr. 
Force 
Copyright 1999 IRD Balancing 
DATA TABULATION
STANDARDS COMPARISON 
A frequent question is, "How do the ISO 1940/1 
quality grades compare with other balancing 
standards, such as API and MIL-STD-167-1?" 
A comparison graph and data tabulation appears 
in Figure 7. Three ISO grades (6.3, 2.5 and 1.0), 
MIL-STD-167-1 and API balance quality standards 
are compared in tabular and graphical form. 
In addition, Uper was calculated for a constant 
centrifugal force of 50 pounds (10% of static 
journal load). A symmetrical 1000 pound rotor 
with the C.G. midway between bearings and 
correction planes was used. Static load at each 
journal is 500 pounds and centrifugal force was 
calculated for each Uper. 
To more clearly show the relationship, a 
summary of balance quality standards and their 
corresponding centrifugal forces are shown in 
Table 2 as a percentage of journal static loading 
for 900, 1200, 1800 and 3600 RPM. 
Table 2 Centrifugal force as a percent 
of journal static load 
Uper = Permissible residual unbalance for each correction plane 
F = Centrifugal force due to residual unbalance 
L = Journal static load L = W/2 W = 1000 lbs. 
From the graph and Table 2, it is easy to see 
that the API standard demands a low residual 
unbalance level and with a smaller unbalance 
force load on the rotor's bearings. However, 
the effort to achieve this result may not always 
be cost effective. 
Published balance tolerances provide everyone 
with a common reference for communicating 
balance quality expectations, as well as what 
the provider promises. Proper interpretation 
and application of each is needed to realize 
satisfaction for everyone. 
BALANCE TERMINOLOGY 
BALANCE QUALITY GRADE - GXXX - for rigid 
rotors, G, is the product of specific unbalance, e, 
and rotor maximum service angular velocity. 
Service angular velocity is service RPM expressed 
in radians per second. 
G = e x v = constant 
CENTER OF GRAVITY - the point in a body through 
which the resultant of the weights of its 
component particles passes for all orientations of 
the body with respect to a gravitational field C.G. 
CORRECTION (BALANCING) PLANE - plane 
perpendicular to the shaft axis of a rotor in which 
correction for unbalance is made. 
COUPLE UNBALANCE - that condition of 
unbalance for which the central principal axis 
intersects the shaft axis at the center of gravity. 
CRITICAL SPEED - speed at which a system 
resonance is excited. The resonance may be of 
the journal supports (rigid mode) or flexure of the 
rotor (flexural mode). 
DYNAMIC UNBALANCE - that condition of 
unbalance for which the central principal axis is not 
parallel to and does not intersect the shaft axis. 
8 
Balance 
Quality 
Std. 
900 RPM 1200 RPM 1800 RPM 3600 RPM 
Uper 
oz-in 
Uper 
oz-in 
Uper 
oz-in 
Uper 
oz-in 
F/L % F/L % F/L % F/L % 
ISO G6.3 
ISO G2.5 
MIL-STD 
ISO G1.0 
API 
21 
8.3 
4.4 
3.3 
2.2 
6.0% 
2.4% 
1.3% 
0.9% 
0.6% 
15.8 
6.3 
3.3 
2.5 
1.7 
8.1% 
3.2% 
1.7% 
1.3% 
0.8% 
10.5 
4.2 
2.2 
1.7 
1.1 
12.0% 
4.8% 
2.5% 
1.90% 
1.3% 
5.3 
2.1 
1.1 
0.8 
0.6 
24.1% 
9.6% 
5.1% 
3.7% 
2.6%
Note: Dynamic unbalance is equivalent to two 
unbalance vectors in two specified planes which 
completely represent the total unbalance of the 
rotor. 
Note: Dynamic unbalance may also be resolved 
into static and couple unbalance vectors whose 
vector sum is also equal to the total unbalance of 
the rotor. 
FLEXIBLE ROTOR - a rotor that does not satisfy the 
rigid rotor definition because of elastic deflection. 
PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL UNBALANCE Uper - the 
maximum residual unbalance permitted for a 
rotor or in a correction plane. 
Uper = eper x m 
where m = rotor mass 
PRINCIPAL INERTIA AXIS - the coordinate 
directions corresponding to the principal moments 
of inertia. In balancing, the term principal inertia 
axis is used to designate the central principal axis 
most nearly coincident with the shaft axis of the 
rotor. 
RESIDUAL (FINAL) UNBALANCE - the unbalance 
of any kind that remains after balancing. 
RIGID ROTOR - a rotor is considered rigid if its 
unbalance can be corrected in any two correction 
planes. After the correction, the residual 
unbalance does not change significantly at any 
speed up to the maximum service speed. 
ROTOR - a body capable of rotation which 
generally has journals supported by bearings. 
STATIC UNBALANCE - that condition of unbalance 
for which the central principal axis is displaced 
only parallel to the shaft axis. 
SPECIFIC UNBALANCE - static unbalance U 
divided by rotor mass m (i.e., mass eccentricity). 
Note: In the case of a rotor with two correction 
planes, specific unbalance may refer to the 
unbalance in one plane divided by rotor mass 
allocated to that plane. 
REFERENCES 
1. ISO 1940/1, "Balance Quality Requirements of 
Rigid Rotors." International Organization for 
Standardization. 
2. ANSI S2. 19-1975, "Balance Quality 
Requirements of Rotating Rigid Bodies." 
American National Standards Institute. 
3. BS 6861: Part 1, "Balance Quality Requirements 
of Rigid Rotors." British Standards Institution. 
4. VDI 2060, "Balance Quality Requirements of 
Rigid Rotors." German Standards Institution. 
5. Standard Paragraphs, API Subcommittee on 
Mechanical Equipment, Revision 19, September 
1991. American Petroleum Institute. 
6. MIL-STD-167-1 (SHIPS), 1 May 1974, 
"Mechanical Vibrations of Shipboard 
Equipment." Department of the Navy, 
Naval Ship Systems Command. 
7. "DYNAMIC BALANCING HANDBOOK," 
October 1990, IRD Mechanalysis Inc. 
8. ISO 1925, “Balancing Vocabulary.” 
International Organization for Standardization. 
9
USA: Louisville,KY 
1.888.473.2251 phone 
1.502.238.1001 fax 
UK: Chester 
44.1244.538170 phone 
44.1244.528900 fax 
USA Headquarters 
www.irdbalancing.com 
sales@irdbalancing.com 
MEXICO: Mexico City 
52.55.5689.8325 phone 
52.55.5689.8160 fax 
CANADA: Quebec 
1.450.724.4066 phone 
1.450.724.4077 fax 
IRD P/N E51267 Rev 2: Mar 2009

More Related Content

PPTX
Automotive seat design
PDF
Westermann tables
PDF
Seat design
PPT
Composite automobile leaf spring-Fatigue life
PPTX
Tips and Tricks for a Great Dev Platform
PPTX
SAE Baja Ergonomic Evaluation
PDF
Human Factors & Ergonomics in Automobile Enineering
PPTX
Approach to paralytic hand IOM Peripheral Nerve
Automotive seat design
Westermann tables
Seat design
Composite automobile leaf spring-Fatigue life
Tips and Tricks for a Great Dev Platform
SAE Baja Ergonomic Evaluation
Human Factors & Ergonomics in Automobile Enineering
Approach to paralytic hand IOM Peripheral Nerve

Similar to Tech paper1balqualityreqmts (20)

PDF
Balance quality requirements_of_rigid_rotors
PPTX
Balancing requirement according to iso 1940
PPT
Balancing presentation
PDF
Balancing of unbalanced rotors2
PDF
Beebe - Balancing by timed oscillation (AUS)
PDF
highspeedbalancingofrotors-181004093658-2.PDF
PDF
High speed balancing of turbine rotors
PDF
High-speed balancing, Sulzer Technical Review, 2009
PPT
Balancing training module for rotary equipment.ppt
PPTX
Balancing of Rotating masses
PPTX
Machine balancing presentation
PDF
jurnal (inggris)
PDF
1.3428190.pdf
PDF
Dynamics of machinery(mgu)
PDF
10.5923.j.safety.20120104.01
PDF
IRJET- Design & Fabrication of Static and Dynamic Vibration Balancing Machine
PDF
New approach for computer-aided static balancing of turbines rotors
PDF
NEW APPROACH FOR COMPUTER-AIDED STATIC BALANCING OF TURBINES ROTORS
PDF
PPTX
chapter 11_100355.pptx
Balance quality requirements_of_rigid_rotors
Balancing requirement according to iso 1940
Balancing presentation
Balancing of unbalanced rotors2
Beebe - Balancing by timed oscillation (AUS)
highspeedbalancingofrotors-181004093658-2.PDF
High speed balancing of turbine rotors
High-speed balancing, Sulzer Technical Review, 2009
Balancing training module for rotary equipment.ppt
Balancing of Rotating masses
Machine balancing presentation
jurnal (inggris)
1.3428190.pdf
Dynamics of machinery(mgu)
10.5923.j.safety.20120104.01
IRJET- Design & Fabrication of Static and Dynamic Vibration Balancing Machine
New approach for computer-aided static balancing of turbines rotors
NEW APPROACH FOR COMPUTER-AIDED STATIC BALANCING OF TURBINES ROTORS
chapter 11_100355.pptx
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
MLpara ingenieira CIVIL, meca Y AMBIENTAL
PDF
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
PPTX
AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE MANAGEMENT (MECHATRONICS).pptx
PPT
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Manufacturing Technology_2.ppt
PDF
First part_B-Image Processing - 1 of 2).pdf
PPTX
Amdahl’s law is explained in the above power point presentations
PDF
Computer organization and architecuture Digital Notes....pdf
PPTX
Module 8- Technological and Communication Skills.pptx
PDF
Accra-Kumasi Expressway - Prefeasibility Report Volume 1 of 7.11.2018.pdf
PDF
August -2025_Top10 Read_Articles_ijait.pdf
PDF
UEFA_Carbon_Footprint_Calculator_Methology_2.0.pdf
PDF
Implantable Drug Delivery System_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI .pdf
PPTX
ASME PCC-02 TRAINING -DESKTOP-NLE5HNP.pptx
PDF
20250617 - IR - Global Guide for HR - 51 pages.pdf
PPTX
ai_satellite_crop_management_20250815030350.pptx
PDF
Unit1 - AIML Chapter 1 concept and ethics
PDF
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
PPTX
Graph Data Structures with Types, Traversals, Connectivity, and Real-Life App...
PDF
UEFA_Embodied_Carbon_Emissions_Football_Infrastructure.pdf
PPTX
CN_Unite_1 AI&DS ENGGERING SPPU PUNE UNIVERSITY
MLpara ingenieira CIVIL, meca Y AMBIENTAL
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE MANAGEMENT (MECHATRONICS).pptx
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Manufacturing Technology_2.ppt
First part_B-Image Processing - 1 of 2).pdf
Amdahl’s law is explained in the above power point presentations
Computer organization and architecuture Digital Notes....pdf
Module 8- Technological and Communication Skills.pptx
Accra-Kumasi Expressway - Prefeasibility Report Volume 1 of 7.11.2018.pdf
August -2025_Top10 Read_Articles_ijait.pdf
UEFA_Carbon_Footprint_Calculator_Methology_2.0.pdf
Implantable Drug Delivery System_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI .pdf
ASME PCC-02 TRAINING -DESKTOP-NLE5HNP.pptx
20250617 - IR - Global Guide for HR - 51 pages.pdf
ai_satellite_crop_management_20250815030350.pptx
Unit1 - AIML Chapter 1 concept and ethics
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
Graph Data Structures with Types, Traversals, Connectivity, and Real-Life App...
UEFA_Embodied_Carbon_Emissions_Football_Infrastructure.pdf
CN_Unite_1 AI&DS ENGGERING SPPU PUNE UNIVERSITY
Ad

Tech paper1balqualityreqmts

  • 1. IRD Balancing Technical Paper 1 World’s Leading Supplier of Soft Bearing Balancing Machines & Instruments Balance Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors The Practical Application of ISO 1940/1
  • 2. Balance Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors The Practical Application of ISO 1940/1 ABSTRACT International Standard ISO 1940/1 is a widely-accepted reference for selecting rigid rotor balance quality. This paper is presented as a tutorial and user's reference of the standard and its practical applications. A simplified method is shown for determining permissible residual unbalance for various rotor classifications. Emphasis is given to allocating permissible residual unbalance to appropriate correction planes for rotor configurations, such as unsymmetrical, narrow and overhung rotors. Finally, a comparison of various balance quality grades is made with MIL-STD-167-1 and API balance limits. INTRODUCTION The International Standards Organization, ISO, published Standard 1940/1 "Balance Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors," which has been adopted by the American National Standards Institute, ANSI, as S2.19-1975, "Balance Quality Requirements of Rotating Rigid Bodies." It has also been adopted by BRITISH Standards as BS 6861: Part 1 and by GERMAN Standards as VDI 2060. ISO 1940/1 requires an understanding of balancing and its terminology if the standard is to be understood and used properly. The reader is directed to the paper's "Balance Terminology" section for a summary of terms used in this paper. USING THE STANDARD The use of the standard involves the following steps: 1. Select a balance quality grade "G number" from Table 1 based on rotor type. 2. Use the Figure 1 (A or B) graph to determine the permissible residual specific unbalance value, eper for the rotor's maximum operating speed and the selected "G number." Then multiply eper by rotor weight to obtain the permissible residual unbalance, Uper. 3. Allocate Uper to the balancing correction planes based on rotor configuration. Performing step 1 simply requires the user to find the rotor type that most nearly describes the one to be balanced. Step 2 is more involved as it requires using the graph in Figure 1 to find the permissible specific unbalance, followed by multiplying by rotor weight and then a constant to convert Uper to proper units (gram-millimeters or ounce-inches). This step can be simplified by using some simple equations to calculate Uper directly. Step 3, allocating Uper, is often not performed because it is not easily understood. Therefore, the following pages provide a simplified method for step 2 and describe the procedures for step 3. 1
  • 3. Table 1 Balance quality grades for various groups of representative rigid rotors (From ISO 1940/1) 2 Balance Quality Grade Product of the Relationship (eper x v) (1) (2) mm/s Rotor Types - General Examples G 4 000 G 1 600 G 630 G 250 G 100 G 40 G 16 G 6.3 G 2.5 G 1 G 0.4 4 000 1 600 630 250 100 40 16 6.3 2.5 1 0.4 Crankshaft/drives(3) of rigidly mounted slow marine diesel engines with uneven number of cylinders(4) Crankshaft/drives of rigidly mounted large two-cycle engines Crankshaft/drives of rigidly mounted large four-cycle engines Crankshaft/drives of elastically mounted marine diesel engines Crankshaft/drives of rigidly mounted fast four-cylinder diesel engines(4) Crankshaft/drives of fast diesel engines with six or more cylinders(4) Complete engines (gasoline or diesel) for cars, trucks and locomotives(5) Car wheels, wheel rims, wheel sets, drive shafts Crankshaft/drives of elastically mounted fast four-cycle engines with six or more cylinders(4) Crankshaft/drives of engines of cars, trucks and locomotives Drive shafts (propeller shafts, cardan shafts) with special requirements Parts of crushing machines Parts of agricultural machinery Individual components of engines (gasoline or diesel) for cars, trucks and locomotives Crankshaft/drives of engines with six or more cylinders under special requirements Parts of process plant machines Marine main turbine gears (merchant service) Centrifuge drums Paper machinery rolls; print rolls Fans Assembled aircraft gas turbine rotors Flywheels Pump impellers Machine-tool and general machinery parts Medium and large electric armatures (of electric motors having at least 80 mm shaft height) without special requirements Small electric armatures, often mass produced, in vibration insensitive applications and/or with vibration-isolating mountings Individual components of engines under special requirements Gas and steam turbines, including marine main turbines (merchant service) Rigid turbo-generator rotors Computer memory drums and discs Turbo-compressors Machine-tool drives Medium and large electric armatures with special requirements Small electric armatures not qualifying for one or both of the conditions specified for small electric armatures of balance quality grade G 6.3 Turbine-driven pumps Tape recorder and phonograph (gramophone) drives Grinding-machine drives Small electric armatures with special requirements Spindles, discs and armatures of precision grinders Gyroscopes 1) v = 2¹n/60 Å n/10, if n is measured in revolutions per minute and v in radians per second. 2) For allocating the permissible residual unbalance to correction planes, refer to "AIIocation of Uper to correction planes." 3) A crankshaft/drive is an assembly which includes a crankshaft, flywheel, clutch, pulley, vibration damper, rotating portion of connecting rod, etc. 4) For the purposes of this part of ISO 1940/1, slow diesel engines are those with a piston velocity of less than 9 m/s; fast diesel engines are those with a piston velocity of greater than 9 m/s. 5) In complete engines, the rotor mass comprises the sum of all masses belonging to the crankshaft/drive described in note 3 above.
  • 4. Figure 1-A Maximum permissible residual unbalance, eper (Imperial values adapted from ISO 1940/1) 3 PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL UNBALANCE eper in lb-in/lb of rotor weight or CENTER OF GRAVITY DISPLACEMENT, eper in inches MAXIMUM SERVICE SPEED IN RPM
  • 5. Figure 1-B Maximum permissible residual unbalance, eper (From ISO 1940/1) 4 PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL UNBALANCE, eper in g-mm/kg of rotor weight OR CENTER OF GRAVITY DISPLACEMENT, eper in μm MAXIMUM SERVICE SPEED IN RPM
  • 6. BALANCE QUALITY GRADES Table 1 shows the balance quality grades for a variety of rotor types. The "G" number is the product of specific unbalance and the angular velocity of the rotor at maximum operating speed and is a constant for rotors of the same type. G = e x v = constant This is based on the fact that geometrically similar rotors running at the same speed will have similar stresses in the rotor and its bearings. Balance quality grades are separated by a factor of 2.5. However, G numbers of intermediate value may be used to satisfy special requirements. For example, a standard pump impeller has a suggested balance quality grade of G 6.3. Special conditions may require a better balance quality of G 4.0 to satisfy installation in an area with low structure-borne noise limits. DETERMINING PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL UNBALANCE - Uper Uper = eper x m (m = rotor mass) Permissible residual unbalance is a function of G number, rotor weight and maximum service speed of rotation. Instead of using the graph to look up the "specific unbalance" value for a given G number and service RPM and then multiplying by rotor weight (taking care to use proper units), Uper can be calculated by using one of the following formulae: Uper (oz-in) = 6.015 x G x W/N (W in Ib) Uper (g-in) = 170.5 x G x W/N (W in Ib) Uper (g-mm) = 9549 x G x W/N (W in kg) G = Balance quality grade from Table 1 W = Rotor weight N = Maximum service RPM A slide rule that calculates Uper is also available from some balancing machine manufacturers. ALLOCATION OF Uper TO CORRECTION PLANES Uper is the total permissible residual unbalance and must be allocated to the balancing correction planes used based on rotor dimensions and configuration. For rotors balanced in a single correction plane, all of the Uper applies to that correction plane. For rotors balanced in two correction planes, Uper must be allocated to each correction plane based on rotor configuration and dimensions. SYMMETRICAL ROTORS Rules for symmetrical rotors. (See Figure 2.) 1. Correction planes are between bearings. 2. Distance "b" is greater than 1/3 "d." 3. Correction planes are equidistant from the center of gravity. Uper left = Uper right = Uper/2 When correction planes are NOT equidistant from the center of gravity, then - Uper left = Uper (hR/b) Uper right = Uper (hL/b) The Uper left or Uper right should not be less than 30% or more than 70% Uper. If they are, then use rules for narrow rotors. 5 Figure 2 Symmetrical rotors
  • 7. ROTORS WITH OUTBOARD CORRECTION PLANES Rules for rotors with correction planes outside the bearings. This is often referred to as a "dumb-bell" rotor configuration. (See Figure 3) Both correction planes are outboard of the bearings. b > d Adjust Uper by ratio of d/b. (Reduces Uper) Uper = Uper (d/b) Uper = Adjusted value When correction planes are not equidistant from the center of gravity, calculate Uper left and right as follows: Uper left = Uper (hR/b) Uper right = Uper (hL/b) OVERHUNG AND NARROW ROTORS Rules for overhung and narrow rotors. (See Figures 4 and 5). 1. Distance between correction planes is less than 1/3 the distance between bearings. b < 0.33 d. 2. Assumes equal permissible dynamic bearing loads. 3. Couple corrections are made 180° apart in their respective planes. 4. The plane for static corrections may be a third plane or either of the planes used for couple corrections. 5. Allocate Uper as static and couple residual unbalance as follows: Uper static = Uper/2 x d/2c Uper couple = Uper/2 x 3d/4b Permissible unbalance allocations for overhung and narrow rotors require that two plane unbalance corrections be divided into static and couple unbalance equivalents. This can be done graphically by plotting the two plane balance solution vectors UL and UR as shown in Figure 6. Connect vectors UL and UR as shown. The vector from the origin to the mid-point of vector CL-CR is one-half the rotor's static unbalance. Vectors CL and CR are the couple unbalance. 6 Figure 3 Rotor with outboard planes Figure 4 Overhung rotors Figure 5 Narrow rotors Figure 6 Static-couple graphical derivation
  • 8. Figure 7 Comparision of API, ISO & MIL-STD-167-1 balance tolerances COMPARING API, ISO & MIL-STD-167-1 BALANCE TOLERANCES Uper = Permissible residual unbalance FOR EACH CORRECTION PLANE in ounce inches. (oz-in) W = Rotor Weight In Pounds. W = 1000 lbs. for all examples shown. N = Maximum Continuous Operating RPM. G = ISO Balance Quality Grade Number, i.e. 6.3, 2.5, 1.0 etc. Fc < 10% Journal Static Load Uper = 56.347 x (Journal Static Load W/2) ISO Uper = G x 6.015 x W/2 MIL-STD-167 ISO G 6.3 ISO G 2.5 ISO G 1.0 API FC = 10%W/2 MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS OPERATING RPM 7 1 in = 25.4 mm 1 mm = .0394 in 1 lb = 454 g 1 kg = 2.2 lb 1 mil = 25.4 μm 1 μm = .0394 mil 1 oz = 28.35 g 1 g = .0353 oz 1 oz in = 720 g mm 1 g mm = .00139 oz in Useful Conversions N2 N MIL-STD-167-1 Uper = 0.177 W (0 to 150 RPM) = 4000 W / N2 (150 to 1000 RPM) = 4 W / N (Above 1000 RPM) W = Total Rotor Weight API Uper = 4 W / N (W = Journal static Load) Fc = 1.77 (RPM/1000)2 (oz-in) [Centrifugal Force] 150 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 177 16 42 1.33 1.0 .8 .67 .57 777 14 21 28 35 43 49 126.0 38.0 19.0 9.5 6.3 4.7 3.8 3.2 2.7 5 17 34 67 100 133 168 201 234 50.0 15.0 7.5 3.8 2.5 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.1 2.0 6.6 13.3 26.6 39.8 53.8 66.4 79.7 92.8 20.0 6.0 3.0 1.5 1.0 .8 .6 .5 .4 0.8 2.7 5.3 10.6 15.9 21.2 26.6 31.9 37.3 13.3 4.0 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.8 3.5 7.1 9.6 14.2 17.7 19.1 26.0 1252.0 113.0 28.0 7.0 3.1 1.8 1.1 0.8 0.6 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 N Uper oz-in Centr. Force Uper oz-in Centr. Force Uper oz-in Centr. Force Uper oz-in Centr. Force Uper oz-in Centr. Force Uper oz-in Centr. Force Copyright 1999 IRD Balancing DATA TABULATION
  • 9. STANDARDS COMPARISON A frequent question is, "How do the ISO 1940/1 quality grades compare with other balancing standards, such as API and MIL-STD-167-1?" A comparison graph and data tabulation appears in Figure 7. Three ISO grades (6.3, 2.5 and 1.0), MIL-STD-167-1 and API balance quality standards are compared in tabular and graphical form. In addition, Uper was calculated for a constant centrifugal force of 50 pounds (10% of static journal load). A symmetrical 1000 pound rotor with the C.G. midway between bearings and correction planes was used. Static load at each journal is 500 pounds and centrifugal force was calculated for each Uper. To more clearly show the relationship, a summary of balance quality standards and their corresponding centrifugal forces are shown in Table 2 as a percentage of journal static loading for 900, 1200, 1800 and 3600 RPM. Table 2 Centrifugal force as a percent of journal static load Uper = Permissible residual unbalance for each correction plane F = Centrifugal force due to residual unbalance L = Journal static load L = W/2 W = 1000 lbs. From the graph and Table 2, it is easy to see that the API standard demands a low residual unbalance level and with a smaller unbalance force load on the rotor's bearings. However, the effort to achieve this result may not always be cost effective. Published balance tolerances provide everyone with a common reference for communicating balance quality expectations, as well as what the provider promises. Proper interpretation and application of each is needed to realize satisfaction for everyone. BALANCE TERMINOLOGY BALANCE QUALITY GRADE - GXXX - for rigid rotors, G, is the product of specific unbalance, e, and rotor maximum service angular velocity. Service angular velocity is service RPM expressed in radians per second. G = e x v = constant CENTER OF GRAVITY - the point in a body through which the resultant of the weights of its component particles passes for all orientations of the body with respect to a gravitational field C.G. CORRECTION (BALANCING) PLANE - plane perpendicular to the shaft axis of a rotor in which correction for unbalance is made. COUPLE UNBALANCE - that condition of unbalance for which the central principal axis intersects the shaft axis at the center of gravity. CRITICAL SPEED - speed at which a system resonance is excited. The resonance may be of the journal supports (rigid mode) or flexure of the rotor (flexural mode). DYNAMIC UNBALANCE - that condition of unbalance for which the central principal axis is not parallel to and does not intersect the shaft axis. 8 Balance Quality Std. 900 RPM 1200 RPM 1800 RPM 3600 RPM Uper oz-in Uper oz-in Uper oz-in Uper oz-in F/L % F/L % F/L % F/L % ISO G6.3 ISO G2.5 MIL-STD ISO G1.0 API 21 8.3 4.4 3.3 2.2 6.0% 2.4% 1.3% 0.9% 0.6% 15.8 6.3 3.3 2.5 1.7 8.1% 3.2% 1.7% 1.3% 0.8% 10.5 4.2 2.2 1.7 1.1 12.0% 4.8% 2.5% 1.90% 1.3% 5.3 2.1 1.1 0.8 0.6 24.1% 9.6% 5.1% 3.7% 2.6%
  • 10. Note: Dynamic unbalance is equivalent to two unbalance vectors in two specified planes which completely represent the total unbalance of the rotor. Note: Dynamic unbalance may also be resolved into static and couple unbalance vectors whose vector sum is also equal to the total unbalance of the rotor. FLEXIBLE ROTOR - a rotor that does not satisfy the rigid rotor definition because of elastic deflection. PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL UNBALANCE Uper - the maximum residual unbalance permitted for a rotor or in a correction plane. Uper = eper x m where m = rotor mass PRINCIPAL INERTIA AXIS - the coordinate directions corresponding to the principal moments of inertia. In balancing, the term principal inertia axis is used to designate the central principal axis most nearly coincident with the shaft axis of the rotor. RESIDUAL (FINAL) UNBALANCE - the unbalance of any kind that remains after balancing. RIGID ROTOR - a rotor is considered rigid if its unbalance can be corrected in any two correction planes. After the correction, the residual unbalance does not change significantly at any speed up to the maximum service speed. ROTOR - a body capable of rotation which generally has journals supported by bearings. STATIC UNBALANCE - that condition of unbalance for which the central principal axis is displaced only parallel to the shaft axis. SPECIFIC UNBALANCE - static unbalance U divided by rotor mass m (i.e., mass eccentricity). Note: In the case of a rotor with two correction planes, specific unbalance may refer to the unbalance in one plane divided by rotor mass allocated to that plane. REFERENCES 1. ISO 1940/1, "Balance Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors." International Organization for Standardization. 2. ANSI S2. 19-1975, "Balance Quality Requirements of Rotating Rigid Bodies." American National Standards Institute. 3. BS 6861: Part 1, "Balance Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors." British Standards Institution. 4. VDI 2060, "Balance Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors." German Standards Institution. 5. Standard Paragraphs, API Subcommittee on Mechanical Equipment, Revision 19, September 1991. American Petroleum Institute. 6. MIL-STD-167-1 (SHIPS), 1 May 1974, "Mechanical Vibrations of Shipboard Equipment." Department of the Navy, Naval Ship Systems Command. 7. "DYNAMIC BALANCING HANDBOOK," October 1990, IRD Mechanalysis Inc. 8. ISO 1925, “Balancing Vocabulary.” International Organization for Standardization. 9
  • 11. USA: Louisville,KY 1.888.473.2251 phone 1.502.238.1001 fax UK: Chester 44.1244.538170 phone 44.1244.528900 fax USA Headquarters www.irdbalancing.com sales@irdbalancing.com MEXICO: Mexico City 52.55.5689.8325 phone 52.55.5689.8160 fax CANADA: Quebec 1.450.724.4066 phone 1.450.724.4077 fax IRD P/N E51267 Rev 2: Mar 2009