SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The life science business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt,
Germany operates as MilliporeSigma in the U.S. and
Canada.
How to develop a regulatory-compliant
Continued Process Verification (CPV)
and Process Monitoring of bioprocesses
Anshuman Bansal
December 5, 2019
The life science business
of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt,
Germany operates as
MilliporeSigma in the U.S.
and Canada
Agenda
1 Why
2
3
Monitoring Strategy
4
Statistical Process Control (CPV Basics)
Examples5
Other Visual Monitoring/Investigational Tools
WHY
Bioprocess data complexity
› Multi unit operations involving splits and combinations
› Uncertainty due to biological processes (inherent variability)
› Dynamic relationships shifted in time
› Changing correlation structures
CC1-Lot1 P1-LotA
P2-LotA F1-Lot1 F2-Lot1
Cell Culture Purification Filtration
CC1-Lot2
CC1-Lot3
CC2-Lot1
CC2-Lot2
P1-LotB
P1-LotC
P2-LotB F1-Lot2 F2-Lot2
*Reference: A. Bansal, J. Hans, A. Rathore; Knowledge Management and Process Monitoring of Pharmaceutical Processes in the Quality by Design Paradigm; Measurement,
Monitoring, Modelling and Control of Bioprocesses; Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology Volume 132, 2013, pp 217-247
Butterfly Effect: Unknown variability at process stages accumulates into product inconsistency
Seed Train
Cell Culture
Clarification
Capture
Purification
ProbabilityofError
Process Step/time
Formulation
Heterogeneity
of biotech
products
Variability
in process
and
analytical
methods
Variability in
quality of
raw
materials
High variability in
product quality
Complexities
associated with
biotech processes
and products
Limited
understanding
of biotech
processes
Regulatory Expectations (FDA, EMA)
Quality and regulatory expectations for
process monitoring
Pharmaceutical companies should plan and
execute a system for the monitoring of
process performance and product quality to
ensure a state of control is maintained
-ICH Q10
An ongoing program to collect and analyze product and process
data that relate to product quality must be established. The data
collected should include relevant process trends and quality of
incoming materials or components, in-process material, and
finished products.
-FDA Process Validation Guidance, Jan 2011
Regulatory Expectations (FDA)
FDA Expectations for CPV
Must have a system for detecting unplanned departures from the process
• Evaluate the performance of the process
• Identify Problems
• Determine if corrective action is necessary
• Anticipate and Prevent problems to ensure control
An ongoing program for collecting and analysing product and process data that relate
to product quality
• Procedures for data collection and trending
• Data collected should verify the quality attributes
• Intra-batch and inter-batch variation
• Data should be collected to evaluate process stability and capability
• Data should be statistically trended
• It is recommended that a statistician or person with adequate statistical training develop the data collection plans
and methods for analysis
Source: FDA Guidance for Industry: Process Validation: General Principles and Practices (Jan 2011)
Examples of some of the 483s issued by FDA
Monitoring Strategy
What to routinely monitor and what to
archive for investigational analysis?
Webinar: 	How to Develop a Regulatory-compliant Continued Process Verification (CPV) and Process Monitoring of Bioprocesses
Bench-top
Instrument Data
Quality Control
Results
Batch Record
Data
Real-time
Sensor Data
% DO
pH
Temperature
%CO2
N2
RPM
Air FLow
O2 Flow
CO2 Flow
Media Quantity
Media Blend Ratio
Harvest Age
Harvest Volume
Feed Age
Temperature shift Age
Feed Flow
Feed Quantity
Generation No.
Hold Times
Integrated Viable Cell Density
Inoculation Density
Titer
RVLP
Mycoplasma
MMV
Bioburden
Endotoxin
Cell Count
%Viability
pH(offline)
Glucose
Glutamate
Glutamine
Lactate
Ammonia
HCO3
Osmolality
Galactose
pCO2
pO2
Sodium
Potassium
Example: Mammalian Cell Culture
Upstream Process (Production Bioreactor)
Cell growth
Culture Environment
Product Formation
Contamination Control
Cell Density
Viabilities
Harvest (Viab, Age)
CGN
Glucose
Lactate
~Oxygen Flow
~DO
~pH
~Temp
Titer (Daily, Harvest)
CGN
Glycans
IVCC
Peak (VCD, Viab, Age)
Harvest (VCD)
GN
Feed (VCD, Viab, Age)
TempShift (VCD, Viab, Age)
Media (pH, Osmo, Endo)
~Air Flow
~Off Gas (OUR)
~CO2 Flow
Metabolites trend
Specific Productivity
Passage No
Events (Feed, Antifoam, Base etc)
Media Lots (Culture, Feed)
Total Base
Total Antifoam
Total Feed
Total Flow (O2, CO2, Air)
Specific metabolite consumption
pH Probe (ID, cycles)
DO Probe (ID, cycles)
CO2 Probe (ID, cycles)
~Agitation Speed
~Reactor Volume
~Overlay (Air flow)
~Pressure
Sterile Filters
Media Hold
~SIP trends (temp, pr)
CIP pre/post (pH, Conductivity)
Deviations, Root Cause, Change Control, MFR, Experiment ID,
Equipment ID, Process Time, Change Over
The Elements InvestigationSecondary MonitoringPrimary Monitoring
Example: Mammalian Cell Culture
Routinely Monitor
% DO
pH
Temperature
Harvest Age
Harvest Volume
Integrated Viable Cell Density
Titer
Bioburden
Endotoxin
Cell Count
%Viability
pH(offline)
Glucose
Lactate
Osmolality
Collect and Archive
%CO2
N2
RPM
Air FLow
O2 Flow
CO2 Flow
Feed Age
Temperature shift Age
Feed Flow
Feed Quantity
Generation No.
Hold Times
Inoculation Density
RVLP
Mycoplasma
Glutamate
Glutamine
Ammonia
HCO3
Galactose
pCO2
pO2
Sodium
Potassium
Media Quantity
Media Blend Ratio
Example: Mammalian Cell Culture
Poll question 1
Statistical
process
control (SPC)
Parameter Type Abbreviation Description Routine Monitoring
Critical Process
Parameter
CPP
A performance or input parameter that
directly impacts product identity, purity,
quality or safety.
Must
Key Process
Parameter
KPP
A performance or input parameter that
directly impacts CCPs or used to
measure the consistency of the process
step
Must
Monitored
Parameter
MP
A performance or input parameter that
may or may not impact KPPs and is used
to measure the consistency of the
process step or routinely trended for
troubleshooting purposes
Not All, Case By Case
Basis
What to SPC?
Limit Name Abbreviations Description Limits Source
Applicable to
Parameter type
Specification
Limits
USL, LSL
These limits are defined based on process
characterization limits. Any excursion from
these limits will cause OOS and batch
rejection.
Process
Characterization,
Process
Development
CPP
Action Limits UAL, LAL
These limits are process validation ranges.
Any excursion from these limits will cause
major process deviation or discrepancy.
Process Validation CPP, KPP
Alert Limits
or
Statistical
Control Limits
UCL, LCL
These are monitoring ranges derived from
historical runs for out of trend detection and
measurement of process consistency.
Statistical: Process
History >15
commercial batches
CPP, KPP, MP
Target CL
The target (or centerline) is derived again
from historical runs as a measure to keep
the process consistent and proactively alert
if process is deviating from set target.
Statistical: Process
History >15
commercial batches
All
What SPC limits to apply?
How to estimate statistical control limits?
Distribution Sample Graph Description and Examples Typical Limits applied
Normal
Most of the process parameters will
follow this distribution of a
normal/Gaussian bell shaped curve.
Non-Normal
(Beta or
Gamma)
Some parameters will not follow a normal
distribution pattern and follow a skewed
distribution. For example most of the data
related to process impurities will be
skewed towards the lower bound
(approaching a value of 0). Some
parameters like cell viabilities would be
skewed towards the upper bound
(approaching a value of 100%).
CL Average
UCL Average + 3 SD
LCL Average - 3 SD
CL Median
UCL 99.865th Percentile
LCL 0.135th Percentile
How to identify a trend? (Example : Nelsons’ Rules)Table 6 [2]
Rule Description Chart Example Problem Indicated
Rule 1
One point is more
than 3 standard
deviations from the
mean.
One sample (two shown
in this case) is grossly
out of control.
Rule 2
Nine (or more)
points in a row are
on the same side of
the mean.
Some
prolonged bias exists.
Rule 3
Six (or more) points
in a row are
continually
increasing (or
decreasing).
A trend exists.
Rule 4
Fourteen (or more)
points in a row
alternate in
direction,
increasing then
decreasing.
This much oscillation is
beyond noise.
This is directional and
the position of the mean
and size of the standard
deviation do not affect
this rule.
Determining Process Capability and Process Performance
A. Estimating Process Capability for Normally Distributed Data
Process capability (Ppk, Cpk) for a normally distributed monitoring process parameter will be calculated using the following:
Ppk = 𝒎𝒊𝒏{
𝑼𝑺𝑳−𝑨𝒗𝒈
𝟑𝝈
,
𝑨𝒗𝒈−𝑳𝑺𝑳
𝟑𝝈
}, Cpk = 𝒎𝒊𝒏{
𝑼𝑺𝑳−𝑨𝒗𝒈
𝟑𝝈 𝑴𝑹
,
𝑨𝒗𝒈−𝑳𝑺𝑳
𝟑𝝈 𝑴𝑹
}
Where
USL = Upper Specification Limit (for CPP) or Upper Action Limit (for KPP)
LSL = Lower Specification Limit (for CPP) or Upper Action Limit (for KPP)
Avg = Average or mean of the population under analysis
𝜎 = Standard deviation of the population under analysis
𝜎 𝑀𝑅 = Moving Range Standard Deviation
B. Estimating Process Capability for Non-normally Distributed Data
Since the average and standard deviations will not represent the non-normally distributed data correctly, process capability (Cpk) cannot be estimated
for non-normal data. Instead Process performance (Ppk) will be evaluated based on all of data points in terms of percentile ranges. For a non-normally
distributed monitoring process parameter Ppk will be calculated using the following:
Ppk = 𝒎𝒊𝒏{
𝑼𝑺𝑳−𝑿 𝟎.𝟓𝟎
𝑿 𝟎.𝟗𝟗𝟖𝟔𝟓− 𝑿 𝟎.𝟓𝟎
,
𝑿 𝟎.𝟓𝟎−𝑳𝑺𝑳
𝑿 𝟎.𝟓𝟎−𝑿 𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟓
}
Where
USL = Upper Specification Limit (for CPP) or Upper Action Limit (for KPP)
LSL = Lower Specification Limit (for CPP) or Upper Action Limit (for KPP)
X0.50 = Median of the population under analysis
X0.99865 = 99.865th Percentile of the population under analysis
X0.00135 = 0.135th Percentile of the population under analysis
Significance of Process Capability
Ideally : (USL-LSL) >> 6σ
Goal of CPV
Process Evolution with time
ControlLimits
Specificationor
ActionLimits
A Process Control Chart
2
3
3
2
Process Capability
Trend rules violation
Centerline
Setting up a SPC based monitoring program
Identify CPP, KPP and MP
from performance and
operating parameters
from process
characterization/validatio
n documents
1
Evaluate the root cause
of each rule violation and
is impact on product and
process. Initiate
appropriate CAPA if
needed.
8
Publish quarterly process
summary reports (can
feed APRs). Will have
recommendations for
process improvements
and limit updates
9
Identify parameters that need
to be trended periodically
2 Get validation ranges and
specification limits (if any) for
these parameters respectively
3 Establish a technique for
statistical control limits and
frequency to update the
control limits
4
Monitor parameters against
set limits
7 Publish an in-process control
and monitoring document for
each commercial process
6
Establish trending rules
(Nelson Rules)
5
Update control limits in the
system upon every limit
update via a change control
11Update
Control Limit
10
CPV related procedures and documentation
.
CPVDocumentation
1
2
3
Statistical Process Control – SPC Phase
SPC Phase
Gather Data for
future
trending.
Monitor only
with action or
spec limits.
Set Alert limits
(UCL, LCL and
Target) based
on stats of
gathered
history (and
excluding any
special cause
outliers).
Setting Alert Limits
After setting Alert Limits (UCL, LCL and Target)
from data gathering phase, routine process
monitoring is done in this SPC phase and all future
batches are compared against these set limits.
Preliminary Process Monitoring – PPM Phase
(Data gathering Phase)
How it shows up in real life
PPM Phase
Poll question 2
Other Process
Monitoring and
Troubleshooting Aids
Investigation Analysis Toolset
Timelines
Readymade
process
execution
times
Lot Genealogy
On the fly generate
full genealogy from
vial (cell line) to
vial (drug product)
Profiles
Overlay
batch
profiles
Correlations
Find
correlations
across
Parameters
SQC
Control
charting for
batch trends
and six sigma
analysis
Multivariate
Understand
interactions and
discover new
correlations in
ever dynamic
relationships
Compare groups
Compare groups of
data within batch or
across batches to
examine differences
Records
Access to raw
execution
records data
for context
and reference
When
What
How
Why
Is there
precedence?
What’s
the
benchmark?
How far
from
target?
TheQuestions
TheAnswers
Investigation Toolset
SS0101
Spinner Stage
SF0101
Seed Fermentation
PF0101
Fermentation
DS0101-1
HIC-Chromatography
SF0102
Seed Fermentation
DS0101-2
HIC-Chromatography
P0101
BDS
SS0102
Spinner Stage
RM0301
RM0302
RM0303
RM0102
RM0101
RM0103
RM0201
RM0102
RM0101
RM0101
RM0101
RM0401
RM0402
RM0501
RM0502
RM0601
RM0602
RM0603
RM0701
RM0702
RM0703
Lot Genealogy
Intra-batch variations
Intra-batch variations
Correlations: Upstream vs Downstream
Grouping batches for comparability
Process equipment differences
Example stories
How the toolset is applied for
troubleshooting
YieldVariability
Note: All Charts except indicated were generated in ProcessPad
Roundinganddistribution
Analyst Used JMP
for this analysis
* Analyst Used JMP
for this analysis
Note: All Charts except indicated were generated in ProcessPad
InstrumentMaintenance
Note: All Charts except indicated were generated in ProcessPad
Poll question 3
T
Thank you!
The vibrant M, and Millipore are trademarks of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective
owners. Detailed information on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources.
© 2019 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

More Related Content

PDF
An Efficient and cGMP-friendly Solution to Diafiltration for Intensified or C...
PDF
Find your filter. What’s best for your process?
PDF
Facility Intensification and Cost Reduction using an Integrated Buffer Delive...
PDF
Membrane Chromatography Solutions for Single-Use, Intensified mAb Purification
PDF
Using Single-use Technology to Overcome the Challenges of ADC Processing
PDF
Webinar: Novel Perfusion Filter and Controller for N-1 Application
PDF
A Cost Analysis and Evaluation of Perfused Seed Train Scenarios Through Proce...
PDF
Straight to the Point: Reaching Clinical Stage Development with a CHOZN® Cell...
An Efficient and cGMP-friendly Solution to Diafiltration for Intensified or C...
Find your filter. What’s best for your process?
Facility Intensification and Cost Reduction using an Integrated Buffer Delive...
Membrane Chromatography Solutions for Single-Use, Intensified mAb Purification
Using Single-use Technology to Overcome the Challenges of ADC Processing
Webinar: Novel Perfusion Filter and Controller for N-1 Application
A Cost Analysis and Evaluation of Perfused Seed Train Scenarios Through Proce...
Straight to the Point: Reaching Clinical Stage Development with a CHOZN® Cell...

What's hot (14)

PDF
Process Intensification for future bioprocessing
PDF
Implementing and Managing Pre-use Post-sterilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT)
PDF
Total cost of ownership – how the choice of excipients makes your economics
PPTX
Aseptic Process Sampling to address Risk of Contamination & Containment in co...
PDF
Media and Process Development for Seed Train Intensification
PDF
Fast-track solutions to address challenges with Host Cell Proteins in early d...
PPT
Custom Affinity Chromatography for Vaccine Purification: A New PD Paradigm
PDF
How to reach High Plasma Protein Concentration with Single-Pass TFF
PDF
Process Development for Continuous Flow-Through Polishing Purification for mA...
PPTX
Implementing a Fully Single-Use, Integrated mAb Biosimilars Purification Plat...
PPTX
Bioburden control: Strategies to address bioburden control in downstream proc...
PDF
Process development guidance for AAV and lentivirus manufacturing based on co...
PDF
Hot melt extrusion with PVA: A new opportunity for challenging APIs
PDF
Better Bioprocessing Efficiency Through Centralized Orchestration
Process Intensification for future bioprocessing
Implementing and Managing Pre-use Post-sterilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT)
Total cost of ownership – how the choice of excipients makes your economics
Aseptic Process Sampling to address Risk of Contamination & Containment in co...
Media and Process Development for Seed Train Intensification
Fast-track solutions to address challenges with Host Cell Proteins in early d...
Custom Affinity Chromatography for Vaccine Purification: A New PD Paradigm
How to reach High Plasma Protein Concentration with Single-Pass TFF
Process Development for Continuous Flow-Through Polishing Purification for mA...
Implementing a Fully Single-Use, Integrated mAb Biosimilars Purification Plat...
Bioburden control: Strategies to address bioburden control in downstream proc...
Process development guidance for AAV and lentivirus manufacturing based on co...
Hot melt extrusion with PVA: A new opportunity for challenging APIs
Better Bioprocessing Efficiency Through Centralized Orchestration
Ad

Similar to Webinar: How to Develop a Regulatory-compliant Continued Process Verification (CPV) and Process Monitoring of Bioprocesses (20)

PPTX
Process improvment
PPTX
ISPE 2011 presentation Dagmar Meissner - 13Jan2011
PPTX
CPV Acceptance Criteria and Conditions SK09Aug16
PPTX
Regulatory expectation & design approach on continuous process verification
PPTX
Alert Action and Specification Limits for Bioburden and Endotoxin - SK26Feb15...
PPTX
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL satyam raj.pptx
PPTX
CPV Slides SK11Aug16 - Part 1 only
PPT
Pharsight RAS Expertise
PDF
Analytical QBD -CPHI 25-27 July R00
DOCX
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL
PPT
introduction to statistical quality control.ppt
PPTX
Application of microbiological data
PPT
App. Of Stat. Tools
PDF
DI workshop.pdf
PPTX
Life cycle of analytical method
PPTX
Quality Control In Clinical Laboratory
PPTX
5-Scientific Approach to Validation.pptx
PPT
Stochastic Process
PPT
090528 Miller Process Forensics Talk @ Asq
PPTX
Preparation of SOPs and Analytical reports.pptx
Process improvment
ISPE 2011 presentation Dagmar Meissner - 13Jan2011
CPV Acceptance Criteria and Conditions SK09Aug16
Regulatory expectation & design approach on continuous process verification
Alert Action and Specification Limits for Bioburden and Endotoxin - SK26Feb15...
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL satyam raj.pptx
CPV Slides SK11Aug16 - Part 1 only
Pharsight RAS Expertise
Analytical QBD -CPHI 25-27 July R00
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL
introduction to statistical quality control.ppt
Application of microbiological data
App. Of Stat. Tools
DI workshop.pdf
Life cycle of analytical method
Quality Control In Clinical Laboratory
5-Scientific Approach to Validation.pptx
Stochastic Process
090528 Miller Process Forensics Talk @ Asq
Preparation of SOPs and Analytical reports.pptx
Ad

More from MilliporeSigma (20)

PDF
Launch of our new Titanium Dioxide Alternative
PDF
The Viscosity Reduction Platform: Viscosity-reducing excipients for improveme...
PDF
Use of Excipients in Downstream Processing to Improve Protein Purification
PDF
Exploring the protein stabilizing capability of surfactants against agitation...
PDF
The Viscosity Reduction Platform: Viscosity Reducing Excipients for Protein F...
PDF
Characterization of monoclonal antibodies and Antibody drug conjugates by Sur...
PDF
The Role of BioPhorum Extractables Data in the Effective Adoption of Single-U...
PDF
The Future of Pharma- and Biopharmaceutical Audits
PDF
Moving your Gene Therapy from R&D to IND: How to navigate the Regulatory Land...
PDF
Identity testing by NGS as a means of risk mitigation for viral gene therapies
PDF
Latest advancements of melt based 3D printing technologies for oral drug deli...
PDF
CAR-T Manufacturing Innovations that Work - Automating Low Volume Processes a...
PDF
How does the ICH Q5A revision impact viral safety strategies for biologics?
PDF
Improve Operational Efficiency by Over 30% with Product, Process, & Systems A...
PDF
Insights from a Global Collaboration Accelerating Vaccine Development with an...
PDF
Risk-Based Qualification of X-Ray Sterilization for Single-Use Systems
PDF
Rapid Replication Competent Adenovirus (rRCA) Detection: Accelerate your Lot ...
PDF
The High Intensity Sweeteners Neotame and Sucralose: 2 Ways to ace the Patien...
PDF
The Developability Classification System (DCS): Enabling an Optimized Approac...
PDF
How to Accelerate and Enhance ADC Therapies
Launch of our new Titanium Dioxide Alternative
The Viscosity Reduction Platform: Viscosity-reducing excipients for improveme...
Use of Excipients in Downstream Processing to Improve Protein Purification
Exploring the protein stabilizing capability of surfactants against agitation...
The Viscosity Reduction Platform: Viscosity Reducing Excipients for Protein F...
Characterization of monoclonal antibodies and Antibody drug conjugates by Sur...
The Role of BioPhorum Extractables Data in the Effective Adoption of Single-U...
The Future of Pharma- and Biopharmaceutical Audits
Moving your Gene Therapy from R&D to IND: How to navigate the Regulatory Land...
Identity testing by NGS as a means of risk mitigation for viral gene therapies
Latest advancements of melt based 3D printing technologies for oral drug deli...
CAR-T Manufacturing Innovations that Work - Automating Low Volume Processes a...
How does the ICH Q5A revision impact viral safety strategies for biologics?
Improve Operational Efficiency by Over 30% with Product, Process, & Systems A...
Insights from a Global Collaboration Accelerating Vaccine Development with an...
Risk-Based Qualification of X-Ray Sterilization for Single-Use Systems
Rapid Replication Competent Adenovirus (rRCA) Detection: Accelerate your Lot ...
The High Intensity Sweeteners Neotame and Sucralose: 2 Ways to ace the Patien...
The Developability Classification System (DCS): Enabling an Optimized Approac...
How to Accelerate and Enhance ADC Therapies

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Back node with known primary managementt
DOCX
PT10 continues to explose your mind right after reading
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 18
PDF
demography and familyplanning-181222172149.pdf
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 13
PDF
cerebral aneurysm.. neurosurgery , anaesthesia
PDF
chapter 14.pdf Ch+12+SGOB.docx hilighted important stuff on exa,
PPT
12.08.2025 Dr. Amrita Ghosh_Stocks Standards_ Smart_Inventory Management_GCLP...
PPTX
POSTURE.pptx......,............. .........
PPTX
Newer Technologies in medical field.pptx
PPTX
Understanding The Self : 1Sexual health
PPTX
GCP GUIDELINES 2025 mmch workshop .pptx
PDF
crisisintervention-210721062718.presentatiodnf
PDF
_OB Finals 24.pdf notes for pregnant women
PPTX
DeployedMedicineMedical EquipmentTCCC.pptx
PPTX
HIGHLIGHTS of NDCT 2019 WITH IMPACT ON CLINICAL RESEARCH.pptx
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 7
PPTX
Fever and skin rash - Approach.pptxBy Dr Gururaja R , Paediatrician. An usef...
PDF
Zuri Health Pan-African Digital Health Innovator.pdf
PPTX
Full Slide Deck - SY CF Talk Adelaide 10June.pptx
Back node with known primary managementt
PT10 continues to explose your mind right after reading
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 18
demography and familyplanning-181222172149.pdf
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 13
cerebral aneurysm.. neurosurgery , anaesthesia
chapter 14.pdf Ch+12+SGOB.docx hilighted important stuff on exa,
12.08.2025 Dr. Amrita Ghosh_Stocks Standards_ Smart_Inventory Management_GCLP...
POSTURE.pptx......,............. .........
Newer Technologies in medical field.pptx
Understanding The Self : 1Sexual health
GCP GUIDELINES 2025 mmch workshop .pptx
crisisintervention-210721062718.presentatiodnf
_OB Finals 24.pdf notes for pregnant women
DeployedMedicineMedical EquipmentTCCC.pptx
HIGHLIGHTS of NDCT 2019 WITH IMPACT ON CLINICAL RESEARCH.pptx
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 7
Fever and skin rash - Approach.pptxBy Dr Gururaja R , Paediatrician. An usef...
Zuri Health Pan-African Digital Health Innovator.pdf
Full Slide Deck - SY CF Talk Adelaide 10June.pptx

Webinar: How to Develop a Regulatory-compliant Continued Process Verification (CPV) and Process Monitoring of Bioprocesses

  • 1. The life science business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany operates as MilliporeSigma in the U.S. and Canada. How to develop a regulatory-compliant Continued Process Verification (CPV) and Process Monitoring of bioprocesses Anshuman Bansal December 5, 2019
  • 2. The life science business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany operates as MilliporeSigma in the U.S. and Canada
  • 3. Agenda 1 Why 2 3 Monitoring Strategy 4 Statistical Process Control (CPV Basics) Examples5 Other Visual Monitoring/Investigational Tools
  • 4. WHY
  • 5. Bioprocess data complexity › Multi unit operations involving splits and combinations › Uncertainty due to biological processes (inherent variability) › Dynamic relationships shifted in time › Changing correlation structures CC1-Lot1 P1-LotA P2-LotA F1-Lot1 F2-Lot1 Cell Culture Purification Filtration CC1-Lot2 CC1-Lot3 CC2-Lot1 CC2-Lot2 P1-LotB P1-LotC P2-LotB F1-Lot2 F2-Lot2 *Reference: A. Bansal, J. Hans, A. Rathore; Knowledge Management and Process Monitoring of Pharmaceutical Processes in the Quality by Design Paradigm; Measurement, Monitoring, Modelling and Control of Bioprocesses; Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology Volume 132, 2013, pp 217-247
  • 6. Butterfly Effect: Unknown variability at process stages accumulates into product inconsistency Seed Train Cell Culture Clarification Capture Purification ProbabilityofError Process Step/time Formulation Heterogeneity of biotech products Variability in process and analytical methods Variability in quality of raw materials High variability in product quality Complexities associated with biotech processes and products Limited understanding of biotech processes
  • 7. Regulatory Expectations (FDA, EMA) Quality and regulatory expectations for process monitoring Pharmaceutical companies should plan and execute a system for the monitoring of process performance and product quality to ensure a state of control is maintained -ICH Q10 An ongoing program to collect and analyze product and process data that relate to product quality must be established. The data collected should include relevant process trends and quality of incoming materials or components, in-process material, and finished products. -FDA Process Validation Guidance, Jan 2011
  • 8. Regulatory Expectations (FDA) FDA Expectations for CPV Must have a system for detecting unplanned departures from the process • Evaluate the performance of the process • Identify Problems • Determine if corrective action is necessary • Anticipate and Prevent problems to ensure control An ongoing program for collecting and analysing product and process data that relate to product quality • Procedures for data collection and trending • Data collected should verify the quality attributes • Intra-batch and inter-batch variation • Data should be collected to evaluate process stability and capability • Data should be statistically trended • It is recommended that a statistician or person with adequate statistical training develop the data collection plans and methods for analysis Source: FDA Guidance for Industry: Process Validation: General Principles and Practices (Jan 2011)
  • 9. Examples of some of the 483s issued by FDA
  • 10. Monitoring Strategy What to routinely monitor and what to archive for investigational analysis?
  • 12. Bench-top Instrument Data Quality Control Results Batch Record Data Real-time Sensor Data % DO pH Temperature %CO2 N2 RPM Air FLow O2 Flow CO2 Flow Media Quantity Media Blend Ratio Harvest Age Harvest Volume Feed Age Temperature shift Age Feed Flow Feed Quantity Generation No. Hold Times Integrated Viable Cell Density Inoculation Density Titer RVLP Mycoplasma MMV Bioburden Endotoxin Cell Count %Viability pH(offline) Glucose Glutamate Glutamine Lactate Ammonia HCO3 Osmolality Galactose pCO2 pO2 Sodium Potassium Example: Mammalian Cell Culture
  • 13. Upstream Process (Production Bioreactor) Cell growth Culture Environment Product Formation Contamination Control Cell Density Viabilities Harvest (Viab, Age) CGN Glucose Lactate ~Oxygen Flow ~DO ~pH ~Temp Titer (Daily, Harvest) CGN Glycans IVCC Peak (VCD, Viab, Age) Harvest (VCD) GN Feed (VCD, Viab, Age) TempShift (VCD, Viab, Age) Media (pH, Osmo, Endo) ~Air Flow ~Off Gas (OUR) ~CO2 Flow Metabolites trend Specific Productivity Passage No Events (Feed, Antifoam, Base etc) Media Lots (Culture, Feed) Total Base Total Antifoam Total Feed Total Flow (O2, CO2, Air) Specific metabolite consumption pH Probe (ID, cycles) DO Probe (ID, cycles) CO2 Probe (ID, cycles) ~Agitation Speed ~Reactor Volume ~Overlay (Air flow) ~Pressure Sterile Filters Media Hold ~SIP trends (temp, pr) CIP pre/post (pH, Conductivity) Deviations, Root Cause, Change Control, MFR, Experiment ID, Equipment ID, Process Time, Change Over The Elements InvestigationSecondary MonitoringPrimary Monitoring Example: Mammalian Cell Culture
  • 14. Routinely Monitor % DO pH Temperature Harvest Age Harvest Volume Integrated Viable Cell Density Titer Bioburden Endotoxin Cell Count %Viability pH(offline) Glucose Lactate Osmolality Collect and Archive %CO2 N2 RPM Air FLow O2 Flow CO2 Flow Feed Age Temperature shift Age Feed Flow Feed Quantity Generation No. Hold Times Inoculation Density RVLP Mycoplasma Glutamate Glutamine Ammonia HCO3 Galactose pCO2 pO2 Sodium Potassium Media Quantity Media Blend Ratio Example: Mammalian Cell Culture
  • 17. Parameter Type Abbreviation Description Routine Monitoring Critical Process Parameter CPP A performance or input parameter that directly impacts product identity, purity, quality or safety. Must Key Process Parameter KPP A performance or input parameter that directly impacts CCPs or used to measure the consistency of the process step Must Monitored Parameter MP A performance or input parameter that may or may not impact KPPs and is used to measure the consistency of the process step or routinely trended for troubleshooting purposes Not All, Case By Case Basis What to SPC?
  • 18. Limit Name Abbreviations Description Limits Source Applicable to Parameter type Specification Limits USL, LSL These limits are defined based on process characterization limits. Any excursion from these limits will cause OOS and batch rejection. Process Characterization, Process Development CPP Action Limits UAL, LAL These limits are process validation ranges. Any excursion from these limits will cause major process deviation or discrepancy. Process Validation CPP, KPP Alert Limits or Statistical Control Limits UCL, LCL These are monitoring ranges derived from historical runs for out of trend detection and measurement of process consistency. Statistical: Process History >15 commercial batches CPP, KPP, MP Target CL The target (or centerline) is derived again from historical runs as a measure to keep the process consistent and proactively alert if process is deviating from set target. Statistical: Process History >15 commercial batches All What SPC limits to apply?
  • 19. How to estimate statistical control limits? Distribution Sample Graph Description and Examples Typical Limits applied Normal Most of the process parameters will follow this distribution of a normal/Gaussian bell shaped curve. Non-Normal (Beta or Gamma) Some parameters will not follow a normal distribution pattern and follow a skewed distribution. For example most of the data related to process impurities will be skewed towards the lower bound (approaching a value of 0). Some parameters like cell viabilities would be skewed towards the upper bound (approaching a value of 100%). CL Average UCL Average + 3 SD LCL Average - 3 SD CL Median UCL 99.865th Percentile LCL 0.135th Percentile
  • 20. How to identify a trend? (Example : Nelsons’ Rules)Table 6 [2] Rule Description Chart Example Problem Indicated Rule 1 One point is more than 3 standard deviations from the mean. One sample (two shown in this case) is grossly out of control. Rule 2 Nine (or more) points in a row are on the same side of the mean. Some prolonged bias exists. Rule 3 Six (or more) points in a row are continually increasing (or decreasing). A trend exists. Rule 4 Fourteen (or more) points in a row alternate in direction, increasing then decreasing. This much oscillation is beyond noise. This is directional and the position of the mean and size of the standard deviation do not affect this rule.
  • 21. Determining Process Capability and Process Performance A. Estimating Process Capability for Normally Distributed Data Process capability (Ppk, Cpk) for a normally distributed monitoring process parameter will be calculated using the following: Ppk = 𝒎𝒊𝒏{ 𝑼𝑺𝑳−𝑨𝒗𝒈 𝟑𝝈 , 𝑨𝒗𝒈−𝑳𝑺𝑳 𝟑𝝈 }, Cpk = 𝒎𝒊𝒏{ 𝑼𝑺𝑳−𝑨𝒗𝒈 𝟑𝝈 𝑴𝑹 , 𝑨𝒗𝒈−𝑳𝑺𝑳 𝟑𝝈 𝑴𝑹 } Where USL = Upper Specification Limit (for CPP) or Upper Action Limit (for KPP) LSL = Lower Specification Limit (for CPP) or Upper Action Limit (for KPP) Avg = Average or mean of the population under analysis 𝜎 = Standard deviation of the population under analysis 𝜎 𝑀𝑅 = Moving Range Standard Deviation B. Estimating Process Capability for Non-normally Distributed Data Since the average and standard deviations will not represent the non-normally distributed data correctly, process capability (Cpk) cannot be estimated for non-normal data. Instead Process performance (Ppk) will be evaluated based on all of data points in terms of percentile ranges. For a non-normally distributed monitoring process parameter Ppk will be calculated using the following: Ppk = 𝒎𝒊𝒏{ 𝑼𝑺𝑳−𝑿 𝟎.𝟓𝟎 𝑿 𝟎.𝟗𝟗𝟖𝟔𝟓− 𝑿 𝟎.𝟓𝟎 , 𝑿 𝟎.𝟓𝟎−𝑳𝑺𝑳 𝑿 𝟎.𝟓𝟎−𝑿 𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟓 } Where USL = Upper Specification Limit (for CPP) or Upper Action Limit (for KPP) LSL = Lower Specification Limit (for CPP) or Upper Action Limit (for KPP) X0.50 = Median of the population under analysis X0.99865 = 99.865th Percentile of the population under analysis X0.00135 = 0.135th Percentile of the population under analysis
  • 22. Significance of Process Capability Ideally : (USL-LSL) >> 6σ
  • 23. Goal of CPV Process Evolution with time
  • 24. ControlLimits Specificationor ActionLimits A Process Control Chart 2 3 3 2 Process Capability Trend rules violation Centerline
  • 25. Setting up a SPC based monitoring program Identify CPP, KPP and MP from performance and operating parameters from process characterization/validatio n documents 1 Evaluate the root cause of each rule violation and is impact on product and process. Initiate appropriate CAPA if needed. 8 Publish quarterly process summary reports (can feed APRs). Will have recommendations for process improvements and limit updates 9 Identify parameters that need to be trended periodically 2 Get validation ranges and specification limits (if any) for these parameters respectively 3 Establish a technique for statistical control limits and frequency to update the control limits 4 Monitor parameters against set limits 7 Publish an in-process control and monitoring document for each commercial process 6 Establish trending rules (Nelson Rules) 5 Update control limits in the system upon every limit update via a change control 11Update Control Limit 10
  • 26. CPV related procedures and documentation . CPVDocumentation 1 2 3
  • 27. Statistical Process Control – SPC Phase SPC Phase Gather Data for future trending. Monitor only with action or spec limits. Set Alert limits (UCL, LCL and Target) based on stats of gathered history (and excluding any special cause outliers). Setting Alert Limits After setting Alert Limits (UCL, LCL and Target) from data gathering phase, routine process monitoring is done in this SPC phase and all future batches are compared against these set limits. Preliminary Process Monitoring – PPM Phase (Data gathering Phase) How it shows up in real life PPM Phase
  • 29. Other Process Monitoring and Troubleshooting Aids Investigation Analysis Toolset
  • 30. Timelines Readymade process execution times Lot Genealogy On the fly generate full genealogy from vial (cell line) to vial (drug product) Profiles Overlay batch profiles Correlations Find correlations across Parameters SQC Control charting for batch trends and six sigma analysis Multivariate Understand interactions and discover new correlations in ever dynamic relationships Compare groups Compare groups of data within batch or across batches to examine differences Records Access to raw execution records data for context and reference When What How Why Is there precedence? What’s the benchmark? How far from target? TheQuestions TheAnswers Investigation Toolset
  • 31. SS0101 Spinner Stage SF0101 Seed Fermentation PF0101 Fermentation DS0101-1 HIC-Chromatography SF0102 Seed Fermentation DS0101-2 HIC-Chromatography P0101 BDS SS0102 Spinner Stage RM0301 RM0302 RM0303 RM0102 RM0101 RM0103 RM0201 RM0102 RM0101 RM0101 RM0101 RM0401 RM0402 RM0501 RM0502 RM0601 RM0602 RM0603 RM0701 RM0702 RM0703 Lot Genealogy
  • 35. Grouping batches for comparability
  • 37. Example stories How the toolset is applied for troubleshooting
  • 38. YieldVariability Note: All Charts except indicated were generated in ProcessPad
  • 39. Roundinganddistribution Analyst Used JMP for this analysis * Analyst Used JMP for this analysis Note: All Charts except indicated were generated in ProcessPad
  • 40. InstrumentMaintenance Note: All Charts except indicated were generated in ProcessPad
  • 43. The vibrant M, and Millipore are trademarks of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Detailed information on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources. © 2019 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.