SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Integrated Buffer Delivery and
Management for Facility
Intensification and Cost Reduction
The BioContinuum™
Platform
1
Shannon J. Ryan, Ph.D.
2 May 2019
The life science business of
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
operates as MilliporeSigma
in the U.S. and Canada.
Speed
Reduce new facility build
times by 70%. Compress
production lead time by
80%.
Quality
10X robustness.
90% reduction in cost of
poor quality.
Flexibility
Reduce product change-over
time by 90%.
Cost
90% reduction in cost to
manufacture and CAPEX.
Business
Drivers
Market
Growth
Uncertainty
New Product
Classes
Cost
Pressure
Market
Trends
Market Trends, Business Drivers and Key Enablers to
Drive Next Generation BioProcessing:
Process
Intensification
Process
Analytics
Software &
Automation
Key
Enablers
Single Use
3
Next Generation Processing:
Evolutionary Journey in mAb Manufacturing
End state
Today
Near-term
Mid-term
Process
Batch
Intensified
Connected
Continuous
Format
Stainless
Hybrid
Single Use
SU/Closed
4
Our
Mission
Developing technologies,
applications and
expertise which enable
biotherapeutic
manufacturers to
confidently enter the era
of next generation
processing.
Topics
1 Buffer Preparation Overview
2 Preparation cost Models
3 Integrated Delivery & Management
4 Summary
5
Buffer preparation is an essential function but does not add value
1 Buffer Prep Is a Core Operation
Drives plant schedule and capacity
2
Critical, But not Value-Added
Imbalance between resources &
footprint required and simplicity of
buffer prep
On-site buffer
Preparation
Dilution of
Buffer
Concentrates
Buffer Conditioning
or blending
Ready-t0-use
buffers
Requirements:
5-10 L buffer per L bioreactor
15 Unique buffers
Critical attributes for process performance
6
7
Challenges in Buffer Preparation require new approaches
Problem Statement:
How do we provide the right buffer at
the right time and specifications while
minimizing our labor and footprint?
On-site buffer
Preparation
Buffer Conditioning
or blending
Ready-t0-use
buffers
Traditional Buffer Preparation Pain
Points :
1. Large amount of classified floor space
2. Significant Labor Requirements
3. Buffer volumes that grow linearly with
Bioreactor Titer
4. Quality Control testing
5. Excess Capacity to account for preparation
error
Dilution of
Buffer
Concentrates
8
Significant Desire to Move toward Outsourced Buffer Preparation
87
44
28
19
6 9
100100
Today
3
4
5 years from
now MEAN
adoption
Ready to use buffers Automated buffer conditioning system Dilution of buffer concentrates Standard mix vessel
70
34
43
20
30
29
28
18
10 8 10
100
0
100
Clinical (n=8) Commercial
(n=15)
Preclinical (n=4)
100
5 years
expectation
breakdown by
manufacturing
scale
Intensified buffer preparation will increase from 7% to 47% by 2023
Topics
1 Buffer Preparation Overview
2 Preparation cost Models
3 Integrated Delivery & Management
4 Summary
9
10
Made In House (MIH)
• Buffer chemicals hydrated in mix
tanks, filtered, and QC-released
prior to use
• Single Use mixers and hold
vessels used up to 2,000 L; SS
vessels at > 2,000L
Ready to Use (RTU)
• Buffers shipped to site at ready to
use concentration.
• Transported in single use vessels
up to 1,000 L
• QC-released prior to use
Buffer Concentrates (CONC)
• Buffer concentrates (10x for cost
models) shipped to site
• QC-released prior to use
• Concentrates diluted into hold
vessels using automated system
3 Buffer Preparation Methods for Cost Models
11
MAb Facility Considerations for Buffer Preparation Scenarios
Design
Variables
Values Modeled
Facility Scale
200 L, 2000 L, & 5 X 2000 L
Fed-batch Bioreactors
MAb Titer 1 g/L, 5 g/L, and 10 g/L
Run Rate 12 & 20 batches/year
12
Impact of Buffer Preparation Method on Facility Design
18% Reduction in Cleanroom Area Utilizing Buffer Concentrates
On-Site Buffer Preparation
970 m2 manufacturing cleanroom
Ready to Use Buffers
914 m2 manufacturing cleanroom
6% cleanroom footprint
Buffer Concentrates
791 m2 manufacturing cleanroom
18% cleanroom footprint
2,000 L bioreactor
3,730 m2 facility
Buffer concentrates shrink new facility footprint or increase capacity
of existing facilities
$315
$180
$208
$81
$63
$55
$45 $40
$33
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
MIH RTU CONC MIH RTU CONC MIH RTU CONC
buffercost($/L)
13
200 L Bioreactor Facility, 12 Runs per Year
Ready to Use Buffers Reduce Costs up to 43% over Made-in-House Buffers
Ready to use buffers save 10 to 43% over made in house buffers
Buffer concentrates are the lowest cost option for 5 & 10 g/L scenarios
1 g/L 5 g/L 10 g/L
$11
$13
$11
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
MIH RTU CONC
buffercost($/L)
14
2,000 L Bioreactor Facility, 12 Runs per Year
Buffer Concentrates Reduce Costs up to 16% over Made-in-House Buffers
Concentrates save 16% at 1 g/L titer and have similar cost to MIH at 5 & 10 g/L titer
Concentrates lower labor by 20% and CAPEX by 42% at 10 g/L
10 g/L
32,3%
20,3%
18,3%
2,1%
10,5%
5,2%
4,0%
7,3%
Cost Contribution for MIH 2000L 10 g/L
Annual Consumable Cost
Annual Raw Material Cost
Annual Labor Cost
Annual Warehousing Cost
Annual Incoming QC Cost
Annual Facility Expense
(depreciated) 30yrs
Annual CAPEX Expense
(depreciated) 10yrs
Annual Shipping Cost
4,9%
71,2%
14,0%
0,6%
0,7%
4,0%
2,3% 2,3%
Cost Contribution for CONC 2000L 10 g/L
Annual Consumable Cost
Annual Raw Material Cost
Annual Labor Cost
Annual Warehousing Cost
Annual Incoming QC Cost
Annual Facility Expense
(depreciated) 30yrs
Annual CAPEX Expense
(depreciated) 10yrs
Annual Shipping Cost
15
5 X 2,000 L Bioreactor Facility, 12 Runs per Year
Buffer Concentrates Reduce Labor and CAPEX by ≥50%
Buffers Concentrates and Made in House buffers similar cost up to 2.4 million L/yr
Concentrates reduce labor by 50% and CAPEX by 53% while increasing operator safety
33,3%
20,7%
21,2%
2,4%
6,3%
4,4%
3,6% 8,2%
Cost Contribution for MIH 5 X 2000L 5g/L
Annual Consumable Cost
Annual Raw Material Cost
Annual Labor Cost
Annual Warehousing Cost
Annual Incoming QC Cost
Annual Facility Expense
(depreciated) 30yrs
Annual CAPEX Expense
(depreciated) 10yrs
6,3%
74,7%
10,6%
0,7%
0,3%
3,6%
1,5%
2,3%
Cost Contribution for CONC 5 X 2000L 5g/L
Annual Consumable Cost
Annual Raw Material Cost
Annual Labor Cost
Annual Warehousing Cost
Annual Incoming QC Cost
Annual Facility Expense
(depreciated) 30yrs
Annual CAPEX Expense
(depreciated) 10yrs
$9
$10
$9
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
MIH RTU CONC
buffercost($/L)
5 g/L
16
All Facility Scales, 20 Runs per Year
Buffer Concentrates Cost Competitive at Consumption Rate of 4 million L/yr
$8
$10
$8
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
MIH RTU CONC
buffercost($/L)
Buffer Cost at 5 X 2,000L Bioreactor Scale
$13
$16
$13
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
MIH RTU CONC
buffercost($/L)
Buffer Cost at 2,000L Bioreactor Scale
$64
$50
$42
$-
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
MIH RTU CONC
buffercost($/L)
Buffer Costs at 200L Bioreactor Scale
5 g/L
5 g/L
5 g/L
Conclusions
Buffer Concentrates are cost competitive with
made in house buffers and:
• Reduce labor costs
• Reduce facility CAPEX and overhead
• Increase operator safety
Cost models can be customized to individual
process and facility
Topics
1 Buffer Preparation Overview
2 Preparation cost Models
3 Integrated Delivery & Management
4 Summary
17
BioContinuum™ Buffer Delivery Platform
Delivering Certainty in Buffer Preparation and Management in < 16 weeks
Buffer
Concentrates
Buffer
Dilution
System
Services &
Training
Mobius® Select
Assemblies
18
19
Facility Floor View
BioContinuum™ Buffer Delivery Platform
Process-Specific
Buffer
Concentrates
Buffer Dilution
SYSTEM
Single Use
assemblies and
Containers
Sterile Buffer Concentrates
Liquid production sites
Irvine
St. Louis
Singapore
Nantong (Opening soon)
20
Production Facility
imMEDIAte ADVANTAGE™
HTST
Sterile Buffer Concentrates
Our Sterile Liquid Capabilities at a glance
50 – 1,000 L batch size
Production according to ISO 9001:2008 and GMP conditions
Separate areas NAO / AO
Non-hazardous and hazardous materials
Configurable packaging
21
22
Customer-recommended concentrates
• Defined 19 most commonly used buffers in Mab
Processes
• Chromatography, TFF, dilution buffers
Maximum solubility (typically 10-30x) and stability in
Mobius assemblies characterized
Define design space in which buffers can be made, stored,
and delivered
 Sterile, concentrated stock solutions will be
configurable and user-defined.
Buffers Available as Concentrates
0.1M Acetate + 0.5 M NaCl, pH 5.5
0.1M Citrate, pH 5.4, pH 5.5
1.0 M Tris, pH 8.4, pH 8.5
0.1M Acetic Acid
0.05M Tris, 0.5M Arginine, pH 8.4, pH 8.5
0.1M Acetic Acid, pH 5.0
1- 2 M Citric Acid
1-2 M Phosphoric Acid
20% Ethanol
50-100 mM acetic acid, pH 3.2
50-100 mM citric acid, pH 3.2
50-100 mM glycine, pH 3.2
50mM Bis-Tris, pH 7
50mM MES, pH 6-7
50mM Phosphate pH 7.4
Sterile Buffer Concentrates
BPOG Buffer Workstream defined Design Space for Configurable Concentrates
23
Control Strategies
pH control
 Sensor Accuracy, ≥ 1%
 In addition:
o Tendency to drift
o Memory effect often observed
o Frequent calibration required
Conductivity control
 Sensor Accuracy, ≥ 1%
 In addition:
o Frequent calibration required
Highest accuracy in buffer dilution with Millipore/YMC buffer dilution systems
Volumetric flow control delivers accuracy and precision for consistent
buffer preparation
24
Control Strategies
pH control
 Sensor Accuracy, ≥ 1%
 In addition:
o Tendency to drift
o Memory effect often observed
o Frequent calibration required
Conductivity control
 Sensor Accuracy, ≥ 1%
 In addition:
o Frequent calibration required
Volumetric Flow Control
Flow meters and pumps are more accurate and
stable than pH or conductivity detectors
17 and 33 LPM systems
Lewa Ecodos® pump with Intellidrive®
− Volume Flow Control Accuracy <1.0%
− Highest accuracy in dilution at 20:1 ratio
or greater
Highest accuracy in buffer dilution with MilliporeSigma/YMC buffer dilution systems
Volumetric flow control delivers accuracy and precision for consistent
buffer preparation
Accurate buffer concentrate preparation and dilution negates need for pH
or conductivity conditioning
Mobius® Select Assemblies
Configurable Assemblies Provide Flexibility and Delivery in 8 weeks
Enhanced supply transparency
and security
 Quality and supply agreements
 Monitored safety stock levels with
continuous replenishment
 Less materials of construction and raw
material changes
Reduces consumable
management burden and costs
 Drives standardization and
harmonization of part numbers
 Reduces change notifications
 Eliminates need for extractable testing
- savings of $125K+
Faster implementation
 Assembly drawing in < 24hrs
 Prototype in ≤ 4wks
 Documentation available via Emprove®
Dossiers
 Assembly in ≤ 6wks
Flexibility
 Unlimited configurable designs with
400 pre-qualified components
Enhanced quality
 Prequalified library of
components
 Automated manufacture
25
Mobius® Select
Topics
1 Buffer Preparation Overview
2 Preparation cost Models
3 Integrated Delivery & Management
4 Summary
26
Summary
Buffer concentrates offer significant footprint and
cost reduction
Volumetric control for dilution is the most accurate
preparation method
BioContinuum™ Buffer Delivery Platform executes
preparation and management with certainty
2727
1
2
3
28
shannon.ryan@milliporesigma.com
Shannon Ryan
29
The vibrant M, BioContinuum, imMEDIAte ADVANTAGE, Mobius, are trademarks of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Detailed
information on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources.
© 2019 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

More Related Content

PDF
How to reach High Plasma Protein Concentration with Single-Pass TFF
PDF
Webinar: How to Develop a Regulatory-compliant Continued Process Verificatio...
PPT
Custom Affinity Chromatography for Vaccine Purification: A New PD Paradigm
PPTX
Implementing a Fully Single-Use, Integrated mAb Biosimilars Purification Plat...
PDF
Process Development for Continuous Flow-Through Polishing Purification for mA...
PDF
Webinar: Evaluating Viral Clearance for Continuous Processes
PDF
Hot melt extrusion with PVA: A new opportunity for challenging APIs
PDF
Media and Process Development for Seed Train Intensification
How to reach High Plasma Protein Concentration with Single-Pass TFF
Webinar: How to Develop a Regulatory-compliant Continued Process Verificatio...
Custom Affinity Chromatography for Vaccine Purification: A New PD Paradigm
Implementing a Fully Single-Use, Integrated mAb Biosimilars Purification Plat...
Process Development for Continuous Flow-Through Polishing Purification for mA...
Webinar: Evaluating Viral Clearance for Continuous Processes
Hot melt extrusion with PVA: A new opportunity for challenging APIs
Media and Process Development for Seed Train Intensification

What's hot (15)

PDF
Using Single-use Technology to Overcome the Challenges of ADC Processing
PDF
An Efficient and cGMP-friendly Solution to Diafiltration for Intensified or C...
PDF
Membrane Chromatography Solutions for Single-Use, Intensified mAb Purification
PDF
Total cost of ownership – how the choice of excipients makes your economics
PPTX
Bioburden control: Strategies to address bioburden control in downstream proc...
PDF
A Cost Analysis and Evaluation of Perfused Seed Train Scenarios Through Proce...
PDF
Extractables profiles for chromatography resins - adapted approach of upcomin...
PDF
Process development guidance for AAV and lentivirus manufacturing based on co...
PDF
Process Intensification for future bioprocessing
PDF
Webinar: Novel Perfusion Filter and Controller for N-1 Application
PDF
Complete single-use ADC technology from development through scale-up
PDF
Evaluation of Established & New Viral Filters for a Monoclonal Antibody Platf...
PPTX
Process Development for Cell Therapy and Viral Gene Therapy
PDF
Key to Successful Formulation Development for Lipid Based RNA Delivery and Va...
PDF
Straight to the Point: Reaching Clinical Stage Development with a CHOZN® Cell...
Using Single-use Technology to Overcome the Challenges of ADC Processing
An Efficient and cGMP-friendly Solution to Diafiltration for Intensified or C...
Membrane Chromatography Solutions for Single-Use, Intensified mAb Purification
Total cost of ownership – how the choice of excipients makes your economics
Bioburden control: Strategies to address bioburden control in downstream proc...
A Cost Analysis and Evaluation of Perfused Seed Train Scenarios Through Proce...
Extractables profiles for chromatography resins - adapted approach of upcomin...
Process development guidance for AAV and lentivirus manufacturing based on co...
Process Intensification for future bioprocessing
Webinar: Novel Perfusion Filter and Controller for N-1 Application
Complete single-use ADC technology from development through scale-up
Evaluation of Established & New Viral Filters for a Monoclonal Antibody Platf...
Process Development for Cell Therapy and Viral Gene Therapy
Key to Successful Formulation Development for Lipid Based RNA Delivery and Va...
Straight to the Point: Reaching Clinical Stage Development with a CHOZN® Cell...
Ad

Similar to Facility Intensification and Cost Reduction using an Integrated Buffer Delivery Platform (20)

PDF
An Efficient and cGMP-friendly Solution to Diafiltration for Intensified or C...
PDF
Complete single-use ADC technology from development through scale-up
PDF
Webinar: Novel Perfusion Filter and Controller for N-1 Application
PPT
Lentikats Biotechnology
PPTX
Phytorid Wastewater Treatment Technology- Decentralised & Ecosystem Based ...
PDF
The Biocontinuum™ Seed Train Platform
PDF
The Biocontinuum™ Seed Train Platform
PPT
Automated release of water using on line TOC analysis and FDA risk-based cGMP...
PDF
Technology Trends in Bioprocessing Purification
PDF
Technology Trends in Bioprocessing Purification
PDF
BioBase4SME slides webinar Technical services
PPTX
Implementing a Fully Single-Use, Integrated mAb Biosimilars Purification Plat...
PDF
Handling High Titer Processes and Strategies for DSP Facility Fit | KBI Biop...
PPTX
Sequential batch reactor (SBR)
PPTX
Thesis & design presentation
PPT
How to increase crude throughput in desalter applications
PPT
Environmentally friendly techniques in Textiles
PDF
High Productivity Membrane Chromatography: Enabling the Next Generation Biopr...
PDF
High Productivity Membrane Chromatography: Enabling the Next Generation Biopr...
PPT
GPO Application Dataset
An Efficient and cGMP-friendly Solution to Diafiltration for Intensified or C...
Complete single-use ADC technology from development through scale-up
Webinar: Novel Perfusion Filter and Controller for N-1 Application
Lentikats Biotechnology
Phytorid Wastewater Treatment Technology- Decentralised & Ecosystem Based ...
The Biocontinuum™ Seed Train Platform
The Biocontinuum™ Seed Train Platform
Automated release of water using on line TOC analysis and FDA risk-based cGMP...
Technology Trends in Bioprocessing Purification
Technology Trends in Bioprocessing Purification
BioBase4SME slides webinar Technical services
Implementing a Fully Single-Use, Integrated mAb Biosimilars Purification Plat...
Handling High Titer Processes and Strategies for DSP Facility Fit | KBI Biop...
Sequential batch reactor (SBR)
Thesis & design presentation
How to increase crude throughput in desalter applications
Environmentally friendly techniques in Textiles
High Productivity Membrane Chromatography: Enabling the Next Generation Biopr...
High Productivity Membrane Chromatography: Enabling the Next Generation Biopr...
GPO Application Dataset
Ad

More from Merck Life Sciences (20)

PDF
Launch of our new Titanium Dioxide Alternative
PDF
The Viscosity Reduction Platform: Viscosity-reducing excipients for improveme...
PDF
Use of Excipients in Downstream Processing to Improve Protein Purification
PDF
Exploring the protein stabilizing capability of surfactants against agitation...
PDF
The Viscosity Reduction Platform: Viscosity Reducing Excipients for Protein F...
PDF
Characterization of monoclonal antibodies and Antibody drug conjugates by Sur...
PDF
The Role of BioPhorum Extractables Data in the Effective Adoption of Single-U...
PDF
The Future of Pharma- and Biopharmaceutical Audits
PDF
Moving your Gene Therapy from R&D to IND: How to navigate the Regulatory Land...
PDF
Identity testing by NGS as a means of risk mitigation for viral gene therapies
PDF
Latest advancements of melt based 3D printing technologies for oral drug deli...
PDF
CAR-T Manufacturing Innovations that Work - Automating Low Volume Processes a...
PDF
Viral safety of biologics: What's changing with the ICH Q5A revision?
PDF
Improve Operational Efficiency by Over 30% with Product, Process, & Systems A...
PDF
Insights from a Global Collaboration Accelerating Vaccine Development with an...
PDF
Risk-Based Qualification of X-Ray Sterilization for Single-Use Systems
PDF
Rapid replication competent adenovirus (rRCA) detection: Accelerate your lot ...
PDF
The High Intensity Sweeteners Neotame and Sucralose: 2 Ways to ace the Patien...
PDF
The Developability Classification System (DCS): Enabling an Optimized Approac...
PDF
How to Accelerate and Enhance ADC Therapies
Launch of our new Titanium Dioxide Alternative
The Viscosity Reduction Platform: Viscosity-reducing excipients for improveme...
Use of Excipients in Downstream Processing to Improve Protein Purification
Exploring the protein stabilizing capability of surfactants against agitation...
The Viscosity Reduction Platform: Viscosity Reducing Excipients for Protein F...
Characterization of monoclonal antibodies and Antibody drug conjugates by Sur...
The Role of BioPhorum Extractables Data in the Effective Adoption of Single-U...
The Future of Pharma- and Biopharmaceutical Audits
Moving your Gene Therapy from R&D to IND: How to navigate the Regulatory Land...
Identity testing by NGS as a means of risk mitigation for viral gene therapies
Latest advancements of melt based 3D printing technologies for oral drug deli...
CAR-T Manufacturing Innovations that Work - Automating Low Volume Processes a...
Viral safety of biologics: What's changing with the ICH Q5A revision?
Improve Operational Efficiency by Over 30% with Product, Process, & Systems A...
Insights from a Global Collaboration Accelerating Vaccine Development with an...
Risk-Based Qualification of X-Ray Sterilization for Single-Use Systems
Rapid replication competent adenovirus (rRCA) detection: Accelerate your lot ...
The High Intensity Sweeteners Neotame and Sucralose: 2 Ways to ace the Patien...
The Developability Classification System (DCS): Enabling an Optimized Approac...
How to Accelerate and Enhance ADC Therapies

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
Pyramid Points Lab Values Power Point(11).ppt
PDF
MINERAL & VITAMIN CHARTS fggfdtujhfd.pdf
PPTX
PE and Health 7 Quarter 3 Lesson 1 Day 3,4 and 5.pptx
PPT
Adrenergic drugs (sympathomimetics ).ppt
PPTX
Galactosemia pathophysiology, clinical features, investigation and treatment ...
PDF
Dr Masood Ahmed Expertise And Sucess Story
PPTX
community services team project 2(4).pptx
PPTX
Bronchial_Asthma_in_acute_exacerbation_.pptx
PPTX
Current Treatment Of Heart Failure By Dr Masood Ahmed
PPTX
CBT FOR OCD TREATMENT WITHOUT MEDICATION
PDF
Structure Composition and Mechanical Properties of Australian O.pdf
PPTX
General Pharmacology by Nandini Ratne, Nagpur College of Pharmacy, Hingna Roa...
PPTX
Basics of pharmacology (Pharmacology I).pptx
PDF
Assessment of Complications in Patients Maltreated with Fixed Self Cure Acryl...
PPTX
Importance of Immediate Response (1).pptx
PPTX
1. Drug Distribution System.pptt b pharmacy
DOCX
Copies if quanti.docxsegdfhfkhjhlkjlj,klkj
PPTX
AI_in_Pharmaceutical_Technology_Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Trichuris trichiura infection
PPTX
Rheumatic heart diseases with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Pyramid Points Lab Values Power Point(11).ppt
MINERAL & VITAMIN CHARTS fggfdtujhfd.pdf
PE and Health 7 Quarter 3 Lesson 1 Day 3,4 and 5.pptx
Adrenergic drugs (sympathomimetics ).ppt
Galactosemia pathophysiology, clinical features, investigation and treatment ...
Dr Masood Ahmed Expertise And Sucess Story
community services team project 2(4).pptx
Bronchial_Asthma_in_acute_exacerbation_.pptx
Current Treatment Of Heart Failure By Dr Masood Ahmed
CBT FOR OCD TREATMENT WITHOUT MEDICATION
Structure Composition and Mechanical Properties of Australian O.pdf
General Pharmacology by Nandini Ratne, Nagpur College of Pharmacy, Hingna Roa...
Basics of pharmacology (Pharmacology I).pptx
Assessment of Complications in Patients Maltreated with Fixed Self Cure Acryl...
Importance of Immediate Response (1).pptx
1. Drug Distribution System.pptt b pharmacy
Copies if quanti.docxsegdfhfkhjhlkjlj,klkj
AI_in_Pharmaceutical_Technology_Presentation.pptx
Trichuris trichiura infection
Rheumatic heart diseases with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Facility Intensification and Cost Reduction using an Integrated Buffer Delivery Platform

  • 1. Integrated Buffer Delivery and Management for Facility Intensification and Cost Reduction The BioContinuum™ Platform 1 Shannon J. Ryan, Ph.D. 2 May 2019
  • 2. The life science business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany operates as MilliporeSigma in the U.S. and Canada.
  • 3. Speed Reduce new facility build times by 70%. Compress production lead time by 80%. Quality 10X robustness. 90% reduction in cost of poor quality. Flexibility Reduce product change-over time by 90%. Cost 90% reduction in cost to manufacture and CAPEX. Business Drivers Market Growth Uncertainty New Product Classes Cost Pressure Market Trends Market Trends, Business Drivers and Key Enablers to Drive Next Generation BioProcessing: Process Intensification Process Analytics Software & Automation Key Enablers Single Use 3
  • 4. Next Generation Processing: Evolutionary Journey in mAb Manufacturing End state Today Near-term Mid-term Process Batch Intensified Connected Continuous Format Stainless Hybrid Single Use SU/Closed 4 Our Mission Developing technologies, applications and expertise which enable biotherapeutic manufacturers to confidently enter the era of next generation processing.
  • 5. Topics 1 Buffer Preparation Overview 2 Preparation cost Models 3 Integrated Delivery & Management 4 Summary 5
  • 6. Buffer preparation is an essential function but does not add value 1 Buffer Prep Is a Core Operation Drives plant schedule and capacity 2 Critical, But not Value-Added Imbalance between resources & footprint required and simplicity of buffer prep On-site buffer Preparation Dilution of Buffer Concentrates Buffer Conditioning or blending Ready-t0-use buffers Requirements: 5-10 L buffer per L bioreactor 15 Unique buffers Critical attributes for process performance 6
  • 7. 7 Challenges in Buffer Preparation require new approaches Problem Statement: How do we provide the right buffer at the right time and specifications while minimizing our labor and footprint? On-site buffer Preparation Buffer Conditioning or blending Ready-t0-use buffers Traditional Buffer Preparation Pain Points : 1. Large amount of classified floor space 2. Significant Labor Requirements 3. Buffer volumes that grow linearly with Bioreactor Titer 4. Quality Control testing 5. Excess Capacity to account for preparation error Dilution of Buffer Concentrates
  • 8. 8 Significant Desire to Move toward Outsourced Buffer Preparation 87 44 28 19 6 9 100100 Today 3 4 5 years from now MEAN adoption Ready to use buffers Automated buffer conditioning system Dilution of buffer concentrates Standard mix vessel 70 34 43 20 30 29 28 18 10 8 10 100 0 100 Clinical (n=8) Commercial (n=15) Preclinical (n=4) 100 5 years expectation breakdown by manufacturing scale Intensified buffer preparation will increase from 7% to 47% by 2023
  • 9. Topics 1 Buffer Preparation Overview 2 Preparation cost Models 3 Integrated Delivery & Management 4 Summary 9
  • 10. 10 Made In House (MIH) • Buffer chemicals hydrated in mix tanks, filtered, and QC-released prior to use • Single Use mixers and hold vessels used up to 2,000 L; SS vessels at > 2,000L Ready to Use (RTU) • Buffers shipped to site at ready to use concentration. • Transported in single use vessels up to 1,000 L • QC-released prior to use Buffer Concentrates (CONC) • Buffer concentrates (10x for cost models) shipped to site • QC-released prior to use • Concentrates diluted into hold vessels using automated system 3 Buffer Preparation Methods for Cost Models
  • 11. 11 MAb Facility Considerations for Buffer Preparation Scenarios Design Variables Values Modeled Facility Scale 200 L, 2000 L, & 5 X 2000 L Fed-batch Bioreactors MAb Titer 1 g/L, 5 g/L, and 10 g/L Run Rate 12 & 20 batches/year
  • 12. 12 Impact of Buffer Preparation Method on Facility Design 18% Reduction in Cleanroom Area Utilizing Buffer Concentrates On-Site Buffer Preparation 970 m2 manufacturing cleanroom Ready to Use Buffers 914 m2 manufacturing cleanroom 6% cleanroom footprint Buffer Concentrates 791 m2 manufacturing cleanroom 18% cleanroom footprint 2,000 L bioreactor 3,730 m2 facility Buffer concentrates shrink new facility footprint or increase capacity of existing facilities
  • 13. $315 $180 $208 $81 $63 $55 $45 $40 $33 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 MIH RTU CONC MIH RTU CONC MIH RTU CONC buffercost($/L) 13 200 L Bioreactor Facility, 12 Runs per Year Ready to Use Buffers Reduce Costs up to 43% over Made-in-House Buffers Ready to use buffers save 10 to 43% over made in house buffers Buffer concentrates are the lowest cost option for 5 & 10 g/L scenarios 1 g/L 5 g/L 10 g/L
  • 14. $11 $13 $11 $- $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 MIH RTU CONC buffercost($/L) 14 2,000 L Bioreactor Facility, 12 Runs per Year Buffer Concentrates Reduce Costs up to 16% over Made-in-House Buffers Concentrates save 16% at 1 g/L titer and have similar cost to MIH at 5 & 10 g/L titer Concentrates lower labor by 20% and CAPEX by 42% at 10 g/L 10 g/L 32,3% 20,3% 18,3% 2,1% 10,5% 5,2% 4,0% 7,3% Cost Contribution for MIH 2000L 10 g/L Annual Consumable Cost Annual Raw Material Cost Annual Labor Cost Annual Warehousing Cost Annual Incoming QC Cost Annual Facility Expense (depreciated) 30yrs Annual CAPEX Expense (depreciated) 10yrs Annual Shipping Cost 4,9% 71,2% 14,0% 0,6% 0,7% 4,0% 2,3% 2,3% Cost Contribution for CONC 2000L 10 g/L Annual Consumable Cost Annual Raw Material Cost Annual Labor Cost Annual Warehousing Cost Annual Incoming QC Cost Annual Facility Expense (depreciated) 30yrs Annual CAPEX Expense (depreciated) 10yrs Annual Shipping Cost
  • 15. 15 5 X 2,000 L Bioreactor Facility, 12 Runs per Year Buffer Concentrates Reduce Labor and CAPEX by ≥50% Buffers Concentrates and Made in House buffers similar cost up to 2.4 million L/yr Concentrates reduce labor by 50% and CAPEX by 53% while increasing operator safety 33,3% 20,7% 21,2% 2,4% 6,3% 4,4% 3,6% 8,2% Cost Contribution for MIH 5 X 2000L 5g/L Annual Consumable Cost Annual Raw Material Cost Annual Labor Cost Annual Warehousing Cost Annual Incoming QC Cost Annual Facility Expense (depreciated) 30yrs Annual CAPEX Expense (depreciated) 10yrs 6,3% 74,7% 10,6% 0,7% 0,3% 3,6% 1,5% 2,3% Cost Contribution for CONC 5 X 2000L 5g/L Annual Consumable Cost Annual Raw Material Cost Annual Labor Cost Annual Warehousing Cost Annual Incoming QC Cost Annual Facility Expense (depreciated) 30yrs Annual CAPEX Expense (depreciated) 10yrs $9 $10 $9 $- $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 MIH RTU CONC buffercost($/L) 5 g/L
  • 16. 16 All Facility Scales, 20 Runs per Year Buffer Concentrates Cost Competitive at Consumption Rate of 4 million L/yr $8 $10 $8 $- $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 MIH RTU CONC buffercost($/L) Buffer Cost at 5 X 2,000L Bioreactor Scale $13 $16 $13 $- $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $18 MIH RTU CONC buffercost($/L) Buffer Cost at 2,000L Bioreactor Scale $64 $50 $42 $- $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 MIH RTU CONC buffercost($/L) Buffer Costs at 200L Bioreactor Scale 5 g/L 5 g/L 5 g/L Conclusions Buffer Concentrates are cost competitive with made in house buffers and: • Reduce labor costs • Reduce facility CAPEX and overhead • Increase operator safety Cost models can be customized to individual process and facility
  • 17. Topics 1 Buffer Preparation Overview 2 Preparation cost Models 3 Integrated Delivery & Management 4 Summary 17
  • 18. BioContinuum™ Buffer Delivery Platform Delivering Certainty in Buffer Preparation and Management in < 16 weeks Buffer Concentrates Buffer Dilution System Services & Training Mobius® Select Assemblies 18
  • 19. 19 Facility Floor View BioContinuum™ Buffer Delivery Platform Process-Specific Buffer Concentrates Buffer Dilution SYSTEM Single Use assemblies and Containers
  • 20. Sterile Buffer Concentrates Liquid production sites Irvine St. Louis Singapore Nantong (Opening soon) 20 Production Facility imMEDIAte ADVANTAGE™ HTST
  • 21. Sterile Buffer Concentrates Our Sterile Liquid Capabilities at a glance 50 – 1,000 L batch size Production according to ISO 9001:2008 and GMP conditions Separate areas NAO / AO Non-hazardous and hazardous materials Configurable packaging 21
  • 22. 22 Customer-recommended concentrates • Defined 19 most commonly used buffers in Mab Processes • Chromatography, TFF, dilution buffers Maximum solubility (typically 10-30x) and stability in Mobius assemblies characterized Define design space in which buffers can be made, stored, and delivered  Sterile, concentrated stock solutions will be configurable and user-defined. Buffers Available as Concentrates 0.1M Acetate + 0.5 M NaCl, pH 5.5 0.1M Citrate, pH 5.4, pH 5.5 1.0 M Tris, pH 8.4, pH 8.5 0.1M Acetic Acid 0.05M Tris, 0.5M Arginine, pH 8.4, pH 8.5 0.1M Acetic Acid, pH 5.0 1- 2 M Citric Acid 1-2 M Phosphoric Acid 20% Ethanol 50-100 mM acetic acid, pH 3.2 50-100 mM citric acid, pH 3.2 50-100 mM glycine, pH 3.2 50mM Bis-Tris, pH 7 50mM MES, pH 6-7 50mM Phosphate pH 7.4 Sterile Buffer Concentrates BPOG Buffer Workstream defined Design Space for Configurable Concentrates
  • 23. 23 Control Strategies pH control  Sensor Accuracy, ≥ 1%  In addition: o Tendency to drift o Memory effect often observed o Frequent calibration required Conductivity control  Sensor Accuracy, ≥ 1%  In addition: o Frequent calibration required Highest accuracy in buffer dilution with Millipore/YMC buffer dilution systems Volumetric flow control delivers accuracy and precision for consistent buffer preparation
  • 24. 24 Control Strategies pH control  Sensor Accuracy, ≥ 1%  In addition: o Tendency to drift o Memory effect often observed o Frequent calibration required Conductivity control  Sensor Accuracy, ≥ 1%  In addition: o Frequent calibration required Volumetric Flow Control Flow meters and pumps are more accurate and stable than pH or conductivity detectors 17 and 33 LPM systems Lewa Ecodos® pump with Intellidrive® − Volume Flow Control Accuracy <1.0% − Highest accuracy in dilution at 20:1 ratio or greater Highest accuracy in buffer dilution with MilliporeSigma/YMC buffer dilution systems Volumetric flow control delivers accuracy and precision for consistent buffer preparation Accurate buffer concentrate preparation and dilution negates need for pH or conductivity conditioning
  • 25. Mobius® Select Assemblies Configurable Assemblies Provide Flexibility and Delivery in 8 weeks Enhanced supply transparency and security  Quality and supply agreements  Monitored safety stock levels with continuous replenishment  Less materials of construction and raw material changes Reduces consumable management burden and costs  Drives standardization and harmonization of part numbers  Reduces change notifications  Eliminates need for extractable testing - savings of $125K+ Faster implementation  Assembly drawing in < 24hrs  Prototype in ≤ 4wks  Documentation available via Emprove® Dossiers  Assembly in ≤ 6wks Flexibility  Unlimited configurable designs with 400 pre-qualified components Enhanced quality  Prequalified library of components  Automated manufacture 25 Mobius® Select
  • 26. Topics 1 Buffer Preparation Overview 2 Preparation cost Models 3 Integrated Delivery & Management 4 Summary 26
  • 27. Summary Buffer concentrates offer significant footprint and cost reduction Volumetric control for dilution is the most accurate preparation method BioContinuum™ Buffer Delivery Platform executes preparation and management with certainty 2727 1 2 3
  • 28. 28
  • 29. shannon.ryan@milliporesigma.com Shannon Ryan 29 The vibrant M, BioContinuum, imMEDIAte ADVANTAGE, Mobius, are trademarks of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Detailed information on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources. © 2019 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.