Enabling the Data Revolution

Enabling
the Data Revolution
An International Open Data Roadmap
CONFERENCE REPORT

Hundreds of
participants attended
the unConference
Launch of the
much discussed
Humanitarian
Exchange Language
(HXL)
Launch of a
consultation on an
International Open
Data Charter
The Open Parliaments
Network was officially
launched with a pre-
event and panels in
the main conference
Various action
sessions devoted
to discussing
standardization,
and the launch of
the Joined Up Data
Alliance right after the
conference
Inaugural meeting
of the Open Data
Research Symposium
discussed over 30
new research papers
Data standards and
technology groups
gathered for in-depth
shared learning, with
pre-event workshops
on Open Contracting,
CKAN and Open
Corporates
15 different thematic
impact panels
presenting case
studies from around
the world
Enabling the Data Revolution
OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT

A new working paper
from the Global Open
Data for Agriculture
and Nutrition (GODAN)
initiative supporting
in-depth debate on
a problem-centred
approach to open data
Launch of the
GovLab Network of
Innovators, signing up
over 100 conference
delegates, and a
meeting of the Open
Data Leadership
Network
The conference
closed with
presentations of draft
action roadmap
Panels on Data +
Public Finance were
supported by the
release of a new
visualization template
for understanding
the follow the money
debate
The Open
Government
Partnership launched
the OGP Explorer
Launch of the Open
Data for Development
Fund
Launch of the Open
Data Impact Map
The Open Data
Institute launched a
conversation on the
ownership of data
infrastructures
Announcement of the
fourth International
Open Data Conference
to be held in Madrid,
Spain in October 2016
OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT

44
Structure
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Hosts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1. Introduction: Enabling the Data Revolution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2. Data Plus: Building on Impact. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Agriculture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Elections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Extractives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Fiscal Transparency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Health. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Open Cities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Media and Culture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Indigenous People. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Public Money . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Public Sector Accountability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Parliaments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3. The Road Ahead: Understanding the Big Picture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Principles for the Revolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Building an Open Data Infrastructure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
An Engine of Innovation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Open Data for All. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Monitoring and Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4. Next Steps: An Action Plan for International Collaboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Annexe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Acknowledgements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

55
Summary
The global open data community is maturing rapidly:
The adoption of the G8 Open Data Charter and discussions about a more inclu-
sive international Open Data Charter show the growing political commitment to
unlocking the supply of data.
The UN Independent Expert Advisory Group on a Data Revolution for Sustain-
able Development1
, and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda2
have highlighted the
key role of open data in the post 2015 agenda.
The growing availability of data is reducing barriers for entrepreneurship and inno-
vation around the world. Innovative citizen-centered solutions are driving a substan-
tial transformation in sectors such as health, education, transport, and many more.
More than 1000 participants from 56 different countries took part in the 3rd
Inter-
national Open Data Conference (IODC) in Ottawa from May 28-29, 2015. Hosted by
the Government of Canada, the International Development Research Centre, and
the World Bank, IODC brought together open data experts to understand the global
impact of open data, coordinate action, and share best practices.
Titled “Enabling the Data Revolution”, the conference was designed as a platform
to discuss a roadmap for the international open data community. In person and
online, the participants produced 200+ presentations, 20,000+ tweets, 100+ blog
posts, and 33+ hours of videos. This was preceded by many pre-events co-hosted
by the Open Data for Development program (OD4D), which included the first Open
Data Leaders Summit, Open Data Research Symposium, Open Data Unconference,
Connecting Standards Day, and many more.
This report is supported by a full online archive of conference content at www.open-
datacon.org.
1 http://undatarevolution.org
2 http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2015/07/addis-ababa-action-agenda-ban/

66
A VISION OF THE FUTURE: BUILDING ON WHAT WORKS
Open data leaders from around the world showcased how open data is changing spe-
cific sectors, from health and education, to fiscal governance and urban develop-
ment. Open data is a cross-cutting issue, offering a unique approach to harness the
full power of data in many different sectors. On its own, data is only a foundation for
impact. When data availability is combined with skilled civic entrepreneurs and the
right supporting environment, open data can enable the kind of innovations that
are leading a social, political, and economic revolution.
DEBATING OPEN DATA: UNDERSTANDING THE BIG PICTURE
Openness is vital if we are to harness the opportunities for data innovation that are
unlocked when data crosses geographic and sectoral boundaries. Considering the
contribution of open data to sustainable development around the world, the con-
ference focused on key themes including: common principles for open data; the
use of open data to solve practical problems; the creation of robust and reliable
open data infrastructures; and the development of an open data landscape that is
inclusive and accessible to all.
ACTION PLAN: HARNESSING OPEN DATA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Drawing on conference panels, pre-events, and a series of focused “action” ses-
sions at the conference, five priority areas have been identified, providing an action
plan for the international open data community. These five areas are:
Deliver shared principles for open data
Develop and adopt good practices and open standards for data publication
Build capacity to produce and use open data effectively
Strengthen open data innovation networks
Adopt common measurement and evaluation tools
The full report provides more detail on key steps to take steps forward in each of
these areas.

77
OPEN DATA FOR DEVELOPMENT (OD4D)
The OD4D program prepared this conference report as a contribution to the open
data community. OD4D seeks to scale open data solutions that have been proven to
work in the developing world. The OD4D network of implementing agencies include
the Web Foundation, Open Data Institute, Open Knowledge, and leading regional
and local partners committed to the creation of locally-driven and sustainable open
data ecosystems in developing countries. The program is hosted at the International
Development Research Centre (IDRC), and co-funded by the World Bank, United
Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID), and Canada’s Department
of Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development (DFATD). OD4D is one of Government of
Canada’s commitments set out in Canada’s Action Plan on Open Government 2014-
2016. The results of IODC 2015 outlined in this report will inform OD4D’s future priorities.
CONFERENCE HOSTS

Conference
in Numbers
Government 354 NGO 164
Private Sector 98
Academic 68
Independent 49
Multilateral Agency 38
Student 23
Other 32
Media 3
Atendees Speakers1000+ 205
Fringe Events29
Tweets19.8K
8+Million
Reached
34% 66%

Conference Participants
Oceania
United States
Canada
Europe
Latin America and Caribbean
Asia
Africa
Not Specified
6
145
472
125
81
53
53
20
Oceania
United States
Canada
Europe
Latin America and Caribbean
Asia
Africa
6
1%
145
472
15%
49%
125
13%
81
9%
53
6%
53
6%

INTRODUCTION
Enabling
the Data Revolution

1111
INTRODUCTION
New technologies are leading to an exponential increase in the
volume and types of data available, creating unprecedented
possibilities for informing and transforming society and protecting
the environment. Governments, companies, researchers and citizen
groups are in a ferment of experimentation, innovation and adaptation
to the new world of data, a world in which data are bigger, faster and
more detailed than ever before.
A World that Counts UN Data Revolution Report, 20143
Data is powerful. From national statistics that measure progress towards develop-
ment goals, to in-depth data on public spending, decision-makers are using data
every day to determine policy and to direct the allocation of public resources. Data
can be used to detect corruption and to generate and test new ideas to address per-
sistent challenges; many of the most competitive businesses gain their edge by col-
lecting and analyzing vast quantities of data.
3 See: http://www.undatarevolution.org/report/

1212
It is because of the power that comes from data that the case for open data is so vital.
Open data is data that is made available for anyone to access, use, and share. Instead
of increasing information asymmetry—where a few organizations and institutions
keep public data locked up—with open data the groundwork is laid for all citizens
to get involved in shaping policy. With open data, organizations and individuals
can spend time on collaborative problem solving, rather than negotiating access to
datasets. With open data, innovation, insights, and new business models are made
possible, generating impacts that can scale. Further, with open data, when data is
treated as a part of a shared commons—co-created and co-maintained—duplicated
data collection activity can be eliminated, and the full return on investment from
managing datasets can be unlocked.
In May 2015, IODC brought together participants from 56 countries, each working on
open data in their own cultural, legal, and social contexts. Making effective use of
data in all these different settings around the world requires a variety of approaches
to build the capacity of users and intermediaries, recognizing differences in wide-
spread access to the technology, literacy, power, and capital that are commonly
needed to create social, political, and economic change with open data. As the data
revolution unfolds, and work to place openness at the centre of these transforma-
tion takes place, ongoing learning and global collaboration is much needed.
This report draws upon the many discussions that took place in Ottawa at IODC,
providing a summary of key topics and debates, and providing a shared vision of the
road ahead for the IODC community. It is divided into three main sections:
Building on Impact: drawing on over 70 impact presentations to share short stories
of how individuals and organizations are making a difference with data across the
world—showing the promise and the reality of open data, as well as identifying key
lessons for future projects.
Debating the Open Data Agenda: exploring critical themes from plenary sessions
and highlighting topics that future actions on open data must take into account
A Global Action Plan: consolidating discussions from IODC into an action plan, pro-
viding a foundation for ongoing collaboration across the open data community.
About this Report
Much of the text in this report is based on a synthesis of notes and blog posts put to-
gether by a team of rapporteurs at IODC, tasked with capturing the conference from
their own perspectives. Session video recordings, slides, tweets, and structured dis-
cussions, facilitated by a team of action anchors have also all informed the final
text. It is designed not as a single statement on open data, but rather as a curated

1313
record of discussions and debates, providing a snapshot of key issues and setting
out a path forward based on the visions, ideas, and agreements explored at IODC.
The print version of this report includes minimal references. However, you will find
a full online copy of the text hosted at ReadFold.com, where each section of the text
includes extensive hyperlinks and embedded media content, linking to video re-
cordings, tweets, blog post, slides, and other related content.
This report is a starting point for many more conversations about the role and impact
of open data around the world, and the action that must be taken to support the glob-
al movement for openness. At www.opendatacon.org you will find space to add your
comments and feedback on this report, taking forward the conversations it captures.
DEFINITIONS: DIFFERENT KINDS OF DATA
The data revolution draws upon many kinds of data. Not all data can be made into
open data, but through existing principles for official statistics we have templates
for balancing the demand for disaggregation of data with respect for privacy. Open
data approaches can help to put “transparency and openness”, “usability”, and
“independence” principles of official statistics into practice.
Closed Data is data that should not be shared. Private data about individuals falls into
this category. Many valuable datasets are derived from personal data. Whilst it may be
possible for aggregated and derived data to be shared, care must be taken to ensure
that individual rights to privacy and control over their own data are not undermined, and
that personal data is managed according to international best practices.
Shared Data is data that is made available to specific users, or for particular kinds
of reuse. For example, a telecom firm may give government or researchers access
to pseudonymized phone records to allow them to understand social trends, or
government may share aggregated health records with pharmaceutical firms to
support medical research.
Open Data is data that is provided for unrestricted reuse. This is usually achieved
through making it machine-readable, publishing it online, and providing a clear
statement that gives anyone permission to reuse it. Anyone can use open data for
anything, subject to other relevant laws and regulations relating to responsible data use.
The idea of “open by default” means that restrictions on the reuse of data should be
clearly justified. Unless good reasons are given for data to be closed, or under restricted
sharing arrangements, it should be accessible to all.

15
Building on Impact
The open data movement is still young, but it has
deep roots, drawing together communities from
many backgrounds, including digital innovation, ac-
cess to information, open source development, and
civic technology. Open data offers an approach to
problem solving that is relevant across many differ-
ent data communities, from education and agricul-
ture, to economic development and geo-data. IODC
included 14 impact sessions, each sharing stories of
work to open up, use, and create change with open
data in particular domains. This section is based on
highlights from those sessions, and focuses on how
open data can drive transformational changes across
many different sectors.
Data+Agriculture=CombattingHunger
By 2050 global food production will need to double
to combat hunger, malnutrition, and to meet the
needs of a growing population. In many areas of the
world, agriculture is already a data-driven business,
with precision farming making extensive use of
GPS, weather, and satellite data, alongside soil in-
formation and crop production statistics. Nutrition
datasets play an important role in both government
policy making and individual consumer decisions.
At the central government level in Mexico, smart-
er data analysis, enabled through collaboration
with university partners, is being used to better
target weather-related farm insurance payments.
Drawing on open data, the government can not
only improve policy, but can also communicate
the policy through interactive maps and visual-
izations. For the US Department of Agriculture,
open data offers an important opportunity to es-
cape a model where data is taken from the farm
level up to the federal level, without delivering
15

1616
accessible information back to disadvantaged farmers. Keeping data closer to
people who are in touch with both problems, and their potential solutions, is an
important part of an open data approach.
Openness is also empowering smallholder farmers in Jamaica. SlashRoots have been
working to use open data to improve information flows in the resource-constrained
Caribbean agriculture sector. With 200,000 farmers, and just 140 extension officers
to serve them, SlashRoots is building on top of open infrastructures and open data,
designing accessible digital services that can scale, and engaging outside experts in
open innovation processes to create more effective agricultural extension services.
A report from the Global Open Data for Agriculture and Nutrition (GODAN), launched
at IODC, made the case for ensuring that the growing range of data available in agri-
culture is provided as open data, and setting out the need to build on existing prac-
tice with a problem-centred approach to using data to create impact.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-agriculture/
http://www.godan.info/

Data + Education = Supporting Systemic Change
Open data can improve access to education, hold education providers accountable,
and drive management improvements.
The Open Schools Kenya project, funded by the Gates Foundation Grand Challenge,
brought together government data on schools with citizen-sourced data from the
Map Kibera team, working with community members to record information about
formal and informal schools and to present it on OpenStreetMap, informing citi-
zens about the educational opportunities in their local area.
In Colombia, Analítica Académica, a private enterprise, has worked with data from
universities to provide the higher education sector with information needed to im-
prove management and the overall education system.
In Nigeria, the civil society led Open Development Initiative has created a crowd-
sourcing platform to monitor the allocation and impact of funding to local schools,
combining open data and citizen feedback.
The Open Syllabus project is creating an open research dataset by scraping thousands of
university syllabi, offering a whole new way to look at the development of curriculum.
In each case, data was an enabler; but it was only with active intermediaries—wheth-
er public, private, or non-profit—that the impacts of open data could be realized.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-education/
Open Schools Kenya - openschoolskenya.org/

1818
Data + Elections = Enabling Engagement
Effective democracy demands informed citizens. Yet, far too often citizens cannot
obtain timely data on the candidates standing for elections, where their funding is
coming from, or how their existing elected representatives have been performing.
Even when data is collected in digital forms, it is frequently hosted on inaccessible
official websites that struggle to cope with spikes in traffic at election time, or that
languish unmaintained until election year. Open election data activists across the
world, from Argentina to Indonesia, have been working to change this, encouraging
a data-first approach to elections information.
Crowdsourced open candidate databases, like that generated by Democracy Club for
the May 2015 UK Election now appear as part of search results on Google, putting
improved information in front of potentially millions of voters. In Indonesia, the
API Pemilu project has put together an API of candidate information, powering over
40 apps available on desktop and mobile, and reaching over 7 million unique us-
ers. The same data is available for reuse by academics, start-ups, traditional media,
and new media platforms. Building on this data, innovative voter choice platforms
have attracted millions of users, using game-based approaches to engage citizens in
thinking about who to vote for.
For the API Pemilu project, the collaboration potential of open data was not just
about reaching civic hackers and developers. They have also worked with the Na-
tional Election Commission, helping them to take an open data first approach, and
working with elected representatives, establishing two-way communication with
constituents. Many other cases show how open data can open the door to new forms
of collaboration, helping connect governments with cutting-edge digital skills.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-elections/

19
Data+Environment=MobilizingKnowledge
Addressing climate change and environmental sus-
tainability is a knowledge-intensive enterprise. With
billions of data points from scientific research and mil-
lions of journal articles published in many different
languages over recent decades, organizing all that in-
formation, and getting it to the right people at the right
time requires both active intermediaries and shared
knowledge infrastructures. The Climate Knowledge
Brokers (CKB) group is building on the Renewable En-
ergy and Energy Efficiency Partnership’s (REEEP) mul-
tilingual climate thesaurus to tag and enrich content
from different document repositories, using a shared
Linked Open Data taxonomy. This helps to break down
the silos that keep information apart, building a stron-
ger open data ecosystem.
Creating strong ecosystems for open data requires
strong leadership and new approaches to allow
multi-stakeholder governance of data resources. In
the Caribbean, work on creating a sustainable marine
environment is engaging with actors throughout the
data value-chain—from fishermen to regional policy
makers—in order to build capacity to produce and work
with machine-readable data.
In Canada, with the rise of “Smart” electricity meters
(heading for 80% penetration in North America by the
end of the decade), work is taking place to ensure the re-
sulting data ecosystem balances privacy and openness.
This provides consumers with access to their own data
and the ability to selectively share that with third-par-
ties, or, with the data suitably anonymized, to share it as
open data for anyone to reuse.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-environment/
19

2020
Data + Extractives = Opening the Books
Transparency is central to challenging the “resource curse”, which has left many coun-
tries with substantial natural resource wealth among the poorest on the planet. Publish
What You Pay (PWYP) groups across the world have been experimenting with data to
understand the financial flows related to natural resources, and to find powerful stories
that can be used to secure accountability and to catalyze reforms. For example, in In-
donesia’s Southeast Sulawesi, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) have been using data
taken from Extractives Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) reports and comparing it
with data from local shipping records, estimating levels of lost revenue.
Over the coming year, a flood of new data on extractives revenue flows is antici-
pated, as new rules on project-level reporting come into force around the world.
This creates exciting new challenges ahead to equip the sector to make the most
of this data, while also ensuring that these new open data initiatives maintain the
strong tradition in the sector of projects driven by community needs and based on
the ethos of community ownership.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-extractives/
Data + Fiscal Transparency = Following the Money
On March 2, 2015, Nigerian NGO BudgIT helped to launch Ebola Fund Watch, using open
data to follow over $2.3 billion in Ebola intervention funds across Sierra Leone, Guinea,
Liberia, and Nigeria, gathering evidence on efficient use of committed funds. The proj-
ect builds on learning developed through prior BudgIT projects such as Tracka, moni-
toring capital projects in Nigeria, and Follow Flood Money, which brought together civil
society organizations with data experts to analyze how funding in response to the 2012
floods trickled down to communities and cities. The Ebola Fund Watch platform con-
nects data from donors with crowdsourced stories, and also produced an analytic report
to influence government institutions and guide policy reforms.

21
BudgIT are just one example of a growing community of individuals and organiza-
tions around the world engaged in activities to “Follow the Money”. Rather than
isolated “armchair auditors”, access to fiscal data is enabling groups to come to-
gether in focused exploration of gaps in public finances and spending. For example,
through the Public Knowledge Workshop in Israel, citizens investigated the lack of
funding for fire services, and from this became engaged in wider ongoing budget
analysis. Government officials are even using open budget data from their own ad-
ministrations to better understand, plan, and scrutinize policy.
Follow the money projects represent an ambitious program to rethink fiscal gov-
ernance; shifting from a process of periodic accounting when books are balanced
(and potentially corruption hidden), to a world of real-time data on financial flows,
where public money is visible to the public at all times. Delivering on this vision re-
quires substantial reforms to guarantee the quality of data. In the United States, the
DATA Act, a new federal law, moves in this direction by establishing technical stan-
dards for the exchange of data on public spending and contracts—working towards
a robust new infrastructure for transparency in public finances.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-fiscal-transparency/
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/data-public-money/
21

2222
Data + Health = Patient Choice
The time horizons involved in creating an impact with health open data can vary
widely. For research projects such as CARTaGENE, creating impact relies upon gath-
ering longitudinal data and getting permission from research subjects for the open
use of their data in future. Whereas for the creation of context-aware applications
that can inform people about current health issues such as flu trends, real-time in-
formation is vital; shifting health agency practice from the production of backwards
looking reports, to the direct publication of data from operational systems.
In Uruguay, where citizens can change their health provider once a year in February,
providing timely data involves an annual campaign. The Uruguay Ministry of Health
publishes reports on health provider performance, but prior to the launch of the “A
Tu Servicio” platform, which provides interactive rankings of health providers, less
than 1,000 people per year were downloading the data. Now the Ministry works with
the Latin America Open Data Initiative (ILDA) and Fundación Avina to provide a rich
interactive interface on top of open data and open source software, reaching 35,000
users last year, and contributing to an increase in the number of people changing
providers while also stimulating public discussion on health providers’ performance.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-health/
Data + Open Cities = Smart Citizens
By 2050 70% of the world’s population will live in urban centres. Keeping cities mov-
ing, promoting resilience, and securing democratic responsiveness in their direction
and day-to-day operation increasingly demands data. Open data secures space for
citizen-driven development and greater collaboration between officials and outside
actors. This can build open cities that adapt to meet the needs of their communities
and businesses, rather than imposing top-down structures and solutions.
Over 300 cities around the world are now implementing open data policies, with
the number growing every week. Although many local governments are still seek-
ing common approaches to measure the return on investment of open policies one
thing is clear: the objectives of open cities and the social and economic impacts that
they generate are many and varied across the world.
In the US, online real-estate firm Zillow consulted with a wide variety of stakehold-
ers and businesses to create a data standard for real estate data and then worked
with ten cities to convert their open data, enabling a range of commercial interme-
diaries to help constituents make better housing decisions.

2323
In Bahia Blanca, Argentina, the new mayor decided that an open city would be one
of his key platforms. The open city enabled a great deal of innovation, particular-
ly around solving environmental challenges due to petrochemical processing and
shipping by using sensors and other technologies.
The Open City project in Edmonton, Canada is drawing together thousands of data
points to create predictive models to help guide policy.
In Kathmandu, Nepal, open data has supported coordination in humanitarian response
and also increased accountability for humanitarian spending. For example, open data
has helped to track how much spending is actually reaching the government.
The World Council on City Data has established a framework for city indicators,
gathering 100 comparable data points from participating cities across the globe that
can be used for benchmarking.
Whether open data “empowers the already empowered”, or can truly redistribute
power and promote greater inclusion, it is likely to be shaped most visibly by action
at the city level in the coming years. These debates will undoubtedly continue at
the 4th
International Open Data Conference in Madrid, Spain in 2016, where there is
likely to be a particular emphasis on the smart city agenda.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/data-open-cities-part-1/
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-open-cities-part-2/
Data + Media and Culture = Informed Citizens
Data journalism has the potential to influence governments and instigate change
at the local, national, and global level. With the expansive reach of the Internet,
media narratives backed and informed by data have the ability to empower citizens
through accurate and easily-understandable news media stories. With increased
data literacy among journalists, media have the ability to provide citizens with es-
sential information needed to facilitate transparent, democratic processes.
In Kenya, an Internews investigation into allocation of a welfare fund has demon-
strated how finding the stories in data, and backing up news reports with data-driv-
en evidence, can instigate policy change. Reporting on a freeze in the distribution
of financial support for the elderly and disabled, traced back to a failure to agree
on a system for distribution of the money, and subsequent disappearance of many
funds, sparked government focus on the issue. Following this media attention, the

24
program was audited and reforms were implemented to develop a more efficient,
reliable, and transparent distribution process of funds.
As well as discovering stories in data, journalists are also using open data to enhance
fact-checking. Reflecting a model that has emerged in a number of countries, the Argen-
tinian non-profit Chequeado, has been established as an online fact-checking service
and media outlet for journalists in Latin America. It addition to providing accompanying
open data sets with all of the stories they publish, they have worked to assist other media
outlets in the Latin American region with fact-checking using open datasets.
In conflict-affected areas of Kenya, digital media projects are also building on a
fact-based activism model, but this time with an emphasis on rumour-busting.
Una Hakika (Swahili for “are you sure?”) created the Wikirumours platform, seek-
ing to offer neutral information pertaining to the various tribes in the area obtained
through surveys. This offers an alternative to information exchange via rumours,
and aims to reduce harm and conflict in the region.
In thinking about impacts from data journalism, it is important to go beyond simple
statistics such as the number of readers or re-tweets, to look instead at how stories
are stimulating public debate, or helping to overcome indifference and inertia in the
policy process by engaging the public, politicians, and donors.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-media-and-culture/
24

2525
Data + Indigenous People = Indigenous Voices
Open data in the context of indigenous peoples and communities can
be understood as a double-edged sword. On the one hand, open data
can help indigenous communities, both internally and externally.
Internally, it can be used to inform policy, allocate resources, and set
a vision for indigenous communities and spaces; externally, it can be
used to influence public opinion, change perceptions of indigenous
people, and help them work towards obtaining available resources.
On the other hand, the concept of opening up data is accompanied
by numerous challenges and concerns pertaining to privacy and in-
digenous information rights. In this light, various questions come
forth, such as: What data do we make open? How will it be opened?
To whom will it be opened?
The concept of data sovereignty has emerged as a particularly salient
one for nations whose sovereignty, and whose representation within
data has often been contested. The concept can be described as the
ability to practice self-rule when it comes to data and the opening of
data. This extends to the capacity of indigenous people to gather data
for their own purposes and use. This is particularly important, as in-
digenous communities are commonly under-represented or exclud-
ed from large-scale national surveys. Even when they are included,
some of the information obtained may not be useful or applicable to
indigenous communities.
Tribal Ventures, a ten-year project in partnership with the Northwest
Area Foundation to reduce poverty of the Cheyenne River people—a
large indigenous reservation in South Dakota—orchestrated a reser-
vation-widehouseholdsurveyin2012-2013.Theprojectemployedand
educated their own tribal citizens to conduct the surveys and analysis.
The information obtained in this survey sought to cater to the specific
needs of the Cheyenne River people; the data continues to be used to
inform citizens about their community and to inform various teams
and organizations on the reserve to help better their work. Being that
this project was conducted by and is used for the actual communities
which it serves, this model has piqued interest among other indige-
nous groups seeking to rid their communities of data poverty and gain
control of the information about their culture, people, and spaces.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-indigenous-data-open-governments/

2626
Data + Public Money = Citizen Leadership
Understanding how public money is spent is a fundamental goal for many open data
projects. But the release of data alone does not automatically create the citizen en-
gagement and accountability that open government advocates seek. Beyond mak-
ing data available, the next step is to get people to engage and take action with it. To
work on connecting data and action:
Bond, the UK membership body for organizations working in or supporting
international development, launched the Aid Attitude Tracker to get citizens
of the UK to pay attention to how development aid is being spent.
La Nación of Argentina crowdsourced the manual entry of MP expenses
through scrape-athons to raise awareness of government corruption.
Open Data Lab Jakarta produced infographics that have run in local media to
bring fiscal data to citizens, and have run training workshops to equip citi-
zens in Indonesia and the Philippines to monitor project implementation.
Although in each of these cases some information on public money was in the pub-
lic domain, it was only when intermediaries got involved that it was turned into
actionable data, and that space for citizen leadership was opened up.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/data-public-money/
Data + Public Sector Accountability = Citizen Empowerment
While governments have long been releasing certain public records, the open data
movement has created a demand for more information and more data. Governments
have responded slowly and inconsistently. When data is released at all it is often pro-
vided in formats that limit reuse, such as scanned PDFs. The push from citizens and
civil society for open data has ushered in new practices of data use and analysis, with
the potential to disrupt long-established customs of secrecy, and to identify corrup-
tion and bad practices that are otherwise hidden in a mountain of inaccessible docu-
ments. Open data is being used to pursue accountability across government:
In Jamaica, activists attribute a substantial proportion of the nation’s debt to political
corruption. The Jamaican Civil Society Coalition have come together to create a gov-
ernance scorecard to assess transparency drawing on a range of open data sources.
Responding to widespread distrust of Slovakia’s judicial system, a few years ago,
the Slovakian government moved to publish judicial verdicts online. Responding

2727
to usability problems with the website, Transparency International (TI) in Slovakia
created an alternative site titled “Open Courts”, presenting all the judicial data in
a more user-friendly manner and with improved search features. Using this data,
TI has piloted a methodology measuring how good and efficient court verdicts are.
They have also been able to map family connections of judiciaries, finding that 1/5
of Slovakian judges have family connections in the courts.
The EU Integrity Watch website scrapes PDF files that are meant to disclose infor-
mation about all politicians’ side activities and uses this to look for officials’ con-
flicts of interest, corporate influence on politicians, and unequal access to political
decision-making. Through turning this information into data, EU Integrity Watch
has been able to identify a number of cases of concern, although a lack of sanctions
limits the extent to which detection ultimately leads to increased accountability.
For true data-enabled accountability, mechanisms are needed to act in response
to concerns that are raised. Data does not replace good legal frameworks and em-
powered institutions, but it greatly increases the ability of citizens to engage in the
scrutiny process, and to increase detection of issues.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-public-sector-accountability/

2828
Data + Parliaments = Supporting Scrutiny
By turning the mountains of transcripts, documents, and records generated in par-
liaments into data, civil society groups have been able to transform the scrutiny of
law-making from something that required a parliamentary pass or being an insider,
to something that is increasingly accessible to all citizens.
Projects like SayIt, a reusable software component from the Poplus project co-devel-
oped by civic technology groups around the world, are powering websites that enable
users to search through and explore transcripts from parliaments and public enqui-
ries. For example, The People’s Assembly parliamentary monitoring website from
South Africa aggregates together transcripts and questions and answers from parlia-
ment, presenting this in an engaging and accessible form. While many implemen-
tations of SayIt rely on data scraped from government records, common standards
have been developed for parliamentary transcripts, allowing parliaments to publish
an authoritative, structured, and machine-readable record of their discussions.
In Papua New Guinea, the Open Parliament Project has worked to make data on all
aspects of parliaments operation available. This works by capturing information in
a database so that it can power both a website and an interactive SMS-based service
for citizens to track what their MPs are doing. The system means citizens no longer
need to travel to get the information they want, and has led to increased engage-
ment and improved public perceptions of parliament.
Elsewhere, groups have used crowdsourcing of public documents and direct requests for
data to investigate issues such as parliamentary expenses, salaries, and audit reports.
Often open data initiatives have focused on the executive branch of government alone.
Yet, various countries have developed parliamentary specific projects, and parliaments
are increasingly seeing the benefits of having their own dedicated open data initiatives.
EXPLORE MORE
http://opendatacon.org/webcast/recording-data-parliaments/
SUMMARY
Communities across the world are making use of open data to deliver social,
economic, and political impacts.
Open data offers new space and new strategies for action across a variety of sectors.
Companies and activists are often investing time converting inaccessible
information into open data in order to be able to innovate—removing this costly
and time-consuming step would unlock even more innovation opportunities.

THE ROAD AHEAD
Understanding
the Big Picture

3030
THE ROAD AHEAD
Understanding the Big Picture
A few years ago, debates about open data centred on dataset formats and data por-
tals—not any more. Today, the open data debate covers an increasingly broad spec-
trum of topics: from comprehensive principles for open data and the measurement of
impact, to the development of common standards, and critical issues such as privacy,
multilingual data communities, and indigenous knowledge. The focus is no longer
just on national executive branch data; the conversation has extended to cover mu-
nicipal data, justice, and parliamentary data, and even data from the private sector.
Sessions at IODC spanned across this whole agenda. The conference hosted plenary
sessions on the issues at the centre of the data revolution and explored the role that
open data has to play in delivering substantive change in areas such as open gov-
ernment, sustainable development, and economic prosperity.
The pre-IODC unConference debated critical questions and practical actions on the global open data agenda

3131
Principles for the Revolution
We cannot assume that the data
revolution will be open by default.
Martin Tisné, Director of Policy, Omidyar Network
We are still in the initial years of an era that
will see dramatic social change resulting
from vastly increased data collection and
analytic capacity. There are many examples
to show that this can be harnessed to sup-
port social progress. However, unless the
right practices and principles are embedded
now, it could also lead to the centralization of
power, increasing social exclusion and grow-
ing divides. Openness is a vital tool to shape
the data revolution.
As the open cities panels at IODC explored,
when a principle of “open by default” is
baked into the way governments and busi-
nesses operate, the emphasis can be shift-
ed from centralized “smart cities”, to “open
cities” and “smart citizens”, where data en-
ables civic participation and distributed in-
novation. At the national level, making open
data part of the infrastructure of government
and markets can help to hold increasingly
complex systems of governance and trade to
account. Projects like Open Corporates are
demonstrating the importance of opening up
key business registers; delivering the infor-
mation that is needed for both the effective
operation and regulation of markets.
If open data is to be more than a just policy an-
nouncement and the release of a few datasets,
clear shared principles are needed that set out
thepathforgovernmentsandotherstakehold-

3232
ers to follow in transforming how they operate. Building on the G8 Open Data Charter,
launched in 2013, and recognizing the need for a broader international charter—which
would be relevant across countries at all levels of development—IODC saw the launch
of a consultation on a new International Open Data Charter. As Stephen Walker of the
Treasury Board Secretariat of the Government of Canada explained:
1. Manyjurisdictionsacrosstheworldhaveengagedwithopendata,butcommonprin-
ciples and specific commitments are needed to help them move to the next phase.
2. For those that have not started yet, the Charter works as a foundational dec-
laration of commitment, and offers common ground to accelerate the process,
providing the means to pursue the political support needed.
3. With a wide range of potential forms of open data initiatives, the Charter will
provide common ground to realize the potential of open data.
Following consultation on the final text, supported by regional outreach, the Char-
ter is due to be launched in autumn 2015. It will be accompanied by a resource centre
developed through open and inclusive processes, and bringing together expertise
and insights from government, civil society, and the private sector. Although di-
rected at governments, the Charter principles also have a role in shaping the agenda
for international institutions, civil society and the private sector.
THE INTERNATIONAL OPEN DATA CHARTER (DRAFT)
FIVE PRINCIPLES
Open Data by Default
Quality and Quantity
Accessible and Useable by All
Engagement and Empowerment of Citizens
Collaboration for Development and Innovation

3333
DEBATING PRINCIPLES
Developing international principles for open data involves thinking deeply about
critical issues such as digital divides, privacy, and indigenous knowledge.
With countries, cities, and international institutions at very different stages of dig-
ital capabilities, principles need to set broad and ambitious goals, which are tailored
in their application according to local needs and context. Ania Calderón, Coordina-
tor of National Digital Strategy in the Office of the President of Mexico, highlights
that the Charter is a process as well as a document. It should be a reflection of global
conversations and a learning mechanism; one that engages communities in the im-
plementation of open data policies to identify the data that is most useful, and to
co-create local solutions to deliver on the principles and on local priorities.
When it comes to privacy, there needs to be clear recognition of the rights of citi-
zens to protection from the abuse of their data, and clear understanding of the dif-
ferent kinds of data that governments and private enterprises hold. A principle of
“open by default” does not mean that everything should be open, nor that there is
a binary choice between open and closed. It does mean the decision not to provide
open data should be clearly justified, but there can be legitimate claims for restrict-
ed data-sharing, such as in the case of indigenous communities, seeking “data sov-
ereignty” to protect community-held knowledge from external exploitation.
EMBEDDING OPEN DATA PRINCIPLES IN THE SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
In September 2015, governments will agree on the Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs), setting a framework for global action over the next 15 years. As part of this, they
will agree on actions to harness the data revolution for development, improving the
data available to monitor progress towards the goals, and increasing the use of data to
drive delivery of the goals. With much of the emphasis on increasing the use of private
sector data, and investing in increased capacity for existing statistical data collection,
there is a need to identify how principles of openness will work here in practice.
The recent African Data Consensus provides a key contribution to this task, recog-
nizing the importance of openness as a cross-cutting theme for all data producers
and users, and setting out a vision for a “partnership of all data communities that
upholds the principles of official statistics as well as openness across the data value
chain, which creates a vibrant data ecosystem providing timely, user-driven and
disaggregated data for public good and inclusive development”4
. This will involve
4 Available at http://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/Africa-Data-Consensus.pdf (emphasis added).

3434
work to embed the culture and skills for open data in many different professional
groups: from healthcare to GIS. Often the formal training available to data profes-
sionals in these fields is a number of years behind the cutting edge. This highlights
a need for professional development that can equip public finance experts, geodata
practitioners, and health informatics specialists, amongst others, with the skills
and confidence to work with open data tools and approaches.
There is no question about it, open data is central to the data
revolution . . . The revolution aims to be open in more than one
sense. More than just open data. It is open also about the types of
partnerships that can be formed to improve the data landscape; to
be inclusive of various data sources beyond the traditional.
Amparo Ballivan, Lead Economist, World Bank

3535
The Open Seventeen project, launched at IODC, draws attention to the fact that
applying open data principles is not about a “read only” approach to data, but
involves creating engagement and two-way dialogues around data. ONE, in col-
laboration with the Citizen Cyberscience Centre, the Crowdcrafting platform and
the GovLab have called for ideas on how evidence on the implementation of the
SDGs can be crowdsourced, giving citizens the power to create, as well as to an-
alyze open data. Embedding rich principles of openness in the SDGs process will
be a key challenge for the nascent Global Partnership on Development Data. IODC
debated potential structures for the Partnership, from a civil society campaign,
to a standing multi-stakeholder initiative. Whatever form it takes, building com-
plementarity between a Global Partnership, the International Open Data Charter,
existing global fora such as the Open Government Partnership, and local open data
initiatives, offers a key opportunity to accelerate progress in securing the right
kind of data revolution.
Building an Open Data Infrastructure
As the open data agenda matures, many open data communities have shifted their
attention from getting access to data, to critically constructing new open data in-
frastructures. Just like physical infrastructures such as roads, rail, power lines, and
telecom networks that powered development over the last 100 years, datasets have
become a crucial part of our modern infrastructure. Ambitious programs are under-
way to establish standards and shared identifiers that will make it possible to “fol-
low the money” in public budgets, and to accelerate the exchange of ideas and tools
from one location to another. Although infrastructures often fade into the back-
ground, understanding how they are being shaped is crucial to shaping our future.
At IODC, the Open Data Institute (ODI) launched a conversation about the owner-
ship of data infrastructures. The data required to govern our world is increasingly
collected and managed by private firms. Datasets that might formerly have been
state generated and held are being privatized, or established for the first time from
private data sources. Without the right contracts and agreements in place, this data
can quickly become inaccessible to politicians and citizens, restricting their ability
to scrutinize or reuse it. Similar to physical infrastructure, data infrastructures can
be built well—created with a focus on quality, sustainability, and accessibility—or
they can be built poorly, with disparate datasets that do not join up, bias towards
particular communities, and barriers that exclude particular groups of users.

3636
APPLYING THE STANDARDS WE HAVE
Promoting good practices on open data standards is key to scaling the impact of
open data. Open data users frequently face small but time consuming technical hur-
dles that slow down progress towards open data impact. Balancing the consistency
and reusability of data with the great variation in national and regional structures,
cultures, and political processes requires carefully designed data standards and
common approaches to build the right levels of interoperability.
Research by Open North for the Open Government Partnership Open Data Working
Group5
has shown that many open data initiatives currently struggle to apply stan-
dards and good practices to their data and metadata, either unaware of the standards
they could use, or overwhelmed by a long list of issues to address without a clear
sense of priority. Increased awareness and education about standards is import-
ant to address this, as is work to more clearly identify when standardization mat-
ters most. At IODC, a facilitated workshop demonstrated the importance of talking
about standards, inviting participants to share their needs for data standards, and
the standards they knew about. Most left with new ideas to help them in their work;
however, the session also identified a number of standard gaps in need of attention.
BUILDING USER-CENTRED STANDARDS
Decision-makers and those that hold them accountable—whether at the local, na-
tional, or global level—require access to usable, meaningful information that sheds
light on the problems they are seeking to solve. Finding this information often in-
volves joining up data from various independent sources. In the past, this process
has involved expensive, painstaking, and time consuming work. To enable everyone
to have access to the kinds of responsive and real-time analysis that the data revo-
lution promises, new public data infrastructures are being developed.
The Joined Up Data Alliance, launched at IODC, will be working over the coming
years to bring together groups involved in setting data standards in order to “fos-
ter user-centred design in creation and dissemination of [open data] standards”6
and to ensure that different data communities can work together across geographic
and sectoral boundaries. This does not mean one top-down standard, but involves
finding points of connection and collaboration between different groups, including
in the governance and change-control of technical standards and shared codelists.
Creating user centred standards can involve a range of approaches. For example, the
Humanitarian Exchange Language (HXL) was iteratively developed, working with
5 See: http://opendatacon.org/why-do-we-struggle-to-standardize-and-what-should-we-prioritize/
6 Joined Up Data Alliance: Statement of Collaboration. See: http://bit.ly/iodc-jud

3737
practitioners in the field and progressively cutting the standard down to a small set
of core elements that support exchange of critical information. The Open Contracting
Data Standard was built around a series of different use cases, offering a much larger
set of possible fields, but backed by an implementation model that encourages pub-
lishers and users to negotiate over priorities in the short, medium, and long term.
multi-country region
country name
administrative
subdivisions
admin level 1 p-code
place (camp, building, etc.)
geographical info
latitude
longitude
#activity
#org
#contact
#sector
#subsector
#indicator
#capacity
#output
#operations
project or activity name
organisation name
contact info
sector or cluster name
subsector name
indicator name
response capacity
activity output
operation-related info
#affected
#inneed
#targeted
#reached
#population
#beneficiary
number affected
number in need
number targeted
number reached
population category
beneficiary category
#region
#country
#adm1
.. #adm5
#adm1+code
#loc
#geo
#geo+lat
#geo+lon
Places Responses and other operations
People and households
crisis/emergency name
crisis or incident cause
crisis or incident impact
crisis or incident severity
day or period
e.g. active
general text
general meta data
#date
#status
#description
#meta
Extras
#crisis
#cause
#impact
#severity
Crises and incidents
HumanitarianExchangeLanguage
hxlstandard.org
hxlstandard.org
The Humanitarian Exchange Language Index Card: exploring accessible approaches to data standards
THE POLITICS OF DATA
Data is not neutral. The fields included in a dataset, the categories used, and the way
it is provided, all have consequences. Thinking about data infrastructures can draw
attention to what is being counted, and whose interests are being served. Indige-
nous communities, for example, often live in multiple settlements and in undefined
jurisdictions that do not fit into census sampling, which has in the past led to inac-
curacies in vital statistics, with major consequences for policy and programs.
Governments are increasingly engaging with projects like OpenStreetMap, the largest
citizen-generated open dataset in the world, showing the potential for shared data
infrastructures in which bottom-up representations of the world can co-exist and
intermingle with “official” data. However, there is much to be done to make sure all
citizens have the opportunity to shape the data that describes their world, and to en-
sure that the data used in public debate is properly subject to scrutiny and discussion.

3838
An Engine of Innovation
The impact stories shared at IODC and in Chapter Two are a testament to what can
happen when barriers to collaboration are removed, and different groups can ex-
periment with new ideas to solve problems, deliver services, or build businesses.
These are just some of the examples of how open data drives innovation; there are
many more cases of process-innovation inside organizations, enabled by lower costs
of data acquisition and use. These myriad uses of data to drive both marginal and
transformative changes in how governments and businesses operate are behind the
figures that attribute multiple billions of dollars in value to opening data. However,
as IODC delegates also discussed, innovation is not an automatic consequence of
data publication; it requires the right environment and support.
HARNESSING THE POTENTIAL
Estimates have put the annual potential economic value of open data as high as $3-5
trillion, with the benefits shared between data-driven businesses and the end-users
of the services provided by those businesses. However, the route to achieving the high
levels of benefit on a global scale is not clearly understood. Without a good under-
standing, policies and interventions cannot be designed to maximize and accelerate the
achievement of the benefits. There are already disparities not just between developed
countries and developing countries but also within regions. A recent study suggests
that some countries in the European Union would gain double the per-capita benefits
of others because of structural and skills differences7
. Likewise, a few countries such as
Kenya, Ghana, and Senegal are already outpacing other African countries in bringing
data-driven applications to market and delivering benefits to the users of those ser-
vices. Some in developing countries have also started to question the extent to which
the release of their data will benefit other countries at the expense of their own.
Leadinggovernmentshavemovedpasttheinitialapproachofleavingopendataexploita-
tion to the market alone, and are now investing significant time and resources in working
with businesses. This can be seen, for example, in the growing support for organizations
like ODI, which provides incubation support to start-up open data businesses, and the
“business open data roundtables” hosted by departments of the US Government. These
modelsmovebeyondone-offhackathonstoexploresustainedwaysofbuildingopendata
enterprise and innovation. Much more work is needed to understand how such models
can scale up and out in different environments around the world.
7 Big and Open Data in Europe: A Growth Engine or a Missed Opportunity?
See: http://www.bigopendata.eu/ (WISE/Demos Europa)

3939
PROBLEM SOLVING WITH DATA
The Open Data Roundtables model brings together government officials—who have
both access to data and an understanding of key policy problems—with innovators
from outside government. GODAN is exploring ways to connect up stakeholders
across different countries and different sectors around shared problems. Innova-
tion and open data fellowship programs around the world are embedding profes-
sionals from outside of government inside the state to work on specific projects.
These models all seek to reconnect open data with practical problem solving.
Striking the balance of focus between building the infrastructures needed to address
shared problems in the future, and using the data we have now to find innovative
solutions to existing problems, is a key challenge for the open data movement. The
best open data approaches combine the two.
Open Data for All
While some countries and cities possess the technical capability, relevant skills,
and social capital to implement open data initiatives quickly and easily, in other
parts of the world, capacity is constrained and resources scarce. It is incumbent
upon those who are already advanced in the world of open data to support those
hoping to take advantage of data’s potential benefits. It is also important to avoid a
one-size-fits-all approach to capacity building, identifying “best fit” strategies for
different countries, contexts, and domains.

4040
Thinking about the open data ecosystem in terms of both supply and demand, there
are two largely separate audiences to be addressed by capacity building initiatives. On
the supply side are governments who might need support in opening up their own
data, incorporating it into their own workflows, and using it internally. On the demand
side are groups often referred to as “data intermediaries” and users—including actors
from civil society and the media—who need the skills to be able to understand how to
use the data in their work, and make those results accessible to the public. Only with
support for both sides of this ecosystem will open data live up to its full potential.
OPEN IN ALL LANGUAGES
Data might be online, machine readable, and openly licensed,but if the tools to use
it or the data itself are in a language a citizen cannot read, the data is not practically
open to them. Adapting open data tools to work in multiple languages and sup-
porting the development of local language tools are important for an inclusive and
responsive data revolution. While English is still the predominant language in open
data discourses and in datasets, there are growing Spanish and Francophone com-
munities, which were strongly represented at IODC.
With France as the next co-chair of the Open Government Partnership, momen-
tum around the Francophone open data community is growing, and the next IODC
conference will take place in Spain, continuing to provide essential opportunities to
bridge skills, experience, ideas, and learning across language communities.
BUILDING CAPACITY
Over the last few years organizations have developed a range of approaches to
open data capacity building, from School of Data training and World Bank Data
Bootcamps, to embedded fellowship programs and online learning resources.
However, these are just a drop in the ocean when it comes to meeting the demand
for data skills. Building on learning from these programs, and upon a clear map
of the capabilities that different stakeholders need in order to publish or use data,
work is needed to develop more comprehensive opportunities for capacity build-
ing. This calls for work that will explore different pedagogies, and that will embed
open data learning in formal education and organizational training, as well as pro-
viding informal learning opportunities.
If the data revolution is to be one that truly empowers all citizens, then all citizens
need access, either directly or through trusted intermediaries, to the skills to create,
critique, use, and act with open data.

4141
Monitoring and Measurement
Common definitions, measurements, and metrics are important to help bench-
mark the progress of countries in implementing open data initiatives and securing
a return on their efforts and investments. Tools such as the Open Data Barometer,
which provides a comparative assessment of over 80 countries, have fast become an
established reference resource for governments and civil society.
Effective measurement needs to be robust, yet also needs to be flexible enough to re-
spond to different government structures, priorities, and situations. For example, as-
sessing the supply of data at a national level may work for centralized governments,
but may fail to capture the complexity of federal systems. Adaptable tools like the
Open Data Census, with it’s local, regional, and city editions in which local commu-
nities identify key datasets they want to assess, provide one way of dealing with this.
CONNECTING RESEARCH AND ACTION
The Open Data Research Symposium, a fringe event of IODC, featured a number
of papers that looked in detail at measurement. Rubinstein, Davies, and Grey8
re-
viewed existing comparative measurements of country open data performance,
looking at the four different areas in which current studies focus: country context,
data supply, data use, and impacts. They found limited work looking systematically
at understanding data use, pointing to a gap in current open data analysis. Walker,
Frank, and Thompson9
reported on pilot work to better align measurements of data
supply with the criteria that are important to data users, placing an emphasis on ac-
cessible documentation of data and discoverability of datasets. Fumega10
compared
8 Rubinstein, Davies Grey. (paper forthcoming). Assessing open data assessments. See: http://bit.ly/odrs2015
9 Walker, Frank Thomson. (2015). User-centrered methods for measuring the value of open data.
See: http://bit.ly/odrs-60
10 Fumega. (2015). Understanding mechanisms to access government information and data around the world.
See: http://bit.ly/odrs-1

4242
and contrasted data acquisition through open data and Right to Information (RTI)
approaches, highlighting the need to understand the whole landscape of access to
reusable data, and to maintain strong connections between both the research and
practitioner communities around RTI and open data.
Researchers are working to develop shared frameworks for capturing quantitative
and qualitative information about open data, building on deepening theoretical un-
derstandings of key concepts such as “data user”, “intermediary”, and “ecosys-
tem”. By discussing concepts and frameworks in a global forum, researchers can
strengthen their ability to know when findings generalize across contexts and when
they are locally specific.
In open data communities evidence of impact is, unsurprisingly, in high demand.
Open data projects need to consider how they will capture quantitative and qualita-
tive data to feed into ongoing research, deepening understandings of how to act in
what remains a comparatively young field.
SUMMARY
Open data is central to the data revolution.
Open data enables more effective monitoring of the SDGs.
Open data enables greater collaboration and innovation in delivering on the SDGs.
Both shared global principles and local action are needed to unlock the full
value of investments in data.
Joined-up open data infrastructures are a vital foundation for accountable
governance and inclusive development in an increasingly complex world.
Broad efforts are needed to ensure open data is accessible to all, including
attentiveness to issues of language and culture, and strategic capacity building
interventions through informal and formal learning.
Shared approaches to monitoring and measurement, rooted in an
understanding of citizen need, are important to power learning and strategic
action on open data impact.

NEXT STEPS
An Action Plan
for International
Collaboration

44
NEXT STEPS
An Action Plan for International Collaboration
ACTION
Throughout the preparation for IODC, the pre-events, and the conference itself,
there has been a focus on international collaboration. A network of organizations
worked to craft problem statements and to facilitate conference discussion of
potential collaborative actions. Through online discussion and face-to-face sessions,
they identified key steps for the open data community to take in order to deliver an
inclusive open data infrastructure and to deepen the existing impact of open data.
This session synthesizes and summarizes the action agenda from IODC, setting out
areas for shared action over the coming year.
More detailed copies of the actions described here, along with detailed background blog
posts and discussions on each action area, can be found on the conference website.
44

4545
Actions
To unlock the full potential of an open data revolution will require international col-
laboration. Government, civil society, and the private sector must all play their part to:
CHARTER
DELIVER SHARED PRINCIPLES FOR OPEN DATA
Common, fundamental principles are vital in order to unlock a sustainable
supply of high quality open data, and to create the foundations for inclusive
and effective open data use. The International Open Data Charter will provide
principles for open data policy, relevant to governments at all levels of
development and supported by implementation resources and working groups.
STANDARDS
DEVELOPANDADOPTGOODPRACTICESANDOPENSTANDARDSFORDATAPUBLICATION
Standards groups must work together for joined up, interoperable data, and
must focus on priority practices rooted in user needs.
Data publishers must work to identify and adopt shared standards and remove the
technology and policy barriers that are frequently preventing data reuse.
SKILLS AND LEARNING
BUILD CAPACITY TO PRODUCE AND USE OPEN DATA EFFECTIVELY
Government open data leaders need increased opportunities for networking and
peer-learning. Models are needed to support private sector and civil society open
data champions in working to unlock the economic and social potential of open data.
Work is needed to identify and embed core competencies for working with open
data within existing organizational training, formal education, and informal
learning programs.

4646
PROBLEM SOLVING
STRENGTHEN OPEN DATA INNOVATION NETWORKS
Investment, support, and strategic action is needed to scale social and
economic open data innovations that work. Organizations should commit to
using open data strategies in addressing key sectoral challenges.
Open data innovation networks and thematic collaborations in areas such
as health, agriculture, and parliamentary openness will facilitate the spread
of ideas, tools, and skills— supporting context-aware and high-impact
innovation exchange.
MEASUREMENT
ADOPT COMMON MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION TOOLS
Researchers should work together to avoid duplication, to increase the rigour of
open data assessments, and to build a shared, contextualized, evidence base on
what works. Reusable methodological tools that measure the supply, use, and
outcomes of open data are vital.
To ensure the data revolution delivers open data, open data assessment
methods must also be embedded within domain-specific surveys, including
assessments of national statistical data.
All stakeholders should work to monitor and evaluate their open data activities,
contributing to research and shared learning on securing the greatest social
impact for an open data revolution.

4747
CHARTER
Shared Principles
IODC15 brought together governments, international agencies, private companies
and nonprofits, who have collectively made hundreds of commitments to increase
the supply and use of open data. These organizations are working in many different
countries and contexts, yet are all moving in a common direction. Local action can be
stronger and more coordinated when framed within the context of shared principles.
An International Open Data Charter will establish shared, global principles for open
data and will act as a framework for shared learning and evaluation of progress to-
wards a world where government data is open by default.
Building on efforts that have already been undertaken in relation to the G8 Open
Data Charter, the G20 commitment to open data principles, the UN Secretary Gen-
eral’s Independent Expert Advisory Group on the Data Revolution, the Data Revo-
lution Task Force, the Africa Data Consensus, and a number of other multilateral
groups and initiatives, the International Open Data Charter is being designed as
an inclusive, universally relevant, and accessible set of principles for governments
to adopt and work to put into practice, backed by supporting guidance on effective
open data implementation.
Delivering on the Charter will involve:
Consolidation of a stewardship group with broad representation from differ-
ent countries, sectors, and backgrounds. The stewardship group will develop a
sustainable model for the ongoing renewal and implementation of the Charter,
and ongoing assessment of its impact.
Developing a resource centre containing definitions, guidelines, recommended
core datasets, tools, and resources. The resource centre will include an invento-
ry of standards and a maturity model for assessing open data implementation.
The launch and progressive adoption of the Charter. The Charter will be
launched in late 2015, and promoted throughout open data related events in the
coming year, with a rolling program of work to engage new governments and
other stakeholders.
Many of the following actions in this section also contribute to the development of
a mechanism for implementation of the Open Data Charter by IODC 2016.

48
STANDARDS
Good Practices
and Open Standards
Too often the potential of open data is hindered by poor application of common
standards and good practices for data licensing, file formats, publication pat-
terns, documentation, and data schema. Data publishers should focus on meet-
ing minimum good practices and increasing the quality and interoperability of
their data as quickly as possible.
For this, data publishers will need guidance and support to prioritize the application
of good practices and standards. Building stronger links between technical standards
communities and the producers and users of open government data is vital to ensure
that best practices put forward serve the needs of all citizens, businesses, and gov-
ernments wanting to use data, rather than assuming high levels of technical skill.
Also, the IODC community made a number of commitments to action that will help
to deliver on this agenda, including:
Strengthen and prioritize good practice recommendations, building on the
work of the Open Government Partnership Open Data Working Group, and the
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Data on the Web Best Practices Working
Group. There is a need to continually broaden engagement in the conversation
about standards, ensuring that they connect with the needs and capacity of
practitioners engaged in everyday production and use of open data.
48

49
Build connections among open standards. Launched at IODC, the Joined Up
Data Alliance is a coalition of open data standards setters, users, and advocates
committing to collaborate on matters of mutual interest in the development and
usage of data standards—especially in relation to supranational and cross-domain
issues. The Alliance will identify shared challenges, such as common organization
identifiers, and will collaborate on common approaches to address them.
Fostering awareness and use of common standards. The Connecting
Standards workshop at IODC offered a facilitated space for knowledge
exchange between policy makers and open data practitioners, aiding
discovery and discussion of existing data standards, and identification of
gaps that need to be filled. Future open data events should include space for
similar peer-to-peer knowledge exchange. The adoption of shared standards
and the creation of connections between them relies first and foremost on
building connections between the people who are creating and using data in
different settings around the world.
As we start to plan for IODC 2016, the community should continue to work together
to build mechanisms to set out general best practices for data publication, as well as
suggesting domain-specific standards. The Open Data Charter will create Technical
Annexes to validate these recommended practices. Standard-setting groups respon-
sible for domain-specific standards need to work together, enabling users to make
connections across datasets that will allow accountability groups to “follow the mon-
ey”, and that will support entrepreneurs to scale up solutions more smoothly.
49

5050
SKILLS AND LEARNING
Build Capacity
Building sustainable open data infrastructures and enabling the effective use of open
data requires both clear leadership and access to a broad range of skills and expertise.
Organizations from all sectors need to make strategic investments in staff and com-
munity capacity across the whole open data value-chain, including skills for:
setting open data policy
supplying open data;
using open data; and
understanding, analyzing, and mobilizing data to create change.
The IODC community identified the need for concerted efforts to deliver greater
open data capacity through:
Expanded opportunities for leadership development and networking. Oppor-
tunities for leaders to meet together and exchange knowledge should be ex-
tended. This will include activities ranging from ad-hoc match-making through
the GovLab Network of Innovators, to facilitated knowledge exchange opportu-
nities such as the ODI Open Data Leaders Network (ODLN) and the Organization
of American States (OAS) Open Government Fellowships and workshops.

51
An open data competency map. Organizations need a comprehensive map of the
different clusters of skills, knowledge, and abilities that are required to success-
fully implement open data initiatives. This map should be developed based on
an understanding of the different levels of development and needs in different
countries and sectors around the world.
Cataloging and evaluating capacity building resources. There are many open
data capacity building interventions and programs available around the world, but
there are also many gaps and few interventions that have been rigorously evaluat-
ed. There is a need for strategies that could help organizations identify, select, and
evaluate capacity building options for open data implementation and use.
Increased formal and information education provision on data literacy. Schools,
colleges, and universities need to develop and provide high-quality formal courses
supported by open educational resources, which utilize a range of learning styles
to focus on both data science skills and upon open data issues. Accredited cours-
es will help build institutional recognition of open data skills. Existing training of
data management, GIS, and other related issues needs to be updated to reflect the
emergence of open data.
Building on the success of School of Data Summer Camp and the Open Data Leaders
Summit in 2015, the IODC 2016 should also bring together some of the most in-
novative experiences on capacity building, helping to meet the grand challenge of
ensuring open data is accessible to all.
51

5252
PROBLEM SOLVING
Strengthen Open Data Innovation Networks
Different communities are working to understand the role of data in relation to a
wide range of issues—from health and agriculture, to environmental sustainability
and good governance. Open data is not just another community, it is a method that
can be applied to practical problem solving across these different domains.
Scaling up the social and economic impacts of open data will require the right in-
vestments, methods, and business models to address key problems. Open data in-
novation networks and thematic collaborations in areas such as health, agriculture,
and parliamentary openness will facilitate the spread of ideas, tools, and skills—
supporting context-aware and high-impact innovation exchange.
IODC 2015 hosted a number of sector-specific networks, each committed to scaling
innovation and impact. These included:
Agriculture and Nutrition. GODAN brings together over 120 member
organizations from different sectors and settings around the world to work on
practical problem solving with open data, including using open data as a platform
for economic development for entrepreneurs and small-holder farmers.
Parliamentary Openness. The Open Parliaments Network is working to
improve emerging international standards in the areas of parliamentary
ethics, campaign finance, and lobbying. By creating standards based around
engagement with users, tools and approaches for scrutinizing data can be more
easily exchanged between practitioners from different countries.
Health: Dengue Fever. Recent work in Paraguay has demonstrated the
potential of open data in the surveillance of Dengue outbreaks in Latin
America. In partnership with governments, civil society, and relevant
stakeholders, ILDA is developing alliances to foster the creation and use of
this data to improve outbreak monitoring and planning in the region.
To scale up social and economic innovation further, the IODC community identified
the need for:
Ongoing mapping of existing open data impacts and innovations. Projects such
as the Open Data Impact Map support the systematic identification of existing
cases of data use and impact, and enabling research into the local factors that
unlock the promise of open data. Ongoing work is needed to identify, evaluate,
and share stories of open data use in addressing key problems. IODC 2016 will
further build on the impact session from IODC 20515 to contribute to this agenda.

5353
New investments mechanisms to catalyze private sector innovation with open
data, particularly in developing countries. Effective networks for private sector
innovation should encourage dialogue between governments and the private
sector about priority datasets. Private sector organizations should also be pushed
to consider the benefits of opening up their own data. Models to build upon
include the Open Data Exchange in Canada and the Open Data Alliance in Taiwan.
The Private Sector Working Group of the International Open Data Charter will
also focus on ensuring greater support for entrepreneurs and enterprise use of
open data, including building capacity in developing economies.
Support for new sectoral initiatives. Further investment and brokering is
needed to catalyze innovation with open data, particularly in developing
countries. During the forthcoming year, government, private sector, NGOs,
and international development organizations should continue to make greater
explicit commitments to explore open data strategies when addressing key
sectoral challenges.
IODC 2016 should provide space for further sectoral networks to meet, share learn-
ing, and work together in the effective and high-impact use of open data.

5454
MEASUREMENT
Common Measurement and Evaluation Tools
The ability to compare and evaluate the outcomes of open data initiatives is vital to
understand and improve the impact of open data in supporting the effectiveness
of government spending, economic development, and the fight against corruption,
among other areas. Governments, developers, researchers, and civil society are
continuously seeking both quantitative and qualitative evidence that can be used to
inform analysis, benchmark performance, and improve practice.
Building on the existing Common Assessment Methods for Open Data framework,
researchers should come together to map existing studies, their methodologies,
targets, and audiences, identifying areas for deeper collaboration and shared meth-
ods and metrics to focus on. This will provide reusable methods and tools that can
strengthen the rigour and comprehensiveness of the open data evidence base, which
can be used in monitoring progress against Open Data Charter principles.
All actors involved in open data initiatives should work to monitor and evaluate their open
dataactivitiesusingthesesharedframeworks,contributingtoresearchandsharedlearning.
Collaborative commitments in this area include:
Refine common assessment methods for open data. Partners will work together
to update, extend, and further develop the current Common Assessment Methods
for Open Data framework—including a library of definition, taxonomies, metrics,
and guidance materials on how to apply and contextualize them. Anyone planning
an open data assessment project is invited to draw upon the Common Assessment
Method Framework, and to get involved in shaping its future.
Network researchers. Building on the Open Data Research Network, and
Common Assessment Methods mailing list, an ongoing space for dialogue among
researchers working on open data measurement and evaluation will be established,
and opportunities identified to gather researchers together for in-person dialogue.
Develop domain specific assessments: starting with national statistics.
National Statistical Offices (NSOs) play a central role in capturing data to
support the monitoring of SDGs. They provide a key official source of national
data; therefore, they have a special obligation to adopt and implement open
data policies. Building on the Open Data Watch pilot project to measure the
availability of data from NSOs, it is important to monitor how much data is made
available. Other sectoral assessments of data quality and availability should
include components on open data, drawing on shared definitions and metrics.
Measurement should remain high on the agenda for IODC 2016, including through
sessions within the Open Data Research Symposium.

5555
Taking Action
This report sets out a number of core areas for action and describes various specific
activities in which members of the IODC community are engaged. To move this agenda
forward many more individuals and organizations will need to be involved in action.
AttheclosingofIODC,delegateswereinvitedtotweettheirownactionsusingthe#iodc15
and #myaction hashtags. You can see examples of the actions that were shared here.
Consider how you might develop your own local or organizational action plan, or how you
might get involved in collaborative initiatives that can support delivery of this agenda.
You can share information about your own activities that deliver on this agenda at
www.opendatacon.org.
As we move towards the next International Open Data Conference in 2016 we will be
taking stock of progress against the actions discussed in this report. We hope that many
of you will add your voices and your efforts as we look toward IODC 2016 and beyond.
Through strong dedication and collaboration, we can ensure that the impacts of open
data are felt from the smallest local communities to the largest global institutions.
Some of the #myaction #iodc15 tweets...
#IODC15 #MyAction ensure open
data quick wins are a reality
My action(s): Commission/oversee case
studies on #opendata impact; read
wealth of reports articles published
recently #IODC15 #myaction
@opennorth’s#IODC15#myaction
involveshelpingononanglesofbest
practices-strivingforpossibleoverperfect.
#IODC15: #myAction is to bring diverse
accountability information+citizenship
rights groups into #openData convos at
local+national levels
James Saaka @NITAUgandaED
Laura Bacon @laurambacon
LiberatetheData@OpenDataBC
sumandro @ajantriks
4:20PM-29May2015
4:21PM-29May2015
4:31PM-29May2015
4:28PM-29May2015

5656
#iodc15 #myaction I’ll enhance the
use of #opendata also inside the city
organization
Helping scale out + up + deeper
the global #opendata community!
#IODC15 #MyAction
Tanja Lahti @TanjaLahti Open North @opennorth
4:27PM-29May2015 4:22PM-29May2015
#myaction from #IODC15 is to work
with @Morchickit to improve extend
this year’s #OpenData Index #IODC15
Assignsectorcodesandpolicymarkers
to@IDRC_CRDIprojectsaspartofits
commitmentto#IATI #IODC15#myaction
Andrew Stott @DirDigEng Mélanie Brunet @MelanieBrunet
4:19PM-29May2015 4:21PM-29May2015
#IODC15 #action to create a blog post
summarizing best ideas in #opendata
and #education #myaction
#IODC15 #myaction bring the journalists
on board to bring more value to
#OpenData and increase participation
Ignasi Alcalde @ignasialcalde Radu Puchiu @RaduPuchiu
4:22PM-29May2015 4:19PM-29May2015
Embeddingopendataintoour
e-governmentarchitecturemakingitthe
newbusinessasusualinthegovernment!
#IODC15#ourAction@myAction
#myaction #IODC15: contribuer à créer
réseau Francophonie pour partager
idées, ressources, expériences.
data.go.id @datagoid Yohanna Loucheur
@YohannaLoucheur
4:18PM-29May2015 4:18PM-29May2015

5757
ANNEXE
International Open Data Charter
You can find the full and final text of the International Open Data Charter at
www.opendatacharter.net

5858
Program Coordinators: Fernando Perini, Erik
Waddell, Tariq Khokhar, Michael Roberts
Report Editor: Tim Davies
Report Team: Tim Davies, Fernando
Perini, Heather McIntosh, Katie Clancy
Contributors: This report draws upon
session notes from the IODC Reporters
team, co-ordinated by Katie Clancy,
Ahmed Rashid, and Ana Brandusescu, and
with contributions from: Alannah Hilt,
Alessandro Gemmiti, Andrew Makus,
Augustine Kwok, Bibhu Prasad Nayak,
Bibhusan Bista, Carolina Pozo, David
Kyffin, Eko Prasetyo, Eva Constantaras,
Felipe Gonzalez, Iris Palma, Jazmin Acuña,
Jed Miller, Jonathan Lutes, Josef Hardi,
Laura Husak, Lynne McAvoy, Madeleine
McGreevy, Marie-Claude Côté, Matthew
McNaugton, Matthew Smith, Mélanie
Brunet, Oliana Valigura, Omenogo
Mejabi, Ricardo Matheus, Ruhiya Seward,
Samantha Custer, Savita Bailur, Sherwin
Ona, Silvana Fumega, Suhrob Niyozov,
Sumandro Chattapadhyay, Tanya Belleau,
Tavinder Nijhawan, and Zacahria Chiliswa.
Action Anchors: The agenda for action
was shaped by the contribution of the
IODC action anchors, co-ordinated
by Allison O’Beirne and Tim Davies,
and including: Ania Calderón, Barbara
Ubaldi, Beth Noveck, Bill Anderson,
Carla Bonina, Carlos Iglesias, Chris
Addison, Eric Swanson , Fabrizio
Scrollini, James McKinney, Joel Gurin,
José Alonso, Juan Pane, Liz Carolan,
Marcio Vasconcelos, Martin Parr,
Martin Tisné, Matthias Jaeger, Maurice
McNaughton, Mike Mora, Miko Canares,
Mor Rubinstein, Natalia Carfi, Philip
Ashlock, Sander Vanderwaal, Steve
Adler, Stephen Walker, Virginia Pardo,
Yasodara Córdova, Yohanna Loucheur,
and Zara Rahman.
Report Designer: Claudio Mendonca
Conference Team: We express our thanks
also to the whole conference organizing
team, and the hundreds of conference
participants whose contributions feature
within this report.
Acknowledgements

Enabling the Data Revolution

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Enabling the Data Revolution (20)

More from Teo Krawczyk (19)

Recently uploaded (20)

Enabling the Data Revolution