NAP Training Viet Nam - Session 6 Monitoring and Evaluation
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes1,308 views
The document outlines a training session focused on monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in the context of national adaptation plans (NAPs) for climate change. It covers the rationale for M&E, practical approaches, the development of indicators, and emphasizes that there is no one-size-fits-all solution for M&E systems. Key takeaways include the importance of being country-specific and utilizing existing information systems while ensuring clear purposes and responsibilities for M&E.
NAP Training Viet Nam - Session 6 Monitoring and Evaluation
- 1. Slide 1 National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Country-level training Supported By In cooperation with Session 6 M&E of Climate Change Adaptation and Linkage with NAP Process Presented by Nat Pinnoi, Ph.D. Private Sector Finance Specialist UNDP Bangkok Regional Hub
- 2. Slide 2 Overview of this module • Rationale of M&E in the context of the NAP process • Practical approaches for M&E • Lessons learnt: use M&E for learning and steering the NAP process from the beginning on
- 3. Slide 3 What can you expect to learn from this session? • Understand importance and challenges of M&E in the NAP process • Learn about different approaches and examples for M&E • Understand how to develop ‘good’ metrics / indicators and how to operationalize M&E
- 4. Slide 4 Content • Rationale for adaptation M&E • Purposes of M&E • How to develop an M&E system • What to measure / indicator development • Successful operation
- 5. Slide 5 Rationale for adaptation M&E • Understand what works well (and what doesn‘t) • Support management under uncertainty • Accountability for climate finance • Comply with national and international reporting
- 6. Slide 6 Uncertainty In climate and socio- economic development Long time horizon Success of adaptation only visible after extended timeframe Complexity Entanglement with social and economic stressors Context-dependent No universal indicator Challenges of adaptation M&E 16.01.2017 Context-dependent No universal indicator No one metric What to monitor? Which indicators to use?
- 7. Slide 7 What is the purpose of the M&E system? Broad spectrum of purposes, e.g.: • Monitor results-oriented implementation of adaptation actions and plans, e.g. for a country with a comprehensive planning framework • Monitor the NAP process itself, how it is progressing (but not the actual adaptation results) Two key take-away: • No one-size-fits-all solution for all purposes/contexts • 2. An adaptation M&E system does not necessarily need to be new and highly complex – it can rather build on existing information and monitoring systems
- 8. Slide 8 How to develop the adaptation M&E system Key message: Be country specific. There is no one- size-fits-all solution. Key message: Bring methods (e.g. result chain, VA) in line with purpose Key message: Get inspiration from indicator repository but tailor to specific context. Key message: Set realistic timelines for development of M&E system. Key message: Ensure reflection at policy and decision-making level.
- 9. Slide 9 Results chain IF THEN ELSE … Risk Management
- 10. Slide 10 Indicator development: monitoring areas 16.01.2017 •No. of people @ risk from flooding •% of households with safe drinking water •Expected intensity of floods Example: Flooding Indicators should comply with the SMART rule: be S: Specific M: Measurable A: Attainable (targets) R: Relevant T: Time-bound
- 11. Slide 11 Example of a method for adaptation M&E: results chain 16.01.2017 •Funds provided for training •No. of small scale dams under operation •Wheat yield of small farmers per year. •Annual income of small farmers per year.
- 12. Slide 12 Key tips for a successful M&E development – I • Clarify purpose: be clear about what M&E is done for (purpose), how its results should be used and by whom • Designate clear responsibilities for collecting data, analysis and reporting • Limit complexity of your indicator system: focus on those areas which you consider most relevant
- 13. Slide 13 Key tips for a successful M&E development – II • Use as much as possible existing data sources and monitoring systems. Relevant questions: • What data and information are being collected already by other M&E frameworks (e.g. from agriculture, water, health, economic development etc.) and are relevant for M&E of adaptation? • Which already existing data sources refer to CC impacts, vulnerabilities, adaptation outputs and outcomes, etc.? • What could be done to make other data relevant for adaptation M&E – potentially through adjustments?
- 14. Slide 14 Exercise: define key areas for monitoring/drafting indicator/Institution Setting to do M&E Item to be Mornitored Measurable Indicators Responsible person/entity Frequency Resource Required Potential Risk Risk Mitigation Measures Output Outcome
- 16. Slide 16 Example of results chain
Editor's Notes
- #2: Country teams that want to realize key NAP tasks need to have a good understanding of the NAP concept This module familiarizes with the general concept and character of the NAP process
- #3: Provide an overview of the content of the presentation, starting with “Objectives of the module” (see next slide). If you find it useful, you may use this field to insert notes – but only sparingly, please!!
- #4: List two to four learning objectives of the module. What would you like each participant to know and be able to do when he/she has completed the module? Make the participants clearly understand the intended learning outcome and the relevance of the topic.
- #6: 5
- #7: Key message: The main challenges are mentioned here and will be explained / explored in the following slides.
- #9: Download a repository of national-level adaptation M&E indicators on AdaptationCommunity.net: https://gc21.giz.de/ibt/var/app/wp342deP/1443/index.php/knowledge/monitoring-evaluation/national-level-me/
- #11: Attention for presenter: The term ‚Impacts‘ might refer to impacts by climate change as well as to impacts by the NAP (results). To clearly distinguish the two different areas, the former is called impact in the slide, the latter response / results. The presenter should briefly point to this potential source of misunderstanding.
- #12: Source: WIR/GIZ (2011): Making adaptation count.
- #13: Further reading: https://gc21.giz.de/ibt/var/app/wp342deP/1443/wp-content/uploads/filebase/me/me-guides-manuals-reports/GIZ-2013_Recommendations_for_adaptation_MaE_in_practice.pdf
- #14: Further reading: https://gc21.giz.de/ibt/var/app/wp342deP/1443/wp-content/uploads/filebase/me/me-guides-manuals-reports/GIZ-2013_Recommendations_for_adaptation_MaE_in_practice.pdf