SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Analysing and evaluating
written texts


TAD1101 Assessment Task 1
  This presentation has an audio track – please use
              headphones or speakers
Today
 How you will be assessed
 Understanding the task
 Understanding the question
 Communicating your response
 Common issues
What you need to understand

 1. In “Scopic regimes of modernity” (in Hal Foster,
  ed., Vision and Visuality, Bay Press, 1988) Martin Jay
  explores different approaches to vision and visuality in
  Renaissance and Baroque visual cultures. Identify and
  explore key concerns in his argument through a critical
  analysis of two of the following artworks.
 2. In her book Window Shopping (MIT Press, 1994), Anne
  Friedberg argues that the visual cultures of modernity,
  particularly from the mid to late 19th century, encouraged a
  "mobilized gaze". Identify and explore key concerns in her
  argument through a critical analysis of two of the following
  artworks, media attractions and/or design artefacts.

                                             What you need to do
How you will be assessed
How well you:
 Demonstrate your understanding of the task
 Demonstrate your understanding of the question
  – By identifying key arguments within the written text
  – By selecting and evaluating visual material in relation to arguments
    and concepts
 Integrate visual and textual analysis to produce an argument
 Communicate your response
 Reference
UNDERSTAND THE TASK
The task is to identify and comprehend
 the arguments of a set reading and apply
    them to examples. This task and the
feedback you receive in the assessment will
 help you to develop skills in analysing and
    evaluating written texts and relevant
 examples of visual culture; and to express
         your ideas in written form.
Task Unpacked
 “Identify and explore key concerns in his/her
  argument through a critical analysis of two of the
  following artworks (media attractions and/or design
  artefacts)”.
    1. Identify and critically comprehend the authors
       position (arguments)
    2. Analyse and evaluate the authors arguments
    3. Demonstrate your understanding by applying those
       arguments to examples
    4. Express in YOUR words
UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION
Questions Unpacked
 Jay explores different approaches to vision and
  visuality in Renaissance and Baroque visual
  cultures
 Freidberg argues that the visual cultures of
  modernity, particularly from the mid to late
  19th century, encouraged a "mobilized gaze".
 Make a glossary – these words are useful
INTEGRATE VISUAL AND
TEXTUAL ANALYSIS TO
PRODUCE THE ARGUMENT
Apply the arguments to the examples
 Analyse and evaluate the artworks
 Apply the arguments from the written text
 Express your ideas




                      !!COMMON ISSUE!!
                      Making big statements
   •   Do make a direct connection between the points from the text and the
       artworks
   •   Don’t simply give lots of general facts rather than examples of specific
       elements.
   •   Don’t make sweeping, unsubstantiated statements
   •   Do demonstrate a close reading of the selected artworks
   •   ‘About-ness’ is not an essay
CITING
Turabian style
For more information see the
Citing and Referencing
Library Guide
http://guides.lib.monash.edu/content.php?pid
=346637&sid=2835489




                                               Caulfield Library
                                               808.02 T929M 2007
REFLECT ON YOUR WORK
How well did you:
 Demonstrate your                    Critically analyse key
  understanding of the task?           arguments and concepts
                                       in the text?
 Demonstrate your
  understanding of the question       Critically analyse visual
                                       material?
  – By identifying key arguments
    within the written text?          Integrate visual and
  – By selecting and evaluating        textual analysis to
    visual material in relation to     produce the argument?
    arguments and concepts?           Communicate your
 Argue your position?                 response?
                                      Reference?
Needs Improvement
                        High Distinction (HD)                  Distinction (D)                 Credit ©              Pass (P)
                                                                                                                                                       (N)
                        Evidence of an in-depth                                                Demonstrates good     Demonstrates some                 Little or no
Understands the                                                Evidence that all aspects of
                        understanding of all aspects of the                                    understanding of      understanding of aspects of       understanding of the
task.                                                          the task were well-considered
                        task.                                                                  the task overall..    the task, but not all.            task

                        Sophisticated understanding of the                                     Good
Understands the                                                                                                      Some understanding of the
                        question and well-considered           Sound understanding of the      understanding of                                        Little or no
question and selects                                                                                                 question but does not show
                        identification of appropriate          question with appropriate       the question and                                        understanding of the
appropriate visual                                                                                                   evidence of how and why
                        materials.                             materials well identified..     selection of                                            question.
and textual material.                                                                                                materials are selected.
                                                                                               materials.

                                                                                                                                                       Little or no evidence
Identifies key                                                                                 Arguments are
                        Arguments are evaluated in an          Arguments in the reading are                          Arguments are identified but      that arguments have
arguments within                                                                               identified but not
                        independent and in-depth manner.       soundly evaluated                                     not evaluated.                    been identified and/or
the written text.                                                                              evaluated in depth.
                                                                                                                                                       evaluated.
Selects and
                                                                                               Some evidence that                                      Visual material does
evaluates visual        Clear evidence that relations          Clear evidence that visual                            Little evidence that visual
                                                                                               visual material has                                     not appear to have
material in relation    between text and visual material       material has been evaluated                           material is evaluated in relation
                                                                                               been selected in                                        been evaluated in
to arguments and        have been thoroughly considered.       in relation to text.                                  to text.
                                                                                               relation to text.                                       relation to the text.
concepts.
                        Very well-developed and structured     Logical and well-structured
Argues in an                                                                                   Sound structure for   Some structure but lapses in      Little or no evidence of
                        argument                               argument
effective manner.                                                                              argument.             clarity and logic.                a structured argument

Critically analyses
                        Sophisticated analysis of the key                                      Good analysis of                                        Does not adequately
key arguments and                                              Very good analysis.                                   Analysis needs development.
                        text.                                                                  the key text                                            undertake analysis.
concepts in the text.

                                                               Visual material is well         Good analysis but
Critically analyses     Sophisticated analysis used to                                                               Some analysis but is not          Little or no visual
                                                               analysed and analysis is        is not developed
visual material.        support arguments and contentions                                                            developed effectively .           analysis.
                                                               used quite effectively.         effectively
                                                                                                                                                       Does not integrate
Integrates visual and                                                                          Sound analysis with   Visual and textual analysis are
                        Sophisticated integration of visual                                                                                            visual and textual
textual analysis to                                            Well integrated to produce an   some integration to   evident but are not well
                        and textual analysis to produce an                                                                                             analysis into a
produce the                                                    informed argument..             develop the           developed for the purposes of
                        independent argument.                                                                                                          response to the
argument                                                                                       argument.             the argument.
                                                                                                                                                       question.
                        Highly developed skills in written                                                                                             Inadequate spelling and
Communicates in a                                              Well-developed skills in        Solid expression.     Adequate written expression
                        expression with an independent                                                                                                 grammar and/or
effective and                                                  written expression. Clear,      Generally clear but
                        voice that effectively positions                                                                                               inappropriate language
appropriate manner.                                            concise and coherent..          with some lapses.
                        analysis and arguments..                                                                                                       to an academic context.

                                                                                               Solid understanding                                     Little to no adherence
                                                               Very sound understanding        and use of                                              to scholarly
References              Thorough understanding and use of                                                            Some misunderstanding of
                                                               and use of scholarly            scholarly                                               conventions of
thoroughly.             scholarly conventions of referencing                                                         referencing conventions
                                                               conventions of referencing      conventions of                                          referencing.
                                                                                               referencing
More Information
• Critical analysis
  – http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/onlib/critrev.html
  – http://www.deakin.edu.au/current-
    students/study-support/study-
    skills/handouts/critical-analysis.php
• Visual Analysis
• Monash Language and Learning Online
  – http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/a
    rtdesign/writing/1.xml

More Related Content

PDF
Essay guidelines
PPT
Digital citizenship
DOC
Fs1.episode1. sarah jane cabilino
PPTX
Assessment techniques overview
DOC
Fs1.episode2 sarah jane cabilino
DOC
Lesson plan 2.1 syllabus of english class x smt 1 & 2
DOC
Lesson plan 2.2 syllabus of english class xi smt 1 & 2
DOC
Lesson plan 2.3 syllabus of english class xii smt 1 & 2
Essay guidelines
Digital citizenship
Fs1.episode1. sarah jane cabilino
Assessment techniques overview
Fs1.episode2 sarah jane cabilino
Lesson plan 2.1 syllabus of english class x smt 1 & 2
Lesson plan 2.2 syllabus of english class xi smt 1 & 2
Lesson plan 2.3 syllabus of english class xii smt 1 & 2

What's hot (12)

DOC
Syllabus complete
PDF
2012 ACBSP Region 4 Best of Regions Presentation Rubric
DOCX
Fs 2 episode 4
PDF
Assessments & Rubrics PD 2.22.13
DOC
Unidad 2
PPTX
Cognitive ethnography
PDF
Australian Visions Unit of work
DOCX
Prosposed final report card
PDF
Subject Access to Art Works: Issues and the CONA Example
PDF
Drafting unit plan
PPS
Lesson 17
PPTX
Rbt with zen
Syllabus complete
2012 ACBSP Region 4 Best of Regions Presentation Rubric
Fs 2 episode 4
Assessments & Rubrics PD 2.22.13
Unidad 2
Cognitive ethnography
Australian Visions Unit of work
Prosposed final report card
Subject Access to Art Works: Issues and the CONA Example
Drafting unit plan
Lesson 17
Rbt with zen
Ad

Similar to TAD1101 Task 1 Guide (20)

DOC
Rubric2
PDF
Case study evaluation rubric
PPTX
English 2 8-12
PDF
Rubric Task
PPTX
Curriculum Mapping – Mrs. Ashok
PPTX
Motivation, Engagement & Assessment
PDF
Step back to readings
DOC
Blog rubric french blogs
DOC
Written Communication Rubric
PPTX
Pamantasan ng lungsod ng valenzuela bsed f il 3-1 2013 4
DOC
Algebra i final project district guidelines
PPSX
Visual Tools for Teaching College /Career-Readiness Standards
PDF
Oral Presentations Rubric
PDF
Oral Presentation Rubric
PPT
Introduction to Rubrics
PDF
Emo Essay Rubric and Feedback Checklist
PDF
Bloom revisedtaxonomy keywords-1-1
PDF
Oral presentation rubric2
RTF
Midterm presentation rubric
Rubric2
Case study evaluation rubric
English 2 8-12
Rubric Task
Curriculum Mapping – Mrs. Ashok
Motivation, Engagement & Assessment
Step back to readings
Blog rubric french blogs
Written Communication Rubric
Pamantasan ng lungsod ng valenzuela bsed f il 3-1 2013 4
Algebra i final project district guidelines
Visual Tools for Teaching College /Career-Readiness Standards
Oral Presentations Rubric
Oral Presentation Rubric
Introduction to Rubrics
Emo Essay Rubric and Feedback Checklist
Bloom revisedtaxonomy keywords-1-1
Oral presentation rubric2
Midterm presentation rubric
Ad

TAD1101 Task 1 Guide

  • 1. Analysing and evaluating written texts TAD1101 Assessment Task 1 This presentation has an audio track – please use headphones or speakers
  • 2. Today  How you will be assessed  Understanding the task  Understanding the question  Communicating your response  Common issues
  • 3. What you need to understand  1. In “Scopic regimes of modernity” (in Hal Foster, ed., Vision and Visuality, Bay Press, 1988) Martin Jay explores different approaches to vision and visuality in Renaissance and Baroque visual cultures. Identify and explore key concerns in his argument through a critical analysis of two of the following artworks.  2. In her book Window Shopping (MIT Press, 1994), Anne Friedberg argues that the visual cultures of modernity, particularly from the mid to late 19th century, encouraged a "mobilized gaze". Identify and explore key concerns in her argument through a critical analysis of two of the following artworks, media attractions and/or design artefacts. What you need to do
  • 4. How you will be assessed How well you:  Demonstrate your understanding of the task  Demonstrate your understanding of the question – By identifying key arguments within the written text – By selecting and evaluating visual material in relation to arguments and concepts  Integrate visual and textual analysis to produce an argument  Communicate your response  Reference
  • 6. The task is to identify and comprehend the arguments of a set reading and apply them to examples. This task and the feedback you receive in the assessment will help you to develop skills in analysing and evaluating written texts and relevant examples of visual culture; and to express your ideas in written form.
  • 7. Task Unpacked  “Identify and explore key concerns in his/her argument through a critical analysis of two of the following artworks (media attractions and/or design artefacts)”. 1. Identify and critically comprehend the authors position (arguments) 2. Analyse and evaluate the authors arguments 3. Demonstrate your understanding by applying those arguments to examples 4. Express in YOUR words
  • 9. Questions Unpacked  Jay explores different approaches to vision and visuality in Renaissance and Baroque visual cultures  Freidberg argues that the visual cultures of modernity, particularly from the mid to late 19th century, encouraged a "mobilized gaze".  Make a glossary – these words are useful
  • 10. INTEGRATE VISUAL AND TEXTUAL ANALYSIS TO PRODUCE THE ARGUMENT
  • 11. Apply the arguments to the examples  Analyse and evaluate the artworks  Apply the arguments from the written text  Express your ideas !!COMMON ISSUE!! Making big statements • Do make a direct connection between the points from the text and the artworks • Don’t simply give lots of general facts rather than examples of specific elements. • Don’t make sweeping, unsubstantiated statements • Do demonstrate a close reading of the selected artworks • ‘About-ness’ is not an essay
  • 13. Turabian style For more information see the Citing and Referencing Library Guide http://guides.lib.monash.edu/content.php?pid =346637&sid=2835489 Caulfield Library 808.02 T929M 2007
  • 15. How well did you:  Demonstrate your  Critically analyse key understanding of the task? arguments and concepts in the text?  Demonstrate your understanding of the question  Critically analyse visual material? – By identifying key arguments within the written text?  Integrate visual and – By selecting and evaluating textual analysis to visual material in relation to produce the argument? arguments and concepts?  Communicate your  Argue your position? response?  Reference?
  • 16. Needs Improvement High Distinction (HD) Distinction (D) Credit © Pass (P) (N) Evidence of an in-depth Demonstrates good Demonstrates some Little or no Understands the Evidence that all aspects of understanding of all aspects of the understanding of understanding of aspects of understanding of the task. the task were well-considered task. the task overall.. the task, but not all. task Sophisticated understanding of the Good Understands the Some understanding of the question and well-considered Sound understanding of the understanding of Little or no question and selects question but does not show identification of appropriate question with appropriate the question and understanding of the appropriate visual evidence of how and why materials. materials well identified.. selection of question. and textual material. materials are selected. materials. Little or no evidence Identifies key Arguments are Arguments are evaluated in an Arguments in the reading are Arguments are identified but that arguments have arguments within identified but not independent and in-depth manner. soundly evaluated not evaluated. been identified and/or the written text. evaluated in depth. evaluated. Selects and Some evidence that Visual material does evaluates visual Clear evidence that relations Clear evidence that visual Little evidence that visual visual material has not appear to have material in relation between text and visual material material has been evaluated material is evaluated in relation been selected in been evaluated in to arguments and have been thoroughly considered. in relation to text. to text. relation to text. relation to the text. concepts. Very well-developed and structured Logical and well-structured Argues in an Sound structure for Some structure but lapses in Little or no evidence of argument argument effective manner. argument. clarity and logic. a structured argument Critically analyses Sophisticated analysis of the key Good analysis of Does not adequately key arguments and Very good analysis. Analysis needs development. text. the key text undertake analysis. concepts in the text. Visual material is well Good analysis but Critically analyses Sophisticated analysis used to Some analysis but is not Little or no visual analysed and analysis is is not developed visual material. support arguments and contentions developed effectively . analysis. used quite effectively. effectively Does not integrate Integrates visual and Sound analysis with Visual and textual analysis are Sophisticated integration of visual visual and textual textual analysis to Well integrated to produce an some integration to evident but are not well and textual analysis to produce an analysis into a produce the informed argument.. develop the developed for the purposes of independent argument. response to the argument argument. the argument. question. Highly developed skills in written Inadequate spelling and Communicates in a Well-developed skills in Solid expression. Adequate written expression expression with an independent grammar and/or effective and written expression. Clear, Generally clear but voice that effectively positions inappropriate language appropriate manner. concise and coherent.. with some lapses. analysis and arguments.. to an academic context. Solid understanding Little to no adherence Very sound understanding and use of to scholarly References Thorough understanding and use of Some misunderstanding of and use of scholarly scholarly conventions of thoroughly. scholarly conventions of referencing referencing conventions conventions of referencing conventions of referencing. referencing
  • 17. More Information • Critical analysis – http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/onlib/critrev.html – http://www.deakin.edu.au/current- students/study-support/study- skills/handouts/critical-analysis.php • Visual Analysis • Monash Language and Learning Online – http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/a rtdesign/writing/1.xml

Editor's Notes

  • #14: The Turabian style is a citing and referencing system based on the Chicago style - it is named after Kate Turabian from the University of Chicago who authored a manual to guide students in citing and referencing when writing research papers.You can find copies of this manual in the Monash University Library.There are two different ways Turabian referencing can be done. The one you will be using is the Notes / Bibiography footnote system. Notes may be either at the foot of each page (footnotes).