Tōhoku 
earthquake 
JAPAN 2011 
GYANENDRA PRAKASH 
13526015 
(STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS)
INTRODUCTION 
 Also known as the GREAT EAST JAPAN 
EARTHQUAKE and the 3.11 
EARTHQUAKE. 
 It is the most powerful EQ ever recorded in 
JAPAN and fifth most powerful in the world 
since 1900. 
 Led to tsunami waves, flooding, landslides, 
fires, building & infrastructure damage, 
nuclear incidents, etc.
EQ CHARACTERISTICS 
TYPE UNDERSEA MEGATHRUST 
MOMENT MAGNITUDE 9.0 
SEISMIC MOMENT 0.332×1030 dyne-cm 
ENERGY RELEASED 1.9 ± 0.5×1017 joules 
TIME 14:46:23JST (05:46 GMT) 
DAY/DATE FRIDAY/11-03-2011 
EPICENTER 70KM (43.5mi) east of Tōhoku 
38.322°N 142.369°E 
HYPOCENTER 30KM (18.6 mi) underwater 
DURATION 6 minutes 
MAX. INTENSITY IX 
PGA 2.93g (USGS) 
MAX. TSUNAMI RUNUP 
HEIGHT 
37.88 m at MIYAKO
DAMAGE & EFFECTS 
ATLEAST 
 15,703 people killed 
 4,647 missing, 5,314 injured and 130,927 
displaced 
 1,800 houses destroyed when dam failed in 
FUKUSHIMA 
 332,395 buildings, 2,126 roads, 56 bridges and 
26 railways destroyed or damaged by EQ and 
TSUNAMI.
 The tsunami caused nuclear accidents, 
primarily the level 7 meltdowns at three 
reactors in the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear 
Power Plant. 
 Matsushima Air Field of the Japan Self- 
Defense Force in Miyagi Prefecture was struck 
by the tsunami, flooding the base and resulting 
in damage to all 18 Mitsubishi F-2 fighter jets of 
the 21st Fighter Training Squadron. 
 US$235 billion economic losses had been 
experienced as per the World Bank's estimate 
making it the costliest natural disaster in world 
history.
GEOLOGY & TECTONICS 
 This earthquake occurred where the Pacific 
Plate is subducting under the plate beneath 
northern Honshu. 
 The Pacific plate, which moves at a rate of 8 
to 9 cm (3.1 to 3.5 in) per year, dips under 
Honshu's underlying plate building large 
amounts of elastic energy. This motion 
pushes the upper plate down until the 
accumulated stress causes a seismic slip-rupture 
event.
FOCAL MECHANISM 
 STRIKE= 193° 
 DIP= 14° 
 RAKE= 81° 
(JMA epicenter 
considered)
SLIP DISTRIBUTION 
 The largest asperity 
developed near the 
epicenter at 5-25 km 
in depth (Asperity I), 
one asperity located 
in the deep 
subduction zone 
beneath the 
hypocenter at about 
45 km in depth 
(Asperity II).
 The other two secondary asperities 
occurred in the north and south from the 
hypocenter and both were centered at 
about 10 km in depth (Asperity III and 
Asperity IV). 
 The slip of the largest asperity is over 30 m 
with a predominantely reverse motion and 
covers a very large area of about 160x120 
km2. The slips of asperity II, III and IV are 
smaller and are about 20 m in average.
RUPTURE PROCESS 
 At the beginning,the 
rupture velocity near 
the hypocenter was 
initially about 1.0 
km/s. 
 But it increased 
rapidly to 5.3 km/s at 
shallow part 
(Asperity I) after 
about 45 second.
 During 45 to 60 second, the rupture looked 
like over the velocity of shear wave that 
became a supershear rupture. Almost at the 
same period, the rupture propagated to the 
north also found a supershear rupture 
behavior between 75 and 90 second. 
 The rupture velocities rapidly decreased to 
about 0.2-0.5 km/s and didn’t indicate 
significant change in both the north and 
south. 
 The rupture front almost stopped until about 
165 second.
 After 160 seconds, the rupture front began 
to move south in the shallow subduction 
zone along the Japan Trench with a rupture 
velocity of approximately 2.0 km/s until the 
end of the rupture.
MOMENT RATE FUNCTION 
 0-40 seconds is 
related to the 
occurrence of the 
rupture nucleation. 
 40-90 seconds 
includes the growth of 
the biggest asperity 
(Asperity I) at shallow 
part above the 
hypocenter.
 the deep part of the fault began to rupture 
between about 100 and 160 seconds, 
resulting in the deep asperity (Asperity II) 
beneath the hypocenter. 
 The shallow portion of the fault began to slip 
toward the north (Asperity III) and south after 
160 seconds. 
 The last release of seismic energy after about 
180 to 240 seconds was caused by the slip 
that ruptured to the southern area along the 
Japan Trench (Asperity IV). 
 The overall duration time of the main rupture 
was about 240 seconds.
FORESHOCKS & AFTERSHOCKS 
 7 foreshocks and 10,583 aftershocks have 
been experienced till now. 
 The first major foreshock was a 
7.2 MW event on 9 March, approximately 
40 km (25 mi) from the epicenter of the 11 
March earthquake, with another three on 
the same day in excess of 6.0 MW. 
 Over eight hundred aftershocks of 
magnitude 4.5 MW or greater have 
occurred since the initial quake.
INTENSITY 
 North-eastern 
part of 
Honshu 
was 
severely 
affected 
(based on 
JMA 
scale).
TSUNAMI 
 The earthquake 
triggered 
powerful tsunami 
waves that 
reached heights of 
up to 37.88 metres 
in Miyako in 
Tōhoku's Iwate 
Prefecture, and 
which, in the 
Sendai area, 
travelled up to 
10 km inland.
TSUNAMI HEIGHTS OBSERVED 
AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS
GEOPHYSICAL EFFECTS 
 The earthquake moved Honshu 2.4 m (8 ft) 
east. 
 The Earth's axis shifted by estimates of 
between 10 cm (4 in) and 25 cm (10 in). 
 The speed of the Earth's rotation increased, 
shortening the day by 1.8 microseconds 
due to the redistribution of Earth's mass.
THANK YOU
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
 Over 18,600 persons are 
reported to be dead and 
over 167,000 injured. 
 The estimated economic 
loss due to this quake is 
placed at around 
Rs.22,000 Crores.
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Major earthquakes around the world
Kobe Earthquake1995 
JAPAN 
Presented by 
Vijay kumar & Ahmed Bilal 
M.Tech. Str Dyn 
E No-135260 - 31 & 04
At 05:46 a.m JST,On Tuesday 17 Jan 1995, A magnitude-7.2(JMA) 
Earthquake Struck Kobe region of South-Central Japan. 
Kobe is 20 km from quake center
Where did it 
happen? 
Epicenter was located in the 
Akashi strait north of Awaji Island 
in Osaka Bay some 20km from 
Kobe city. The Focus was 22km 
beneath the Nojima Fault. 
Akashi Strait 
Osaka Bay
Why did it happen? 
Kobe lies on the Nojima Fault, 
above a destructive plate margin. 
Here the heavier, oceanic philipine 
plate is forced under the lighter 
continental eurasian plate. Sudden 
movement of the fault caused this 
major earthquake. 
Nojima 
Fault 
Philipine plate subducted beneath the Eurasian plate
How it happened? 
The earthquake 
generated along the 
intersection of 
the Nojima fault with 
the Suma fault, 16 
kilometres below the 
Akashi strait, 20 
kilometres to the west of 
the city. 
The main shake was 
preceded by a series of 
weak trembles, 
registered only by the 
seismometer in Osaka, 
then for 14 to 20 
seconds earth trembled 
reaching a magnitude of 
7.2 after Richter (6.9 
according to the 
Japanese intensity scale 
- shindo,
Fault Plane/Fault Model 
Focal Mechanism 
Solution 
Epicenter 
Fig.1. Fault model of Yoshida et al. (1996) for the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Two rectangles represent the surface projections of the 
fault segments and thick lines indicate their shallower sides. The solid star with a focal mechanism solution is the epicenter of the 
main shock determined by Katao et al. (1997), and gray lines are active fault traces, after KOKETSU et al. 1998.
Why Japan has large potential for Earthquakes ?? 
1500 EQs/Year 
1. Tokyo is situated on Japan’s main Honshu island which in turn sits at the 
intersection of three continental plates, the Eurasian, Pacific and Philippine 
Sea plates, which are slowly grinding against each other, building up 
enormous seismic pressure. Most of the largest and strongest earthquakes in 
Japan are caused by subduction of the Philippine Sea Plate or Pacific Plate, 
with mechanisms that involve either energy released within the subducting 
plate or the accumulation and sudden release of stress in the overlying plate. 
2. Japan lies along the Pacific Ring of Fire, a narrow zone around the Pacific 
Ocean where a large chunk of Earth's earthquakes and volcanic eruptions 
occur. Roughly 90 percent of all the world's earthquakes and 80 percent of the 
largest ones strike along the Ring of Fire. 
3. Japan accounts for about 20 per cent of the world's earthquakes of magnitude 
six or greater and on average, an earthquake occurs there every five minutes.
Earthquake Details 
Date-Time Tuesday, January 17, 1995 at 20:46:52 GMT at epicenter. 
Epicenter Location 3 4 . 5 8 ° N (Latitude), 135.01°E(Longitude),Located in the Akashi 
strait north of Awaji Island some 20km from Kobe city. 
Focal depth 22 km (13.67 miles) set by location program (Depth of Focus) 
Fault Descriptions Nojima Fault (Length = 23 km, Width = 13km) ( right-lateral 
strike-slip fault with a reverse component present at destructive 
plate boundary) 
Location 
Uncertainty 
horizontal +/- 3.4 km (2.1 miles); depth fixed by location program 
It was an Intra-plate inland shallow earthquake. 
Magnitude 
ML=6.9 (on Richter Scale) and ML=7.2 (Japan Meteorological 
Agency Scale) 
Maximum Intensity VII (Local)
Maximum Surface 
Displacements 
1-1.5 m right-lateral, 1.7m horizontal and 1 m vertical (observed) 
Seismic Rupture 
Length 
Between 30km to 50km long and 15 km wide (bilateral rupture 
from the hypocenter, (Pitarka et al., 1995; Kikuchi, 1999) 
Seismic Moment 2.5x1026 dyne-cm (Mw 6.9) with a source duration of 6 to 10 
seconds (Kikuchi, 1995) 
Human Loss 6000 deaths, 30000 injuries, 300000 homeless 
Economic Loss 200 billion dollars (estimated) 
Infrastructure 
Damaged 
150000 Buildings Damaged, Many roadways,Bridges destroyed. 
Peak Ground 
Acceleration 
0.5g to 0.8g (10 sites estimation) 
Peak Ground 
Velocity 
50-175 cm/s 
Duration of 
Rupture and 
Faulting 
20 Seconds 
Foreshocks and 
Aftershocks 
Four foreshocks, beginning with the largest (Mj 3.7) at 18:28 on 
the previous day. Within five weeks, about 50 aftershocks at Mj 
4.0 or greater were observed.
Instrumental 
Intensity 
According to Japanese 
Standards, Highest level 
7 on the scale 
constructed by the 
Japan Meteorological 
Agency (JMA) occurred 
in Kobe.
Isoseismal map depicting regions of strong shaking
Peak Ground 
Acceleration 
Max Recorded = 0.8g
Distribution of PGA
Peak Ground 
Velocity 
Max Reached= 175cm/s
Uncertainty 
Decorated 
Bare 
Other Shake Maps Provided by US Geological Survey
Earthquake Effects 
The aftermath of the Great Hanshin earthquake can be divided into primary and 
secondary effects. 
The primary effects included the destruction of 150,000 
buildings, the collapse of 1 km of the Hanshin Expressway, 
the destruction of 120 of the 150 quays in the port of Kobe, 
and fires which took over large portions of the city. 
Secondary effects included some disruption of the 
electricity supply. Residents of Kobe were also afraid to 
return home because of the aftershocks that lasted several 
days (74 of which were strong enough to be felt).
Economic Impact 
• The Great Hanshin earthquake caused over ten trillion yen 
($102.5 billion) in damage, or 2.5% of Japan’s GDP at the time. 
• Most of the losses were completely uninsured, as only 3% of 
property in the Kobe area was covered by earthquake insurance, 
as compared to 16% in Tokyo. 
• The earthquake destroyed most of the facilities of what were then 
the world’s 6th largest container port and the source of nearly 40% 
of Kobe’s industrial output. 
• The magnitude of the earthquake alone caused a major decline in 
Japanese stock markets, with the Nikkei 225 index plunging by 
1,025 points on the day following the earthquake.
Failure of the first (soft)storey caused partial collapse of upper stories
Hanshin(Kobe) Expressway suffered severe 
damage 
Ten spans of the Hanshin 
Expressway Route 43 in 
three distinct locations in 
Kobe and Nishinomiya were 
completely toppled over, 
blocking a key link that 
carried 40% of Osaka-Kobe 
road traffic. About half of the 
elevated expressway’s piers 
were damaged in some way. 
Cause: Severe Liquefaction due to Strong Ground 
Motion
Damage to highways and subways : Kobe Expressway
Leaning Sakagami Building. 
(Feb. 1995)
Mid-story collapse, Kobe 
earthquake
Ports in Kobe 
Damaged quay walls and 
port facilities on Rokko 
Island. Quay walls have 
been pushed outward by 2 
to 3 meters with 3 to 4 
meters deep depressed 
areas called grabens 
forming behind the walls, 
Kobe 1995
Lateral displacement of a quay wall on Port Island, Kobe 1995
Building Collapse
Fractured Road, Japan 
 A crane and several 
construction vehicles 
lay toppled on a 
fractured road in Kobe, 
Japan, after a 7.2- 
magnitude temblor 
shook the quake-prone 
country. The Great 
Hanshin Earthquake 
Disaster of 1995 was 
one of the worst in 
Japan’s history, killing 
6,433 people and 
causing more than 
$100 billion in 
damages.
Twisted Railroad, 
Japan 
A steel-fortified railroad lies 
twisted like a toy after a 7.2- 
magnitude earthquake 
rocked Kobe, Japan, in 
1995. The earthquake was 
the biggest to hit Japan in 
47 years and shook the city 
for 20 seconds.
Lateral spreading caused 1.2-2 meter drop of paved surface 
and local flooding, Kobe 1995.
Retaining wall damage and lateral spreading, Kobe 1995
Damages to bridges that cross rivers and other bodies of water due to 
liquefaction during Kobe Earthquake. 
Note: Liquefaction only occurs in saturated soil, its effects are most 
commonly observed in low-lying areas near bodies of water such 
as rivers, lakes, bays, and oceans.
Liquefaction induced soil movements pushed the foundations out of 
place to the point where bridge spans loose support (above) or are 
compressed to the point of buckling during Kobe Earthquake.
For Further Detailed Information 
• http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/events/1995_01_16.php [USGS Link] 
• www.terrapub.co.jp/journals/EPS/pdf/5010/50100803.pdf 
• http://historyofgeology.fieldofscience.com/2011/01/17-january-1995-great-kobe-earthquake.html 
• http://www.ce.washington.edu/~liquefaction/html/where/where1.html [Pictures Link] 
• http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8375788/Japan-earthquake-what-causes-them. 
html 
• http://www.geerassociation.org/GEER_Post%20EQ%20Reports/Kobe_1995/ch2-6.html 
[Strong Ground Motion Reports] 
Website Links 
Reference Books & Papers 
• A fault model of the 1995 Kobe earthquake derived from the GPS data on the Akashi 
Kaikyo Bridge and other datasets: Kazuki Koketsu, Shingo Yoshida, and Hiromichi 
Higashihara, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo ,Japan. 
• National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 901. The January 
17,1995 Kobe Earthquake ,Performance of Structures. 
• Geotechnical Reconnaissance of the Effects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu 
Earthquake, Japan, Report No. UCB/EERC-95/01 Earthquake Engineering Research Center 
College of Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, United States of America.
Thank You
1897 ASSAM EARTHQUAKE 
Presented By: 
DHANASHREE BANKAR 
13526009 
DEPARTMENT OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING 
INDIAN INSTITTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE 
ROORKEE 
Submitted to : 
Dr. M. L. 
Sharma
INTRODUCTION 
 NORTH-EASTERN REGION- EARTHQUAKE 
PRONE REGION 
 ZONE V 
 INDIAN PLATE DIVING IN EURASIAN PLATE 
 STATE IS UNDERLAIN BY SEVERAL THRUST 
(MBT, MCT, HFF AND NAGA THRUST) 
 TWO MAJOR EARTHQUAKES OF MAGNITUDE 
8.7 AND 8.6 OCCURRED IN 1897 AND 1950 
RESPECTIVELY.
1897 ASSAM EARTHQUAKE 
 DATE- JUNE 12, 1897 
 TIME- 5:11 PM 
 LOCATION- RANGJOLI, ASSAM 
 LATTITUDE- 25.5N LONGITUTUDE 
91.00E 
 MAGNITUDE- 8.7(RICHTER SCALE) 
 MOMENT MAGNITUDE- 8 
 EPICENTRE- 14 KM ESE OF 
SANGSIT (MEGHALAYA)
TECTONICS OF EARTHQUAKE 
 SOUTH-SOUTH-WEST DIPPING 
REVERSE OF OLDHAM FAULT 
 CHEDRANG AND SAMIN FAULT 
 MINIMUM DISPLACEMENT ON THE 
MAIN FAULT-11M 
 AREA OF SLIP EXTENDED 110 KM 
ALONG THE SLIP AND 9-45 KM 
BELOW THE SURFACE WITH RAKE 
ANGLE OF 760
PLATEAU POP-UP 
 STRESS DROP IMPLIED BY 
RUPTURE GEOMETRY AND FAULT 
SLIP OF 18+7m, EXPLAINS 
OBSERVED EPICENTRAL 
ACCELERATIONS EXCEEDING 1 g 
VERTICALLY, AND SURFACE 
VELOCITIES EXCEEDING 3 m/s
DAMAGES 
 LOSS OF LIFE- 1542 KILLED AND HUNDRED’S 
MORE HURT 
 LOSS OF PROPERTY:- 150000 SQ.MILES OF 
MASONARY BUILDINGS WERE RUINED 
 DAMAGE EXTENDED TO 250000 SQ.MILES 
FROM BURMA TO NEW DELHI 
 IN NORTH GUWAHATI, 561 AFTERSHOCKS 
WERE FELT TILL THE END OF 15TH JUNE
 IN SHILLONG 
(1) ALL THE STONE BUILDINGS WERE COLLAPSED AND ABOUT 
HALF THE EKRABUILT HOUSES WERE RUINED 
(2) PLANK HOUSES WERE UNTOUCHED 
(3) WATER BRUST THE BOUNDS OF THE LAKE MAKING THEM 
ABSOLUTELY DRY 
(4) SULPHURY SMELL IN THE AIR COMING OUT OF THE 
FISSURES WAS FELT 
FIG.EKRABUILT HOUSES 
COLLAPSED
FIG.SHILLONG CHRUCH AFTER EARTHQUAKE
 IN GOALPARA 
(1) THE EARTHQUAKE WAS ACCOMPANIED BY A TIDAL WAVE 10 
FEET HIGH WHICH DESTROYED THE BAZAAR AND ALL THE 
PAKKA BUILDINGS. 
(2) INNUMERABLE JETS OF WATER LIKE FOUNTAINS SPOUTED 
UPTO HEIGHTS VARYING 18 INCHES TO 4 FEET WERE 
INSTANTLY CREATED ON THE GROUND 
(3) IRON BRIDGES OF JOLDOBAAND KRISHNAI WERE BROKEN. 
(4) FISSURES AND SANDVENTS OCCURRED UNIVERSALLY 
THROUGHOUT GOALPARA . A FEW WERE SEEN IN LAKHIMPUR 
AND IN SIBSAGAR. 
FIG.ROWARI SANDVENT
FIG.BROKEN BRIDGE
 IN GUWAHATI 
(1) IN GUWAHATI RIVER BRAHMAPUTRA ROSE 7.6 FEET AND 
NEAR THE BANKS FLOWED UPSTREAM. IT ALSO REVERSED 
ITS DIRECTION DURING THE SHOCK. 
(2) SPRINGS OF WATER WITH VERY FINE SAND WERE 
OBSERVED. 
(3) THE RAILWAY LINES WERE DISAPPEARED. RAILS WERE 
BENT TERRIBLY AT THE RANGAPARA OF TEZPUR-BALIPARA 
TRAMWAY
FIG.UNDULATIONS FORMED 
ON GROUND SURFACE
CONSTRUCTION 
PRACTICES IN 
NORTH-EAST 
ASSAM TYPE 
HOUSES (IKRA 
HOUSES) 
THATCH 
HOUSES
IKRA HOUSES 
 IKRA HOUSES ARE SINGLE STOREY STRUCTURES 
CONSISTING OF BRICK OR STONE WALLS UPTO 
ABOUT 1M ABOVE THE PLINTH 
 THIS MASONARY SUPPORT THE WALLS 
CONSISTING OF BAMBOO WOVEN TOGETHER 
WITH A WOODEN FRAME AND PLASTERED WITH 
CEMENT OR MUD PLASTER 
 THE ROOF GENERALLY CONSISTS OF GI SHEETS 
SUPPORTED ON WOOD/BAMBOO TRUSSES 
 BAMBOO SUPERSTRUCTURE IS CONNECTED TO 
THE MASONARY FOUNDATION WALLS USING 
STEEL ANGLES AND FLATS WITH BOLTS AND 
NAILS.
Major earthquakes around the world
 AS BAMBOO IS VERY FLEXIBLE MATERIAL AND 
ALSO LIGHT WEIGHT MATERIAL, THE SEISMIC 
FORCE IS VERY LESS COMPARED TO MODERN 
HOUSING SYSTEM. SEISMIC FORCE ON BAMBOO 
HOUSING SYSTEM IS 12.97% AND 11.72% OF 
REINFORCED BRICK MASONARY AND CONFINED 
BRICK MASONARY SYSTEM RESPECTIVELY. 
140 
120 
100 
80 
60 
40 
20 
0 
Ikra housing systemReinforced masonary Confined masonary 
FIG. SEISMIC FORCES ON DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS
CONCLUSION 
BAMBOO IS USED AS MAIN 
STRUCTURAL COMPONENT IN 
ASSAM BECAUSE BAMBOO IS 
DUCTILE MATERIAL AND ITS 
PERFORMANCE IS IMPROVED 
UNDER EARTHQUAKE EVENT
THANK YOU

More Related Content

PPTX
Presentation on Earthquake in Japan & Nepal
DOCX
Japan Earthquake Case Study
PPT
Natsci2 Project. Erlinda Salas2
PPT
IRIS Presentation on March 11 Earthquake
PPT
Giant Earthquake in Japan (Mw=9.0), March 11, 2011
PPTX
Japan Earthquake
DOCX
Devastation in japan (pankit)
PPTX
Teachable moment the japan earthquake and tsunami
Presentation on Earthquake in Japan & Nepal
Japan Earthquake Case Study
Natsci2 Project. Erlinda Salas2
IRIS Presentation on March 11 Earthquake
Giant Earthquake in Japan (Mw=9.0), March 11, 2011
Japan Earthquake
Devastation in japan (pankit)
Teachable moment the japan earthquake and tsunami

What's hot (20)

PDF
2005 Kashmir Earthquake
PPTX
Earthquake horrible
PPTX
EARTH QUACK AND ITS TYPES BRIEFLY EXPLAIN
PPTX
earthquake-Agk Presentation
PDF
Earth 2011-lec-02
PPTX
Eartrhquake & tzunami
PPT
05 Chapter1
 
PPT
Presentation
DOCX
What is seismology
PPTX
5.earthquake xi
PDF
2.1 2.2 epicenter and focus and magnitude and intensity.pptx
PPTX
Basic Introduction to Earthquake engineering and seismology
PPTX
Basic of seismic engineering
PDF
Engineering Seismology
DOCX
Earthquake
PPT
Disaster Management
PPTX
Japan Earthquake, Tsunami and Radiation Event 2011
PPTX
SEISMIC ZONES OF INDIA
DOC
Volcanic earthquakes.
PDF
The tsunami warning system (week 12 cwhw)
2005 Kashmir Earthquake
Earthquake horrible
EARTH QUACK AND ITS TYPES BRIEFLY EXPLAIN
earthquake-Agk Presentation
Earth 2011-lec-02
Eartrhquake & tzunami
05 Chapter1
 
Presentation
What is seismology
5.earthquake xi
2.1 2.2 epicenter and focus and magnitude and intensity.pptx
Basic Introduction to Earthquake engineering and seismology
Basic of seismic engineering
Engineering Seismology
Earthquake
Disaster Management
Japan Earthquake, Tsunami and Radiation Event 2011
SEISMIC ZONES OF INDIA
Volcanic earthquakes.
The tsunami warning system (week 12 cwhw)
Ad

Viewers also liked (11)

PPTX
study on sikkim earthquake
PDF
Japan Earthquake Overview and Future Possibilities
PPT
Japan Earthquake and Tsunami by Justin Formosa, 3.04
PPTX
Tohoku earthquake 2011
PPT
2011 Tōhoku Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan
PPTX
2011 sendai earthquake and tsunami
PDF
Fukushima daichi disaster
PPT
Kobe Earthquake
PPSX
Japan earthquake
PPT
Japan eq and tsunami
PPTX
Earthquake resistant buildings in india
study on sikkim earthquake
Japan Earthquake Overview and Future Possibilities
Japan Earthquake and Tsunami by Justin Formosa, 3.04
Tohoku earthquake 2011
2011 Tōhoku Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan
2011 sendai earthquake and tsunami
Fukushima daichi disaster
Kobe Earthquake
Japan earthquake
Japan eq and tsunami
Earthquake resistant buildings in india
Ad

Similar to Major earthquakes around the world (20)

DOCX
The 2011 tohoku earthquake
PPTX
Bailas, leah tohoku earthquake power point
PPTX
Report by stunami azizah fitriani
PPTX
Earthquakes presentation fully detailed presentation
PPTX
The great east japan earthquake
PPTX
Multiple hazardse feb 20 13
PDF
110311japan
PPT
Geography key assesment earthquakes
PPT
THE BEST TSUNAMI PRESENTATION
PPTX
EQECAT Briefing: Understanding the M9 Tohoku Pacific Offshore Earthquake
PPT
Kobe Earthquake Case Study V2 0910
PPT
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: SAHA SİSMOLOJİSİ
PPTX
20th Anniversary of the Great Kobe Japan Earthquake
PDF
Great hanshin earthquake, kobe 1995
PPTX
History ppt on tsunami
PPT
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: MÜHENDİSLİK BİLİMLERİ
PPT
Kobe Eq
PPT
Emily
PDF
Satoru Nishikawa - Evidence informed policy making - 26 June 2017
PDF
Towards Implementation of Disaster Reduction Measures to Build Disaster Resi...
The 2011 tohoku earthquake
Bailas, leah tohoku earthquake power point
Report by stunami azizah fitriani
Earthquakes presentation fully detailed presentation
The great east japan earthquake
Multiple hazardse feb 20 13
110311japan
Geography key assesment earthquakes
THE BEST TSUNAMI PRESENTATION
EQECAT Briefing: Understanding the M9 Tohoku Pacific Offshore Earthquake
Kobe Earthquake Case Study V2 0910
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: SAHA SİSMOLOJİSİ
20th Anniversary of the Great Kobe Japan Earthquake
Great hanshin earthquake, kobe 1995
History ppt on tsunami
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: MÜHENDİSLİK BİLİMLERİ
Kobe Eq
Emily
Satoru Nishikawa - Evidence informed policy making - 26 June 2017
Towards Implementation of Disaster Reduction Measures to Build Disaster Resi...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Chemical Technological Processes, Feasibility Study and Chemical Process Indu...
PPTX
Software Engineering and software moduleing
PDF
August 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in Network Security & Its Applications
PDF
Exploratory_Data_Analysis_Fundamentals.pdf
PPT
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
PDF
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
PDF
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
PDF
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
PDF
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
PPTX
Graph Data Structures with Types, Traversals, Connectivity, and Real-Life App...
PPTX
Information Storage and Retrieval Techniques Unit III
PDF
ChapteR012372321DFGDSFGDFGDFSGDFGDFGDFGSDFGDFGFD
PPTX
AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE MANAGEMENT (MECHATRONICS).pptx
PPTX
introduction to high performance computing
PPTX
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
PDF
PREDICTION OF DIABETES FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
PDF
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
PPTX
Fundamentals of safety and accident prevention -final (1).pptx
PPTX
Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering.pptx
PPTX
Amdahl’s law is explained in the above power point presentations
Chemical Technological Processes, Feasibility Study and Chemical Process Indu...
Software Engineering and software moduleing
August 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in Network Security & Its Applications
Exploratory_Data_Analysis_Fundamentals.pdf
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
Graph Data Structures with Types, Traversals, Connectivity, and Real-Life App...
Information Storage and Retrieval Techniques Unit III
ChapteR012372321DFGDSFGDFGDFSGDFGDFGDFGSDFGDFGFD
AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE MANAGEMENT (MECHATRONICS).pptx
introduction to high performance computing
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
PREDICTION OF DIABETES FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
Fundamentals of safety and accident prevention -final (1).pptx
Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering.pptx
Amdahl’s law is explained in the above power point presentations

Major earthquakes around the world

  • 1. Tōhoku earthquake JAPAN 2011 GYANENDRA PRAKASH 13526015 (STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS)
  • 2. INTRODUCTION  Also known as the GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE and the 3.11 EARTHQUAKE.  It is the most powerful EQ ever recorded in JAPAN and fifth most powerful in the world since 1900.  Led to tsunami waves, flooding, landslides, fires, building & infrastructure damage, nuclear incidents, etc.
  • 3. EQ CHARACTERISTICS TYPE UNDERSEA MEGATHRUST MOMENT MAGNITUDE 9.0 SEISMIC MOMENT 0.332×1030 dyne-cm ENERGY RELEASED 1.9 ± 0.5×1017 joules TIME 14:46:23JST (05:46 GMT) DAY/DATE FRIDAY/11-03-2011 EPICENTER 70KM (43.5mi) east of Tōhoku 38.322°N 142.369°E HYPOCENTER 30KM (18.6 mi) underwater DURATION 6 minutes MAX. INTENSITY IX PGA 2.93g (USGS) MAX. TSUNAMI RUNUP HEIGHT 37.88 m at MIYAKO
  • 4. DAMAGE & EFFECTS ATLEAST  15,703 people killed  4,647 missing, 5,314 injured and 130,927 displaced  1,800 houses destroyed when dam failed in FUKUSHIMA  332,395 buildings, 2,126 roads, 56 bridges and 26 railways destroyed or damaged by EQ and TSUNAMI.
  • 5.  The tsunami caused nuclear accidents, primarily the level 7 meltdowns at three reactors in the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.  Matsushima Air Field of the Japan Self- Defense Force in Miyagi Prefecture was struck by the tsunami, flooding the base and resulting in damage to all 18 Mitsubishi F-2 fighter jets of the 21st Fighter Training Squadron.  US$235 billion economic losses had been experienced as per the World Bank's estimate making it the costliest natural disaster in world history.
  • 6. GEOLOGY & TECTONICS  This earthquake occurred where the Pacific Plate is subducting under the plate beneath northern Honshu.  The Pacific plate, which moves at a rate of 8 to 9 cm (3.1 to 3.5 in) per year, dips under Honshu's underlying plate building large amounts of elastic energy. This motion pushes the upper plate down until the accumulated stress causes a seismic slip-rupture event.
  • 7. FOCAL MECHANISM  STRIKE= 193°  DIP= 14°  RAKE= 81° (JMA epicenter considered)
  • 8. SLIP DISTRIBUTION  The largest asperity developed near the epicenter at 5-25 km in depth (Asperity I), one asperity located in the deep subduction zone beneath the hypocenter at about 45 km in depth (Asperity II).
  • 9.  The other two secondary asperities occurred in the north and south from the hypocenter and both were centered at about 10 km in depth (Asperity III and Asperity IV).  The slip of the largest asperity is over 30 m with a predominantely reverse motion and covers a very large area of about 160x120 km2. The slips of asperity II, III and IV are smaller and are about 20 m in average.
  • 10. RUPTURE PROCESS  At the beginning,the rupture velocity near the hypocenter was initially about 1.0 km/s.  But it increased rapidly to 5.3 km/s at shallow part (Asperity I) after about 45 second.
  • 11.  During 45 to 60 second, the rupture looked like over the velocity of shear wave that became a supershear rupture. Almost at the same period, the rupture propagated to the north also found a supershear rupture behavior between 75 and 90 second.  The rupture velocities rapidly decreased to about 0.2-0.5 km/s and didn’t indicate significant change in both the north and south.  The rupture front almost stopped until about 165 second.
  • 12.  After 160 seconds, the rupture front began to move south in the shallow subduction zone along the Japan Trench with a rupture velocity of approximately 2.0 km/s until the end of the rupture.
  • 13. MOMENT RATE FUNCTION  0-40 seconds is related to the occurrence of the rupture nucleation.  40-90 seconds includes the growth of the biggest asperity (Asperity I) at shallow part above the hypocenter.
  • 14.  the deep part of the fault began to rupture between about 100 and 160 seconds, resulting in the deep asperity (Asperity II) beneath the hypocenter.  The shallow portion of the fault began to slip toward the north (Asperity III) and south after 160 seconds.  The last release of seismic energy after about 180 to 240 seconds was caused by the slip that ruptured to the southern area along the Japan Trench (Asperity IV).  The overall duration time of the main rupture was about 240 seconds.
  • 15. FORESHOCKS & AFTERSHOCKS  7 foreshocks and 10,583 aftershocks have been experienced till now.  The first major foreshock was a 7.2 MW event on 9 March, approximately 40 km (25 mi) from the epicenter of the 11 March earthquake, with another three on the same day in excess of 6.0 MW.  Over eight hundred aftershocks of magnitude 4.5 MW or greater have occurred since the initial quake.
  • 16. INTENSITY  North-eastern part of Honshu was severely affected (based on JMA scale).
  • 17. TSUNAMI  The earthquake triggered powerful tsunami waves that reached heights of up to 37.88 metres in Miyako in Tōhoku's Iwate Prefecture, and which, in the Sendai area, travelled up to 10 km inland.
  • 18. TSUNAMI HEIGHTS OBSERVED AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS
  • 19. GEOPHYSICAL EFFECTS  The earthquake moved Honshu 2.4 m (8 ft) east.  The Earth's axis shifted by estimates of between 10 cm (4 in) and 25 cm (10 in).  The speed of the Earth's rotation increased, shortening the day by 1.8 microseconds due to the redistribution of Earth's mass.
  • 30.  Over 18,600 persons are reported to be dead and over 167,000 injured.  The estimated economic loss due to this quake is placed at around Rs.22,000 Crores.
  • 36. Kobe Earthquake1995 JAPAN Presented by Vijay kumar & Ahmed Bilal M.Tech. Str Dyn E No-135260 - 31 & 04
  • 37. At 05:46 a.m JST,On Tuesday 17 Jan 1995, A magnitude-7.2(JMA) Earthquake Struck Kobe region of South-Central Japan. Kobe is 20 km from quake center
  • 38. Where did it happen? Epicenter was located in the Akashi strait north of Awaji Island in Osaka Bay some 20km from Kobe city. The Focus was 22km beneath the Nojima Fault. Akashi Strait Osaka Bay
  • 39. Why did it happen? Kobe lies on the Nojima Fault, above a destructive plate margin. Here the heavier, oceanic philipine plate is forced under the lighter continental eurasian plate. Sudden movement of the fault caused this major earthquake. Nojima Fault Philipine plate subducted beneath the Eurasian plate
  • 40. How it happened? The earthquake generated along the intersection of the Nojima fault with the Suma fault, 16 kilometres below the Akashi strait, 20 kilometres to the west of the city. The main shake was preceded by a series of weak trembles, registered only by the seismometer in Osaka, then for 14 to 20 seconds earth trembled reaching a magnitude of 7.2 after Richter (6.9 according to the Japanese intensity scale - shindo,
  • 41. Fault Plane/Fault Model Focal Mechanism Solution Epicenter Fig.1. Fault model of Yoshida et al. (1996) for the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Two rectangles represent the surface projections of the fault segments and thick lines indicate their shallower sides. The solid star with a focal mechanism solution is the epicenter of the main shock determined by Katao et al. (1997), and gray lines are active fault traces, after KOKETSU et al. 1998.
  • 42. Why Japan has large potential for Earthquakes ?? 1500 EQs/Year 1. Tokyo is situated on Japan’s main Honshu island which in turn sits at the intersection of three continental plates, the Eurasian, Pacific and Philippine Sea plates, which are slowly grinding against each other, building up enormous seismic pressure. Most of the largest and strongest earthquakes in Japan are caused by subduction of the Philippine Sea Plate or Pacific Plate, with mechanisms that involve either energy released within the subducting plate or the accumulation and sudden release of stress in the overlying plate. 2. Japan lies along the Pacific Ring of Fire, a narrow zone around the Pacific Ocean where a large chunk of Earth's earthquakes and volcanic eruptions occur. Roughly 90 percent of all the world's earthquakes and 80 percent of the largest ones strike along the Ring of Fire. 3. Japan accounts for about 20 per cent of the world's earthquakes of magnitude six or greater and on average, an earthquake occurs there every five minutes.
  • 43. Earthquake Details Date-Time Tuesday, January 17, 1995 at 20:46:52 GMT at epicenter. Epicenter Location 3 4 . 5 8 ° N (Latitude), 135.01°E(Longitude),Located in the Akashi strait north of Awaji Island some 20km from Kobe city. Focal depth 22 km (13.67 miles) set by location program (Depth of Focus) Fault Descriptions Nojima Fault (Length = 23 km, Width = 13km) ( right-lateral strike-slip fault with a reverse component present at destructive plate boundary) Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 3.4 km (2.1 miles); depth fixed by location program It was an Intra-plate inland shallow earthquake. Magnitude ML=6.9 (on Richter Scale) and ML=7.2 (Japan Meteorological Agency Scale) Maximum Intensity VII (Local)
  • 44. Maximum Surface Displacements 1-1.5 m right-lateral, 1.7m horizontal and 1 m vertical (observed) Seismic Rupture Length Between 30km to 50km long and 15 km wide (bilateral rupture from the hypocenter, (Pitarka et al., 1995; Kikuchi, 1999) Seismic Moment 2.5x1026 dyne-cm (Mw 6.9) with a source duration of 6 to 10 seconds (Kikuchi, 1995) Human Loss 6000 deaths, 30000 injuries, 300000 homeless Economic Loss 200 billion dollars (estimated) Infrastructure Damaged 150000 Buildings Damaged, Many roadways,Bridges destroyed. Peak Ground Acceleration 0.5g to 0.8g (10 sites estimation) Peak Ground Velocity 50-175 cm/s Duration of Rupture and Faulting 20 Seconds Foreshocks and Aftershocks Four foreshocks, beginning with the largest (Mj 3.7) at 18:28 on the previous day. Within five weeks, about 50 aftershocks at Mj 4.0 or greater were observed.
  • 45. Instrumental Intensity According to Japanese Standards, Highest level 7 on the scale constructed by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) occurred in Kobe.
  • 46. Isoseismal map depicting regions of strong shaking
  • 47. Peak Ground Acceleration Max Recorded = 0.8g
  • 49. Peak Ground Velocity Max Reached= 175cm/s
  • 50. Uncertainty Decorated Bare Other Shake Maps Provided by US Geological Survey
  • 51. Earthquake Effects The aftermath of the Great Hanshin earthquake can be divided into primary and secondary effects. The primary effects included the destruction of 150,000 buildings, the collapse of 1 km of the Hanshin Expressway, the destruction of 120 of the 150 quays in the port of Kobe, and fires which took over large portions of the city. Secondary effects included some disruption of the electricity supply. Residents of Kobe were also afraid to return home because of the aftershocks that lasted several days (74 of which were strong enough to be felt).
  • 52. Economic Impact • The Great Hanshin earthquake caused over ten trillion yen ($102.5 billion) in damage, or 2.5% of Japan’s GDP at the time. • Most of the losses were completely uninsured, as only 3% of property in the Kobe area was covered by earthquake insurance, as compared to 16% in Tokyo. • The earthquake destroyed most of the facilities of what were then the world’s 6th largest container port and the source of nearly 40% of Kobe’s industrial output. • The magnitude of the earthquake alone caused a major decline in Japanese stock markets, with the Nikkei 225 index plunging by 1,025 points on the day following the earthquake.
  • 53. Failure of the first (soft)storey caused partial collapse of upper stories
  • 54. Hanshin(Kobe) Expressway suffered severe damage Ten spans of the Hanshin Expressway Route 43 in three distinct locations in Kobe and Nishinomiya were completely toppled over, blocking a key link that carried 40% of Osaka-Kobe road traffic. About half of the elevated expressway’s piers were damaged in some way. Cause: Severe Liquefaction due to Strong Ground Motion
  • 55. Damage to highways and subways : Kobe Expressway
  • 58. Ports in Kobe Damaged quay walls and port facilities on Rokko Island. Quay walls have been pushed outward by 2 to 3 meters with 3 to 4 meters deep depressed areas called grabens forming behind the walls, Kobe 1995
  • 59. Lateral displacement of a quay wall on Port Island, Kobe 1995
  • 61. Fractured Road, Japan  A crane and several construction vehicles lay toppled on a fractured road in Kobe, Japan, after a 7.2- magnitude temblor shook the quake-prone country. The Great Hanshin Earthquake Disaster of 1995 was one of the worst in Japan’s history, killing 6,433 people and causing more than $100 billion in damages.
  • 62. Twisted Railroad, Japan A steel-fortified railroad lies twisted like a toy after a 7.2- magnitude earthquake rocked Kobe, Japan, in 1995. The earthquake was the biggest to hit Japan in 47 years and shook the city for 20 seconds.
  • 63. Lateral spreading caused 1.2-2 meter drop of paved surface and local flooding, Kobe 1995.
  • 64. Retaining wall damage and lateral spreading, Kobe 1995
  • 65. Damages to bridges that cross rivers and other bodies of water due to liquefaction during Kobe Earthquake. Note: Liquefaction only occurs in saturated soil, its effects are most commonly observed in low-lying areas near bodies of water such as rivers, lakes, bays, and oceans.
  • 66. Liquefaction induced soil movements pushed the foundations out of place to the point where bridge spans loose support (above) or are compressed to the point of buckling during Kobe Earthquake.
  • 67. For Further Detailed Information • http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/events/1995_01_16.php [USGS Link] • www.terrapub.co.jp/journals/EPS/pdf/5010/50100803.pdf • http://historyofgeology.fieldofscience.com/2011/01/17-january-1995-great-kobe-earthquake.html • http://www.ce.washington.edu/~liquefaction/html/where/where1.html [Pictures Link] • http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8375788/Japan-earthquake-what-causes-them. html • http://www.geerassociation.org/GEER_Post%20EQ%20Reports/Kobe_1995/ch2-6.html [Strong Ground Motion Reports] Website Links Reference Books & Papers • A fault model of the 1995 Kobe earthquake derived from the GPS data on the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge and other datasets: Kazuki Koketsu, Shingo Yoshida, and Hiromichi Higashihara, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo ,Japan. • National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 901. The January 17,1995 Kobe Earthquake ,Performance of Structures. • Geotechnical Reconnaissance of the Effects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake, Japan, Report No. UCB/EERC-95/01 Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, United States of America.
  • 69. 1897 ASSAM EARTHQUAKE Presented By: DHANASHREE BANKAR 13526009 DEPARTMENT OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING INDIAN INSTITTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE ROORKEE Submitted to : Dr. M. L. Sharma
  • 70. INTRODUCTION  NORTH-EASTERN REGION- EARTHQUAKE PRONE REGION  ZONE V  INDIAN PLATE DIVING IN EURASIAN PLATE  STATE IS UNDERLAIN BY SEVERAL THRUST (MBT, MCT, HFF AND NAGA THRUST)  TWO MAJOR EARTHQUAKES OF MAGNITUDE 8.7 AND 8.6 OCCURRED IN 1897 AND 1950 RESPECTIVELY.
  • 71. 1897 ASSAM EARTHQUAKE  DATE- JUNE 12, 1897  TIME- 5:11 PM  LOCATION- RANGJOLI, ASSAM  LATTITUDE- 25.5N LONGITUTUDE 91.00E  MAGNITUDE- 8.7(RICHTER SCALE)  MOMENT MAGNITUDE- 8  EPICENTRE- 14 KM ESE OF SANGSIT (MEGHALAYA)
  • 72. TECTONICS OF EARTHQUAKE  SOUTH-SOUTH-WEST DIPPING REVERSE OF OLDHAM FAULT  CHEDRANG AND SAMIN FAULT  MINIMUM DISPLACEMENT ON THE MAIN FAULT-11M  AREA OF SLIP EXTENDED 110 KM ALONG THE SLIP AND 9-45 KM BELOW THE SURFACE WITH RAKE ANGLE OF 760
  • 73. PLATEAU POP-UP  STRESS DROP IMPLIED BY RUPTURE GEOMETRY AND FAULT SLIP OF 18+7m, EXPLAINS OBSERVED EPICENTRAL ACCELERATIONS EXCEEDING 1 g VERTICALLY, AND SURFACE VELOCITIES EXCEEDING 3 m/s
  • 74. DAMAGES  LOSS OF LIFE- 1542 KILLED AND HUNDRED’S MORE HURT  LOSS OF PROPERTY:- 150000 SQ.MILES OF MASONARY BUILDINGS WERE RUINED  DAMAGE EXTENDED TO 250000 SQ.MILES FROM BURMA TO NEW DELHI  IN NORTH GUWAHATI, 561 AFTERSHOCKS WERE FELT TILL THE END OF 15TH JUNE
  • 75.  IN SHILLONG (1) ALL THE STONE BUILDINGS WERE COLLAPSED AND ABOUT HALF THE EKRABUILT HOUSES WERE RUINED (2) PLANK HOUSES WERE UNTOUCHED (3) WATER BRUST THE BOUNDS OF THE LAKE MAKING THEM ABSOLUTELY DRY (4) SULPHURY SMELL IN THE AIR COMING OUT OF THE FISSURES WAS FELT FIG.EKRABUILT HOUSES COLLAPSED
  • 77.  IN GOALPARA (1) THE EARTHQUAKE WAS ACCOMPANIED BY A TIDAL WAVE 10 FEET HIGH WHICH DESTROYED THE BAZAAR AND ALL THE PAKKA BUILDINGS. (2) INNUMERABLE JETS OF WATER LIKE FOUNTAINS SPOUTED UPTO HEIGHTS VARYING 18 INCHES TO 4 FEET WERE INSTANTLY CREATED ON THE GROUND (3) IRON BRIDGES OF JOLDOBAAND KRISHNAI WERE BROKEN. (4) FISSURES AND SANDVENTS OCCURRED UNIVERSALLY THROUGHOUT GOALPARA . A FEW WERE SEEN IN LAKHIMPUR AND IN SIBSAGAR. FIG.ROWARI SANDVENT
  • 79.  IN GUWAHATI (1) IN GUWAHATI RIVER BRAHMAPUTRA ROSE 7.6 FEET AND NEAR THE BANKS FLOWED UPSTREAM. IT ALSO REVERSED ITS DIRECTION DURING THE SHOCK. (2) SPRINGS OF WATER WITH VERY FINE SAND WERE OBSERVED. (3) THE RAILWAY LINES WERE DISAPPEARED. RAILS WERE BENT TERRIBLY AT THE RANGAPARA OF TEZPUR-BALIPARA TRAMWAY
  • 80. FIG.UNDULATIONS FORMED ON GROUND SURFACE
  • 81. CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES IN NORTH-EAST ASSAM TYPE HOUSES (IKRA HOUSES) THATCH HOUSES
  • 82. IKRA HOUSES  IKRA HOUSES ARE SINGLE STOREY STRUCTURES CONSISTING OF BRICK OR STONE WALLS UPTO ABOUT 1M ABOVE THE PLINTH  THIS MASONARY SUPPORT THE WALLS CONSISTING OF BAMBOO WOVEN TOGETHER WITH A WOODEN FRAME AND PLASTERED WITH CEMENT OR MUD PLASTER  THE ROOF GENERALLY CONSISTS OF GI SHEETS SUPPORTED ON WOOD/BAMBOO TRUSSES  BAMBOO SUPERSTRUCTURE IS CONNECTED TO THE MASONARY FOUNDATION WALLS USING STEEL ANGLES AND FLATS WITH BOLTS AND NAILS.
  • 84.  AS BAMBOO IS VERY FLEXIBLE MATERIAL AND ALSO LIGHT WEIGHT MATERIAL, THE SEISMIC FORCE IS VERY LESS COMPARED TO MODERN HOUSING SYSTEM. SEISMIC FORCE ON BAMBOO HOUSING SYSTEM IS 12.97% AND 11.72% OF REINFORCED BRICK MASONARY AND CONFINED BRICK MASONARY SYSTEM RESPECTIVELY. 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Ikra housing systemReinforced masonary Confined masonary FIG. SEISMIC FORCES ON DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS
  • 85. CONCLUSION BAMBOO IS USED AS MAIN STRUCTURAL COMPONENT IN ASSAM BECAUSE BAMBOO IS DUCTILE MATERIAL AND ITS PERFORMANCE IS IMPROVED UNDER EARTHQUAKE EVENT