Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK)Nebraska Department of EducationAugust 2008
2Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with assessmentsUsed by the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) for assessment alignment in more than ten states
3Depth of KnowledgeFocuses on content standard in order to successfully complete an assessment/standard task.
Descriptive, not a taxonomy
Not the same as difficulty4Why Depth of Knowledge?No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires assessments to “measure the depth and breadth of the state academic content standards for a given grade level” (U.S. Department of Education, 2003, p. 12)
5Why Depth of Knowledge?Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that standard matches the assessment items (required under NCLB) Provides cognitive processing ceiling (highest level students can be assessed) for item development
6Depth of KnowledgeWebb’s Depth of Knowledge levels:Recall and Reproduction:   Level 1Skills & Concepts:               Level 2Strategic Thinking:             Level 3	Extended Thinking:            Level 4
7Recall and Reproduction:  Level 1DOK 1 requires recall of information, such as a fact, definition, term, or performance of a simple process or procedure. Answering a Level 1 item can involve following a simple, well-known procedure or formula. Simple skills and abilities or recall characterize DOK 1.
8DOK Level 1 ExamplesList animals that survive by eating other animals.Locate or recall facts explicitly found in textDescribe physical features of placesDetermine the perimeter or area of rectangles given a drawing or labelsIdentify elements of music using musical terminologyIdentify basic rules for participating in simple games and activities
9Skills/Concepts:  Level 2DOK 2 includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response. Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem. These actions imply more than one mental or cognitive process/step.
10DOK Level 2 ExamplesCompare desert and tropical environmentsIdentify and summarize the major events, problem, solution, conflicts in literary textExplain the cause-effect of historical eventsPredict a logical outcome based on information in a reading selectionExplain how good work habits are important at home, school, and on the job.Classify plane and three dimensional figuresDescribe various styles of music
11Strategic Thinking:  Level 3DOK 3 requires deep understanding as exhibited through planning, using evidence, and more demanding cognitive reasoning. The cognitive demands at Level 3 are complex and abstract. An assessment item that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response they give would most likely be a Level 3.
12DOK Level 3 ExamplesCompare consumer actions and analyze how these actions impact the environmentAnalyze or evaluate the effectiveness of literary elements (e.g. characterization, setting, point of view, conflict and resolution, plot structures)Solve a multiple-step problem and provide support with a mathematical explanation that justifies the answer
13DOK Level 3 ExamplesDevelop a scientific model for a complex ideaPropose and evaluate solutions for an economic problemExplain, generalize or connect ideas, using supporting evidence from a text or sourceCreate a dance that represents the characteristics of a culture
14 Extended Thinking:  Level 4 DOK 4 requires high cognitive demand and is very complex. Students are expected to make  connections—relate ideas within the content or among content areas—and have to select or devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved. Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4  often requires an extended period of time.
15However, extended time alone is not the distinguishing factor.
16Extended Reasoning/Thinking Examples:  Level 4Gather, analyze, organize, and interpret information from multiple (print and non print sources) to draft a reasoned reportAnalyzing author’s craft (e.g., style, bias, literary techniques, point of view)Create an exercise plan applying the “FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type) Principle”
17Extended Reasoning/Thinking Examples: Level 4Analyze and explain multiple perspectives or issues within or across time periods, events, or culturesSpecify a problem, identify solution paths, solve the problem, and report the resultsWrite and produce an original play
18The Depth of Knowledge is NOT determined by the verb, but the context in which the verb is used and the depth of thinking required.
19DOK 3-Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle.(requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it)
DOK 2-Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks.(requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types)
DOK 1-Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks.(simple recall)Same verb—three DOK levels

More Related Content

PPT
Writing test
PPT
Authentic Assessment
PPTX
Negotiated curriculum
PPT
Instructional Planning
PPTX
Unpacking a unit of competency
PPTX
purposes of assessment
PPTX
Performance based assessment
PPTX
Multiple choice test items
Writing test
Authentic Assessment
Negotiated curriculum
Instructional Planning
Unpacking a unit of competency
purposes of assessment
Performance based assessment
Multiple choice test items

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Curriculum Evaluation.pptx
PPTX
Authentic Assessment Tools
PDF
Writing True/False, Binary Choice, and Interpretive Exercises Test Items
PPTX
Function of Grading and Reporting System
PPTX
Type of Test
PPTX
Time - TESTED METHOD ( MODULE 7 )
PPTX
Identifying performance tasks
PPTX
ASSESSMENT ON AFFECTIVE LEARNING
DOCX
Final demo teaching english 7 figures of speech(october 02, 2017)
PPTX
Designing a-syllabus-group-7 (for memory)
PPTX
Validity Evidence
PPTX
Ed8 Assessment of Learning 2
PPTX
PDF
English gr.-7-teacher-s-guide--q1-2-
PPT
Brief History of the Interior Monologue
PPTX
Chapter 2- Authentic assessment
PDF
PERSONAL FACTORS INFLUENCING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ STUDIES
PPT
Folk narratives
PPTX
Group-15-Curriculum-Evaluation-Through-Learning-Assessment.pptx
PPT
Testing four skills
Curriculum Evaluation.pptx
Authentic Assessment Tools
Writing True/False, Binary Choice, and Interpretive Exercises Test Items
Function of Grading and Reporting System
Type of Test
Time - TESTED METHOD ( MODULE 7 )
Identifying performance tasks
ASSESSMENT ON AFFECTIVE LEARNING
Final demo teaching english 7 figures of speech(october 02, 2017)
Designing a-syllabus-group-7 (for memory)
Validity Evidence
Ed8 Assessment of Learning 2
English gr.-7-teacher-s-guide--q1-2-
Brief History of the Interior Monologue
Chapter 2- Authentic assessment
PERSONAL FACTORS INFLUENCING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ STUDIES
Folk narratives
Group-15-Curriculum-Evaluation-Through-Learning-Assessment.pptx
Testing four skills
Ad

Similar to Webbs depth of_knowledge (20)

PPT
Webb’S Depth Of Knowledge
PDF
Dok all levels_presentation
PPTX
Depth of Knowledge in Math
PPT
Webb keynote
PPT
Play Play Mode
PPTX
Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc
PPTX
Teaching with depth ccjh
PPT
Test Construction and Specifications....
PPT
Webb keynote (1)
PPTX
CCSS Bloom Icons Webb v3.pptx
PPTX
Ben porat workshop on common core
DOCX
Clinton Sutherland 1 postsReModule 5 DQ 2Psy 863 Module 5.docx
DOCX
Lesson plan water by helen keller
PPT
Academic Literacy and Instructional Rigor
PDF
Webbs-DOK-Flip-Chart obour training.pdf
PPTX
Vocabulary Instruction in Science_Burzynski.pptx
PPTX
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
PPTX
Gale, Cengage Learning Webinar, Merging High School Science with Common Core ...
PPTX
Innovation Through Inquiry Presentation
PDF
jairus
Webb’S Depth Of Knowledge
Dok all levels_presentation
Depth of Knowledge in Math
Webb keynote
Play Play Mode
Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc
Teaching with depth ccjh
Test Construction and Specifications....
Webb keynote (1)
CCSS Bloom Icons Webb v3.pptx
Ben porat workshop on common core
Clinton Sutherland 1 postsReModule 5 DQ 2Psy 863 Module 5.docx
Lesson plan water by helen keller
Academic Literacy and Instructional Rigor
Webbs-DOK-Flip-Chart obour training.pdf
Vocabulary Instruction in Science_Burzynski.pptx
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
Gale, Cengage Learning Webinar, Merging High School Science with Common Core ...
Innovation Through Inquiry Presentation
jairus
Ad

More from Denise DiGiovanni (20)

PPTX
Top 10 reasons to try instructional coaching
PPTX
Reading strategy songs 2
PPTX
Mythbusters 110228063453-phpapp02
PPTX
Awards luncheon 2011
PPTX
Mythbusters
PPT
Flag etiquette 2
PPT
Nuns circle drescher
PPT
Ad Co Slides Oct 2010
PPT
Step back protocol
PPTX
Building communities of learners 8 13-10
PPTX
Architechs of change
PPT
PPTX
PPT
PPTX
Mental images power point
PPTX
PD August 25
PPT
Easy Scab Of Spanish
PPT
King Tiger Tank
PPTX
Frilled Lizards
PPTX
Top 10 reasons to try instructional coaching
Reading strategy songs 2
Mythbusters 110228063453-phpapp02
Awards luncheon 2011
Mythbusters
Flag etiquette 2
Nuns circle drescher
Ad Co Slides Oct 2010
Step back protocol
Building communities of learners 8 13-10
Architechs of change
Mental images power point
PD August 25
Easy Scab Of Spanish
King Tiger Tank
Frilled Lizards

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
DOCX
search engine optimization ppt fir known well about this
PPTX
2018-HIPAA-Renewal-Training for executives
PDF
Flame analysis and combustion estimation using large language and vision assi...
PPTX
The various Industrial Revolutions .pptx
PDF
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
PDF
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
PDF
Consumable AI The What, Why & How for Small Teams.pdf
PPT
Galois Field Theory of Risk: A Perspective, Protocol, and Mathematical Backgr...
PDF
A proposed approach for plagiarism detection in Myanmar Unicode text
PDF
STKI Israel Market Study 2025 version august
PDF
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
PDF
Abstractive summarization using multilingual text-to-text transfer transforme...
PDF
Five Habits of High-Impact Board Members
PDF
Architecture types and enterprise applications.pdf
PPTX
Microsoft Excel 365/2024 Beginner's training
PDF
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
PPTX
AI IN MARKETING- PRESENTED BY ANWAR KABIR 1st June 2025.pptx
PDF
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
PPTX
Configure Apache Mutual Authentication
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
search engine optimization ppt fir known well about this
2018-HIPAA-Renewal-Training for executives
Flame analysis and combustion estimation using large language and vision assi...
The various Industrial Revolutions .pptx
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Consumable AI The What, Why & How for Small Teams.pdf
Galois Field Theory of Risk: A Perspective, Protocol, and Mathematical Backgr...
A proposed approach for plagiarism detection in Myanmar Unicode text
STKI Israel Market Study 2025 version august
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
Abstractive summarization using multilingual text-to-text transfer transforme...
Five Habits of High-Impact Board Members
Architecture types and enterprise applications.pdf
Microsoft Excel 365/2024 Beginner's training
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
AI IN MARKETING- PRESENTED BY ANWAR KABIR 1st June 2025.pptx
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
Configure Apache Mutual Authentication

Webbs depth of_knowledge

  • 1. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK)Nebraska Department of EducationAugust 2008
  • 2. 2Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with assessmentsUsed by the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) for assessment alignment in more than ten states
  • 3. 3Depth of KnowledgeFocuses on content standard in order to successfully complete an assessment/standard task.
  • 5. Not the same as difficulty4Why Depth of Knowledge?No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires assessments to “measure the depth and breadth of the state academic content standards for a given grade level” (U.S. Department of Education, 2003, p. 12)
  • 6. 5Why Depth of Knowledge?Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that standard matches the assessment items (required under NCLB) Provides cognitive processing ceiling (highest level students can be assessed) for item development
  • 7. 6Depth of KnowledgeWebb’s Depth of Knowledge levels:Recall and Reproduction: Level 1Skills & Concepts: Level 2Strategic Thinking: Level 3 Extended Thinking: Level 4
  • 8. 7Recall and Reproduction: Level 1DOK 1 requires recall of information, such as a fact, definition, term, or performance of a simple process or procedure. Answering a Level 1 item can involve following a simple, well-known procedure or formula. Simple skills and abilities or recall characterize DOK 1.
  • 9. 8DOK Level 1 ExamplesList animals that survive by eating other animals.Locate or recall facts explicitly found in textDescribe physical features of placesDetermine the perimeter or area of rectangles given a drawing or labelsIdentify elements of music using musical terminologyIdentify basic rules for participating in simple games and activities
  • 10. 9Skills/Concepts: Level 2DOK 2 includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response. Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem. These actions imply more than one mental or cognitive process/step.
  • 11. 10DOK Level 2 ExamplesCompare desert and tropical environmentsIdentify and summarize the major events, problem, solution, conflicts in literary textExplain the cause-effect of historical eventsPredict a logical outcome based on information in a reading selectionExplain how good work habits are important at home, school, and on the job.Classify plane and three dimensional figuresDescribe various styles of music
  • 12. 11Strategic Thinking: Level 3DOK 3 requires deep understanding as exhibited through planning, using evidence, and more demanding cognitive reasoning. The cognitive demands at Level 3 are complex and abstract. An assessment item that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response they give would most likely be a Level 3.
  • 13. 12DOK Level 3 ExamplesCompare consumer actions and analyze how these actions impact the environmentAnalyze or evaluate the effectiveness of literary elements (e.g. characterization, setting, point of view, conflict and resolution, plot structures)Solve a multiple-step problem and provide support with a mathematical explanation that justifies the answer
  • 14. 13DOK Level 3 ExamplesDevelop a scientific model for a complex ideaPropose and evaluate solutions for an economic problemExplain, generalize or connect ideas, using supporting evidence from a text or sourceCreate a dance that represents the characteristics of a culture
  • 15. 14 Extended Thinking: Level 4 DOK 4 requires high cognitive demand and is very complex. Students are expected to make connections—relate ideas within the content or among content areas—and have to select or devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved. Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4 often requires an extended period of time.
  • 16. 15However, extended time alone is not the distinguishing factor.
  • 17. 16Extended Reasoning/Thinking Examples: Level 4Gather, analyze, organize, and interpret information from multiple (print and non print sources) to draft a reasoned reportAnalyzing author’s craft (e.g., style, bias, literary techniques, point of view)Create an exercise plan applying the “FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type) Principle”
  • 18. 17Extended Reasoning/Thinking Examples: Level 4Analyze and explain multiple perspectives or issues within or across time periods, events, or culturesSpecify a problem, identify solution paths, solve the problem, and report the resultsWrite and produce an original play
  • 19. 18The Depth of Knowledge is NOT determined by the verb, but the context in which the verb is used and the depth of thinking required.
  • 20. 19DOK 3-Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle.(requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it)
  • 21. DOK 2-Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks.(requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types)
  • 22. DOK 1-Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks.(simple recall)Same verb—three DOK levels
  • 23. DOK levels can be cumulativeAn item/standard written to DOK 3 often contains DOK 1 and DOK 2 level demands
  • 24. 21Sample Science Assessment Limit(based on Webb)DOK CeilingLevelPotential DOK Levelsfor AssessmentExample A: Perform a simple science process or a set procedure to gather data 11 (Measure temperature of water)Example B: Represent data collected over a period time, making comparisons and interpretations 2Example C: Interpret data collected for a research question for a scientific problem related to your environment  3Determining DOK: Science Example1(Measure temperature of water at different times/places)2(Construct a graph to organize, display, and compare data)1(Measure temperature of water at different times/places)2(Construct a graph to organize, display, and compare data)3(Design an investigation to explain the affect of varying temperatures of the river in different locations)
  • 25. 22Remember…• Depth of Knowledge (DOK) is a scale of cognitive demand.• DOK requires looking at the assessment item/standard-not student work-in order to determine the level. DOK is about the item/standard-not the student.• The context of the assessment item/standard must be considered to determine the DOK-not just a look at what verb was chosen.