04 Formative and Summative Assessment Practices for the Co-Taught Classroom.ppt

ASSESSMENT:
FORMATIVE &
SUMMATIVE
Practices for the Co-Taught Classroom

Essential Question
 How do we think differently about
assessment and grading in the co-taught
classroom?

The word ‘assess’ comes from the Latin verb
‘assidere’ meaning ‘to sit with’.
In assessment one is supposed to sit with the
learner. This implies it is something we do ‘with’
and ‘for’ students and not ‘to’ students (Green,
1999).
What is Assessment?

Assessment in education is the process of
gathering, interpreting, recording, and
using information about pupils’ responses
to an educational task. (Harlen, Gipps,
Broadfoot, Nuttal,1992)

1. Teachers value and believe in students.
2. Sharing learning goals with the students.
3. Involving students in self-assessment.
4. Providing feedback that helps students recognize
their next steps and how to take them.
5. Being confident that every student can improve.
6. Providing students with examples of what we
expect from them.
Values and Attitudes about
Assessment

Guiding questions for determining
appropriate assessments:
1. What are your essential and enduring skills and
content you are trying to assess?
2. How does the assessment allow students to
demonstrate mastery?
3. Is every component of that objective accounted for
in the assessment?
4. Can students respond another way and still satisfy
the requirements of the assessment task?
5. Is this assessment more a test of process or
content? Is that what you’re after?

So, what is effective assessment?
1. Clearly identify learning goals.
2. Identify prerequisite skills.
3. Pre-assess students’ existing knowledge
base, understanding, and skills.
4. Identify students’ interests.
5. Identify students’ preferred ways of learning.
6. Use ongoing/formative assessment.
Handout

Examples of Pre-Assessments
 Anticipation/Reaction Guide
 Purpose: To access prior knowledge
 Three Column Chart
 Purpose: To access prior knowledge, identify areas
needing clarification, and check for understanding
 Squaring Off
 Purpose: To identify where individual students are in
relation to a specific topic in order to help group
students for a future task
 Yes/No Cards
Handout

Examples of Pre-Assessments
 Thumbs Up
 Pinch Cards
 Fist of Five
 5 – I know it so well I could explain it to anyone
 4 – I can do it alone
 3 – I need some help
 2 – I could use more practice
 1 – I am only beginning
Handout

Victoria Bernhardt, 1998
“Data help us to understand where we are
right now, where we want to go in the
future, and what it is going to take to get
there.”

Learning by Doing
DuFour, DuFour, and Eaker, 2006
“Frequent monitoring of each student’s
learning is an essential element of
effective teaching; no teacher should be
absolved from that task or allowed to
assign responsibility for it to state test
makers, central office coordinators, or
textbook publishers.”

Formative and summative assessment are
interconnected. They seldom stand alone in
construction or effect.
The vast majority of genuine formative
assessment is informal, with interactive and
timely feedback and response.
It is widely and empirically argued that
formative assessment has the greatest
impact on learning and achievement.

What is ongoing assessment?
Summative Assessments
 Assessment to capture learning
at one point in time
 Norm-referenced standardized
tests, chapter tests, etc.
Outcome:
 Improve the instrument
 Understand the extent to which
students met the intended
targets
 Addressing curricular changes,
instructional strategies and
materials
Formative Assessments
Assessment to increase student
learning
 Clear information for students on
their progress towards the
learning target
Outcome:
 Clear feedback to offer students
about their learning
 Immediate instructional changes
based on students’ progress
towards the target
Of For

If we think of our children as plants …
Summative assessment of the plants is the process of
simply measuring them. It might be interesting to compare
and analyze measurements but, in themselves, these do not
affect the growth of the plants.
Formative assessment, on the other hand, is the equivalent
of feeding and watering the plants appropriate to their needs
- directly affecting their growth.
The Garden Analogy

1. The identification by teachers & learners of learning goals,
intentions or outcomes and criteria for achieving these.
2. Rich conversations between teachers & students that
continually build and go deeper.
3. The provision of effective, timely feedback to enable students
to advance their learning.
4. The active involvement of students in their own learning.
5. Teachers responding to identified learning needs and strengths
by modifying their teaching approach(es).
Black & Wiliam, 1998
Key Elements of Formative Assessment

Summative Assessment
 Assessment of learning
 Generally taken by students at the end of a unit or
semester to demonstrate the "sum" of what they
have or have not learned.
 Summative assessment methods are the most
traditional way of evaluating student work.
 "Good summative assessments--tests and other
graded evaluations--must be demonstrably reliable,
valid, and free of bias" (Angelo and Cross, 1993).

Factors Inhibiting Assessment
 A tendency for teachers to assess quantity and
presentation of work rather than quality of
learning.
 Greater attention given to marking and grading,
much of it tending to lower self esteem of
students, rather than providing advice for
improvement.
 A strong emphasis on comparing students with
each other, which demoralizes the less successful
learners.

Ongoing formative assessment
 Exit cards
 Journal prompts
 Homework assignments
 Questioning
 Conversations with
student
 Quizzes/pre-tests
 Weekly letters
 Frayer diagram
 Problem to solve
 Journal entry
 Self-reflection
 Checklists
 Clipboard notes

Effective formative
assessment:
 Students should be able to answer three
basic questions:
Where am I going?
Where am I now?
How can I close the gap?
 Sadler (1989)

Where am I going?
 Strategy 1: Provide a clear and
understandable vision of the learning target.
 Strategy 2: Use examples of strong and
weak work.
“Students that can identify what they are learning
significantly outscore those who cannot.” Marzano, 2005

Where am I now?
 Strategy 3: Offer regular descriptive feedback.
 Strategy 4: Teach students to self-assess and
set goals.

How do I close the gap?
 Strategy 5: Design lessons to focus on one
aspect of quality at a time.
 Strategy 6: Teach students focused revision
 Strategy 7: Engage students in self-reflection
and let them document and
share their learning.

 Assessment can only be done against commonly
accepted and clearly understood criteria.
 Grades are relative.
 Teachers have to be knowledgeable in their subject
area in order to assess students properly.
 Grades are subjective and can vary from teacher to
teacher.
 Grades are not always accurate indicators of mastery.
The fact that a range of grades
occurs among teachers who grade
the same product suggests that….

Student Essay on DNA
Read and assign a grade
Share grade and reasoning
Handout

Differentiated assessment is a concept
that makes it possible to maximize
learning for ALL
ALL students.
It is a collection of instructionally intelligent
strategies and assessments based on
student-centered best practices that
make it possible for teachers to create
different pathways that respond to the
needs of diverse learners.
 SDE Training Manual, 2005

The primary goal of both
reporting and grading is . . .
Communication! To students, parents and
teachers!

Principles of Effective Grading and
Reporting
1. Grades and Reports should be based on clearly
specified learning goals and performance standards.
2. Evidence used for grading should be valid.
3. Grading should be based on established criteria.
4. Not everything should be included in grades.
5. Avoid grading based on averages.
6. Focus on achievement and report other factors
separately.

Principle 1:
 Grades and Reports should be based on
clearly specified learning goals and
performance standards.

Ken O’Connor, (2002) points out:
“In order for grades to have any real meaning
we must have more than a simple
letter/number relationship;
meaningful performance standards require
that there be description of the qualities in
student work for each symbol in the grading
scale.”

Principle 2:
 Evidence used for grading should be
valid.

Principle 3:
 Grading should be based on established
criteria.

Principle 4:
 Not everything should be included in
grades.

Principle 5:
 Avoid grading based on (mean) averages.

Consider this scenario:
 Students were asked to keep a record of
temperatures in their town for five days and
determine the average temperature for the school
week.
Monday – 70
Tuesday – 68
Wednesday – 72
Thursday – 70
Friday – 0 (Father threw newspaper out)
Average - 56

37
93
97
90
88
82
450
450
5
90
360
5
72
93
97
88
82
90
450
00
360

38
Are we ready for
A
A B
B C
C NY ?
NY ?
Do your teachers
require students to re-
do assignments to
ensure that they learn
the standards?
If they often award
Zeros and F’s, do the
students begin to see
that Learning is
optional?

Assessment @
Our School
No
Progress
Toward
Some
Progress
Toward
Not
Quite
“There”
We
Are
“There”
Diagnostic Assessments
Performance Assessments
Common Assessments
Dynamic Assessment
Frequent Feedback
Student Self Assessment
Student Peer Assessment
Rubrics Used
Student Goal Setting
Reduction of Zeros
SB Report Card
Handout

Standards-Based Report Cards
Putting the focus on
Putting the focus on Learning
Learning rather than
rather than Earning
Earning
A Letter Grade or Percentage vs. Detailed
A Letter Grade or Percentage vs. Detailed
Feedback
Feedback

Where are you in regard to using the
following strategies within your classroom?
Greater weighting of most recent
Greater weighting of most recent
assessments?
assessments?
Reduction of Zeros?
Reduction of Zeros?
Common Assessments?
Common Assessments?
Double Dosing?
Double Dosing?
Standards-based Report Card?
Standards-based Report Card?

The Power of the “I”
INCOMPLETE
Teaching and Learning to
Standards:
Reducing Zeros and Getting More Students
to Complete Work at Higher Levels
Adapted from SREB

What is the Problem?
 Students learn in the early grades,
they have an option not to turn in
their assignments.
 More and more students choose this
option as it is one that requires little
or no work or effort.
 Suddenly, Learning has become
optional at your school

Why Is there a Problem?
 Teachers believe that they are setting high expectations by
giving zeros to students who do not complete their work on
time.
 Teachers believe that accepting late assignments is wrong
because that learning set is over.
 Teachers are concerned with “fairness.”
 Teachers want to get students ready for real life where there
are no second chances.

Awarding zeros or accepting work
below standard isn’t working.
 It fails to motivate students to make
a greater effort.
 Dropout rates are still unacceptable.
 Teachers report that students not completing
work is the number one reason for failure in the
middle and ninth grades.
 More students are entering ninth grade
unprepared for challenging high school studies.
What Are the Results of the Current Practice?

 Students have learned to “dodge” hard
or lengthy assignments. They have learned
to manipulate parents and teachers.
 Even if teachers develop engaging, real-world
activities -- if students can OPT NOT TO COMPLETE
THE ASSIGNMENT and simply take a zero -- the
students will not be ready for challenging
work.
What Are the Results of the Current
Practice?

Is Awarding Zeros Working?
What data do we have that giving zeros is positively
impacting students? Where are the data?
 On Responsibility
 On Grades and Achievement Scores
 On Work Ethic and Values
 On Learning
If data is lacking, the current policy is not working.

Is Awarding Zeros Working?
 It doesn’t work most of the time
(It works best for A and B
students.)
 If it doesn’t change behavior, why
do we continue this consequence?
 Why do we let students off the
hook for not completing work at
expected standards?

F C B A
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - 69
70 - -79 80 - - 89 90 - -
100
Accurate Assessment of Student Learning:
Mandatory in Standards-Based Classrooms
Mathematically, Zeros Radically Skew
Mathematically, Zeros Radically Skew
Results.
Results.

50
Assessment vs. Grading
Student 1 receives mostly As and Bs at the start;
but his performance drops off considerably, and
she receives an F on the final performance test.
Student 2 is erratic, receiving an equal number
of As and Fs.
Student 3 is clueless at the beginning, but by the
last few sessions, she catches on and performs
flawlessly on the final performances.
Whom do you want to pack your
parachute?
All three students received a “C” Grade (75
All three students received a “C” Grade (75
Average).
Average).

52
“Insanity is doing the same thing over
and over again and expecting different results.”
Albert
Einstein

When assignments aren’t ready, or they are incomplete or
seriously below the standard and quality of expectation,
teachers can use the “The Power of the I” :
Give a grade of INCOMPLETE.

What “The Power of the I” can do
IT CAN:
 Hold students to high expectations
 Not let students “Off the Hook”
 For learning
 For delivering “quality work”
 For completing hard work
 For understanding the importance of EFFORT
 For becoming responsible citizens
 Improve the Standards of Learning for all students

IT CAN:
 Create a Culture of High Expectations
“No excuses!”
“You don’t get to choose not to work.”
 Improve the Quality of All Student Work

IT CAN:
 Allow Teachers to Really Teach to Standards
Teachers will finally know what students
can do
Takes the guesswork out of retention

IT CAN:
 Send the Right message to students
The blame game points back to the student
When students come home with an F or a
zero, they (and their parents)
often blame the teacher.
When students come home
with an “I”, only the student
is to blame.

Principle 6:
 Focus on achievement, and report other
factors separately.

Why?
 The clarity of communication is present.
 The impact of student motivation is protected.
Success breeds
success!

Reporting Systems
 Rather than only report cards
 Include multiple methods for communication
 Report cards
 Checklists
 Developmental continua for reporting progress
 Rubrics for work habits
 Narratives
 Portfolios
 Student-led conferences
 Parent meetings

Assessment and Grading
 Can it be balanced, fair AND
differentiatied?
 Ask yourself this question??????

Self-evaluation
Where would you place your assessment practice on the
following continuum?
The main focus is on:
Quantity of work/Presentation Quality of learning
Marking/Grading
Comparing students
Advice for improvement
Identifying individual
progress

Implications for classroom practice
 Share learning goals with students.
 Involve students in self-assessment.
 Provide feedback that helps students
recognize their next steps and how to take
them.
 Be confident that every student can improve.

Resources
 Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by
Design; ISBN 1-4166-0284-4
 Handbook on Differentiated Instruction for Middle and High
Schools; ISBN 1-930556-93-4
 Assessing Student Outcomes; ISBN 0-87120-225-5
 Differentiated Assessment and Grading; www.SDE.com
 Differentiated Instruction Guide for Inclusive Teaching;
ISBN 1-8879-4364-1
 Brain Compatible Classrooms; ISBN 1-57517-044-2
 http://www.gu.edu.au/centre/gihe/aboutus/aboutus_rsadler.htm
 How to Meet Standards, Motivate Students, and Still Enjoy
Teaching! ISBN: 0-7619-4615-2
 The Mindful School: How To Assess Thoughtful Outcomes;
ISBN 0-932935-58-3
 Information from Bobby Smith DOE Assessment powerpoint

04 Formative and Summative Assessment Practices for the Co-Taught Classroom.ppt

More Related Content

Similar to 04 Formative and Summative Assessment Practices for the Co-Taught Classroom.ppt (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

04 Formative and Summative Assessment Practices for the Co-Taught Classroom.ppt

Editor's Notes