SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Trends in Information ModellingConfigurable Reference Models &ProcessBuilding Blocks
Idea: Streamlining Information ModelingCostandComplexityReductionthroughConfigurative Reference ModelingCostandComplexityReductionthroughProcessBuilding Blocks
ConfigurativeReference Modelling
Configurative Reference ModelingWarehousing & 3rd-Party-DealWarehousing & 3rd-Party-DealIdea: Generating modelvariants automaticallyStarting point:integrated totalmodelDependent onuser‘s requirementsConfigurativeReference ModelingNon-Skilled PersonNon-Skilled Person
Introduction – Reuse of Information ModelsReuse of information models implies complying with needs of different user groupscompany-specific user groupscompanies as user groups  “reference models”varying requirementsto be considered within information models
Example: Requirements of Different CompaniesBusiness characteristics (e. g. type of trade business)
Example: Requirements of Company Specific User GroupsPerspectivesDimensionsofPerspectivesModeling PurposeOrganizationalRoleFurther Influences
Resulting ProblemsProblems: RedundanciesIncreased modeling and maintenance costsDanger of Inconsistencies within the model base
Solution: Configurative Information ModelingConstructionof an integrated total modelthatcontains all perspective-specificinformationsModel elementsthatare relevant formorethanoneperspectivehavetobemodeledandmaintainedonlyonceRedundanciesandinconsistenciesareavoided.
Basic Concept: Model ProjectionSpecific models for specific perspectives are provided via model projectionModel elements that are not relevant for a specific perspective are hiddenModels for specific perspectives are reprensented by viewson the integrated total model
Configuration MechanismsModel Type SelectionSelection of different model types for different perspectives(e. g. ERM vs. Technical Term Model)Element Type SelectionVariation of model types for different perspectives(e. g. annotation of organizational units in the EPC)Element SelectionHiding of non relevant, single model elementsSynonym ManagementPerspective-specific exchange of synonymsRepresentation VariationVariation of symbolsVariation of model topologiesRepresentation variation of configuration points
Model LayersModel that-describessimilaritiesoftheusedmodelinglanguages-allowsmodificationsofthemeta model language-isusedtospecifyconfigurationmechanismsModels oftheusedmodelinglanguage(s)Models oftheregardedissue(s)Issue(s) tobemodeled
E. g. Organizational DesignConfiguration Mechanisms: Model Type SelectionModel Types: resulttypesof a modelinglanguage:EPC, ERM etc.MetaMeta Model Layer:assignmentofperspectivesto model typesMeta Model Layer: Language specificationsof non selected model typesdisappearModel Layer: Modeling with „forbidden“ languagesisnolongerpossible
Configuration Mechanisms: Element Type Selection
Configuration Mechanisms: Element Type SelectionMeta Meta Model Layer:Reduction of model types by element types
Configuration Mechanisms: Element Type SelectionMeta Model Layer:Element types disappear from the specifications of model types
ProcessBuilding Blocks
Problem of Governmental Processes
FirefightersPoliceCitizens OfficeEnvironment OfficeBuilding OfficeProcess in an inter-administrational View
Traditional Process ModellingTraditional  Modelling Approaches:Use of generally applicable modelling languagesNot domain specific (harder to understand)High/varying level of detail (not always required)High degree of freedom (difficult to analyse)Syntactically complex (requires expert knowledge)Time consuming
Process Building Blocks
09   trends in information modelling
PICTURE Language Constructs (II)
Example for PICTURE Language Constructs
Objectives and ChallengesObjectives of PICTUREGet an overview of the whole process landscape of a public bodyEfficient identification and analysis of possible reorganisation activities (organisational and technical)ChallengesMany interdependent processesHuge amount of functional process know-how of employeesLimited time of employeesHandling and presentation of a huge amount of processesMaintenance and reutilisation of existing processes
Potential of the Building Block-Based Process ModellingHigher comparability of particular types of model elements to present activitiesIncreased impact of individual elements on the meaning of the whole modelIf possible: immediate use of domain-specific terminology within the process building blocks to increase the comprehensibility (e.g. “Undertake formal check”)Highlighting function for relevant issues (e.g. “Transfer data in computer system”)Limiting function for non-relevant issues (e.g. no graphical representation of complex checks of content as it is enclosed in the building block “Check content”) Result: Better comparability between models
Trends in Information ModellingConfigurable Reference Models &ProcessBuilding Blocks

More Related Content

PPT
Module 2
PPT
Exploring product line opportunities
PPTX
Bloodlytmphatic disease
PPTX
Respimicro [recovered]
DOC
Phi 1 q5&q6
PPTX
Influenza a h1 ni latest
PPTX
Bloodlytmphatic diusease
PPTX
Operating room
Module 2
Exploring product line opportunities
Bloodlytmphatic disease
Respimicro [recovered]
Phi 1 q5&q6
Influenza a h1 ni latest
Bloodlytmphatic diusease
Operating room

Similar to 09 trends in information modelling (20)

PDF
Accelerating Machine Learning as a Service with Automated Feature Engineering
PDF
A Review of Feature Model Position in the Software Product Line and Its Extra...
PPTX
Machine Learning applied in Structure Design.pptx
PPT
PABRE: Pattern-Based Requirements Elicitation
PPT
Chapter04
PPT
Lecture 12 requirements modeling - (system analysis)
PPT
An overview of software requirements engineering
PPTX
L3 Requirements Eng Overview
PDF
Comparative Development Methodologies
PPT
User Interface Derivation from Business Processes: A Model-Driven Approach fo...
DOC
K K I S109
PDF
BoUl2000_-_Developing_Data_Warehouse_Structures_from_Business_Process_Models_...
PPT
Service Oriented & Model Driven Architectures
PPT
Model-Driven Design of Audiovisual Indexing Processes for Search Apps.
PPTX
2016-03-02 research seminar
PPTX
Capability Patterns as the Enablers for Model-based Development of Business C...
PPTX
Bussiness analyst training in india
PPTX
'Applying System Science and System Thinking Techniques to BIM Management'
PDF
Technovision
PPT
Mturi licentiate presentation
Accelerating Machine Learning as a Service with Automated Feature Engineering
A Review of Feature Model Position in the Software Product Line and Its Extra...
Machine Learning applied in Structure Design.pptx
PABRE: Pattern-Based Requirements Elicitation
Chapter04
Lecture 12 requirements modeling - (system analysis)
An overview of software requirements engineering
L3 Requirements Eng Overview
Comparative Development Methodologies
User Interface Derivation from Business Processes: A Model-Driven Approach fo...
K K I S109
BoUl2000_-_Developing_Data_Warehouse_Structures_from_Business_Process_Models_...
Service Oriented & Model Driven Architectures
Model-Driven Design of Audiovisual Indexing Processes for Search Apps.
2016-03-02 research seminar
Capability Patterns as the Enablers for Model-based Development of Business C...
Bussiness analyst training in india
'Applying System Science and System Thinking Techniques to BIM Management'
Technovision
Mturi licentiate presentation
Ad

More from Yury Kupriyanov (15)

DOC
Устав проекта
DOC
Описание содержания проекта
DOC
План управления проектом
PPTX
07 integrated process modelling
PPTX
01 information systems
PPTX
10 project management
PPTX
08 worlflow management
PPTX
Hse mda bpmn_210410
PPTX
Xx additional remarks to exercise 4
PPTX
06 Introduction To Process Modeling
PPTX
05 Transformation
PPTX
02 information models
PPTX
04 data modeling 2
PPTX
03 data modeling 1
PPTX
Information Modeling (course presentation in RUS)
Устав проекта
Описание содержания проекта
План управления проектом
07 integrated process modelling
01 information systems
10 project management
08 worlflow management
Hse mda bpmn_210410
Xx additional remarks to exercise 4
06 Introduction To Process Modeling
05 Transformation
02 information models
04 data modeling 2
03 data modeling 1
Information Modeling (course presentation in RUS)
Ad

09 trends in information modelling

  • 1. Trends in Information ModellingConfigurable Reference Models &ProcessBuilding Blocks
  • 2. Idea: Streamlining Information ModelingCostandComplexityReductionthroughConfigurative Reference ModelingCostandComplexityReductionthroughProcessBuilding Blocks
  • 4. Configurative Reference ModelingWarehousing & 3rd-Party-DealWarehousing & 3rd-Party-DealIdea: Generating modelvariants automaticallyStarting point:integrated totalmodelDependent onuser‘s requirementsConfigurativeReference ModelingNon-Skilled PersonNon-Skilled Person
  • 5. Introduction – Reuse of Information ModelsReuse of information models implies complying with needs of different user groupscompany-specific user groupscompanies as user groups  “reference models”varying requirementsto be considered within information models
  • 6. Example: Requirements of Different CompaniesBusiness characteristics (e. g. type of trade business)
  • 7. Example: Requirements of Company Specific User GroupsPerspectivesDimensionsofPerspectivesModeling PurposeOrganizationalRoleFurther Influences
  • 8. Resulting ProblemsProblems: RedundanciesIncreased modeling and maintenance costsDanger of Inconsistencies within the model base
  • 9. Solution: Configurative Information ModelingConstructionof an integrated total modelthatcontains all perspective-specificinformationsModel elementsthatare relevant formorethanoneperspectivehavetobemodeledandmaintainedonlyonceRedundanciesandinconsistenciesareavoided.
  • 10. Basic Concept: Model ProjectionSpecific models for specific perspectives are provided via model projectionModel elements that are not relevant for a specific perspective are hiddenModels for specific perspectives are reprensented by viewson the integrated total model
  • 11. Configuration MechanismsModel Type SelectionSelection of different model types for different perspectives(e. g. ERM vs. Technical Term Model)Element Type SelectionVariation of model types for different perspectives(e. g. annotation of organizational units in the EPC)Element SelectionHiding of non relevant, single model elementsSynonym ManagementPerspective-specific exchange of synonymsRepresentation VariationVariation of symbolsVariation of model topologiesRepresentation variation of configuration points
  • 12. Model LayersModel that-describessimilaritiesoftheusedmodelinglanguages-allowsmodificationsofthemeta model language-isusedtospecifyconfigurationmechanismsModels oftheusedmodelinglanguage(s)Models oftheregardedissue(s)Issue(s) tobemodeled
  • 13. E. g. Organizational DesignConfiguration Mechanisms: Model Type SelectionModel Types: resulttypesof a modelinglanguage:EPC, ERM etc.MetaMeta Model Layer:assignmentofperspectivesto model typesMeta Model Layer: Language specificationsof non selected model typesdisappearModel Layer: Modeling with „forbidden“ languagesisnolongerpossible
  • 15. Configuration Mechanisms: Element Type SelectionMeta Meta Model Layer:Reduction of model types by element types
  • 16. Configuration Mechanisms: Element Type SelectionMeta Model Layer:Element types disappear from the specifications of model types
  • 19. FirefightersPoliceCitizens OfficeEnvironment OfficeBuilding OfficeProcess in an inter-administrational View
  • 20. Traditional Process ModellingTraditional Modelling Approaches:Use of generally applicable modelling languagesNot domain specific (harder to understand)High/varying level of detail (not always required)High degree of freedom (difficult to analyse)Syntactically complex (requires expert knowledge)Time consuming
  • 24. Example for PICTURE Language Constructs
  • 25. Objectives and ChallengesObjectives of PICTUREGet an overview of the whole process landscape of a public bodyEfficient identification and analysis of possible reorganisation activities (organisational and technical)ChallengesMany interdependent processesHuge amount of functional process know-how of employeesLimited time of employeesHandling and presentation of a huge amount of processesMaintenance and reutilisation of existing processes
  • 26. Potential of the Building Block-Based Process ModellingHigher comparability of particular types of model elements to present activitiesIncreased impact of individual elements on the meaning of the whole modelIf possible: immediate use of domain-specific terminology within the process building blocks to increase the comprehensibility (e.g. “Undertake formal check”)Highlighting function for relevant issues (e.g. “Transfer data in computer system”)Limiting function for non-relevant issues (e.g. no graphical representation of complex checks of content as it is enclosed in the building block “Check content”) Result: Better comparability between models
  • 27. Trends in Information ModellingConfigurable Reference Models &ProcessBuilding Blocks