Air and Waste Management Association Professional Development Course AIR-257: Satellite Detection of Aerosols Concepts and Theory Instructor: Rudolf Husar, Ph.D. Professor of Mechanical Engineering Washington University, St. Louis, MO October 25, 2004, 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.  Asheville, NC
Syllabus 9:00-9:30  Introduction to satellite aerosol detection and monitoring 9:30-10:00  Satellite Types and their Usage 10:00-10:30  Satellite detection of aerosol events: fires, dust storms, haze 10:30-10:45 Break 10:45-11:00 Satellite data and tools for the RPO FASTNET project 11:15-11:30 Satellite Data Use in AQ Management: Issues and Opportunities 11:30-12:00 Class-defined problems, feedback, discussion, exam(?)
Radiation detected by satellites Air scattering depends on geometry and can be calculated (Rayleigh scattering)  Clouds completely obscure the surface and have to be masked out Aerosols redirect incoming radiation by scattering and also absorb a fraction Surface reflectance is a property of the surface
Just like the human eye, satellite sensors detect the total amount of solar radiation that is reflected from the earth’s surface ( R o ) and backscattered  by the atmosphere from aerosol, pure air, and clouds. A simplified expression for the relative radiatioin detected by a satellite sensor (I/I o ) is: I / I o  = R o  e -    + (1- e -  ) P Satellite Detection of Aerosols Today, geo-synchronous and polar orbiting satellites can detect different aspects of aerosols over the globe daily. where    is the aerosol optical thickness and P the angular light scattering probability.
SeaWiFS Satellite Platform and Sensors Satellite maps the world daily in 24 polar swaths The 8 sensors are in the transmission windows in the visible & near IR Designed for ocean color but also suitable for land color detection, particularly of vegetation  Chlorophyll Absorption Designed for Vegetation Detection Swath 2300 KM 24/day Polar Orbit: ~ 1000 km, 100 min. Equator Crossing: Local Noon
Key aerosol microphysical parameters Particle size and size distribution Aerosol particles > 1   m in size are produced by windblown dust and sea salt from  sea spray and bursting bubbles. Aerosols  smaller than 1   m are mostly formed by  condensation processes such as conversion of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) gas to sulfate  particles and by formation of soot and smoke during burning processes Effective radius Moment of size distribution weighted by particle area and number density distribution Complex refractive index The real part mainly affects scattering and the imaginary part mainly affects absorption Particle shape Aerosol particles can be liquid or solid, and therefore spherical or nonspherical. The most common nonspherical particles are dust and cirrus
Key aerosol optical parameters Optical depth  negative logarithm of the direct-beam transmittance  column integrated measure of the amount of extinction (absorption + scattering) Single-scattering albedo   0  given an interaction between a photon and a particle, the probability that the photon is scattered in some direction, rather than absorbed Scattering phase function  probability per unit solid angle that a photon is scattered into a particular  direction relative to the direction of the incident beam Angstrom exponent    exponent of power law representation of extinction vs. wavelength
Remote Sensing Overview What is “remote sensing”? Using artificial devices, rather than our eyes, to observe or measure things from a distance without disturbing the intervening medium It enables us to observe & measure things on spatial, spectral, & temporal scales that otherwise would not be possible It allows us to observe our environment using a consistent set of measurements throughout the globe, without prejudice associated with national boundaries and accuracy of datasets or timeliness of reporting How is remote sensing done? Electromagnetic spectrum Passive sensors from the ultraviolet to the microwave Active sensors such as radars and lidars Satellite, airborne, and surface sensors Training and validation sites
Remote Sensing Applications to be Covered in this Course History of remote sensing & global change  Remote sensing of land surface properties Spectral and angular reflectance, land cover & land cover change Fire monitoring and burn scars Leaf area index & flux of photosynthetically active radiation Temperature & emissivity separation of terrestrial surfaces Remote sensing of atmospheric properties Cloud cover, cloud optical properties, and cloud top properties Aerosol properties Water vapor Atmospheric chemistry (carbon monoxide and methane) Earth radiation budget and cloud radiative forcing Remote sensing of the oceans from space Chlorophyll concentration and biological productivity of the oceans  Sea surface temperature using thermal methods Angular directional models of the Earth-atmosphere-ocean system
Remote sensing uses the radiant energy that is reflected and emitted from Earth at various “wavelengths” of the electromagnetic spectrum Our eyes are only sensitive to the “visible light” portion of the EM spectrum Why do we use nonvisible wavelengths? The Electromagnetic Spectrum Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
Atmospheric Absorption in the Wavelength Range from 0-15 µm Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
Generalized Spectral Reflectance Envelopes for Deciduous and Coniferous Trees Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
Typical Spectral Reflectance Curves for Vegetation, Soil, and Water Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
Different Types of Reflectors Specular reflector (mirror) diffuse reflector (lambertian) nearly diffuse reflector Nearly Specular reflector (water) E. Vermote, 2002 Hot spot reflection
Sun glint as seen by MODIS Hot hot-spot over dense vegetation E. Vermote, 2002
Scattering of Sunlight by the Earth-Atmosphere-Surface System A = radiation transmitted through the atmosphere and reflected by the surface B = radiation scattered by the atmosphere and reflected by the surface C = radiation scattered by the atmosphere and into the ‘radiometer’ G = radiation transmitted through the atmosphere, reflected by background objects, and subsequently reflected by the surface towards the ‘radiometer’ I = ‘adjacency effect’ of reflectance from a surface outside the field of view of the sensor into its field of view Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
Solar Energy Paths
Aerosol and Surface Radiative Transfer   Major Assumptions Gaseous scattering and absorption is subtractable from the sensed radiation – multiple scattering is negligible. All the remaining solar radiation reaches the surface directly or diffusely –small backscattering fraction. Backscattering to space is due to incoming solar radiation – low surface reflectance.  I 0   – Intensity of   the incoming radiation.  R 0 -  surface reflectance. Depends on surface type as well as the incoming and outgoing angles  R-  surface reflectance sensed at the top of the atmosphere as perturbed by the atmosphere P  - aerosol angular reflectance function; includes absorption,  P =  ω  p
Apparent Surface Reflectance, R The surface reflectance  R 0  is obscured by aerosol scattering and absorption before it reaches the sensor Aerosol acts as a  filter  of surface reflectance and as a  reflector  solar radiation Aerosol as Reflector:  R a  = ( e -  –  1 )  P R =  ( R 0  +  ( e -  –  1 )  P )  e -  Aerosol as Filter:  T a  =  e -  Surface reflectance  R 0 The  apparent reflectance ,  R ,  detected by the sensor is:  R   =  ( R 0  +  R a )  T a Under cloud-free conditions, the sensor receives the reflected radiation from  surface  and  aerosols Both surface and aerosol signal varies independently in time and space Challenge: Separate the total received radiation into surface and aerosol components
Apparent Surface Reflectance, R   Aerosols will increase the apparent surface reflectance, R,  if  P/R 0  < 1.  For this reason, the reflectance of ocean and dark vegetation increases with τ. When  P/R 0  > 1,  aerosols will decrease the surface reflectance. Accordingly, the brightness of clouds is reduced by overlying aerosols.  At  P~ R 0  the reflectance is unchanged by haze aerosols (e.g. soil and vegetation at 0.8 um). .   At large τ (radiation equilibrium), both dark and bright surfaces asymptotically approach the ‘aerosol reflectance’, P  The critical parameter whether aerosols will increase or decrease the apparent reflectance, R,  is the ratio of aerosol angular reflectance,  P,  to bi-directional surface reflectance,  R 0 , P/ R 0
Reduced Reflectance Reflectance Reflectance Increased Reflectance
Loss of Contrast The aerosol τ can also be estimated from the loss of surface contrast.  Whether contrast decays fast or slow with increasing τ depends on the ratio of aerosol to surface reflectance,  P/ R 0 Note: For horizontal vision against the horizon sky, P/R 0  = 1,   contrast decays exponentially with τ,  C/C 0 =e -τ .
Obtaining Aerosol Optical Thickness from Excess Reflectance The perturbed surface reflectance, R, can be used to derive the the aerosol optical thickness, τ , provided that the true surface reflectance R 0  and the aerosol reflectance function, P are known. The excess reflectance due to aerosol is : R- R 0  = (P- R 0 )(1-e - τ ) and the optical depth is: For a black surface, R 0  =0 and optically thin aerosol, τ < 0.1, τ is proportional to excess radiance, τ =R/P. For τ > 0.1, the full logarithmic expression is needed. As R 0  increases, the same excess reflectance corresponds to increasing values of τ.  When R 0  ~P the aerosol τ can not be retrieved since the excess reflectance is zero. For R 0  > P, the surface reflectance actually decreases with τ, so τ could be retrieved from the loss of reflectance, e.g. over bright clouds. The value of P is derived from fitting the observed and retrieved surface reflectance spectra. For summer light haze at 0.412 μm, P=0.38. Accurate and automatic retrieval of the relevant aerosol P is the most difficult part of the co-retrieval process. Iteratively calculating P from the estimated  τ( λ) is one possibility.
Aerosol Effects on Surface Color and Surface Effects on Aerosol Color The image was synthesized from the  blue  (0.412 μm),  green  (0.555 μm), and  red  (0.67 μm) channels of the 8 channel SeaWiFS sensor. Air scattering is removed to highlight the haze and surface reflectance.
Aerosol Effect on Surface Color and Surface Effect on Aerosol Aerosols  add  to the reflectance and sometimes  reduce  the reflectance of surface objects Aerosols always  diminish  the  contrast  between dark a bright surface objects Haze  and smoke aerosols  change the color  of surface objects to bluish while  dust  adds a yellowish tint.  (Click on the Images to View) Dark  surfaces like ocean and dark vegetation makes the aerosol appear  bright . Bright  surfaces like sand and clouds makes the aerosol  invisible .
SeaWiFS Images and Spectra at Four Wavelengths  (Click on the Images to View) At  blue (0.412)  wavelength, the  haze reflectance dominates  over land surface reflectance. The surface features are obscured by haze. Air scattering (not included) would add further reflectance in the blue. The  blue  wavelength  is well suited for aerosol detection over land  but surface detection is difficult.  At  green (0.555)  over land, the  haze is reduced and the vegetation reflectance is increased . The surface features are obscured by haze but discernable. Due to the low reflectance of the sea, haze reflectance dominates. The green not well suited for haze detection over land but appropriate for haze detection over the ocean and for the detection of surface features. At  red (0.67)  wavelength over land, dark vegetation is distinctly different from brighter yellow-gray soil. The surface features, particularly water (R 0 <0.01), vegetation (R 0 <0.04), and  soil (R 0 <0.30) are are easily distinguishable. Haze reflectance dominates over the ocean. Hence, the  red is suitable for haze detection over dark vegetation and the ocean  as well as for surface detection over land. In the  near IR (0.865)  over land, the surface reflectance is uniformly high (R 0 >0.30) over both vegetation and soil and  haze is not discernable . Water is completely dark (R 0 <0.01) making land and water clearly distinguishable. The excess haze reflectance over land is barely perceptible but measurable over water. Hence, the near IR is suitable for haze detection over water and land-water differentiation.
Aerosol effects on surface color and Surface effects on aerosol color The image was synthesized from the  blue  (0.412 μm),  green  (0.555 μm), and  red  (0.67 μm) channels of the 8 channel SeaWiFS sensor.  Air scattering has been removed to highlight the haze and surface reflectance.
Preprocessing Transform raw SeaWiFS data   Georeferencing – warping data to geographic lat/lon coordinates with a pixel resolution of ~ 1.6 km Splicing – mosaic data from adjacent swaths to cover entire domain Rayleigh correction – remove scattering by atmospheric gases and convert to reflectance units Scattering angle correction – normalize all pixels to remove reflectance dependence on sun-target-sensor angles Result is daily apparent reflectance, R for all 8 channels
General Approach:  Co-Retrieval of Surface and Aerosol Reflectance Surface Reflectance Retrieval by Time Series Analysis  (Sean Raffuse, MS Thesis 2003) Aerosol Retrieval over Land  Radiative transfer model + Surface data Refined Surface Reflectance  Iteration back to 1., 2. …
Approach – Time Series Analysis For any location (pixel), the sensor detects a “clean” day periodically Aerosol scattering (haze) is near zero Pixel must also be free of other interferences Clouds Cloud shadows
Methodology – Cloud shadows Clouds are easily detected by their high reflectance values Cloud shadows are found in the vicinity of clouds We enlarge the cloud mask by a three-pixel ‘halo’ to remove cloud shadows Cloud shadows reduce the apparent surface reflectance considerably in all channels
Methodology – Preliminary anchor days Surface reflectance is retrieved for individual pixels from time series data (e.g. year)  The procedure first identifies a set of ‘preliminary clear anchor’ days in a 17-day moving window The main interferences (clouds and haze) tend to increase the apparent surface reflectance, especially in the low wavelength channels The anchor day is chosen as the day with the minimum sum of the lowest four channels
Results – Seasonal surface reflectance, Eastern US April 29, 2000, Day 120 July 18, 2000,  Day 200 October 16, 2000,  Day 290
Results – Eight month animation
Retrieval Procedures Rayleigh air scattering and gaseous absorption is removed first by the E. Vermote algorithm. Cloudy pixels are masked out since they obscure the surface and aerosol reflectance  The remaining reflectance over land and water consists of the combined effect of aerosol scattering/absorption and surface reflectance. The goal of the co-retrieval is to separate the reflectance due to aerosol from surface reflectance

More Related Content

PPT
2004-10-03 Co-retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance: Analysis of Daily...
PPT
0421026 Visib Satellite
PPT
2004-06-24 Co-retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance: Analysis of Daily...
PPT
2004-06-23 Retrieval of smoke aerosol loading from remote sensing data
PPT
Surveying ii ajith sir class5
PDF
Remote sensing principles-spectral signature-spectural range
PPT
Surveying ii ajith sir class2
PPTX
Introduction to remote sensing pt 1
2004-10-03 Co-retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance: Analysis of Daily...
0421026 Visib Satellite
2004-06-24 Co-retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance: Analysis of Daily...
2004-06-23 Retrieval of smoke aerosol loading from remote sensing data
Surveying ii ajith sir class5
Remote sensing principles-spectral signature-spectural range
Surveying ii ajith sir class2
Introduction to remote sensing pt 1

What's hot (19)

PPT
Spectral signatures
PPT
Surveying ii ajith sir class6
PPTX
Remote Sensing
PPT
Surveying ii ajith sir class3
PDF
Remote Sensing
PPTX
Introduction to Remote Sensing
PDF
Microwave remote sensing
PPTX
Microwave remote sensing
PPTX
.remote sensing.Ece 402 unit-2
PPTX
ENERGY INTERACTIONS WITH EARTH SURFACE FEATURES
PPT
Chapter 1 (Introduction to remote sensing)
PDF
INTRODUCTION TO REMOTE SENSING
PDF
Remote sensing
DOCX
Atmospheric windows
PPT
chapter2: Remote sensing
PPTX
. Atmospheric window and reflectance curve
PPT
Scattering
PDF
Remote sensing
PPT
L3 emr
Spectral signatures
Surveying ii ajith sir class6
Remote Sensing
Surveying ii ajith sir class3
Remote Sensing
Introduction to Remote Sensing
Microwave remote sensing
Microwave remote sensing
.remote sensing.Ece 402 unit-2
ENERGY INTERACTIONS WITH EARTH SURFACE FEATURES
Chapter 1 (Introduction to remote sensing)
INTRODUCTION TO REMOTE SENSING
Remote sensing
Atmospheric windows
chapter2: Remote sensing
. Atmospheric window and reflectance curve
Scattering
Remote sensing
L3 emr
Ad

Viewers also liked (14)

PPT
Energy-Environment Integration Framework
PPT
041026 Icap Transp Quant
PPT
2004-10-03 Co-retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance: Analysis of Daily...
PPT
2004-09-29 Status Report on CATT and FASTNET
PPT
2008-07-07 EPA Interoperability
PPT
2004-10-28 Intercontinental Dust and Smoke over North America:Quantitative To...
PPT
2005-01-28 Assessment of the Speciated PM Network (Initial Draft, November 2004)
PPT
Energy-Environment Intro
PPT
2004-07-28 Fast Aerosol Sensing Tools for Natural Event Tracking FASTNET
PPT
040715 Catt Report Pics
PPT
2005-04-14 The Great Midwestern PM2.5 Episode of February 2005
PPT
2004-11-13 Supersite Relational Database Project: (Data Portal?)
PPT
2008-05-05 GEOSS UIC-ADC AQ Scen W shop Toronto
PPT
4 Sat Rpo Fastnet
Energy-Environment Integration Framework
041026 Icap Transp Quant
2004-10-03 Co-retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance: Analysis of Daily...
2004-09-29 Status Report on CATT and FASTNET
2008-07-07 EPA Interoperability
2004-10-28 Intercontinental Dust and Smoke over North America:Quantitative To...
2005-01-28 Assessment of the Speciated PM Network (Initial Draft, November 2004)
Energy-Environment Intro
2004-07-28 Fast Aerosol Sensing Tools for Natural Event Tracking FASTNET
040715 Catt Report Pics
2005-04-14 The Great Midwestern PM2.5 Episode of February 2005
2004-11-13 Supersite Relational Database Project: (Data Portal?)
2008-05-05 GEOSS UIC-ADC AQ Scen W shop Toronto
4 Sat Rpo Fastnet
Ad

Similar to 1 Sat Intro (20)

PPT
Co Retriaval2
PPT
2005-02-01 Co-Retrieval of Aerosol Color and Surface Color from SeaWiFS Satel...
PPT
2005-12-05 Aerosol Characterization Using the SeaWiFS Sensor and Surface Data
PDF
1148_DAILY_ESTIMATES_OF_THE_TROPOSPHERIC_AEROSOL_OPTICAL_THICKNESS_OVER_LAND_...
PDF
1148_DAILY_ESTIMATES_OF_THE_TROPOSPHERIC_AEROSOL_OPTICAL_THICKNESS_OVER_LAND_...
PPTX
Remote Sensing of Aerosols
PPT
061018 Sea Wi Fs Work
PPTX
Atmospheric Scattering in remote Sensing
PPT
Emr intraction with atmosphere
PDF
Aerosol retrieval using modis data &amp; rt code
PPTX
Remote sensing.......................pptx
PPTX
Introduction of remote sensing
PPTX
Fundamentals of remote sensing - introduction.pptx
PDF
Unit iv remote sensing
PPTX
Fundamentals of Remote Sensing
PPTX
Remote sensing introduction 1 9-14
PPT
TU2.L10 - ACCURATE MONITORING OF TERRESTRIAL AEROSOLS AND TOTAL SOLAR IRRADIA...
PPTX
remote sensing - unit 1 - components of remote
PDF
2 Intro RS.pdf
PPTX
Remote sensing concept, history and principles
Co Retriaval2
2005-02-01 Co-Retrieval of Aerosol Color and Surface Color from SeaWiFS Satel...
2005-12-05 Aerosol Characterization Using the SeaWiFS Sensor and Surface Data
1148_DAILY_ESTIMATES_OF_THE_TROPOSPHERIC_AEROSOL_OPTICAL_THICKNESS_OVER_LAND_...
1148_DAILY_ESTIMATES_OF_THE_TROPOSPHERIC_AEROSOL_OPTICAL_THICKNESS_OVER_LAND_...
Remote Sensing of Aerosols
061018 Sea Wi Fs Work
Atmospheric Scattering in remote Sensing
Emr intraction with atmosphere
Aerosol retrieval using modis data &amp; rt code
Remote sensing.......................pptx
Introduction of remote sensing
Fundamentals of remote sensing - introduction.pptx
Unit iv remote sensing
Fundamentals of Remote Sensing
Remote sensing introduction 1 9-14
TU2.L10 - ACCURATE MONITORING OF TERRESTRIAL AEROSOLS AND TOTAL SOLAR IRRADIA...
remote sensing - unit 1 - components of remote
2 Intro RS.pdf
Remote sensing concept, history and principles

More from Rudolf Husar (20)

PPT
100528 satellite obs_china_husar
PPTX
2013-04-30 EE DSS Approach and Demo
PPTX
Exceptional Event Decision Support System Description
PPTX
130205 epa exc_event_seminar
PPTX
130205 epa ee_presentation_subm
PPT
111018 geo sif_aq_interop
PPT
110823 solta11 intro
PPTX
110823 data fed_solta11
PPT
110510 aq co_p_network
PPT
110509 aq co_p_solta
PPT
110421 exploration of_pm_networks_and_data_over_the_us-_aqs_and_views
PPT
110410 aq user_req_methodology_sydney_subm
PPT
110408 aq co_p_uic_sydney_husar
PPT
110105 htap pilot_aqco_p_esip_dc
PPT
100615 htap network_brussels
PPTX
121117 eedss briefing_nasa_epa
PPTX
120910 nasa satellite_outline
PPTX
120612 geia closure_ofeo_ms_soa_subm
PPTX
110414 extreme dustsmokesulfate
PPT
Aq Gci Infrastructure
100528 satellite obs_china_husar
2013-04-30 EE DSS Approach and Demo
Exceptional Event Decision Support System Description
130205 epa exc_event_seminar
130205 epa ee_presentation_subm
111018 geo sif_aq_interop
110823 solta11 intro
110823 data fed_solta11
110510 aq co_p_network
110509 aq co_p_solta
110421 exploration of_pm_networks_and_data_over_the_us-_aqs_and_views
110410 aq user_req_methodology_sydney_subm
110408 aq co_p_uic_sydney_husar
110105 htap pilot_aqco_p_esip_dc
100615 htap network_brussels
121117 eedss briefing_nasa_epa
120910 nasa satellite_outline
120612 geia closure_ofeo_ms_soa_subm
110414 extreme dustsmokesulfate
Aq Gci Infrastructure

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
OpenACC and Open Hackathons Monthly Highlights July 2025
PDF
A Late Bloomer's Guide to GenAI: Ethics, Bias, and Effective Prompting - Boha...
PDF
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
PDF
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
PPTX
Final SEM Unit 1 for mit wpu at pune .pptx
PDF
Enhancing emotion recognition model for a student engagement use case through...
PPTX
Custom Battery Pack Design Considerations for Performance and Safety
PDF
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
PPTX
AI IN MARKETING- PRESENTED BY ANWAR KABIR 1st June 2025.pptx
PDF
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
PPT
What is a Computer? Input Devices /output devices
PDF
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
PDF
UiPath Agentic Automation session 1: RPA to Agents
PDF
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
PDF
A proposed approach for plagiarism detection in Myanmar Unicode text
PPT
Geologic Time for studying geology for geologist
PPTX
Microsoft Excel 365/2024 Beginner's training
PDF
TrustArc Webinar - Click, Consent, Trust: Winning the Privacy Game
PPTX
Modernising the Digital Integration Hub
PDF
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
OpenACC and Open Hackathons Monthly Highlights July 2025
A Late Bloomer's Guide to GenAI: Ethics, Bias, and Effective Prompting - Boha...
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
Final SEM Unit 1 for mit wpu at pune .pptx
Enhancing emotion recognition model for a student engagement use case through...
Custom Battery Pack Design Considerations for Performance and Safety
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
AI IN MARKETING- PRESENTED BY ANWAR KABIR 1st June 2025.pptx
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
What is a Computer? Input Devices /output devices
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
UiPath Agentic Automation session 1: RPA to Agents
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
A proposed approach for plagiarism detection in Myanmar Unicode text
Geologic Time for studying geology for geologist
Microsoft Excel 365/2024 Beginner's training
TrustArc Webinar - Click, Consent, Trust: Winning the Privacy Game
Modernising the Digital Integration Hub
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...

1 Sat Intro

  • 1. Air and Waste Management Association Professional Development Course AIR-257: Satellite Detection of Aerosols Concepts and Theory Instructor: Rudolf Husar, Ph.D. Professor of Mechanical Engineering Washington University, St. Louis, MO October 25, 2004, 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Asheville, NC
  • 2. Syllabus 9:00-9:30 Introduction to satellite aerosol detection and monitoring 9:30-10:00 Satellite Types and their Usage 10:00-10:30 Satellite detection of aerosol events: fires, dust storms, haze 10:30-10:45 Break 10:45-11:00 Satellite data and tools for the RPO FASTNET project 11:15-11:30 Satellite Data Use in AQ Management: Issues and Opportunities 11:30-12:00 Class-defined problems, feedback, discussion, exam(?)
  • 3. Radiation detected by satellites Air scattering depends on geometry and can be calculated (Rayleigh scattering) Clouds completely obscure the surface and have to be masked out Aerosols redirect incoming radiation by scattering and also absorb a fraction Surface reflectance is a property of the surface
  • 4. Just like the human eye, satellite sensors detect the total amount of solar radiation that is reflected from the earth’s surface ( R o ) and backscattered by the atmosphere from aerosol, pure air, and clouds. A simplified expression for the relative radiatioin detected by a satellite sensor (I/I o ) is: I / I o = R o e -  + (1- e -  ) P Satellite Detection of Aerosols Today, geo-synchronous and polar orbiting satellites can detect different aspects of aerosols over the globe daily. where  is the aerosol optical thickness and P the angular light scattering probability.
  • 5. SeaWiFS Satellite Platform and Sensors Satellite maps the world daily in 24 polar swaths The 8 sensors are in the transmission windows in the visible & near IR Designed for ocean color but also suitable for land color detection, particularly of vegetation Chlorophyll Absorption Designed for Vegetation Detection Swath 2300 KM 24/day Polar Orbit: ~ 1000 km, 100 min. Equator Crossing: Local Noon
  • 6. Key aerosol microphysical parameters Particle size and size distribution Aerosol particles > 1  m in size are produced by windblown dust and sea salt from sea spray and bursting bubbles. Aerosols smaller than 1  m are mostly formed by condensation processes such as conversion of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) gas to sulfate particles and by formation of soot and smoke during burning processes Effective radius Moment of size distribution weighted by particle area and number density distribution Complex refractive index The real part mainly affects scattering and the imaginary part mainly affects absorption Particle shape Aerosol particles can be liquid or solid, and therefore spherical or nonspherical. The most common nonspherical particles are dust and cirrus
  • 7. Key aerosol optical parameters Optical depth  negative logarithm of the direct-beam transmittance  column integrated measure of the amount of extinction (absorption + scattering) Single-scattering albedo  0  given an interaction between a photon and a particle, the probability that the photon is scattered in some direction, rather than absorbed Scattering phase function  probability per unit solid angle that a photon is scattered into a particular direction relative to the direction of the incident beam Angstrom exponent   exponent of power law representation of extinction vs. wavelength
  • 8. Remote Sensing Overview What is “remote sensing”? Using artificial devices, rather than our eyes, to observe or measure things from a distance without disturbing the intervening medium It enables us to observe & measure things on spatial, spectral, & temporal scales that otherwise would not be possible It allows us to observe our environment using a consistent set of measurements throughout the globe, without prejudice associated with national boundaries and accuracy of datasets or timeliness of reporting How is remote sensing done? Electromagnetic spectrum Passive sensors from the ultraviolet to the microwave Active sensors such as radars and lidars Satellite, airborne, and surface sensors Training and validation sites
  • 9. Remote Sensing Applications to be Covered in this Course History of remote sensing & global change Remote sensing of land surface properties Spectral and angular reflectance, land cover & land cover change Fire monitoring and burn scars Leaf area index & flux of photosynthetically active radiation Temperature & emissivity separation of terrestrial surfaces Remote sensing of atmospheric properties Cloud cover, cloud optical properties, and cloud top properties Aerosol properties Water vapor Atmospheric chemistry (carbon monoxide and methane) Earth radiation budget and cloud radiative forcing Remote sensing of the oceans from space Chlorophyll concentration and biological productivity of the oceans Sea surface temperature using thermal methods Angular directional models of the Earth-atmosphere-ocean system
  • 10. Remote sensing uses the radiant energy that is reflected and emitted from Earth at various “wavelengths” of the electromagnetic spectrum Our eyes are only sensitive to the “visible light” portion of the EM spectrum Why do we use nonvisible wavelengths? The Electromagnetic Spectrum Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
  • 11. Atmospheric Absorption in the Wavelength Range from 0-15 µm Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
  • 12. Generalized Spectral Reflectance Envelopes for Deciduous and Coniferous Trees Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
  • 13. Typical Spectral Reflectance Curves for Vegetation, Soil, and Water Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
  • 14. Different Types of Reflectors Specular reflector (mirror) diffuse reflector (lambertian) nearly diffuse reflector Nearly Specular reflector (water) E. Vermote, 2002 Hot spot reflection
  • 15. Sun glint as seen by MODIS Hot hot-spot over dense vegetation E. Vermote, 2002
  • 16. Scattering of Sunlight by the Earth-Atmosphere-Surface System A = radiation transmitted through the atmosphere and reflected by the surface B = radiation scattered by the atmosphere and reflected by the surface C = radiation scattered by the atmosphere and into the ‘radiometer’ G = radiation transmitted through the atmosphere, reflected by background objects, and subsequently reflected by the surface towards the ‘radiometer’ I = ‘adjacency effect’ of reflectance from a surface outside the field of view of the sensor into its field of view Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project Scientist
  • 18. Aerosol and Surface Radiative Transfer Major Assumptions Gaseous scattering and absorption is subtractable from the sensed radiation – multiple scattering is negligible. All the remaining solar radiation reaches the surface directly or diffusely –small backscattering fraction. Backscattering to space is due to incoming solar radiation – low surface reflectance. I 0 – Intensity of the incoming radiation. R 0 - surface reflectance. Depends on surface type as well as the incoming and outgoing angles R- surface reflectance sensed at the top of the atmosphere as perturbed by the atmosphere P - aerosol angular reflectance function; includes absorption, P = ω p
  • 19. Apparent Surface Reflectance, R The surface reflectance R 0 is obscured by aerosol scattering and absorption before it reaches the sensor Aerosol acts as a filter of surface reflectance and as a reflector solar radiation Aerosol as Reflector: R a = ( e -  – 1 ) P R = ( R 0 + ( e -  – 1 ) P ) e -  Aerosol as Filter: T a = e -  Surface reflectance R 0 The apparent reflectance , R , detected by the sensor is: R = ( R 0 + R a ) T a Under cloud-free conditions, the sensor receives the reflected radiation from surface and aerosols Both surface and aerosol signal varies independently in time and space Challenge: Separate the total received radiation into surface and aerosol components
  • 20. Apparent Surface Reflectance, R Aerosols will increase the apparent surface reflectance, R, if P/R 0 < 1. For this reason, the reflectance of ocean and dark vegetation increases with τ. When P/R 0 > 1, aerosols will decrease the surface reflectance. Accordingly, the brightness of clouds is reduced by overlying aerosols. At P~ R 0 the reflectance is unchanged by haze aerosols (e.g. soil and vegetation at 0.8 um). . At large τ (radiation equilibrium), both dark and bright surfaces asymptotically approach the ‘aerosol reflectance’, P The critical parameter whether aerosols will increase or decrease the apparent reflectance, R, is the ratio of aerosol angular reflectance, P, to bi-directional surface reflectance, R 0 , P/ R 0
  • 21. Reduced Reflectance Reflectance Reflectance Increased Reflectance
  • 22. Loss of Contrast The aerosol τ can also be estimated from the loss of surface contrast. Whether contrast decays fast or slow with increasing τ depends on the ratio of aerosol to surface reflectance, P/ R 0 Note: For horizontal vision against the horizon sky, P/R 0 = 1, contrast decays exponentially with τ, C/C 0 =e -τ .
  • 23. Obtaining Aerosol Optical Thickness from Excess Reflectance The perturbed surface reflectance, R, can be used to derive the the aerosol optical thickness, τ , provided that the true surface reflectance R 0 and the aerosol reflectance function, P are known. The excess reflectance due to aerosol is : R- R 0 = (P- R 0 )(1-e - τ ) and the optical depth is: For a black surface, R 0 =0 and optically thin aerosol, τ < 0.1, τ is proportional to excess radiance, τ =R/P. For τ > 0.1, the full logarithmic expression is needed. As R 0 increases, the same excess reflectance corresponds to increasing values of τ. When R 0 ~P the aerosol τ can not be retrieved since the excess reflectance is zero. For R 0 > P, the surface reflectance actually decreases with τ, so τ could be retrieved from the loss of reflectance, e.g. over bright clouds. The value of P is derived from fitting the observed and retrieved surface reflectance spectra. For summer light haze at 0.412 μm, P=0.38. Accurate and automatic retrieval of the relevant aerosol P is the most difficult part of the co-retrieval process. Iteratively calculating P from the estimated τ( λ) is one possibility.
  • 24. Aerosol Effects on Surface Color and Surface Effects on Aerosol Color The image was synthesized from the blue (0.412 μm), green (0.555 μm), and red (0.67 μm) channels of the 8 channel SeaWiFS sensor. Air scattering is removed to highlight the haze and surface reflectance.
  • 25. Aerosol Effect on Surface Color and Surface Effect on Aerosol Aerosols add to the reflectance and sometimes reduce the reflectance of surface objects Aerosols always diminish the contrast between dark a bright surface objects Haze and smoke aerosols change the color of surface objects to bluish while dust adds a yellowish tint. (Click on the Images to View) Dark surfaces like ocean and dark vegetation makes the aerosol appear bright . Bright surfaces like sand and clouds makes the aerosol invisible .
  • 26. SeaWiFS Images and Spectra at Four Wavelengths (Click on the Images to View) At blue (0.412) wavelength, the haze reflectance dominates over land surface reflectance. The surface features are obscured by haze. Air scattering (not included) would add further reflectance in the blue. The blue wavelength is well suited for aerosol detection over land but surface detection is difficult. At green (0.555) over land, the haze is reduced and the vegetation reflectance is increased . The surface features are obscured by haze but discernable. Due to the low reflectance of the sea, haze reflectance dominates. The green not well suited for haze detection over land but appropriate for haze detection over the ocean and for the detection of surface features. At red (0.67) wavelength over land, dark vegetation is distinctly different from brighter yellow-gray soil. The surface features, particularly water (R 0 <0.01), vegetation (R 0 <0.04), and soil (R 0 <0.30) are are easily distinguishable. Haze reflectance dominates over the ocean. Hence, the red is suitable for haze detection over dark vegetation and the ocean as well as for surface detection over land. In the near IR (0.865) over land, the surface reflectance is uniformly high (R 0 >0.30) over both vegetation and soil and haze is not discernable . Water is completely dark (R 0 <0.01) making land and water clearly distinguishable. The excess haze reflectance over land is barely perceptible but measurable over water. Hence, the near IR is suitable for haze detection over water and land-water differentiation.
  • 27. Aerosol effects on surface color and Surface effects on aerosol color The image was synthesized from the blue (0.412 μm), green (0.555 μm), and red (0.67 μm) channels of the 8 channel SeaWiFS sensor. Air scattering has been removed to highlight the haze and surface reflectance.
  • 28. Preprocessing Transform raw SeaWiFS data Georeferencing – warping data to geographic lat/lon coordinates with a pixel resolution of ~ 1.6 km Splicing – mosaic data from adjacent swaths to cover entire domain Rayleigh correction – remove scattering by atmospheric gases and convert to reflectance units Scattering angle correction – normalize all pixels to remove reflectance dependence on sun-target-sensor angles Result is daily apparent reflectance, R for all 8 channels
  • 29. General Approach: Co-Retrieval of Surface and Aerosol Reflectance Surface Reflectance Retrieval by Time Series Analysis (Sean Raffuse, MS Thesis 2003) Aerosol Retrieval over Land Radiative transfer model + Surface data Refined Surface Reflectance Iteration back to 1., 2. …
  • 30. Approach – Time Series Analysis For any location (pixel), the sensor detects a “clean” day periodically Aerosol scattering (haze) is near zero Pixel must also be free of other interferences Clouds Cloud shadows
  • 31. Methodology – Cloud shadows Clouds are easily detected by their high reflectance values Cloud shadows are found in the vicinity of clouds We enlarge the cloud mask by a three-pixel ‘halo’ to remove cloud shadows Cloud shadows reduce the apparent surface reflectance considerably in all channels
  • 32. Methodology – Preliminary anchor days Surface reflectance is retrieved for individual pixels from time series data (e.g. year) The procedure first identifies a set of ‘preliminary clear anchor’ days in a 17-day moving window The main interferences (clouds and haze) tend to increase the apparent surface reflectance, especially in the low wavelength channels The anchor day is chosen as the day with the minimum sum of the lowest four channels
  • 33. Results – Seasonal surface reflectance, Eastern US April 29, 2000, Day 120 July 18, 2000, Day 200 October 16, 2000, Day 290
  • 34. Results – Eight month animation
  • 35. Retrieval Procedures Rayleigh air scattering and gaseous absorption is removed first by the E. Vermote algorithm. Cloudy pixels are masked out since they obscure the surface and aerosol reflectance The remaining reflectance over land and water consists of the combined effect of aerosol scattering/absorption and surface reflectance. The goal of the co-retrieval is to separate the reflectance due to aerosol from surface reflectance