197.capital structure lecture

EBIT/EPS Analysis The tax benefit of debt Trade-off theory Practical considerations in the determination of capital structure CAPITAL STRUCTUR E Lecture 2

Capital structure Issues: EBIT-EPS analysis The tax shield benefit of debt The trade-off theory of capital structure P ractical considerations that affect the capital structure decision

Business Risk vs Financial Risk Business risk is the variability of a firm’s E arnings B efore I nterest and T axes ( EBIT ) Financial risk arises from the use of d ebt , which imposes a fixed cost in the form of interest payments = financial leverage .

EBIT/ EPS analysis Examine s how different capital structures affect earnings available to shareholders (EPS) and risk Question : for different levels of EBIT , how does financial leverage affect EPS ?

Risk and the Income Statement Sales Business – Variable costs Risk – Fixed costs EBIT – Interest expense Financial Earnings before taxes Risk – Taxes Net Income EPS = Net Income / no. of shares

Current and Proposed Capital Structures CURRENT PROPOSED Total assets $100 million $100 million Debt 0 million 50 million Equity 100 million 50 million Share price $25 $25 N o. of shares 4,000,000 2,000,000 Interest rate 10% 10% Note : for the purpose of simplicity we ignore taxes in this example

CURRENT CAPITAL STRUCTURE No Debt, 4 Million Shares ( m illions o mitted) EBIT 50% EBIT 50% BELOW ABOVE EXPECTED EXPECTED EXPECTED EBIT $6.00 $12.00 $18.00 – Int 0.00 0.00 0.00 NI $6.00 $12.00 $18.00 EPS $ 1.50 $ 3.00 $ 4.50

EBIT 50% EBIT 50% BELOW ABOVE EXPECTED EXPECTED EXPECTED EBIT $6.00 $12.00 $18.00 – Int 5 .00 5 .00 5 .00 NI $ 1 .00 $ 7 .00 $1 3 .00 EPS $ 0 .50 $ 3. 5 0 $ 6 .50 PROPOSED CAPITAL STRUCTURE 50% Debt (10% Coupon), 2 m illion Shares ( m illions o mitted)

EBIT/ EPS analysis Current versus Proposed Current (no debt) Proposed (with debt) EPS 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 3 6 9 10 12 15 18 EBIT For EBIT up to £ 10m, e quity financing is best For EBIT greater than £ 10m, debt financing is best

The impact of financial leverage If EBIT is > 10, the levered capital structure is preferable, ie EPS is higher If EBIT is < 10, the unlevered capital structure is preferable Conclusion : whether or not debt is beneficial is dependent upon the capacity of firms to generate EBIT

Indifference Level The break-even EBIT o ccurs where the lines cross At that level of EBIT both capital structures have the same EPS

Set the two EPS values equal to each other and solve for EBIT: Current (unlevered) Proposed (levered) (EBIT-I nt )(1- T ) = (EBIT-I nt )(1- T ) S S Since we assume T=0 (EBIT-I nt ) = (EBIT-I nt ) S S Breakeven Point

Break-even EBIT ( m illions o mitted)

The impact of financial leverage EPS U 1.5 3.0 4.5 EPS L 0.5 3.5 6.5 Spread U 3.0 Spread L 6.0 … t hat’s RISK EBIT 50% EBIT 50% BELOW ABOVE EXPECTED EXPECTED EXPECTED

The impact of financial leverage Leverage increases EPS if EBIT is high enough. At very low levels of EBIT, EPS can be negative – as interest on debt has priority over payments to shareholders. Financial leverage produces a broader spread of EPS values, ie shareholders’ returns are less predictable. This represents added RISK .

Summary: EBIT/ EPS analysis Indicates EBIT values when one capital structure may be preferred over another Analysis of expected EBIT can focus on the likelihood of actual EBIT exceeding the indifference point

Because interest on debt is deducted from EBIT before the amount of tax paid is calculated, there is a benefit to debt … in the form of lower corporate taxes Consider an example … The tax benefit of debt

Firm U nlevered Firm L evered No debt $10,000 of 12% Debt $20,000 Equity $10,000 in Equity 40% tax rate 40% tax rate The tax benefit of debt Both firms have same business risk and EBIT of $3,000. They differ only with respect to use of debt. U has $20K in Eq uity & L has $10K in Eq uity

EBIT $3,000 $3,000 Interest 0 1,200 EBT $3,000 $1,800 Taxes (40%) 1 ,200 720 NI $1,800 $1,080 ROE 9.0 % 10.8 % Firm U Firm L U; 1.8/20K = 9 % L; 1.08 / 10K = 10.8 % The tax benefit of debt

Why does financial leverag e increase the overall return to investors? I nvestors include both : Debt h olders (banks & bondholders) S hare holders Total return to investors : U: NI = $1,800. L: NI + Int erest = $1,080 + $1,200 = $2,280. Taxes paid : U: $1,200 L: $720 Difference = $480 More EBIT goes to investors in Firm L

Because the Government subsidizes debt, and the tax savings go to the investors. The tax savings are called the “ tax shield ” and grows proportionally with the increase of debt . Why does financial leverag e increase the overall return to investors?

Debt v ersus Equity Basic point. A firm’s cost of debt is always less than its cost of equity . Why? debt has seniority over equity debt has a fixed return the interest paid on debt is tax-deductible . It may appear a firm should use as much debt and as little equity as possible due to the cost difference … but this ignores the potential problems associated with debt. A Basic Capital Structure Theory

A Basic Capital Structure Theory There is a trade-off between the benefits of using debt and the costs of using debt. The use of debt creates a tax sh ield benefit from the interest on debt. The costs of using debt, besides the obvious interest cost, are the additional financial distress costs and agency costs arising from the use of debt financing.

The costs of financial distress associated with debt Bankruptcy costs including legal and accounting fees and a likely decline in the value of the firm’s assets Financial distress may also cause customers, suppliers, and management to take actions harmful to firm value. A Basic Capital Structure Theory

Agency costs arise from conflicts between shareholders and bondholders When you lend money to a business, you are allowing the shareholders to use that money in the course of running that business. Shareholders interests are different from your interests, because You (as lender) are interested in getting your money back Shareholders are interested in maximizing their wealth A Basic Capital Structure Theory

Agency costs associated with debt: Restrictive covenants meant to protect creditors can reduce firm efficiency. Monitoring costs may be expended to insure the firm abides by the restrictive covenants. As the level of debt financing increases, the contractual and monitoring costs are expected to increase. A Basic Capital Structure Theory

In addition to the variables described by the trade-off theory of capital structure, a variety of practical considerations also affect a firm’s capital structure decisions: Industry standards Creditor and rating agency requirements Maintaining excess borrowing capacity Profitability and the need for funds Managerial risk aversion Corporate control Capital structure: practical considerations

Industry s tandards It is natural to compare a firm’s capital structure to other firms in the same industry. Business risk is a significant factor impacting a firm’s capital structure and is heavily influenced by a firm’s industry. Evidence indicate firms’ capital structures tend toward an industry average. Practical c onsiderations

Creditor and Rating Agency Requirements Firms need to abide by restrictive covenants , which may include restrictions on the amount of future debt. Firms typically desire to appear financially strong to potential creditors in order to maintain borrowing capacity and low interest rates. Using less debt in capital structure helps to maintain this appearance. Practical c onsiderations

Maintaining Excess Borrowing Capacity Successful firms typically maintain excess borrowing capacity. This provides financial flexibility to react to investment opportunities. The maintenance of excess borrowing capacity causes firms to use less debt in their capital structure than otherwise. Practical c onsiderations

Profitability and the Need for Funds Profits can be paid out as dividends to sh areh olders or reinvested in the firm. If a firm generates high profits and reinvests a large proportion back into the firm, then it has a continuous source of internal funding. This will reduce the use of debt in the firm’s capital structure. Practical c onsiderations

Practical c onsiderations Managerial Risk Aversion Well-diversified s hare holders are likely to welcome the use of financial leverage. Management wealth is typically much more dependent upon the success of the company acting as their employer. To the extent management can act on their own desires, the firm is likely to have less debt in its capital structure than is desired by s hare holders.

Practical c onsiderations Corporate Control Controlling owners may desire to issue debt instead of ordinary shares since debt does not grant ownership rights. Firms with little financial leverage are often considered excellent takeover targets. Issuing more debt may help to avoid a corporate takeover.

EBIT/EPS analysis may be used to help determine whether it would be better to finance a project with debt or equity. Firms must trade-off the tax advantage to debt financing against the effect of debt on firm risk . Because of the tradeoff between the tax advantage to debt financing and risk, each firm has an optimal capital structure . Summary

Homework… EBIT/EPS Analysis A company is considering the following two capital structures: Plan A: sell 1,200,000 shares at £10 per share ( £ 12 million total) Plan B: issue £3.5 million in debt ( 9% coupon) and sell 850,000 shares at £10 per share ( £ 12 million total) Assume a corporate tax rate of 50% REQUIRED: (a) What is the break-even value of EBIT? (b) At this break-even value, what is the income statement for each capital structure plan and the EPS? (c) Draw a diagram to illustrate the trade-off between EBIT and EPS

197.capital structure lecture

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to 197.capital structure lecture (20)

More from kitturashmikittu (20)

197.capital structure lecture

Editor's Notes