SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Communications-Bridges
 Definition:
 Bridge: A Structure having a total length above 6m between the inner faces of the
dirt walls for carrying traffic or other moving loads over a depression, a obstruction
such as a channel, road or a railway.
• Minor Bridges: A bridge having a total length of 60m.
• Major bridges: A bridge having a total length more than 60m.
 Culvert:
A structure having a total length less than 6m between the inner faces of the
dirt walls.
 Foot bridge:
A bridge exclusively used to carry pedestrians, cycles and animals. width
shall not be less than 1500mm.
 High Level Bridge:
A bridge which carries the road way above the HFL of a
channel.
 Submersible bridge:
A submersible bridge or vented causeway is a bridge designed to
be overtopping during floods.
Communications-Bridges
 Width of carriage way:
The minimum clear width measured at right angles to the longitudinal centre
line of the bridge between the inside faces of roadway kerbs of wheel guards.
 Width of footway:
The minimum clear width any where within a height of 225mm above
the surface the footway or safety kerb. Normally 1.5 m from outer rounding of kerb to
inner fce of the parapet/railing.
 Safety Kerb:
A road way for usage of pedestrians. High Level Bridge: A bridge which carries
the road way above the HFL of a channel.
 Super elevation:
Transverse inclination given to the cross section of a carriageway on a horizontal
curve in order to reduce the effect of centrifugal force on a moving vehicle.
 Crust level of the bridge:
It shall be the highest of the following:
• Road crust level
• TBL of the canal
• Ground level
Communications-Bridges
 Submersible bridges and vented Causeways:
Railing shall be either collapsible or
removable.
 Crash Barriers:
Suitable designed crash barriers provided to safe guard against errant
vehicles. Metal or RCC.
• Multilane bridges and bridges on a urban area
• Flyover and interchanges
• ROBs across railway line
• Open sea, breakwaters, deep valleys
 Types:
• Vehicle cross barriers.
• Combination Railway/Vehicle Pedestrian Crash Barriers
• High Containment Barriers
Communications-Bridges
 Basic Data:
• Site plan with contours showing the flow direction of the canal, road way angle
(direction of skew if any), and the approach of the road for 200m on either side.
• Names of the village/town connected on either side.
• Hydraulic particulars of the canal both upstream and downstream.
• LS of the canal and the road for at least 250 m on either side of crossing.
• Cross sections of the canal and the road duly marking, Levels, such as BL, FSL,
TBL, GL, road crust level etc.,
• TPs Particulars, taken up to hard strata or to a minimum depth of 2m below
CBL or ground level which ever deeper with soil classification.
• Bearing capacity of the foundation strata.
Communications-Bridges
 Design Criteria:
• Hydrology of the drain or stream.
• Hydraulic design of
i. The stream or drain
ii. The hydraulic deign of the canal
• Structural Design.
i. Super structure
ii. Sub structure
References: IRC: 5-1998, 6-2000, 21-2000,78-2000, 83 (Part-1)-1987,
Communications-Bridges
 Design Criteria:
 Hydraulic design of
• Design of vent way
• Bridge crust level
• Afflux by Molesworth’s formula (max.50mm).
• Check for Scour
 Structural Design:
• Super structure
• Substructure.
References: IRC: 5-1998, 6-2000, 21-2000,78-2000, 83 (Part-1)-1987,
Bridges-Hydrology
 Hydrology of the stream or drain:
Table-1
Category Canal Discharge Stream Discharge Flood Frequency
in cumecs in cumecs
A 0.0 - 0.5 All discharges 1 in 25 years
B 0.5 – 15 0 – 150 1 in 50 years
Above 150 1 in 100 years
C 15 – 30 0 – 100 1 in 50 years
Above 150 1 in 100 yeas
D Above 30 0 - 150 1 in 100 years
Above 150 Detailed study
• IS: 7784 (part-1)-1973.
Communications-Bridges
Hydrology of the Drain/Stream: Detailed study in the case of drain discharge > 150
cumecs and canal discharge > 30 cumecs.
S.No. Type of Canal Catchment Area (CA) in ‘M’ in Sq. Miles
Up land Areas Deltaic Tracts
1. Main Canal Dickens’s formula, Rye's formula
Q = CM 3/4 Q = CM 2/3
C=1400 for CA<1.00 C=1000
C=1200 for CA=1 to 30 Velocity shall not exceed 10 ft/sec
C=1060 for CA=30 to 500
Q=7000 M1/2 for CA>500
Velocity in the barrel up to
12 to13 ft/sec
2. Branch Canal Q=CM 2/3
Q > 500 c/s C=1000 and Velocity<10’/sec same as upland area
3. Distributaries Q = CM 2/3 same as upland
area
Q < 500 c/s C=750 and Velocity< 10”/sec
• Lr. No. CDO/EE-C1/1084/83-3 dated 23.08.1983.
Bridges-Hydrology
 Hydrology of the stream or drain:
Table-1
Category Canal Discharge Stream Discharge Flood Frequency
in cumecs in cumecs
A 0.0 - 0.5 All discharges 1 in 25 years
B 0.5 – 15 0 – 150 1 in 50 years
Above 150 1 in 100 years
C 15 – 30 0 – 100 1 in 50 years
Above 150 1 in 100 yeas
D Above 30 0 - 150 1 in 100 years
Above 150 Detailed study
• IS: 7784 (part-1)-1973.
Bridges-Hydraulic design
 Linear Waterway:
Width of the water way between the extreme edges of water surface at the
highest flood level measured at right angle to the abutment faces.
Layce’s wetted perimeter (Pw) in meters using the formula
Pw = C(Q)1/2
Where C = a coefficient, a value 4.8 (4.5-6.3)and
Q is the flood discharge in cumecs
 Effective linear waterway:
Total width of the waterway at HFL minus the effective width of the
obstruction.
 Length of the bridge:
Over all length measured along the centre lline of the bridge between inner
faces of dirt walls.
Bridges-Hydraulic design
 Vertical Clearance:
• No part of the bearings shall be at a height less than 500mm
• Vertical clearance above the roadway in any traffic lane up to the lowest point 5.5
 Free board:
• It shall not be less than 750mm for approaches to high level bridges.
 Scour Depth:
• Mean scour depth is the depth (dm) below HFL or FSL in m
d = 1.34[q2 /f]1/3
Where, q = Discharge per meter width with or without concentration of flow in
cumecs,
f = Layce’s silt factor expressed as f = 1.76 (d m )1/2
dm = average grain size
Bed material Weighted mean diameter Value of silt
of particle in mm-dm factor- f
Coarse silt 0.040 0.350
Fine silt 0.081 0.500
Fine silt 0.120 0.600
Fine silt 0.158 0.700
Medium silt 0.233 0.850
Standard silt 0.323 1.000
Medium sand 0.505 1.250
Coarse sand 0.725 1.500
Fine bajira & sand 0.988 1.750
Heavy sand 1.290 -2.00 2.000 – 2.42
Bridges-Hydraulic design
Bridges-Hydraulic design
 Maximum Scour depth or Designed Scour Depth 9dorR) in m:
• Straight reaches for individual foundations without floor protection
In the vicinity of pier 2.00 d
Near abutments 1.27 d approaches retained
2.00 d scour all round
Floods with seismic combinations the values may be reduced by 0.9
For floor protection works, for raft foundations and shallow foundations
In straight reaches 1.27 d
At moderate bends 1.50 d
At sever bends 1.75 d m
At right angle bends 2.00 d
 Depth of Foundation:
• In Soils Up to safe bearing capacity or a minimum of 2.0m below the scour level or
the protected bed level.
• Hard rock with crushing strength 10 MPA: 600mm
• All others : 1500mm
Bridges – Structural design
 Loading Classification
• IRC Class AA Loading or Class 70-R Loading
• IRC Class A Loading
• IRC Class B Loading – adopted for temporary structures only
 Loads, Forces and Stresses:
1. Dead Loads 2. Live Loads 3. Snow loads
4. Impact and Dynamic Loads 5. Vehicle collusion load 6. wind load
7.Impact due to floating bodies 8. Water currents 9. Breaking force
10. Centrifugal forces 11. Buoyancy 12. Temperature effects
13. Deformation effects 14. Secondary effects 15.Errection effects
16. Seismic force 17. Wave pressure 19. Grade effects
19. Earth Pressure & LL surcharge
Bridges – Structural design
 Loads, Forces and Stresses:
i. Wind Load:
Horizontal force:
• For deck- area as seen in elevation including floor and railing, less area of perforation
in the hand railing
• For through or half trough structures- The area of elevation of the wind ward truss as
specified as above plus half the area of elevation above he deck level of all other
trusses or girders.
The intensity of wind force based on wind pressure and wind velocity.
• It shall be doubled for Guntur, Krihna, Godavri, Visakha, Vijayanagaram and
Srikakulam districts along the coast line
Wind Pressure and Wind Velocity
H V P H P V
0 80 40 30 147 141
2 91 52 40 155 157
4 100 63 50 162 171
6 107 73 60 168 183
8 113 82 70 173 193
10 118 91 80 177 202
15 128 107 90 180 210
20 136 119 100 183 217
25 142 130 110 186 224
Where W=Average height in m of the exposed suface above ground, bed level
or water level
V= Horizontal velocity f wind in Km per our at height H
P= Horizontal wing pressure in Kg/Sq.m at height H
(con….)
Bridges – Structural design
Bridges – Structural Design
 Wind Load:
• The lateral wind force against any exposed moving live load as acting 1.5m above road way
and shall be assumed to have the following value.
a. Highway bridges , ordinary : 300 Kgs/linear meter
b. Highway bridge carrying tramway: 450 Kgs/linear meter
• The bridge no carrying any live load when the wind velocity at deck level exceeds 130 Kms
per hour.
• The total assumed wind forces as calculated in accordance above cl.1 to 4, shall however ,
not less than 450 Kg per linear meter in plane of the load chord and 225 Kg per liner meter
in the plane of unloaded chord on through or half through truss, lattice or other similar
spans, and not les than 450 Kg per linear meter on deck slab.
• A wind pressure f 240 Kg/Sqm on the unloaded structure, applied as specified in cl1, 2,
shall be used if it produces greater stresses than those produced by the combined wind
forces as peer cl. 1, 2,4 or by the wind force as per cl.5
When the current strikes the pier at an angel it resolved in to
two components.
1.Presur parallel to pier- as above
2. Normal to the pier, acting on the area of the side elevation of the pier- as
with K as 1.5, except for circular piers which shall be 0.66.
Possible variation of water current direction inclined at (20±Ə) to length of pier
Bridge having pucca floor static force due to difference in head of 250mm between
the two faces of the pier.
Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses
Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses
 Longitudinal Forces:
 Force arising from any one or more of the flowing:
a. Tractate force due to acceleration
b. Breaking effect (invariably greater than tractate force)
c. Frictional resistance offered by the free bearings due to temperature change.
 The Breaking effect:
i. In the case of single lane or two lane bridges:
a. 20% of first train load plus 10% of the succeeding train or part thereof on one lane
only
b. If the entire train is not on the full span, breaking force shall be 20% of the loads
actually on the span,
ii In the case of more than two lanes:
• As in ‘A’ above for the first two lanes plus 5% of the loads on the lane in excess of
two.
• The force due to breaking effect acting at 1.2 m above parallel to road way.
Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses
• The change in vertical reaction at the bearings to be accounted for.
 Simply supported spans on unyielding supports:
• For spans of fixed and fee bearing other than Elastomeric bearings, longitudinal forces
Fixed bearing Free bearing
(i). Fh-µ(Rq+Rg) µ(Rq+Rg)
Or (ii). Fh/2 + µ(Rg+Rq) µ(Rg+Rq)
Where Fh= Applied horizontal force
Rg= Reaction due to dead load at free end
Rq= Reaction due to live load at fee end
µ = a coefficient
For steel roller bearings 0.03
concrete roller bearings 0.05
sliding bearings 0.30 to 0.50
Teflon on stainless steel 0.03 to 0.05
 Plate bearings up to 15m span for RCC or Pre stressed super structure. :
Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses
 Centrifugal Forces:
 Determined from the following formula:
C = W V2/ 127 R
Where C= Centrifugal force in tonnes
W= live load in tonnes in case of wheel loads and tonnes per linear meter in
case of UDL
V= Designed seed in km per hour
R= Radius of curvature in meters
 Consider to act at a height of 1.2 m above the level of the carriageway :
 No increase for impact effect.
Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses
 Buoyancy:
 For full Buoyancy a reduction is made in the gross weight of the member:
• Member displaces water only in shallow foundations, the reduction in weight equal to
the volume of displaced water.
• Member under consideration displaces water and also silt and sand (deep piers and
abutment), the upward pressure causing the reduction in weight shall be
a. Full hydrostatic pressure due to a depth of water equal to the difference in level
between the free surface and the foundation
b. Upward pressure due to the submerged weight of the silt or sand in accordance
with Rankin's theory.
• In design of submerged masonry or concrete , the buoyancy through pore pressure
may be limited to 15% of full buoyancy.
• In case of submerged bridgeless, the full buoyancy of super structure be considered.
Bridges – Structural Design
 Earth Pressure:
• In accordance with any rational theory. Coulomb’s theory is accepted.
• All abutments and return walls shall be designed for a live load surcharge equivalent to
1.2m earth fill.
 Approach slab:
• RCC approach slab with 12mm dia. 150mm c/c in each direction both at top and bottom
as reinforcement in concrete grade in M30 for the entire width of road way for a length not
less than 3.5m.
 Temperature:
 Seismic Forces:
• Both the horizontal and vertical forces acting simultaneously.
• Horizontal seismic force:
• Feq = α β λ G
• Where α= Horizontal seismic coefficient.
• β= Coefficient depending on the soil foundation
• λ= coefficient - important bridges… 1.5 and other bridges..1.0
• Horizontal Seismic coefficient α;
Zone I II III IV V
α 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.08
• Seismic forces shall not be considered in the direction of live load but in the direction
perpendicular to the traffic.
Bridges – Structural Design
Bridges – Structural Design
 Super structure:
 Design of Deck slab or girder
• As per MOST drawings
• IRC:6-2000, IRC: 21-2000
 Sub structure:
• Piers:
• Minimum thickness 1000mm
• All abutments and return walls shall be designed adopting coulomb’s/Rankin’s theory,
with top width 500mm.
• All abutments and return walls shall be designed for a live load surcharge equivalent to
1.2m earth fill.
 Approach slab:
• RCC approach slab with 12mm dia. 150mm c/c in each direction both at top and
bottom as reinforcement in concrete grade in M30 for the entire width of road way for
a length not less than 3.5m.
1Bridges.ppt
Bridges – Foundations
 Factor of safety:
 Factor of safety on Soils … 2.5.
 Factor of safety on Rock .… 6 to8
 Allowable Settlement (differential settlement)
• Not exceeding 1 in400 of the distance between two foundations.
 Permissible Tension:
• No tension on soils
• In rock the base area to be reduced to a size where no tension will occur such reduced area not < 67%
 Factor of safety for stability:
• For open foundations:
With out Seismic with Seismic
i. Against overturning 2 1.5
ii. Against sliding 1.5 1.25
iii. Against deep-seated failure 1.25 1.15
 Frictional coefficient Tan Ø, Ø being angle friction:
• Between soil and concrete … 0.5
• Between rock and concrete…0.8 for good rock and 0.7 for fissured rock.
Bridges – Foundations
 Well Foundations:
 Cutting edge: In mild steel not < 40 Kg. per cum.
 Well Curb:
• In variably in RCC grade not < M25 with minimum steel 72 Kg. per cum.
• The internal angle 300 to 370
• In case of blasting anticipated steel plate of thickness not < 10mm up to top of well curb.
 Bottom Plug:
• Top shall be 300mm above top of kerb with suitable sump (shear Key) below the level of cutting
edge.
• CC with minimum cement 330 Kg. per cum. Increase cement for Tremie concrete.
 Filling of well:
• Refill with excavated earth or sand
 Plug over fill:
 300mm thick in CC M15.
 Well Cap:
• Bottom of well cap be below LWL
• Reinforcement from steining shall be anchored in well cap
• Design on any acceptable rational method.
 Sinking of well:
• Sinking of well can not be started till the cured for at least 48 hours.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

PPTX
Bridge Engineering
PDF
Construction of a High Level Bridge
PDF
module20120PPT.pdf
PPT
unit-5-bridge-engg-components-classification-data-collection-site-selection-e...
PDF
Investigation for bridge construction
PPTX
Basic Terms of Bridges by Krunal R Thanki
PDF
“HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGICAL IMPACT ON BRIDGE”
PPT
Bridge
Bridge Engineering
Construction of a High Level Bridge
module20120PPT.pdf
unit-5-bridge-engg-components-classification-data-collection-site-selection-e...
Investigation for bridge construction
Basic Terms of Bridges by Krunal R Thanki
“HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGICAL IMPACT ON BRIDGE”
Bridge

Similar to 1Bridges.ppt (20)

PPT
Bridge engg mechanism and hydraulics.ppt
PPT
introductiontobridges07-08-090507223401-phpapp02.ppt
PDF
MECHANIZED CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR URBAN ROAD BRIDGE
PDF
introductiontobridges07-08-090507223401-phpapp02.pdf
PDF
REVIEW PAPER ON “HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGICAL IMPACT ON BRIDGE”
PPTX
Bridge and Railway Engineering.pptx
PPTX
Introductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-converted
PDF
Design manual-for-small-bridges
PPT
Hydrology and hydraulics for design design
PDF
MODULE-III INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING BTCVC702
PPTX
Tom Saad of FHWA Chicago HS for Agricultural Sciences Shadow day 02-08-12
PPTX
unit 4 vsem cross drainage works & srturcture water resource engineering Siph...
PPTX
Transport enggineering
PPTX
WHAT IS CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS AND WHAT ARE ITS HYDRAULIC DESIGN ASPECTS
PPTX
Canal irrigation
PPTX
Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)
PDF
PPTX
Unit -2 Loads.pptx
PDF
IRJET- Parametric Study on Behaviour of RCC Box Culvert for Dynamic Loading
PDF
T B Banerjee Presentation.pdf
Bridge engg mechanism and hydraulics.ppt
introductiontobridges07-08-090507223401-phpapp02.ppt
MECHANIZED CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR URBAN ROAD BRIDGE
introductiontobridges07-08-090507223401-phpapp02.pdf
REVIEW PAPER ON “HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGICAL IMPACT ON BRIDGE”
Bridge and Railway Engineering.pptx
Introductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-converted
Design manual-for-small-bridges
Hydrology and hydraulics for design design
MODULE-III INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING BTCVC702
Tom Saad of FHWA Chicago HS for Agricultural Sciences Shadow day 02-08-12
unit 4 vsem cross drainage works & srturcture water resource engineering Siph...
Transport enggineering
WHAT IS CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS AND WHAT ARE ITS HYDRAULIC DESIGN ASPECTS
Canal irrigation
Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)
Unit -2 Loads.pptx
IRJET- Parametric Study on Behaviour of RCC Box Culvert for Dynamic Loading
T B Banerjee Presentation.pdf
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
introduction to datamining and warehousing
PDF
737-MAX_SRG.pdf student reference guides
PDF
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
PDF
Integrating Fractal Dimension and Time Series Analysis for Optimized Hyperspe...
PPT
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
PPTX
Nature of X-rays, X- Ray Equipment, Fluoroscopy
PDF
Abrasive, erosive and cavitation wear.pdf
PDF
COURSE DESCRIPTOR OF SURVEYING R24 SYLLABUS
PPTX
UNIT - 3 Total quality Management .pptx
PPTX
Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
PPT
A5_DistSysCh1.ppt_INTRODUCTION TO DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS
PPTX
communication and presentation skills 01
PDF
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
PDF
SMART SIGNAL TIMING FOR URBAN INTERSECTIONS USING REAL-TIME VEHICLE DETECTI...
PDF
Categorization of Factors Affecting Classification Algorithms Selection
PDF
BIO-INSPIRED HORMONAL MODULATION AND ADAPTIVE ORCHESTRATION IN S-AI-GPT
PDF
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
PDF
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
PPTX
Safety Seminar civil to be ensured for safe working.
introduction to datamining and warehousing
737-MAX_SRG.pdf student reference guides
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
Integrating Fractal Dimension and Time Series Analysis for Optimized Hyperspe...
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
Nature of X-rays, X- Ray Equipment, Fluoroscopy
Abrasive, erosive and cavitation wear.pdf
COURSE DESCRIPTOR OF SURVEYING R24 SYLLABUS
UNIT - 3 Total quality Management .pptx
Artificial Intelligence
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
A5_DistSysCh1.ppt_INTRODUCTION TO DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS
communication and presentation skills 01
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
SMART SIGNAL TIMING FOR URBAN INTERSECTIONS USING REAL-TIME VEHICLE DETECTI...
Categorization of Factors Affecting Classification Algorithms Selection
BIO-INSPIRED HORMONAL MODULATION AND ADAPTIVE ORCHESTRATION IN S-AI-GPT
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
Safety Seminar civil to be ensured for safe working.
Ad

1Bridges.ppt

  • 1. Communications-Bridges  Definition:  Bridge: A Structure having a total length above 6m between the inner faces of the dirt walls for carrying traffic or other moving loads over a depression, a obstruction such as a channel, road or a railway. • Minor Bridges: A bridge having a total length of 60m. • Major bridges: A bridge having a total length more than 60m.  Culvert: A structure having a total length less than 6m between the inner faces of the dirt walls.  Foot bridge: A bridge exclusively used to carry pedestrians, cycles and animals. width shall not be less than 1500mm.  High Level Bridge: A bridge which carries the road way above the HFL of a channel.  Submersible bridge: A submersible bridge or vented causeway is a bridge designed to be overtopping during floods.
  • 2. Communications-Bridges  Width of carriage way: The minimum clear width measured at right angles to the longitudinal centre line of the bridge between the inside faces of roadway kerbs of wheel guards.  Width of footway: The minimum clear width any where within a height of 225mm above the surface the footway or safety kerb. Normally 1.5 m from outer rounding of kerb to inner fce of the parapet/railing.  Safety Kerb: A road way for usage of pedestrians. High Level Bridge: A bridge which carries the road way above the HFL of a channel.  Super elevation: Transverse inclination given to the cross section of a carriageway on a horizontal curve in order to reduce the effect of centrifugal force on a moving vehicle.  Crust level of the bridge: It shall be the highest of the following: • Road crust level • TBL of the canal • Ground level
  • 3. Communications-Bridges  Submersible bridges and vented Causeways: Railing shall be either collapsible or removable.  Crash Barriers: Suitable designed crash barriers provided to safe guard against errant vehicles. Metal or RCC. • Multilane bridges and bridges on a urban area • Flyover and interchanges • ROBs across railway line • Open sea, breakwaters, deep valleys  Types: • Vehicle cross barriers. • Combination Railway/Vehicle Pedestrian Crash Barriers • High Containment Barriers
  • 4. Communications-Bridges  Basic Data: • Site plan with contours showing the flow direction of the canal, road way angle (direction of skew if any), and the approach of the road for 200m on either side. • Names of the village/town connected on either side. • Hydraulic particulars of the canal both upstream and downstream. • LS of the canal and the road for at least 250 m on either side of crossing. • Cross sections of the canal and the road duly marking, Levels, such as BL, FSL, TBL, GL, road crust level etc., • TPs Particulars, taken up to hard strata or to a minimum depth of 2m below CBL or ground level which ever deeper with soil classification. • Bearing capacity of the foundation strata.
  • 5. Communications-Bridges  Design Criteria: • Hydrology of the drain or stream. • Hydraulic design of i. The stream or drain ii. The hydraulic deign of the canal • Structural Design. i. Super structure ii. Sub structure References: IRC: 5-1998, 6-2000, 21-2000,78-2000, 83 (Part-1)-1987,
  • 6. Communications-Bridges  Design Criteria:  Hydraulic design of • Design of vent way • Bridge crust level • Afflux by Molesworth’s formula (max.50mm). • Check for Scour  Structural Design: • Super structure • Substructure. References: IRC: 5-1998, 6-2000, 21-2000,78-2000, 83 (Part-1)-1987,
  • 7. Bridges-Hydrology  Hydrology of the stream or drain: Table-1 Category Canal Discharge Stream Discharge Flood Frequency in cumecs in cumecs A 0.0 - 0.5 All discharges 1 in 25 years B 0.5 – 15 0 – 150 1 in 50 years Above 150 1 in 100 years C 15 – 30 0 – 100 1 in 50 years Above 150 1 in 100 yeas D Above 30 0 - 150 1 in 100 years Above 150 Detailed study • IS: 7784 (part-1)-1973.
  • 8. Communications-Bridges Hydrology of the Drain/Stream: Detailed study in the case of drain discharge > 150 cumecs and canal discharge > 30 cumecs. S.No. Type of Canal Catchment Area (CA) in ‘M’ in Sq. Miles Up land Areas Deltaic Tracts 1. Main Canal Dickens’s formula, Rye's formula Q = CM 3/4 Q = CM 2/3 C=1400 for CA<1.00 C=1000 C=1200 for CA=1 to 30 Velocity shall not exceed 10 ft/sec C=1060 for CA=30 to 500 Q=7000 M1/2 for CA>500 Velocity in the barrel up to 12 to13 ft/sec 2. Branch Canal Q=CM 2/3 Q > 500 c/s C=1000 and Velocity<10’/sec same as upland area 3. Distributaries Q = CM 2/3 same as upland area Q < 500 c/s C=750 and Velocity< 10”/sec • Lr. No. CDO/EE-C1/1084/83-3 dated 23.08.1983.
  • 9. Bridges-Hydrology  Hydrology of the stream or drain: Table-1 Category Canal Discharge Stream Discharge Flood Frequency in cumecs in cumecs A 0.0 - 0.5 All discharges 1 in 25 years B 0.5 – 15 0 – 150 1 in 50 years Above 150 1 in 100 years C 15 – 30 0 – 100 1 in 50 years Above 150 1 in 100 yeas D Above 30 0 - 150 1 in 100 years Above 150 Detailed study • IS: 7784 (part-1)-1973.
  • 10. Bridges-Hydraulic design  Linear Waterway: Width of the water way between the extreme edges of water surface at the highest flood level measured at right angle to the abutment faces. Layce’s wetted perimeter (Pw) in meters using the formula Pw = C(Q)1/2 Where C = a coefficient, a value 4.8 (4.5-6.3)and Q is the flood discharge in cumecs  Effective linear waterway: Total width of the waterway at HFL minus the effective width of the obstruction.  Length of the bridge: Over all length measured along the centre lline of the bridge between inner faces of dirt walls.
  • 11. Bridges-Hydraulic design  Vertical Clearance: • No part of the bearings shall be at a height less than 500mm • Vertical clearance above the roadway in any traffic lane up to the lowest point 5.5  Free board: • It shall not be less than 750mm for approaches to high level bridges.  Scour Depth: • Mean scour depth is the depth (dm) below HFL or FSL in m d = 1.34[q2 /f]1/3 Where, q = Discharge per meter width with or without concentration of flow in cumecs, f = Layce’s silt factor expressed as f = 1.76 (d m )1/2 dm = average grain size
  • 12. Bed material Weighted mean diameter Value of silt of particle in mm-dm factor- f Coarse silt 0.040 0.350 Fine silt 0.081 0.500 Fine silt 0.120 0.600 Fine silt 0.158 0.700 Medium silt 0.233 0.850 Standard silt 0.323 1.000 Medium sand 0.505 1.250 Coarse sand 0.725 1.500 Fine bajira & sand 0.988 1.750 Heavy sand 1.290 -2.00 2.000 – 2.42 Bridges-Hydraulic design
  • 13. Bridges-Hydraulic design  Maximum Scour depth or Designed Scour Depth 9dorR) in m: • Straight reaches for individual foundations without floor protection In the vicinity of pier 2.00 d Near abutments 1.27 d approaches retained 2.00 d scour all round Floods with seismic combinations the values may be reduced by 0.9 For floor protection works, for raft foundations and shallow foundations In straight reaches 1.27 d At moderate bends 1.50 d At sever bends 1.75 d m At right angle bends 2.00 d  Depth of Foundation: • In Soils Up to safe bearing capacity or a minimum of 2.0m below the scour level or the protected bed level. • Hard rock with crushing strength 10 MPA: 600mm • All others : 1500mm
  • 14. Bridges – Structural design  Loading Classification • IRC Class AA Loading or Class 70-R Loading • IRC Class A Loading • IRC Class B Loading – adopted for temporary structures only  Loads, Forces and Stresses: 1. Dead Loads 2. Live Loads 3. Snow loads 4. Impact and Dynamic Loads 5. Vehicle collusion load 6. wind load 7.Impact due to floating bodies 8. Water currents 9. Breaking force 10. Centrifugal forces 11. Buoyancy 12. Temperature effects 13. Deformation effects 14. Secondary effects 15.Errection effects 16. Seismic force 17. Wave pressure 19. Grade effects 19. Earth Pressure & LL surcharge
  • 15. Bridges – Structural design  Loads, Forces and Stresses: i. Wind Load: Horizontal force: • For deck- area as seen in elevation including floor and railing, less area of perforation in the hand railing • For through or half trough structures- The area of elevation of the wind ward truss as specified as above plus half the area of elevation above he deck level of all other trusses or girders. The intensity of wind force based on wind pressure and wind velocity. • It shall be doubled for Guntur, Krihna, Godavri, Visakha, Vijayanagaram and Srikakulam districts along the coast line
  • 16. Wind Pressure and Wind Velocity H V P H P V 0 80 40 30 147 141 2 91 52 40 155 157 4 100 63 50 162 171 6 107 73 60 168 183 8 113 82 70 173 193 10 118 91 80 177 202 15 128 107 90 180 210 20 136 119 100 183 217 25 142 130 110 186 224 Where W=Average height in m of the exposed suface above ground, bed level or water level V= Horizontal velocity f wind in Km per our at height H P= Horizontal wing pressure in Kg/Sq.m at height H (con….) Bridges – Structural design
  • 17. Bridges – Structural Design  Wind Load: • The lateral wind force against any exposed moving live load as acting 1.5m above road way and shall be assumed to have the following value. a. Highway bridges , ordinary : 300 Kgs/linear meter b. Highway bridge carrying tramway: 450 Kgs/linear meter • The bridge no carrying any live load when the wind velocity at deck level exceeds 130 Kms per hour. • The total assumed wind forces as calculated in accordance above cl.1 to 4, shall however , not less than 450 Kg per linear meter in plane of the load chord and 225 Kg per liner meter in the plane of unloaded chord on through or half through truss, lattice or other similar spans, and not les than 450 Kg per linear meter on deck slab. • A wind pressure f 240 Kg/Sqm on the unloaded structure, applied as specified in cl1, 2, shall be used if it produces greater stresses than those produced by the combined wind forces as peer cl. 1, 2,4 or by the wind force as per cl.5
  • 18. When the current strikes the pier at an angel it resolved in to two components. 1.Presur parallel to pier- as above 2. Normal to the pier, acting on the area of the side elevation of the pier- as with K as 1.5, except for circular piers which shall be 0.66. Possible variation of water current direction inclined at (20±Ə) to length of pier Bridge having pucca floor static force due to difference in head of 250mm between the two faces of the pier. Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses
  • 19. Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses  Longitudinal Forces:  Force arising from any one or more of the flowing: a. Tractate force due to acceleration b. Breaking effect (invariably greater than tractate force) c. Frictional resistance offered by the free bearings due to temperature change.  The Breaking effect: i. In the case of single lane or two lane bridges: a. 20% of first train load plus 10% of the succeeding train or part thereof on one lane only b. If the entire train is not on the full span, breaking force shall be 20% of the loads actually on the span, ii In the case of more than two lanes: • As in ‘A’ above for the first two lanes plus 5% of the loads on the lane in excess of two. • The force due to breaking effect acting at 1.2 m above parallel to road way.
  • 20. Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses • The change in vertical reaction at the bearings to be accounted for.  Simply supported spans on unyielding supports: • For spans of fixed and fee bearing other than Elastomeric bearings, longitudinal forces Fixed bearing Free bearing (i). Fh-µ(Rq+Rg) µ(Rq+Rg) Or (ii). Fh/2 + µ(Rg+Rq) µ(Rg+Rq) Where Fh= Applied horizontal force Rg= Reaction due to dead load at free end Rq= Reaction due to live load at fee end µ = a coefficient For steel roller bearings 0.03 concrete roller bearings 0.05 sliding bearings 0.30 to 0.50 Teflon on stainless steel 0.03 to 0.05  Plate bearings up to 15m span for RCC or Pre stressed super structure. :
  • 21. Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses  Centrifugal Forces:  Determined from the following formula: C = W V2/ 127 R Where C= Centrifugal force in tonnes W= live load in tonnes in case of wheel loads and tonnes per linear meter in case of UDL V= Designed seed in km per hour R= Radius of curvature in meters  Consider to act at a height of 1.2 m above the level of the carriageway :  No increase for impact effect.
  • 22. Bridges – Loads, Forces,& Stresses  Buoyancy:  For full Buoyancy a reduction is made in the gross weight of the member: • Member displaces water only in shallow foundations, the reduction in weight equal to the volume of displaced water. • Member under consideration displaces water and also silt and sand (deep piers and abutment), the upward pressure causing the reduction in weight shall be a. Full hydrostatic pressure due to a depth of water equal to the difference in level between the free surface and the foundation b. Upward pressure due to the submerged weight of the silt or sand in accordance with Rankin's theory. • In design of submerged masonry or concrete , the buoyancy through pore pressure may be limited to 15% of full buoyancy. • In case of submerged bridgeless, the full buoyancy of super structure be considered.
  • 23. Bridges – Structural Design  Earth Pressure: • In accordance with any rational theory. Coulomb’s theory is accepted. • All abutments and return walls shall be designed for a live load surcharge equivalent to 1.2m earth fill.  Approach slab: • RCC approach slab with 12mm dia. 150mm c/c in each direction both at top and bottom as reinforcement in concrete grade in M30 for the entire width of road way for a length not less than 3.5m.  Temperature:  Seismic Forces: • Both the horizontal and vertical forces acting simultaneously. • Horizontal seismic force: • Feq = α β λ G • Where α= Horizontal seismic coefficient. • β= Coefficient depending on the soil foundation • λ= coefficient - important bridges… 1.5 and other bridges..1.0 • Horizontal Seismic coefficient α;
  • 24. Zone I II III IV V α 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.08 • Seismic forces shall not be considered in the direction of live load but in the direction perpendicular to the traffic. Bridges – Structural Design
  • 25. Bridges – Structural Design  Super structure:  Design of Deck slab or girder • As per MOST drawings • IRC:6-2000, IRC: 21-2000  Sub structure: • Piers: • Minimum thickness 1000mm • All abutments and return walls shall be designed adopting coulomb’s/Rankin’s theory, with top width 500mm. • All abutments and return walls shall be designed for a live load surcharge equivalent to 1.2m earth fill.  Approach slab: • RCC approach slab with 12mm dia. 150mm c/c in each direction both at top and bottom as reinforcement in concrete grade in M30 for the entire width of road way for a length not less than 3.5m.
  • 27. Bridges – Foundations  Factor of safety:  Factor of safety on Soils … 2.5.  Factor of safety on Rock .… 6 to8  Allowable Settlement (differential settlement) • Not exceeding 1 in400 of the distance between two foundations.  Permissible Tension: • No tension on soils • In rock the base area to be reduced to a size where no tension will occur such reduced area not < 67%  Factor of safety for stability: • For open foundations: With out Seismic with Seismic i. Against overturning 2 1.5 ii. Against sliding 1.5 1.25 iii. Against deep-seated failure 1.25 1.15  Frictional coefficient Tan Ø, Ø being angle friction: • Between soil and concrete … 0.5 • Between rock and concrete…0.8 for good rock and 0.7 for fissured rock.
  • 28. Bridges – Foundations  Well Foundations:  Cutting edge: In mild steel not < 40 Kg. per cum.  Well Curb: • In variably in RCC grade not < M25 with minimum steel 72 Kg. per cum. • The internal angle 300 to 370 • In case of blasting anticipated steel plate of thickness not < 10mm up to top of well curb.  Bottom Plug: • Top shall be 300mm above top of kerb with suitable sump (shear Key) below the level of cutting edge. • CC with minimum cement 330 Kg. per cum. Increase cement for Tremie concrete.  Filling of well: • Refill with excavated earth or sand  Plug over fill:  300mm thick in CC M15.  Well Cap: • Bottom of well cap be below LWL • Reinforcement from steining shall be anchored in well cap • Design on any acceptable rational method.  Sinking of well: • Sinking of well can not be started till the cured for at least 48 hours.