![Your paper should be at least two pages in length, excluding
title and reference pages, and formatted according to APA style
as outlined in the Writing Center. Visit the Writing Center and
view this Sample Annotated Bibliography (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site. for an example of correct
annotated bibliography form.].
Description:
Describes the Case Study That Will Be Researched
Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately describes the case
study that will be researched.
Proficient - Describes the case study that will be researched.
Minor details are missing or inaccurate.
Basic - Minimally describes the case study that will be
researched. Relevant details are missing or inaccurate.
Below Expectations -Attempts to describe the case study that
will be researched; however, significant details are missing or
inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The description of the case study that will
be researched is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Provides an Annotated Bibliography of the Scholarly Sources to
Be Used for the Final Paper
Distinguished - Provides a thorough annotated bibliography of
at least six scholarly sources to be used for the Final Paper.
Proficient - Provides an annotated bibliography of six scholarly
sources to be used for the Final Paper. Minor details are
missing.
Basic - Provides a brief annotated bibliography of six sources to
be used for the Final Paper. Some of the sources are not
scholarly and/or relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an annotated
bibliography of the scholarly sources to be used for the Final
Paper; however, most of the sources are not scholarly and/or
significant details are missing.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/1runningheadtitletitle4week3-assignmentannotatedbibli-221224055555-78c3db02/85/1Running-head-TitleTITLE4Week-3-AssignmentAnnotated-Bibli-docx-2-320.jpg)
1Running head TitleTITLE4Week 3 - AssignmentAnnotated Bibli.docx
- 1. 1 Running head: Title TITLE 4Week 3 - AssignmentAnnotated Bibliography on Institutional Code of Ethics Scenario No. 3: Institutional Code of EthicsProject Assignment: Codes of ethics are standards that outline how individuals or groups of people are to act. The healthcare/medical community has its own code of ethics, which is outlined in the American Medical Association’s Code of Medical Ethics. Review the following: · AMA’s Code of Medical Ethics here: American Medical Association. (2013). AMA’s code of medical ethics (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician- resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page. · Three local or regional hospitals’ codes of ethics. · Various scholarly research on healthcare codes of ethics (at least seven additional sources). Find at least six scholarly sources that are connected with the ethical dilemma and/or case-related content in Scenario No. 3: Institutional Code of Ethics (see above. Provide an annotated bibliography of these six (or more) sources. Your annotated bibliography must contain the following elements (and possibly more): · APA-formatted citations · A description of the article: · What does it address? · What were the outcomes or conclusions? · How does this apply to your case study analysis? · Does it provide insights into an ethical concept? · Is it a similar case to the one you are analyzing? · Does it offer suggestions from best practices in ethical decision making?
- 2. Your paper should be at least two pages in length, excluding title and reference pages, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center. Visit the Writing Center and view this Sample Annotated Bibliography (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for an example of correct annotated bibliography form.]. Description: Describes the Case Study That Will Be Researched Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately describes the case study that will be researched. Proficient - Describes the case study that will be researched. Minor details are missing or inaccurate. Basic - Minimally describes the case study that will be researched. Relevant details are missing or inaccurate. Below Expectations -Attempts to describe the case study that will be researched; however, significant details are missing or inaccurate. Non-Performance - The description of the case study that will be researched is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Provides an Annotated Bibliography of the Scholarly Sources to Be Used for the Final Paper Distinguished - Provides a thorough annotated bibliography of at least six scholarly sources to be used for the Final Paper. Proficient - Provides an annotated bibliography of six scholarly sources to be used for the Final Paper. Minor details are missing. Basic - Provides a brief annotated bibliography of six sources to be used for the Final Paper. Some of the sources are not scholarly and/or relevant details are missing. Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an annotated bibliography of the scholarly sources to be used for the Final Paper; however, most of the sources are not scholarly and/or significant details are missing.
- 3. Non-Performance - The annotated bibliography of scholarly sources to be used for the Final Paper is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Describes Each Article, What iI Addresses, the Outcomes or Conclusions, and How It Applies to the Case Study Analysis Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the purpose of each article, what it addresses, the outcomes or conclusions, and how it applies to the case study analysis. Proficient - Describes the purpose of each article, what it addresses, the outcomes or conclusions, and how it applies to the case study analysis. Minor details are missing ,unclear, or slightly irrelevant to the case study. Basic - Partially describes the purpose of each article, what it addresses, the outcomes or conclusions, and how it applies to the case study analysis. Relevant details are missing, unclear, or somewhat irrelevant to the case study. Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the purpose of each article, what it addresses, the outcomes or conclusions, and how it applies to the case study analysis; however, significant details are missing, unclear, and/or irrelevant to the case study. Non-Performance - The description of each article and how it would apply to the case study analysis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Critical Thinking – Evidence Distinguished - Employs persuasive information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly. Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic. Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. Below Expectations - Displays information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or
- 4. relevance. Neglects the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Critical Thinking – Explanation of Issues Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding. Proficient - Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding. Basic - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding. Below Expectations - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand. Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand. Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader. Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
- 5. lacks the components described in the instructions. APA Formatting Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page. Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Page Requirement Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages. Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Resource Requirement Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Proficient - Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
- 6. Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly. Below Expectations - Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly. 1 Running head: Title TITLE 4Week 4 - Assignment Stark Law Case Study: Review this scenario: Two physicians, Dr. S. and Dr. V., leased a nuclear camera so they would no longer have to refer their patients to the local hospital for nuclear imaging. Faced with the prospect of losing over a third of its $2,274,094 in annual gross nuclear medicine revenues, the hospital responded by threatening to revoke the doctors’ admitting privileges. Lengthy negotiations ensued, at the end of which the hospital agreed to sublease the camera from the two physicians; the camera remained at the physicians’ offices but other physicians with privileges at the hospital could use it. Four other local physicians who provided the same or similar services to patients as Dr. S. and Dr. V. brought a qui tam action alleging that the sublease violated the Anti-Kickback and Stark Acts and that the defendants falsely certified compliance with those laws in connection with claims submitted to Medicare in violation of the False Claims Act. (Please note: This is an actual court case and an Internet search may uncover the actual case details. You are prohibited from utilizing any source materials associated with this case. Use of any related materials will result in a reduction of points on this assignment. This assignment is being graded on your ability to
- 7. critically think—on your own recognizance—based on your comprehension of the knowledge provided in this week’s learning materials.) Instructions: Carefully review Chapter 7 of your textbook and research Stark Law. Given this scenario, analyze whether the actions of Dr. S. and Dr. V. violated Stark Law. Provide solid evidence supporting your decision by utilizing information from the University Library as well as the law itself. Your paper must be two to three pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages; include at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook; and be written in APA format. Description: Analyzes Whether the Actions of Drs. S. and V. Violated Stark Law Distinguished - Comprehensively analyzes whether the actions of Drs. S. and V. violated Stark Law. Proficient -Analyzes whether the actions of Drs. S. and V. violated Stark Law. Minor details are missing or unclear. Basic - Partially analyzes whether the actions of Drs. S. and V. violated Stark Law. Relevant details are missing or unclear. Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze whether the actions of Drs. S. and V. violated Stark Law; however, significant details are missing or unclear. Non-Performance - The analysis of whether the actions of Drs. S. and V. violated Stark Law is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Provides Solid Evidence Supporting the Decision Distinguished - Thoroughly provides solid evidence supporting the decision, fully utilizing information from the University Library and the law itself. Proficient - Provides evidence supporting the decision, utilizing information from th University Library and the law itself. Minor details are missing or unclear. Basic - Provides limited evidence supporting the decision,
- 8. minimally utilizing information from the Below Expectations - Attempts to provide evidence supporting the decision; however, does not utilize information from the University Library and the law itself and significant details are missing and/or unclear. Non-Performance - The solid evidence supporting the decision is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Critical Thinking – Explanation of Issues Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding. Proficient - Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding. Basic - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding. Below Expectations - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Critical Thinking – Evidence Distinguished - Employs persuasive information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly. Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic. Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. Below Expectations - Displays information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of such information toward
- 9. the analysis of the topic. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand. Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand. Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader. Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. APA Formatting Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page. Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Page Requirement
- 10. Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages. Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Resource Requirement Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Proficient -Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly. Below Expectations - Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Powered by